This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2379* 05 21 07.64 +23 38 19.8 10.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461318.7379,10.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20261005.2379 10.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2379 2461318.7379 11.14 05:17:00.65 +23:55:57.9
180.70664 -8.09318 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 0 1 1 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:00.65 +23:55:57.9: 15.55 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:00.65 +23:55:57.9: 15.67 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.59 +/- 0.20
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2379* 05 17 00.65 +23 55 57.9 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7379,11.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2379 11.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2379 2461318.7379 12.26 05:03:24.05 +26:02:36.9
177.15598 -9.37717 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -0 -0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:24.05 +26:02:36.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:24.05 +26:02:36.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2379* 05 03 24.05 +26 02 36.9 12.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7379,12.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2379 12.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2379* 05 21 07.64 +23 38 19.8 10.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461318.7379,10.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20261005.2379 10.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2379 2461318.7379 12.71 06:00:12.71 +24:54:10.2
185.12637 0.74908 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia -1 0 1 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:00:12.71 +24:54:10.2: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:12.71 +24:54:10.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2379* 06 00 12.71 +24 54 10.2 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7379,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2379 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2379 2461318.7379 13.06 05:14:44.81 +21:52:11.8
182.12717 -9.69238 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -0 -0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:14:44.81 +21:52:11.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:14:44.81 +21:52:11.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2379* 05 14 44.81 +21 52 11.8 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7379,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2379 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2379 2461318.7379 13.14 05:48:11.39 +16:48:04.7
190.71547 -5.75934 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.53 Kalypso 0 -1 1 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:48:11.39 +16:48:04.7: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:48:11.39 +16:48:04.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2379* 05 48 11.39 +16 48 04.7 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7379,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2379 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2379 2461318.7379 13.91 05:01:05.45 +25:07:16.6
177.59218 -10.34530 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia -1 -0 1 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:01:05.45 +25:07:16.6: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:01:05.45 +25:07:16.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2379* 05 01 05.45 +25 07 16.6 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7379,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2379 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2379 2461318.7379 13.62 05:42:44.13 +19:44:41.6
187.51029 -5.35443 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.168 Sibylla 0 -0 0 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:44.13 +19:44:41.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:44.13 +19:44:41.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2379* 05 42 44.13 +19 44 41.6 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7379,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2379 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461318.73831790 05.10.2026 05:43:00.667 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 81 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20432
Objects passed selection criteria: 20375
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17170.8
Average stars matched: 16926.8 (98.579 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 250528 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 00:48:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461318.73831790 05.10.2026 05:43:00.667 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 190
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 173 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 151738
Objects passed selection criteria: 151378
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 123219
Average stars matched: 119414 (96.912 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 591660 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 00:53:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461318.73742604
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Image size: 945.2'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.870 +21:59:53.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.870 +21:59:53.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0030 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 945.0'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:16.090 +21:59:22.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:16.090 +21:59:22.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0167 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:18.870 +21:59:53.10
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:16.090 +21:59:22.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01378 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AFP8SL7VuY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kTJ5NiBaO6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ePlwFWBe9j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.31ha9RVXK4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.AFP8SL7VuY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kTJ5NiBaO6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ePlwFWBe9j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=618, bad_region=0, passed=12456
Got 12456 stars (including 11829 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12456 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4790 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4790 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4726 stars left (next iteration limit 5197)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=9.504 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.113 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.113 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=0.866 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.271 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.271 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=0.421 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.599 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.599 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4726 robust_rms_before=1.658 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.495 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.421 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.703 worst_region_rms_after=0.599 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.673 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.599
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Image size: 945.6'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.982 +21:59:51.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 12456 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky909720.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.658 -> 0.421 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4726 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4499 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4499 pairs (4726 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4499 robust_rms=9.359 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.778 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.778 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4499 robust_rms=0.857 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.257 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.257 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4499 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.593 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.593 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4499 robust_rms_before=0.415 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.415 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.415 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.591 worst_region_rms_after=0.593 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.591 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.593
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.593 vs 0.591 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4499 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4499 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=4499 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.421 n_q1=963 n_q2=1273 n_q3=815 n_q4=1448 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.31ha9RVXK4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=613, bad_region=0, passed=12702
Got 12702 stars (including 12080 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12702 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4794 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4727 stars left (next iteration limit 5200)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=9.737 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.165 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.165 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.793 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.260 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.260 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.595 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.595 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4727 robust_rms_before=1.545 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.495 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.420 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.736 worst_region_rms_after=0.595 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.495 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.595
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:16.191 +21:59:20.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 12702 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky908702.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.545 -> 0.420 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4727 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4495 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4495 pairs (4727 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4495 robust_rms=9.552 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.755 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.755 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4495 robust_rms=0.782 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.194 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.194 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4495 robust_rms=0.416 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.594 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.594 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4495 robust_rms_before=0.415 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.415 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.416 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.594 worst_region_rms_after=0.594 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.594 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.594
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.594 vs 0.594 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=4495 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.437 n_q1=960 n_q2=1282 n_q3=802 n_q4=1451 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.251
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits sigma_overall=0.423 worst_q_ratio=1.212
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.258
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4714 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246_astrometric_residuals.png (4499 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247_astrometric_residuals.png (4495 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:00.65 +23:55:57.9: 15.55 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:24.05 +26:02:36.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:24.05 +26:02:36.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:00.65 +23:55:57.9: 15.67 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.59 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:17:00.65 +23:55:57.9: ref_mag=15.59 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=11.1378 delta=4.46 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30758.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30900.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30717_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 30717_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30758_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 30758_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30886_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 30886_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.38 +20:19:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30900_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 30900_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16428_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 16428_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.43 +19:25:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 14014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:04.05 +20:30:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.17 +17:53:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.49 +17:54:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.99 +20:10:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.47 +20:22:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.43 +23:51:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 20s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:17:00.65 +23:55:57.9
05:03:24.05 +26:02:36.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Image size: 945.6'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.982 +21:59:51.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.982 +21:59:51.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0029 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:16.191 +21:59:20.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:16.191 +21:59:20.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0167 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:18.982 +21:59:51.36
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:16.191 +21:59:20.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01380 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iH4rZQZGxT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q9sEE8TyQG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YIuNVpE9nO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qjLz4vmndk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 180 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.iH4rZQZGxT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.q9sEE8TyQG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4711 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YIuNVpE9nO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=5252, bad_region=41, passed=81716
Got 81716 stars (including 76306 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81716 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013133 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010507 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5186)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=9.827 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.409 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.409 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=0.865 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.217 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.217 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=0.421 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.614 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.614 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4716 robust_rms_before=0.421 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.463 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.421 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.598 worst_region_rms_after=0.614 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.598 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.614
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.598 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.598 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.421 arcsec matched=4716
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.436 n_q1=1014 n_q2=1293 n_q3=878 n_q4=1531 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qjLz4vmndk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=5296, bad_region=44, passed=83214
Got 83214 stars (including 77771 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 83214 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4720 stars left (next iteration limit 5193)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4720 robust_rms=10.086 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.780 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.780 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4720 robust_rms=0.793 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.182 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.182 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4720 robust_rms=0.421 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.593 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.593 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4720 robust_rms_before=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.447 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.421 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.594 worst_region_rms_after=0.593 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.594 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.593
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.594 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.594 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.422 arcsec matched=4720
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=4720 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=1023 n_q2=1284 n_q3=869 n_q4=1544 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-41-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_004354_TTUQ1b1x1_430233_RveMdOtT/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:00:28.06 +20:35:56.1: 14.84 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:15:50.31 +21:02:33.0: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:30.25 +19:22:17.2: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:23:23.06 +18:04:24.6: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:30.25 +19:22:17.2: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:00:28.06 +20:35:56.1: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:15:50.31 +21:02:33.0: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:30.25 +19:22:17.2: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5747 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:23.06 +18:04:24.6: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:50.31 +21:02:33.0: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7933 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:28.06 +20:35:56.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5026 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:23.06 +18:04:24.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1138 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:07.37 +19:56:02.3: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:01:02.13 +25:23:47.3: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:07.37 +19:56:02.3: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:07.37 +19:56:02.3: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0442 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:01:02.13 +25:23:47.3: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:02.13 +25:23:47.3: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7371 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:51:28.63 +18:35:09.8: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:55:31.21 +20:21:41.9: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:19.61 +24:08:26.5: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:12.82 +24:49:47.7: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:05:38.99 +25:57:12.2: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:51:28.63 +18:35:09.8: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:28.63 +18:35:09.8: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8737 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:55:31.21 +20:21:41.9: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:30.55 +19:19:21.9: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:31.21 +20:21:41.9: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7751 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:19.61 +24:08:26.5: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:19.61 +24:08:26.5: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0395 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:12.82 +24:49:47.7: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:12.82 +24:49:47.7: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0287 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:07.95 +21:52:56.1: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:05:38.99 +25:57:12.2: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:30.55 +19:19:21.9: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:38.99 +25:57:12.2: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8006 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:30.55 +19:19:21.9: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6497 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:57.38 +24:41:59.5: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:07.95 +21:52:56.1: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:07.95 +21:52:56.1: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2277 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:57.38 +24:41:59.5: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:57.38 +24:41:59.5: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1390 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:07:58.95 +26:19:50.0: 11.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:01:41.80 +20:49:28.9: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:49.69 +26:44:16.7: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:07:58.95 +26:19:50.0: 11.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.07 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:58.95 +26:19:50.0: ref_mag=11.07 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2573 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:07:15.68 +25:16:12.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:01:41.80 +20:49:28.9: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:49.69 +26:44:16.7: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:41.80 +20:49:28.9: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5018 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:49.69 +26:44:16.7: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2221 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:07:15.68 +25:16:12.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:15.68 +25:16:12.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:00:12.71 +24:54:10.2: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:14:44.81 +21:52:11.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:04:10.83 +25:24:58.0: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:12.71 +24:54:10.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:23.18 +25:24:08.8: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.77 +22:34:32.3: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:04:10.83 +25:24:58.0: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:10.83 +25:24:58.0: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7423 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:48.61 +25:09:12.9: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:14:44.81 +21:52:11.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:23.18 +25:24:08.8: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:23.18 +25:24:08.8: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2281 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.77 +22:34:32.3: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.77 +22:34:32.3: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9381 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:48.61 +25:09:12.9: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:48.61 +25:09:12.9: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3321 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:20.38 +25:08:59.5: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:20.38 +25:08:59.5: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:20.38 +25:08:59.5: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3196 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.63 +25:20:29.9: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.63 +25:20:29.9: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.63 +25:20:29.9: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2681 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:08:49.01 +24:13:14.6: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:08:49.01 +24:13:14.6: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:49.01 +24:13:14.6: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6364 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:56.37 +26:18:57.4: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:56.37 +26:18:57.4: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:56.37 +26:18:57.4: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0599 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:15:00.48 +20:57:18.8: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:46:11.59 +25:41:00.7: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:15:00.48 +20:57:18.8: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:00.48 +20:57:18.8: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5850 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:45.85 +21:33:01.7: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:46:11.59 +25:41:00.7: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:11.59 +25:41:00.7: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4023 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:45.85 +21:33:01.7: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:45.85 +21:33:01.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7159 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:57.36 +25:53:27.0: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:57.36 +25:53:27.0: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:57.36 +25:53:27.0: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5692 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:40.07 +22:58:28.8: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:04.15 +21:09:54.7: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:40.07 +22:58:28.8: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:40.07 +22:58:28.8: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4176 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:04.15 +21:09:54.7: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:04.15 +21:09:54.7: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6075 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:01:05.45 +25:07:16.6: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:48:11.39 +16:48:04.7: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:01:05.45 +25:07:16.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:48:11.39 +16:48:04.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:08:58.37 +24:08:01.3: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:08:58.37 +24:08:01.3: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:58.37 +24:08:01.3: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9815 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:38.03 +22:58:44.9: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:38.03 +22:58:44.9: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:38.03 +22:58:44.9: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6329 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:15.36 +22:18:01.3: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:42.88 +19:58:14.9: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:53:14.29 +16:36:42.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:44.13 +19:44:41.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:15.36 +22:18:01.3: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:42.88 +19:58:14.9: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:15.36 +22:18:01.3: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9270 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:42.88 +19:58:14.9: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8504 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:53:14.29 +16:36:42.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:14.29 +16:36:42.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:44.13 +19:44:41.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:54.54 +21:13:24.7: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:54.54 +21:13:24.7: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:54.54 +21:13:24.7: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3747 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:55:55.97 +22:51:47.7: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:55:55.97 +22:51:47.7: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:55.97 +22:51:47.7: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8431 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191394.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191400.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191979.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191986.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192384.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 23s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190567_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190567_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190568_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190568_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:09.91 +24:04:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:36.89 +19:59:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190592_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190592_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:30.94 +18:09:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190605_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190605_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:56.46 +23:05:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190615_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190615_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190617_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190617_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:37.29 +19:47:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.59 +21:59:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:54.33 +18:25:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190623_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190623_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.77 +25:17:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190625_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190625_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:56.19 +22:13:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190632_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190632_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190633_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190633_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.93 +23:00:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190636_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190636_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190638_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190638_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190639_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190639_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190640_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190640_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.14 +18:20:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190641_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190641_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:29.68 +16:41:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190697_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 190697_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190727_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190727_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190768_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190768_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190874_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190874_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:24.00 +26:02:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190920_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190920_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.12 +22:38:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190962_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190962_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190994_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190994_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.83 +25:55:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191000_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191000_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.69 +22:27:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191058_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191058_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.73 +23:02:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191067_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191067_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.98 +26:25:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.73 +19:34:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191182_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191182_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:20.98 +23:48:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191240_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191240_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.21 +18:59:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191274_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191274_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.43 +18:33:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191283_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191283_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.94 +20:10:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191322_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191322_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.14 +23:12:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191341_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191341_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.76 +22:40:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191357_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191357_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:40.42 +20:26:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.63 +20:02:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191382_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191382_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.26 +22:45:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.93 +18:33:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191394_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 191394_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191396_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191396_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.78 +22:03:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191400_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 191400_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191412_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191412_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191414_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191414_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191419_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191419_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:02.48 +18:29:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191434_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191434_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191441_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191441_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:21.40 +26:25:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191449_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191449_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191455_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191455_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.83 +18:25:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191467_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191467_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.22 +20:53:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191498_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191498_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191506_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191506_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.24 +25:47:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191514_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191514_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.71 +19:32:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191529_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191529_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.46 +24:25:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191555_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191555_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:36.20 +18:33:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191577_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191577_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.60 +21:46:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.28 +18:40:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191594_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191617_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191617_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:58.31 +23:15:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191620_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:56.44 +26:13:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191626_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191626_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191643_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191643_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:44.09 +26:10:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191665_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191665_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.96 +17:11:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191677_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191677_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.65 +20:05:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191681_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191681_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:52.66 +24:33:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191683_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191683_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191697_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191697_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:02.17 +25:15:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191703_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191703_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.25 +23:07:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191709_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191709_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.00 +24:24:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191721_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191721_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.30 +24:57:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191775_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191775_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.63 +25:22:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191802_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191802_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.78 +23:11:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191805_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191805_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.32 +20:56:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191821_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191821_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:15.66 +18:46:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191829_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191829_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:47.53 +26:44:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191852_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191852_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.12 +21:59:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191864_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191864_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191870_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191870_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191872_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191872_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.42 +24:22:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191878_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191878_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.81 +24:21:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191882_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191882_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:01.57 +23:19:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191885_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191885_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:06.40 +24:25:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191888_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191888_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191904_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191904_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:51.13 +20:15:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191916_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191916_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.42 +20:09:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191921_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191921_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:58.83 +25:07:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191939_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191939_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.17 +18:44:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191941_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191941_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:43.29 +26:18:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191950_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191950_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191967_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191967_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.71 +17:59:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.48 +20:26:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191973_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191973_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191974_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191974_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:20.96 +24:22:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191975_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191975_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.55 +21:47:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191976_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191976_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:51.84 +23:51:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191977_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191977_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:46.63 +22:45:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191979_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 191979_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191986_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 191986_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191988_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191988_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:07.05 +24:22:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191998_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191998_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:08.26 +22:06:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192012_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192012_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:51.88 +20:00:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192027_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192027_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.58 +22:39:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192032_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192032_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:01.47 +21:49:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192050_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192050_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:56.35 +18:54:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192053_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192053_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192055_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192055_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.16 +25:18:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192088_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192088_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:39.82 +25:01:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192089_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192089_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:37.14 +24:06:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192103_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192103_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:39.39 +21:57:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192121_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192121_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:21.86 +17:17:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192140_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192140_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192142_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192142_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:57.02 +19:31:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192144_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192144_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.58 +21:24:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192166_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192166_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:43.12 +24:06:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192212_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192212_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:33.72 +21:19:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192221_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192221_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:56.37 +22:27:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192234_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192234_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192320_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192320_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192350_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 192350_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192384_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 192384_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57016_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 57016_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:58.87 +23:30:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.48 +20:22:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 33497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:08.11 +24:51:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.49 +17:54:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 32970_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.53 +25:01:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.14 +25:59:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:56.52 +21:25:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.36 +25:40:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 68483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:59.79 +22:30:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:01.44 +20:16:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:12.54 +19:30:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 56378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:34.79 +23:22:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:50.57 +21:45:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98078_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 98078_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:16.10 +20:53:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.06 +24:59:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 76761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:57.87 +22:13:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.40 +26:13:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.86 +23:10:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.99 +24:53:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50010_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 50010_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38929_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 38929_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:42.98 +24:38:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 63572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.07 +22:46:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.19 +24:09:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.38 +20:19:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 37049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:50.45 +24:45:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 80011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:23.40 +21:44:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.77 +19:21:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:20.19 +17:59:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.73 +22:47:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 166618_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:25.34 +17:43:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 138780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:10.63 +19:08:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.19 +20:22:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.11 +17:45:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.45 +19:25:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:25.76 +22:48:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.16 +17:53:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.78 +16:57:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.15 +21:51:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113322_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 113322_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:33.07 +20:06:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.43 +23:51:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66907_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 66907_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:18.33 +22:39:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:48.57 +19:44:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.92 +21:13:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:15.53 +20:28:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18807_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 18807_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.62 +25:49:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:49.00 +20:10:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-43-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
