NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-05-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    11.53    23:44:15.10 -08:31:04.6   2420 3954   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    11.50    23:44:15.07 -08:31:04.6   2417 3960   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 05.2274  2461318.7274  11.52  23:44:15.09 -08:31:04.6
 79.31132 -65.52746 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
106 Dione                   -0      0       1  11.7     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:15.09 -08:31:04.6:  15.29 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:15.09 -08:31:04.6:  15.30 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    12.52    23:58:40.58 -07:48:59.2   4543 4512   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    12.53    23:58:40.52 -07:48:59.4   4540 4519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 05.2274  2461318.7274  12.53  23:58:40.55 -07:48:59.3
 87.58957 -66.99493 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
217 Eudora                  -0      0       0  12.4     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:58:40.55 -07:48:59.3:  15.54 +/- 0.36  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:58:40.55 -07:48:59.3:  15.58 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.54 +/- 0.36
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    13.11    00:21:30.64 -09:25:39.6   7998 3717   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    13.11    00:21:30.64 -09:25:39.9   7995 3724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 05.2274  2461318.7274  13.11  00:21:30.64 -09:25:39.8
 99.76713 -70.94118 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
906 Repsolda                -0     -0       0  13.2     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:21:30.64 -09:25:39.8:  15.47 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:21:30.64 -09:25:39.8:  15.48 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    13.75    23:52:21.39 -11:25:02.1   3739 2290   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    13.68    23:52:21.43 -11:25:01.6   3737 2297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 05.2274  2461318.7274  13.71  23:52:21.41 -11:25:01.9
 78.62471 -69.03714 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1133 Lugduna                 -1     -0       1  13.7    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:21.41 -11:25:01.9:  15.45 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:21.41 -11:25:01.9:  15.48 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 4

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 332289 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 332295 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits

renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1327.2755 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 556.2899 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1326.2927 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 557.5103 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.73406 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-05T00:26:46.8755068' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-05T05:26:46.8755068' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61318.2269314234 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-05T05:26:56.7762162' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61318.2270460185 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.99944396222 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.9996699231508 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.9522222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 170.598611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.38999922861989 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29500 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29500 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 89.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 909.99 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 225.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.900232 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits :) Spent 0.895042 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-05T00:27:46.8017738' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-05T05:27:46.8017738' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61318.2276250115 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-05T05:27:56.7023320' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61318.2277396065 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999443944323 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99966991894811 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.9852777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 170.947777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.38922688497139 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29500 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29500 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 89.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 909.99 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 225.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.900232 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits :) Spent 0.814096 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461318.72704716 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:48.690 -10:01:26.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 23:59:48.690 -10:01:26.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0531 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:49.539 -10:02:06.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 23:59:49.539 -10:02:06.79 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0558 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:59:48.690 -10:01:26.61 Second-epoch second image center 23:59:49.539 -10:02:06.79 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01169 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fJzblJUtw2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6NU8XUetjZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dAKI6OJEXe Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qri37fghm6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.95 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.95
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.1) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.6 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.3 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 3.1 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits 3.1 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 15.0 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.fJzblJUtw2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=0, passed=4374 Got 4374 stars (including 4092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3991 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0777, gap 8.0777 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 3991 stars left (next iteration limit 4390) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3991 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1080 n_q2=969 n_q3=999 n_q4=943 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.6NU8XUetjZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=0, passed=4358 Got 4358 stars (including 4088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3988 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0776, gap 8.0776 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 3988 stars left (next iteration limit 4386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3988 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1022 n_q2=971 n_q3=1079 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.dAKI6OJEXe (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=322, bad_region=0, passed=6088 Got 6088 stars (including 5762 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6088 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6382 through 0 to 8.0950, gap 8.0950 to 351.6382 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6088 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6375 through 0 to 8.0954, gap 8.0954 to 351.6375 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6088 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6088 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=13.447 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.354 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.354 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.407 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.656 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.656 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.288 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.369 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.369 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=1.012 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.273 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.288 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.372 worst_region_rms_after=0.369 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.014 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.369 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.372 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.372 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.273 arcsec matched=4871 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.241 n_q1=1258 n_q2=1126 n_q3=1366 n_q4=1121 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.qri37fghm6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=338, bad_region=0, passed=6072 Got 6072 stars (including 5729 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6072 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6383 through 0 to 8.0950, gap 8.0950 to 351.6383 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6072 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6376 through 0 to 8.0954, gap 8.0954 to 351.6376 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6072 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6072 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=13.389 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.372 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.372 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.627 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.627 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.291 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.377 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.377 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=1.004 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.277 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.291 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.384 worst_region_rms_after=0.377 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.040 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.377 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.384 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.384 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.277 arcsec matched=4874 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1253 n_q2=1123 n_q3=1368 n_q4=1130 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.109 ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.078 new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.164 new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits sigma_overall=0.279 worst_q_ratio=1.161 reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.0935 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3991 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3988 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232_astrometric_residuals.png (4871 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:15.09 -08:31:04.6: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:49.49 -08:01:55.9: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:49.49 -08:01:55.9: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:49.49 -08:01:55.9: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8548 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:15.09 -08:31:04.6: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20309.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20258_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 20258_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    10.28    00:19:24.42 -08:51:12.1   7665 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits **** FOUND 00:19:24.42 -08:51:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20309_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 Preparing report for the candidate 20309_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20340_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 20340_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    11.86    23:32:49.49 -08:01:55.8   0678 4126   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    11.85    23:32:49.50 -08:01:55.9   0676 4132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    9.15    00:02:07.32 -14:40:31.0   5287 0418   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits **** FOUND 00:02:07.33 -14:40:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 23:44:15.09 -08:31:04.6 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:48.690 -10:01:26.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 23:59:48.690 -10:01:26.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0531 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:49.539 -10:02:06.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 23:59:49.539 -10:02:06.79 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0558 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:59:48.690 -10:01:26.61 Second-epoch second image center 23:59:49.539 -10:02:06.79 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01169 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IepFLk3WwK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MJMXLPjBY3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ONVQycxmdF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4jQc5koHvR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.388800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.388800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.3) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 42 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.2 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 15.1 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.IepFLk3WwK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=913, bad_region=0, passed=22729 Got 22729 stars (including 21779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22729 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0982, gap 8.0982 to 351.9463 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.MJMXLPjBY3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=0, passed=23408 Got 23408 stars (including 22542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0899, gap 8.0899 to 351.9465 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.ONVQycxmdF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=946, bad_region=46, passed=26110 Got 26110 stars (including 25090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26110 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5843 through 0 to 8.0949, gap 8.0949 to 351.5843 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26110 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5836 through 0 to 8.0954, gap 8.0954 to 351.5836 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26110 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26110 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5335) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=13.566 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.299 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.299 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.653 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.653 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.366 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.366 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4850 robust_rms_before=1.014 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.360 worst_region_rms_after=0.366 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.011 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.366 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.360 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.360 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.270 arcsec matched=4850 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.239 n_q1=1211 n_q2=1117 n_q3=1370 n_q4=1152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.4jQc5koHvR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=939, bad_region=47, passed=26129 Got 26129 stars (including 25114 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26129 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5878 through 0 to 8.1153, gap 8.1153 to 351.5878 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26129 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5871 through 0 to 8.1158, gap 8.1158 to 351.5871 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26129 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26129 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5335) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=13.531 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.453 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.453 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.626 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.626 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.370 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.370 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4850 robust_rms_before=1.004 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.272 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.377 worst_region_rms_after=0.370 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.036 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.370 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.377 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.377 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.272 arcsec matched=4850 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=1218 n_q2=1104 n_q3=1371 n_q4=1157 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:58:40.55 -07:48:59.3: 15.54 +/- 0.36 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:34.53 -05:21:35.7: 13.70 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:03.73 -08:49:41.7: 14.15 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.64 -05:59:50.4: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:30.34 -10:15:40.7: 14.01 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:36:52.53 -06:16:24.9: 14.03 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:27:54.39 -14:23:21.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:27.22 -13:24:58.7: 13.83 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:58:40.55 -07:48:59.3: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.64 -05:59:50.4: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.36 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:58:40.55 -07:48:59.3: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.36 new_mean_mag=12.5217 delta=3.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.64 -05:59:50.4: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0830 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:30.34 -10:15:40.7: 14.16 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:03.73 -08:49:41.7: 14.12 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:30.34 -10:15:40.7: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2979 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:34.53 -05:21:35.7: 13.59 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:03.73 -08:49:41.7: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1598 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:27.22 -13:24:58.7: 14.23 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:36:52.53 -06:16:24.9: 13.94 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:27:54.39 -14:23:21.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:54.39 -14:23:21.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:27.22 -13:24:58.7: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0206 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:34.53 -05:21:35.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8171 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:52.53 -06:16:24.9: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0072 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.68 -07:36:48.1: 12.85 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.68 -07:36:48.1: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.68 -07:36:48.1: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2250 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:51:01.65 -05:38:19.6: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:41:57.22 -07:37:14.0: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:21:30.64 -09:25:39.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:39:31.72 -05:40:45.0: 14.57 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:21.41 -11:25:01.9: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.91 -06:31:08.0: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:36.11 -10:20:04.2: 13.93 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:10.29 -12:23:27.0: 13.80 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:51:01.65 -05:38:19.6: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:01.65 -05:38:19.6: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2956 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:41:57.22 -07:37:14.0: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:21:30.64 -09:25:39.8: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:39:31.72 -05:40:45.0: 14.34 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:21.41 -11:25:01.9: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:57.22 -07:37:14.0: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3808 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:36.11 -10:20:04.2: 13.96 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:31.72 -05:40:45.0: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2604 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:36.11 -10:20:04.2: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9755 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:10.29 -12:23:27.0: 14.02 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:10.29 -12:23:27.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7954 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:39:20.58 -05:47:43.1: 14.44 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.91 -06:31:08.0: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.91 -06:31:08.0: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4399 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:39:20.58 -05:47:43.1: 14.36 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:20.58 -05:47:43.1: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3173 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:41:53.92 -05:33:12.3: 14.38 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:11.71 -05:10:51.3: 14.44 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:46.72 -05:35:49.1: 14.74 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:59.36 -08:18:32.2: 14.48 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:25.46 -09:29:10.6: 14.33 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:29:09.80 -09:15:46.1: 13.99 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:41:53.92 -05:33:12.3: 14.33 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:11.71 -05:10:51.3: 14.59 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:53.92 -05:33:12.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3167 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:11.71 -05:10:51.3: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2833 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:25.46 -09:29:10.6: 14.39 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:25.46 -09:29:10.6: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2838 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:59.36 -08:18:32.2: 14.41 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:59.36 -08:18:32.2: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1587 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:46.72 -05:35:49.1: 14.38 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:46.72 -05:35:49.1: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3131 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:34:40.96 -06:21:06.5: 14.46 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:29:09.80 -09:15:46.1: 14.14 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:09.80 -09:15:46.1: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2768 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:34:40.96 -06:21:06.5: 14.36 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:40.96 -06:21:06.5: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4693 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.30 -09:01:10.6: 13.69 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:02.86 -08:23:47.9: 14.29 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:22.58 -08:30:08.2: 14.37 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:08.58 -07:39:58.7: 14.43 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:43.34 -06:40:27.8: 14.37 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:55:36.44 -05:54:18.0: 14.38 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:22.58 -08:30:08.2: 14.35 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:02.86 -08:23:47.9: 14.39 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:22.58 -08:30:08.2: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2263 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:36:11.90 -07:52:04.3: 14.76 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.30 -09:01:10.6: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:02.86 -08:23:47.9: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3665 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.30 -09:01:10.6: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0301 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:08.58 -07:39:58.7: 14.30 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:08.58 -07:39:58.7: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3337 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:55:36.44 -05:54:18.0: 14.51 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:36.44 -05:54:18.0: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3509 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:43.34 -06:40:27.8: 14.22 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:43.34 -06:40:27.8: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2253 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:36:11.90 -07:52:04.3: 14.77 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:11.90 -07:52:04.3: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3258 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:28:52.06 -09:08:39.6: 14.38 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:50:31.82 -10:55:34.0: 14.93 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:19:57.96 -11:38:24.8: 14.23 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:25:23.31 -10:05:47.5: 14.55 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:50:31.82 -10:55:34.0: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:28:52.06 -09:08:39.6: 14.26 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:19:57.96 -11:38:24.8: 14.46 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:50:31.82 -10:55:34.0: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3823 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:52.06 -09:08:39.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3034 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:57.96 -11:38:24.8: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1263 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:25:23.31 -10:05:47.5: 14.56 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:23.31 -10:05:47.5: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3428 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32578.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32767.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32986.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32378_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32378_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.28    00:13:30.37 -10:15:40.6   6825 3160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.32    00:13:30.31 -10:15:40.9   6822 3167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32385_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32385_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.04    00:06:27.24 -13:24:58.7   5881 1207   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.00    00:06:27.20 -13:24:58.7   5879 1214   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32389_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32389_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.24    23:37:03.71 -08:49:41.6   1356 3691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.10    23:37:03.75 -08:49:41.8   1353 3697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32393_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32393_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.08    00:13:02.63 -05:59:51.5   6634 5730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.09    00:13:02.64 -05:59:49.2   6631 5737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32397_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32397_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    13.84    00:29:34.55 -05:21:35.8   9132 6248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    13.80    00:29:34.51 -05:21:35.5   9129 6254   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32398_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32398_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.03    23:36:52.56 -06:16:25.0   1208 5236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    13.98    23:36:52.49 -06:16:24.9   1206 5242   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32427_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32427_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    10.28    00:19:24.43 -08:51:12.2   7665 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits **** FOUND 00:19:24.43 -08:51:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32480_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32480_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    11.61    23:44:15.08 -08:31:04.7   2417 3960   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits **** FOUND 23:44:15.09 -08:31:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32537_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32537_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    12.08    23:27:54.41 -14:23:22.1   0247 0202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    12.07    23:27:54.36 -14:23:21.7   0244 0209   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32578_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 Preparing report for the candidate 32578_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32585_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32585_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    12.58    00:05:10.85 -05:41:48.7   5440 5854   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits **** FOUND 00:05:10.84 -05:41:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32709_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32709_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    13.19    23:48:06.71 -07:36:48.0   2959 4537   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    13.26    23:48:06.66 -07:36:48.2   2956 4544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32718_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32718_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    13.30    23:51:01.66 -05:38:19.5   3316 5758   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    13.29    23:51:01.64 -05:38:19.7   3314 5764   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32747_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32747_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    13.34    23:41:57.22 -07:37:13.5   2036 4472   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    13.43    23:41:57.22 -07:37:14.5   2034 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32767_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 Preparing report for the candidate 32767_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32768_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32768_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    13.42    23:52:48.93 -06:31:07.9   3619 5242   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    13.46    23:52:48.88 -06:31:08.1   3617 5248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32941_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32941_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    13.71    23:33:10.31 -12:23:29.0   0938 1490   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    13.94    23:33:10.26 -12:23:25.1   0936 1497   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32982_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 32982_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    13.96    23:31:36.11 -10:20:02.9   0605 2717   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.00    23:31:36.11 -10:20:05.4   0602 2723   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32986_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 Preparing report for the candidate 32986_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33063_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33063_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.26    23:39:31.74 -05:40:45.3   1583 5624   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.26    23:39:31.71 -05:40:44.6   1580 5631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33072_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33072_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.32    23:39:20.62 -05:47:43.3   1560 5551   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.32    23:39:20.54 -05:47:43.0   1558 5558   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33076_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33076_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.31    23:41:53.97 -05:33:12.8   1937 5723   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.33    23:41:53.86 -05:33:11.8   1934 5730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33077_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33077_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.32    23:31:11.72 -05:10:50.8   0288 5844   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.26    23:31:11.70 -05:10:51.7   0285 5850   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33100_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33100_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.16    23:43:59.37 -08:18:32.2   2372 4077   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.15    23:43:59.34 -08:18:32.2   2369 4084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33106_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33106_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.32    23:32:46.78 -05:35:48.3   0552 5606   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.31    23:32:46.67 -05:35:49.9   0549 5612   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33126_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33126_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.22    23:33:25.39 -09:29:10.4   0839 3252   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.42    23:33:25.54 -09:29:10.7   0836 3259   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33135_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33135_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.23    23:29:09.84 -09:15:46.8   0183 3337   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.35    23:29:09.76 -09:15:45.3   0181 3344   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33138_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33138_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.48    23:34:40.93 -06:21:07.6   0879 5166   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.44    23:34:40.98 -06:21:05.3   0876 5173   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33145_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33145_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.07    00:00:47.28 -09:01:10.8   4899 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    13.99    00:00:47.33 -09:01:10.4   4896 3814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33146_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33146_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.28    23:32:02.85 -08:23:47.8   0578 3896   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.54    23:32:02.87 -08:23:48.1   0576 3902   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33164_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33164_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.31    23:33:08.58 -07:39:58.5   0709 4351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.36    23:33:08.59 -07:39:59.0   0706 4358   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33179_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33179_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.23    23:48:22.57 -08:30:07.7   3035 4004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.23    23:48:22.59 -08:30:08.7   3032 4011   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33189_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33189_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.31    23:55:36.47 -05:54:18.7   4014 5638   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.40    23:55:36.41 -05:54:17.4   4012 5645   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33194_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33194_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.28    23:52:43.32 -06:40:27.8   3611 5147   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.18    23:52:43.37 -06:40:27.8   3609 5154   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33195_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33195_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.33    23:36:11.82 -07:52:04.1   1181 4262   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.33    23:36:11.98 -07:52:04.5   1179 4269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33212_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33212_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.31    23:28:52.10 -09:08:41.2   0133 3405   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.29    23:28:52.02 -09:08:38.0   0130 3412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33243_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33243_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    13.87    23:50:11.35 -13:49:46.7   3512 0821   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits **** FOUND 23:50:11.28 -13:49:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33278_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33278_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.19    00:18:36.72 -08:02:59.5   7525 4537   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits **** FOUND 00:18:36.69 -08:02:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33419_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33419_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.31    23:50:31.89 -10:55:34.1   3451 2568   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.50    23:50:31.75 -10:55:34.0   3448 2575   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33478_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33478_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.13    00:19:57.97 -11:38:24.4   7824 2370   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.13    00:19:57.94 -11:38:25.2   7821 2377   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33644_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 33644_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 05.22705    2461318.72705    14.29    00:25:23.25 -10:05:46.5   8597 3336   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-26-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    14.43    00:25:23.38 -10:05:48.6   8595 3343   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 The candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 05.22774    2461318.72774    9.02    00:02:07.31 -14:40:31.0   5287 0418   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_002838_TTUQ1b1x1_474871_LK5km36Y/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-05_00-27-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits **** FOUND 00:02:07.33 -14:40:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 23:44:15.09 -08:31:04.6 23:58:40.55 -07:48:59.3 00:21:30.64 -09:25:39.8 23:52:21.41 -11:25:01.9 ########### Completed Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 23:44:15.09 -08:31:04.6 23:58:40.55 -07:48:59.3 00:21:30.64 -09:25:39.8 23:52:21.41 -11:25:01.9 ################################################################################### 23:44:15.09 -08:31:04.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:58:40.55 -07:48:59.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:21:30.64 -09:25:39.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:52:21.41 -11:25:01.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461318.72704716 -observatory V36 14:10:31.34 -15:31:29.6 Mercury (-0.0mag) 14:12:29.16 -21:09:24.3 Venus (-4.7mag) 08:25:22.83 +20:21:59.0 Mars (1.1mag) 09:30:16.11 +15:24:07.8 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:44:13.40 +01:48:12.3 Saturn (0.3mag) 04:12:39.55 +20:59:25.5 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:57.38 -00:21:40.5 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:16.94 -23:43:24.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 08:27:39.04 +20:49:56.5 Moon (-9.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 5 00:38 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461318.72704716: 09:30:23.22 +15:23:30.2 Io (9.6mag) 09:30:20.59 +15:23:45.5 Europa (6.2mag) 09:30:32.37 +15:22:39.9 Ganymede (8.1mag) 09:30:23.13 +15:23:31.4 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:29:33.76 +15:45:48.4 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:30:14.24 +15:24:17.8 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:28:34.74 +15:44:13.6 Elara (17.5mag) 09:33:04.07 +14:46:52.4 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:29:18.96 +15:49:36.7 Carme (18.9mag) 00:44:24.90 +01:48:04.0 Titan (8.2mag) 00:44:11.78 +01:47:53.7 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:43:34.77 +01:45:48.2 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:44:15.47 +01:48:30.0 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:42:36.35 +01:36:04.1 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 5 00:38 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461318.72704716: 02:06:07.06 +20:51:56.7 JWST 14:02:45.35 +53:54:59.1 Chandra 10:51:08.50 -58:45:27.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 5 00:38 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461318.72704716 -observatory V36 03:47:23.62 +20:09:11.1 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:19:28.57 -33:38:24.3 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:37:04.63 -71:59:56.7 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:25.05 +34:28:18.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:03:36.99 +48:14:45.9 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:27:32.50 +25:31:39.0 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:39.92 -18:04:07.1 15.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:58:44.77 +35:02:54.4 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:25:54.07 +41:48:55.0 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:45:32.37 -13:30:05.1 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:15:37.12 +12:30:41.9 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 12:05:45.13 +16:30:12.1 16.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:44:51.68 -02:12:13.3 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:17:30.08 +67:28:25.4 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:42:55.46 +44:06:05.0 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:39:44.02 +13:39:48.9 17.7mag A/2026 E1 00:41:33.27 +19:44:39.9 17.8mag 2P/Encke 22:51:40.47 -32:57:11.1 14.3mag 10P/Tempel 02:02:04.37 +39:27:45.3 16.9mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:07:05.10 -07:39:42.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:26:29.10 -08:39:05.8 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 07:27:10.71 +16:39:49.2 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 03:05:46.26 +14:36:36.3 17.5mag 88P/Howell 07:16:25.90 +38:25:03.0 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:47:51.65 +16:18:41.5 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:28:15.23 +14:40:12.7 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:51:24.83 -30:25:13.8 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:46:08.50 +19:34:31.2 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 23:36:28.61 +00:32:26.7 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 22:39:26.10 -02:15:33.7 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:05:28.61 +35:47:45.9 16.8mag 162P/Siding Spring 10:03:20.79 +03:10:20.2 13.7mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:57.13 +05:23:06.3 14.7mag 220P/McNaught 05:53:08.33 +43:49:46.2 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:17:42.68 +25:47:36.8 18.0mag 266P/Christensen 15:46:32.11 -03:15:46.2 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski 09:49:51.48 +32:01:12.2 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 5 00:38 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 5 00:38 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 5 00:38 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 02:30:40.630 +02:46:53.02 AT 2026acdo 2026-09-15.85 21.95 02:09:16.870 +01:28:36.92 AT 2026acdn 2026-09-15.84 22.4 01:52:25.390 -01:02:18.80 AT 2026acdm 2026-09-15.84 21.59 01:26:00.430 +05:11:07.70 AT 2026acdl 2026-09-13.85 22.3 00:59:21.730 +05:19:21.52 AT 2026acdk 2026-09-12.90 22.44 01:52:37.109 +00:19:05.30 AT 2026acdj 2026-09-12.77 22.53 01:45:08.290 +04:57:01.83 AT 2026acdi 2026-09-12.77 22.56 23:52:08.000 +02:30:09.80 AT 2026acdh 2026-09-12.74 22.38 23:00:43.000 +00:08:30.74 AT 2026acdg 2026-09-12.73 22.19 23:43:16.060 +01:40:02.02 AT 2026acdf 2026-09-10.84 22.6 01:56:12.660 +01:50:37.08 AT 2026acde 2026-09-10.77 22.48 01:20:44.400 +06:02:00.40 AT 2026acdd 2026-09-10.77 21.86 01:13:31.990 +04:24:23.63 AT 2026acdc 2026-09-10.76 22.79 01:15:03.600 +05:10:37.90 AT 2026acdb 2026-09-08.89 22.67 01:07:11.080 +05:05:45.33 AT 2026acda 2026-09-08.89 22.57 02:31:08.610 -00:16:42.93 AT 2026accz 2026-09-08.85 22.57 02:03:05.540 +01:55:47.58 AT 2026accy 2026-09-08.84 22.4 01:59:22.490 +00:05:02.08 AT 2026accx 2026-09-08.84 22.22 01:21:28.510 +02:30:23.28 AT 2026accw 2026-09-08.83 22.18 01:06:56.650 +00:08:23.74 AT 2026accv 2026-09-08.82 22.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 5 00:38 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 88 C