This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2247 2461318.7247 10.49 20:12:20.16 -19:01:03.8
23.90198 -26.06960 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 1 1 1 10.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:12:20.16 -19:01:03.8: 13.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:12:20.16 -19:01:03.8: 13.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2247* 20 12 20.16 -19 01 03.8 10.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7247,10.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2247 10.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2247 2461318.7247 10.13 20:11:18.49 -14:16:05.0
28.63535 -24.01191 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" R Cap
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.900 V 14.900 V 2454200.00000 343.000000000000 C0e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:11:18.49 -14:16:05.0: 11.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:11:18.49 -14:16:05.0: 11.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.04 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2247* 20 11 18.49 -14 16 05.0 10.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
R Cap,2461318.7247,10.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
R Cap 20261005.2247 10.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2247 2461318.7247 12.27 20:22:40.79 -20:28:32.0
23.35410 -28.86465 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.287 Nephthys -0 0 0 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:22:40.79 -20:28:32.0: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:22:40.79 -20:28:32.0: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2247* 20 22 40.79 -20 28 32.0 12.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7247,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2247 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2247 2461318.7247 13.87 20:32:34.36 -21:31:28.2
23.12692 -31.39300 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.462 Eriphyla -1 0 1 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:32:34.36 -21:31:28.2: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:32:34.36 -21:31:28.2: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2247* 20 32 34.36 -21 31 28.2 13.9 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7247,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2247 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87051049 22.06.2026 08:53:22.106 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
First image: 2461213.87051049 22.06.2026 08:53:22.106 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Last image: 2461318.72499192 05.10.2026 05:23:49.302 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10016
Objects passed selection criteria: 10005
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7956.5
Average stars matched: 7126.25 (89.5651 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235052 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 03:15:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87051049 22.06.2026 08:53:22.106 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
First image: 2461213.87051049 22.06.2026 08:53:22.106 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Last image: 2461318.72499192 05.10.2026 05:23:49.302 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 146
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 63 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 72401
Objects passed selection criteria: 72212
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 58192.2
Average stars matched: 52748.5 (90.6452 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 283220 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 03:17:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461318.72447569
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:38.526 -17:59:34.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 20:26:38.526 -17:59:34.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0098 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:39.515 -17:59:00.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 20:26:39.515 -17:59:00.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0158 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:38.526 -17:59:34.05
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:39.515 -17:59:00.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01014 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HbVy7Rzt2h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DoOYYcKppg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gPJEHS5wlZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3JiDwrUcrs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10015 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2232 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2232 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Loaded 8358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6411 out of 6630 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6630 out of 10015 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.615000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.615000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.98
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.98
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10015 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2232 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2232 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Loaded 8358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6411 out of 6630 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6630 out of 10015 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 9886 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2069 to 315.1115 deg, Dec -23.2589 to -12.6185 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2069 to 315.1115 deg, Dec -23.2589 to -12.6185 deg
Loaded 8355 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6384 out of 6585 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6585 out of 9886 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 14 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
2.2 pix Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
15.0 mag. Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.HbVy7Rzt2h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=610, bad_region=2162, passed=10015
Got 10015 stars (including 7361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10015 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=1460 n_q2=951 n_q3=1561 n_q4=940 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DoOYYcKppg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=578, bad_region=1964, passed=9886
Got 9886 stars (including 7437 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9886 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=1493 n_q2=875 n_q3=1618 n_q4=920 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gPJEHS5wlZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=565, bad_region=1744, passed=9875
Got 9875 stars (including 7710 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9875 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=6.861 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.233 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.233 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.452 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.663 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.663 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.413 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.599 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.599 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=0.822 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.393 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.413 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.626 worst_region_rms_after=0.599 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.058 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.599
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.626 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.626 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.393 arcsec matched=4905
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.429 n_q1=1627 n_q2=946 n_q3=1543 n_q4=789 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.209
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3JiDwrUcrs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=576, bad_region=1742, passed=9867
Got 9867 stars (including 7699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9867 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=6.932 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.232 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.232 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.449 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.672 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.672 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.407 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.580 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.580 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4908 robust_rms_before=0.834 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.394 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.407 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.631 worst_region_rms_after=0.580 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.052 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.580
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.631 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.631 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.394 arcsec matched=4908
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=1615 n_q2=951 n_q3=1548 n_q4=794 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.175
ref2=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.113
new1=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.209
new2=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.200
reference average sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.144
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (4905 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:27:11.89 -16:31:50.7: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:12:20.16 -19:01:03.8: 13.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:35:46.95 -17:32:07.1: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:23:31.40 -20:58:47.0: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:37:14.70 -21:29:13.2: 11.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:41:00.08 -16:24:25.4: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:28:15.62 -13:47:58.1: 10.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:23:55.74 -14:49:23.7: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:34:39.69 -15:57:30.7: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:27:24.61 -17:24:57.7: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:41:00.08 -16:24:25.4: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:23:55.74 -14:49:23.7: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:00.08 -16:24:25.4: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6495 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:55.74 -14:49:23.7: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8880 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:34:39.69 -15:57:30.7: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:35:46.95 -17:32:07.1: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:12:20.16 -19:01:03.8: 13.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:28:15.62 -13:47:58.1: 11.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:37:14.70 -21:29:13.2: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:23:31.40 -20:58:47.0: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:27:11.89 -16:31:50.7: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:12:20.16 -19:01:03.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.4873 delta=2.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:27:24.61 -17:24:57.7: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:39.69 -15:57:30.7: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9267 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.97 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:46.95 -17:32:07.1: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8532 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:14.70 -21:29:13.2: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8548 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:15.62 -13:47:58.1: ref_mag=10.97 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2945 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:31.40 -20:58:47.0: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8471 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:24.61 -17:24:57.7: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9249 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:11.89 -16:31:50.7: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8792 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:34:38.47 -17:40:29.1: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:11:18.49 -14:16:05.0: 11.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:34:38.47 -17:40:29.1: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:38.47 -17:40:29.1: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8960 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:11:18.49 -14:16:05.0: 11.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.04 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:11:18.49 -14:16:05.0: ref_mag=11.04 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1272 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09228.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20990.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20837_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 20837_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:32.06 -17:03:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20990_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
Preparing report for the candidate 20990_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21540_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 21540_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21861_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 21861_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:29.13 -21:58:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21910_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 21910_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22136_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 22136_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22154_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 22154_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22182_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 22182_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22185_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 22185_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22201_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 22201_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22220_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 22220_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22232_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 22232_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22242_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 22242_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09228_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
Preparing report for the candidate 09228_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:11:18.49 -14:16:05.0
20:12:20.16 -19:01:03.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:38.526 -17:59:34.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 20:26:38.526 -17:59:34.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0098 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:26:39.515 -17:59:00.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:26:40.503 -17:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 20:26:39.515 -17:59:00.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0158 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:26:38.526 -17:59:34.05
Second-epoch second image center 20:26:39.515 -17:59:00.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01014 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qnwFkcexhX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oRPL835utX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jfVipfL5C2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zqDj3TWsia
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76028 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2134 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2134 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Loaded 8365 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6515 out of 7320 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7320 out of 76028 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.453300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.453300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76028 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2134 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2134 to 315.1326 deg, Dec -23.2656 to -12.6179 deg
Loaded 8365 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6515 out of 7320 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7320 out of 76028 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 74062 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 298.2069 to 315.1336 deg, Dec -23.2623 to -12.6186 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 298.2069 to 315.1336 deg, Dec -23.2623 to -12.6186 deg
Loaded 8367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6550 out of 7273 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7273 out of 74062 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 81 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
2.1 pix Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
15.2 mag. Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qnwFkcexhX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4261, bad_region=11884, passed=76012
Got 76012 stars (including 60384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76012 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1515 n_q2=990 n_q3=1482 n_q4=924 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.oRPL835utX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4004, bad_region=10394, passed=74047
Got 74047 stars (including 60186 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1546 n_q2=870 n_q3=1588 n_q4=906 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jfVipfL5C2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=4516, bad_region=8893, passed=62124
Got 62124 stars (including 50338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62124 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=6.817 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.885 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.885 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.452 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.643 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.643 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.409 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.571 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.571 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4900 robust_rms_before=0.830 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.390 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.409 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.620 worst_region_rms_after=0.571 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.053 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.571
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.620 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.620 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.390 arcsec matched=4900
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.416 n_q1=1630 n_q2=909 n_q3=1597 n_q4=764 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zqDj3TWsia (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=4375, bad_region=8873, passed=62256
Got 62256 stars (including 50516 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62256 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=6.925 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.479 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.479 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.444 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.682 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.682 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.589 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.589 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4904 robust_rms_before=0.837 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.393 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.404 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.668 worst_region_rms_after=0.589 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.061 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.589
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.837 -> 0.404 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4904 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4777 pairs (4904 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=6.912 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.350 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.350 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.443 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.676 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.676 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.583 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.583 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4777 robust_rms_before=0.403 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.403 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.586 worst_region_rms_after=0.583 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.586 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.583
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.403 -> 0.403 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is a symbolic link
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=1588 n_q2=865 n_q3=1567 n_q4=757 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-05_CI_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_002431_TTUQ2b1x1_3233068_brMsZa0l/wcs_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:18:57.67 -19:32:52.4: 13.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:12.98 -20:11:11.7: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:10:39.23 -15:15:12.9: 12.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:40:48.95 -20:58:02.7: 13.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:50.19 -20:03:46.5: 14.10 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:18:57.24 -14:18:21.1: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:22:25.75 -15:19:56.2: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:22:40.79 -20:28:32.0: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:22:16.93 -15:49:37.4: 13.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:40:48.95 -20:58:02.7: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:22:25.75 -15:19:56.2: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:12.98 -20:11:11.7: 13.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:50.19 -20:03:46.5: 14.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:32:27.05 -16:36:04.1: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:22:16.93 -15:49:37.4: 15.03 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:48.95 -20:58:02.7: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8005 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:10:39.23 -15:15:12.9: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:12.98 -20:11:11.7: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7767 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:25.75 -15:19:56.2: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3276 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:50.19 -20:03:46.5: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3118 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:16.93 -15:49:37.4: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8435 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:39.23 -15:15:12.9: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4827 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:18:57.67 -19:32:52.4: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:18:57.24 -14:18:21.1: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:57.67 -19:32:52.4: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8865 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:57.24 -14:18:21.1: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7687 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:22:40.79 -20:28:32.0: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:32:27.05 -16:36:04.1: 13.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:27.05 -16:36:04.1: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8094 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:32:34.36 -21:31:28.2: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:32:50.47 -19:00:50.5: 13.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:37:41.27 -20:51:02.0: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:36:07.56 -17:01:15.9: 14.06 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:03.07 -21:57:38.2: 14.44 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:42:59.21 -21:26:36.5: 15.10 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:47.60 -21:54:54.7: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:09:16.18 -20:40:29.0: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:32:34.36 -21:31:28.2: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:32:50.47 -19:00:50.5: 14.07 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:37:41.27 -20:51:02.0: 14.33 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:36:07.56 -17:01:15.9: 14.32 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:50.47 -19:00:50.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0429 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:07.56 -17:01:15.9: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2230 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:46.09 -14:43:13.9: 14.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:47.60 -21:54:54.7: 14.71 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:41.27 -20:51:02.0: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1791 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:03.07 -21:57:38.2: 14.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:47.60 -21:54:54.7: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2418 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:03.07 -21:57:38.2: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1418 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:42:59.21 -21:26:36.5: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:59.21 -21:26:36.5: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.1528 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:09:16.18 -20:40:29.0: 15.02 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:16.18 -20:40:29.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9132 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:46.09 -14:43:13.9: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:46.09 -14:43:13.9: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3469 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:31.65 -22:07:51.9: 14.33 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:37.23 -21:19:25.8: 14.54 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:13.47 -19:37:48.1: 14.49 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:43:47.71 -22:06:02.0: 14.88 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:17.11 -18:59:19.9: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:28.61 -19:05:16.2: 14.47 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:11.59 -22:09:17.2: 14.48 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:37.23 -21:19:25.8: 14.71 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:37.23 -21:19:25.8: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2564 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:13.47 -19:37:48.1: 14.95 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:13.47 -19:37:48.1: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2548 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:31.65 -22:07:51.9: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:31.65 -22:07:51.9: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1820 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:43:47.71 -22:06:02.0: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:17.11 -18:59:19.9: 14.35 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:47.71 -22:06:02.0: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1530 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:17.11 -18:59:19.9: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2144 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:28.61 -19:05:16.2: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:54.89 -20:43:35.2: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:28.61 -19:05:16.2: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2248 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:11.59 -22:09:17.2: 14.43 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:11.59 -22:09:17.2: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3368 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:54.89 -20:43:35.2: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:54.89 -20:43:35.2: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1667 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:29:03.25 -22:03:21.4: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:41:15.22 -20:28:04.5: 14.84 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:39:58.66 -21:46:13.5: 14.74 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:42:05.56 -22:06:55.7: 14.27 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:41:18.37 -21:54:18.2: 14.64 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:27:09.18 -20:57:41.2: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:38:29.57 -21:56:44.5: 14.98 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:29:03.25 -22:03:21.4: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:42:05.56 -22:06:55.7: 14.92 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:39:58.66 -21:46:13.5: 14.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:03.25 -22:03:21.4: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2257 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:41:15.22 -20:28:04.5: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:05.56 -22:06:55.7: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3105 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:58.66 -21:46:13.5: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2255 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:15.22 -20:28:04.5: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2815 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:41:18.37 -21:54:18.2: 14.74 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:27:09.18 -20:57:41.2: 14.37 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:18.37 -21:54:18.2: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2443 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:09.18 -20:57:41.2: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2594 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:39.05 -22:02:18.7: 14.54 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:38:29.57 -21:56:44.5: 14.77 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:29.57 -21:56:44.5: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3064 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:39.05 -22:02:18.7: 14.58 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:39.05 -22:02:18.7: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2929 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:39:20.62 -15:25:08.9: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:38:44.56 -22:08:43.9: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:43.54 -21:22:02.3: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:43:58.25 -19:45:16.5: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:34:34.10 -21:54:33.7: 14.79 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:04.07 -22:06:37.5: 14.67 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:48.57 -21:16:39.0: 15.30 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:39:20.62 -15:25:08.9: 15.34 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:43.54 -21:22:02.3: 14.65 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:20.62 -15:25:08.9: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4055 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:38:44.56 -22:08:43.9: 14.60 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:43.54 -21:22:02.3: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2776 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:44.56 -22:08:43.9: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2229 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:43:58.25 -19:45:16.5: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:58.25 -19:45:16.5: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2179 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:34:34.10 -21:54:33.7: 14.89 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:04.07 -22:06:37.5: 14.90 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:34.10 -21:54:33.7: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3349 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:04.07 -22:06:37.5: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2099 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:37:23.06 -20:45:10.5: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:48.57 -21:16:39.0: 14.45 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:48.57 -21:16:39.0: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3401 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:37:23.06 -20:45:10.5: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:23.06 -20:45:10.5: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2781 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:41.84 -22:09:40.0: 14.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:41:08.64 -20:36:59.3: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:43:45.41 -20:45:51.1: 14.57 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:41:48.43 -22:05:53.2: 14.65 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:25:28.11 -20:29:56.6: 14.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:43:57.72 -20:04:56.8: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:41:58.64 -21:43:10.1: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:41:08.64 -20:36:59.3: 14.94 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:43:45.41 -20:45:51.1: 14.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:08.64 -20:36:59.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5014 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:45.41 -20:45:51.1: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5188 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:41.84 -22:09:40.0: 14.79 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:41.84 -22:09:40.0: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4076 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:41:48.43 -22:05:53.2: 14.89 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:48.43 -22:05:53.2: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3489 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:25:28.11 -20:29:56.6: 14.65 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:40:41.54 -22:10:21.1: 14.75 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:28.11 -20:29:56.6: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2274 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:43:57.72 -20:04:56.8: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:41:58.64 -21:43:10.1: 14.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:57.72 -20:04:56.8: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4879 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:58.64 -21:43:10.1: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4060 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:40:41.54 -22:10:21.1: 14.89 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:41.54 -22:10:21.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3586 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:39:01.81 -20:56:02.3: 14.78 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:41:26.88 -20:59:30.6: 14.66 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:40.26 -20:33:14.4: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:44:42.07 -20:09:39.8: 14.86 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:34:29.45 -19:22:30.7: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:38:39.10 -20:29:01.5: 14.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:39:23.88 -21:32:33.7: 14.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:39:01.81 -20:56:02.3: 15.01 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:01.81 -20:56:02.3: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5001 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:41:26.88 -20:59:30.6: 14.95 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:40.26 -20:33:14.4: 15.02 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:26.88 -20:59:30.6: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4889 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:40.26 -20:33:14.4: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4863 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:39:02.00 -21:55:27.2: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:34:29.45 -19:22:30.7: 14.71 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:44:42.07 -20:09:39.8: 14.88 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:38:39.10 -20:29:01.5: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:29.45 -19:22:30.7: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4579 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:42.07 -20:09:39.8: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5320 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:39.10 -20:29:01.5: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4809 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:39:23.88 -21:32:33.7: 14.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:23.88 -21:32:33.7: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4946 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:42:30.15 -20:51:46.7: 14.79 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:39:02.00 -21:55:27.2: 14.82 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:02.00 -21:55:27.2: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4581 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:42:30.15 -20:51:46.7: 14.80 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:30.15 -20:51:46.7: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4727 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:39:43.31 -20:21:29.3: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:37:23.46 -21:17:03.3: 14.90 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:45:16.62 -21:00:40.3: 14.75 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:39:22.28 -21:15:02.1: 14.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:37:35.66 -20:28:02.7: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:35:19.95 -21:34:44.7: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:39:07.48 -21:41:10.0: 14.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:39:43.31 -20:21:29.3: 14.57 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:37:23.46 -21:17:03.3: 14.90 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:43.31 -20:21:29.3: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4640 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:23.46 -21:17:03.3: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3610 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:45:16.62 -21:00:40.3: 14.73 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:31:44.59 -18:46:12.0: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:16.62 -21:00:40.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5943 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:42:27.60 -22:09:06.8: 14.73 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:39:22.28 -21:15:02.1: 14.67 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:22.28 -21:15:02.1: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2945 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:37:35.66 -20:28:02.7: 14.59 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:35.66 -20:28:02.7: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4675 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:35:19.95 -21:34:44.7: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:19.95 -21:34:44.7: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3724 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:41:30.49 -21:58:08.3: 14.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:39:07.48 -21:41:10.0: 14.89 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:07.48 -21:41:10.0: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3665 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:31:44.59 -18:46:12.0: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:42:27.60 -22:09:06.8: 14.75 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:27.60 -22:09:06.8: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4198 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:44.59 -18:46:12.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5485 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:41:30.49 -21:58:08.3: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:30.49 -21:58:08.3: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4879 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:41:05.25 -21:44:25.3: 14.43 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:32:32.98 -21:13:17.0: 14.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:22:17.59 -16:22:01.6: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:25:06.22 -22:00:00.9: 14.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:32:32.98 -21:13:17.0: 14.76 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:41:05.25 -21:44:25.3: 14.99 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:32.98 -21:13:17.0: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4574 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:05.25 -21:44:25.3: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4527 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:22:17.59 -16:22:01.6: 14.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:17.59 -16:22:01.6: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4854 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:25:06.22 -22:00:00.9: 14.81 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:06.22 -22:00:00.9: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3480 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-53-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:19:51.92 -15:17:20.1: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-00-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 20:19:51.92 -15:17:20.1: 13.74 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:51.92 -15:17:20.1: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5937 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100930.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94617.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91999_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 91999_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92005_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 92005_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92013_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 92013_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92017_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 92017_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92023_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 92023_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92026_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 92026_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94617_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
Preparing report for the candidate 94617_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95604_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 95604_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96797_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 96797_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:44.66 -20:54:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99955_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 99955_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100046_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 100046_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100930_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
Preparing report for the candidate 100930_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101077_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 101077_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101764_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 101764_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101765_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 101765_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101803_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 101803_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101833_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 101833_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102023_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102023_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102052_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102052_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102470_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102470_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102528_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102528_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102560_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102560_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102599_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102599_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102656_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102656_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102710_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102710_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102756_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102756_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102809_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102809_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102835_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102835_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102916_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102916_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102924_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102924_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102935_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102935_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102942_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102942_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102990_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 102990_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103031_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103031_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103169_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103169_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103186_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103186_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103187_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103187_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103208_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103208_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103248_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103248_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103287_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103287_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103364_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103364_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103377_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103377_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103401_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103401_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103491_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103491_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103613_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103613_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103649_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103649_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103662_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103662_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103687_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103687_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103806_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103806_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103821_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103821_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103870_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103870_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103879_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103879_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103898_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103898_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103937_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103937_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103997_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 103997_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104090_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104090_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104096_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104096_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104105_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104105_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104136_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104136_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104183_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104183_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104193_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104193_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104203_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104203_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104228_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104228_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104239_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104239_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104319_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104319_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104333_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104333_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104335_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104335_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104352_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104352_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104394_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104394_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104519_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104519_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104531_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104531_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104545_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104545_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104586_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104586_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104597_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 104597_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105082_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 105082_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27788_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 27788_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:20.14 -19:01:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07340_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 07340_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:29.12 -21:58:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86900_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 86900_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:26:13.28 -13:48:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86233_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 86233_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62252_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 62252_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:18.50 -14:16:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32988_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 32988_fd_Cap-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-05_00-23-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks