This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2006 2461318.7006 12.23 05:03:22.85 +26:02:34.8
177.15374 -9.38113 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -1 0 1 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:03:22.85 +26:02:34.8: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:03:22.85 +26:02:34.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2006* 05 03 22.85 +26 02 34.8 12.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7006,12.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2006 12.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2006 2461318.7006 13.25 04:39:14.98 +28:51:10.1
171.53148 -11.83224 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana 0 -0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:39:14.98 +28:51:10.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:39:14.98 +28:51:10.1: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2006* 04 39 14.98 +28 51 10.1 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7006,13.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2006 13.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2006 2461318.7006 13.59 04:32:52.65 +25:39:45.8
173.07772 -14.98176 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia 0 -0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:32:52.65 +25:39:45.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:32:52.65 +25:39:45.8: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2006* 04 32 52.65 +25 39 45.8 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7006,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2006 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2006 2461318.7006 13.78 05:11:38.04 +29:49:18.5
175.16272 -5.67905 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.359 Georgia -0 -0 0 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:11:38.04 +29:49:18.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:11:38.04 +29:49:18.5: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7006,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2006 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2006 2461318.7006 14.21 04:44:06.61 +34:25:15.3
167.90612 -7.43857 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.573 Recha 0 -0 0 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:44:06.61 +34:25:15.3: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:44:06.61 +34:25:15.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7006,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2006 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2006 2461318.7006 14.38 04:43:48.48 +30:49:15.7
170.64854 -9.80767 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1189 Terentia 1 0 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:43:48.48 +30:49:15.7: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:43:48.48 +30:49:15.7: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461318.7006,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261005.2006 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2006 2461318.7006 13.39 05:26:50.17 +24:45:21.6
181.27987 -5.77757 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" CSS 150316:052650+244517
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.200 CV 16.100 CV C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:26:50.17 +24:45:21.6: 14.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:26:50.17 +24:45:21.6: 14.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2006* 05 26 50.17 +24 45 21.6 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CSS 150316:052650+244517,2461318.7006,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CSS 150316:052650+244517 20261005.2006 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2006 2461318.7006 12.85 05:31:18.47 +27:30:55.1
179.51855 -3.42409 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ZTF J053118.68+273055.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.551 r Y 0.526 r 2458379.21980 325.939804000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:31:18.47 +27:30:55.1: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:31:18.47 +27:30:55.1: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2006* 05 31 18.47 +27 30 55.1 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J053118.68+273055.1,2461318.7006,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J053118.68+273055.1 20261005.2006 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 05.2006 2461318.7006 13.56 05:22:01.66 +26:59:31.7
178.80846 -5.43063 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ZTF J052201.65+265931.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.124 g Y 0.860 g 2458286.74940 431.490461800000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:22:01.66 +26:59:31.7: 14.70 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:22:01.66 +26:59:31.7: 14.66 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 05.2006* 05 22 01.66 +26 59 31.7 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J052201.65+265931.3,2461318.7006,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J052201.65+265931.3 20261005.2006 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461318.70095573 05.10.2026 04:49:12.575 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 57 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15327
Objects passed selection criteria: 15289
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12763.2
Average stars matched: 12430.8 (97.3949 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246368 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 01:02:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461318.70095573 05.10.2026 04:49:12.575 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 148
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 139 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 117371
Objects passed selection criteria: 117159
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 94004.2
Average stars matched: 90520 (96.2935 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 578492 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Oct 4 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-232-g1547b37e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 5 01:06:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461318.70022500
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:13.354 +29:56:33.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:13.354 +29:56:33.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0682 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Image size: 945.1'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:10.886 +29:57:07.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:10.886 +29:57:07.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0552 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:13.354 +29:56:33.40
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:10.886 +29:57:07.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01306 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x0zxhilqq1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xvaXEgKpMH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wqZDIrPMZw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GgbtG3MRc8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.x0zxhilqq1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xvaXEgKpMH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wqZDIrPMZw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=385, bad_region=0, passed=9328
Got 9328 stars (including 8935 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9328 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=9.982 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.993 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.993 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.794 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.313 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.000 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.515 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.702 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.702 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4781 robust_rms_before=1.601 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.518 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.515 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.734 worst_region_rms_after=0.702 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.030 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.702
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.734 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.734 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.518 arcsec matched=4781
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.559 n_q1=744 n_q2=877 n_q3=1133 n_q4=2027 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GgbtG3MRc8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=395, bad_region=0, passed=9396
Got 9396 stars (including 8994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9396 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5251)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=10.021 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.576 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.576 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.794 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.262 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.048 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.504 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.699 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.699 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4777 robust_rms_before=1.589 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.507 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.504 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.705 worst_region_rms_after=0.699 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.902 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.699
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.705 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.705 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.507 arcsec matched=4777
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.548 n_q1=743 n_q2=880 n_q3=1124 n_q4=2030 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits sigma_overall=0.518 worst_q_ratio=1.270
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits sigma_overall=0.512 worst_q_ratio=1.170
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196_astrometric_residuals.png (4781 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197_astrometric_residuals.png (4777 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 21119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:55.68 +30:10:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21186_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 21186_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.23 +31:27:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21195_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 21195_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.31 +32:10:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21215_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 21215_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.51 +28:42:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21247_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 21247_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.34 +34:07:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21251_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 21251_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.87 +34:09:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.41 +35:03:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.42 +26:08:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.35 +34:08:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.63 +30:42:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:13.354 +29:56:33.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:13.354 +29:56:33.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0682 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Image size: 945.1'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:10.886 +29:57:07.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:10.886 +29:57:07.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0552 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:13.354 +29:56:33.40
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:10.886 +29:57:07.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01306 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1Fguh54BJT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GPUG78igKa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KjyHfO7orm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UT3WCBhNAe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6881 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 133 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1Fguh54BJT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1871 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GPUG78igKa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KjyHfO7orm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3279, bad_region=44, passed=60128
Got 60128 stars (including 56728 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=10.083 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.471 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.471 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.794 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.298 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.979 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.513 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.693 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.693 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4780 robust_rms_before=1.590 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.509 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.513 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.728 worst_region_rms_after=0.693 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.005 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.693
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.728 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.728 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.509 arcsec matched=4780
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits N_match=4780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.652 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.543 n_q1=771 n_q2=864 n_q3=1177 n_q4=1968 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.302
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UT3WCBhNAe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=3342, bad_region=44, passed=60489
Got 60489 stars (including 57030 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5253)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=10.180 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.702 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.702 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.784 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.261 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.022 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.691 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.691 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=1.567 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.498 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.497 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.671 worst_region_rms_after=0.691 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.911 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.691
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.671 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.671 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.498 arcsec matched=4779
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.547 n_q1=771 n_q2=864 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1969 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-48-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_235008_TTUQ1b1x1_3173032_gCOWThI0/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:18:53.22 +30:51:18.0: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:22.67 +25:57:14.3: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:24:39.79 +34:02:58.5: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:03:44.74 +32:09:19.1: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:45.38 +26:54:16.9: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:35:12.21 +26:39:35.0: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:18:53.22 +30:51:18.0: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:24:39.79 +34:02:58.5: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:35:12.21 +26:39:35.0: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:18:53.22 +30:51:18.0: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6121 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:39.79 +34:02:58.5: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7438 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:12.21 +26:39:35.0: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9044 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:22.67 +25:57:14.3: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:45.38 +26:54:16.9: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:22.67 +25:57:14.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2484 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:45.38 +26:54:16.9: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0887 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:09:31.46 +32:34:08.2: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:03:44.74 +32:09:19.1: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:44.74 +32:09:19.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0200 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:09:31.46 +32:34:08.2: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:31.46 +32:34:08.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2468 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:45.16 +24:36:35.3: 10.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:45.16 +24:36:35.3: 10.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.72 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:45.16 +24:36:35.3: ref_mag=10.72 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7140 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:00.19 +24:42:34.4: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:15.73 +24:22:23.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:03:22.85 +26:02:34.8: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:00.19 +24:42:34.4: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:00.19 +24:42:34.4: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6042 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:53.05 +24:42:47.6: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:15.73 +24:22:23.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:15.73 +24:22:23.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:03:22.85 +26:02:34.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:53.05 +24:42:47.6: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:53.05 +24:42:47.6: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9493 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:42.84 +24:34:23.8: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:42.84 +24:34:23.8: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:42.84 +24:34:23.8: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3075 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:39:14.98 +28:51:10.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:31:50.14 +24:32:25.4: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:54.04 +24:35:16.9: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:09:49.73 +29:48:27.1: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:50.05 +29:58:33.9: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:39:14.98 +28:51:10.1: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:31:50.14 +24:32:25.4: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:50.14 +24:32:25.4: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5377 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:54.04 +24:35:16.9: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:54.04 +24:35:16.9: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7608 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:09:49.73 +29:48:27.1: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:49.73 +29:48:27.1: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1198 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:50.05 +29:58:33.9: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:50.05 +29:58:33.9: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2834 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:25:19.26 +34:34:24.1: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:24.47 +24:38:57.5: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:32:52.65 +25:39:45.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:03.22 +24:56:03.1: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:25:19.26 +34:34:24.1: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:19.26 +34:34:24.1: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3527 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:24.47 +24:38:57.5: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:32:52.65 +25:39:45.8: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:24.47 +24:38:57.5: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0306 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:55.85 +24:39:16.8: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:03.22 +24:56:03.1: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:03.22 +24:56:03.1: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9307 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:55.85 +24:39:16.8: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:21.16 +24:36:31.7: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:55.85 +24:39:16.8: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1176 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:52.71 +24:46:58.9: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:21.16 +24:36:31.7: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:21.16 +24:36:31.7: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0089 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:52.71 +24:46:58.9: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:52.71 +24:46:58.9: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2422 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:11:38.04 +29:49:18.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:44:06.61 +34:25:15.3: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:43:48.48 +30:49:15.7: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:11:38.04 +29:49:18.5: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:44:06.61 +34:25:15.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:43:48.48 +30:49:15.7: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:26:50.17 +24:45:21.6: 14.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:26:50.17 +24:45:21.6: 14.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:26:50.17 +24:45:21.6: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3892 delta=1.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:31:18.47 +27:30:55.1: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:31:18.47 +27:30:55.1: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:31:18.47 +27:30:55.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8505 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:22:01.66 +26:59:31.7: 14.70 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:22:01.66 +26:59:31.7: 14.66 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:22:01.66 +26:59:31.7: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5654 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110580.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out120278.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151449.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151715.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151933.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152187.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152255.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152314.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94186.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 10s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151104_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151104_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:38.65 +33:02:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151108_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151108_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151112_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151112_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:19.69 +33:19:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:56.53 +32:25:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151143_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151143_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151146_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151146_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151149_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151149_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:36.98 +33:23:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151152_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151152_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151155_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151155_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:30.12 +30:16:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151158_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151158_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.00 +26:11:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151159_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151159_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:04.42 +29:46:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151228_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151228_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151234_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151234_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.23 +31:27:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151290_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151290_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.84 +33:05:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151327_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151327_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.88 +34:09:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151344_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151344_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.30 +34:07:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151366_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151366_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151409_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151409_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.09 +34:07:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151415_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151415_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.53 +34:49:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.91 +33:06:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151441_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151441_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151449_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 151449_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151467_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151467_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.69 +34:23:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151475_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151475_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.55 +31:23:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151478_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151478_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:32.96 +28:37:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151480_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151480_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151498_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151498_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:25.01 +30:30:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151509_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151509_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:22.01 +28:31:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151540_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151540_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.70 +32:33:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151542_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151542_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151611_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151611_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.49 +34:06:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151627_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151627_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:46.06 +26:25:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151633_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151633_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.74 +26:10:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151652_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151652_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.03 +32:26:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151664_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151664_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.29 +34:24:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151679_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151679_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151715_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 151715_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151749_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151749_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.35 +31:44:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151768_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151768_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.85 +29:47:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151824_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151824_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151826_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151826_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151828_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151828_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:36.61 +30:33:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151831_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151831_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:45.77 +30:29:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151833_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151833_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.73 +29:45:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151834_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151834_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.91 +33:11:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151843_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151843_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:17.51 +31:00:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151871_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151871_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:35.86 +31:24:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151880_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151880_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:46.92 +29:10:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151887_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151887_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:27.63 +34:00:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151904_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151904_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:18.25 +33:59:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151923_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151923_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151929_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151929_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151933_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 151933_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151943_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151943_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151964_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151964_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:28.10 +30:16:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151974_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151974_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.67 +30:48:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151988_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 151988_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:42.89 +34:09:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152005_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 152005_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152036_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 152036_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152069_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 152069_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.17 +31:04:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 152087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152105_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 152105_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:56.91 +33:57:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152116_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 152116_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:17.26 +33:06:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152129_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 152129_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:52.75 +32:19:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152130_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 152130_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:38.98 +32:11:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152137_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 152137_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:22.17 +31:25:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152147_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 152147_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.79 +30:49:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152149_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 152149_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:01.12 +34:10:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152187_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 152187_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 152196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:47.78 +30:15:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152236_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 152236_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:07.53 +34:19:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152254_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 152254_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:43.95 +34:50:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152255_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 152255_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152314_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 152314_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87999_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 87999_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:20.37 +29:14:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121933_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 121933_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:55.68 +30:10:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:14.21 +32:02:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128243_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 128243_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:51.38 +28:31:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.52 +31:18:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10830_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 10830_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33540_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 33540_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 95878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:44.26 +24:57:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94186_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 94186_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.31 +32:10:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:50.95 +26:46:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:21.18 +30:48:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 120278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 61400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:02.75 +30:45:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.44 +26:45:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 141164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:25.97 +29:15:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141055_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 141055_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:59.62 +30:06:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:52.93 +30:33:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140162_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 140162_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:12.58 +34:32:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:08.99 +25:22:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110580_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 110580_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.35 +25:24:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:38.55 +28:39:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 96598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.11 +25:01:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37569_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 37569_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:08.77 +32:28:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.52 +28:42:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:11.40 +33:50:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:53.72 +27:26:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34872_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 34872_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:27.09 +32:51:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 49024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:25.01 +31:53:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.31 +25:58:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.40 +35:03:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 39496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:17.69 +32:11:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21097_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 21097_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:11.15 +33:20:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.43 +26:08:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 103136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:36.65 +25:59:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:49.95 +30:05:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27558_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 27558_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.40 +33:11:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.47 +27:22:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:26.29 +31:29:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 77691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:23.11 +29:29:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:08.27 +27:03:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96408_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 96408_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:58.84 +25:08:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92956_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 92956_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:42.74 +24:38:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 66229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:56.06 +30:38:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113860_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 113860_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:05.04 +27:11:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23625_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 23625_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:36.23 +33:24:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:49.62 +34:37:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.34 +29:42:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63791_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 63791_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:28.81 +30:37:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.38 +34:08:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.62 +30:42:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:20.02 +34:08:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_23-49-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
