######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 381622 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 381622 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits

renamed 'UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 440.9575
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 445.9569
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1306.6342
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 427.3189
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1310.5015
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 415.0231
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.96317
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.030
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 17.1900005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-04T22:28:12.6568209' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-05T03:28:12.6568209' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61318.1445909259 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-05T03:28:22.5610335' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61318.144705567 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 205.713638450202 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9997672845467 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 17.7808333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 334.092222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.24326979465263 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20690 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20690 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.1900005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.1900005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 84.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 909.79 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 329.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.400112 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits :)
Spent 0.806576 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 17.2399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-04T22:29:02.3973596' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-05T03:29:02.3973596' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61318.1451666318 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-05T03:29:12.2992108' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61318.1452812385 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 205.713638454413 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9997673476201 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 17.705 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 334.158333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.25642019803117 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20690 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20690 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.2399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.2399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 84.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 909.79 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 329.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.400112 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits :)
Spent 0.787118 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits

fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461318.64470667
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:48.036 +61:59:50.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:48.036 +61:59:50.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0105 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:49.437 +62:00:26.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:49.437 +62:00:26.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0029 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:42:48.036 +61:59:50.74
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:49.437 +62:00:26.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01027 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gAKKODGtwA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QwUa422pHx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eprNZOAhbI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NVRxc4w3Qp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.653700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.653700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec +55.8887 to +67.2580 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec 55.8887 to 67.2580 deg
Loaded 6076 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3951 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 6522 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.4 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.gAKKODGtwA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, bad_region=1498, passed=6503
Got 6503 stars (including 4695 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4578 stars left (next iteration limit 5035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4578 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=1515 n_q2=886 n_q3=1433 n_q4=744 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QwUa422pHx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, bad_region=1501, passed=6522
Got 6522 stars (including 4694 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4577 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4577 stars left (next iteration limit 5034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4577 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=1530 n_q2=880 n_q3=1434 n_q4=733 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.eprNZOAhbI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=252, bad_region=137, passed=3436
Got 3436 stars (including 3052 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3436 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 2968 stars left (next iteration limit 3264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2968 robust_rms=5.942 arcsec worst_region_rms=8.543 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=7.706 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2968 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.545 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.545 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2968 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.448 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.448 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2968 robust_rms_before=1.005 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.365 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.446 worst_region_rms_after=0.448 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.177 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.448
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.446 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.446 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.365 arcsec matched=2968
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=2968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=1184 n_q2=463 n_q3=1078 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NVRxc4w3Qp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=218, bad_region=79, passed=3296
Got 3296 stars (including 2999 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 2921 stars left (next iteration limit 3214)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2921 robust_rms=6.002 arcsec worst_region_rms=8.869 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=7.981 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2921 robust_rms=0.485 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.540 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.538 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2921 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.456 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.456 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2921 robust_rms_before=0.944 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.346 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.373 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.436 worst_region_rms_after=0.456 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.072 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.456
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.436 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.436 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.346 arcsec matched=2921
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=2921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.407 n_q1=1192 n_q2=444 n_q3=1053 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits sigma_overall=0.356 worst_q_ratio=1.185
ref2=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.191
new1=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.125
new2=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.145
reference average sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.188
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179_astrometric_residuals.png (4578 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180_astrometric_residuals.png (4577 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (2968 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (2921 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:48.036 +61:59:50.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:48.036 +61:59:50.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0105 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:49.437 +62:00:26.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:49.437 +62:00:26.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0029 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:42:48.036 +61:59:50.74
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:49.437 +62:00:26.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01027 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TGREkTw4DL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FBELZtNXIS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pgGtvUhsdv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XJDbYMZ9vS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg
Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.529000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.529000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.91
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg
Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 33636 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec +55.8888 to +67.2587 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec 55.8888 to 67.2587 deg
Loaded 6169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3802 out of 4121 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4121 out of 33636 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 33 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.2 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.0 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
15.3 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
15.3 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.TGREkTw4DL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1409, bad_region=6082, passed=33797
Got 33797 stars (including 26535 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33797 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1628 n_q2=986 n_q3=1423 n_q4=845 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FBELZtNXIS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=1410, bad_region=6001, passed=33607
Got 33607 stars (including 26445 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33607 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1633 n_q2=987 n_q3=1424 n_q4=837 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pgGtvUhsdv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=668, bad_region=622, passed=20449
Got 20449 stars (including 19179 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20449 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5319)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=5.730 arcsec worst_region_rms=8.497 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=7.847 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=0.490 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.561 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.561 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.451 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.451 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4836 robust_rms_before=1.014 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.378 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.394 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.455 worst_region_rms_after=0.451 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.165 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.451
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.455 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.455 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.378 arcsec matched=4836
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=1976 n_q2=719 n_q3=1754 n_q4=387 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XJDbYMZ9vS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=634, bad_region=440, passed=20062
Got 20062 stars (including 18980 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20062 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4831 stars left (next iteration limit 5314)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=5.775 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.026 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=7.938 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.491 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.564 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.564 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.463 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.463 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4831 robust_rms_before=0.946 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.363 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.389 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.451 worst_region_rms_after=0.463 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.058 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.463
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.451 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.451 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.363 arcsec matched=4831
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4831 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1991 n_q2=708 n_q3=1757 n_q4=375 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:34:27.28 +58:57:24.5: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:27:41.24 +59:05:21.1: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:26:57.95 +58:09:04.1: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:26:57.95 +58:09:04.1: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:27:41.24 +59:05:21.1: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:34:27.28 +58:57:24.5: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:27:41.24 +59:05:21.1: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5025 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:26:57.95 +58:09:04.1: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2418 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:27.28 +58:57:24.5: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2818 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:33:12.95 +58:17:42.2: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:35:11.08 +59:05:37.7: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:23:08.22 +59:17:29.1: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:23:56.94 +58:27:28.3: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:37:41.07 +60:46:04.4: 14.52 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:35:11.08 +59:05:37.7: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:11.08 +59:05:37.7: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6585 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:33:12.95 +58:17:42.2: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:12.95 +58:17:42.2: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1161 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:23:08.22 +59:17:29.1: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:23:56.94 +58:27:28.3: 14.54 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:08.22 +59:17:29.1: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0912 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:56.94 +58:27:28.3: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3245 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:37:41.07 +60:46:04.4: 14.69 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:32:17.16 +60:27:52.1: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:41.07 +60:46:04.4: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6640 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:41:34.70 +62:48:03.9: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:24:16.96 +60:44:49.7: 14.85 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:28:48.58 +58:55:53.0: 15.27 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:32:17.16 +60:27:52.1: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:32:17.16 +60:27:52.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7120 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:34:40.78 +57:45:18.8: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:41:34.70 +62:48:03.9: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:34.70 +62:48:03.9: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7726 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:30:56.07 +59:58:11.1: 15.36 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:21:03.36 +57:39:39.9: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:24:16.96 +60:44:49.7: 15.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:24:16.96 +60:44:49.7: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6123 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:28:48.58 +58:55:53.0: 15.19 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:28:48.58 +58:55:53.0: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7954 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:34:40.78 +57:45:18.8: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:43:02.92 +63:22:11.6: 15.14 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:41:02.01 +62:41:14.9: 15.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:40.78 +57:45:18.8: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7907 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:21:03.36 +57:39:39.9: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:21:03.36 +57:39:39.9: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7008 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:30:56.07 +59:58:11.1: 15.56 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:30:56.07 +59:58:11.1: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8299 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:43:02.92 +63:22:11.6: 15.24 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:43:02.92 +63:22:11.6: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8932 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:23:50.02 +58:55:49.2: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:20:04.10 +59:19:11.3: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:41:02.01 +62:41:14.9: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:02.01 +62:41:14.9: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8245 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:27:33.65 +58:09:17.7: 15.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:20:34.33 +59:32:23.5: 15.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:07:13.43 +58:14:34.2: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:08:45.64 +64:51:05.6: 14.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:23:50.02 +58:55:49.2: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:50.02 +58:55:49.2: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5885 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:20:04.10 +59:19:11.3: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:27:33.65 +58:09:17.7: 15.18 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:20:04.10 +59:19:11.3: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8039 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:20:34.33 +59:32:23.5: 15.20 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:20:34.33 +59:32:23.5: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8282 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:27:33.65 +58:09:17.7: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6127 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:07:13.43 +58:14:34.2: 15.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:13.43 +58:14:34.2: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9080 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:08:45.64 +64:51:05.6: 15.28 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:45.64 +64:51:05.6: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8393 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51859_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 51859_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.45 | 14:34:27.33 +58:57:24.4 | 0798 4744 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.19 | 14:34:27.23 +58:57:24.6 | 0801 4751 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51866_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 51866_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 12.92 | 14:30:48.04 +62:45:36.6 | 1462 2512 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 14:30:48.06 +62:45:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51867_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 51867_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 12.25 | 14:26:57.95 +58:09:04.0 | 1310 5321 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 12.23 | 14:26:57.95 +58:09:04.3 | 1313 5328 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51904_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 51904_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 11.61 | 14:21:55.29 +62:15:59.7 | 2038 2898 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 14:21:55.24 +62:15:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51917_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 51917_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 12.04 | 14:23:38.75 +61:56:42.2 | 1891 3076 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 14:23:38.77 +61:56:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51946_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 51946_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 12.49 | 14:21:51.85 +62:16:15.6 | 2042 2896 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 14:21:51.90 +62:16:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51980_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 51980_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 12.72 | 14:17:02.72 +59:37:50.7 | 2206 4528 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 14:17:02.67 +59:37:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52083_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52083_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 13.50 | 14:27:41.18 +59:05:21.4 | 1340 4747 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 13.51 | 14:27:41.29 +59:05:20.8 | 1342 4753 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52211_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52211_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.35 | 14:27:39.71 +65:49:29.1 | 1957 0702 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 14:27:39.82 +65:49:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52212_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52212_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 13.91 | 14:15:00.80 +62:58:22.4 | 2567 2528 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 14:15:00.84 +62:58:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52219_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52219_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 13.89 | 14:24:29.26 +60:16:20.6 | 1691 4074 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 14:24:29.33 +60:16:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52226_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52226_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.09 | 14:23:08.34 +59:17:29.2 | 1710 4672 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.09 | 14:23:08.11 +59:17:29.0 | 1712 4679 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52228_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52228_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.10 | 14:33:12.95 +58:17:42.5 | 0825 5159 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.12 | 14:33:12.95 +58:17:41.9 | 0827 5166 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52262_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52262_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 13.88 | 13:45:41.88 +60:01:41.1 | 4599 4394 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 13:45:41.83 +60:01:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52293_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52293_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.34 | 14:23:56.89 +58:27:29.3 | 1578 5168 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.31 | 14:23:56.99 +58:27:27.2 | 1580 5175 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52342_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52342_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.60 | 14:35:11.02 +59:05:38.5 | 0757 4652 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.75 | 14:35:11.13 +59:05:37.0 | 0758 4659 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52368_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52368_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.66 | 14:37:40.96 +60:46:04.4 | 0756 3613 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.67 | 14:37:41.19 +60:46:04.5 | 0758 3620 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52370_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52370_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.60 | 14:32:17.15 +60:27:52.5 | 1123 3865 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.93 | 14:32:17.17 +60:27:51.7 | 1125 3872 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52379_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52379_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.69 | 14:41:34.92 +62:48:03.8 | 0721 2343 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.95 | 14:41:34.48 +62:48:04.0 | 0723 2350 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52392_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52392_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.60 | 14:24:17.18 +60:44:49.8 | 1743 3783 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.62 | 14:24:16.73 +60:44:49.7 | 1746 3790 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52406_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52406_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.70 | 14:28:48.41 +58:55:54.9 | 1237 4829 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.95 | 14:28:48.75 +58:55:51.1 | 1239 4836 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52419_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52419_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.79 | 14:34:40.69 +57:45:19.2 | 0649 5466 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.79 | 14:34:40.87 +57:45:18.3 | 0651 5473 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52420_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.73 | 14:30:55.96 +59:58:12.3 | 1175 4179 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 15.00 | 14:30:56.17 +59:58:10.0 | 1177 4186 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52436_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52436_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.49 | 14:20:25.48 +61:28:30.7 | 2085 3388 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 14:20:25.44 +61:28:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52447_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52447_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.71 | 14:21:03.37 +57:39:40.4 | 1746 5679 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.70 | 14:21:03.35 +57:39:39.4 | 1748 5686 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52455_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.82 | 14:43:02.89 +63:22:11.8 | 0692 1983 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 15.00 | 14:43:02.95 +63:22:11.3 | 0693 1989 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52459_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52459_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.82 | 14:41:01.85 +62:41:14.7 | 0745 2419 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.83 | 14:41:02.16 +62:41:15.1 | 0746 2426 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52464_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52464_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.74 | 14:20:04.12 +59:19:10.9 | 1950 4684 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.92 | 14:20:04.08 +59:19:11.7 | 1952 4690 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52479_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52479_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.77 | 14:23:50.05 +58:55:48.6 | 1626 4883 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.49 | 14:23:49.98 +58:55:49.8 | 1628 4890 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52486_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52486_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.83 | 14:27:33.69 +58:09:18.3 | 1263 5312 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.50 | 14:27:33.62 +58:09:17.1 | 1265 5319 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52529_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.80 | 14:20:34.28 +59:32:23.1 | 1927 4546 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.85 | 14:20:34.39 +59:32:24.0 | 1929 4553 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52543_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52543_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.88 | 14:07:13.38 +58:14:34.3 | 2894 5426 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.98 | 14:07:13.47 +58:14:34.2 | 2896 5433 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 52566_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 05.14471 | 2461318.64471 | 14.83 | 14:08:45.54 +64:51:05.2 | 3082 1424 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-28-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 05.14528 | 2461318.64528 | 14.85 | 14:08:45.73 +64:51:05.9 | 3083 1431 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_223132_TTUQ2b1x1_1655036_KTtkXRx6/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-04_22-29-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461318.64470667 -observatory V36
14:10:08.26 -15:28:58.1 Mercury (-0.0mag)
14:12:30.61 -21:09:18.2 Venus (-4.7mag)
08:25:10.83 +20:22:33.7 Mars (1.1mag)
09:30:12.68 +15:24:23.2 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:44:14.85 +01:48:21.5 Saturn (0.3mag)
04:12:39.96 +20:59:26.5 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:57.88 -00:21:37.3 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:17.06 -23:43:24.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
08:21:25.98 +21:06:51.8 Moon (-9.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 4 22:34 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461318.64470667:
09:30:19.12 +15:23:49.3 Io (9.6mag)
09:30:18.50 +15:23:53.6 Europa (6.2mag)
09:30:29.28 +15:22:53.5 Ganymede (8.1mag)
09:30:20.57 +15:23:42.2 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:29:29.99 +15:46:04.4 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:30:13.01 +15:24:21.9 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:28:31.11 +15:44:27.7 Elara (17.5mag)
09:33:00.92 +14:47:08.0 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:29:15.90 +15:49:50.8 Carme (18.9mag)
00:44:26.48 +01:48:12.3 Titan (8.2mag)
00:44:12.58 +01:48:03.6 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:43:36.18 +01:45:57.9 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:44:17.34 +01:48:38.8 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:42:37.85 +01:36:13.5 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 4 22:34 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461318.64470667:
02:05:46.35 +20:48:55.9 JWST
13:09:29.02 +54:40:32.1 Chandra
10:01:55.86 -55:46:06.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 4 22:34 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461318.64470667 -observatory V36
03:47:24.23 +20:09:07.0 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:19:24.61 -33:38:31.5 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:37:02.20 -71:59:37.3 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:25.38 +34:28:09.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:03:40.20 +48:14:27.1 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:27:30.16 +25:31:42.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:39.41 -18:03:41.9 15.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:58:41.93 +35:02:25.8 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:25:53.78 +41:49:10.1 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:45:31.57 -13:30:00.2 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:15:37.51 +12:31:51.0 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
12:05:36.10 +16:30:36.7 16.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:44:46.82 -02:11:48.4 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:17:10.36 +67:30:06.4 16.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:43:00.81 +44:06:39.9 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:39:39.22 +13:39:21.3 17.7mag A/2026 E1
00:41:44.53 +19:45:08.3 17.8mag 2P/Encke
22:51:35.75 -32:58:06.1 14.3mag 10P/Tempel
02:01:57.58 +39:28:02.6 16.9mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:07:01.72 -07:39:18.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:26:32.52 -08:38:53.5 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
07:27:03.39 +16:40:19.8 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
03:05:50.52 +14:36:47.2 17.5mag 88P/Howell
07:16:07.66 +38:23:30.1 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:47:39.35 +16:20:23.5 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:28:04.83 +14:41:20.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:51:12.66 -30:23:45.9 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:46:04.40 +19:34:43.6 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:36:31.29 +00:32:46.1 17.2mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
22:40:19.78 -02:20:29.4 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:05:17.08 +35:48:06.8 16.8mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:03:08.67 +03:11:36.3 13.7mag 169P/NEAT
03:31:58.70 +05:23:43.9 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:52:59.15 +43:48:35.1 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
07:17:34.97 +25:47:43.2 18.0mag 266P/Christensen
15:46:27.82 -03:15:16.0 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski
09:49:46.16 +32:01:31.9 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 4 22:34 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 4 22:34 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 4 22:34 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
02:30:40.630 +02:46:53.02 AT 2026acdo 2026-09-15.85 21.95
02:09:16.870 +01:28:36.92 AT 2026acdn 2026-09-15.84 22.4
01:52:25.390 -01:02:18.80 AT 2026acdm 2026-09-15.84 21.59
01:26:00.430 +05:11:07.70 AT 2026acdl 2026-09-13.85 22.3
00:59:21.730 +05:19:21.52 AT 2026acdk 2026-09-12.90 22.44
01:52:37.109 +00:19:05.30 AT 2026acdj 2026-09-12.77 22.53
01:45:08.290 +04:57:01.83 AT 2026acdi 2026-09-12.77 22.56
23:52:08.000 +02:30:09.80 AT 2026acdh 2026-09-12.74 22.38
23:00:43.000 +00:08:30.74 AT 2026acdg 2026-09-12.73 22.19
23:43:16.060 +01:40:02.02 AT 2026acdf 2026-09-10.84 22.6
01:56:12.660 +01:50:37.08 AT 2026acde 2026-09-10.77 22.48
01:20:44.400 +06:02:00.40 AT 2026acdd 2026-09-10.77 21.86
01:13:31.990 +04:24:23.63 AT 2026acdc 2026-09-10.76 22.79
01:15:03.600 +05:10:37.90 AT 2026acdb 2026-09-08.89 22.67
01:07:11.080 +05:05:45.33 AT 2026acda 2026-09-08.89 22.57
02:31:08.610 -00:16:42.93 AT 2026accz 2026-09-08.85 22.57
02:03:05.540 +01:55:47.58 AT 2026accy 2026-09-08.84 22.4
01:59:22.490 +00:05:02.08 AT 2026accx 2026-09-08.84 22.22
01:21:28.510 +02:30:23.28 AT 2026accw 2026-09-08.83 22.18
01:06:56.650 +00:08:23.74 AT 2026accv 2026-09-08.82 22.3
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 4 22:34 tns_transients_list.txt