This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2987 2461317.7987 12.36 05:54:54.14 +01:26:13.6
205.08335 -11.87755 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX23" Gaia DR3 3315785636655216512
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.920 G 19.130 G 0.243780000000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.181 Eucharis -1 1 1 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:54:54.14 +01:26:13.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:54:54.14 +01:26:13.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 04.2987* 05 54 54.14 +01 26 13.6 12.4 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3315785636655216512,2461317.7987,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3315785636655216512 20261004.2987 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2987 2461317.7987 12.94 06:10:43.34 +03:24:20.0
205.20523 -7.46474 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J092.6804+03.4050 | 06:10:43.34 +03:24:20.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) SpType: M4 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=1.472+/-0.030 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:10:43.34 +03:24:20.0: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:10:43.34 +03:24:20.0: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 04.2987* 06 10 43.34 +03 24 20.0 12.9 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J092.6804+03.4050,2461317.7987,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J092.6804+03.4050 20261004.2987 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2987 2461317.7987 12.29 06:06:38.45 +01:55:42.5
206.04229 -9.05674 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J060638.41+015541.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.520 V 13.740 V 2457413.00000 225.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:06:38.45 +01:55:42.5: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:06:38.45 +01:55:42.5: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 04.2987* 06 06 38.45 +01 55 42.5 12.3 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J060638.41+015541.6,2461317.7987,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J060638.41+015541.6 20261004.2987 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2987 2461317.7987 11.76 06:03:20.28 +04:16:59.2
203.54690 -8.67593 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0603203+041658
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.809 R1 Y 0.552 R1 126.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:03:20.28 +04:16:59.2: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:03:20.28 +04:16:59.2: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 04.2987* 06 03 20.28 +04 16 59.2 11.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0603203+041658,2461317.7987,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0603203+041658 20261004.2987 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2987 2461317.7987 12.77 06:22:19.78 +07:01:01.2
203.35841 -3.22077 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 12480911
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.725 r Y 1.024 r 2458383.17500 119.215685400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:22:19.78 +07:01:01.2: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:22:19.78 +07:01:01.2: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 12480911,2461317.7987,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 12480911 20261004.2987 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2987 2461317.7987 11.52 06:17:05.50 +05:28:09.8
204.11929 -5.09525 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J061705.49+052810.4
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.570 V 12.920 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:17:05.50 +05:28:09.8: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:17:05.50 +05:28:09.8: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 04.2987* 06 17 05.50 +05 28 09.8 11.5 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J061705.49+052810.4,2461317.7987,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J061705.49+052810.4 20261004.2987 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2987 2461317.7987 12.94 06:15:03.74 +04:44:14.7
204.53112 -5.88460 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS 12469933
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.423 g Y 0.274 g 2458206.72670 69.577525200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:15:03.74 +04:44:14.7: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:15:03.74 +04:44:14.7: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 04.2987* 06 15 03.74 +04 44 14.7 12.9 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 12469933,2461317.7987,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 12469933 20261004.2987 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2987 2461317.7987 12.88 06:11:57.09 +08:01:32.6
201.25214 -5.01534 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J061157.00+080131.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.930 V 14.520 V 2458389.17370 88.555142300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:11:57.09 +08:01:32.6: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:11:57.09 +08:01:32.6: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 04.2987* 06 11 57.09 +08 01 32.6 12.9 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J061157.00+080131.9,2461317.7987,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J061157.00+080131.9 20261004.2987 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2987 2461317.7987 12.96 05:56:45.77 +04:51:26.4
202.24423 -9.84283 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V2770 Ori
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.100 R1 12.700 R1 2451596.14000 57.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:56:45.77 +04:51:26.4: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:56:45.77 +04:51:26.4: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 04.2987* 05 56 45.77 +04 51 26.4 13.0 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2770 Ori,2461317.7987,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2770 Ori 20261004.2987 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2987 2461317.7987 12.99 05:53:52.23 +02:18:35.6
204.17322 -11.69201 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" Gaia DR3 3316101437009050496
Type: YSO
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.740 G 12.790 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:53:52.23 +02:18:35.6: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:53:52.23 +02:18:35.6: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 04.2987* 05 53 52.23 +02 18 35.6 13.0 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3316101437009050496,2461317.7987,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3316101437009050496 20261004.2987 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2987 2461317.7987 12.80 06:12:25.31 +07:10:44.7
202.05614 -5.31399 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J061225.28+071044.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.860 V 14.260 V 2458523.51260 68.566455600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:12:25.31 +07:10:44.7: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:12:25.31 +07:10:44.7: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 04.2987* 06 12 25.31 +07 10 44.7 12.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J061225.28+071044.3,2461317.7987,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J061225.28+071044.3 20261004.2987 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2987 2461317.7987 12.82 05:55:43.97 +01:56:30.3
204.72904 -11.45644 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J055543.99+015628.9
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.360 V 14.450 V 2457055.85000 12.395000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:55:43.97 +01:56:30.3: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:55:43.97 +01:56:30.3: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 04.2987* 05 55 43.97 +01 56 30.3 12.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J055543.99+015628.9,2461317.7987,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J055543.99+015628.9 20261004.2987 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.61632350 11.02.2026 02:47:20.350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461082.61632350 11.02.2026 02:47:20.350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461317.79902207 04.10.2026 07:10:25.507 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22428
Objects passed selection criteria: 22314
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15288
Average stars matched: 14818.8 (96.9306 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 247052 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Oct 3 04:56:41 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-231-g50972ca5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 4 02:18:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.61632350 11.02.2026 02:47:20.350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461082.61632350 11.02.2026 02:47:20.350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461317.79902207 04.10.2026 07:10:25.507 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 119
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 77 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 150845
Objects passed selection criteria: 150423
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 104534
Average stars matched: 100547 (96.1864 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 615772 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Oct 3 04:56:41 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-231-g50972ca5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 4 02:20:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461317.79840823
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Image size: 943.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.056 +05:59:57.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15
Second-epoch image center 06:00:00.056 +05:59:57.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0127 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
Image size: 943.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:58.520 +06:00:34.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15
Second-epoch image center 05:59:58.520 +06:00:34.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0175 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:00.056 +05:59:57.38
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:58.520 +06:00:34.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01207 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l2iu2Ys5JE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Scll10G81e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AMH372r9iZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uU2TVcUapI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23947 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9156 to 97.9251 deg, Dec +0.5852 to +11.3169 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9156 to 97.9251 deg, Dec 0.5852 to 11.3169 deg
Loaded 13838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10471 out of 11616 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11616 out of 23947 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.917600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.917600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23947 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9156 to 97.9251 deg, Dec +0.5852 to +11.3169 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9156 to 97.9251 deg, Dec 0.5852 to 11.3169 deg
Loaded 13838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10471 out of 11616 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11616 out of 23947 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23981 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9156 to 97.9135 deg, Dec +0.6076 to +11.3239 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9156 to 97.9135 deg, Dec 0.6076 to 11.3239 deg
Loaded 13821 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10495 out of 11630 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11630 out of 23981 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.3 pix Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
3.7 pix fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
3.6 pix fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.4 mag. Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.l2iu2Ys5JE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2599, bad_region=0, passed=23947
Got 23947 stars (including 21319 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23947 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=820 n_q2=1207 n_q3=1001 n_q4=1753 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Scll10G81e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2508, bad_region=0, passed=23981
Got 23981 stars (including 21438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23981 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits N_match=4780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=829 n_q2=1201 n_q3=1010 n_q4=1740 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.AMH372r9iZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, bad_region=0, passed=6597
Got 6597 stars (including 6276 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6597 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013103 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010482 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4731 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4731 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4731 stars left (next iteration limit 5203)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4731 robust_rms=10.397 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.499 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.499 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4731 robust_rms=0.657 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.052 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.052 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4731 robust_rms=0.447 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.684 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.684 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4731 robust_rms_before=1.107 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.492 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.447 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.727 worst_region_rms_after=0.684 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.439 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.684
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.727 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.727 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.492 arcsec matched=4731
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits N_match=4731 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.529 n_q1=799 n_q2=1242 n_q3=783 n_q4=1907 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uU2TVcUapI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=361, bad_region=0, passed=7015
Got 7015 stars (including 6652 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7015 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013101 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010481 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4734 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4731 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4733 stars left (next iteration limit 5206)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4733 robust_rms=9.087 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.752 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.752 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4733 robust_rms=0.644 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.011 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.011 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4733 robust_rms=0.431 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.675 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.675 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4733 robust_rms_before=1.107 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.478 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.431 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.754 worst_region_rms_after=0.675 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.512 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.675
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
Image size: 943.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:58.565 +06:00:33.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7015 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1559627.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.107 -> 0.431 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4733 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4472 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4472 pairs (4733 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4472 robust_rms=8.744 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.197 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.197 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4472 robust_rms=0.633 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.965 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.965 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4472 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.641 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.641 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4472 robust_rms_before=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.419 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.644 worst_region_rms_after=0.641 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.644 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.641
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
Image size: 943.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:58.565 +06:00:33.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7015 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1561326.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.419 -> 0.419 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4472 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4472 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits N_match=4472 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=838 n_q2=1144 n_q3=794 n_q4=1696 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits sigma_overall=0.442 worst_q_ratio=1.098
ref2=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.108
new1=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits sigma_overall=0.477 worst_q_ratio=1.127
new2=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits sigma_overall=0.439 worst_q_ratio=1.130
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.103
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032_astrometric_residuals.png (4781 matched stars from wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033_astrometric_residuals.png (4780 matched stars from wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079_astrometric_residuals.png (4731 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080_astrometric_residuals.png (4472 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31698_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 31698_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.43 +08:11:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05113_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 05113_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:44.94 +03:45:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03738_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 03738_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:28.33 +02:46:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10180_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 10180_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:03.50 +06:19:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01005_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 01005_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:45.18 +01:13:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07352_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 07352_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:11.88 +05:00:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11271_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 11271_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:37.20 +06:48:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12383_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 12383_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:20.11 +07:14:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04679_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 04679_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:41.58 +03:20:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ori-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Image size: 943.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.056 +05:59:57.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15
Second-epoch image center 06:00:00.056 +05:59:57.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0127 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
Image size: 943.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:58.565 +06:00:33.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15
Second-epoch image center 05:59:58.565 +06:00:33.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0174 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:00.056 +05:59:57.38
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:58.565 +06:00:33.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01177 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tJp8HYgeYr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aJuvnuobZq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KZSdjZ2Gih
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OafjEBvTWC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 165923 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9025 to 97.9258 deg, Dec +0.5713 to +11.3193 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9025 to 97.9258 deg, Dec 0.5713 to 11.3193 deg
Loaded 13864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8480 out of 12115 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12115 out of 165923 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.768800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.768800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 165923 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9025 to 97.9258 deg, Dec +0.5713 to +11.3193 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9025 to 97.9258 deg, Dec 0.5713 to 11.3193 deg
Loaded 13864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8480 out of 12115 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12115 out of 165923 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 164824 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.8906 to 97.9164 deg, Dec +0.5830 to +11.3271 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.8906 to 97.9164 deg, Dec 0.5830 to 11.3271 deg
Loaded 13866 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8525 out of 12126 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12126 out of 164824 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 107 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.1 pix Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
3.2 pix fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
3.2 pix fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.5 mag. Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tJp8HYgeYr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=50, blended=21856, bad_region=0, passed=165873
Got 165873 stars (including 143783 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 165873 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 165873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 165873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 165873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5262)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits N_match=4786 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=899 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1055 n_q4=1609 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aJuvnuobZq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=21523, bad_region=1, passed=164771
Got 164771 stars (including 143000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 164771 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4794 stars left (next iteration limit 5274)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits N_match=4794 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=916 n_q2=1211 n_q3=1057 n_q4=1610 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.056
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KZSdjZ2Gih (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2112, bad_region=17, passed=43772
Got 43772 stars (including 41606 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013103 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010482 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4798 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4720 stars left (next iteration limit 5190)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4720 robust_rms=10.761 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.789 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.789 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4720 robust_rms=0.640 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.013 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.013 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4720 robust_rms=0.441 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.695 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.695 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4720 robust_rms_before=1.095 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.481 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.441 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.717 worst_region_rms_after=0.695 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.428 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.695
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.717 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.717 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.481 arcsec matched=4720
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits N_match=4720 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.510 n_q1=829 n_q2=1166 n_q3=824 n_q4=1901 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OafjEBvTWC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2337, bad_region=18, passed=46220
Got 46220 stars (including 43830 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46220 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013103 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010482 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4731 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4731 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4802 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4728 stars left (next iteration limit 5204)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4728 robust_rms=9.464 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.446 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.446 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4728 robust_rms=0.644 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.992 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.992 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4728 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.644 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.644 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4728 robust_rms_before=0.426 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.469 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.427 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.649 worst_region_rms_after=0.644 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.649 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.644
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.649 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.649 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.426 arcsec matched=4728
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits N_match=4728 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.511 n_q1=903 n_q2=1142 n_q3=870 n_q4=1813 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-09-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_021209_TTUQ1b1x1_1064939_MkZgUaIs/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:14:58.06 +08:54:27.8: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:14:51.82 +07:31:18.6: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:12:45.70 +01:06:55.3: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:16:58.60 +06:57:20.3: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:13:19.81 +09:45:21.5: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:28:15.10 +03:55:37.6: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:08:11.98 +04:02:31.9: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:13:21.84 +10:15:08.8: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:13:19.81 +09:45:21.5: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:14:51.82 +07:31:18.6: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:16:58.60 +06:57:20.3: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:28:15.10 +03:55:37.6: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:12:45.70 +01:06:55.3: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:14:58.06 +08:54:27.8: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:19.81 +09:45:21.5: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4278 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:51.82 +07:31:18.6: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8460 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:16:58.60 +06:57:20.3: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5017 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:08:11.98 +04:02:31.9: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:45.70 +01:06:55.3: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3564 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:15.10 +03:55:37.6: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3994 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:58.06 +08:54:27.8: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8492 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:11.98 +04:02:31.9: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6772 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:15:21.03 +06:07:29.8: 10.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:13:21.84 +10:15:08.8: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:21.84 +10:15:08.8: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7756 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:15:21.03 +06:07:29.8: 10.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.86 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:15:21.03 +06:07:29.8: ref_mag=10.86 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6521 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:54:54.14 +01:26:13.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:20:46.53 +00:49:00.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:24:15.29 +03:43:38.1: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:54:54.14 +01:26:13.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:20:46.53 +00:49:00.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:46.53 +00:49:00.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:12:53.94 +05:59:59.2: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:24:15.29 +03:43:38.1: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:15.29 +03:43:38.1: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2387 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:12:53.94 +05:59:59.2: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:53.94 +05:59:59.2: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4809 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:14:35.39 +04:32:05.1: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:14:35.39 +04:32:05.1: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:35.39 +04:32:05.1: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7825 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:10:43.34 +03:24:20.0: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:53:11.38 +02:10:41.3: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:10:43.34 +03:24:20.0: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:10:43.34 +03:24:20.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9383 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:53:11.38 +02:10:41.3: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:11.38 +02:10:41.3: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4142 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:06:38.45 +01:55:42.5: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:06:38.45 +01:55:42.5: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:06:38.45 +01:55:42.5: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2813 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:03:20.28 +04:16:59.2: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:22:19.78 +07:01:01.2: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:03:20.28 +04:16:59.2: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:03:20.28 +04:16:59.2: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7496 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:22:19.78 +07:01:01.2: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:22:19.78 +07:01:01.2: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.7798 delta=1.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:17:05.50 +05:28:09.8: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:15:03.74 +04:44:14.7: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:17:05.50 +05:28:09.8: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:17:05.50 +05:28:09.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5130 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:15:03.74 +04:44:14.7: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:15:03.74 +04:44:14.7: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9404 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:11:57.09 +08:01:32.6: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:11:57.09 +08:01:32.6: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:11:57.09 +08:01:32.6: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8570 delta=1.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:14:25.86 +06:35:01.2: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:14:25.86 +06:35:01.2: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:25.86 +06:35:01.2: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9246 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:56:45.77 +04:51:26.4: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:56:45.77 +04:51:26.4: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:56:45.77 +04:51:26.4: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9647 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:53:52.23 +02:18:35.6: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:53:52.23 +02:18:35.6: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:53:52.23 +02:18:35.6: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9927 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:12:25.31 +07:10:44.7: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:55:43.97 +01:56:30.3: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:12:25.31 +07:10:44.7: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:12:25.31 +07:10:44.7: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7976 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:55:43.97 +01:56:30.3: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:55:43.97 +01:56:30.3: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8256 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102993.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14035.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14832.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190792.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19316.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30838.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out42603.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47564.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50354.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58749.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83835.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87250.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190110_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190110_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190111_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190111_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190112_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190112_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:21.94 +08:38:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190116_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190116_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190117_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190117_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:09.52 +01:39:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190118_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190118_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190119_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190119_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190121_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190121_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190124_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190124_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190126_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190126_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:48.77 +10:13:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190127_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190127_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:12.86 +09:54:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190129_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190129_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:00.93 +10:43:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190130_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190130_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190131_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190131_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190145_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190145_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:31.15 +09:13:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190219_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190219_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.42 +08:11:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190401_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190401_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190456_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190456_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:53.59 +04:36:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190683_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190683_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:04.96 +05:56:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190740_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190740_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:22.15 +02:02:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190785_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190785_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:23.10 +02:02:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190792_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 190792_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190815_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190815_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:05.96 +05:55:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190829_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190829_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:48.07 +08:29:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190844_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190844_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190856_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190856_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:15.13 +08:25:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190865_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190865_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.21 +06:30:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190875_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190875_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:10.30 +05:07:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190918_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190918_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:14.18 +10:19:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190934_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190934_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:34.23 +01:11:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190955_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190955_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:44.70 +03:35:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190976_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190976_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:12.99 +03:46:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190986_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190986_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190998_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 190998_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:08.81 +05:58:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191013_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 191013_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:22.17 +06:35:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191042_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 191042_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:05.01 +07:33:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191054_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 191054_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:30.38 +09:36:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191065_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 191065_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:16.56 +10:33:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191071_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 191071_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:50.63 +08:58:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191080_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 191080_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:19.74 +08:11:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191111_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 191111_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:31.91 +01:46:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191129_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 191129_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:34.10 +06:04:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191131_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 191131_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:10.19 +09:11:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191154_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 191154_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:08.59 +04:04:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191198_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 191198_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191222_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 191222_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:27.20 +09:45:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191267_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 191267_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:49.92 +05:25:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30838_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 30838_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16681_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 16681_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:41.17 +02:04:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111548_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 111548_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:45.93 +08:27:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13564_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 13564_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:57.69 +01:49:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73865_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 73865_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:10.20 +06:25:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17708_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 17708_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34551_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 34551_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:00.56 +03:44:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20343_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 20343_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:07.18 +02:22:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56849_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 56849_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:33.14 +05:22:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135524_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 135524_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:56.22 +09:18:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31904_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 31904_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:35.69 +03:31:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122336_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 122336_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20895_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 20895_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:58.32 +02:34:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14035_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 14035_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23194_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 23194_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:09.31 +02:40:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131416_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 131416_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:37.31 +09:37:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23680_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 23680_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:01.02 +02:42:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91696_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 91696_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:59.35 +07:25:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18414_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 18414_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:59.35 +02:20:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25548_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 25548_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:15.85 +02:56:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157497_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 157497_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:52.62 +10:23:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81483_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 81483_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:07.43 +06:48:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15451_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 15451_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:24.77 +02:05:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58196_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 58196_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:58.56 +05:22:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42603_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 42603_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83835_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 83835_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129238_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 129238_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:43.59 +09:35:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64338_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 64338_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:40.94 +05:44:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108481_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 108481_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:52.11 +08:15:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18734_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 18734_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:13.70 +02:18:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18992_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 18992_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:45.39 +02:20:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58749_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 58749_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89762_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 89762_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:20.11 +07:14:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54354_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 54354_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:35.89 +05:13:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14036_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 14036_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.90 +01:52:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47564_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 47564_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46740_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 46740_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:06.72 +04:35:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31538_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 31538_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:03.67 +03:26:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102993_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 102993_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22762_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 22762_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:36.80 +02:36:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20875_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 20875_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:07.38 +02:34:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23768_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 23768_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:28.33 +02:46:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76248_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 76248_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50354_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 50354_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51689_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 51689_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:11.88 +05:00:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80695_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 80695_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:37.19 +06:48:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19316_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 19316_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30715_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 30715_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:41.54 +03:20:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03659_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 03659_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:22.84 +01:03:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87250_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 87250_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14832_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
Preparing report for the candidate 14832_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07744_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 07744_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:47.80 +01:16:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33592_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 33592_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:44.95 +03:45:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76320_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 76320_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:59.84 +06:29:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18787_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 18787_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:27.39 +02:18:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73780_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 73780_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:03.50 +06:19:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05061_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 05061_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:45.18 +01:13:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07628_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 07628_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:33.15 +01:27:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56015_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 56015_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:50.49 +05:14:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73989_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080
The candidate 73989_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-10-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0080 did not pass the final checks
