This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2920 2461317.7920 12.29 05:02:54.76 +26:01:39.5
177.10277 -9.47476 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -0 -0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:02:54.76 +26:01:39.5: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:02:54.76 +26:01:39.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 04.2920* 05 02 54.76 +26 01 39.5 12.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461317.7920,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261004.2920 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2920 2461317.7920 13.36 04:39:09.70 +28:48:15.5
171.55650 -11.87832 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana 0 -0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:39:09.70 +28:48:15.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:39:09.70 +28:48:15.5: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 04.2920* 04 39 09.70 +28 48 15.5 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461317.7920,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261004.2920 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2920 2461317.7920 13.47 04:32:42.70 +25:38:05.4
173.07436 -15.02828 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia 0 -1 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:32:42.70 +25:38:05.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:32:42.70 +25:38:05.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 04.2920* 04 32 42.70 +25 38 05.4 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461317.7920,13.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261004.2920 13.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2920 2461317.7920 14.04 04:43:56.22 +34:20:40.7
167.94146 -7.51517 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.573 Recha -0 -0 0 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:43:56.22 +34:20:40.7: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:43:56.22 +34:20:40.7: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461317.7920,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261004.2920 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 04.2920 2461317.7920 13.83 05:11:17.79 +29:45:33.0
175.17067 -5.77508 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.359 Georgia 1 -1 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:11:17.79 +29:45:33.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:11:17.79 +29:45:33.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461317.7920,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261004.2920 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461317.79232796 04.10.2026 07:00:47.136 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15421
Objects passed selection criteria: 15397
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13959.8
Average stars matched: 13617 (97.5447 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Oct 3 04:56:41 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-231-g50972ca5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 4 02:04:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461317.79232796 04.10.2026 07:00:47.136 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 104
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 46 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 117683
Objects passed selection criteria: 117482
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 99035
Average stars matched: 95521 (96.4518 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 512960 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Oct 3 04:56:41 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-231-g50972ca5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 4 02:06:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461317.79170385
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:08.990 +29:59:15.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:08.990 +29:59:15.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0295 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:06.298 +29:58:35.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:06.298 +29:58:35.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0260 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:08.990 +29:59:15.52
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:06.298 +29:58:35.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01470 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B4RzxisFCa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XxFmIvSkOv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QVX6QNkVDn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hqehDPUoIh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh has not found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
3.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.B4RzxisFCa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XxFmIvSkOv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QVX6QNkVDn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=622, bad_region=0, passed=11920
Got 11920 stars (including 11286 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11920 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5262)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=12.361 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.295 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.295 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.849 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.849 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.340 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.601 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.601 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4783 robust_rms_before=0.962 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.395 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.340 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.702 worst_region_rms_after=0.601 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.128 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.601
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:09.008 +29:59:14.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11920 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky31302.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.962 -> 0.340 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4783 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4549 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4549 pairs (4783 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4549 robust_rms=12.137 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.264 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.264 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4549 robust_rms=0.455 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.805 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.805 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4549 robust_rms=0.334 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.595 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.595 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4549 robust_rms_before=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.334 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.591 worst_region_rms_after=0.595 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.591 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.595
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.595 vs 0.591 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4549 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4549 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits N_match=4549 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=665 n_q2=928 n_q3=973 n_q4=1983 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hqehDPUoIh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=578, bad_region=0, passed=11665
Got 11665 stars (including 11071 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11665 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11665 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11665 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11665 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4787 stars left (next iteration limit 5265)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=12.244 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.057 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.057 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.451 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.828 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.828 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.333 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.572 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.572 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4787 robust_rms_before=0.959 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.417 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.333 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.738 worst_region_rms_after=0.572 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.165 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.572
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:06.308 +29:58:34.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11665 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky31328.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.959 -> 0.333 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4787 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4556 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4556 pairs (4787 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4556 robust_rms=12.116 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.678 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.678 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4556 robust_rms=0.448 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.795 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.795 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4556 robust_rms=0.328 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.561 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.561 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4556 robust_rms_before=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.328 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.563 worst_region_rms_after=0.561 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.563 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.561
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:06.308 +29:58:34.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11665 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky31519.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.328 -> 0.328 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4556 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11665 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4556 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits N_match=4556 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=663 n_q2=932 n_q3=964 n_q4=1997 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.263
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.197
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (4549 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070_astrometric_residuals.png (4556 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:02:54.76 +26:01:39.5: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:02:54.76 +26:01:39.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21316.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21121_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 21121_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:10.17 +31:23:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21192_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 21192_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.25 +32:10:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21195_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 21195_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.21 +31:27:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21214_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 21214_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.45 +28:42:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21240_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 21240_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.76 +34:09:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21242_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 21242_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:27.85 +34:07:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21243_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 21243_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.44 +34:26:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21292_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 21292_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:53.70 +27:26:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21299_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 21299_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:55.34 +27:35:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21316_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
Preparing report for the candidate 21316_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21320_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 21320_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:36.86 +33:40:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 21321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:11.48 +29:15:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.61 +30:42:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.38 +35:03:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.37 +26:08:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.35 +34:08:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:02:54.76 +26:01:39.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:09.008 +29:59:14.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:09.008 +29:59:14.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0296 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:06.308 +29:58:34.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:06.308 +29:58:34.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0262 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:09.008 +29:59:14.67
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:06.308 +29:58:34.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01472 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hHvrzhvIw1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MgYYQxzHJf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iuDIqMEEt5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wUOlGD2IRb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6881 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 101 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hHvrzhvIw1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1871 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MgYYQxzHJf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.iuDIqMEEt5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=4820, bad_region=43, passed=71021
Got 71021 stars (including 66076 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71021 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5262)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=12.583 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.095 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.095 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.857 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.857 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.342 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.595 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.595 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4784 robust_rms_before=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.399 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.342 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.593 worst_region_rms_after=0.595 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.593 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.595
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.593 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.593 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.339 arcsec matched=4784
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits N_match=4784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=710 n_q2=986 n_q3=1046 n_q4=2042 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.433
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wUOlGD2IRb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4680, bad_region=45, passed=69951
Got 69951 stars (including 65159 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69951 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4790 stars left (next iteration limit 5269)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=12.427 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.368 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.368 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.813 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.813 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.337 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.569 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.569 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4790 robust_rms_before=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.408 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.337 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.566 worst_region_rms_after=0.569 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.566 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.569
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.566 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.566 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.334 arcsec matched=4790
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits N_match=4790 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=719 n_q2=1008 n_q3=1031 n_q4=2032 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.403
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_01-59-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_020209_TTUQ1b1x1_4109907_O8ahPWmk/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:10:43.53 +24:43:12.4: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:57:19.03 +30:57:33.6: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:22:27.60 +27:04:07.8: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:24:54.42 +33:16:49.3: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:32:44.95 +33:29:55.1: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:12:41.23 +32:10:54.4: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:16:26.39 +25:55:21.8: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:22:27.60 +27:04:07.8: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:16:26.39 +25:55:21.8: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:57:19.03 +30:57:33.6: 14.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:10:43.53 +24:43:12.4: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:32:44.95 +33:29:55.1: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:12:41.23 +32:10:54.4: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:27.60 +27:04:07.8: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3742 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:24:54.42 +33:16:49.3: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:26.39 +25:55:21.8: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6824 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:19.03 +30:57:33.6: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2551 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:43.53 +24:43:12.4: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7743 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:44.95 +33:29:55.1: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9223 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:41.23 +32:10:54.4: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1556 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:54.42 +33:16:49.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7204 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:39:09.70 +28:48:15.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:32:42.70 +25:38:05.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:50.13 +29:58:34.5: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:39:09.70 +28:48:15.5: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:32:42.70 +25:38:05.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:29:35.84 +34:16:16.5: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:50.13 +29:58:34.5: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:50.13 +29:58:34.5: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3826 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:29:35.84 +34:16:16.5: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:35.84 +34:16:16.5: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4167 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:28:41.31 +33:56:26.2: 13.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:43:56.22 +34:20:40.7: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:26:33.97 +29:16:13.4: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:28:41.31 +33:56:26.2: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:41.31 +33:56:26.2: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7359 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:11:17.79 +29:45:33.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:26:33.97 +29:16:13.4: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:33.97 +29:16:13.4: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1010 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:43:56.22 +34:20:40.7: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:11:17.79 +29:45:33.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:50:44.03 +34:50:42.5: 15.38 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:26:15.01 +30:20:51.0: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:50:44.03 +34:50:42.5: 15.29 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:50:44.03 +34:50:42.5: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2351 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:28:05.05 +33:52:18.2: 14.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:28:04.01 +33:24:43.9: 14.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:26:15.01 +30:20:51.0: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:15.01 +30:20:51.0: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1449 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:28:05.05 +33:52:18.2: 15.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:05.05 +33:52:18.2: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7495 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:28:04.01 +33:24:43.9: 14.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:04.01 +33:24:43.9: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6444 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:13:59.57 +30:06:57.2: 14.79 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:13:59.57 +30:06:57.2: 14.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:13:59.57 +30:06:57.2: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6446 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:26:28.86 +33:55:20.5: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:26:28.86 +33:55:20.5: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:28.86 +33:55:20.5: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2022 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out152199.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out141055.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151667.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151718.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152018.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152048.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151115_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151115_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151128_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151128_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:52.79 +32:55:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151131_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151131_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151137_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151137_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151138_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151138_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151141_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151141_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:00.77 +29:52:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151146_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151146_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151151_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151151_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:36.90 +33:23:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151155_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151155_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151156_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151156_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:30.14 +30:16:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151157_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151157_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:04.47 +29:46:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151235_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151235_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.21 +31:27:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151269_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151269_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.19 +34:07:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151272_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151272_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.86 +34:09:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151284_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151284_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.48 +34:26:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151286_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151286_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.84 +33:05:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151308_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151308_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:14.22 +28:37:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151324_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151324_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:18.12 +33:47:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151369_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151369_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:54.66 +26:01:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151392_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151392_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.91 +33:06:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.71 +34:23:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151438_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151438_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:25.05 +30:30:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151464_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151464_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.99 +28:31:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151492_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151492_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.56 +34:06:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151494_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151494_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.54 +32:33:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.18 +32:26:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151509_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151509_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.99 +26:25:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151530_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151530_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.54 +33:11:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151555_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151555_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.70 +26:10:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151570_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151570_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.25 +34:24:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151577_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151577_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.89 +29:47:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151578_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151578_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.56 +33:12:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151655_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151655_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:36.56 +30:33:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151657_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151657_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:45.74 +30:29:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151667_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
Preparing report for the candidate 151667_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151692_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151692_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.67 +29:45:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151710_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151710_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.89 +33:11:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151718_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
Preparing report for the candidate 151718_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151728_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151728_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.33 +31:44:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151739_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151739_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:49.28 +33:17:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151745_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151745_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151746_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151746_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:27.07 +34:24:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151779_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151779_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:27.47 +34:00:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:35.83 +31:24:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151798_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151798_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:18.29 +33:59:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151799_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151799_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:09.18 +33:24:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151801_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151801_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151805_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151805_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:28.03 +34:24:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151816_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151816_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:37.89 +33:31:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151828_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151828_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:23.84 +33:30:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151859_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151859_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:42.96 +34:09:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151880_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151880_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:29.03 +29:39:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151902_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151902_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:21.10 +33:12:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151909_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151909_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.79 +30:48:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151912_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151912_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.76 +30:49:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151929_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151929_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:30.76 +34:10:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151934_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151934_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:22.21 +29:33:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151974_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151974_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151991_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 151991_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.21 +31:04:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152012_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152012_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:59.92 +32:25:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152018_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
Preparing report for the candidate 152018_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152026_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152026_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:55.62 +27:36:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152035_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152035_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:52.76 +31:14:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152041_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152041_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152048_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
Preparing report for the candidate 152048_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152051_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152051_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.84 +31:25:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152064_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152064_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:41.70 +28:20:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152095_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152095_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:47.67 +30:15:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152147_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152147_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:01.25 +34:10:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152169_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152169_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:05.09 +30:58:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152194_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152194_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:29.53 +31:30:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152199_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152199_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:44.03 +34:50:42.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.327 162065784848841984 072.68307857843 +34.84533552540 12.9480 11.4527 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.327#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152215_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152215_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:48.84 +30:10:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152233_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152233_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152291_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152291_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:06.71 +29:08:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152365_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152365_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152417_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 152417_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:13.61 +30:07:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.25 +32:10:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150715_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 150715_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.55 +31:18:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.45 +26:45:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 141164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:25.93 +29:15:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141055_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 141055_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:59.57 +30:06:57.2 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.63)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:52.93 +30:33:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140162_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 140162_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:12.43 +34:32:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.27 +25:24:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:38.51 +28:39:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.46 +28:42:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:11.32 +33:50:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:53.67 +27:26:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.31 +25:58:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.38 +35:03:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14454_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 14454_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.37 +26:08:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87999_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 87999_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:20.38 +29:14:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:08.24 +27:03:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 66229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:56.02 +30:38:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.35 +34:08:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070
The candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-04_02-00-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070 did not pass the final checks
