This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.4841 2461314.9841 10.99 08:12:30.68 -30:09:02.2
248.66576 2.15293 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V0537 Pup
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.300 V 13.000 V 2452069.70000 81.000000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:12:30.68 -30:09:02.2: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:12:30.68 -30:09:02.2: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0537 Pup,2461314.9841,10.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0537 Pup 20261001.4841 10.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.4841 2461314.9841 11.91 08:35:58.87 -24:31:43.9
246.99555 9.63418 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J083559-2431.7
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.660 V Y 0.710 V 2451990.50000 83.300000000000 S
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:35:58.87 -24:31:43.9: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:35:58.87 -24:31:43.9: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J083559-2431.7,2461314.9841,11.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J083559-2431.7 20261001.4841 11.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.4841 2461314.9841 12.69 08:07:35.33 -29:32:20.5
247.57082 1.59099 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" GDS_J0807352-293220
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.780 r Y 0.470 r M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:07:35.33 -29:32:20.5: 13.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:07:35.33 -29:32:20.5: 13.77 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0807352-293220,2461314.9841,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0807352-293220 20261001.4841 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.4841 2461314.9841 12.41 08:27:05.22 -30:06:44.0
250.41313 4.77804 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J082705.13-300644.7
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.450 V 14.960 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:27:05.22 -30:06:44.0: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:27:05.22 -30:06:44.0: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J082705.13-300644.7,2461314.9841,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J082705.13-300644.7 20261001.4841 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.4841 2461314.9841 13.15 08:54:12.97 -22:18:39.7
247.74658 14.31110 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J085412.94-221839.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.080 g Y 0.540 g 2458151.36900 38.400000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:54:12.97 -22:18:39.7: 14.16 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:54:12.97 -22:18:39.7: 14.22 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J085412.94-221839.1,2461314.9841,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J085412.94-221839.1 20261001.4841 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.4841 2461314.9841 12.41 08:49:16.79 -28:53:54.1
252.34500 9.37259 galactic Pyx Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSV 4266
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.900 V < 14.600 V 2454617.00000 342.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:49:16.79 -28:53:54.1: 14.24 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:49:16.79 -28:53:54.1: 14.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 4266,2461314.9841,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 4266 20261001.4841 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.77650925 12.02.2026 06:38:00.399 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
First image: 2461083.77650925 12.02.2026 06:38:00.399 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Last image: 2461314.98444132 01.10.2026 11:37:25.730 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19582
Objects passed selection criteria: 19514
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15655
Average stars matched: 15178.5 (96.9562 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249008 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 1 06:40:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.77650925 12.02.2026 06:38:00.399 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
First image: 2461083.77650925 12.02.2026 06:38:00.399 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Last image: 2461314.98444132 01.10.2026 11:37:25.730 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 106
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 42 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 160439
Objects passed selection criteria: 160072
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 124445
Average stars matched: 119614 (96.1182 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 556832 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 1 06:41:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461314.98369821
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:38:24.548 -26:00:00.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Image size: 943.6'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:38:24.180 -25:59:59.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:38:24.548 -26:00:00.56
Second-epoch image center 08:38:24.180 -25:59:59.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0014 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Image size: 943.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:38:22.904 -25:59:21.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:38:24.548 -26:00:00.56
Second-epoch image center 08:38:22.904 -25:59:21.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0124 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:38:24.180 -25:59:59.58
Second-epoch second image center 08:38:22.904 -25:59:21.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01149 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L6OYjlnyCn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iZd2pQ7d8O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Aa40c5IYfJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JQPbpfnb4D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 20684 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 120.6657 to 138.8815 deg, Dec -31.3521 to -20.3049 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 120.6657 to 138.8815 deg, Dec -31.3521 to -20.3049 deg
Loaded 21147 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13472 out of 14354 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14354 out of 20684 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.804600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.804600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 20684 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 120.6657 to 138.8815 deg, Dec -31.3521 to -20.3049 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 120.6657 to 138.8815 deg, Dec -31.3521 to -20.3049 deg
Loaded 21147 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13472 out of 14354 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14354 out of 20684 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 20595 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 120.6658 to 138.8575 deg, Dec -31.3444 to -20.3050 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 120.6658 to 138.8575 deg, Dec -31.3444 to -20.3050 deg
Loaded 21116 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13488 out of 14369 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14369 out of 20595 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
2.3 pix Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
3.2 pix fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
3.2 pix fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
14.9 mag. Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.L6OYjlnyCn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1778, bad_region=0, passed=20684
Got 20684 stars (including 18878 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20684 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4861 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4861 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=707 n_q2=1431 n_q3=1000 n_q4=1723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.iZd2pQ7d8O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits' -> 'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1792, bad_region=0, passed=20595
Got 20595 stars (including 18776 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20595 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5351)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=710 n_q2=1444 n_q3=978 n_q4=1732 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits -region wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Aa40c5IYfJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, bad_region=0, passed=10849
Got 10849 stars (including 10282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10849 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4853 robust_rms=7.819 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.432 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.203 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4853 robust_rms=0.717 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.528 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.826 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4853 robust_rms=0.600 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.897 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.730 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4853 robust_rms_before=1.658 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.569 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.600 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.852 worst_region_rms_after=0.897 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.976 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.730
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.852 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.852 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.569 arcsec matched=4853
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.643 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.747 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.544 n_q1=1783 n_q2=784 n_q3=1561 n_q4=725 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.363
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits -region wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JQPbpfnb4D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=574, bad_region=0, passed=10849
Got 10849 stars (including 10268 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10849 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013104 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010483 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4854 robust_rms=8.163 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.697 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.446 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4854 robust_rms=0.706 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.135 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.900 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4854 robust_rms=0.572 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.854 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.747 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4854 robust_rms_before=1.575 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.557 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.572 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.874 worst_region_rms_after=0.854 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.942 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.747
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.874 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.874 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.557 arcsec matched=4854
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.731 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.525 n_q1=1771 n_q2=802 n_q3=1559 n_q4=722 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits -region wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.390 worst_q_ratio=1.122
ref2=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.098
new1=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits sigma_overall=0.548 worst_q_ratio=1.363
new2=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits sigma_overall=0.540 worst_q_ratio=1.354
reference average sigma_overall=0.3945 worst_q_ratio=1.11
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4861 matched stars from wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_astrometric_residuals.png (4864 matched stars from wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324_astrometric_residuals.png (4853 matched stars from wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325_astrometric_residuals.png (4854 matched stars from wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Pyx-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:12:30.68 -30:09:02.2: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:12:30.68 -30:09:02.2: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:12:30.68 -30:09:02.2: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9889 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18908.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31379_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 31379_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:28:21.61 -21:28:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31510_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 31510_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:15:30.35 -24:59:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31613_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 31613_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:40.41 -28:36:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31620_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 31620_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:37:35.58 -25:44:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31718_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 31718_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:00.23 -23:54:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31730_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 31730_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:27:13.22 -26:15:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31745_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 31745_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:19.45 -29:56:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31748_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 31748_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:52:54.30 -29:33:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30586_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 30586_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:46:05.62 -27:45:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18908_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 18908_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08341_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 08341_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:49.92 -25:36:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05659_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 05659_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:03:53.14 -23:49:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Pyx-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
08:12:30.68 -30:09:02.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:38:24.548 -26:00:00.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Image size: 943.6'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:38:24.180 -25:59:59.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:38:24.548 -26:00:00.56
Second-epoch image center 08:38:24.180 -25:59:59.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0014 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Image size: 943.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:38:22.904 -25:59:21.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:38:24.548 -26:00:00.56
Second-epoch image center 08:38:22.904 -25:59:21.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0124 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:38:24.180 -25:59:59.58
Second-epoch second image center 08:38:22.904 -25:59:21.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01149 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BSmx5Jtpbx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ealK3bs7za
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cu0RqfGX2C
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kgjuIs1uuX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 173073 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 120.6579 to 138.9421 deg, Dec -31.3553 to -20.2730 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 120.6579 to 138.9421 deg, Dec -31.3553 to -20.2730 deg
Loaded 21262 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13504 out of 17520 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17520 out of 173073 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.669450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.669450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 173073 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 120.6579 to 138.9421 deg, Dec -31.3553 to -20.2730 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 120.6579 to 138.9421 deg, Dec -31.3553 to -20.2730 deg
Loaded 21262 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13504 out of 17520 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17520 out of 173073 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 173827 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 120.6583 to 138.9424 deg, Dec -31.3481 to -20.2554 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 120.6583 to 138.9424 deg, Dec -31.3481 to -20.2554 deg
Loaded 21271 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13462 out of 17502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17502 out of 173827 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 103 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
2.1 pix Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
3.0 pix fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
3.0 pix fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
15.1 mag. Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BSmx5Jtpbx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=57, blended=19220, bad_region=0, passed=173016
Got 173016 stars (including 153511 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173016 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=776 n_q2=1357 n_q3=1075 n_q4=1667 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ealK3bs7za (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits' -> 'wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=19271, bad_region=3, passed=173782
Got 173782 stars (including 154242 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173782 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=780 n_q2=1363 n_q3=1062 n_q4=1671 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.080
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits -region wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cu0RqfGX2C (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=5010, bad_region=9, passed=76885
Got 76885 stars (including 71752 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76885 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4859 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=7.960 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.900 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.142 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=0.708 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.535 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.826 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=0.589 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.903 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.716 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4859 robust_rms_before=1.657 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.551 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.589 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.867 worst_region_rms_after=0.903 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.003 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.716
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.867 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.867 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.551 arcsec matched=4859
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits N_match=4859 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.622 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.754 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.518 n_q1=1752 n_q2=775 n_q3=1581 n_q4=751 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.401
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits -region wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kgjuIs1uuX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=5153, bad_region=7, passed=76984
Got 76984 stars (including 71729 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76984 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013104 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010483 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4861 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=8.171 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.770 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.064 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=0.712 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.117 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.892 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=0.575 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.856 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.728 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4861 robust_rms_before=1.577 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.551 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.575 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.856 worst_region_rms_after=0.856 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.908 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.728
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.856 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.856 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.551 arcsec matched=4861
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits N_match=4861 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.726 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.503 n_q1=1742 n_q2=787 n_q3=1583 n_q4=749 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.355
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits -region wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-36-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_063845_TTUQ1b1x1_1858878_Qp5yVaQc/wcs_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Pyx-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:17:47.01 -27:36:44.5: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:36:36.97 -25:04:59.4: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:16:15.33 -26:43:39.9: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:14:10.49 -25:10:06.1: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:07:37.19 -26:40:05.0: 13.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:40:23.90 -28:56:22.4: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:08:12.99 -24:08:31.4: 12.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:40:23.90 -28:56:22.4: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:07:37.19 -26:40:05.0: 13.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:16:15.33 -26:43:39.9: 13.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:36:36.97 -25:04:59.4: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:17:47.01 -27:36:44.5: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:14:10.49 -25:10:06.1: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:40:23.90 -28:56:22.4: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4926 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:36:36.97 -25:04:59.4: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9256 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:07:37.19 -26:40:05.0: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3834 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:17:47.01 -27:36:44.5: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9189 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:16:15.33 -26:43:39.9: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0513 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:14:10.49 -25:10:06.1: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1584 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:08:12.99 -24:08:31.4: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:08:12.99 -24:08:31.4: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9575 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:04:24.63 -26:03:40.5: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:19:11.85 -29:26:52.7: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:04:24.63 -26:03:40.5: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:04:24.63 -26:03:40.5: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6738 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:19:11.85 -29:26:52.7: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:19:11.85 -29:26:52.7: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4657 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:12:13.37 -29:51:09.9: 11.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:08:22.23 -23:36:17.6: 11.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 09:12:13.37 -29:51:09.9: 11.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:12:13.37 -29:51:09.9: ref_mag=11.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1123 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:05:38.98 -29:58:36.8: 12.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:08:22.23 -23:36:17.6: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:08:22.23 -23:36:17.6: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7987 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:31:43.21 -23:31:42.0: 12.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:05:38.98 -29:58:36.8: 12.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:05:38.98 -29:58:36.8: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3632 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:06:29.44 -25:06:13.0: 12.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:12:57.18 -24:10:43.8: 13.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:31:43.21 -23:31:42.0: 12.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:31:43.21 -23:31:42.0: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8286 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:26:18.80 -29:35:55.9: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:06:29.44 -25:06:13.0: 12.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:06:29.44 -25:06:13.0: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0102 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:12:57.18 -24:10:43.8: 13.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:12:57.18 -24:10:43.8: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0922 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:26:18.80 -29:35:55.9: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:35:58.87 -24:31:43.9: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:35:58.87 -24:31:43.9: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:35:58.87 -24:31:43.9: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9080 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:07:35.33 -29:32:20.5: 13.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:07:35.33 -29:32:20.5: 13.77 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:07:35.33 -29:32:20.5: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.6891 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:27:05.22 -30:06:44.0: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:54:12.97 -22:18:39.7: 14.16 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:27:05.22 -30:06:44.0: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 08:49:16.79 -28:53:54.1: 14.24 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:27:05.22 -30:06:44.0: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4107 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:54:12.97 -22:18:39.7: 14.22 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:54:12.97 -22:18:39.7: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.1470 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-38-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits at 08:49:16.79 -28:53:54.1: 14.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:49:16.79 -28:53:54.1: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.4109 delta=1.87 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out201103.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out128818.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out137407.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out170302.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24562.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56562.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198692_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198692_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:23:22.43 -23:01:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198700_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198700_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198704_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198704_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198709_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198709_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:42.05 -25:27:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198711_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198711_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198716_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198716_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198717_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198717_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:10:50.21 -30:08:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198721_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198721_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:33.36 -31:03:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198722_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198722_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198723_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198723_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198725_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198725_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198726_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198726_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:38.54 -27:21:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198727_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198727_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:18:36.95 -23:33:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198728_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198728_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:34.77 -24:05:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198729_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198729_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:27.11 -22:53:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198732_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198732_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:27.14 -25:13:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198735_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198735_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:00.56 -25:40:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198737_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198737_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198738_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198738_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:11:28.43 -29:33:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198739_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198739_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198741_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198741_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:26.37 -25:33:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198744_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198744_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:40.71 -28:56:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198745_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198745_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:45.44 -26:45:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198747_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198747_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:10:38.32 -30:12:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198748_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198748_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:18:07.76 -25:38:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198749_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198749_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:17.57 -21:56:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198750_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198750_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:21:28.17 -30:18:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198752_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198752_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:18.65 -26:42:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198753_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198753_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:44.37 -21:12:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198754_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198754_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:38.65 -26:27:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198755_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198755_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198756_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198756_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:04.50 -23:59:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198757_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198757_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198759_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198759_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:28.23 -22:03:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198760_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198760_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:39.15 -25:05:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198761_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198761_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:48.71 -24:49:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198776_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 198776_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:06.73 -24:02:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199366_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 199366_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199382_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 199382_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:15:27.78 -26:09:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199425_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 199425_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:51.04 -27:30:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199574_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 199574_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:23.05 -28:15:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199839_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 199839_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:08.18 -22:14:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199953_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 199953_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:10.98 -24:23:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199955_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 199955_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:37:51.19 -26:17:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200073_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200073_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200155_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200155_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:10:39.56 -30:45:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200211_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200211_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:06.56 -24:05:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200295_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200295_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:03:30.48 -30:55:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200333_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200333_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:04.80 -24:04:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200498_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200498_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:22.37 -26:03:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200550_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200550_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200557_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200557_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:17.45 -20:53:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200572_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200572_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:27:30.55 -20:49:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200590_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200590_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:23.44 -26:23:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200626_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200626_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:41.51 -25:00:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200632_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200632_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:50:18.99 -28:52:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200658_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200658_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:23.30 -27:08:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200733_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200733_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:18:58.05 -29:43:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200741_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200741_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:39:53.00 -23:48:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200778_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200778_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:32.10 -25:40:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200811_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200811_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200930_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 200930_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:54.05 -21:36:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201016_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 201016_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201033_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 201033_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:04.40 -24:04:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201051_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 201051_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201099_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 201099_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:19.65 -20:53:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201103_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 201103_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:18.80 -29:35:55.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.206 5644725816058884608 126.57799471420 -29.59870112934 13.0661 11.1570 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.206#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201171_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 201171_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:06.58 -25:05:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201204_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 201204_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:27.91 -22:05:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201290_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 201290_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:02:46.59 -30:56:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201389_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 201389_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:27.63 -23:44:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201605_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 201605_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:39:53.38 -23:49:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201659_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 201659_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:48.98 -21:26:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201763_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 201763_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:00.55 -23:17:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159241_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 159241_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:45.24 -30:45:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77780_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 77780_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:37:35.57 -25:44:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125952_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 125952_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:59.03 -29:06:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149500_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 149500_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:18:03.99 -28:21:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56562_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 56562_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05908_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 05908_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:39:41.80 -21:08:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121290_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 121290_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:44:17.30 -28:06:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85878_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 85878_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:27:13.21 -26:15:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116437_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 116437_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:15.96 -27:56:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70211_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 70211_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:39.19 -25:18:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102029_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 102029_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:58:35.57 -26:48:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124901_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 124901_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:44.11 -29:48:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144680_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 144680_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:40.39 -28:36:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170691_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 170691_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:19.43 -29:56:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42733_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 42733_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:15:10.88 -23:45:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63175_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 63175_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:15:30.36 -24:59:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128818_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 128818_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46277_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 46277_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:00.24 -23:54:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115979_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 115979_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:46:05.62 -27:45:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168955_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 168955_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:30.77 -30:09:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125352_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 125352_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:52:54.30 -29:33:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66436_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 66436_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:09.56 -25:08:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170302_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 170302_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51595_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 51595_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:03:53.14 -23:49:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77334_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 77334_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:49.92 -25:36:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24562_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 24562_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137407_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 137407_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156436_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 156436_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:02:42.12 -30:32:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31249_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325
The candidate 31249_fd_Pyx-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-37-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0325 did not pass the final checks
