NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-08-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
Field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-08-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-08-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-08-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 546847 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 546847 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits_preview.png'
UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits

renamed 'UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits_preview.png'
UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 483.7856 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.3741 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2760.4990 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 712.6887 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2773.9317 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 714.1669 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 5.70604 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 13.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-01T06:30:16.6287853' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-01T11:30:16.6287853' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61314.4793591206 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-01T11:30:26.5319495' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61314.4794737385 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 190.586789818821 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 53.997076325621 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 16.3202777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 35.2866666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.51765073387285 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-08' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 42 21' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29492 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29492 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 89.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 895.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 13.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 100.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits :) Spent 0.509081 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 13.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-01T06:31:23.1282639' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-01T11:31:23.1282639' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61314.4801287963 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-01T11:31:33.0290158' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61314.4802433914 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 190.586789798186 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 53.997076407735 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 16.4563888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 35.3872222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.49006371628302 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-08' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 42 21' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29492 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29492 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 89.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 895.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 13.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 100.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits :) Spent 0.535436 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits


fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461314.97947486 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:42:23.713 +54:00:22.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits Image size: 944.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:42:21.941 +53:59:58.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:42:23.713 +54:00:22.25 Second-epoch image center 12:42:21.941 +53:59:58.14 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0080 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Image size: 944.0'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:42:24.669 +54:00:31.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:42:23.713 +54:00:22.25 Second-epoch image center 12:42:24.669 +54:00:31.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0035 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:42:21.941 +53:59:58.14 Second-epoch second image center 12:42:24.669 +54:00:31.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01149 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CrZQ9mx1o1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MLxCe4DwKL Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits &> /tmp/tmp.avkhCN5DaF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RK1yg4dX1U Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6366 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.2118 to 205.0249 deg, Dec +47.6307 to +59.4287 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.2118 to 205.0249 deg, Dec 47.6307 to 59.4287 deg Loaded 5134 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3351 out of 3529 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3529 out of 6366 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.896200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.896200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6366 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.2118 to 205.0249 deg, Dec +47.6307 to +59.4287 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.2118 to 205.0249 deg, Dec 47.6307 to 59.4287 deg Loaded 5134 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3351 out of 3529 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3529 out of 6366 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 6336 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.2116 to 205.0247 deg, Dec +47.6306 to +59.4305 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.2116 to 205.0247 deg, Dec 47.6306 to 59.4305 deg Loaded 5136 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3351 out of 3530 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3530 out of 6336 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 2.2 pix UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 3.2 pix fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits 3.2 pix fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 14.1 mag. fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits 14.1 mag. fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.CrZQ9mx1o1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=435, bad_region=0, passed=6366 Got 6366 stars (including 5928 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6366 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6366 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6366 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6366 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1177 n_q2=1184 n_q3=1269 n_q4=1260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.MLxCe4DwKL (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, bad_region=0, passed=6336 Got 6336 stars (including 5899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6336 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6336 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6336 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6336 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=1181 n_q2=1193 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.avkhCN5DaF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=196, bad_region=0, passed=3004 Got 3004 stars (including 2807 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3004 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013113 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010490 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2747 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2747 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3004 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2747 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3004 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3004 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 2747 stars left (next iteration limit 3021) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2747 robust_rms=11.710 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.537 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.537 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2747 robust_rms=0.636 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.942 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.864 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2747 robust_rms=0.470 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.598 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.566 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2747 robust_rms_before=1.554 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.392 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.470 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.502 worst_region_rms_after=0.598 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.096 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.566 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.502 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.502 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.392 arcsec matched=2747 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits N_match=2747 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.417 n_q1=713 n_q2=525 n_q3=819 n_q4=690 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.RK1yg4dX1U (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=171, bad_region=0, passed=2977 Got 2977 stars (including 2803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2977 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2748 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2748 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2748 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 2748 stars left (next iteration limit 3022) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2748 robust_rms=11.741 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.739 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.739 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2748 robust_rms=0.577 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.796 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.774 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2748 robust_rms=0.441 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.627 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.530 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2748 robust_rms_before=1.474 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.385 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.441 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.519 worst_region_rms_after=0.627 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.861 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.530 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.519 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.519 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.385 arcsec matched=2748 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits N_match=2748 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=712 n_q2=530 n_q3=819 n_q4=687 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.326 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.262 ref2=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.259 new1=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits sigma_overall=0.398 worst_q_ratio=1.287 new2=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits sigma_overall=0.390 worst_q_ratio=1.326 reference average sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.2605 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291_astrometric_residuals.png (4889 matched stars from wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320_astrometric_residuals.png (2747 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321_astrometric_residuals.png (2748 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20288_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 The candidate 20288_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.48024    2461314.98024    8.31    12:08:09.02 +55:27:52.1   1810 4074   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits **** FOUND 12:08:08.94 +55:27:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:42:23.713 +54:00:22.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits Image size: 944.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:42:21.941 +53:59:58.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:42:23.713 +54:00:22.25 Second-epoch image center 12:42:21.941 +53:59:58.14 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0080 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Image size: 944.0'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:42:24.669 +54:00:31.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:42:23.713 +54:00:22.25 Second-epoch image center 12:42:24.669 +54:00:31.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0035 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:42:21.941 +53:59:58.14 Second-epoch second image center 12:42:24.669 +54:00:31.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01149 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EoGcKgq5fR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XlBdkvjXfx Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vQOzohB0Me Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wRL9pmbwM5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 32060 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.0398 to 205.0249 deg, Dec +47.5901 to +59.4387 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.0398 to 205.0249 deg, Dec 47.5901 to 59.4387 deg Loaded 5176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3548 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3548 out of 32060 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.794300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.794300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 32060 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.0398 to 205.0249 deg, Dec +47.5901 to +59.4387 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.0398 to 205.0249 deg, Dec 47.5901 to 59.4387 deg Loaded 5176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3548 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3548 out of 32060 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 32020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.0401 to 205.0247 deg, Dec +47.5899 to +59.4401 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.0401 to 205.0247 deg, Dec 47.5899 to 59.4401 deg Loaded 5177 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3218 out of 3541 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3541 out of 32020 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 2.1 pix UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 3.0 pix fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits 3.0 pix fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.8 mag. UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 15.8 mag. UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.EoGcKgq5fR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1385, bad_region=8, passed=32036 Got 32036 stars (including 30583 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32036 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32036 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32036 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32036 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1160 n_q2=1172 n_q3=1278 n_q4=1274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.XlBdkvjXfx (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=1380, bad_region=9, passed=31995 Got 31995 stars (including 30547 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31995 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31995 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31995 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31995 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1172 n_q2=1171 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.vQOzohB0Me (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=394, bad_region=26, passed=14117 Got 14117 stars (including 13681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14117 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013113 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010490 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14117 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14117 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14117 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=11.497 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.379 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.379 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.687 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.969 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.923 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.523 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.680 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.606 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4860 robust_rms_before=1.555 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.449 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.523 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.599 worst_region_rms_after=0.680 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.062 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.606 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.599 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.599 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.449 arcsec matched=4860 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.454 n_q1=1273 n_q2=935 n_q3=1497 n_q4=1155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.wRL9pmbwM5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=523, bad_region=27, passed=14271 Got 14271 stars (including 13700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14271 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14271 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14271 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14271 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5348) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=11.339 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.158 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.158 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.622 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.840 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.796 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.691 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.563 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4864 robust_rms_before=1.479 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.436 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.497 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.579 worst_region_rms_after=0.691 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.826 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.563 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.579 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.579 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.436 arcsec matched=4864 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.459 n_q1=1277 n_q2=942 n_q3=1494 n_q4=1151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52355_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 The candidate 52355_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.48024    2461314.98024    11.61    12:15:42.39 +57:00:10.7   2491 4971   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits **** FOUND 12:15:42.36 +57:00:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52386_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 The candidate 52386_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.48024    2461314.98024    11.78    12:19:34.40 +49:00:00.3   2701 0124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits **** FOUND 12:19:34.42 +49:00:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52638_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 The candidate 52638_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.48024    2461314.98024    12.93    11:56:57.79 +49:29:53.1   0471 0541   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits **** FOUND 11:56:57.91 +49:29:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52731_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 The candidate 52731_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.48024    2461314.98024    13.05    11:56:55.86 +49:29:44.1   0467 0540   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits **** FOUND 11:56:55.78 +49:29:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52827_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 The candidate 52827_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.48024    2461314.98024    13.13    12:29:24.28 +56:19:09.6   3623 4543   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits **** FOUND 12:29:24.23 +56:19:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52829_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 The candidate 52829_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.48024    2461314.98024    13.24    12:11:45.82 +50:49:20.8   1980 1252   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits **** FOUND 12:11:45.80 +50:49:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52875_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 The candidate 52875_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.48024    2461314.98024    13.37    12:24:08.41 +51:35:49.3   3166 1695   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits **** FOUND 12:24:08.39 +51:35:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52878_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 The candidate 52878_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.48024    2461314.98024    13.31    12:29:45.42 +58:23:45.7   3635 5800   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits **** FOUND 12:29:45.30 +58:23:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53051_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 The candidate 53051_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.48024    2461314.98024    13.53    12:55:32.30 +56:10:10.7   5808 4586   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits **** FOUND 12:55:32.41 +56:10:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53054_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 The candidate 53054_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.48024    2461314.98024    13.68    12:22:52.68 +53:20:11.0   3059 2745   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits **** FOUND 12:22:52.59 +53:20:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 29955_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 The candidate 29955_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 01.48024    2461314.98024    9.06    13:12:01.51 +56:22:46.5   7160 4904   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_063231_TTUQ1b1x1_1546513_UxYCCYUO/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-31-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0321.fits **** FOUND 13:12:01.47 +56:22:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-08-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461314.97947486 -observatory V36 13:52:38.70 -13:29:21.4 Mercury (-0.1mag) 14:12:57.26 -20:53:58.3 Venus (-4.8mag) 08:16:18.55 +20:48:01.3 Mars (1.1mag) 09:27:39.76 +15:35:59.4 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:45:18.23 +01:55:11.2 Saturn (0.3mag) 04:12:57.10 +21:00:10.0 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:11:20.03 -00:19:13.1 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:22.74 -23:43:12.7 Pluto (14.5mag) 04:31:07.93 +26:54:26.3 Moon (-11.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Oct 1 06:34 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461314.97947486: 09:27:44.32 +15:35:35.8 Io (9.5mag) 09:27:47.16 +15:35:21.2 Europa (6.2mag) 09:27:24.78 +15:37:20.9 Ganymede (8.0mag) 09:28:09.28 +15:33:23.7 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:26:41.76 +15:57:57.4 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:27:42.26 +15:35:47.2 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:25:49.23 +15:55:01.5 Elara (17.5mag) 09:30:39.63 +14:58:54.4 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:26:58.92 +16:00:28.1 Carme (18.9mag) 00:45:22.39 +01:54:35.7 Titan (8.2mag) 00:45:21.82 +01:54:52.9 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:44:39.25 +01:53:18.6 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:45:33.44 +01:55:01.2 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:43:43.67 +01:43:12.4 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 1 06:34 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461314.97947486: 01:34:35.88 +19:51:26.7 JWST 18:21:37.05 +22:45:28.2 Chandra 14:08:04.28 -61:52:54.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 1 06:34 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461314.97947486 -observatory V36 03:47:38.72 +20:06:05.0 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:16:32.51 -33:43:22.9 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:35:11.02 -71:45:26.7 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:37.38 +34:21:50.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:05:31.85 +48:02:13.9 16.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:25:42.51 +25:34:35.6 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 08:56:32.95 +34:42:01.6 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:25:48.61 +42:00:11.2 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:44:50.57 -13:26:19.0 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 11:59:00.26 +16:48:48.8 16.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:41:13.88 -01:53:18.9 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:02:35.39 +68:39:54.0 16.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:46:51.42 +44:31:39.6 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:36:08.35 +13:19:08.4 17.6mag A/2026 E1 00:49:38.18 +20:03:46.6 18.0mag 2P/Encke 22:47:49.44 -33:36:31.0 14.1mag 10P/Tempel 01:56:33.45 +39:37:55.3 17.0mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:04:32.85 -07:21:31.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:57:15.36 -12:30:11.0 18.0mag 63P/Wild 07:21:33.70 +17:03:09.5 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:08:45.32 +14:44:41.2 16.9mag 88P/Howell 07:02:46.19 +37:14:23.6 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:38:30.21 +17:35:19.0 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:20:23.77 +15:31:28.2 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:42:18.19 -29:17:17.4 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos 06:42:57.59 +19:44:07.4 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 23:21:02.75 -05:59:57.7 13.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:54:38.74 +04:09:40.3 13.5mag 169P/NEAT 03:32:49.11 +05:51:43.6 14.7mag 220P/McNaught 05:45:57.79 +42:56:54.6 15.4mag 260P/McNaught -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.5K Oct 1 06:34 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 1 06:34 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 1 06:34 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 03:55:56.863 -21:40:27.47 AT 2026abho 2026-09-08.69 20.25 21:41:59.234 -17:42:32.33 AT 2026abhn 2026-09-05.57 19.93 01:18:50.812 -55:13:52.86 AT 2026abhm 2026-09-06.66 20.09 03:05:03.855 -17:27:21.38 AT 2026abhl 2026-09-06.65 20.53 23:19:15.440 +26:08:04.82 AT 2026abhk 2026-09-10.98 19.9 19:43:47.131 -19:40:55.30 AT 2026abhj 2026-09-07.37 20.04 20:35:44.483 -21:52:03.37 AT 2026abhi 2026-09-08.47 20.15 20:35:49.026 -45:19:28.04 AT 2026abhh 2026-09-10.45 19.59 00:16:24.706 -27:14:08.82 AT 2026abhg 2026-09-10.54 19.93 02:08:39.680 -37:32:39.33 AT 2026abhf 2026-09-10.60 19.83 23:11:47.633 -37:07:58.89 AT 2026abhe 2026-09-04.57 20.28 19:35:27.473 -15:12:49.83 AT 2026abhd 2026-09-07.40 20.17 00:08:42.747 -32:33:16.67 SN 2026abhc 2026-09-11.54 19.64 01:08:32.310 -43:39:25.61 AT 2026abhb 2026-09-11.59 20.16 02:09:52.276 -24:10:15.63 AT 2026abha 2026-09-11.62 20.21 23:00:24.077 -14:36:02.22 AT 2026abgz 2026-09-10.46 19.83 20:53:01.738 +04:15:02.47 AT 2026abgy 2026-09-11.22 17.7041 21:24:31.615 -49:27:22.62 AT 2026abgx 2026-09-08.53 20.13 01:51:48.327 -27:23:29.92 AT 2026abgw 2026-09-04.46 19.9673 21:00:08.074 -43:38:57.10 AT 2026abgv 2026-09-08.49 19.89 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 1 06:34 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C