NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-04-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits
Field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-04-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-04-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 557326 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 557326 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits

renamed 'UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 482.7200 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 528.8252 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2204.9339 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 637.3289 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2198.9154 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 636.9661 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.56773 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 14.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-01T06:05:35.7182320' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-01T11:05:35.7182320' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61314.4622189584 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-01T11:05:45.6208034' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61314.4623335646 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.995999389887 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 62.0001086029525 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 22.6002777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 29.4836111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.58752257815445 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29509 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29509 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 89.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 895.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 14.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 132.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.600608 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits :) Spent 0.528452 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 14.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-01T06:07:09.9550861' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-01T11:07:09.9550861' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61314.4633096643 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-01T11:07:19.8567153' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61314.4634242593 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.995999321969 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 62.0001087279395 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 22.7636111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 29.5847222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.57017081549806 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29509 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29509 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 89.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 895.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 14.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 132.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.600608 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits :) Spent 0.533217 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits


fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461314.96233470 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Image size: 942.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:37.079 +61:59:47.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 12:00:37.079 +61:59:47.70 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0662 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Image size: 942.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:34.817 +62:00:19.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 12:00:34.817 +62:00:19.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0610 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:37.079 +61:59:47.70 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:34.817 +62:00:19.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00995 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g1aQTzWKUs Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vw5QStc4uh Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2YaMn4lQCY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DcPV0eXUE1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.2640 to +67.4533 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.2640 to 67.4533 deg Loaded 6574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3976 out of 4190 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4190 out of 7332 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.896950 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.896950 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.2640 to +67.4533 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.2640 to 67.4533 deg Loaded 6574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3976 out of 4190 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4190 out of 7332 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9723 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.3313 to +67.4947 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9723 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.3313 to 67.4947 deg Loaded 6542 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3979 out of 4176 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4176 out of 7282 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 2.2 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 2.6 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 2.6 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 14.7 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 14.7 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.g1aQTzWKUs (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, bad_region=0, passed=7332 Got 7332 stars (including 6822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1138 n_q2=1153 n_q3=1306 n_q4=1309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.vw5QStc4uh (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=494, bad_region=0, passed=7282 Got 7282 stars (including 6779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5397) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1150 n_q2=1156 n_q3=1305 n_q4=1295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.2YaMn4lQCY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=285, bad_region=0, passed=4173 Got 4173 stars (including 3885 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4173 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3805 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4173 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3813 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4173 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4173 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 3805 stars left (next iteration limit 4185) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3805 robust_rms=12.857 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.603 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.603 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3805 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.685 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.685 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3805 robust_rms=0.309 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.369 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.369 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3805 robust_rms_before=0.954 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.295 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.309 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.372 worst_region_rms_after=0.369 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.091 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.369 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.372 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.372 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.295 arcsec matched=3805 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits N_match=3805 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1002 n_q2=870 n_q3=1007 n_q4=926 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.DcPV0eXUE1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=277, bad_region=0, passed=4178 Got 4178 stars (including 3899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4178 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3816 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4178 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4178 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4178 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 3815 stars left (next iteration limit 4197) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3815 robust_rms=13.009 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.410 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.410 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3815 robust_rms=0.501 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.717 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.717 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3815 robust_rms=0.334 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.409 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.397 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3815 robust_rms_before=0.962 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.334 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.375 worst_region_rms_after=0.409 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.097 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.397 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.375 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.375 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.303 arcsec matched=3815 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits N_match=3815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1003 n_q2=866 n_q3=1018 n_q4=928 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.205 ref2=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.252 new1=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits sigma_overall=0.299 worst_q_ratio=1.162 new2=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits sigma_overall=0.302 worst_q_ratio=1.279 reference average sigma_overall=0.3745 worst_q_ratio=1.2285 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304_astrometric_residuals.png (3805 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305_astrometric_residuals.png (3815 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01679_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 01679_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    8.60    12:36:23.35 +59:29:13.2   7595 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 12:36:23.34 +59:29:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Image size: 942.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:37.079 +61:59:47.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 12:00:37.079 +61:59:47.70 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0662 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Image size: 942.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:34.817 +62:00:19.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 12:00:34.817 +62:00:19.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0610 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:37.079 +61:59:47.70 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:34.817 +62:00:19.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00995 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QQ8seJ3D7p Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qeoP7BShVt Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2Z5BoOxPnh Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RlLZCwbBA0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec +55.2253 to +67.4860 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec 55.2253 to 67.4860 deg Loaded 6642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4194 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4194 out of 37333 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.792800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.792800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec +55.2253 to +67.4860 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec 55.2253 to 67.4860 deg Loaded 6642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4194 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4194 out of 37333 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 37494 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9724 to 198.6777 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4946 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9724 to 198.6777 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4946 deg Loaded 6625 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4189 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4189 out of 37494 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 24 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 2.1 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.8 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 15.8 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.QQ8seJ3D7p (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1765, bad_region=9, passed=37315 Got 37315 stars (including 35474 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37315 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1136 n_q2=1161 n_q3=1318 n_q4=1294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.qeoP7BShVt (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1739, bad_region=9, passed=37476 Got 37476 stars (including 35663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37476 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1133 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1311 n_q4=1298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.2Z5BoOxPnh (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=721, bad_region=36, passed=21943 Got 21943 stars (including 21155 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21943 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21943 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21943 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21943 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5380) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=12.605 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.486 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.486 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.473 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.706 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.706 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.322 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.381 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.381 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=0.956 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.304 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.322 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.376 worst_region_rms_after=0.381 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.075 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.381 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.376 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.304 arcsec matched=4890 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1268 n_q2=1041 n_q3=1423 n_q4=1158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.RlLZCwbBA0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=848, bad_region=35, passed=22241 Got 22241 stars (including 21328 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22241 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22241 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22241 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22241 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=12.568 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.796 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.796 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.722 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.722 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.416 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.410 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4896 robust_rms_before=0.963 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.309 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.386 worst_region_rms_after=0.416 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.120 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.410 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.386 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.386 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.309 arcsec matched=4896 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=1268 n_q2=1045 n_q3=1421 n_q4=1162 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:48:45.13 +61:04:15.6: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:28:34.53 +60:31:57.9: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:10:00.76 +58:06:43.0: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:35:53.52 +61:33:08.0: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:56:12.75 +61:00:04.6: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:41:27.12 +59:33:49.1: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:10:00.76 +58:06:43.0: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:28:34.53 +60:31:57.9: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:48:45.13 +61:04:15.6: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:00.76 +58:06:43.0: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4328 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:34.53 +60:31:57.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5249 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:48:45.13 +61:04:15.6: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3447 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:35:53.52 +61:33:08.0: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:35:53.52 +61:33:08.0: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3826 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:56:12.75 +61:00:04.6: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:41:27.12 +59:33:49.1: 13.93 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:41:27.12 +59:33:49.1: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0173 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:56:12.75 +61:00:04.6: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8839 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52577_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 52577_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.60    11:12:39.09 +56:47:26.7   0991 0163   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 11:12:38.88 +56:47:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52578_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 52578_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 01.46233    2461314.96233    13.34    12:48:45.12 +61:04:15.8   8292 3166   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.35    12:48:45.14 +61:04:15.5   8295 3162   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52579_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 52579_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 01.46233    2461314.96233    13.49    11:28:34.42 +60:31:58.8   2466 2321   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.58    11:28:34.64 +60:31:57.1   2470 2315   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52580_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 52580_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 01.46233    2461314.96233    13.42    11:10:00.80 +58:06:42.6   0881 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.45    11:10:00.72 +58:06:43.3   0884 0991   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52885_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 52885_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    11.72    12:15:42.33 +57:00:11.0   6202 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 12:15:42.33 +57:00:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53095_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 53095_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    12.68    11:04:04.28 +61:47:50.6   0770 3272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 11:04:04.26 +61:47:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53220_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 53220_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    12.60    12:15:28.64 +56:59:15.0   6184 0276   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 12:15:28.58 +56:59:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53290_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 53290_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.09    11:21:37.10 +57:04:11.8   1755 0259   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 11:21:37.07 +57:04:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53373_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 53373_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.05    11:30:26.90 +63:32:59.4   2715 4124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 11:30:26.89 +63:32:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53637_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 53637_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.17    12:29:46.20 +58:23:49.3   7206 1284   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 12:29:45.81 +58:23:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53703_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 53703_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.54    11:58:21.15 +61:26:11.6   4649 2845   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 11:58:21.17 +61:26:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53713_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 53713_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.46    11:45:01.23 +64:47:38.4   3695 4844   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 11:45:01.37 +64:47:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53716_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 53716_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.66    11:23:14.88 +58:34:10.9   1970 1159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 11:23:14.81 +58:34:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53736_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 53736_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 01.46233    2461314.96233    13.38    12:35:53.47 +61:33:07.4   7313 3247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.38    12:35:53.57 +61:33:08.5   7317 3243   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53781_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 53781_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.52    12:50:42.61 +62:58:07.3   8150 4310   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 12:50:42.47 +62:58:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53788_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 53788_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.75    11:03:33.98 +57:42:48.5   0326 0822   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 11:03:33.96 +57:42:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53792_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 53792_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.47    12:43:29.34 +65:57:22.7   7266 5956   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 12:43:29.23 +65:57:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53994_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 53994_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 01.46233    2461314.96233    13.84    11:56:12.85 +61:00:05.2   4503 2581   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.94    11:56:12.66 +61:00:04.0   4506 2576   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53997_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 53997_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.97    11:59:58.71 +59:05:43.4   4843 1443   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 11:59:58.90 +59:05:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54009_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 54009_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    13.89    11:46:29.96 +61:30:38.1   3797 2866   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 11:46:30.29 +61:30:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54170_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 54170_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 01.46233    2461314.96233    14.01    11:41:27.13 +59:33:50.3   3412 1700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-05-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    14.03    11:41:27.10 +59:33:47.9   3415 1694   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 16217_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 16217_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    12.88    11:00:10.68 +59:51:47.5   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 10366_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 10366_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    11.65    11:52:35.83 +59:47:33.8   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07651_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 07651_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 01.46343    2461314.96343    8.51    12:36:23.35 +59:29:13.2   7595 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_060831_TTUQ1b1x1_284487_T5nhE224/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_06-07-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 12:36:23.34 +59:29:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-04-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461314.96233470 -observatory V36 13:52:33.64 -13:28:46.0 Mercury (-0.1mag) 14:12:56.98 -20:53:51.4 Venus (-4.8mag) 08:16:16.06 +20:48:08.1 Mars (1.1mag) 09:27:39.03 +15:36:02.6 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:45:18.53 +01:55:13.2 Saturn (0.3mag) 04:12:57.17 +21:00:10.2 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:11:20.14 -00:19:12.4 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:22.77 -23:43:12.6 Pluto (14.5mag) 04:30:26.20 +26:52:46.4 Moon (-11.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Oct 1 06:10 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461314.96233470: 09:27:43.28 +15:35:40.8 Io (9.5mag) 09:27:46.67 +15:35:23.2 Europa (6.2mag) 09:27:24.01 +15:37:24.4 Ganymede (8.0mag) 09:28:08.55 +15:33:27.0 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:26:40.97 +15:58:00.7 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:27:41.05 +15:35:53.0 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:25:48.46 +15:55:04.5 Elara (17.5mag) 09:30:38.96 +14:58:57.7 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:26:58.27 +16:00:31.0 Carme (18.9mag) 00:45:22.60 +01:54:37.6 Titan (8.2mag) 00:45:22.04 +01:54:54.7 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:44:39.55 +01:53:20.6 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:45:33.76 +01:55:02.9 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:43:43.98 +01:43:14.3 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 1 06:11 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461314.96233470: 01:34:31.35 +19:51:29.8 JWST 18:18:47.25 +23:21:42.8 Chandra 13:52:50.73 -62:07:09.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 1 06:10 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461314.96233470 -observatory V36 03:47:38.77 +20:06:04.1 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:16:31.72 -33:43:24.3 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:35:10.49 -71:45:22.7 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:37.43 +34:21:48.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:05:32.35 +48:02:10.0 16.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:25:41.99 +25:34:36.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 08:56:32.33 +34:41:55.9 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:25:48.61 +42:00:14.4 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:44:50.36 -13:26:17.9 16.7mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 11:58:58.42 +16:48:53.9 16.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:41:12.89 -01:53:13.7 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:02:31.27 +68:40:12.8 16.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:46:52.50 +44:31:46.3 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:36:07.36 +13:19:02.8 17.6mag A/2026 E1 00:49:40.34 +20:03:51.2 18.0mag 2P/Encke 22:47:48.40 -33:36:41.7 14.1mag 10P/Tempel 01:56:32.01 +39:37:57.2 17.0mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:04:32.15 -07:21:26.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:57:13.28 -12:29:52.7 18.0mag 63P/Wild 07:21:32.15 +17:03:15.8 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:08:46.11 +14:44:43.3 16.9mag 88P/Howell 07:02:42.50 +37:14:03.6 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:38:27.62 +17:35:39.7 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:20:21.60 +15:31:42.2 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:42:15.69 -29:16:58.4 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos 06:42:56.70 +19:44:10.0 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 23:21:14.40 -06:00:58.3 13.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:54:36.46 +04:09:57.0 13.5mag 169P/NEAT 03:32:49.32 +05:51:51.4 14.7mag 220P/McNaught 05:45:55.81 +42:56:39.7 15.4mag 260P/McNaught -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.5K Oct 1 06:10 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 1 06:10 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 1 06:10 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 03:55:56.863 -21:40:27.47 AT 2026abho 2026-09-08.69 20.25 21:41:59.234 -17:42:32.33 AT 2026abhn 2026-09-05.57 19.93 01:18:50.812 -55:13:52.86 AT 2026abhm 2026-09-06.66 20.09 03:05:03.855 -17:27:21.38 AT 2026abhl 2026-09-06.65 20.53 23:19:15.440 +26:08:04.82 AT 2026abhk 2026-09-10.98 19.9 19:43:47.131 -19:40:55.30 AT 2026abhj 2026-09-07.37 20.04 20:35:44.483 -21:52:03.37 AT 2026abhi 2026-09-08.47 20.15 20:35:49.026 -45:19:28.04 AT 2026abhh 2026-09-10.45 19.59 00:16:24.706 -27:14:08.82 AT 2026abhg 2026-09-10.54 19.93 02:08:39.680 -37:32:39.33 AT 2026abhf 2026-09-10.60 19.83 23:11:47.633 -37:07:58.89 AT 2026abhe 2026-09-04.57 20.28 19:35:27.473 -15:12:49.83 AT 2026abhd 2026-09-07.40 20.17 00:08:42.747 -32:33:16.67 SN 2026abhc 2026-09-11.54 19.64 01:08:32.310 -43:39:25.61 AT 2026abhb 2026-09-11.59 20.16 02:09:52.276 -24:10:15.63 AT 2026abha 2026-09-11.62 20.21 23:00:24.077 -14:36:02.22 AT 2026abgz 2026-09-10.46 19.83 20:53:01.738 +04:15:02.47 AT 2026abgy 2026-09-11.22 17.7041 21:24:31.615 -49:27:22.62 AT 2026abgx 2026-09-08.53 20.13 01:51:48.327 -27:23:29.92 AT 2026abgw 2026-09-04.46 19.9673 21:00:08.074 -43:38:57.10 AT 2026abgv 2026-09-08.49 19.89 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 1 06:10 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 82 C