This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2973 2461314.7973 12.59 05:52:33.34 +01:43:44.8
204.53688 -12.25651 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.181 Eucharis 0 -0 0 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:52:33.34 +01:43:44.8: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:52:33.34 +01:43:44.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 01.2974* 05 52 33.34 +01 43 44.8 12.6 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7973,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2973 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2973 2461314.7973 13.74 05:35:01.57 +02:33:54.7
201.61533 -15.69779 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.105 Artemis -1 0 1 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:35:01.57 +02:33:54.7: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:35:01.57 +02:33:54.7: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 01.2974* 05 35 01.57 +02 33 54.7 13.7 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7973,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2973 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.61632350 11.02.2026 02:47:20.350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461082.61632350 11.02.2026 02:47:20.350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461314.79774167 01.10.2026 07:08:34.880 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22571
Objects passed selection criteria: 22473
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16067.8
Average stars matched: 15565.8 (96.8757 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 247048 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 1 02:11:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.61632350 11.02.2026 02:47:20.350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461082.61632350 11.02.2026 02:47:20.350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461314.79774167 01.10.2026 07:08:34.880 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 112
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 151777
Objects passed selection criteria: 151404
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 113201
Average stars matched: 109045 (96.3287 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 550232 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 1 02:12:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461314.79695494
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Image size: 944.9'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:52.392 +05:58:08.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15
Second-epoch image center 05:59:52.392 +05:58:08.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0315 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Image size: 944.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:52.436 +05:58:41.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15
Second-epoch image center 05:59:52.436 +05:58:41.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0253 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:52.392 +05:58:08.55
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:52.436 +05:58:41.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00904 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W62kFZU2p6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Wy3vit97a1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K9paxEGWLp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T90k4zidLv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23947 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9156 to 97.9251 deg, Dec +0.5852 to +11.3169 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9156 to 97.9251 deg, Dec 0.5852 to 11.3169 deg
Loaded 13838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10471 out of 11616 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11616 out of 23947 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.917600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.917600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23947 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9156 to 97.9251 deg, Dec +0.5852 to +11.3169 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9156 to 97.9251 deg, Dec 0.5852 to 11.3169 deg
Loaded 13838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10471 out of 11616 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11616 out of 23947 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23981 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9156 to 97.9135 deg, Dec +0.6076 to +11.3239 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9156 to 97.9135 deg, Dec 0.6076 to 11.3239 deg
Loaded 13821 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10495 out of 11630 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11630 out of 23981 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.3 pix Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.4 mag. Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.W62kFZU2p6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2599, bad_region=0, passed=23947
Got 23947 stars (including 21319 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23947 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=820 n_q2=1207 n_q3=1001 n_q4=1753 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Wy3vit97a1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2508, bad_region=0, passed=23981
Got 23981 stars (including 21438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23981 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits N_match=4780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=829 n_q2=1201 n_q3=1010 n_q4=1740 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.K9paxEGWLp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=666, bad_region=0, passed=8329
Got 8329 stars (including 7656 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8329 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=11.767 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.338 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.338 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=0.870 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.226 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.986 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=0.654 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.942 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.762 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4766 robust_rms_before=1.325 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.460 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.654 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.624 worst_region_rms_after=0.942 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.435 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.762
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.624 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.624 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.460 arcsec matched=4766
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.646 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.495 n_q1=959 n_q2=969 n_q3=1209 n_q4=1629 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.407
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.T90k4zidLv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=648, bad_region=0, passed=8452
Got 8452 stars (including 7787 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8452 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4765 stars left (next iteration limit 5240)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4765 robust_rms=12.045 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.801 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.801 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4765 robust_rms=0.838 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.276 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.000 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4765 robust_rms=0.616 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.007 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.715 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4765 robust_rms_before=1.194 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.455 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.616 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.604 worst_region_rms_after=1.007 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.229 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.715
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.604 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.604 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.455 arcsec matched=4765
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits N_match=4765 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.505 n_q1=962 n_q2=975 n_q3=1204 n_q4=1624 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.360
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits sigma_overall=0.442 worst_q_ratio=1.098
ref2=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.108
new1=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits sigma_overall=0.459 worst_q_ratio=1.407
new2=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.449 worst_q_ratio=1.360
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.103
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032_astrometric_residuals.png (4781 matched stars from wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033_astrometric_residuals.png (4780 matched stars from wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150_astrometric_residuals.png (4766 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4765 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
WARNING: the installed astorb.dat is only 24 bytes, far below the 30000000 bytes expected - it is incomplete and will be re-downloaded
######### Updating astorb.dat #########
### download command ###
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS
curl --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --retry-delay 30 --speed-limit 100 --speed-time 30 --max-time 3600 --insecure --continue-at - --output astorb_dat_new.gz https://kirx.net/~kirx/vast_catalogs/astorb.dat.gz
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 108.3M 0 328.0k 0 0 327.9k 0 05:38 00:01 05:37 328.0k
14 108.3M 14 15.30M 0 0 7.65M 0 00:14 00:01 00:13 7.65M
33 108.3M 33 36.68M 0 0 12.22M 0 00:08 00:03 00:05 12.22M
53 108.3M 53 58.06M 0 0 14.50M 0 00:07 00:04 00:03 14.50M
74 108.3M 74 80.39M 0 0 16.07M 0 00:06 00:05 00:01 16.07M
94 108.3M 94 102.8M 0 0 17.09M 0 00:06 00:06 20.44M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M 0 0 17.27M 0 00:06 00:06 20.44M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M 0 0 17.27M 0 00:06 00:06 20.44M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M 0 0 17.27M 0 00:06 00:06 20.44M
TMP_OUTPUT=astorb_dat_new
### UNPACK_COMMAND ###
We are currently at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS
Will run the unpack command: gunzip astorb_dat_new.gz
Unpack complete
Moved astorb_dat_new to astorb.dat
Successfully updated astorb.dat
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31765_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 31765_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:04.16 +07:30:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31806_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 31806_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:55.91 +07:25:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13836_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 13836_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:55.99 +07:36:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ori-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Image size: 944.9'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:52.392 +05:58:08.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15
Second-epoch image center 05:59:52.392 +05:58:08.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0315 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Image size: 944.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:52.436 +05:58:41.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15
Second-epoch image center 05:59:52.436 +05:58:41.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0253 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:52.392 +05:58:08.55
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:52.436 +05:58:41.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00904 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vUvAq7iDyG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7AP0sCOhCb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GrKOyuTdh2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jJJ6S9Nj5e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 165923 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9025 to 97.9258 deg, Dec +0.5713 to +11.3193 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9025 to 97.9258 deg, Dec 0.5713 to 11.3193 deg
Loaded 13864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8480 out of 12115 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12115 out of 165923 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.768800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.768800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 165923 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9025 to 97.9258 deg, Dec +0.5713 to +11.3193 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9025 to 97.9258 deg, Dec 0.5713 to 11.3193 deg
Loaded 13864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8480 out of 12115 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12115 out of 165923 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 164824 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.8906 to 97.9164 deg, Dec +0.5830 to +11.3271 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.8906 to 97.9164 deg, Dec 0.5830 to 11.3271 deg
Loaded 13866 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8525 out of 12126 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12126 out of 164824 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 103 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.1 pix Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.5 mag. Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vUvAq7iDyG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=50, blended=21856, bad_region=0, passed=165873
Got 165873 stars (including 143783 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 165873 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 165873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 165873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 165873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5262)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits N_match=4786 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=899 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1055 n_q4=1609 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7AP0sCOhCb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=21523, bad_region=1, passed=164771
Got 164771 stars (including 143000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 164771 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4794 stars left (next iteration limit 5274)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits N_match=4794 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=916 n_q2=1211 n_q3=1057 n_q4=1610 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.056
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GrKOyuTdh2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=3, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3139, bad_region=10, passed=62267
Got 62267 stars (including 59040 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62267 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4763 stars left (next iteration limit 5241)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4763 robust_rms=11.925 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.460 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4763 robust_rms=0.870 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.231 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.993 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4763 robust_rms=0.654 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.952 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.772 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4763 robust_rms_before=1.330 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.463 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.654 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.647 worst_region_rms_after=0.952 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.404 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.772
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.647 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.647 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.463 arcsec matched=4763
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits N_match=4763 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.511 n_q1=1007 n_q2=966 n_q3=1178 n_q4=1612 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.442
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jJJ6S9Nj5e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=2, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3203, bad_region=10, passed=62607
Got 62607 stars (including 59295 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62607 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4764 stars left (next iteration limit 5239)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=12.099 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.118 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.118 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=0.837 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.265 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.999 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4764 robust_rms=0.618 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.013 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.715 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4764 robust_rms_before=1.192 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.445 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.618 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.603 worst_region_rms_after=1.013 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.215 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.715
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.603 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.603 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.445 arcsec matched=4764
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits N_match=4764 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.522 n_q1=1002 n_q2=980 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1602 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.309
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-07-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_020930_TTUQ1b1x1_408707_wtH1bamS/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:10:04.59 +09:58:04.8: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:13:31.63 +09:31:26.4: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:28:48.49 +10:13:04.6: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:05:07.20 +00:52:32.7: 9.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:13:31.63 +09:31:26.4: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:28:48.49 +10:13:04.6: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:10:04.59 +09:58:04.8: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:31.63 +09:31:26.4: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0911 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:48.49 +10:13:04.6: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2931 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:10:04.59 +09:58:04.8: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0765 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:20:46.49 +00:49:00.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:05:07.20 +00:52:32.7: 9.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.82 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:07.20 +00:52:32.7: ref_mag=9.82 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1274 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:20:46.49 +00:49:00.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:46.49 +00:49:00.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:13:05.51 +10:17:06.2: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:52:33.34 +01:43:44.8: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:12:53.90 +05:59:59.7: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:13:05.51 +10:17:06.2: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:05.51 +10:17:06.2: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5000 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:52:33.34 +01:43:44.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:12:53.90 +05:59:59.7: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:53.90 +05:59:59.7: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7001 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:03:02.99 +09:01:44.3: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:52:17.29 +09:10:36.6: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:47:07.75 +07:35:12.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:43:23.34 +04:42:15.6: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:03:02.99 +09:01:44.3: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:02.99 +09:01:44.3: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9525 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:52:17.29 +09:10:36.6: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:17.29 +09:10:36.6: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1500 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:47:07.75 +07:35:12.9: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:13:47.21 +09:59:32.4: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:07.75 +07:35:12.9: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2254 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:01:23.48 +07:52:00.6: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:43:23.34 +04:42:15.6: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:23.34 +04:42:15.6: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3497 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:59:11.05 +08:56:22.2: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:13:47.21 +09:59:32.4: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:01:23.48 +07:52:00.6: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:47.21 +09:59:32.4: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2312 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:23.48 +07:52:00.6: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2103 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:09:14.02 +05:17:59.0: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:59:11.05 +08:56:22.2: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:11.05 +08:56:22.2: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3080 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:09:14.02 +05:17:59.0: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:14.02 +05:17:59.0: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3660 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:35:01.57 +02:33:54.7: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:29:57.30 +01:49:46.8: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:35:01.57 +02:33:54.7: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:29:57.30 +01:49:46.8: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:57.30 +01:49:46.8: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8312 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191130.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192109.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190099_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190099_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190106_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190106_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:49.33 +01:46:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190107_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190107_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190108_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190108_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:09.57 +01:39:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190112_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190112_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:21.56 +09:43:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190113_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190113_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:19.30 +02:41:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190116_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190116_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:44.15 +08:18:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190117_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190117_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:58.88 +02:44:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190118_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190118_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190123_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190123_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190124_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190124_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:13.83 +09:13:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190126_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190126_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:24.04 +10:13:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190127_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190127_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:20.67 +07:17:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190129_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190129_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:26.63 +01:11:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190159_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190159_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:30.99 +09:13:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190258_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190258_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190387_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190387_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:55.74 +07:25:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190449_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190449_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:01.31 +06:28:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190527_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190527_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:57.58 +06:22:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190579_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190579_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190621_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190621_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:24.50 +04:11:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190675_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190675_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:12.53 +00:51:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190730_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190730_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:53.77 +04:36:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190742_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190742_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:40.13 +00:56:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190884_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190884_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:50.86 +04:17:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190957_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190957_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:10.14 +09:11:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191048_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191048_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:21.59 +03:33:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191057_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191057_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:19.75 +02:19:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191096_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191096_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191098_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191098_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:05.01 +05:56:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191107_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191107_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:16.53 +10:33:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191130_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 191130_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191150_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191150_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:59.92 +09:15:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191179_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191179_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:22.04 +02:03:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191192_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191192_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:28.06 +09:37:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191200_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191200_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:49.43 +02:16:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191216_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191216_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:14.22 +10:19:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191223_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191223_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:23.32 +02:02:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191258_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191258_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:33.39 +09:52:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191290_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191290_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:14.29 +05:14:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191296_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191296_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:06.14 +05:55:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191309_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191309_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191310_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191310_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:23.18 +10:45:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191320_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191320_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:15.00 +08:25:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191323_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191323_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:10.22 +04:23:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191351_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191351_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:34.04 +01:11:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191366_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191366_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:48.04 +08:29:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191396_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191396_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:42.54 +05:40:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191411_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191411_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:27.39 +03:56:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191431_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191431_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:02.64 +09:58:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191476_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191476_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:08.62 +04:04:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191490_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191490_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:07.67 +04:40:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191492_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191492_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:50.71 +08:58:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191494_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191494_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:04.98 +07:33:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191499_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191499_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:31.85 +09:19:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191505_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191505_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:27.22 +09:45:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191513_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191513_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:10.24 +05:07:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191521_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191521_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:34.00 +06:04:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191526_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191526_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191551_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191551_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:22.19 +06:35:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191557_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191557_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:09.00 +05:58:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191562_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191562_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:38.70 +08:45:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191602_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191602_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:22.04 +10:45:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191614_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191614_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:44.65 +03:35:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191621_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191621_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191643_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191643_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191645_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191645_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:30.35 +09:36:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191669_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191669_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:12.98 +03:46:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191671_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191671_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:19.55 +08:11:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191674_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191674_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:04.67 +08:39:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191678_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191678_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:49.91 +05:25:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191728_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191728_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191763_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191763_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:31.84 +01:46:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191774_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191774_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.80 +08:58:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191866_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191866_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191895_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191895_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191898_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191898_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:03.06 +02:52:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191910_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191910_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:19.35 +09:17:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191922_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191922_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:27.19 +05:25:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191937_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191937_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191944_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191944_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:24.53 +06:22:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191961_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191961_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:20.83 +02:45:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191985_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191985_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:07.91 +04:11:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191993_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 191993_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192002_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 192002_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:47.70 +02:24:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192008_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 192008_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.19 +06:30:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192034_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 192034_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:12.07 +08:58:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192054_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 192054_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:32.52 +07:08:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192059_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 192059_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:22.98 +10:16:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192109_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 192109_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192145_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 192145_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:51.03 +08:04:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178555_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 178555_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111548_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 111548_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:45.89 +08:27:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81101_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 81101_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:42.07 +06:43:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31904_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 31904_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:35.78 +03:31:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20895_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 20895_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:58.39 +02:34:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165326_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 165326_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18414_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 18414_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:59.37 +02:20:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84127_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 84127_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:28.87 +06:52:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109876_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 109876_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:44.74 +08:20:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102420_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 102420_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:56.03 +07:36:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07628_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 07628_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:33.27 +01:27:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73989_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 73989_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_02-08-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks