This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2390 2461314.7390 12.33 20:49:26.45 -09:22:15.7
38.03135 -30.44152 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.389 Industria -0 0 0 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:26.45 -09:22:15.7: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:26.45 -09:22:15.7: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7390,12.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2390 12.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2390 2461314.7390 13.40 20:45:56.94 -13:13:11.7
33.54539 -31.29116 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.38 Leda 1 -0 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:45:56.94 -13:13:11.7: 15.56 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:45:56.94 -13:13:11.7: 15.64 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.60 +/- 0.25
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7390,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2390 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2390 2461314.7390 13.66 20:32:16.46 -12:05:46.3
33.15223 -27.78811 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas 0 -0 0 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:32:16.46 -12:05:46.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:32:16.46 -12:05:46.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 01.2390* 20 32 16.46 -12 05 46.3 13.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7390,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2390 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2390 2461314.7390 13.75 20:16:51.73 -14:13:09.3
29.27843 -25.22510 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.273 Atropos -0 -0 0 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:16:51.73 -14:13:09.3: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:16:51.73 -14:13:09.3: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 01.2390* 20 16 51.73 -14 13 09.3 13.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7390,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2390 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2390 2461314.7390 14.10 20:35:16.45 -10:46:37.3
34.85523 -27.90231 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.582 Olympia 0 -0 0 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:16.45 -10:46:37.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:16.45 -10:46:37.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 01.2390* 20 35 16.45 -10 46 37.3 14.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7390,14.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2390 14.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461314.73944262 01.10.2026 05:44:37.842 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13649
Objects passed selection criteria: 13626
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12457.8
Average stars matched: 12215.8 (98.0574 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239228 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 1 00:47:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461314.73944262 01.10.2026 05:44:37.842 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 101
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 90325
Objects passed selection criteria: 90182
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 84832.8
Average stars matched: 82306.5 (97.0221 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 587848 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 1 00:48:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461314.73863502
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:14.342 -10:02:25.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:14.342 -10:02:25.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0647 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.454 -10:01:53.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.454 -10:01:53.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0555 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:14.342 -10:02:25.87
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:17.454 -10:01:53.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01557 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MOIeaA36KM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I6PSM6Qfcb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gPTPXiTM9z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9ogCrkYFW6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7839 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 14495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.2 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.MOIeaA36KM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=755, bad_region=0, passed=14476
Got 14476 stars (including 13702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.220 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1163 n_q2=1365 n_q3=1107 n_q4=1240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.I6PSM6Qfcb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=763, bad_region=0, passed=14495
Got 14495 stars (including 13716 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1171 n_q2=1357 n_q3=1105 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gPTPXiTM9z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=616, bad_region=0, passed=10666
Got 10666 stars (including 10038 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10666 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=13.136 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.134 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.134 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.536 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.875 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.875 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.334 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.450 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.450 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=0.839 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.281 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.334 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.446 worst_region_rms_after=0.450 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.909 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.450
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.446 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.446 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.281 arcsec matched=4881
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=1209 n_q2=1344 n_q3=1136 n_q4=1192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9ogCrkYFW6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=615, bad_region=0, passed=10504
Got 10504 stars (including 9876 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=13.146 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.042 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.042 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.490 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.988 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.988 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.457 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.457 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=0.818 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.344 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.440 worst_region_rms_after=0.457 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.018 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.457
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.440 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.440 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.290 arcsec matched=4879
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1206 n_q2=1346 n_q3=1135 n_q4=1192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.134
ref2=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits sigma_overall=0.292 worst_q_ratio=1.154
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.131
reference average sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.1375
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095_astrometric_residuals.png (4879 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Another copy of lib/update_offline_catalogs.sh is updating the catalogs right now - not downloading anything in this run
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.3: 10.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.3: 10.16 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.3: ref_mag=10.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3968 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20867_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 20867_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20881_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 20881_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.06 -06:09:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20887_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 20887_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.49 -13:15:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20890_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 20890_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:28.21 -05:17:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20914_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 20914_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:08.56 -14:47:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20921_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 20921_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.64 -07:32:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20936_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 20936_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:01.82 -12:46:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 20445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.21 -13:18:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00299_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 00299_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:56.35 -05:08:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:13.34 -07:21:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:14.342 -10:02:25.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:14.342 -10:02:25.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0647 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.454 -10:01:53.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.454 -10:01:53.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0555 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:14.342 -10:02:25.87
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:17.454 -10:01:53.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01557 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OlqVeUpeo4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0cFhOBpgnu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CzsWaphK9B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KVeTCmoRUH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.648000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.648000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 95800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Loaded 10308 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7289 out of 8389 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8389 out of 95800 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.4 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OlqVeUpeo4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=6181, bad_region=13, passed=95412
Got 95412 stars (including 89061 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95412 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=1203 n_q2=1306 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0cFhOBpgnu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=6280, bad_region=13, passed=95780
Got 95780 stars (including 89335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95780 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=1213 n_q2=1293 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CzsWaphK9B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3913, bad_region=31, passed=74754
Got 74754 stars (including 70685 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74754 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=13.226 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.416 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.416 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.532 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.908 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.908 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.335 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.447 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.447 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4885 robust_rms_before=0.844 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.286 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.335 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.429 worst_region_rms_after=0.447 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.919 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.447
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.429 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.429 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.286 arcsec matched=4885
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1212 n_q2=1319 n_q3=1151 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KVeTCmoRUH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3916, bad_region=35, passed=75526
Got 75526 stars (including 71458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75526 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=13.310 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.494 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.494 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.499 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.971 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.971 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.459 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.459 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=0.824 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.292 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.450 worst_region_rms_after=0.459 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.017 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.459
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.450 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.450 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.292 arcsec matched=4886
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=1229 n_q2=1320 n_q3=1140 n_q4=1197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-43-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004600_TTUQ1b1x1_3282492_0XcOv65u/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:02:02.03 -05:31:02.0: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:26:27.08 -04:50:23.9: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:14:22.40 -09:39:54.8: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:58:17.60 -15:08:49.9: 14.16 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:23:12.67 -06:39:00.6: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:14:20.10 -07:37:55.8: 14.25 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:47:55.23 -12:45:50.2: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:50:56.79 -07:11:47.4: 14.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:10.72 -05:00:16.0: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:11:17.77 -11:36:17.3: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:47:55.23 -12:45:50.2: 14.22 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:10.72 -05:00:16.0: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:02:02.03 -05:31:02.0: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:50:56.79 -07:11:47.4: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:58:17.60 -15:08:49.9: 13.93 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:14:20.10 -07:37:55.8: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:26:27.08 -04:50:23.9: 14.29 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:23:12.67 -06:39:00.6: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:14:22.40 -09:39:54.8: 14.33 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:55.23 -12:45:50.2: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3661 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:10.72 -05:00:16.0: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2475 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:02.03 -05:31:02.0: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5252 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:27.08 -04:50:23.9: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6077 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:20.10 -07:37:55.8: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2824 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:17.60 -15:08:49.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2185 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:12.67 -06:39:00.6: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0978 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:56.79 -07:11:47.4: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5995 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:22.40 -09:39:54.8: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4013 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:11:17.77 -11:36:17.3: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:17.77 -11:36:17.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9358 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:18:47.86 -09:56:31.8: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:09:39.34 -07:10:10.8: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:29:24.60 -08:14:14.6: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:14.69 -07:49:50.6: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:26:51.13 -14:10:43.3: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:10:39.16 -06:09:37.4: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:10.99 -13:16:26.8: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:30:29.64 -08:04:41.2: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:43:37.21 -10:58:56.0: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:32.99 -06:45:09.7: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:18:47.86 -09:56:31.8: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:47.86 -09:56:31.8: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1244 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:26:51.13 -14:10:43.3: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:09:39.34 -07:10:10.8: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:29:24.60 -08:14:14.6: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:51.13 -14:10:43.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6558 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:39.34 -07:10:10.8: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8347 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:10:39.16 -06:09:37.4: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:30:29.64 -08:04:41.2: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:14.69 -07:49:50.6: 13.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:43:37.21 -10:58:56.0: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:10.99 -13:16:26.8: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:24.60 -08:14:14.6: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0737 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:39.16 -06:09:37.4: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6968 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:29.64 -08:04:41.2: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8079 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:14.69 -07:49:50.6: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0750 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:37.21 -10:58:56.0: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9554 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:10.99 -13:16:26.8: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9002 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:32.99 -06:45:09.7: 13.63 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:32.99 -06:45:09.7: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6519 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:24:13.01 -12:49:25.9: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:50:25.09 -06:04:11.9: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:59:45.56 -07:16:27.3: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:04:07.56 -09:24:52.8: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:56:15.49 -05:35:48.2: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:30:48.91 -08:16:32.9: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:00:46.37 -14:44:33.8: 13.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:08:28.38 -09:13:50.0: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:44:30.41 -08:15:55.0: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:24:13.01 -12:49:25.9: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:01.19 -05:39:54.5: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:13.01 -12:49:25.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4227 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:59:45.56 -07:16:27.3: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:00:46.37 -14:44:33.8: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:50:25.09 -06:04:11.9: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:45.56 -07:16:27.3: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1190 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:08:28.38 -09:13:50.0: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:46.37 -14:44:33.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5030 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:30:48.91 -08:16:32.9: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:04:07.56 -09:24:52.8: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:56:15.49 -05:35:48.2: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:25.09 -06:04:11.9: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3556 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:28.38 -09:13:50.0: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8401 delta=-1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:07.56 -09:24:52.8: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2621 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:15.49 -05:35:48.2: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5009 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:48.91 -08:16:32.9: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4118 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:44:30.41 -08:15:55.0: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:30.41 -08:15:55.0: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8395 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:01.19 -05:39:54.5: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:01.19 -05:39:54.5: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9389 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:36:45.28 -10:36:11.7: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:02:28.56 -15:24:46.3: 12.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:51:44.20 -08:13:09.0: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:02:20.81 -09:40:08.0: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.5: 10.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:26.45 -09:22:15.7: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:48:58.25 -06:44:22.9: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:40.15 -06:42:38.0: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:02:20.81 -09:40:08.0: 10.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:20.81 -09:40:08.0: ref_mag=10.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5580 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:36:45.28 -10:36:11.7: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.5: 10.35 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:51:44.20 -08:13:09.0: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:02:28.56 -15:24:46.3: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:26.45 -09:22:15.7: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:45.28 -10:36:11.7: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3178 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.5: ref_mag=10.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5242 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:44.20 -08:13:09.0: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9942 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:28.56 -15:24:46.3: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8077 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:45:56.94 -13:13:11.7: 15.56 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:28.12 -12:56:36.5: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:48:58.25 -06:44:22.9: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:58.25 -06:44:22.9: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2820 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:40.15 -06:42:38.0: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:40.15 -06:42:38.0: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4468 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:45:56.94 -13:13:11.7: 15.64 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.60 +/- 0.25
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:28.12 -12:56:36.5: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:45:56.94 -13:13:11.7: ref_mag=15.60 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=13.3946 delta=2.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:28.12 -12:56:36.5: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3644 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:59:14.58 -09:06:49.9: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:41:50.22 -10:57:26.2: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:32:16.46 -12:05:46.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:16:51.73 -14:13:09.3: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:39.86 -11:51:49.9: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:22.77 -08:15:06.4: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:32:16.46 -12:05:46.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:59:14.58 -09:06:49.9: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:41:50.22 -10:57:26.2: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:14.58 -09:06:49.9: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7089 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:50.22 -10:57:26.2: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7914 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:22:38.85 -09:00:31.8: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:16:51.73 -14:13:09.3: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:39.86 -11:51:49.9: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:22.77 -08:15:06.4: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:39.86 -11:51:49.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9099 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:22.77 -08:15:06.4: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8838 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:48:09.24 -06:00:30.9: 14.08 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:22:38.85 -09:00:31.8: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:38.85 -09:00:31.8: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8838 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:16.45 -10:46:37.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:03:20.32 -05:52:45.8: 14.77 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:26:39.49 -07:53:34.3: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:01.19 -06:30:25.2: 14.40 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:48:09.24 -06:00:30.9: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:09.24 -06:00:30.9: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9804 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:16.45 -10:46:37.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:26:39.49 -07:53:34.3: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:01.19 -06:30:25.2: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:03:20.32 -05:52:45.8: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:03:11.03 -07:51:52.0: 14.65 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:01.19 -06:30:25.2: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3391 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:39.49 -07:53:34.3: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1460 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:20.32 -05:52:45.8: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3693 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:03:11.03 -07:51:52.0: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:11.03 -07:51:52.0: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3901 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:01:01.40 -13:12:54.8: 14.42 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:04:04.49 -15:03:24.9: 14.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:37:24.38 -10:48:50.7: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:02:14.20 -12:53:41.1: 14.73 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:01:01.40 -13:12:54.8: 14.78 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:01.40 -13:12:54.8: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3892 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:37:24.38 -10:48:50.7: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:04:04.49 -15:03:24.9: 14.49 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:02:14.20 -12:53:41.1: 14.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:24.38 -10:48:50.7: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4312 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:14.20 -12:53:41.1: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2110 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:04.49 -15:03:24.9: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3191 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:04:04.47 -12:14:04.0: 14.40 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:04:04.47 -12:14:04.0: 15.29 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:20.21 -08:18:34.7: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:04.47 -12:14:04.0: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5176 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:56:12.08 -11:44:09.0: 14.61 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:02:34.74 -13:58:32.9: 14.48 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:14:17.39 -10:25:05.0: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:20.21 -08:18:34.7: 14.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:20.21 -08:18:34.7: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5382 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:02:34.74 -13:58:32.9: 14.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:34.74 -13:58:32.9: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2423 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:56:12.08 -11:44:09.0: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:14:17.39 -10:25:05.0: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:12.08 -11:44:09.0: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4487 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:17.39 -10:25:05.0: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4951 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:28.91 -06:03:20.3: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:28.91 -06:03:20.3: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:28.91 -06:03:20.3: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3744 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:36.93 -07:10:42.5: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:00:02.19 -10:17:36.8: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:05:05.88 -06:45:08.8: 14.77 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:41:55.80 -14:08:36.6: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:36.93 -07:10:42.5: 14.80 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:36.93 -07:10:42.5: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5198 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:00:02.19 -10:17:36.8: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:41:55.80 -14:08:36.6: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:05:05.88 -06:45:08.8: 14.88 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:02.19 -10:17:36.8: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4720 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:55.80 -14:08:36.6: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4259 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:05.88 -06:45:08.8: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6364 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:33.36 -14:33:41.4: 15.03 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:21:33.09 -06:10:25.0: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:33.36 -14:33:41.4: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:33.36 -14:33:41.4: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5049 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:56:10.81 -09:13:32.4: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:29.50 -05:21:44.4: 14.39 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:01:24.57 -13:21:23.7: 14.99 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:21:33.09 -06:10:25.0: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:56:10.81 -09:13:32.4: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:01:24.57 -13:21:23.7: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:29.50 -05:21:44.4: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.25
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:24.57 -13:21:23.7: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=14.2259 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:10.81 -09:13:32.4: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5983 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:29.50 -05:21:44.4: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6155 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:51:55.42 -11:53:36.0: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:51:55.42 -11:53:36.0: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:55.42 -11:53:36.0: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6042 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:50:31.99 -07:44:35.7: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:03:12.76 -10:32:43.2: 14.36 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:57.56 -10:25:40.5: 15.14 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:50:31.99 -07:44:35.7: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:03:12.76 -10:32:43.2: 14.66 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:31.99 -07:44:35.7: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6961 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:12.76 -10:32:43.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4923 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:57.56 -10:25:40.5: 14.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:57.56 -10:25:40.5: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6151 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:37:38.39 -14:42:23.1: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:37:38.39 -14:42:23.1: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:38.39 -14:42:23.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5924 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out114340.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113780.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113939.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114019.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114062.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114182.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113601_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113601_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113602_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113602_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113610_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113610_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113613_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113613_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113617_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113617_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113619_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113619_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113623_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113623_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113632_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113632_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113633_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113633_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:40.33 -06:34:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113634_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113634_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113636_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113636_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113637_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113637_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113640_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113640_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113642_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113642_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113650_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113650_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113655_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113655_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113664_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113664_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113665_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113665_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113668_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113668_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113670_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113670_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113672_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113672_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:01:53.70 -14:22:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113674_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113674_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113676_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113676_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113677_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113677_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113678_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113678_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113679_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113679_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113682_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113682_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113683_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113683_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113684_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113684_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113685_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113685_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113686_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113686_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113690_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113690_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113692_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113692_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113693_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113693_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113747_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113747_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:40.63 -08:56:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113780_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 113780_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113784_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113784_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113824_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113824_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113872_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113872_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:15.45 -05:43:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113887_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113887_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:54.00 -07:43:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113889_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113889_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:39.22 -07:01:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113912_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113912_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113933_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113933_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113939_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 113939_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113955_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113955_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113971_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 113971_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:28.08 -06:01:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114004_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114004_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:04:10.92 -14:48:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114013_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114013_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114019_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 114019_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114035_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114035_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114062_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 114062_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114072_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114072_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:03.93 -05:29:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114077_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114077_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114083_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114083_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114092_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114092_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:26.75 -06:23:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114112_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114112_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114116_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114116_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:24.74 -07:54:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:40.84 -09:18:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114141_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114141_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114182_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 114182_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114183_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114183_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114186_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114186_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114203_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114203_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114222_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114222_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114224_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114224_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114235_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114235_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114250_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114250_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114251_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114251_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114262_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114262_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114279_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114279_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114293_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114293_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114295_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114295_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114304_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114304_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114309_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114309_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114314_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114314_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114316_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114316_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114319_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114319_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114321_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114321_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114323_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114323_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114340_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114340_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:33.09 -06:10:25.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.751 4217977640695311488 305.38796434200 -06.17342250351 15.3870 14.8925 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.751#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114350_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114350_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114351_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114351_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114364_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114364_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114371_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114371_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114377_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114377_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114381_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114381_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114386_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114386_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114406_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 114406_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.64 -07:32:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06265_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 06265_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:28.21 -05:17:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 71630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.49 -13:15:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76713_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 76713_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:01.83 -12:46:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17844_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 17844_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.06 -06:09:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 71908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.21 -13:18:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:08.55 -14:47:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:13.34 -07:21:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01709_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 01709_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-01_00-44-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks