This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2284 2461314.7284 12.40 20:49:26.44 -09:22:15.3
38.03145 -30.44144 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.389 Industria -0 -0 0 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:26.44 -09:22:15.3: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:26.44 -09:22:15.3: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7284,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2284 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2284 2461314.7284 13.40 20:45:56.91 -13:13:11.3
33.54545 -31.29100 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.38 Leda -0 0 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:45:56.91 -13:13:11.3: 15.57 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:45:56.91 -13:13:11.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.34
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7284,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2284 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2284 2461314.7284 13.68 20:32:16.34 -12:05:44.2
33.15260 -27.78743 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas 0 -0 0 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:32:16.34 -12:05:44.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:32:16.34 -12:05:44.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 01.2284* 20 32 16.34 -12 05 44.2 13.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7284,13.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2284 13.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2284 2461314.7284 14.07 20:35:16.42 -10:46:31.8
34.85674 -27.90155 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.582 Olympia -0 -1 1 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:16.42 -10:46:31.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:16.42 -10:46:31.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 01.2284* 20 35 16.42 -10 46 31.8 14.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7284,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2284 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 01.2284 2461314.7284 14.39 20:52:53.74 -06:01:26.5
41.92684 -29.68667 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.803 Picka -3 2 4 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:52:53.74 -06:01:26.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:52:53.74 -06:01:26.5: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461314.7284,14.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261001.2284 14.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461314.72865512 01.10.2026 05:29:05.802 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10474
Objects passed selection criteria: 10465
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9350.75
Average stars matched: 9117.75 (97.5082 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237300 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 1 00:44:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461314.72865512 01.10.2026 05:29:05.802 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 133
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 70708
Objects passed selection criteria: 70583
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 65892.5
Average stars matched: 63603.2 (96.5258 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 533808 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Oct 1 00:45:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461314.72812307
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:37.920 -09:57:47.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:37.920 -09:57:47.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0897 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:41.110 -09:58:23.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:41.110 -09:58:23.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1019 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:37.920 -09:57:47.93
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:41.110 -09:58:23.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01637 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ztQjKVfolO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vbHB9mgyoc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W9iyZw2cWB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Uu8IA4gZAN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7839 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 14495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.2 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ztQjKVfolO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=755, bad_region=3560, passed=14476
Got 14476 stars (including 10329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1501 n_q2=996 n_q3=1414 n_q4=964 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vbHB9mgyoc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=763, bad_region=3538, passed=14495
Got 14495 stars (including 10373 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1511 n_q2=992 n_q3=1419 n_q4=958 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.W9iyZw2cWB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=595, bad_region=2463, passed=10404
Got 10404 stars (including 7449 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10404 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=7.587 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.371 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.371 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.973 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.973 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.331 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.454 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.454 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=0.791 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.331 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.497 worst_region_rms_after=0.454 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.038 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.454
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.497 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.497 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.320 arcsec matched=4873
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=1503 n_q2=1021 n_q3=1409 n_q4=940 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Uu8IA4gZAN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=627, bad_region=2479, passed=10297
Got 10297 stars (including 7298 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10297 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=7.551 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.554 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.554 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.000 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.000 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.480 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.480 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=0.787 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.489 worst_region_rms_after=0.480 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.080 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.480
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.489 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.489 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.343 arcsec matched=4874
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=1500 n_q2=1020 n_q3=1409 n_q4=945 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.039
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.265 worst_q_ratio=1.163
ref2=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.277 worst_q_ratio=1.138
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.031
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.039
reference average sigma_overall=0.271 worst_q_ratio=1.1505
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.90 -07:47:31.6: 10.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:02:20.79 -09:40:08.7: 9.88 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.90 -07:47:31.6: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:02:20.79 -09:40:08.7: 9.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.18 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.89 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.90 -07:47:31.6: ref_mag=10.18 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3912 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:20.79 -09:40:08.7: ref_mag=9.89 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3428 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20677_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 20677_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20678_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 20678_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20697_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 20697_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:36.72 -12:31:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20857_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 20857_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.65 -07:32:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:13.32 -07:21:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:37.920 -09:57:47.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:37.920 -09:57:47.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0897 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:41.110 -09:58:23.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:41.110 -09:58:23.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1019 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:37.920 -09:57:47.93
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:41.110 -09:58:23.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01637 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.95yMnBvNT8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QXSor9dCIK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FiP1vsc2uY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MkcWjRUQKl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.637550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.637550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 95800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Loaded 10308 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7289 out of 8389 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8389 out of 95800 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 93 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.4 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.95yMnBvNT8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=6181, bad_region=22296, passed=95415
Got 95415 stars (including 68383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1535 n_q2=964 n_q3=1443 n_q4=936 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QXSor9dCIK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=6280, bad_region=22525, passed=95786
Got 95786 stars (including 68372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95786 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1544 n_q2=948 n_q3=1446 n_q4=947 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FiP1vsc2uY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=4074, bad_region=12386, passed=71170
Got 71170 stars (including 55612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71170 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=7.531 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.524 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.524 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.444 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.958 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.958 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.332 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.468 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.468 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.800 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.332 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.482 worst_region_rms_after=0.468 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.046 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.468
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.482 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.482 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.316 arcsec matched=4880
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=1519 n_q2=1005 n_q3=1432 n_q4=924 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MkcWjRUQKl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=4196, bad_region=12511, passed=72463
Got 72463 stars (including 56689 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72463 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63255 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63255 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63255 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=7.437 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.366 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.366 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.980 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.980 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.490 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.490 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=0.793 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.478 worst_region_rms_after=0.490 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.096 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.490
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.478 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.478 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.330 arcsec matched=4881
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=1513 n_q2=1010 n_q3=1428 n_q4=930 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-28-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-01_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_004216_TTUQ2b1x1_3131230_FRUj2ncr/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Another copy of lib/update_offline_catalogs.sh is updating the catalogs right now - not downloading anything in this run
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:30:10.39 -07:01:24.2: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:41:41.16 -13:13:16.4: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:32:50.83 -12:45:36.8: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:29:24.52 -08:14:14.6: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:50:29.33 -13:41:10.2: 14.19 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:50:57.61 -06:58:02.4: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:50:35.04 -07:41:20.4: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:14.70 -07:49:49.6: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:49.11 -12:42:22.3: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:19.64 -11:31:32.6: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:32:50.83 -12:45:36.8: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:19.64 -11:31:32.6: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:29:24.52 -08:14:14.6: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:50:29.33 -13:41:10.2: 14.25 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:41:41.16 -13:13:16.4: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:30:10.39 -07:01:24.2: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:49.11 -12:42:22.3: 14.26 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:14.70 -07:49:49.6: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:50:57.61 -06:58:02.4: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:50:35.04 -07:41:20.4: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:50.83 -12:45:36.8: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2051 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:24.52 -08:14:14.6: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1621 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:29.33 -13:41:10.2: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2628 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:19.64 -11:31:32.6: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1387 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:41.16 -13:13:16.4: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5505 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:10.39 -07:01:24.2: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7185 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:49.11 -12:42:22.3: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2095 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:57.61 -06:58:02.4: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2469 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:14.70 -07:49:49.6: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1499 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:35.04 -07:41:20.4: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1597 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:16.12 -07:57:46.5: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:00.37 -12:04:01.0: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:38:24.79 -09:59:12.7: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:32:06.65 -10:33:39.6: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:10.97 -13:16:26.7: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:40:02.97 -08:19:31.0: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:59:52.48 -06:13:20.1: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:18:39.28 -10:57:31.0: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:41:52.23 -11:34:49.2: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:18.42 -06:27:15.0: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:16.12 -07:57:46.5: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:40:02.97 -08:19:31.0: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:00.37 -12:04:01.0: 13.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:38:24.79 -09:59:12.7: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:16.12 -07:57:46.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0080 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:32:06.65 -10:33:39.6: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:41:52.23 -11:34:49.2: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:02.97 -08:19:31.0: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8910 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:00.37 -12:04:01.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1480 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:18:39.28 -10:57:31.0: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:24.79 -09:59:12.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0859 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:18.42 -06:27:15.0: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:59:52.48 -06:13:20.1: 13.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:10.97 -13:16:26.7: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:06.65 -10:33:39.6: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9921 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:52.23 -11:34:49.2: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9060 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:39.28 -10:57:31.0: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0089 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:18.42 -06:27:15.0: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8718 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:10.97 -13:16:26.7: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9285 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:52.48 -06:13:20.1: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0241 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:31:48.89 -07:42:35.1: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:50:35.94 -11:07:52.0: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:30:29.64 -08:04:40.8: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:30.64 -05:40:07.7: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:26:51.10 -14:10:42.9: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:52:32.93 -13:52:57.4: 13.68 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:24:13.00 -12:49:27.2: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:04.56 -12:39:26.0: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:46:52.09 -11:52:15.9: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:00:43.05 -07:38:38.6: 13.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:26:51.10 -14:10:42.9: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:31:48.89 -07:42:35.1: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:04.56 -12:39:26.0: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:30:29.64 -08:04:40.8: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:30.64 -05:40:07.7: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:50:35.94 -11:07:52.0: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:46:52.09 -11:52:15.9: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:24:13.00 -12:49:27.2: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:51.10 -14:10:42.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5794 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:52:32.93 -13:52:57.4: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:04.56 -12:39:26.0: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6549 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:48.89 -07:42:35.1: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6883 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:00:43.05 -07:38:38.6: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:30.64 -05:40:07.7: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9846 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:29.64 -08:04:40.8: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7966 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:35.94 -11:07:52.0: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7686 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:52.09 -11:52:15.9: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9064 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:13.00 -12:49:27.2: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5827 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:32.93 -13:52:57.4: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7997 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:43.05 -07:38:38.6: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6486 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:15.23 -13:07:20.6: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:59:45.56 -07:16:28.1: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:43:24.39 -06:22:29.6: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:44.52 -13:55:26.5: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:00.34 -09:23:40.8: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:28.42 -11:40:46.2: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:20.74 -08:10:12.8: 11.08 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.7: 10.43 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:02:20.79 -09:40:08.7: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:15.23 -13:07:20.6: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:59:45.56 -07:16:28.1: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:15.23 -13:07:20.6: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5377 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:00.34 -09:23:40.8: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:43:24.39 -06:22:29.6: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:45.56 -07:16:28.1: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9145 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:26.44 -09:22:15.3: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:44.52 -13:55:26.5: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:28.42 -11:40:46.2: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:20.74 -08:10:12.8: 11.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.7: 10.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:02:20.79 -09:40:08.7: 10.16 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:00.34 -09:23:40.8: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4827 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:24.39 -06:22:29.6: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9675 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:44.52 -13:55:26.5: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9562 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:28.42 -11:40:46.2: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9698 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.09 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.7: ref_mag=10.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5097 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:20.79 -09:40:08.7: ref_mag=10.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4021 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:20.74 -08:10:12.8: ref_mag=11.09 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4130 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:26.44 -09:22:15.3: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:00:38.26 -12:38:09.5: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:32:16.34 -12:05:44.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:45:56.91 -13:13:11.3: 15.57 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:03.13 -08:11:45.6: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:41:50.15 -10:57:25.9: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:37:28.65 -06:46:20.1: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:59:14.60 -09:06:50.2: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:32:16.34 -12:05:44.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:45:56.91 -13:13:11.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:03.13 -08:11:45.6: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:00:38.26 -12:38:09.5: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:31.23 -06:13:58.2: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:45:56.91 -13:13:11.3: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=13.4000 delta=2.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:03.13 -08:11:45.6: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5220 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:41:50.15 -10:57:25.9: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:37:28.65 -06:46:20.1: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:38.26 -12:38:09.5: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3781 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:59:14.60 -09:06:50.2: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:50.15 -10:57:25.9: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6935 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:28.65 -06:46:20.1: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6385 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:14.60 -09:06:50.2: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8303 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:22.74 -08:15:05.8: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:31.23 -06:13:58.2: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:31.23 -06:13:58.2: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8763 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:37:33.71 -06:24:33.7: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:39.73 -11:51:49.2: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:22.74 -08:15:05.8: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:44:55.91 -08:41:12.5: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:33:10.99 -10:41:32.5: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:16.42 -10:46:31.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:22.74 -08:15:05.8: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8380 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:16.42 -10:46:31.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:37:33.71 -06:24:33.7: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:39.73 -11:51:49.2: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:33.71 -06:24:33.7: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7727 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:33:10.99 -10:41:32.5: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:44:55.91 -08:41:12.5: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:39.73 -11:51:49.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8493 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:55.91 -08:41:12.5: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0033 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:10.99 -10:41:32.5: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1229 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:57.62 -13:47:23.0: 15.07 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:57.62 -13:47:23.0: 14.93 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:52:36.15 -13:34:25.2: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:57.62 -13:47:23.0: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3132 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:26:39.48 -07:53:34.0: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:58:27.26 -11:12:41.6: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:56:45.41 -13:42:40.7: 14.79 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:01:24.61 -13:21:23.2: 14.93 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:52:36.15 -13:34:25.2: 15.10 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:36.15 -13:34:25.2: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3211 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:58:27.26 -11:12:41.6: 14.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:26:39.48 -07:53:34.0: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:27.26 -11:12:41.6: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2986 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:56:45.41 -13:42:40.7: 14.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:01:24.61 -13:21:23.2: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:39.48 -07:53:34.0: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2428 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:24.61 -13:21:23.2: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=14.2462 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:45.41 -13:42:40.7: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2854 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:56:10.81 -09:13:33.6: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:31:34.23 -09:15:38.1: 14.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:56:10.81 -09:13:33.6: 14.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:10.81 -09:13:33.6: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3774 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:57:57.06 -07:34:22.2: 15.21 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:33:10.50 -10:41:52.7: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:46:48.69 -13:58:23.5: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:58:31.03 -14:04:26.0: 14.78 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:31:34.23 -09:15:38.1: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:34.23 -09:15:38.1: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3534 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:57:57.06 -07:34:22.2: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:57.06 -07:34:22.2: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4813 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:33:10.50 -10:41:52.7: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:46:48.69 -13:58:23.5: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:10.50 -10:41:52.7: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3189 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:58:31.03 -14:04:26.0: 14.64 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:48.69 -13:58:23.5: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4866 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:31.03 -14:04:26.0: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3637 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:28.78 -06:03:19.9: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:28.78 -06:03:19.9: 14.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:28.78 -06:03:19.9: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4179 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:50:03.03 -13:02:39.4: 14.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:49.75 -13:07:13.9: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:59:46.27 -10:45:35.0: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:01:53.02 -12:04:24.8: 14.86 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:59:40.16 -12:50:39.8: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:50:03.03 -13:02:39.4: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:59:46.27 -10:45:35.0: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:49.75 -13:07:13.9: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:46.27 -10:45:35.0: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4838 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:03.03 -13:02:39.4: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5741 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:01:53.02 -12:04:24.8: 14.76 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:49.75 -13:07:13.9: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5027 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:53.02 -12:04:24.8: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5802 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:59:40.16 -12:50:39.8: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:40.16 -12:50:39.8: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4130 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:41:55.82 -14:08:36.3: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:41:55.82 -14:08:36.3: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:55.82 -14:08:36.3: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4633 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:40.78 -10:35:04.5: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:52:53.74 -06:01:26.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:51:27.49 -13:53:58.7: 14.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:57.64 -10:25:42.1: 15.24 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:57.14 -12:45:39.8: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:52:53.74 -06:01:26.5: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:40.78 -10:35:04.5: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:57.64 -10:25:42.1: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:51:27.49 -13:53:58.7: 14.73 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:40.78 -10:35:04.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5302 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:57.64 -10:25:42.1: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6454 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:27.49 -13:53:58.7: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5193 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:57.14 -12:45:39.8: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:57.14 -12:45:39.8: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5658 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:22.06 -08:22:42.8: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:22.06 -08:22:42.8: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:22.06 -08:22:42.8: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5946 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:30.85 -09:09:47.4: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:29:59.79 -11:20:52.2: 15.11 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:05.90 -12:36:24.9: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:17.39 -07:40:37.5: 15.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:29:59.79 -11:20:52.2: 15.56 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:30.85 -09:09:47.4: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:59.79 -11:20:52.2: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5362 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:05.90 -12:36:24.9: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:17.39 -07:40:37.5: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:30.85 -09:09:47.4: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5438 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:05.90 -12:36:24.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6489 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:17.39 -07:40:37.5: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7087 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:29.05 -13:46:10.0: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:29.05 -13:46:10.0: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:29.05 -13:46:10.0: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6727 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:47:48.40 -13:09:00.8: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:21.99 -11:52:02.0: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:47:48.40 -13:09:00.8: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:48.40 -13:09:00.8: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5362 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:21.99 -11:52:02.0: 15.45 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:21.99 -11:52:02.0: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7402 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111973.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112326.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112550.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112916.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113201.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111580_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111580_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111596_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111596_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111608_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111608_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111609_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111609_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111612_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111612_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111615_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111615_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111616_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111616_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111618_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111618_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111624_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111624_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111628_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111628_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111630_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111630_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111631_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111631_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111632_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111632_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111638_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111638_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111640_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111640_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111641_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111641_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111644_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111644_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111648_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111648_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111649_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111649_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111650_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111650_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111654_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111654_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111656_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111656_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111658_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111658_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111659_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111659_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111660_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111660_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111662_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111662_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111663_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111663_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111664_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111664_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111667_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111667_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111668_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111668_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111669_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111669_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111679_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111679_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111680_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111680_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111681_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111681_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111683_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111683_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111686_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111686_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111689_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111689_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111690_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111690_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111691_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111691_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111870_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 111870_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:40.66 -08:56:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111973_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 111973_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112228_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112228_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:53.98 -07:43:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112308_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112308_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112326_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 112326_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112485_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112485_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:26.81 -06:23:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112493_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112493_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112496_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112496_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112505_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112505_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112550_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 112550_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112608_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112608_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112630_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112630_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:40.83 -09:18:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112663_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112663_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112700_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112700_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112744_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112744_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112775_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112775_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112808_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112808_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112882_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112882_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112916_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 112916_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112943_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112943_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112954_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112954_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112985_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112985_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112994_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 112994_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113026_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113026_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113029_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113029_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113080_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113080_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113094_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113094_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113096_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113096_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113102_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113102_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113130_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113130_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113136_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113136_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113145_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113145_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113147_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113147_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:48.95 -09:31:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113149_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113149_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113165_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113165_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113168_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113168_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113180_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113180_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113183_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113183_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113189_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113189_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113190_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113190_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113201_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 113201_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113222_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113222_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113237_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113237_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113250_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113250_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113273_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113273_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113283_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113283_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113293_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113293_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113295_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113295_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113310_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113310_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113320_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113320_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113324_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113324_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113330_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 113330_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.64 -07:32:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-01_00-29-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks