######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Gem-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Gem-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Gem-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 746160 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 746160 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits_preview.png'
Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits

renamed 'Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits_preview.png'
Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 630.2893
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 835.9389
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5301.3354
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1222.2169
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5274.2627
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1218.0739
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 8.41096
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 17.5100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 17.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T03:03:21.9220904' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T08:03:21.9220904' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61311.3356703934 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T08:03:31.8264719' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61311.3357850229 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 106.66622312772 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 13.9999888452142 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.1197222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.1072222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.78193115747971 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '07 06 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20687 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20687 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.5100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.5100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 75.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 109.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.400032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/d_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits :)
Spent 0.538644 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/d_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 17.5799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 17.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T03:04:00.3237392' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T08:04:00.3237392' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61311.3361148494 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T08:04:10.2268840' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61311.3362294678 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 106.666223080049 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 13.9999888560427 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.2508333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.1911111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.75110171940727 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '07 06 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20687 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20687 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.5799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.5799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 75.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 109.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.400032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/d_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits :)
Spent 0.545215 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/d_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits

fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.83578613
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.1'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:49.165 +14:00:11.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:49.165 +14:00:11.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0296 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Image size: 941.1'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:49.532 +14:00:29.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:49.532 +14:00:29.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0309 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:49.165 +14:00:11.32
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:49.532 +14:00:29.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00520 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5iWECCyoO9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wAaDhGj7QZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3yFEwhqjJZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A9dhR1mt5i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.899900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.899900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec +8.5626 to +19.2813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec 8.5626 to 19.2813 deg
Loaded 18669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13893 out of 14989 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14989 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.5iWECCyoO9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, bad_region=5272, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 20681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5273)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1616 n_q2=831 n_q3=1614 n_q4=730 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wAaDhGj7QZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, bad_region=6781, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 16979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5273)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4792 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=1243 n_q2=1063 n_q3=1368 n_q4=1118 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3yFEwhqjJZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=615, bad_region=1064, passed=7110
Got 7110 stars (including 5501 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7110 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=6.595 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.196 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.128 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.721 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.952 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.952 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.538 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.816 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.816 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4775 robust_rms_before=1.421 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.553 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.538 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.938 worst_region_rms_after=0.816 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.500 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.816
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.4'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:49.217 +14:00:10.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7110 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1243456.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.421 -> 0.538 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4775 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4562 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4562 pairs (4775 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4562 robust_rms=6.445 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.890 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.890 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4562 robust_rms=0.708 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.893 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.893 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4562 robust_rms=0.527 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.765 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.765 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4562 robust_rms_before=0.527 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.527 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.527 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.765 worst_region_rms_after=0.765 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.765 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.765
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.4'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:49.217 +14:00:10.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7110 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1243650.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.527 -> 0.527 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4562 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4562 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4562 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=1631 n_q2=676 n_q3=1611 n_q4=644 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.A9dhR1mt5i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=656, bad_region=1092, passed=7100
Got 7100 stars (including 5424 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=6.552 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.296 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.296 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=0.680 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.943 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.943 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=0.521 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.762 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.762 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4778 robust_rms_before=1.385 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.549 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.521 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.892 worst_region_rms_after=0.762 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.470 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.762
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Image size: 941.1'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:49.577 +14:00:28.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7100 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1243466.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.385 -> 0.521 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4778 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4571 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4571 pairs (4778 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4571 robust_rms=6.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.313 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.313 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4571 robust_rms=0.666 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.897 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.897 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4571 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.717 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.717 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4571 robust_rms_before=0.516 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.516 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.516 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.716 worst_region_rms_after=0.717 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.716 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.717
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.717 vs 0.716 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4571 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4571 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=4571 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=1617 n_q2=693 n_q3=1611 n_q4=650 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.481 worst_q_ratio=1.171
ref2=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.514 worst_q_ratio=1.169
new1=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.550 worst_q_ratio=1.126
new2=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits sigma_overall=0.551 worst_q_ratio=1.142
reference average sigma_overall=0.4975 worst_q_ratio=1.17
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (4791 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (4792 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4562 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379_astrometric_residuals.png (4571 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.4'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:49.217 +14:00:10.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:49.217 +14:00:10.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0298 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Image size: 941.1'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:49.577 +14:00:28.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:49.577 +14:00:28.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:49.217 +14:00:10.08
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:49.577 +14:00:28.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00519 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3ZDlIDjLNo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5g8aeZ7wa0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2gvwcYByGB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YOix44yZj3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.735100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.735100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec +8.5565 to +19.2859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec 8.5565 to 19.2859 deg
Loaded 18692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11904 out of 16168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16168 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 79 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3ZDlIDjLNo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=42, blended=33805, bad_region=29686, passed=208495
Got 208495 stars (including 147891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1556 n_q2=875 n_q3=1578 n_q4=769 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5g8aeZ7wa0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=23358, bad_region=33384, passed=173985
Got 173985 stars (including 122046 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173985 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.586 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1027 n_q3=1377 n_q4=1097 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2gvwcYByGB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=3448, bad_region=6686, passed=64563
Got 64563 stars (including 54579 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64563 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=6.559 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.999 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.999 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.713 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.977 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.977 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.536 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.809 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.809 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4777 robust_rms_before=0.533 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.529 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.536 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.826 worst_region_rms_after=0.809 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.826 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.809
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.826 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.826 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.529 arcsec matched=4777
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.495 n_q1=1759 n_q2=746 n_q3=1571 n_q4=701 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YOix44yZj3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3670, bad_region=6837, passed=66439
Got 66439 stars (including 56120 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66439 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5254)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=6.432 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.485 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.485 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.672 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.945 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.945 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.522 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.742 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.742 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=0.518 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.536 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.522 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.738 worst_region_rms_after=0.742 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.738 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.742
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.738 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.738 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.518 arcsec matched=4773
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=4773 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.490 n_q1=1741 n_q2=754 n_q3=1578 n_q4=700 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Another copy of lib/update_offline_catalogs.sh is updating the catalogs right now - not downloading anything in this run
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:11.28 +13:22:36.6: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:56:41.68 +14:27:24.1: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:01:56.65 +14:24:06.4: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:26.17 +14:20:38.9: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:23:03.83 +16:54:56.5: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:20.40 +12:12:31.7: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:26.17 +14:20:38.9: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:23:03.83 +16:54:56.5: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:01:56.65 +14:24:06.4: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:11.28 +13:22:36.6: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:56:41.68 +14:27:24.1: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:26.17 +14:20:38.9: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2057 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:03.83 +16:54:56.5: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9258 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:56.65 +14:24:06.4: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2129 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:11.28 +13:22:36.6: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1477 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:41.68 +14:27:24.1: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1434 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:20.40 +12:12:31.7: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:20.40 +12:12:31.7: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9673 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:37.65 +10:36:41.1: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:02.99 +16:23:44.4: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:49.17 +11:09:12.5: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:23:44.20 +16:43:42.5: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:42:26.75 +11:58:06.5: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:37.65 +10:36:41.1: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:02.99 +16:23:44.4: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:37.65 +10:36:41.1: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5467 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:02.99 +16:23:44.4: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4637 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:49.17 +11:09:12.5: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:42:26.75 +11:58:06.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:49.17 +11:09:12.5: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0945 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:23:44.20 +16:43:42.5: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:26.75 +11:58:06.5: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9482 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:44.20 +16:43:42.5: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8633 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:41:13.71 +11:02:14.7: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:24:09.23 +16:02:05.7: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:57:10.44 +11:00:11.2: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:58.17 +12:03:37.2: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:41:13.71 +11:02:14.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:13.71 +11:02:14.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7244 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:24:09.23 +16:02:05.7: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:09.23 +16:02:05.7: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7510 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:15:15.80 +15:08:38.2: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:57:10.44 +11:00:11.2: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:10.44 +11:00:11.2: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8895 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:58.17 +12:03:37.2: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:58.17 +12:03:37.2: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1600 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:15:15.80 +15:08:38.2: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:15.80 +15:08:38.2: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3310 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248973_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 248973_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.51 | 06:58:22.53 +12:46:21.3 | 3531 2477 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:58:22.50 +12:46:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248974_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 248974_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.60 | 07:17:01.42 +13:45:28.6 | 6279 3025 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:17:01.44 +13:45:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248981_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 248981_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 13.28 | 07:01:56.69 +14:24:06.1 | 4083 3451 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.16 | 07:01:56.60 +14:24:06.7 | 4082 3448 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248983_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 248983_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 13.28 | 06:56:41.68 +14:27:23.6 | 3316 3505 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.06 | 06:56:41.68 +14:27:24.6 | 3315 3502 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248990_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 248990_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.09 | 06:43:04.77 +13:39:58.8 | 1291 3098 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:43:04.78 +13:39:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248991_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 248991_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.09 | 07:07:05.16 +13:19:51.8 | 4818 2786 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:07:05.17 +13:19:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248992_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 248992_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.25 | 07:07:58.11 +10:57:03.7 | 4919 1345 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:07:58.16 +10:57:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248995_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 248995_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 13.09 | 06:49:26.33 +14:20:39.8 | 2250 3473 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.43 | 06:49:26.01 +14:20:38.0 | 2248 3470 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248996_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 248996_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 13.07 | 06:51:11.32 +13:22:36.2 | 2485 2878 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.25 | 06:51:11.24 +13:22:37.0 | 2484 2875 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248999_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 248999_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 12.92 | 07:23:03.86 +16:54:55.1 | 7176 4937 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.93 | 07:23:03.81 +16:54:58.0 | 7175 4935 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249000_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249000_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.97 | 07:01:01.94 +11:00:47.5 | 3892 1403 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:01:01.92 +11:00:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249001_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249001_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.79 | 07:19:05.76 +13:23:36.8 | 6581 2803 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:19:05.74 +13:23:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249004_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249004_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.88 | 07:09:50.98 +14:02:30.2 | 5231 3208 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:09:50.95 +14:02:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249008_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249008_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 12.98 | 06:49:20.35 +12:12:31.5 | 2184 2180 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.95 | 06:49:20.45 +12:12:32.0 | 2183 2177 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249014_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249014_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.10 | 06:52:49.65 +11:45:23.1 | 2690 1886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:52:49.78 +11:45:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249017_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249017_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.67 | 06:59:22.56 +17:59:28.6 | 3768 5630 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:59:22.54 +17:59:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249019_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249019_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.74 | 07:03:05.09 +14:59:51.0 | 4257 3804 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:03:05.06 +14:59:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249023_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249023_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.71 | 07:11:21.21 +15:19:09.6 | 5464 3976 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:11:21.25 +15:19:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249026_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249026_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.82 | 06:53:05.95 +14:31:32.7 | 2790 3560 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:53:05.83 +14:31:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249033_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249033_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 12.58 | 06:51:37.67 +10:36:41.1 | 2486 1200 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.52 | 06:51:37.64 +10:36:41.2 | 2485 1196 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249034_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249034_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.65 | 06:43:09.54 +12:21:58.3 | 1266 2307 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:43:09.53 +12:21:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249035_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249035_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 12.44 | 07:25:02.97 +16:23:44.4 | 7464 4623 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.49 | 07:25:03.00 +16:23:44.4 | 7463 4620 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249040_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249040_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.42 | 06:47:47.45 +15:10:56.8 | 2027 3987 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:47:47.42 +15:10:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249042_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249042_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.47 | 07:02:44.92 +13:06:41.5 | 4179 2666 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:02:44.95 +13:06:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249044_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249044_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 11.92 | 07:02:08.63 +10:45:43.3 | 4053 1247 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249045_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249045_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 12.18 | 06:49:49.17 +11:09:13.5 | 2229 1537 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.05 | 06:49:49.16 +11:09:11.5 | 2228 1534 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249050_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249050_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 11.85 | 07:23:44.27 +16:43:42.4 | 7273 4824 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 11.88 | 07:23:44.12 +16:43:42.6 | 7272 4821 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249051_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249051_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 11.97 | 06:42:26.73 +11:58:06.3 | 1149 2073 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 11.93 | 06:42:26.77 +11:58:06.7 | 1148 2069 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249052_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249052_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.08 | 07:01:44.90 +12:20:24.9 | 4020 2204 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249058_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249058_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 10.38 | 07:24:07.77 +11:56:42.2 | 7319 1924 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249059_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249059_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 10.56 | 07:00:34.25 +14:02:27.1 | 3875 3235 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249060_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249060_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 10.97 | 07:22:47.60 +11:19:15.7 | 7119 1546 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249063_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249063_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 11.02 | 06:41:53.42 +16:43:23.4 | 1201 4964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249064_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249064_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 10.97 | 07:13:09.77 +16:09:34.0 | 5734 4481 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:13:09.77 +16:09:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249066_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249066_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 11.28 | 07:16:40.76 +16:09:07.2 | 6244 4472 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:16:40.74 +16:09:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249068_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249068_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 11.47 | 06:40:49.52 +09:53:23.2 | 0841 0810 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:40:49.51 +09:53:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249072_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249072_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 11.54 | 06:43:56.22 +13:15:36.7 | 1407 2845 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:43:56.22 +13:15:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249074_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249074_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 11.62 | 07:13:25.68 +16:11:54.3 | 5773 4504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:13:25.66 +16:11:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249076_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249076_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 11.82 | 06:41:28.42 +15:04:29.6 | 1093 3964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249078_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249078_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 11.96 | 06:51:17.30 +10:38:37.5 | 2435 1218 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:51:17.35 +10:38:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249080_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249080_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.05 | 06:41:19.03 +16:24:56.5 | 1108 4781 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:41:19.07 +16:24:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249082_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249082_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.16 | 06:40:59.48 +09:55:18.4 | 0867 0829 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:40:59.42 +09:55:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249084_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249084_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 11.98 | 07:17:14.01 +13:51:24.9 | 6310 3085 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:17:14.03 +13:51:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249089_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249089_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.45 | 06:41:04.55 +09:51:51.3 | 0878 0793 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:41:04.52 +09:51:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249090_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249090_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.35 | 07:01:48.03 +17:59:34.9 | 4117 5622 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:01:48.04 +17:59:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249092_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249092_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.23 | 07:02:43.19 +15:59:49.3 | 4219 4409 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:02:43.16 +15:59:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249096_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249096_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.43 | 07:00:08.05 +16:04:47.4 | 3845 4468 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:00:08.02 +16:04:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249099_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249099_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.48 | 07:00:40.61 +16:56:21.5 | 3938 4986 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:00:40.68 +16:56:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249102_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249102_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.62 | 07:03:50.02 +12:33:43.1 | 4330 2331 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:03:50.03 +12:33:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249107_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249107_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 12.72 | 06:41:13.71 +11:02:14.8 | 0938 1512 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.73 | 06:41:13.71 +11:02:14.5 | 0937 1509 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249110_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249110_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.45 | 06:39:39.95 +11:20:04.1 | 0711 1700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249111_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249111_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.65 | 07:20:13.07 +15:07:54.0 | 6753 3853 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:20:13.10 +15:07:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249112_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249112_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.66 | 06:53:14.53 +10:36:52.2 | 2726 1191 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:53:14.55 +10:36:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249113_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249113_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.71 | 07:16:38.57 +16:09:36.7 | 6239 4477 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:16:38.54 +16:09:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249115_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249115_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.68 | 07:14:29.12 +12:08:46.4 | 5894 2055 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:14:29.13 +12:08:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249117_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249117_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 12.71 | 07:24:09.20 +16:02:05.5 | 7332 4403 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.79 | 07:24:09.25 +16:02:05.9 | 7331 4401 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249118_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249118_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.76 | 07:02:16.56 +15:18:31.6 | 4144 3994 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:02:16.58 +15:18:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249126_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249126_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.93 | 07:08:50.83 +16:55:29.7 | 5118 4952 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:08:50.80 +16:55:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249128_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249128_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.69 | 07:20:07.42 +16:09:38.0 | 6745 4476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:20:07.42 +16:09:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249131_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249131_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 12.94 | 06:57:10.53 +11:00:09.5 | 3321 1414 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.86 | 06:57:10.35 +11:00:12.8 | 3319 1412 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249132_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249132_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.93 | 07:05:09.33 +14:14:04.1 | 4548 3337 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:05:09.34 +14:14:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249134_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249134_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.17 | 07:13:55.46 +13:57:41.3 | 5826 3152 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:13:55.56 +13:57:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249137_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249137_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.99 | 07:04:56.98 +14:13:57.7 | 4518 3336 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:04:57.04 +14:13:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249150_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249150_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 13.14 | 06:51:58.20 +12:03:37.4 | 2570 2077 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.17 | 06:51:58.15 +12:03:36.9 | 2569 2074 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249153_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249153_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.11 | 07:07:19.52 +15:47:41.3 | 4884 4272 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:07:19.55 +15:47:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249155_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249155_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.08 | 06:45:51.59 +12:40:31.2 | 1677 2479 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249156_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249156_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.22 | 07:01:28.19 +15:40:18.9 | 4033 4217 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:01:28.30 +15:40:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249158_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249158_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.39 | 06:59:05.33 +10:04:32.0 | 3587 0841 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249161_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249161_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.33579 | 2461311.83579 | 13.21 | 07:15:15.82 +15:08:38.0 | 6032 3867 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-03-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.51 | 07:15:15.78 +15:08:38.3 | 6031 3864 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249162_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249162_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.21 | 07:03:45.89 +10:57:41.2 | 4296 1363 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:03:45.88 +10:57:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249163_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249163_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.29 | 06:41:59.47 +11:22:08.1 | 1062 1707 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249166_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249166_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.07 | 07:08:31.36 +10:56:42.6 | 5001 1340 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:08:31.43 +10:56:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249173_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249173_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.79 | 07:15:06.08 +11:00:47.3 | 5976 1368 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:15:06.08 +11:00:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249175_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 249175_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 13.50 | 07:17:16.25 +13:51:15.3 | 6315 3083 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:17:16.24 +13:51:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.24 | 07:04:57.48 +13:56:46.4 | 4515 3163 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:04:57.51 +13:56:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89197_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 89197_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.20 | 06:45:55.78 +12:58:33.9 | 1696 2661 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:45:55.84 +12:58:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 11.89 | 06:44:57.28 +09:50:48.6 | 1464 0762 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 06:44:57.26 +09:50:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173191_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 173191_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 12.88 | 06:52:31.34 +17:51:55.1 | 2777 5588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 28.33623 | 2461311.83623 | 8.16 | 07:08:42.60 +10:01:26.8 | 5018 0781 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053035_TTUQ2b1x1_1203337_altSvNl2/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_03-04-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits |
**** FOUND 07:08:42.62 +10:01:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Gem-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.83578613 -observatory V36
13:36:59.82 -11:37:23.6 Mercury (-0.1mag)
14:11:45.31 -20:29:14.5 Venus (-4.8mag)
08:08:34.33 +21:08:49.3 Mars (1.1mag)
09:25:24.69 +15:46:08.4 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:46:12.34 +02:01:03.9 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:09.72 +21:00:41.5 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:11:39.21 -00:17:08.1 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:28.86 -23:42:58.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
01:29:00.60 +13:40:22.7 Moon (-12.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 28 05:32 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.83578613:
09:25:31.36 +15:45:33.7 Io (9.4mag)
09:25:25.32 +15:46:06.8 Europa (6.3mag)
09:25:39.11 +15:44:51.7 Ganymede (7.9mag)
09:25:35.96 +15:45:10.2 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:24:14.19 +16:08:06.2 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:25:27.00 +15:45:57.4 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:23:26.90 +16:04:13.5 Elara (17.6mag)
09:28:33.85 +15:09:19.7 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:24:57.62 +16:09:45.7 Carme (18.9mag)
00:46:01.08 +02:00:46.3 Titan (8.2mag)
00:46:12.38 +02:01:05.7 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:45:35.65 +01:59:45.3 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:46:26.05 +02:00:29.3 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:44:40.03 +01:49:14.3 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 28 05:33 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.83578613:
01:08:21.90 +18:35:04.0 JWST
17:27:01.26 +36:07:31.7 Chandra
06:39:21.78 +10:30:53.3 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 28 05:32 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.83578613 -observatory V36
03:47:34.23 +20:02:37.9 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:14:13.89 -33:47:28.6 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:33:28.33 -71:33:25.3 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:43.27 +34:16:26.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:06:15.99 +47:48:56.0 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
21:58:22.84 +25:50:25.9 17.6mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:24:02.74 +25:37:15.2 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
11:08:32.68 +26:35:30.5 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
10:01:25.78 +05:07:11.6 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:12.59 -17:28:37.3 15.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:54:34.06 +34:25:25.0 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:10:50.35 +15:07:56.1 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:25:59.34 +42:09:56.1 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:01:19.51 +47:36:33.3 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:44:05.78 -13:22:58.1 14.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
11:53:25.49 +17:04:23.1 16.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:38:14.28 -01:37:27.4 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:50:23.03 +69:34:22.1 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:50:00.47 +44:50:46.1 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:33:07.62 +13:02:20.1 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:44:42.60 -34:05:24.4 14.0mag 10P/Tempel
01:51:53.08 +39:37:56.5 17.1mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:02:24.77 -07:06:22.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:50:55.29 -11:34:19.9 17.9mag 63P/Wild
07:16:38.69 +17:22:17.2 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:10:57.47 +14:50:21.6 16.9mag 88P/Howell
06:51:23.21 +36:12:46.4 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:30:26.77 +18:37:56.4 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:13:44.69 +16:14:15.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:34:45.56 -28:18:56.2 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos
06:40:06.98 +19:52:00.1 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:56:25.80 -08:55:50.1 13.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:47:55.75 +05:02:18.0 13.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:33:07.30 +06:15:18.0 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:39:30.45 +42:10:57.7 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
09:42:19.21 +32:29:49.0 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Sep 28 05:32 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 28 05:32 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Sep 28 05:32 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
21:20:34.008 -69:26:22.42 AT 2026aayq 2026-09-08.14 19.278
23:31:25.083 +50:11:28.08 AT 2026aayp 2026-09-08.03 18.91
15:33:30.416 +55:53:51.32 AT 2026aayo 2026-09-07.86 19.147
01:26:46.581 -53:40:22.70 AT 2026aayn 2026-09-08.18 18.623
23:20:37.556 -72:55:19.50 AT 2026aaym 2026-09-08.26 19.286
01:34:19.085 -73:36:50.07 AT 2026aayl 2026-09-08.24 18.806
20:58:26.639 -11:47:36.65 AT 2026aayk 2026-09-07.88 19.055
05:39:08.544 -26:08:36.47 AT 2026aayj 2026-09-08.77 19.74
04:04:28.836 -41:00:50.05 AT 2026aayi 2026-09-08.68 19.15
00:14:57.069 -42:30:24.15 AT 2026aayh 2026-09-08.56 19.71
21:17:59.994 -44:20:12.59 AT 2026aayg 2026-09-08.49 19.61
05:02:23.770 -53:02:16.78 AT 2026aayf 2026-09-08.79 19.88
00:20:27.819 -47:45:21.71 AT 2026aaye 2026-09-06.60 20.33
20:09:14.246 -31:36:02.01 AT 2026aayd 2026-09-01.43 20.28
20:55:12.341 -52:51:47.51 AT 2026aayc 2026-09-08.14 19.299
20:19:25.725 -32:15:17.38 AT 2026aayb 2026-08-20.52 19.12
23:05:53.383 -45:39:19.79 AT 2026aaya 2026-09-04.58 20.06
00:14:31.763 -49:54:27.22 AT 2026aaxz 2026-09-04.61 20.03
01:12:19.993 -37:57:49.91 AT 2026aaxy 2026-09-04.62 20.15
22:04:50.285 -46:53:46.94 AT 2026aaxx 2026-09-06.57 19.67
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 28 05:32 tns_transients_list.txt