This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3693 2461311.8693 8.79 07:05:24.90 +23:10:34.7
193.44406 13.25727 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 0 -0 0 8.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:24.90 +23:10:34.7: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:24.90 +23:10:34.7: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8693,8.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3693 8.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3693 2461311.8693 11.84 06:50:51.92 +26:13:01.8
189.21122 11.50464 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope -0 0 0 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:50:51.92 +26:13:01.8: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:50:51.92 +26:13:01.8: 15.57 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8693,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3693 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3693 2461311.8693 13.96 07:14:12.80 +20:40:58.5
196.64369 14.10260 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.322 Phaeo -0 1 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:12.80 +20:40:58.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:12.80 +20:40:58.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8693,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3693 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3693 2461311.8693 13.73 07:29:55.85 +17:35:31.6
201.13255 16.23847 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo -1 0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:55.85 +17:35:31.6: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:55.85 +17:35:31.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8693,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3693 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3693 2461311.8693 13.86 07:46:09.03 +23:50:22.1
196.56070 22.13531 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.579 Sidonia -0 2 2 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:46:09.03 +23:50:22.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:46:09.03 +23:50:22.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8693,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3693 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3693 2461311.8693 12.02 07:50:20.63 +22:14:38.2
198.54534 22.45860 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania -1 0 1 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:50:20.63 +22:14:38.2: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:50:20.63 +22:14:38.2: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8693,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3693 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461311.86966285 28.09.2026 08:52:08.870 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22112
Objects passed selection criteria: 22007
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16240.8
Average stars matched: 15844.5 (97.5601 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246724 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 28 03:54:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461311.86966285 28.09.2026 08:52:08.870 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 183
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.11
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 140269
Objects passed selection criteria: 139861
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 109564
Average stars matched: 105612 (96.3939 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 605160 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 28 03:56:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.86898593
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:09.685 +22:02:05.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:09.685 +22:02:05.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0416 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:06.991 +22:02:21.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:06.991 +22:02:21.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0414 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:09.685 +22:02:05.20
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:06.991 +22:02:21.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01138 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LmQCMIDkNG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vhx0MbD44r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NNxrRgUtm2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wRpcV0lA1b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.LmQCMIDkNG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=1, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=904 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Vhx0MbD44r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=1, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 21095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=895 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1061 n_q4=1499 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NNxrRgUtm2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=722, bad_region=0, passed=9167
Got 9167 stars (including 8437 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4810 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4810 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5291)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4811 robust_rms=12.161 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.529 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.529 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4811 robust_rms=0.559 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.955 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.955 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4811 robust_rms=0.349 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.445 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.445 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4811 robust_rms_before=0.938 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.349 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.449 worst_region_rms_after=0.445 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.035 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.445
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.449 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.449 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.335 arcsec matched=4811
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1531 n_q2=994 n_q3=1396 n_q4=890 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wRpcV0lA1b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=735, bad_region=0, passed=9166
Got 9166 stars (including 8416 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9166 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5300)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=11.651 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.276 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.276 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=0.565 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.859 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.859 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4819 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.446 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.446 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4819 robust_rms_before=0.942 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.346 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.374 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.470 worst_region_rms_after=0.446 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.043 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.446
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.470 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.470 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.346 arcsec matched=4819
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1524 n_q2=1006 n_q3=1392 n_q4=897 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.183
ref2=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.084
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits sigma_overall=0.340 worst_q_ratio=1.095
reference average sigma_overall=0.4065 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4811 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370_astrometric_residuals.png (4811 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371_astrometric_residuals.png (4819 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:50.64 +20:58:42.8: 10.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.81 +22:47:45.0: 10.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.38 +23:01:31.4: 11.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.2: 10.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:24.90 +23:10:34.7: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.37 +22:51:40.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.38 +23:01:31.4: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.81 +22:47:45.0: 10.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.2: 10.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.37 +22:51:40.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.37 +22:51:40.0: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:50.64 +20:58:42.8: 10.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:24.90 +23:10:34.7: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.77 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.38 +23:01:31.4: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2354 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.81 +22:47:45.0: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.0984 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.2: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.5788 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:50.64 +20:58:42.8: ref_mag=10.77 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0157 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31362.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31362_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
Preparing report for the candidate 31362_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31363_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 31363_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.08 +25:59:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31371_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 31371_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31422_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 31422_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31464_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 31464_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31465_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 31465_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.03 +20:02:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 31469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 31488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31517_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 31517_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.39 +24:13:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:05:24.90 +23:10:34.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:09.685 +22:02:05.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:09.685 +22:02:05.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0416 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:06.991 +22:02:21.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:06.991 +22:02:21.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0414 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:09.685 +22:02:05.20
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:06.991 +22:02:21.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01138 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9jJbly6Mcb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zEWKAcck4M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HQ6KLtOx8r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.csEgGCSx4P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.11
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 176 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.7 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9jJbly6Mcb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, bad_region=3, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=951 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zEWKAcck4M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=17785, bad_region=5, passed=153538
Got 153538 stars (including 135488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=940 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1093 n_q4=1447 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HQ6KLtOx8r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3322, bad_region=5, passed=67416
Got 67416 stars (including 63964 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67416 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5294)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=12.197 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.605 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.605 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.573 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.920 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.920 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.350 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.446 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.446 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4813 robust_rms_before=0.935 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.350 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.458 worst_region_rms_after=0.446 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.022 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.446
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.458 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.458 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.325 arcsec matched=4813
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits N_match=4813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=1507 n_q2=1015 n_q3=1376 n_q4=915 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.csEgGCSx4P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3376, bad_region=9, passed=68616
Got 68616 stars (including 65111 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68616 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5295)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=11.836 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.721 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.721 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.565 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.861 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.861 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.441 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4813 robust_rms_before=0.931 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.373 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.470 worst_region_rms_after=0.441 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.034 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.441
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.470 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.470 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.328 arcsec matched=4813
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits N_match=4813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1499 n_q2=1020 n_q3=1370 n_q4=924 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.055
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-51-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0370.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_035313_TTUQ1b1x1_2233392_YQFQ07vt/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Another copy of lib/update_offline_catalogs.sh is updating the catalogs right now - not downloading anything in this run
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:06.29 +24:26:57.6: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:12.07 +17:44:20.9: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:48.82 +21:43:42.0: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.95 +20:54:37.3: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:06.29 +24:26:57.6: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:03:12.07 +17:44:20.9: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:06.29 +24:26:57.6: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5728 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:12.07 +17:44:20.9: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0666 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:48.82 +21:43:42.0: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:48.82 +21:43:42.0: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4471 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.95 +20:54:37.3: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.95 +20:54:37.3: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3585 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:16.91 +20:35:57.7: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.29 +19:41:48.9: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:29.97 +27:10:51.5: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:55:57.43 +19:36:11.3: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:16.91 +20:35:57.7: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:16.91 +20:35:57.7: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9640 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:02.56 +19:22:28.2: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.29 +19:41:48.9: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.29 +19:41:48.9: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6219 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:29.97 +27:10:51.5: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:55:57.43 +19:36:11.3: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:29.97 +27:10:51.5: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8225 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:57.43 +19:36:11.3: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6979 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:50:51.92 +26:13:01.8: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:02:02.56 +19:22:28.2: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:02.56 +19:22:28.2: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4880 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.85 +22:54:53.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:50:51.92 +26:13:01.8: 15.57 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:50:51.92 +26:13:01.8: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=11.8428 delta=3.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.85 +22:54:53.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.85 +22:54:53.4: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:57.51 +22:31:30.5: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.86 +22:50:51.0: 10.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.10 +19:24:26.5: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:57.51 +22:31:30.5: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:57.51 +22:31:30.5: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4561 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.86 +22:50:51.0: 10.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.86 +22:50:51.0: ref_mag=10.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.5725 delta=-1.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.10 +19:24:26.5: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.10 +19:24:26.5: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5290 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:58:32.25 +18:05:24.6: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:54:23.11 +21:10:54.4: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:58:32.25 +18:05:24.6: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:32.25 +18:05:24.6: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9985 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:52:47.59 +20:22:25.7: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:54:23.11 +21:10:54.4: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:23.11 +21:10:54.4: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0631 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:37.33 +21:43:08.4: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:20.38 +24:26:16.6: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:49:50.27 +20:58:51.4: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:52:47.59 +20:22:25.7: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:47.59 +20:22:25.7: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1657 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:37.33 +21:43:08.4: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:37.33 +21:43:08.4: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0914 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:20.38 +24:26:16.6: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:20.38 +24:26:16.6: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2649 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:49:50.27 +20:58:51.4: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:50.27 +20:58:51.4: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3437 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:11.49 +18:48:55.8: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:11.49 +18:48:55.8: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:17.63 +18:01:37.8: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:11.49 +18:48:55.8: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3996 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:29.73 +22:47:25.6: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:09:17.63 +18:01:37.8: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:17.63 +18:01:37.8: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4413 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:00.96 +20:13:26.2: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:34:29.73 +22:47:25.6: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:29.73 +22:47:25.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4724 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:00.96 +20:13:26.2: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:00.96 +20:13:26.2: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4620 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.60 +22:49:42.7: 12.84 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:26.79 +23:15:06.4: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.60 +22:49:42.7: 12.94 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:50.23 +23:11:20.7: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.60 +22:49:42.7: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.5559 delta=-0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:26.79 +23:15:06.4: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:26.79 +23:15:06.4: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5561 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:01.24 +21:35:26.1: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:12.80 +20:40:58.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:58:22.17 +22:15:10.6: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:46.04 +23:23:50.5: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:18:50.23 +23:11:20.7: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:50.23 +23:11:20.7: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7132 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:19:01.24 +21:35:26.1: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:01.24 +21:35:26.1: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6926 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:12.80 +20:40:58.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:09:46.04 +23:23:50.5: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:58:22.17 +22:15:10.6: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:22.17 +22:15:10.6: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8264 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:46.04 +23:23:50.5: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9754 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:00.68 +23:01:54.5: 13.04 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:55.85 +17:35:31.6: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:46:09.03 +23:50:22.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:00.68 +23:01:54.5: 12.98 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:00.68 +23:01:54.5: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.0478 delta=-1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:50.45 +22:57:55.2: 11.49 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:55.85 +17:35:31.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:43.37 +23:28:23.3: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:46:09.03 +23:50:22.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:50.45 +22:57:55.2: 11.53 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:50.45 +22:57:55.2: ref_mag=11.51 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=14.2611 delta=-2.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:16:43.37 +23:28:23.3: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:43.37 +23:28:23.3: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2116 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:50:20.63 +22:14:38.2: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:50:20.63 +22:14:38.2: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175725.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176859.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176888.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176901.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out63943.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175435_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175435_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.34 +21:13:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175440_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175440_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175453_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175453_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:50.85 +21:39:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175455_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175455_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:44.58 +20:07:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175456_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175456_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.34 +19:58:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175457_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175457_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:10.22 +23:16:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:51.75 +20:05:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175465_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175465_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:04.62 +23:09:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:04.89 +20:58:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:07.75 +18:14:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:30.85 +22:51:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:33.32 +17:36:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175478_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175478_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:41.07 +21:56:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175479_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175479_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.35 +19:59:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175483_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175483_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:14.92 +18:59:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:25.15 +24:28:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175487_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175487_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:05.32 +26:01:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.87 +26:11:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:51.37 +17:19:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:51.39 +18:23:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:09.16 +17:52:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:12.90 +20:54:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.76 +21:35:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175495_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175495_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:31.08 +20:09:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.54 +17:49:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.29 +27:06:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.50 +21:02:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175502_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175502_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.86 +20:04:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175503_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175503_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175504_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175504_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.10 +19:40:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.20 +19:25:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:19.27 +22:46:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175514_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175514_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:23.20 +22:16:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:27.82 +19:32:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175516_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175516_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:49.30 +26:56:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175523_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175523_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:24.89 +23:10:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175668_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175668_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.92 +22:56:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175695_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175695_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.59 +22:51:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175725_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
Preparing report for the candidate 175725_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175759_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175759_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:49.35 +19:28:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175772_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175772_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.67 +19:12:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175779_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175779_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.21 +24:07:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175796_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175796_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.16 +22:38:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175803_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175803_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.56 +22:52:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175878_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175878_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.38 +22:56:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175894_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175894_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.94 +19:13:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175926_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175926_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175937_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175937_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:37.77 +20:24:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175938_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175938_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:37.90 +19:42:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175941_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175941_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:10.69 +22:27:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175950_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175950_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:48.12 +17:59:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175974_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175974_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.95 +23:03:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175985_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175985_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175988_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175988_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.36 +26:03:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175989_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 175989_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176013_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176013_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:31.10 +20:04:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176017_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176017_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.45 +22:23:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176035_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176035_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:33.04 +22:42:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176039_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176039_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.90 +20:58:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176044_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176044_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.12 +23:37:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176050_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176050_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.86 +22:57:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176063_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176063_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.33 +25:56:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176065_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176065_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:19.04 +25:55:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176070_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176070_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.40 +18:39:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176072_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176072_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:37.07 +17:45:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176076_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176076_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:01.20 +26:51:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.90 +22:42:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176099_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176099_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.09 +18:03:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176117_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176117_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.45 +21:18:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176120_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176120_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.12 +22:10:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176132_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176132_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.79 +23:56:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176137_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176137_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:02.92 +23:25:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176146_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176146_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.80 +25:23:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176165_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176165_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.40 +26:22:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176168_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176168_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.57 +25:29:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176172_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176172_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:32.39 +18:09:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176189_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176189_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:42.72 +23:41:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176192_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176192_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.85 +23:26:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176195_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176195_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176217_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176217_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.34 +21:47:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176232_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176232_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.10 +22:43:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176237_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176237_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:19.30 +22:04:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176249_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176249_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.81 +18:51:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176264_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176264_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.14 +22:57:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176271_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176271_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:57.03 +26:00:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176276_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176276_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176292_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176292_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:46.05 +19:29:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176309_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176309_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.42 +20:30:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176316_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176316_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.88 +25:33:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176324_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176324_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:27.69 +22:58:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176338_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176338_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176368_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176368_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176391_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176391_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176410_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176410_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.15 +22:52:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176418_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176418_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:00.36 +20:48:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176422_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176422_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.39 +21:31:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176434_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176434_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.29 +24:32:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176440_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176440_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:56.03 +18:43:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:09.04 +23:28:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.46 +19:28:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.43 +18:07:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.62 +21:27:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.93 +18:19:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.42 +20:05:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176518_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176518_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:04.18 +18:36:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176519_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176519_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.01 +20:06:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176520_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176520_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.12 +22:50:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176523_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176523_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:36.65 +19:19:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176524_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176524_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.64 +26:19:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:11.85 +22:12:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176537_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176537_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.14 +22:57:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176539_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176539_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:23.52 +20:20:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176547_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176547_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.79 +22:49:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176548_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176548_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.42 +21:56:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176558_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176558_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176560_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176560_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.49 +24:54:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176563_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176563_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:39.47 +26:48:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176564_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176564_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.32 +23:05:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176571_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176571_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.48 +24:08:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176572_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176572_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.54 +20:26:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176580_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176580_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176583_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176583_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.01 +25:18:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176593_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176593_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:48.09 +21:45:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176604_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176604_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.67 +20:31:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176613_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176613_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:31.18 +19:14:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176626_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176626_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.66 +22:49:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176637_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176637_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:55.43 +20:35:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176645_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176645_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:55.04 +24:28:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176655_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176655_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.61 +19:56:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176666_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176666_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176672_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176672_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.28 +22:57:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176674_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176674_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:29.36 +22:51:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176679_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176679_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176697_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176697_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:17.05 +22:39:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176700_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176700_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.02 +18:14:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176706_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176706_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.68 +20:00:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176707_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176707_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.17 +22:51:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176734_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176734_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176746_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176746_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.61 +20:16:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176762_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176762_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.63 +19:09:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176771_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176771_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:50.03 +17:03:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176849_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176849_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176859_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
Preparing report for the candidate 176859_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176861_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176861_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176865_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176865_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176866_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176866_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:36.08 +20:45:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176869_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176869_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:56.86 +22:00:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176873_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176873_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:28.61 +23:06:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176875_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176875_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176878_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176878_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.61 +25:50:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176888_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
Preparing report for the candidate 176888_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176901_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
Preparing report for the candidate 176901_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176904_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176904_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:41.41 +22:55:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176929_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176929_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.65 +22:51:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176933_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176933_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:34.93 +22:52:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176939_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176939_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176957_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 176957_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:33.75 +24:10:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:21.37 +18:06:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 05356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:32.73 +26:47:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.08 +25:59:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.45 +24:13:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63943_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
Preparing report for the candidate 63943_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371
The candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-52-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0371 did not pass the final checks
