This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 28.3658* 04 13 09.13 +21 00 39.7 7.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8658,7.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3658 7.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 28.3658* 04 13 09.13 +21 00 39.6 7.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8658,7.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3658 7.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3658 2461311.8658 12.28 04:59:17.33 +25:54:33.7
176.70354 -10.19770 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 0 -0 1 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:59:17.33 +25:54:33.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:59:17.33 +25:54:33.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 28.3658* 04 59 17.33 +25 54 33.7 12.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8658,12.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3658 12.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3658 2461311.8658 13.08 04:08:02.48 +17:55:35.5
175.15992 -24.42509 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -1 -1 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:02.48 +17:55:35.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:02.48 +17:55:35.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 28.3658* 04 08 02.48 +17 55 35.5 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8658,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3658 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3658 2461311.8658 13.27 04:39:56.24 +24:20:49.3
175.18397 -14.60452 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata -0 -0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:56.24 +24:20:49.3: 16.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:56.24 +24:20:49.3: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 28.3658* 04 39 56.24 +24 20 49.3 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8658,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3658 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3658 2461311.8658 13.72 04:30:57.41 +25:25:41.6
172.96805 -15.46288 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia 0 -0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:57.41 +25:25:41.6: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:57.41 +25:25:41.6: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 28.3658* 04 30 57.41 +25 25 41.6 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8658,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3658 13.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3658 2461311.8658 13.77 04:49:47.26 +18:34:55.0
181.35710 -16.36417 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina -0 -1 1 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:49:47.26 +18:34:55.0: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:49:47.26 +18:34:55.0: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 28.3658* 04 49 47.26 +18 34 55.0 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461311.8658,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260928.3658 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461311.86606981 28.09.2026 08:46:58.432 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10763
Objects passed selection criteria: 10725
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8618.5
Average stars matched: 8494.25 (98.5583 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236896 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 28 03:51:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461311.86606981 28.09.2026 08:46:58.432 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 127
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 76144
Objects passed selection criteria: 76015
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61209.2
Average stars matched: 59749.2 (97.6147 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 563024 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 28 03:52:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.86551931
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:37:04.079 +22:01:42.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:37:04.079 +22:01:42.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0466 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:37:02.905 +22:01:54.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:37:02.905 +22:01:54.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0464 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:37:04.079 +22:01:42.68
Second-epoch second image center 04:37:02.905 +22:01:54.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00560 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QkK1dbryqC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q9nZElJodD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GD048cI5X9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WPE91nuzlY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.997400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.997400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.QkK1dbryqC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=0, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 10942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1283 n_q2=1077 n_q3=1448 n_q4=1036 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.q9nZElJodD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=0, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 10166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1107 n_q3=1409 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GD048cI5X9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=460, bad_region=1, passed=5843
Got 5843 stars (including 5377 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5843 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4830 stars left (next iteration limit 5313)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=14.714 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.031 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.031 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=0.495 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.716 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.716 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=0.315 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.476 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.476 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4830 robust_rms_before=1.155 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.329 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.315 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.528 worst_region_rms_after=0.476 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.180 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.476
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.528 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.528 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.329 arcsec matched=4830
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits N_match=4830 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=1065 n_q2=1386 n_q3=1049 n_q4=1330 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WPE91nuzlY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=452, bad_region=1, passed=5829
Got 5829 stars (including 5369 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5829 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4831 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4830 stars left (next iteration limit 5313)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=14.730 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.978 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.978 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.715 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.715 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=0.300 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.468 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.468 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4830 robust_rms_before=1.161 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.300 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.493 worst_region_rms_after=0.468 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.145 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.468
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.493 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.493 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.325 arcsec matched=4830
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits N_match=4830 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1067 n_q2=1382 n_q3=1058 n_q4=1323 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.251
ref2=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.297
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.105
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.119
reference average sigma_overall=0.3275 worst_q_ratio=1.274
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368_astrometric_residuals.png (4830 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369_astrometric_residuals.png (4830 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 20364_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:01.13 +21:44:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20366_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 20366_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.85 +24:18:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
Preparing report for the candidate 20368_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.44 +20:15:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.30 +17:32:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:37:04.079 +22:01:42.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:37:04.079 +22:01:42.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0466 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:37:02.905 +22:01:54.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:37:02.905 +22:01:54.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0464 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:37:04.079 +22:01:42.68
Second-epoch second image center 04:37:02.905 +22:01:54.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00560 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9sqNkpdXBW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9dplbf5ICV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NJZMgBwXmu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NPleLnkSfH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.857350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.857350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.90
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.90
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 80651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec +16.4671 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec 16.4671 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 5197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 80651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 119 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9sqNkpdXBW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=6242, bad_region=8, passed=86318
Got 86318 stars (including 79890 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1260 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1439 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9dplbf5ICV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=5759, bad_region=1, passed=80631
Got 80631 stars (including 74709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1222 n_q2=1136 n_q3=1399 n_q4=1098 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NJZMgBwXmu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1617, bad_region=12, passed=39795
Got 39795 stars (including 38110 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4840 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4840 robust_rms=14.866 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.551 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.551 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4840 robust_rms=0.515 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.718 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.718 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4840 robust_rms=0.314 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.474 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.474 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4840 robust_rms_before=1.147 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.314 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.520 worst_region_rms_after=0.474 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.171 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.474
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.520 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.520 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.325 arcsec matched=4840
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits N_match=4840 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=1081 n_q2=1349 n_q3=1098 n_q4=1312 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NPleLnkSfH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1560, bad_region=14, passed=39748
Got 39748 stars (including 38107 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5327)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=14.858 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.413 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.413 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=0.498 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.724 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.724 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=0.300 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.454 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.454 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4843 robust_rms_before=1.155 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.323 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.300 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.501 worst_region_rms_after=0.454 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.144 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.454
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.501 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.501 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.323 arcsec matched=4843
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1090 n_q2=1346 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1310 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0368.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_2063075_wICIGpTW/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:15:34.55 +23:39:59.7: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:03.39 +22:25:15.7: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:09:08.04 +21:52:57.4: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:36.71 +20:32:28.6: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:59:17.33 +25:54:33.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:36.71 +20:32:28.6: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:09:08.04 +21:52:57.4: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:15:34.55 +23:39:59.7: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:03.39 +22:25:15.7: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:08.04 +21:52:57.4: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6505 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:36.71 +20:32:28.6: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1999 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:34.55 +23:39:59.7: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8206 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:03.39 +22:25:15.7: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1631 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.4: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:59:17.33 +25:54:33.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.4: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.4: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5172 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:02.48 +17:55:35.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:10.08 +24:08:07.0: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:44.30 +20:00:58.6: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:02.48 +17:55:35.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:10.08 +24:08:07.0: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:10.08 +24:08:07.0: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1815 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:44.30 +20:00:58.6: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:56.24 +24:20:49.3: 16.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:44.30 +20:00:58.6: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1247 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:56.24 +24:20:49.3: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:17.84 +27:01:13.2: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:09:56.17 +21:49:37.2: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:17.84 +27:01:13.2: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:17.84 +27:01:13.2: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6606 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:09:56.17 +21:49:37.2: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:56.17 +21:49:37.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3360 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:35.56 +17:25:28.8: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:05.07 +17:10:43.8: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:35.56 +17:25:28.8: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:35.56 +17:25:28.8: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5191 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:05.07 +17:10:43.8: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:05.07 +17:10:43.8: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5251 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:57.41 +25:25:41.6: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:19:09.12 +24:01:34.4: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:57.41 +25:25:41.6: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:49:47.26 +18:34:55.0: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:19:09.12 +24:01:34.4: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:09.12 +24:01:34.4: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7544 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:49:47.26 +18:34:55.0: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:37.60 +21:31:07.3: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:59.10 +20:19:33.0: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:36.87 +22:38:17.2: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:37.60 +21:31:07.3: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:37.60 +21:31:07.3: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3000 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:59.10 +20:19:33.0: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:59.10 +20:19:33.0: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1188 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:36.87 +22:38:17.2: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:36.87 +22:38:17.2: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6992 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101371.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101531.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101614.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101807.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101891.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101178_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101178_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:38.92 +18:06:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101179_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101179_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101181_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101181_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:52.75 +26:43:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101185_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101185_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101187_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101187_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:55.76 +23:38:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101192_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101192_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:31.48 +22:04:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101193_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101193_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101194_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101194_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101195_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101195_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.86 +24:18:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101197_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
Preparing report for the candidate 101197_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101246_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101246_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101247_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101247_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101258_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101258_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101269_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101269_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.69 +19:10:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101309_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101309_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101311_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101311_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101318_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101318_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101348_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101348_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101371_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
Preparing report for the candidate 101371_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101384_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101384_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101393_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101393_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101397_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101397_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101398_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101398_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101402_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101402_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101411_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101411_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101413_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101413_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101428_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101428_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101434_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101434_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:09.71 +22:55:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101442_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101442_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101450_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101450_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.85 +23:48:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101456_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101456_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.82 +26:55:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101467_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101467_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101471_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101471_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.89 +18:26:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101479_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101479_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101480_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101480_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:29.15 +22:48:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101489_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101489_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101525_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101525_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.42 +22:42:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101531_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
Preparing report for the candidate 101531_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101536_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101536_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101560_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101560_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101565_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101565_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:16.88 +23:48:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101569_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101569_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:57.11 +23:57:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101570_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101570_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101571_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101571_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101581_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101581_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:20.97 +23:48:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101588_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101588_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.34 +19:58:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101589_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101589_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:18.07 +23:01:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101594_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101594_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:47.79 +23:58:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101601_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101601_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101614_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
Preparing report for the candidate 101614_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101622_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101622_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101627_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101627_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101635_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101635_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.71 +22:56:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101644_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101644_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:19.36 +24:25:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101652_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101652_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:20.65 +22:10:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101658_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101658_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:29.98 +23:18:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101660_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101660_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:24.35 +18:37:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101666_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101666_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:32.78 +21:00:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101672_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101672_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:27.40 +19:11:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101678_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101678_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101684_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101684_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101690_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101690_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101696_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101696_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:07.13 +24:00:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101697_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101697_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:40.48 +23:44:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101701_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101701_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101714_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101714_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101723_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101723_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101733_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101733_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.89 +21:31:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101750_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101750_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101757_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101757_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101765_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101765_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101773_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101773_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:52.95 +23:55:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101778_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101778_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.70 +22:03:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101781_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101781_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101786_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101786_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.03 +21:45:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101791_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101791_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:25.55 +18:42:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101798_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101798_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101802_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101802_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:16.58 +21:52:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101807_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
Preparing report for the candidate 101807_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101817_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101817_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:33.84 +25:48:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101824_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101824_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101829_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101829_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:55.52 +23:55:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101835_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101835_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101842_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101842_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101852_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101852_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:14.39 +24:06:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101875_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101875_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101878_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101878_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101882_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101882_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:08.26 +20:28:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101889_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101889_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101891_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
Preparing report for the candidate 101891_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101900_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101900_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101909_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101909_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101911_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101911_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101919_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101919_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101958_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101958_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101968_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101968_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101973_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101973_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101977_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101977_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101979_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101979_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101988_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101988_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101989_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101989_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101996_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101996_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101997_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 101997_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102025_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 102025_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102034_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 102034_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102043_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 102043_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:25.61 +19:11:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102047_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 102047_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102062_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 102062_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102074_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 102074_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102075_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 102075_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.14 +22:53:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102076_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 102076_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102077_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 102077_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102081_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 102081_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51118_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 51118_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75113_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 75113_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16230_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 16230_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.53 +18:37:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.45 +20:15:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369
The candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_03-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0369 did not pass the final checks
