FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461202.84134294 11.06.2026 08:11:22.030   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
First image: 2461202.84134294 11.06.2026 08:11:22.030   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Last  image: 2461311.78072490 28.09.2026 06:44:04.631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  12527
Objects passed selection criteria:  12470
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 8815.75
Average stars matched: 8205 (93.0721 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   237976 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Sep 28 03:45:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461202.84134294 11.06.2026 08:11:22.030   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
First image: 2461202.84134294 11.06.2026 08:11:22.030   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Last  image: 2461311.78072490 28.09.2026 06:44:04.631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 45
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -6.84
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  76225
Objects passed selection criteria:  76023
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 56895.2
Average stars matched: 52630 (92.5033 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   292140 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Sep 28 03:46:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Dra-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Dra-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Dra-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 807447 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 807447 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits_preview.png'

Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits


renamed 'Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits_preview.png'

Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 431.0400
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 575.7506
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2984.8734
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 771.8290
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2988.6783
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 772.0117
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 6.92482
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     17.9799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 19.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T01:43:11.8449761' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T06:43:11.8449761' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61311.2799981944 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T06:43:21.7499192' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61311.2801128356 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     287.996139016723 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     69.9995906520599 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =                35.52 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     335.786944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.71798498265428 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Dra-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '19 12 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20683 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20683 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     17.9799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     17.9799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 12.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 65.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               901.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 19.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                218.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/d_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits :)

Spent 0.566276 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/d_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     18.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 19.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T01:44:04.6311992' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T06:44:04.6311992' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61311.2806091551 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T06:44:14.5318058' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61311.2807237385 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     287.996139175097 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     69.9995906299625 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     35.4458333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     335.790277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.72108993029116 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Dra-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '19 12 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20683 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20683 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     18.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     18.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 12.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 65.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               901.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 19.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                218.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/d_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits :)

Spent 0.542342 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/d_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits



fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.78011394
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:51.036 +69:59:55.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09
Second-epoch image center 19:11:51.036 +69:59:55.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0350 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:45.439 +69:59:28.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09
Second-epoch image center 19:11:45.439 +69:59:28.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0458 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  19:11:51.036 +69:59:55.51
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:45.439 +69:59:28.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01099 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PeD9HGRath
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fs8cuT0RdX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qElkKRtHn2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gSLiXD3OLh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 15402 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 260.2575 to 316.2869 deg, Dec +63.6442 to +75.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 260.2575 to 316.2869 deg, Dec 63.6442 to 75.2942 deg
Loaded 13053 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7897 out of 8250 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8250 out of 15402 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.691200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.691200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.53

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.53

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 15402 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 260.2575 to 316.2869 deg, Dec +63.6442 to +75.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 260.2575 to 316.2869 deg, Dec 63.6442 to 75.2942 deg
Loaded 13053 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7897 out of 8250 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8250 out of 15402 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 15513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 260.2579 to 316.2882 deg, Dec +63.6441 to +75.2969 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 260.2579 to 316.2882 deg, Dec 63.6441 to 75.2969 deg
Loaded 13055 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7907 out of 8266 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8266 out of 15513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
 2.2 pix  Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
 15.5 mag.  Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.6 (SNR )  11.5 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.PeD9HGRath (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=889, bad_region=3680, passed=15395
Got 15395 stars (including 10990 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15395 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=1563 n_q2=1085 n_q3=1372 n_q4=877 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits -region wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Fs8cuT0RdX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=885, bad_region=3629, passed=15513
Got 15513 stars (including 11153 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=1569 n_q2=1079 n_q3=1374 n_q4=874 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -region wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qElkKRtHn2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=493, bad_region=1407, passed=7372
Got 7372 stars (including 5546 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7372 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=7.228 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.977 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.977 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.087 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.087 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.385 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.670 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.670 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=0.653 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.386 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.385 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.726 worst_region_rms_after=0.670 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.142 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.670
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.726 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.726 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.386 arcsec matched=4893
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.359 n_q1=1363 n_q2=826 n_q3=1768 n_q4=936 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gSLiXD3OLh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=511, bad_region=1405, passed=7291
Got 7291 stars (including 5461 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7291 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=7.278 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.151 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.151 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.199 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.199 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.673 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.673 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=0.653 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.381 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.376 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.712 worst_region_rms_after=0.673 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.134 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.673
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.712 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.712 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.381 arcsec matched=4890
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=1356 n_q2=821 n_q3=1766 n_q4=947 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.090
ref2=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.142
new1=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.152
new2=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.137
reference average sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.116
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20786_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 20786_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    11.25    18:42:15.99 +73:04:34.4   6101 1258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  18:42:16.01 +73:04:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21206_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 21206_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    10.34    18:22:00.99 +69:50:10.8   7368 3045   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  18:22:01.04 +69:50:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05445_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 05445_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    10.97    19:40:57.95 +67:46:05.7   3112 4428   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:40:57.96 +67:46:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:51.036 +69:59:55.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09
Second-epoch image center 19:11:51.036 +69:59:55.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0350 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:45.439 +69:59:28.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09
Second-epoch image center 19:11:45.439 +69:59:28.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0458 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  19:11:51.036 +69:59:55.51
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:45.439 +69:59:28.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01099 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PaPUbUPotX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DXxkiqZhLi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZMY4w1XH8q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1QWzjXUkOg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 87306 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 259.8704 to 316.2868 deg, Dec +63.5731 to +75.2954 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 259.8704 to 316.2868 deg, Dec 63.5731 to 75.2954 deg
Loaded 13259 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7206 out of 8361 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8361 out of 87306 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.553500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.553500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -6.84
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.71

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.71

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 87306 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 259.8704 to 316.2868 deg, Dec +63.5731 to +75.2954 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 259.8704 to 316.2868 deg, Dec 63.5731 to 75.2954 deg
Loaded 13259 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7206 out of 8361 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8361 out of 87306 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 87167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 259.8495 to 316.2882 deg, Dec +63.6400 to +75.3023 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 259.8495 to 316.2882 deg, Dec 63.6400 to 75.3023 deg
Loaded 13146 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7230 out of 8373 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8373 out of 87167 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
 2.1 pix  Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.7 mag.  Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
 15.7 mag.  Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.7 (SNR )  14.0 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PaPUbUPotX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=6474, bad_region=14130, passed=87289
Got 87289 stars (including 68116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87289 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=1549 n_q2=1051 n_q3=1436 n_q4=873 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits -region wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DXxkiqZhLi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=6408, bad_region=13846, passed=87157
Got 87157 stars (including 68236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87157 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1559 n_q2=1045 n_q3=1431 n_q4=874 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -region wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZMY4w1XH8q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2212, bad_region=5821, passed=46975
Got 46975 stars (including 39275 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42702 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=7.192 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.851 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.851 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.493 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.147 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.147 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.386 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.676 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.676 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4902 robust_rms_before=0.646 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.386 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.715 worst_region_rms_after=0.676 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.164 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.676
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.715 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.715 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.379 arcsec matched=4902
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1369 n_q2=818 n_q3=1763 n_q4=952 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1QWzjXUkOg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2278, bad_region=5806, passed=47150
Got 47150 stars (including 39408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47150 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=7.231 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.797 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.797 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=0.477 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.250 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.250 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=0.377 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.674 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.674 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4895 robust_rms_before=0.646 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.377 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.688 worst_region_rms_after=0.674 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.146 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.674
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.688 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.688 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.370 arcsec matched=4895
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=1380 n_q2=810 n_q3=1748 n_q4=957 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:54:34.70 +66:41:44.5:  14.04 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:33:29.35 +67:45:52.1:  13.50 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:46:57.48 +66:30:13.9:  13.78 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:51:50.83 +69:10:05.2:  13.45 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:41:54.45 +66:29:42.2:  12.68 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:19:12.70 +67:12:35.7:  12.28 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:43:50.67 +71:12:31.4:  12.99 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:45:47.92 +66:25:14.9:  13.04 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:51:50.83 +69:10:05.2:  13.42 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:46:57.48 +66:30:13.9:  13.80 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:33:29.35 +67:45:52.1:  13.41 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:54:34.70 +66:41:44.5:  14.00 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:37:23.50 +71:52:40.9:  10.96 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:57.48 +66:30:13.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7248 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:33:29.35 +67:45:52.1: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7443 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:50.83 +69:10:05.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.0208 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:34.70 +66:41:44.5: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3399 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:43:50.67 +71:12:31.4:  13.09 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:19:12.70 +67:12:35.7:  12.26 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:41:54.45 +66:29:42.2:  12.69 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:45:47.92 +66:25:14.9:  13.07 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:50.67 +71:12:31.4: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1688 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:12.70 +67:12:35.7: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4555 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:54.45 +66:29:42.2: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0033 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:47.92 +66:25:14.9: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2031 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:32:29.06 +71:48:40.5:  12.73 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:37:23.50 +71:52:40.9:  10.99 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.97 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:23.50 +71:52:40.9: ref_mag=10.97 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2141 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:32:29.06 +71:48:40.5:  12.74 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:29.06 +71:48:40.5: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8309 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:07:26.68 +72:14:23.6:  14.10 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:07:26.68 +72:14:23.6:  14.10 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:26.68 +72:14:23.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9766 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103315_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103315_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    14.21    19:20:43.33 +67:50:23.3   4268 4482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:20:43.14 +67:50:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103316_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103316_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.28011    2461311.78011    14.30    19:54:34.77 +66:41:44.4   2224 4956   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    14.39    19:54:34.63 +66:41:44.5   2220 4951   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103321_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103321_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.28011    2461311.78011    14.20    19:51:50.64 +69:10:05.3   2645 3505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.92    19:51:51.02 +69:10:05.1   2640 3500   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103330_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103330_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.97    19:27:36.77 +67:53:49.9   3878 4425   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:27:37.21 +67:53:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103331_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103331_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.68    19:34:13.16 +73:10:08.0   3822 1218   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:34:13.27 +73:10:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103335_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103335_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.28011    2461311.78011    13.77    19:33:29.32 +67:45:52.6   3542 4482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.72    19:33:29.39 +67:45:51.5   3537 4477   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103337_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103337_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.59    19:15:18.15 +73:14:01.1   4650 1231   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:15:17.90 +73:14:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103338_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103338_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.67    19:13:46.75 +67:34:01.2   4661 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:13:46.90 +67:34:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103340_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103340_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.28011    2461311.78011    13.64    19:46:57.56 +66:30:13.5   2659 5145   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.84    19:46:57.41 +66:30:14.4   2654 5140   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103343_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103343_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.21    19:57:38.83 +68:09:21.2   2212 4046   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:57:38.76 +68:09:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103345_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103345_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.28011    2461311.78011    13.15    19:43:50.67 +71:12:31.4   3242 2348   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.19    19:43:50.67 +71:12:31.5   3238 2344   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103347_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103347_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.28011    2461311.78011    13.17    19:45:47.96 +66:25:15.5   2721 5205   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.24    19:45:47.89 +66:25:14.3   2716 5201   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103348_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103348_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.28011    2461311.78011    12.96    19:41:54.46 +66:29:41.8   2961 5193   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.05    19:41:54.44 +66:29:42.6   2956 5188   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103350_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103350_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.28011    2461311.78011    12.44    19:19:12.73 +67:12:35.8   4345 4872   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    12.48    19:19:12.68 +67:12:35.5   4340 4867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103351_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103351_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    12.43    19:58:33.85 +72:13:56.2   2652 1612   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:58:33.76 +72:13:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103352_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103352_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    12.15    19:44:34.42 +66:50:11.0   2826 4961   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:44:34.39 +66:50:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103353_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 103353_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.28011    2461311.78011    11.15    19:37:23.57 +71:52:41.2   3600 1986   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    11.30    19:37:23.44 +71:52:40.6   3595 1981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105718_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 105718_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    12.32    19:12:06.53 +67:40:34.5   4758 4594   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:12:06.51 +67:40:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106946_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 106946_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.28011    2461311.78011    12.84    19:32:29.06 +71:48:39.9   3826 2050   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    12.83    19:32:29.06 +71:48:41.1   3821 2045   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107282_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 107282_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.14    19:49:08.67 +65:58:26.2   2471 5439   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:49:08.62 +65:58:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107300_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 107300_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.11    20:06:24.33 +71:56:17.8   2255 1707   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  20:06:24.36 +71:56:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107526_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 107526_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.03    19:24:05.57 +72:33:43.5   4243 1621   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:24:05.46 +72:33:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107587_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 107587_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.11    19:52:38.95 +66:43:19.9   2337 4955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:52:38.93 +66:43:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107642_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 107642_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.08    19:57:47.69 +71:55:54.4   2651 1798   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:57:47.69 +71:55:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107979_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 107979_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.00    18:19:25.87 +71:31:08.8   7291 2019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  18:19:25.90 +71:31:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108675_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 108675_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.28    19:16:30.83 +73:54:13.3   4608 0822   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:16:30.73 +73:54:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108766_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 108766_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.25    18:53:56.27 +67:06:17.9   5823 4911   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  18:53:56.22 +67:06:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109145_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 109145_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.39    19:12:44.34 +67:42:29.1   4722 4575   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:12:44.31 +67:42:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109636_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 109636_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.29    19:11:20.17 +66:59:45.8   4800 5007   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:11:20.09 +66:59:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110293_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 110293_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.58    19:31:22.47 +70:59:25.2   3830 2545   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:31:22.65 +70:59:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111260_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 111260_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.59    19:44:24.38 +71:20:42.3   3222 2258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:44:24.45 +71:20:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112725_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 112725_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.28011    2461311.78011    14.20    19:07:26.51 +72:14:22.8   5003 1840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-43-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    13.86    19:07:26.86 +72:14:24.5   4998 1835   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113044_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 113044_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    14.21    18:57:20.19 +71:31:18.7   5487 2255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  18:57:20.27 +71:31:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49207_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 49207_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    10.35    18:22:01.11 +69:50:10.6   7368 3045   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  18:22:01.10 +69:50:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17156_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 17156_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    12.06    18:27:48.71 +66:23:24.1   7430 5163   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  18:27:48.69 +66:23:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85757_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 85757_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    12.44    19:28:02.30 +71:34:38.7   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51408_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 51408_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    11.96    18:51:29.88 +70:25:20.6   5816 2900   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  18:51:29.89 +70:25:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28890_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 28890_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 28.28072    2461311.78072    11.18    19:40:57.89 +67:46:06.1   3112 4428   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_034234_TTUQ2b1x1_1910083_ALR0z1uP/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_01-44-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits

**** FOUND  19:40:57.88 +67:46:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Dra-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.78011394 -observatory V36
13:36:42.79 -11:35:20.4 Mercury (-0.1mag)
14:11:42.86 -20:28:43.8 Venus (-4.8mag)
08:08:26.00 +21:09:10.4 Mars (1.1mag)
09:25:22.24 +15:46:19.3 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:46:13.31 +02:01:10.1 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:09.93 +21:00:42.0 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:11:39.55 -00:17:05.9 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:28.98 -23:42:58.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
01:27:14.66 +13:20:05.9 Moon (-12.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 28 03:45 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.78011394:
09:25:29.35 +15:45:42.3 Io (9.4mag)
09:25:23.87 +15:46:12.3 Europa (6.3mag)
09:25:37.08 +15:45:00.3 Ganymede (7.9mag)
09:25:32.97 +15:45:23.9 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:24:11.53 +16:08:16.9 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:25:25.89 +15:46:01.5 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:23:24.34 +16:04:23.3 Elara (17.6mag)
09:28:31.57 +15:09:30.9 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:24:55.42 +16:09:55.6 Carme (18.9mag)
00:46:01.86 +02:00:53.1 Titan (8.2mag)
00:46:13.78 +02:01:11.3 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:45:36.68 +01:59:52.2 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:46:26.89 +02:00:35.2 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:44:41.04 +01:49:20.7 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 28 03:45 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.78011394:
01:08:13.84 +18:33:20.3 JWST
17:20:03.15 +37:40:29.1 Chandra
06:17:46.38 +21:53:27.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 28 03:45 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.78011394 -observatory V36
03:47:34.07 +20:02:33.5 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:14:11.51 -33:47:33.2 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:33:26.45 -71:33:12.4 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:43.34 +34:16:20.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:06:16.50 +47:48:37.9 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
21:58:24.93 +25:50:54.8 17.6mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:24:00.91 +25:37:18.0 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
11:08:29.71 +26:35:35.1 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
10:01:23.85 +05:07:12.4 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:12.46 -17:28:20.1 15.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:54:31.87 +34:25:07.5 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:10:49.42 +15:07:57.2 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:25:59.65 +42:10:07.0 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:01:22.75 +47:36:54.1 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:44:04.92 -13:22:54.4 14.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
11:53:19.56 +17:04:39.6 16.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:38:11.10 -01:37:10.6 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:50:10.19 +69:35:18.5 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:50:03.80 +44:51:04.9 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:33:04.38 +13:02:02.5 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:44:39.61 -34:05:53.9 14.0mag 10P/Tempel
01:51:48.45 +39:37:51.8 17.1mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:02:22.48 -07:06:06.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:50:48.50 -11:33:20.2 17.9mag 63P/Wild
07:16:33.35 +17:22:36.9 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:10:59.74 +14:50:26.8 16.9mag 88P/Howell
06:51:11.15 +36:11:38.6 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:30:18.06 +18:39:01.7 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:13:37.54 +16:15:00.6 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:34:37.53 -28:17:53.7 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos
06:40:03.88 +19:52:08.1 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:57:03.13 -08:58:45.3 13.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:47:48.84 +05:03:15.3 13.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:33:07.53 +06:15:42.5 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:39:23.44 +42:10:06.5 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
09:42:15.43 +32:30:03.1 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Sep 28 03:45 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40  ASASSN-26fg  2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40  SN2026aajs  2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70  AT2026acgs  2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10  ASASSN-26ff  2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20  SN2026yjv  2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10  V8055  2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 28 03:45 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6  PNV J00421393+4116356  2026-09-22.6597  19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5  TCP J18140158+1513555  2026-09-24.4645  14.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Sep 28 03:45 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
01:12:19.993 -37:57:49.91  AT 2026aaxy  2026-09-04.62 20.15
22:04:50.285 -46:53:46.94  AT 2026aaxx  2026-09-06.57 19.67
01:57:55.362 -22:31:24.48  AT 2026aaxw  2026-08-31.66 19.65
01:52:55.402 -09:12:08.29  AT 2026aaxv  2026-09-04.64 20.08
05:04:14.730 -42:14:07.54  AT 2026aaxu  2026-09-03.80 19.73
00:02:28.077 -23:32:16.72  AT 2026aaxt  2026-09-04.59 20.16
01:03:33.302 -33:27:15.30  AT 2026aaxs  2026-08-22.73 20.13
02:42:04.255 -11:07:39.46  AT 2026aaxr  2026-09-03.17 19.67
02:31:19.833 -25:27:29.88  SN 2026aaxq  2026-09-06.65 20.16
00:52:57.241 -59:43:14.89  AT 2026aaxp  2026-09-06.70 19.51
01:20:22.758 -62:39:05.68  AT 2026aaxo  2026-09-06.70 20.13
00:14:01.541 -00:00:55.27  AT 2026aaxn  2026-09-08.53 19.62
04:14:33.098 -37:43:12.21  AT 2026aaxm  2026-08-22.80 20.49
19:48:31.105 -23:12:17.17  AT 2026aaxl  2026-09-04.43 20.19
00:38:15.294 -37:17:09.43  AT 2026aaxk  2026-09-04.60 20.02
21:01:01.181 -13:41:08.56  SN 2026aaxj  2026-09-08.41 19.99
22:54:22.028 -56:22:37.05  AT 2026aaxi  2026-09-08.58 20.16
01:42:07.146 -40:01:01.18  AT 2026aaxh  2026-09-04.64 20.37
21:44:13.978 -09:13:15.35  AT 2026aaxg  2026-09-08.45 20.21
02:32:42.330 -42:59:32.85  AT 2026aaxf  2026-09-04.67 20.08
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 28 03:45 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Mon Sep 28 03:44:50 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 26s (0.43 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 5s (0.08 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 2s (0.03 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 38s (0.63 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 10 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 3 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 20s (0.33 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 12s (0.20 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 37s (0.62 min)
FIELD_Dra-05-Q2b1x1: 89s (1.48 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 111s (1.85 min)
Finished: Mon Sep 28 03:46:41 CDT 2026