######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 811197 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 811197 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits

renamed 'UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 533.1221
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 561.4736
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4153.4442
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 913.0332
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4144.5070
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 910.7466
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 7.79079
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 17.6000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T02:24:29.8229229' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T07:24:29.8229229' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61311.3086784952 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T07:24:39.7232944' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61311.3087930903 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.996958954701 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 70.0002717259144 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.1577777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 16.7308333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.8807613864621 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20687 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20687 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.6000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.6000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 70.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 333.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits :)
Spent 0.550065 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 17.5599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T02:25:27.1047023' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T07:25:27.1047023' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61311.3093414814 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T07:25:37.0075041' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61311.3094560998 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.996958847058 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 70.0002717800183 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.2138888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 16.7922222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.87322799715395 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20687 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20687 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.5599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.5599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 70.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 333.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits :)
Spent 0.566975 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits

fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.80879424
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:07.414 +70:00:10.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:36:07.414 +70:00:10.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0238 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:06.155 +70:00:12.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:36:06.155 +70:00:12.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:07.414 +70:00:10.19
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:06.155 +70:00:12.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00190 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4XCCZB87ok
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8KwXXJyh0w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jKxjuGRSXp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0zstPCwcJK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg
Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5117 out of 5413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5413 out of 8779 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.863700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.863700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg
Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5117 out of 5413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5413 out of 8779 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0326 to 171.9963 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0326 to 171.9963 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg
Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5133 out of 5416 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5416 out of 8894 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.1 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
14.0 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
14.1 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.4XCCZB87ok (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=2580, passed=8779
Got 8779 stars (including 5709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=1463 n_q2=1040 n_q3=1488 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8KwXXJyh0w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, bad_region=2596, passed=8894
Got 8894 stars (including 5826 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=1470 n_q2=1032 n_q3=1493 n_q4=898 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.275
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jKxjuGRSXp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=327, bad_region=644, passed=3312
Got 3312 stars (including 2398 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3312 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2329 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2326 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2326 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2329 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2326 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2326 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 2326 stars left (next iteration limit 2558)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2326 robust_rms=7.410 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.360 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.360 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2326 robust_rms=0.707 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.855 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.855 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2326 robust_rms=0.494 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.631 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.631 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2326 robust_rms_before=1.106 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.471 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.494 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.566 worst_region_rms_after=0.631 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.530 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.631
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.566 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.566 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.471 arcsec matched=2326
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits N_match=2326 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=742 n_q2=355 n_q3=843 n_q4=386 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0zstPCwcJK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=322, bad_region=645, passed=3309
Got 3309 stars (including 2395 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3309 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2327 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2324 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2324 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2327 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2324 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2324 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 2324 stars left (next iteration limit 2556)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2324 robust_rms=7.542 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.883 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.883 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2324 robust_rms=0.703 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.802 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.778 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2324 robust_rms=0.512 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.624 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.624 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2324 robust_rms_before=1.089 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.472 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.512 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.550 worst_region_rms_after=0.624 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.586 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.624
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.550 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.550 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.472 arcsec matched=2324
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits N_match=2324 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=733 n_q2=353 n_q3=858 n_q4=380 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.403 worst_q_ratio=1.256
ref2=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.275
new1=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits sigma_overall=0.491 worst_q_ratio=1.116
new2=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits sigma_overall=0.478 worst_q_ratio=1.139
reference average sigma_overall=0.4045 worst_q_ratio=1.2655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334_astrometric_residuals.png (2326 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335_astrometric_residuals.png (2324 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:07.414 +70:00:10.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:36:07.414 +70:00:10.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0238 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:06.155 +70:00:12.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:36:06.155 +70:00:12.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:07.414 +70:00:10.19
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:06.155 +70:00:12.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00190 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IdKdWMwghs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DWc1JXPRBo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits &> /tmp/tmp.81pNsvodEk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SaLXWtQ2dG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec +62.8119 to +75.4848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec 62.8119 to 75.4848 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4865 out of 5490 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5490 out of 51532 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.743500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.743500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec +62.8119 to +75.4848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec 62.8119 to 75.4848 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4865 out of 5490 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5490 out of 51532 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 51887 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.6991 to 172.5281 deg, Dec +62.8124 to +75.4915 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.6991 to 172.5281 deg, Dec 62.8124 to 75.4915 deg
Loaded 9544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4853 out of 5491 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5491 out of 51887 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
1.9 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.8 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
14.3 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
14.3 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.IdKdWMwghs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2624, bad_region=12474, passed=51522
Got 51522 stars (including 37098 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=1490 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1494 n_q4=896 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DWc1JXPRBo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2687, bad_region=12460, passed=51868
Got 51868 stars (including 37397 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51868 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1497 n_q2=1018 n_q3=1496 n_q4=894 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.81pNsvodEk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=726, bad_region=3168, passed=20710
Got 20710 stars (including 16910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20710 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=7.331 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.262 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.262 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.713 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.869 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.869 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.515 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.667 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.667 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4882 robust_rms_before=1.120 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.480 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.515 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.609 worst_region_rms_after=0.667 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.522 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.667
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.609 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.609 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.480 arcsec matched=4882
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=1556 n_q2=763 n_q3=1714 n_q4=849 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.SaLXWtQ2dG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=734, bad_region=3181, passed=20786
Got 20786 stars (including 16984 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20786 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=7.459 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.177 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.177 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.713 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.806 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.803 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.528 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.654 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.654 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=1.107 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.487 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.528 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.573 worst_region_rms_after=0.654 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.571 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.654
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.573 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.573 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.487 arcsec matched=4886
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.432 n_q1=1555 n_q2=768 n_q3=1725 n_q4=838 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:34:07.67 +69:51:00.6: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:34:07.67 +69:51:00.6: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:34:07.67 +69:51:00.6: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1790 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64923_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335
The candidate 64923_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.30946 | 2461311.80946 | 10.61 | 10:21:44.57 +67:44:47.3 | 7319 1924 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65077_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335
The candidate 65077_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.30946 | 2461311.80946 | 10.96 | 09:18:25.51 +69:55:35.3 | 3875 3235 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67514_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335
The candidate 67514_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.30946 | 2461311.80946 | 12.96 | 08:46:06.99 +73:23:02.0 | 2777 5588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67660_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335
The candidate 67660_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.30946 | 2461311.80946 | 13.18 | 08:59:18.87 +67:23:44.6 | 2576 1904 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits |
**** FOUND 08:59:18.91 +67:23:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67711_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335
The candidate 67711_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.30946 | 2461311.80946 | 13.04 | 09:18:43.18 +67:14:22.4 | 3677 1622 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits |
**** FOUND 09:18:43.07 +67:14:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68211_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335
The candidate 68211_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.30879 | 2461311.80879 | 13.22 | 09:34:07.79 +69:51:01.0 | 4680 3110 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0334.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.30946 | 2461311.80946 | 13.15 | 09:34:07.55 +69:51:00.2 | 4681 3109 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69201_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335
The candidate 69201_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.30946 | 2461311.80946 | 13.74 | 09:18:55.61 +65:56:42.2 | 3587 0841 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69363_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335
The candidate 69363_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.30946 | 2461311.80946 | 13.43 | 09:09:05.41 +69:16:53.2 | 3330 2923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69644_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335
The candidate 69644_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.30946 | 2461311.80946 | 13.58 | 10:23:25.85 +73:28:22.2 | 6950 5374 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25922_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335
The candidate 25922_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 28.30946 | 2461311.80946 | 12.99 | 08:52:15.09 +70:26:24.1 | 2613 3786 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_033835_TTUQ2b1x1_1839705_lwmx7lIo/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-25-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits |
**** FOUND 08:52:15.06 +70:26:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.80879424 -observatory V36
13:36:51.56 -11:36:23.9 Mercury (-0.1mag)
14:11:44.12 -20:28:59.5 Venus (-4.8mag)
08:08:30.30 +21:08:59.5 Mars (1.1mag)
09:25:23.50 +15:46:13.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:46:12.81 +02:01:06.9 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:09.82 +21:00:41.7 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:11:39.37 -00:17:07.0 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:28.92 -23:42:58.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
01:28:09.65 +13:30:43.6 Moon (-12.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 28 03:41 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.80879424:
09:25:30.42 +15:45:37.7 Io (9.4mag)
09:25:24.62 +15:46:09.5 Europa (6.3mag)
09:25:38.13 +15:44:55.9 Ganymede (7.9mag)
09:25:34.51 +15:45:16.8 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:24:12.90 +16:08:11.4 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:25:26.53 +15:45:59.0 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:23:25.66 +16:04:18.3 Elara (17.6mag)
09:28:32.75 +15:09:25.1 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:24:56.55 +16:09:50.5 Carme (18.9mag)
00:46:01.46 +02:00:49.6 Titan (8.2mag)
00:46:13.06 +02:01:08.4 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:45:36.15 +01:59:48.6 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:46:26.46 +02:00:32.1 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:44:40.52 +01:49:17.4 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 28 03:41 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.80879424:
01:08:18.06 +18:34:18.0 JWST
17:23:32.10 +36:52:16.3 Chandra
06:29:57.97 +15:46:37.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 28 03:41 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.80879424 -observatory V36
03:47:34.16 +20:02:35.8 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:14:12.73 -33:47:30.8 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:33:27.42 -71:33:19.0 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:43.31 +34:16:23.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:06:16.26 +47:48:47.3 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
21:58:23.85 +25:50:39.9 17.6mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:24:01.86 +25:37:16.6 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
11:08:31.24 +26:35:32.7 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
10:01:24.84 +05:07:12.0 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:12.53 -17:28:29.0 15.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:54:33.00 +34:25:16.5 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:10:49.90 +15:07:56.7 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:25:59.49 +42:10:01.4 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:01:21.08 +47:36:43.4 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:44:05.37 -13:22:56.3 14.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
11:53:22.62 +17:04:31.1 16.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:38:12.74 -01:37:19.3 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:50:16.80 +69:34:49.4 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:50:02.09 +44:50:55.2 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:33:06.05 +13:02:11.6 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:44:41.14 -34:05:38.8 14.0mag 10P/Tempel
01:51:50.84 +39:37:54.3 17.1mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:02:23.66 -07:06:14.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:50:52.00 -11:33:51.0 17.9mag 63P/Wild
07:16:36.10 +17:22:26.7 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:10:58.58 +14:50:24.1 16.9mag 88P/Howell
06:51:17.37 +36:12:13.5 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:30:22.55 +18:38:28.1 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:13:41.22 +16:14:37.3 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:34:41.66 -28:18:25.9 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos
06:40:05.48 +19:52:04.0 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:56:43.90 -08:57:15.1 13.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:47:52.40 +05:02:45.8 13.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:33:07.42 +06:15:29.9 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:39:27.06 +42:10:32.9 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
09:42:17.38 +32:29:55.8 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Sep 28 03:41 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 28 03:41 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Sep 28 03:41 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
01:12:19.993 -37:57:49.91 AT 2026aaxy 2026-09-04.62 20.15
22:04:50.285 -46:53:46.94 AT 2026aaxx 2026-09-06.57 19.67
01:57:55.362 -22:31:24.48 AT 2026aaxw 2026-08-31.66 19.65
01:52:55.402 -09:12:08.29 AT 2026aaxv 2026-09-04.64 20.08
05:04:14.730 -42:14:07.54 AT 2026aaxu 2026-09-03.80 19.73
00:02:28.077 -23:32:16.72 AT 2026aaxt 2026-09-04.59 20.16
01:03:33.302 -33:27:15.30 AT 2026aaxs 2026-08-22.73 20.13
02:42:04.255 -11:07:39.46 AT 2026aaxr 2026-09-03.17 19.67
02:31:19.833 -25:27:29.88 SN 2026aaxq 2026-09-06.65 20.16
00:52:57.241 -59:43:14.89 AT 2026aaxp 2026-09-06.70 19.51
01:20:22.758 -62:39:05.68 AT 2026aaxo 2026-09-06.70 20.13
00:14:01.541 -00:00:55.27 AT 2026aaxn 2026-09-08.53 19.62
04:14:33.098 -37:43:12.21 AT 2026aaxm 2026-08-22.80 20.49
19:48:31.105 -23:12:17.17 AT 2026aaxl 2026-09-04.43 20.19
00:38:15.294 -37:17:09.43 AT 2026aaxk 2026-09-04.60 20.02
21:01:01.181 -13:41:08.56 SN 2026aaxj 2026-09-08.41 19.99
22:54:22.028 -56:22:37.05 AT 2026aaxi 2026-09-08.58 20.16
01:42:07.146 -40:01:01.18 AT 2026aaxh 2026-09-04.64 20.37
21:44:13.978 -09:13:15.35 AT 2026aaxg 2026-09-08.45 20.21
02:32:42.330 -42:59:32.85 AT 2026aaxf 2026-09-04.67 20.08
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 28 03:41 tns_transients_list.txt