This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3067 2461311.8067 14.35 04:39:32.11 +73:56:21.5
137.03285 17.70841 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:39:32.11 +73:56:21.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:39:32.11 +73:56:21.5: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:39:32.11 +73:56:21.5: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461311.8067,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260928.3067 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3067 2461311.8067 14.40 04:38:07.89 +67:12:03.5
142.36874 13.34901 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:38:07.89 +67:12:03.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:38:07.89 +67:12:03.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:38:07.89 +67:12:03.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461311.8067,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260928.3067 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 28.3067 2461311.8067 14.74 04:05:00.84 +67:38:48.7
139.79312 11.35990 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.3" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:05:00.84 +67:38:48.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:05:00.84 +67:38:48.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:05:00.84 +67:38:48.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461311.8067,14.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260928.3067 14.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
First image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Last image: 2461311.80692630 28.09.2026 07:21:48.432 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12479
Objects passed selection criteria: 12420
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8966
Average stars matched: 8324.5 (92.8452 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237844 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 28 03:37:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
First image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Last image: 2461311.80692630 28.09.2026 07:21:48.432 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 121
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.00
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 92598
Objects passed selection criteria: 92298
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 69384
Average stars matched: 64047.8 (92.3091 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 574608 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Sep 28 03:38:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.80643279
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:55.807 +69:59:44.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:47:55.807 +69:59:44.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0074 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:55.223 +69:59:45.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:47:55.223 +69:59:45.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:47:55.807 +69:59:44.21
Second-epoch second image center 04:47:55.223 +69:59:45.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00089 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00089 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AfZESseZT4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DmyqWUIwWU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p8iNhVMFY7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6Et0Z3UXvN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8762 to +75.4796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8762 to 75.4796 deg
Loaded 14362 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7657 out of 8219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8219 out of 14898 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.834600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.834600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8762 to +75.4796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8762 to 75.4796 deg
Loaded 14362 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7657 out of 8219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8219 out of 14898 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.9862 to 100.4595 deg, Dec +62.8761 to +75.4908 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.9862 to 100.4595 deg, Dec 62.8761 to 75.4908 deg
Loaded 14321 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7671 out of 8229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8229 out of 14971 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.AfZESseZT4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1217, bad_region=3282, passed=14898
Got 14898 stars (including 10612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=1447 n_q2=1010 n_q3=1615 n_q4=837 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DmyqWUIwWU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1204, bad_region=3285, passed=14971
Got 14971 stars (including 10710 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1457 n_q2=1013 n_q3=1611 n_q4=832 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.p8iNhVMFY7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=619, bad_region=1568, passed=7963
Got 7963 stars (including 5882 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7963 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4903 robust_rms=7.000 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.229 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.229 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4903 robust_rms=0.491 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.977 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.977 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4903 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.686 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.686 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4903 robust_rms_before=0.893 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.426 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.766 worst_region_rms_after=0.686 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.278 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.686
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:55.807 +69:59:43.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7963 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1708965.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.893 -> 0.411 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4903 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4787 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4787 pairs (4903 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=6.951 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.006 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.006 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.940 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.940 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.408 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.683 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.683 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4787 robust_rms_before=0.408 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.408 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.408 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.678 worst_region_rms_after=0.683 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.678 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.683
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.683 vs 0.678 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits N_match=4787 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=1389 n_q2=909 n_q3=1561 n_q4=928 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.032
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6Et0Z3UXvN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=615, bad_region=1551, passed=7903
Got 7903 stars (including 5842 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7903 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=6.974 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.139 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.139 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.490 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.051 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.051 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.413 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.689 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.689 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=0.900 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.435 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.413 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.744 worst_region_rms_after=0.689 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.284 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.689
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.744 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.744 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.435 arcsec matched=4905
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1423 n_q2=936 n_q3=1598 n_q4=948 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.208
ref2=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.185
new1=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.032
new2=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits sigma_overall=0.462 worst_q_ratio=1.051
reference average sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.1965
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (4913 matched stars from wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330_astrometric_residuals.png (4787 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331_astrometric_residuals.png (4905 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Another copy of lib/update_offline_catalogs.sh is updating the catalogs right now - not downloading anything in this run
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21514_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 21514_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.02 +66:08:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22159_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 22159_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:55.807 +69:59:43.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:47:55.807 +69:59:43.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0075 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:55.223 +69:59:45.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:47:55.223 +69:59:45.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:47:55.807 +69:59:43.48
Second-epoch second image center 04:47:55.223 +69:59:45.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00098 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00098 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y0Ce5g76Mc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AcZ2NS8R2P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LqW0zpViwA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7ib2hLkdW3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8211 to +75.4976 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8211 to 75.4976 deg
Loaded 14469 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6735 out of 8427 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8427 out of 107757 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.687900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.687900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8211 to +75.4976 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8211 to 75.4976 deg
Loaded 14469 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6735 out of 8427 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8427 out of 107757 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 108260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6873 to 100.6251 deg, Dec +62.8267 to +75.5092 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6873 to 100.6251 deg, Dec 62.8267 to 75.5092 deg
Loaded 14512 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6694 out of 8433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8433 out of 108260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 102 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.7 mag. Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Y0Ce5g76Mc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=43, blended=8978, bad_region=18142, passed=107714
Got 107714 stars (including 81712 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 107714 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=1460 n_q2=988 n_q3=1623 n_q4=852 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.AcZ2NS8R2P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=8926, bad_region=18368, passed=108235
Got 108235 stars (including 82087 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 108235 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1447 n_q2=1002 n_q3=1616 n_q4=856 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LqW0zpViwA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=3163, bad_region=7027, passed=56803
Got 56803 stars (including 47386 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56803 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=6.976 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.616 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.616 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.495 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.014 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.014 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.407 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.665 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.665 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4912 robust_rms_before=0.407 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.407 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.676 worst_region_rms_after=0.665 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.676 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.665
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.676 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.676 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.407 arcsec matched=4912
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.436 n_q1=1462 n_q2=903 n_q3=1610 n_q4=937 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.045
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7ib2hLkdW3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=3185, bad_region=7026, passed=56841
Got 56841 stars (including 47418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56841 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=6.913 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.909 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.909 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.494 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.076 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.076 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.690 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.690 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4911 robust_rms_before=0.892 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.430 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.764 worst_region_rms_after=0.690 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.345 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.690
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.764 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.764 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.430 arcsec matched=4911
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=1460 n_q2=901 n_q3=1621 n_q4=929 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.047
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_033434_TTUQ2b1x1_1689899_8xBFm3L0/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Another copy of lib/update_offline_catalogs.sh is updating the catalogs right now - not downloading anything in this run
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:51:22.20 +66:24:38.7: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:58:11.66 +70:48:09.0: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:39:32.11 +73:56:21.5: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:57:25.23 +69:59:03.2: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:51:22.20 +66:24:38.7: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:58:11.66 +70:48:09.0: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:39:32.11 +73:56:21.5: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:22.20 +66:24:38.7: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4885 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:11.66 +70:48:09.0: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8634 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:57:25.23 +69:59:03.2: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:25.23 +69:59:03.2: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7206 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:07:35.30 +67:15:49.1: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:07:35.30 +67:15:49.1: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:35.30 +67:15:49.1: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7770 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:38:07.89 +67:12:03.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:05:00.84 +67:38:48.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:38:07.89 +67:12:03.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:05:00.84 +67:38:48.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out125841.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out137647.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out137846.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125840_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125840_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125841_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
Preparing report for the candidate 125841_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125847_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125847_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:51.08 +72:10:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125857_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125857_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:59.72 +67:45:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125863_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125863_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:06.79 +69:53:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125865_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125865_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125866_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125866_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:16.75 +70:31:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125869_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125869_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:00.59 +71:13:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125872_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125872_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:18.89 +67:57:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125873_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125873_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125875_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125875_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125876_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125876_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:35.06 +67:30:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125879_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125879_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:39.10 +68:29:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125881_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125881_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:06.10 +73:24:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125882_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125882_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125888_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125888_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:00.85 +68:33:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125890_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125890_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:16.53 +68:38:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125891_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125891_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:01.22 +68:15:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125892_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125892_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:43.49 +68:24:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125893_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125893_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:14.70 +71:15:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125894_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125894_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125895_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 125895_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:51.45 +65:59:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126594_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 126594_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126731_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 126731_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.16 +66:08:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126836_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 126836_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127620_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 127620_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:19.89 +66:10:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128389_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 128389_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:47.32 +70:51:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128735_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 128735_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128991_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 128991_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:01.56 +65:39:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129213_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 129213_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:02.52 +68:12:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129311_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 129311_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:07.96 +66:49:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129426_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 129426_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:34.12 +68:12:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129469_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 129469_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:50.77 +66:22:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129679_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 129679_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:40.74 +72:09:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129695_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 129695_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:06.13 +66:30:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129775_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 129775_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:32.96 +68:11:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129860_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 129860_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:14.58 +69:04:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129889_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 129889_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:31.12 +69:21:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130784_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 130784_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:54.05 +67:29:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130785_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 130785_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130797_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 130797_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131160_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 131160_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131493_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 131493_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:47.39 +72:59:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131901_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 131901_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132008_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 132008_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:45.42 +67:00:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132043_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 132043_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132240_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 132240_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:25.45 +71:17:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132376_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 132376_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132385_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 132385_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132391_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 132391_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:29.84 +69:54:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132507_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 132507_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:47.00 +71:41:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132509_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 132509_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132552_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 132552_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:17.70 +73:02:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132815_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 132815_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:06.18 +68:58:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132830_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 132830_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:40.20 +67:02:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132906_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 132906_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:27.11 +67:59:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133030_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 133030_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:41.36 +70:26:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133237_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 133237_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:22.10 +70:17:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133293_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 133293_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:11.56 +69:48:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133341_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 133341_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133359_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 133359_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:25.80 +69:50:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133372_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 133372_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:40.37 +66:48:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133512_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 133512_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:11.22 +69:51:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133637_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 133637_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:19.47 +69:15:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133661_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 133661_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:10.69 +72:02:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133724_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 133724_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:30.95 +68:42:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133725_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 133725_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:48.16 +71:16:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133796_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 133796_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:30.03 +68:00:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133955_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 133955_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134121_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 134121_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:53.55 +71:17:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134128_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 134128_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:24.19 +66:26:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134285_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 134285_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134337_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 134337_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134360_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 134360_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:10.74 +67:39:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134414_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 134414_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:53.90 +67:02:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134473_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 134473_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:34.07 +69:52:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134753_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 134753_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:13.65 +69:55:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134785_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 134785_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:01.60 +72:56:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135037_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 135037_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135047_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 135047_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135151_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 135151_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:09.49 +67:10:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135379_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 135379_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:46.37 +73:38:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135402_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 135402_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:25.64 +68:22:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135576_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 135576_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135587_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 135587_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136197_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 136197_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136391_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 136391_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136668_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 136668_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137166_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 137166_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:05.13 +72:18:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137273_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 137273_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137279_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 137279_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:04.21 +66:03:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137307_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 137307_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137353_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 137353_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:29.75 +71:07:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137429_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 137429_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:47.10 +72:21:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137605_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 137605_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:33.56 +72:12:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137606_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 137606_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:46.85 +67:59:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137647_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
Preparing report for the candidate 137647_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137761_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 137761_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:02.72 +69:15:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137846_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
Preparing report for the candidate 137846_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27106_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 27106_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:08.40 +71:22:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102269_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 102269_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23293_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 23293_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-09-28_02-21-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks