FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461083.75171413 12.02.2026 06:02:18.101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
First image: 2461083.75171413 12.02.2026 06:02:18.101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Last  image: 2461311.79133330 28.09.2026 06:59:21.197   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  12812
Objects passed selection criteria:  12759
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 9552.25
Average stars matched: 8971.75 (93.9229 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   237268 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Sep 28 02:01:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461083.75171413 12.02.2026 06:02:18.101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
First image: 2461083.75171413 12.02.2026 06:02:18.101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Last  image: 2461311.79133330 28.09.2026 06:59:21.197   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 100
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.10
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  77230
Objects passed selection criteria:  77030
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 59615.2
Average stars matched: 55874.8 (93.7256 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   558208 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Sep 28 02:02:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 866850 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 866850 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits_preview.png'

Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits


renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits_preview.png'

Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 661.6740
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 620.8029
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3353.4486
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 871.4910
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3351.1457
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 870.9922
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 5.06813
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 19.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T01:58:26.3437655' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T06:58:26.3437655' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61311.2905826736 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T06:58:36.2438651' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =      61311.290697257 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      89.874038915726 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     85.0166929395105 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     34.2869444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     5.98388888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =      1.7714917184371 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cam-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29514 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29514 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 12.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 62.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               901.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 19.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                228.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             6.800544 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits :)

Spent 0.525940 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 19.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-28T01:59:21.1973260' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T06:59:21.1973260' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61311.2912175581 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T06:59:31.0996168' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61311.2913321643 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     89.8740381827307 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     85.0166929448248 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     34.3066666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     5.98194444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =      1.7706033024086 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cam-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29514 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29514 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 12.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 62.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               901.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 19.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                228.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             6.800544 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits :)

Spent 0.553138 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits



fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.79069841
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:56:37.715 +85:00:13.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:56:37.715 +85:00:13.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0412 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:56:34.147 +85:00:01.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:56:34.147 +85:00:01.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0442 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  05:56:37.715 +85:00:13.43
Second-epoch second image center 05:56:34.147 +85:00:01.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00347 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uXGjfRDlpt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6BtFGm1k5B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YthAP535po
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits &> /tmp/tmp.37asr7I6uG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg
Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.843350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.843350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.45

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.45

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg
Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=6.0)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec +75.8292 to +89.9114 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec 75.8292 to 89.9114 deg
Loaded 33178 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7284 out of 7665 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7665 out of 12185 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
 2.1 pix  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
 15.4 mag.  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.6 (SNR )  11.5 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.uXGjfRDlpt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=848, bad_region=0, passed=12096
Got 12096 stars (including 11236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3580 through 0 to 179.5073, gap 179.5073 to 181.3580
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3577 through 0 to 179.5070, gap 179.5070 to 181.3577
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1173 n_q2=1016 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1455 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6BtFGm1k5B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=862, bad_region=0, passed=12185
Got 12185 stars (including 11310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0696 through 0 to 179.5067, gap 179.5067 to 180.0696
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0710 through 0 to 179.5079, gap 179.5079 to 180.0710
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.225 n_q1=1180 n_q2=1019 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1464 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YthAP535po (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=529, bad_region=0, passed=7095
Got 7095 stars (including 6559 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7095 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0300 through 0 to 179.9683, gap 179.9683 to 180.0300
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0245 through 0 to 179.9663, gap 179.9663 to 180.0245
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=13.596 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.609 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.609 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.739 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.739 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.302 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.406 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.406 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4908 robust_rms_before=0.910 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.302 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.420 worst_region_rms_after=0.406 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.992 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.406
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.420 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.420 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.296 arcsec matched=4908
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1434 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1284 n_q4=991 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.049
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.37asr7I6uG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=546, bad_region=0, passed=7040
Got 7040 stars (including 6489 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7040 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0295 through 0 to 179.9692, gap 179.9692 to 180.0295
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0250 through 0 to 179.9666, gap 179.9666 to 180.0250
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=13.602 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.672 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.672 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.455 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.758 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.758 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.305 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.381 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.381 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4909 robust_rms_before=0.921 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.302 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.305 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.399 worst_region_rms_after=0.381 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.961 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.381
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.399 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.399 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.302 arcsec matched=4909
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1433 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1284 n_q4=993 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.306
new1=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.049
new2=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.048
reference average sigma_overall=0.2635 worst_q_ratio=1.292
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
WARNING: the installed astorb.dat is only 24 bytes, far below the 30000000 bytes expected - it is incomplete and will be re-downloaded
######### Updating astorb.dat #########
### download command ###
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF
curl  --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --retry-delay 30 --speed-limit 100 --speed-time 30 --max-time 3600 --insecure --continue-at - --output astorb_dat_new.gz https://kirx.net/~kirx/vast_catalogs/astorb.dat.gz
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed  Time    Time    Time   Current
                                 Dload  Upload  Total   Spent   Left   Speed

  0      0   0      0   0      0      0      0                              0
  0 108.3M   0 429.6k   0      0 429.6k      0   04:18   00:01   04:17 429.6k
 15 108.3M  15 17.17M   0      0  8.58M      0   00:12   00:01   00:11  8.58M
 36 108.3M  36 39.30M   0      0 13.08M      0   00:08   00:03   00:05 13.08M
 57 108.3M  57 62.60M   0      0 15.64M      0   00:06   00:04   00:02 15.64M
 78 108.3M  78 85.33M   0      0 16.97M      0   00:06   00:05   00:01 16.97M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M   0      0 18.04M      0   00:06   00:06         16.97M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M   0      0 18.04M      0   00:06   00:06         16.97M
100 108.3M 100 108.3M   0      0 18.04M      0   00:06   00:06         16.97M
TMP_OUTPUT=astorb_dat_new
### UNPACK_COMMAND ###
We are currently at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF
Will run the unpack command: gunzip astorb_dat_new.gz
Unpack complete
Moved astorb_dat_new to astorb.dat
Successfully updated astorb.dat
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20973_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 20973_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    9.76    06:23:25.95 +80:04:16.2   5532 0270   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  06:23:25.93 +80:04:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    8.94    02:43:15.66 +81:08:12.5   0797 2580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  02:43:15.64 +81:08:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:56:37.715 +85:00:13.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:56:37.715 +85:00:13.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0412 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:56:34.147 +85:00:01.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:56:34.147 +85:00:01.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0442 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  05:56:37.715 +85:00:13.43
Second-epoch second image center 05:56:34.147 +85:00:01.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00347 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cYCw9Bij3K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aNFwnpgJJF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C5DGVzwA2c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits &> /tmp/tmp.13hcWvpron
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg
Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.714550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.714550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.61

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.61

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg
Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=4.6)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 75116 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec +75.7501 to +89.9630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec 75.7501 to 89.9630 deg
Loaded 33600 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6759 out of 7815 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7815 out of 75116 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 99 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 1.9 pix  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
 2.0 pix  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
 15.6 mag.  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.8 (SNR )  14.0 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cYCw9Bij3K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4540, bad_region=2, passed=75560
Got 75560 stars (including 70879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75560 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0704 through 0 to 179.9879, gap 179.9879 to 180.0704
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0705 through 0 to 179.9881, gap 179.9881 to 180.0705
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.227 n_q1=1150 n_q2=1043 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1444 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aNFwnpgJJF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4531, bad_region=0, passed=75103
Got 75103 stars (including 70436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75103 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0694 through 0 to 179.9961, gap 179.9961 to 180.0694
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0711 through 0 to 179.9966, gap 179.9966 to 180.0711
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.218 n_q1=1153 n_q2=1048 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1448 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.C5DGVzwA2c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1725, bad_region=16, passed=44406
Got 44406 stars (including 42595 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44406 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0244 through 0 to 179.9983, gap 179.9983 to 180.0244
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0119 through 0 to 179.9933, gap 179.9933 to 180.0119
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5410)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=13.309 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.907 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.907 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.477 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.752 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.752 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.405 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.405 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4919 robust_rms_before=0.903 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.419 worst_region_rms_after=0.405 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.996 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.405
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.419 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.296 arcsec matched=4919
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1455 n_q2=1182 n_q3=1290 n_q4=992 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.055
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.13hcWvpron (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1783, bad_region=14, passed=44815
Got 44815 stars (including 42950 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44815 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0030 through 0 to 179.9944, gap 179.9944 to 180.0030
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0250 through 0 to 179.9901, gap 179.9901 to 180.0250
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=13.165 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.147 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.147 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.453 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.793 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.793 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.301 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.381 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.381 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4919 robust_rms_before=0.910 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.298 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.301 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.394 worst_region_rms_after=0.381 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.971 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.381
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.394 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.394 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.298 arcsec matched=4919
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1448 n_q2=1177 n_q3=1305 n_q4=989 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.034
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:43:38.43 +80:44:45.3:  13.36 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:01:26.28 +81:35:23.2:  13.45 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:49:10.83 +83:09:32.7:  13.58 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 06:07:02.73 +82:20:59.7:  14.26 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:54:46.38 +81:38:28.5:  12.84 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:09:39.31 +83:34:31.4:  12.53 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:19:06.93 +81:03:07.3:  12.83 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:29:02.63 +84:16:44.8:  12.61 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 06:07:02.73 +82:20:59.7:  14.17 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:43:38.43 +80:44:45.3:  13.38 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:01:26.28 +81:35:23.2:  13.46 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:49:10.83 +83:09:32.7:  13.51 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:02.73 +82:20:59.7: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3160 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:38.43 +80:44:45.3: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5965 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:49:10.83 +83:09:32.7: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6386 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:01:26.28 +81:35:23.2: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7454 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:54:46.38 +81:38:28.5:  12.82 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:09:39.31 +83:34:31.4:  12.55 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:46.38 +81:38:28.5: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2095 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:19:06.93 +81:03:07.3:  12.75 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:09:39.31 +83:34:31.4: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8117 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:19:06.93 +81:03:07.3: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9733 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:29:02.63 +84:16:44.8:  12.54 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:02.63 +84:16:44.8: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8921 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:56:31.60 +80:59:29.7:  12.18 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:13:28.47 +84:02:25.1:  12.48 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:16:17.95 +81:01:52.5:  12.83 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:01:29.62 +84:21:57.4:  12.78 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:05:19.36 +83:28:00.7:  13.16 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:56:31.60 +80:59:29.7:  12.15 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:31.60 +80:59:29.7: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3988 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:09:20.38 +85:35:57.9:  12.92 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:13:28.47 +84:02:25.1:  12.50 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:28.47 +84:02:25.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7328 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:01:29.62 +84:21:57.4:  12.78 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:16:17.95 +81:01:52.5:  12.78 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:01:29.62 +84:21:57.4: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9634 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:17.95 +81:01:52.5: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9877 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:05:19.36 +83:28:00.7:  13.09 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:19.36 +83:28:00.7: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0666 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:09:20.38 +85:35:57.9:  12.91 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:20.38 +85:35:57.9: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9124 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:17:37.50 +84:13:32.4:  13.11 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 09:36:27.66 +81:21:18.5:  13.09 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:39:25.87 +82:29:55.9:  13.17 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:48:15.40 +81:52:39.2:  13.44 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:51:52.28 +86:16:01.4:  13.53 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:17:37.50 +84:13:32.4:  13.14 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:16:55.28 +84:11:26.9:  13.33 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:37.50 +84:13:32.4: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1710 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:39:25.87 +82:29:55.9:  13.17 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 09:36:27.66 +81:21:18.5:  13.02 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:25.87 +82:29:55.9: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2034 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:27.66 +81:21:18.5: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0490 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:48:15.40 +81:52:39.2:  13.41 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:48:15.40 +81:52:39.2: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4827 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:51:52.28 +86:16:01.4:  13.49 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:52.28 +86:16:01.4: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4735 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:16:55.28 +84:11:26.9:  13.38 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:55.28 +84:11:26.9: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3790 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:47:59.96 +80:54:23.6:  13.78 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:51:15.03 +86:01:08.4:  13.84 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:22:28.66 +83:23:53.3:  13.66 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:12:22.66 +87:11:02.5:  13.84 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:09:07.74 +85:10:45.9:  13.84 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:47:59.96 +80:54:23.6:  13.68 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:59.96 +80:54:23.6: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7917 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:04:28.26 +81:52:02.6:  13.98 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 08:50:30.02 +87:32:32.5:  13.66 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:51:15.03 +86:01:08.4:  13.79 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:51:15.03 +86:01:08.4: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7656 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:22:28.66 +83:23:53.3:  13.55 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:28.66 +83:23:53.3: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8213 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:48:00.39 +85:12:37.8:  13.74 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:12:22.66 +87:11:02.5:  13.80 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:22.66 +87:11:02.5: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7441 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:09:07.74 +85:10:45.9:  13.74 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:07.74 +85:10:45.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7495 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 06:37:51.39 +85:21:18.3:  13.92 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:04:28.26 +81:52:02.6:  14.01 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 08:50:30.02 +87:32:32.5:  13.67 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:28.26 +81:52:02.6: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9434 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:50:30.02 +87:32:32.5: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7041 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:48:00.39 +85:12:37.8:  13.83 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:00.39 +85:12:37.8: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8351 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:54:50.63 +83:46:13.6:  13.89 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 06:37:51.39 +85:21:18.3:  13.84 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:51.39 +85:21:18.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8875 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:46:58.83 +81:46:31.7:  13.77 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:54:50.63 +83:46:13.6:  13.79 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:54:50.63 +83:46:13.6: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8758 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:14:54.64 +84:21:30.7:  15.02 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:46:58.83 +81:46:31.7:  13.73 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:58.83 +81:46:31.7: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8952 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:14:54.64 +84:21:30.7:  15.18 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:14:54.64 +84:21:30.7: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4244 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91163_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91163_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    14.31    06:07:02.42 +82:20:59.9   5022 1605   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    14.32    06:07:03.04 +82:20:59.6   5023 1607   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91173_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91173_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    14.01    03:14:58.55 +82:28:46.8   1860 2704   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  03:14:59.42 +82:28:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91174_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91174_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.77    02:01:26.63 +81:35:22.8   0429 3500   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.73    02:01:25.92 +81:35:23.6   0429 3502   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91175_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91175_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.69    04:13:27.31 +82:33:13.6   2858 2134   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  04:13:27.26 +82:33:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91177_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91177_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.59    04:43:38.22 +80:44:45.4   3082 0877   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.60    04:43:38.65 +80:44:45.2   3083 0879   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91178_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91178_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.63    01:49:11.13 +83:09:33.3   1126 4199   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.65    01:49:10.52 +83:09:32.1   1126 4201   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91180_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91180_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.57    01:37:44.21 +81:29:13.2   0109 3933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  01:37:44.15 +81:29:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91182_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91182_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.37    01:19:03.40 +82:11:57.4   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91184_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91184_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.38    00:32:36.25 +83:23:24.5   0790 5528   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  00:32:35.98 +83:23:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91185_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91185_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.26    02:29:03.86 +82:12:43.1   1087 3243   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  02:29:03.91 +82:12:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91187_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91187_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.23    03:54:46.54 +81:38:28.5   2259 1818   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.19    03:54:46.23 +81:38:28.6   2260 1819   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91188_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91188_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.07    04:29:02.18 +84:16:44.9   3510 2987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.80    04:29:03.07 +84:16:44.7   3511 2988   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91189_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91189_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.91    04:57:00.46 +81:33:34.7   3515 1270   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  04:57:00.38 +81:33:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91190_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91190_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    12.90    02:09:39.58 +83:34:31.8   1532 4027   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.75    02:09:39.04 +83:34:31.1   1532 4028   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91191_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91191_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    12.90    03:19:06.71 +81:03:07.0   1383 1972   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.07    03:19:07.15 +81:03:07.7   1384 1973   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91785_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91785_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    10.88    00:53:32.60 +82:59:47.1   0641 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91789_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91789_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    10.89    02:03:41.67 +80:56:44.6   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91936_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 91936_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    11.06    04:42:08.18 +86:08:00.6   4035 3987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92529_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 92529_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    11.73    05:27:50.24 +82:42:18.4   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92887_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 92887_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    11.99    06:06:24.40 +80:39:04.1   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93231_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 93231_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.11    08:35:42.93 +80:14:33.7   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93242_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 93242_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.30    06:42:34.18 +82:21:22.6   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93308_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 93308_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.23    07:30:18.21 +80:21:10.0   7134 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93386_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 93386_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    12.39    04:56:31.64 +80:59:29.8   3420 0937   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.41    04:56:31.57 +80:59:29.6   3421 0939   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93874_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 93874_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.50    06:03:31.04 +82:11:07.8   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94017_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 94017_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.42    08:17:36.01 +80:18:52.8   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94044_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 94044_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.71    01:59:02.99 +83:41:17.5   1492 4215   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94073_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 94073_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    12.74    03:13:28.70 +84:02:25.1   2441 3447   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.73    03:13:28.24 +84:02:25.1   2441 3448   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94145_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 94145_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.81    02:46:17.32 +82:48:51.9   1589 3229   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  02:46:17.25 +82:48:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94187_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 94187_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.63    23:23:22.94 +89:35:04.8   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94218_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 94218_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.79    04:10:45.92 +80:41:31.9   2324 1138   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  04:10:45.62 +80:41:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94437_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 94437_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    12.98    03:16:18.12 +81:01:51.9   1323 2003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.99    03:16:17.77 +81:01:53.0   1324 2005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94479_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 94479_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.84    07:29:48.07 +82:24:02.8   6614 2027   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  07:29:48.16 +82:24:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94643_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 94643_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.83    05:55:07.86 +79:53:39.3   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94799_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 94799_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.06    02:01:29.18 +84:21:57.8   1861 4398   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.89    02:01:30.07 +84:21:57.0   1862 4399   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94820_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 94820_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.00    05:05:19.14 +83:28:00.9   3931 2354   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.16    05:05:19.58 +83:28:00.5   3932 2356   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94897_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 94897_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.13    00:27:20.07 +86:54:59.9   2899 5936   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  00:27:20.75 +86:55:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94949_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 94949_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.01    02:49:45.32 +81:13:24.2   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94983_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 94983_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.01    07:09:20.45 +85:35:57.6   5606 3698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    12.85    07:09:20.31 +85:35:58.1   5607 3700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95023_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95023_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.03    02:18:40.30 +89:17:33.1   4399 5959   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  02:18:19.42 +89:17:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95105_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95105_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.04    06:22:52.16 +80:02:16.0   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95138_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95138_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.18    04:27:23.66 +80:51:10.7   2734 1069   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  04:27:23.63 +80:51:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95185_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95185_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.14    05:07:13.74 +80:47:42.5   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95188_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95188_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.17    05:19:00.94 +81:13:19.9   3963 0974   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  05:19:00.93 +81:13:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95282_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95282_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.20    04:03:05.19 +81:13:03.8   2303 1505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  04:03:05.24 +81:13:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95313_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95313_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.44    02:36:36.92 +81:39:20.9   0932 2903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  02:36:37.57 +81:39:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95325_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95325_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.16    08:26:50.71 +79:12:08.0   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95353_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95353_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.53    01:25:20.66 +81:48:29.6   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95386_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95386_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.08    03:22:44.16 +87:26:12.0   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95389_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95389_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.20    05:17:37.43 +84:13:32.4   4208 2768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.15    05:17:37.57 +84:13:32.4   4209 2770   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95394_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95394_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.04    09:36:27.51 +81:21:17.6   9071 3264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.06    09:36:27.82 +81:21:19.5   9071 3267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95439_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95439_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.24    04:39:26.07 +82:29:56.2   3319 1915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.17    04:39:25.66 +82:29:55.5   3320 1917   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95525_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95525_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.19    03:53:53.54 +87:34:03.3   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95672_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95672_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.40    01:04:38.35 +82:13:20.3   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95835_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95835_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.45    02:48:15.36 +81:52:39.0   1203 2807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.52    02:48:15.44 +81:52:39.4   1204 2808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95856_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95856_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.45    00:37:11.87 +83:20:14.9   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95869_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 95869_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.53    23:45:18.88 +88:51:23.2   4052 6238   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  23:45:15.73 +88:51:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96225_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 96225_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.48    01:51:51.35 +86:16:01.2   2786 5091   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.47    01:51:53.20 +86:16:01.6   2786 5093   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96229_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 96229_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.40    02:36:42.62 +89:12:59.0   4385 5902   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  02:36:40.78 +89:12:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96291_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 96291_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.57    04:08:39.96 +86:38:22.7   3853 4388   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  04:08:40.42 +86:38:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96357_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 96357_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.48    05:16:55.20 +84:11:27.2   4194 2749   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.31    05:16:55.36 +84:11:26.5   4195 2751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96609_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 96609_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.76    03:02:15.64 +81:06:47.5   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96614_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 96614_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.69    02:55:07.87 +82:23:40.0   1529 2928   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  02:55:07.87 +82:23:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96659_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 96659_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.59    02:59:25.64 +85:11:50.3   2755 4102   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  02:59:26.43 +85:11:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96735_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 96735_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.61    02:54:33.11 +82:06:41.6   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96778_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 96778_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.58    04:00:38.76 +86:24:30.7   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96917_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 96917_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.61    05:45:48.55 +80:23:20.9   4560 0414   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  05:45:48.24 +80:23:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96925_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 96925_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.50    07:15:07.06 +79:19:57.2   6995 0170   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  07:15:06.82 +79:19:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96978_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 96978_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.72    03:48:00.19 +80:54:23.8   1899 1511   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.90    03:47:59.73 +80:54:23.4   1900 1512   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97034_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 97034_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.79    02:17:47.26 +81:46:54.2   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97063_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 97063_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.77    00:51:13.00 +86:01:08.6   2413 5607   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.76    00:51:17.06 +86:01:08.2   2413 5608   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97151_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 97151_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.79    00:22:28.48 +83:23:53.8   0766 5703   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.85    00:22:28.84 +83:23:52.8   0766 5704   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97214_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 97214_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.39    09:02:30.45 +80:10:48.1   9112 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97258_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 97258_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.74    04:09:07.84 +85:10:46.2   3473 3593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.76    04:09:07.64 +85:10:45.7   3473 3595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97421_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 97421_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.36    09:46:19.66 +81:28:36.9   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97447_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 97447_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.74    03:12:21.54 +87:11:01.3   3648 4909   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.75    03:12:23.77 +87:11:03.7   3649 4910   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97561_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 97561_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.98    01:49:41.01 +81:41:40.1   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97653_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 97653_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.80    08:16:24.54 +84:04:38.2   6829 3310   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  08:16:24.99 +84:04:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97708_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 97708_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.75    08:50:27.51 +87:32:32.6   5778 5146   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.67    08:50:32.52 +87:32:32.4   5779 5149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97831_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 97831_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.90    04:04:28.15 +81:52:03.4   2510 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    14.00    04:04:28.36 +81:52:01.9   2511 1841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97835_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 97835_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.84    04:48:00.20 +85:12:37.9   3936 3434   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.83    04:48:00.59 +85:12:37.7   3937 3436   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97887_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 97887_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.66    09:28:25.43 +83:16:13.0   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97940_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 97940_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.81    06:37:50.61 +85:21:16.3   5284 3459   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.99    06:37:52.18 +85:21:20.2   5285 3461   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98079_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 98079_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.92    02:03:22.86 +81:05:13.0   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98145_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 98145_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.80    04:49:35.34 +80:34:24.4   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98168_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 98168_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.94    01:54:49.54 +83:46:14.7   1498 4299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.84    01:54:51.72 +83:46:12.5   1498 4300   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98209_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 98209_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.93    02:27:24.63 +84:45:48.8   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98256_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 98256_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.60    08:26:26.93 +88:38:42.2   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98290_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 98290_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    13.92    04:46:59.03 +81:46:32.1   3337 1452   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.88    04:46:58.64 +81:46:31.3   3338 1453   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98903_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 98903_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    14.04    01:13:13.10 +87:12:30.7   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99068_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 99068_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    14.33    06:14:24.82 +82:34:15.8   5158 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99131_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 99131_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    14.08    09:07:37.41 +80:16:16.7   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99199_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 99199_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    14.15    06:35:28.07 +82:17:20.3   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99557_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 99557_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    13.83    07:54:00.24 +81:04:06.0   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99572_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 99572_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 09 28.29070    2461311.79070    14.42    02:14:55.19 +84:21:32.1   1970 4230   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-58-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    14.43    02:14:54.09 +84:21:29.3   1970 4231   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99673_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 99673_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    14.24    05:07:33.62 +81:27:02.7   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99734_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 99734_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    14.77    05:44:00.67 +86:37:52.3   4663 4178   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    9.85    06:23:25.96 +80:04:16.2   5532 0270   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  06:23:25.93 +80:04:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 09 28.29133    2461311.79133    9.12    02:43:15.70 +81:08:12.5   0797 2580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-28_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020013_TTUQ1b1x1_1649008_B8rdhbmF/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-28_01-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

**** FOUND  02:43:15.68 +81:08:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.79069841 -observatory V36
13:36:46.02 -11:35:43.8 Mercury (-0.1mag)
14:11:43.32 -20:28:49.6 Venus (-4.8mag)
08:08:27.59 +21:09:06.4 Mars (1.1mag)
09:25:22.71 +15:46:17.2 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:46:13.12 +02:01:08.9 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:09.89 +21:00:41.9 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:11:39.49 -00:17:06.3 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:28.96 -23:42:58.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
01:27:35.13 +13:24:03.8 Moon (-12.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 28 02:01 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.79069841:
09:25:29.75 +15:45:40.5 Io (9.4mag)
09:25:24.15 +15:46:11.3 Europa (6.3mag)
09:25:37.47 +15:44:58.7 Ganymede (7.9mag)
09:25:33.54 +15:45:21.3 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:24:12.04 +16:08:14.8 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:25:26.15 +15:46:00.5 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:23:24.82 +16:04:21.4 Elara (17.6mag)
09:28:32.01 +15:09:28.8 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:24:55.84 +16:09:53.7 Carme (18.9mag)
00:46:01.71 +02:00:51.8 Titan (8.2mag)
00:46:13.52 +02:01:10.3 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:45:36.49 +01:59:50.9 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:46:26.73 +02:00:34.0 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:44:40.85 +01:49:19.5 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 28 02:01 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.79069841:
01:08:15.44 +18:33:42.6 JWST
17:21:18.59 +37:22:37.6 Chandra
06:22:35.38 +19:33:59.3 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 28 02:01 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.79069841 -observatory V36
03:47:34.11 +20:02:34.3 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:14:11.96 -33:47:32.4 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:33:26.81 -71:33:14.9 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:43.33 +34:16:22.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:06:16.42 +47:48:41.4 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
21:58:24.53 +25:50:49.3 17.6mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:24:01.26 +25:37:17.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
11:08:30.27 +26:35:34.2 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
10:01:24.22 +05:07:12.2 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:12.49 -17:28:23.4 15.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:54:32.29 +34:25:10.8 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:10:49.60 +15:07:57.0 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:25:59.59 +42:10:04.9 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:01:22.14 +47:36:50.1 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:44:05.09 -13:22:55.1 14.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
11:53:20.69 +17:04:36.5 16.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:38:11.71 -01:37:13.8 16.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:50:12.63 +69:35:07.8 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:50:03.17 +44:51:01.3 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:33:05.00 +13:02:05.9 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:44:40.17 -34:05:48.4 14.0mag 10P/Tempel
01:51:49.33 +39:37:52.7 17.1mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:02:22.91 -07:06:09.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:50:49.79 -11:33:31.6 17.9mag 63P/Wild
07:16:34.37 +17:22:33.2 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:10:59.31 +14:50:25.8 16.9mag 88P/Howell
06:51:13.45 +36:11:51.5 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:30:19.72 +18:38:49.3 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:13:38.90 +16:14:52.0 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:34:39.05 -28:18:05.6 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos
06:40:04.47 +19:52:06.6 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:56:56.04 -08:58:12.0 13.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:47:50.15 +05:03:04.4 13.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:33:07.49 +06:15:37.9 14.7mag 220P/McNaught
05:39:24.78 +42:10:16.3 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
09:42:16.15 +32:30:00.4 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Sep 28 02:01 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40  ASASSN-26fg  2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40  SN2026aajs  2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70  AT2026acgs  2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10  ASASSN-26ff  2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20  SN2026yjv  2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10  V8055  2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 28 02:01 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6  PNV J00421393+4116356  2026-09-22.6597  19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5  TCP J18140158+1513555  2026-09-24.4645  14.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Sep 28 02:01 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
01:57:55.362 -22:31:24.48  AT 2026aaxw  2026-08-31.66 19.65
01:52:55.402 -09:12:08.29  AT 2026aaxv  2026-09-04.64 20.08
05:04:14.730 -42:14:07.54  AT 2026aaxu  2026-09-03.80 19.73
00:02:28.077 -23:32:16.72  AT 2026aaxt  2026-09-04.59 20.16
01:03:33.302 -33:27:15.30  AT 2026aaxs  2026-08-22.73 20.13
02:42:04.255 -11:07:39.46  AT 2026aaxr  2026-09-03.17 19.67
02:31:19.833 -25:27:29.88  SN 2026aaxq  2026-09-06.65 20.16
00:52:57.241 -59:43:14.89  AT 2026aaxp  2026-09-06.70 19.51
01:20:22.758 -62:39:05.68  AT 2026aaxo  2026-09-06.70 20.13
00:14:01.541 -00:00:55.27  AT 2026aaxn  2026-09-08.53 19.62
04:14:33.098 -37:43:12.21  AT 2026aaxm  2026-08-22.80 20.49
19:48:31.105 -23:12:17.17  AT 2026aaxl  2026-09-04.43 20.19
00:38:15.294 -37:17:09.43  AT 2026aaxk  2026-09-04.60 20.02
21:01:01.181 -13:41:08.56  SN 2026aaxj  2026-09-08.41 19.99
22:54:22.028 -56:22:37.05  AT 2026aaxi  2026-09-08.58 20.16
01:42:07.146 -40:01:01.18  AT 2026aaxh  2026-09-04.64 20.37
21:44:13.978 -09:13:15.35  AT 2026aaxg  2026-09-08.45 20.21
02:32:42.330 -42:59:32.85  AT 2026aaxf  2026-09-04.67 20.08
23:28:33.837 -17:12:39.07  AT 2026aaxe  2026-09-04.48 20.3
23:27:55.166 -08:22:08.81  AT 2026aaxd  2026-09-04.50 20.02
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 28 02:01 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Mon Sep 28 02:01:07 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 29s (0.48 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 5s (0.08 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 10s (0.17 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 53s (0.88 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 12 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 4 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 4 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 25s (0.42 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 20s (0.33 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 2s (0.03 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 5s (0.08 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 54s (0.90 min)
FIELD_Cam-01-Q1b1x1: 121s (2.02 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 136s (2.27 min)
Finished: Mon Sep 28 02:03:23 CDT 2026