######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.china-vo.org
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.china-vo.org)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Boo-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Boo-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Boo-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 811860 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 811860 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits_preview.png'
Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits

renamed 'Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits_preview.png'
Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 392.6993
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 457.7419
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4432.4774
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1076.2959
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4503.6924
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1128.5854
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 11.2872
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.046
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-27T22:26:25.2818720' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T03:26:25.2818720' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61311.1433481597 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T03:26:35.1862063' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61311.1434628009 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 229.089048968191 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 38.000085367969 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.8383333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 301.885555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.67192832629503 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Boo-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 16 22' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29541 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29541 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 53.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 265.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/d_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits :)
Spent 0.488129 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/d_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-27T22:27:26.1517176' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-28T03:27:26.1517176' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61311.1440526736 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-28T03:27:36.0527131' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61311.1441672686 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 229.089049029524 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 38.000085392705 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.6602777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 301.981388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.69251483431092 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Boo-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 16 22' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29541 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29541 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 53.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 265.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/d_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits :)
Spent 0.494035 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/d_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits

fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461311.64346390
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:16:21.054 +38:00:10.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:16:20.676 +37:59:16.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:16:21.054 +38:00:10.22
Second-epoch image center 15:16:20.676 +37:59:16.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0150 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:16:23.576 +37:58:46.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:16:21.054 +38:00:10.22
Second-epoch image center 15:16:23.576 +37:58:46.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0247 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:16:20.676 +37:59:16.37
Second-epoch second image center 15:16:23.576 +37:58:46.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01263 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bh4cUnPgOY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2XofOYmE9V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YEaSE2sV18
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1h6N3qhQo8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7247 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5595 to 239.7201 deg, Dec +32.4775 to +43.2473 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5595 to 239.7201 deg, Dec 32.4775 to 43.2473 deg
Loaded 5046 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3886 out of 3991 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3991 out of 7247 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.762200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.762200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7247 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5595 to 239.7201 deg, Dec +32.4775 to +43.2473 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5595 to 239.7201 deg, Dec 32.4775 to 43.2473 deg
Loaded 5046 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3886 out of 3991 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3991 out of 7247 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 7228 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5592 to 239.7200 deg, Dec +32.4775 to +43.2473 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5592 to 239.7200 deg, Dec 32.4775 to 43.2473 deg
Loaded 5046 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3878 out of 3985 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3985 out of 7228 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.3 pix Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.2 pix fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
2.2 pix fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
15.6 mag. Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.bh4cUnPgOY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=0, passed=7247
Got 7247 stars (including 6881 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7247 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.5 to 43.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.5 to 43.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=1275 n_q2=1189 n_q3=1230 n_q4=1218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2XofOYmE9V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=362, bad_region=0, passed=7228
Got 7228 stars (including 6859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7228 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.5 to 43.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.5 to 43.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1193 n_q3=1240 n_q4=1206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YEaSE2sV18 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=254, bad_region=0, passed=2555
Got 2555 stars (including 2296 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2555 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2252 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2251 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2251 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2252 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2251 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2251 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 2251 stars left (next iteration limit 2476)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2251 robust_rms=12.967 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.470 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.470 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2251 robust_rms=0.601 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.724 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.724 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2251 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.417 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.362 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2251 robust_rms_before=0.845 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.376 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.402 worst_region_rms_after=0.417 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.839 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.362
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.402 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.402 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.364 arcsec matched=2251
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits N_match=2251 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=608 n_q2=501 n_q3=635 n_q4=507 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1h6N3qhQo8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=256, bad_region=0, passed=2490
Got 2490 stars (including 2230 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2490 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2190 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2189 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2189 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2190 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2189 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2189 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 2189 stars left (next iteration limit 2407)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2189 robust_rms=12.867 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.541 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.541 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2189 robust_rms=0.620 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.777 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.777 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2189 robust_rms=0.395 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.463 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.353 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2189 robust_rms_before=0.872 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.369 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.395 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.460 worst_region_rms_after=0.463 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.837 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.353
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.460 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.460 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.369 arcsec matched=2189
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits N_match=2189 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.359 n_q1=600 n_q2=487 n_q3=619 n_q4=483 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.093
ref2=Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.188
new1=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.093
new2=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.174
reference average sigma_overall=0.3615 worst_q_ratio=1.1405
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210_astrometric_residuals.png (4910 matched stars from wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090_astrometric_residuals.png (2251 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091_astrometric_residuals.png (2189 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:16:21.054 +38:00:10.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:16:20.676 +37:59:16.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:16:21.054 +38:00:10.22
Second-epoch image center 15:16:20.676 +37:59:16.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0150 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:16:23.576 +37:58:46.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:16:21.054 +38:00:10.22
Second-epoch image center 15:16:23.576 +37:58:46.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0247 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:16:20.676 +37:59:16.37
Second-epoch second image center 15:16:23.576 +37:58:46.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01263 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.78iM4zD9YA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O6W2cF7XhP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bb4XmBtZdf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tyS5tpmMpO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 37766 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5378 to 239.7266 deg, Dec +32.4318 to +43.2635 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5378 to 239.7266 deg, Dec 32.4318 to 43.2635 deg
Loaded 5083 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3713 out of 3999 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3999 out of 37766 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.640600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.640600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.87
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.77
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.77
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 37766 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5378 to 239.7266 deg, Dec +32.4318 to +43.2635 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5378 to 239.7266 deg, Dec 32.4318 to 43.2635 deg
Loaded 5083 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3713 out of 3999 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3999 out of 37766 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 37709 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5367 to 239.7267 deg, Dec +32.4317 to +43.2624 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5367 to 239.7267 deg, Dec 32.4317 to 43.2624 deg
Loaded 5083 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3696 out of 3997 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3997 out of 37709 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 18 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.2 pix Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
1.9 pix fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
1.9 pix fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
15.8 mag. Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.78iM4zD9YA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1649, bad_region=0, passed=37758
Got 37758 stars (including 36059 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37758 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=1300 n_q2=1163 n_q3=1231 n_q4=1217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.O6W2cF7XhP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1594, bad_region=0, passed=37697
Got 37697 stars (including 36048 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37697 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1298 n_q2=1157 n_q3=1231 n_q4=1225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Bb4XmBtZdf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=498, bad_region=2, passed=17837
Got 17837 stars (including 17303 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17837 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=12.696 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.464 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.464 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.623 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.793 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.793 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.421 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.453 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.419 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=0.868 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.400 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.421 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.434 worst_region_rms_after=0.453 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.888 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.419
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.434 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.434 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.400 arcsec matched=4897
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1415 n_q2=1128 n_q3=1337 n_q4=1017 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tyS5tpmMpO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=488, bad_region=2, passed=17614
Got 17614 stars (including 17095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17614 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17614 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17614 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17614 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=12.739 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.049 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.049 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.645 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.841 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.841 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.476 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.402 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=0.900 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.402 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.436 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.464 worst_region_rms_after=0.476 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.922 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.402
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.464 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.464 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.402 arcsec matched=4898
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1440 n_q2=1103 n_q3=1332 n_q4=1023 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/wcs_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 14:39:24.18 +42:05:26.2: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 14:45:00.41 +41:10:09.5: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 15:10:14.22 +43:06:28.8: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 15:02:26.39 +33:17:36.6: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 14:40:26.81 +40:42:41.5: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 14:37:52.60 +38:50:48.4: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 15:34:44.61 +42:42:56.8: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 14:53:21.77 +40:48:59.6: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 15:10:14.22 +43:06:28.8: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 15:02:26.39 +33:17:36.6: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 15:34:44.61 +42:42:56.8: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 14:37:52.60 +38:50:48.4: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 14:40:26.81 +40:42:41.5: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 14:39:24.18 +42:05:26.2: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 14:45:00.41 +41:10:09.5: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:14.22 +43:06:28.8: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6611 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:26.39 +33:17:36.6: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7095 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:44.61 +42:42:56.8: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4081 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:24.18 +42:05:26.2: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1989 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:26.81 +40:42:41.5: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2674 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:52.60 +38:50:48.4: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5695 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:00.41 +41:10:09.5: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3713 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 14:53:21.77 +40:48:59.6: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:21.77 +40:48:59.6: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8834 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-39-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 15:15:57.78 +41:09:15.4: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-40-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 15:15:57.78 +41:09:15.4: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:15:57.78 +41:09:15.4: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7914 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52714_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 52714_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.14346 | 2461311.64346 | 13.67 | 15:10:14.20 +43:06:28.1 | 5662 0147 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 13.66 | 15:10:14.24 +43:06:29.5 | 5668 0142 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52716_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 52716_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.14346 | 2461311.64346 | 13.35 | 14:45:00.42 +41:10:09.0 | 8482 1346 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 13.41 | 14:45:00.40 +41:10:09.9 | 8488 1340 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52718_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 52718_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.14346 | 2461311.64346 | 13.41 | 15:34:44.59 +42:42:56.4 | 2939 0160 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 13.41 | 15:34:44.62 +42:42:57.1 | 2945 0155 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52719_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 52719_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.14346 | 2461311.64346 | 13.16 | 14:39:24.12 +42:05:25.5 | 9111 0760 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 13.26 | 14:39:24.23 +42:05:26.8 | 9117 0755 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 52723_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 12.13 | 15:03:16.05 +42:32:26.4 | 6427 0513 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 15:03:16.08 +42:32:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52724_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 52724_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 12.22 | 15:33:28.87 +42:44:54.8 | 3087 0152 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 15:33:28.88 +42:44:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52931_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 52931_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.14346 | 2461311.64346 | 12.27 | 14:40:26.81 +40:42:41.4 | 9017 1606 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 12.27 | 14:40:26.81 +40:42:41.6 | 9023 1601 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52975_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 52975_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.14346 | 2461311.64346 | 12.52 | 14:37:52.58 +38:50:48.4 | 9359 2727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 12.64 | 14:37:52.62 +38:50:48.4 | 9365 2722 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52981_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 52981_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 12.93 | 15:51:21.89 +35:40:21.7 | 0421 4117 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 15:51:21.89 +35:40:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52998_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 52998_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.14346 | 2461311.64346 | 12.65 | 15:02:26.42 +33:17:37.4 | 6358 6105 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 12.81 | 15:02:26.36 +33:17:35.9 | 6364 6101 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53013_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53013_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 13.08 | 15:41:35.85 +38:32:56.3 | 1853 2561 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 15:41:35.84 +38:32:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53015_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53015_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.14346 | 2461311.64346 | 12.86 | 14:53:21.86 +40:48:59.9 | 7522 1575 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 12.92 | 14:53:21.68 +40:48:59.2 | 7529 1570 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53050_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53050_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 13.14 | 15:40:41.64 +38:41:49.4 | 1971 2486 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 15:40:41.67 +38:41:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53065_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53065_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 13.18 | 15:43:53.03 +35:26:14.1 | 1322 4391 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 15:43:53.01 +35:26:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53088_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53088_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 13.22 | 15:17:53.20 +33:37:02.3 | 4430 5809 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 15:17:53.15 +33:37:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53256_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53256_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 28.14346 | 2461311.64346 | 13.85 | 15:15:57.81 +41:09:15.8 | 4956 1294 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-26-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 13.75 | 15:15:57.74 +41:09:15.0 | 4962 1290 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30538_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 30538_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 10.64 | 15:48:24.64 +34:07:16.5 | 0641 5106 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11416_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 11416_fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 28.14417 | 2461311.64417 | 8.29 | 15:49:31.10 +39:34:17.2 | 1013 1813 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_222828_TTUQ1b1x1_1175720_sBJ5Vu6z/fd_Boo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_22-27-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 15:49:31.12 +39:34:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Boo-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.64346390 -observatory V36
13:36:01.04 -11:30:18.1 Mercury (-0.1mag)
14:11:37.21 -20:27:30.6 Venus (-4.8mag)
08:08:05.44 +21:10:02.6 Mars (1.1mag)
09:25:16.22 +15:46:46.0 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:46:15.68 +02:01:25.4 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:10.42 +21:00:43.1 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:11:40.39 -00:17:00.4 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:29.29 -23:42:57.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
01:22:09.77 +12:25:23.4 Moon (-12.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 27 22:30 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.64346390:
09:25:23.36 +15:46:08.9 Io (9.3mag)
09:25:20.24 +15:46:26.3 Europa (6.3mag)
09:25:31.94 +15:45:22.5 Ganymede (7.9mag)
09:25:25.59 +15:45:57.7 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:24:04.98 +16:08:43.2 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:25:19.69 +15:46:29.1 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:23:18.01 +16:04:47.4 Elara (17.6mag)
09:28:25.94 +15:09:58.4 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:24:50.00 +16:10:20.0 Carme (18.9mag)
00:46:03.79 +02:01:09.9 Titan (8.2mag)
00:46:17.16 +02:01:24.9 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:45:39.21 +02:00:09.1 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:46:28.95 +02:00:49.7 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:44:43.52 +01:49:36.5 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 27 22:30 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461311.64346390:
01:07:41.71 +18:26:55.7 JWST
17:07:00.81 +41:30:47.6 Chandra
03:27:53.84 +59:06:22.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 27 22:30 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461311.64346390 -observatory V36
03:47:33.54 +20:02:22.4 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:14:05.75 -33:47:44.6 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:33:21.76 -71:32:41.0 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:43.49 +34:16:06.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:06:17.09 +47:47:52.9 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
21:58:30.10 +25:52:05.5 17.6mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:23:56.35 +25:37:24.8 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
11:08:22.40 +26:35:46.7 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
10:01:19.11 +05:07:14.5 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:12.20 -17:27:38.2 15.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:54:26.42 +34:24:25.1 16.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:10:47.19 +15:07:59.9 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:26:00.53 +42:10:33.5 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:01:30.78 +47:37:44.8 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:44:02.74 -13:22:45.2 14.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
11:53:05.01 +17:05:20.3 16.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:38:03.32 -01:36:29.3 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:49:39.05 +69:37:36.6 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:50:11.87 +44:51:50.4 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:32:56.45 +13:01:19.4 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:44:32.38 -34:07:02.8 14.0mag 10P/Tempel
01:51:36.74 +39:37:36.1 17.1mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:02:16.85 -07:05:26.9 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:50:31.88 -11:30:53.9 17.9mag 63P/Wild
07:16:20.13 +17:23:25.6 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:11:05.15 +14:50:39.1 16.9mag 88P/Howell
06:50:41.31 +36:08:52.6 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:29:56.58 +18:41:42.3 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:13:19.98 +16:16:52.0 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:34:17.87 -28:15:20.6 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos
06:39:56.16 +19:52:27.8 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:58:34.56 -09:05:52.0 13.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:47:31.79 +05:05:36.9 13.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:33:07.83 +06:16:42.6 14.6mag 220P/McNaught
05:39:05.88 +42:08:00.9 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
09:42:06.11 +32:30:38.3 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Sep 27 22:30 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 27 22:30 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Sep 27 22:30 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
01:52:55.402 -09:12:08.29 AT 2026aaxv 2026-09-04.64 20.08
05:04:14.730 -42:14:07.54 AT 2026aaxu 2026-09-03.80 19.73
00:02:28.077 -23:32:16.72 AT 2026aaxt 2026-09-04.59 20.16
01:03:33.302 -33:27:15.30 AT 2026aaxs 2026-08-22.73 20.13
02:42:04.255 -11:07:39.46 AT 2026aaxr 2026-09-03.17 19.67
02:31:19.833 -25:27:29.88 SN 2026aaxq 2026-09-06.65 20.16
00:52:57.241 -59:43:14.89 AT 2026aaxp 2026-09-06.70 19.51
01:20:22.758 -62:39:05.68 AT 2026aaxo 2026-09-06.70 20.13
00:14:01.541 -00:00:55.27 AT 2026aaxn 2026-09-08.53 19.62
04:14:33.098 -37:43:12.21 AT 2026aaxm 2026-08-22.80 20.49
19:48:31.105 -23:12:17.17 AT 2026aaxl 2026-09-04.43 20.19
00:38:15.294 -37:17:09.43 AT 2026aaxk 2026-09-04.60 20.02
21:01:01.181 -13:41:08.56 SN 2026aaxj 2026-09-08.41 19.99
22:54:22.028 -56:22:37.05 AT 2026aaxi 2026-09-08.58 20.16
01:42:07.146 -40:01:01.18 AT 2026aaxh 2026-09-04.64 20.37
21:44:13.978 -09:13:15.35 AT 2026aaxg 2026-09-08.45 20.21
02:32:42.330 -42:59:32.85 AT 2026aaxf 2026-09-04.67 20.08
23:28:33.837 -17:12:39.07 AT 2026aaxe 2026-09-04.48 20.3
23:27:55.166 -08:22:08.81 AT 2026aaxd 2026-09-04.50 20.02
03:53:07.549 -45:58:07.67 AT 2026aaxc 2026-09-08.67 20.03
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 27 22:30 tns_transients_list.txt