This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 27.3795 2461310.8795 13.31 05:39:22.64 +17:02:22.9
189.41688 -7.44322 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.53 Kalypso 0 0 0 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:39:22.64 +17:02:22.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:39:22.64 +17:02:22.9: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 27.3795* 05 39 22.64 +17 02 22.9 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461310.8795,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260927.3795 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 27.3795 2461310.8795 13.83 05:25:08.49 +15:01:59.1
189.31083 -11.40723 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.670 Ottegebe 1 0 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:25:08.49 +15:01:59.1: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:25:08.49 +15:01:59.1: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 27.3795* 05 25 08.49 +15 01 59.1 13.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461310.8795,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260927.3795 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 27.3795 2461310.8795 13.73 04:49:24.27 +18:40:34.6
181.22167 -16.38010 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina 0 1 1 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:49:24.27 +18:40:34.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:49:24.27 +18:40:34.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 27.3795* 04 49 24.27 +18 40 34.6 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461310.8795,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260927.3795 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.79071524 23.12.2025 06:58:27.797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
First image: 2461032.79071524 23.12.2025 06:58:27.797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Last image: 2461310.87986223 27.09.2026 09:06:50.097 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17521
Objects passed selection criteria: 17444
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13098.8
Average stars matched: 12557.5 (95.8679 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 243008 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 27 07:47:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.79071524 23.12.2025 06:58:27.797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
First image: 2461032.79071524 23.12.2025 06:58:27.797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Last image: 2461310.87986223 27.09.2026 09:06:50.097 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 105
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 121428
Objects passed selection criteria: 121204
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 97235.8
Average stars matched: 93013.8 (95.658 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 557760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 25 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-225-g3a72982a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-25)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Sep 27 07:48:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461310.87909812
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:02.626 +13:58:29.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44
Second-epoch image center 05:20:02.626 +13:58:29.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0411 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:05.302 +13:58:58.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44
Second-epoch image center 05:20:05.302 +13:58:58.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0297 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:20:02.626 +13:58:29.55
Second-epoch second image center 05:20:05.302 +13:58:58.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01346 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u5kZJeJfwv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kspLK43OZO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Akxtc7249F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ygJkHdBqRd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 18778 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.7748 to 88.3498 deg, Dec +8.6481 to +19.2997 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.7748 to 88.3498 deg, Dec 8.6481 to 19.2997 deg
Loaded 8940 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6904 out of 7673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7673 out of 18778 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.977900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.977900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 18778 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.7748 to 88.3498 deg, Dec +8.6481 to +19.2997 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.7748 to 88.3498 deg, Dec 8.6481 to 19.2997 deg
Loaded 8940 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6904 out of 7673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7673 out of 18778 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 19240 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.5715 to 88.1444 deg, Dec +8.4866 to +19.3515 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.5715 to 88.1444 deg, Dec 8.4866 to 19.3515 deg
Loaded 8970 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6863 out of 7649 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7649 out of 19240 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
2.1 pix Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
15.6 mag. Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.u5kZJeJfwv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1816, bad_region=0, passed=18778
Got 18778 stars (including 16932 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18778 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4765 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits N_match=4765 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1490 n_q2=934 n_q3=1320 n_q4=1021 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits -region wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kspLK43OZO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1850, bad_region=0, passed=19240
Got 19240 stars (including 17364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19240 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5252)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=934 n_q2=1346 n_q3=910 n_q4=1585 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Akxtc7249F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=693, bad_region=0, passed=7374
Got 7374 stars (including 6665 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5265)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=13.017 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.540 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.540 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=0.542 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.756 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.756 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.428 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.428 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4786 robust_rms_before=1.015 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.409 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.339 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.518 worst_region_rms_after=0.428 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.026 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.428
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:02.632 +13:58:28.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7374 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2316848.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.015 -> 0.339 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4786 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4617 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4617 pairs (4786 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4617 robust_rms=12.804 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.420 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.420 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4617 robust_rms=0.538 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.727 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.727 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4617 robust_rms=0.335 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.416 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.416 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4617 robust_rms_before=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.335 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.417 worst_region_rms_after=0.416 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.417 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.416
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:02.632 +13:58:28.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7374 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2317043.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.335 -> 0.335 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4617 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4617 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits N_match=4617 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=956 n_q2=1299 n_q3=896 n_q4=1466 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ygJkHdBqRd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=702, bad_region=0, passed=7365
Got 7365 stars (including 6657 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7365 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=13.037 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.941 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.941 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=0.551 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.766 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.766 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=0.336 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.432 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.432 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4786 robust_rms_before=1.005 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.407 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.336 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.514 worst_region_rms_after=0.432 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.047 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.432
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:05.305 +13:58:57.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7365 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2316865.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.005 -> 0.336 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4786 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4617 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4617 pairs (4786 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4617 robust_rms=12.835 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.634 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.634 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4617 robust_rms=0.545 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.756 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.756 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4617 robust_rms=0.334 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.427 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.427 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4617 robust_rms_before=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.334 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.429 worst_region_rms_after=0.427 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.429 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.427
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:05.305 +13:58:57.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7365 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2317044.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.334 -> 0.334 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4617 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4617 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits N_match=4617 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=955 n_q2=1291 n_q3=901 n_q4=1470 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.356
ref2=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.031
new1=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.053
new2=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.054
reference average sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.1935
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346_astrometric_residuals.png (4765 matched stars from wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166_astrometric_residuals.png (4775 matched stars from wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349_astrometric_residuals.png (4617 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350_astrometric_residuals.png (4617 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22094_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 22094_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:38.53 +15:40:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02571_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 02571_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.35 +17:54:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03372_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 03372_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.38 +17:32:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17500_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 17500_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:19.63 +10:19:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ori-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:02.632 +13:58:28.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44
Second-epoch image center 05:20:02.632 +13:58:28.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0413 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:20:05.305 +13:58:57.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:20:07.226 +14:00:41.44
Second-epoch image center 05:20:05.305 +13:58:57.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0299 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:20:02.632 +13:58:28.76
Second-epoch second image center 05:20:05.305 +13:58:57.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01346 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G5XVfX2en6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iFpB4CqiX8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qEPxAOxdrs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wye0zdDbOM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits and wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 133414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.7535 to 88.3498 deg, Dec +8.6339 to +19.3006 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.7535 to 88.3498 deg, Dec 8.6339 to 19.3006 deg
Loaded 8958 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5727 out of 7745 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7745 out of 133414 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.848900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.848900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 133414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.7535 to 88.3498 deg, Dec +8.6339 to +19.3006 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.7535 to 88.3498 deg, Dec 8.6339 to 19.3006 deg
Loaded 8958 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5727 out of 7745 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7745 out of 133414 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 134593 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.5715 to 88.1446 deg, Dec +8.4624 to +19.3542 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.5715 to 88.1446 deg, Dec 8.4624 to 19.3542 deg
Loaded 8990 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5766 out of 7720 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7720 out of 134593 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
2.0 pix Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
15.8 mag. Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.G5XVfX2en6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=13989, bad_region=9, passed=133386
Got 133386 stars (including 119147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 133386 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 133386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 133386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 133386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4760 stars left (next iteration limit 5236)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits N_match=4760 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.220 n_q1=1388 n_q2=971 n_q3=1291 n_q4=1110 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits -region wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.iFpB4CqiX8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=13660, bad_region=5, passed=134562
Got 134562 stars (including 120666 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 134562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4761 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=4761 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1010 n_q2=1302 n_q3=953 n_q4=1496 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qEPxAOxdrs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2978, bad_region=3, passed=61929
Got 61929 stars (including 58842 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61929 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=13.280 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.209 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.209 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.543 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.741 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.741 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.333 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.422 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.422 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4781 robust_rms_before=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.380 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.333 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.425 worst_region_rms_after=0.422 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.425 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.422
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.425 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.425 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.335 arcsec matched=4781
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=1028 n_q2=1348 n_q3=933 n_q4=1472 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.023
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wye0zdDbOM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2914, bad_region=5, passed=61535
Got 61535 stars (including 58507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61535 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4813 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4813 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5254)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=13.342 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.569 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.569 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=0.555 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.771 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.771 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=0.331 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.435 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.435 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4778 robust_rms_before=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.384 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.331 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.440 worst_region_rms_after=0.435 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.440 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.435
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.440 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.440 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.334 arcsec matched=4778
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.407 n_q1=1020 n_q2=1346 n_q3=924 n_q4=1488 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.034
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-05-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_043048_TTUQ1b1x1_2234311_Q0k4jcVc/wcs_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:24:04.28 +13:17:50.7: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:17:58.15 +10:32:33.3: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:20:33.12 +13:13:25.8: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:52:30.81 +16:44:16.5: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:30:38.51 +16:59:13.7: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:09:25.73 +17:03:41.7: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:24:04.28 +13:17:50.7: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:17:58.15 +10:32:33.3: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:04.28 +13:17:50.7: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5354 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:58.15 +10:32:33.3: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6508 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:20:33.12 +13:13:25.8: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:33.12 +13:13:25.8: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8516 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:03:42.01 +10:06:16.6: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:30:38.51 +16:59:13.7: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:52:30.81 +16:44:16.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:30.81 +16:44:16.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:38.51 +16:59:13.7: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4063 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:09:25.73 +17:03:41.7: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:25.73 +17:03:41.7: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4674 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:10:06.59 +09:32:12.4: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:47:28.56 +10:32:12.2: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:25:13.22 +09:22:36.6: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:03:42.01 +10:06:16.6: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:42.01 +10:06:16.6: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1754 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:15:06.93 +16:59:13.2: 10.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:47:28.56 +10:32:12.2: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:10:06.59 +09:32:12.4: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:25:13.22 +09:22:36.6: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:28.56 +10:32:12.2: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5033 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:06.59 +09:32:12.4: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8393 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:13.22 +09:22:36.6: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7831 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:15:06.93 +16:59:13.2: 10.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.74 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:06.93 +16:59:13.2: ref_mag=10.74 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1583 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:33:56.24 +15:34:07.3: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:40:40.57 +17:10:12.4: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:33:56.24 +15:34:07.3: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:56.24 +15:34:07.3: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8004 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:40:40.57 +17:10:12.4: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:40.57 +17:10:12.4: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9023 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:23:14.66 +11:25:44.6: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:10:00.02 +09:13:01.4: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:39:22.64 +17:02:22.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:48:57.28 +15:44:13.9: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:23:14.66 +11:25:44.6: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:44:56.59 +16:04:30.0: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:14.66 +11:25:44.6: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3386 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:10:00.02 +09:13:01.4: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:00.02 +09:13:01.4: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3582 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:39:22.64 +17:02:22.9: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:22:36.15 +09:14:32.9: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:48:57.28 +15:44:13.9: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:57.28 +15:44:13.9: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2707 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:44:56.59 +16:04:30.0: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:56.59 +16:04:30.0: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3350 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:22:36.15 +09:14:32.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:36.15 +09:14:32.9: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5498 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:27:11.85 +15:43:23.3: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:14:01.56 +17:27:39.2: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:25:08.49 +15:01:59.1: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:48:13.77 +15:35:57.9: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 04:49:24.27 +18:40:34.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:27:11.85 +15:43:23.3: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:14:01.56 +17:27:39.2: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:11.85 +15:43:23.3: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6468 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:28:38.89 +10:10:01.2: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:01.56 +17:27:39.2: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7056 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:25:08.49 +15:01:59.1: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:48:13.77 +15:35:57.9: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:13.77 +15:35:57.9: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5324 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 04:49:24.27 +18:40:34.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:27:10.51 +15:43:15.2: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:20:12.24 +15:58:46.4: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:28:38.89 +10:10:01.2: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:38.89 +10:10:01.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9067 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:27:10.51 +15:43:15.2: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:10.51 +15:43:15.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9378 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:20:12.24 +15:58:46.4: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:12.24 +15:58:46.4: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0168 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-58-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0346.fits at 05:10:08.31 +12:54:11.4: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-38-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 05:10:08.31 +12:54:11.4: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:08.31 +12:54:11.4: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3946 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159327.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159628.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159680.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158332_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158332_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:09.29 +18:01:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158351_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158351_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:25.67 +09:51:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158352_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158352_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158357_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158357_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:49.76 +12:05:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158358_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158358_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:39.04 +17:29:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158359_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158359_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:08.72 +12:49:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158360_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158360_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158367_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158367_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158368_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158368_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.40 +16:08:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158376_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158376_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:46.63 +13:18:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158378_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158378_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158379_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158379_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158380_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158380_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:25.35 +11:13:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158382_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158382_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:59.05 +17:05:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158385_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158385_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:33.60 +15:42:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158386_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158386_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:47.49 +17:31:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158389_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158389_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158392_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158392_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158394_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158394_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.28 +18:20:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158395_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158395_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:21.02 +16:52:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158401_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158401_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:13.03 +11:40:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158402_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158402_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158403_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158403_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158404_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158404_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158408_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158408_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158660_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158660_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:19.06 +09:54:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158801_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158801_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:12.08 +13:31:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158823_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158823_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:07.98 +14:32:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158857_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158857_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:23.68 +14:19:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158887_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158887_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.95 +18:33:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158908_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158908_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:59.72 +09:43:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158910_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158910_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:09.59 +11:00:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158918_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158918_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:53.43 +09:30:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158921_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158921_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:59.94 +09:15:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158965_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158965_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.90 +18:25:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158976_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 158976_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159010_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159010_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:38.65 +15:48:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159012_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159012_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:24.17 +10:29:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159014_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159014_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159041_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159041_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:33.43 +09:52:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159061_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159061_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:35.87 +09:25:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159071_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159071_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:50.07 +13:41:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159083_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159083_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:47.22 +15:56:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159095_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159095_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.41 +18:33:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159097_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159097_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:18.68 +17:43:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159120_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159120_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:51.56 +09:08:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159130_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159130_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:36.56 +11:29:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159171_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159171_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:12.78 +17:05:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159172_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159172_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:59.82 +10:07:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159181_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159181_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:39.94 +15:07:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159202_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159202_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:36.20 +18:33:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159218_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159218_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:48.80 +11:23:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159230_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159230_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:40.97 +11:30:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159246_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159246_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159259_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159259_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:20.66 +10:35:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159265_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159265_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159274_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159274_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:42.20 +12:30:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159292_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159292_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.93 +17:11:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159310_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159310_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:16.75 +12:46:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159327_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 159327_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159328_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159328_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:54.42 +15:37:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159368_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159368_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159380_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159380_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159384_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159384_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:11.90 +16:31:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159388_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159388_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:05.40 +09:59:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159413_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159413_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:02.83 +10:55:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159419_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159419_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:16.97 +17:44:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159447_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159447_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:55.42 +09:59:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159491_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159491_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.92 +08:58:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159492_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159492_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159497_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159497_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:57.85 +17:31:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159521_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159521_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:21.94 +15:38:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159555_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159555_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:05.80 +10:30:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159558_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159558_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:56.68 +12:31:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159562_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159562_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:47.62 +17:17:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159572_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159572_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159614_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159614_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159628_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 159628_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159671_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159671_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159680_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 159680_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159727_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159727_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:21.58 +11:59:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159733_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159733_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:15.71 +18:46:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159758_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159758_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159799_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159799_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159820_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159820_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159822_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159822_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:01.19 +16:19:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159847_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159847_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159942_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159942_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:30.32 +14:30:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159961_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 159961_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66970_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 66970_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:59.01 +14:34:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113921_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 113921_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:18.74 +11:10:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125355_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 125355_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:40.85 +11:59:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102277_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 102277_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:19.63 +10:19:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17024_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 17024_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.35 +17:54:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51774_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 51774_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:38.53 +15:40:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50888_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 50888_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:18.99 +15:45:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129120_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 129120_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:01.91 +12:13:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22297_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 22297_fd_Ori-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_04-06-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks