NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-06-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits
Field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 866305 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 866305 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits_preview.png'
UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits

renamed 'UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits_preview.png'
UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 440.8971 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 558.6277 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 7370.5006 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 2001.8880 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 7380.0460 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1992.2870 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 16.7171 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-27T03:46:19.6000415' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-27T08:46:19.6000415' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61310.3655046294 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-27T08:46:29.5029485' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61310.3656192361 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 148.235369627106 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 53.9995816549056 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9880555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 34.2358333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.81341756735022 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 52 56' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29547 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29547 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 86.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 58.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.200176 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/d_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits :) Spent 0.531585 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/d_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-27T03:47:12.3557372' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-27T08:47:12.3557372' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61310.3661152199 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-27T08:47:22.2589188' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61310.3662298378 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 148.235369574854 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 53.9995816991523 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.0936111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 34.3197222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.78813295688921 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 52 56' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29547 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29547 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 86.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 58.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.200176 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/d_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits :) Spent 0.549036 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/d_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits


fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461310.86562037 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits Image size: 944.9'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:52:38.890 +54:00:47.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09 Second-epoch image center 09:52:38.890 +54:00:47.81 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0614 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Image size: 944.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:52:37.617 +54:00:15.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09 Second-epoch image center 09:52:37.617 +54:00:15.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0597 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:52:38.890 +54:00:47.81 Second-epoch second image center 09:52:37.617 +54:00:15.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00947 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qycsMopUeN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VLgBIRViGK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits &> /tmp/tmp.92W8gafEoa Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xV0Zar2BRu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8427 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec +47.6702 to +59.3560 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec 47.6702 to 59.3560 deg Loaded 6209 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4181 out of 4402 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 8427 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.923200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.923200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8427 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec +47.6702 to +59.3560 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec 47.6702 to 59.3560 deg Loaded 6209 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4181 out of 4402 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 8427 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 8505 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.8795 to 163.5542 deg, Dec +47.6703 to +59.3304 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.8795 to 163.5542 deg, Dec 47.6703 to 59.3304 deg Loaded 6199 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4177 out of 4398 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4398 out of 8505 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 2.2 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 15.7 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 13.9 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits 13.8 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.qycsMopUeN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, bad_region=0, passed=8427 Got 8427 stars (including 7865 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8427 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8427 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8427 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8427 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5402) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1117 n_q2=1329 n_q3=1122 n_q4=1342 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.322 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.VLgBIRViGK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=566, bad_region=0, passed=8505 Got 8505 stars (including 7931 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8505 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8505 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8505 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8505 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=1122 n_q2=1340 n_q3=1113 n_q4=1336 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.92W8gafEoa (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=212, bad_region=0, passed=1804 Got 1804 stars (including 1590 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1804 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1556 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1551 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1550 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1551 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1802 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1556 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1552 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1803 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1552 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1803 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Excluding outliers - 1552 stars left (next iteration limit 1706) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1552 robust_rms=10.437 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.001 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.001 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1552 robust_rms=0.848 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.643 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.959 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1552 robust_rms=0.679 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.082 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.688 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1552 robust_rms_before=1.502 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.591 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.679 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.929 worst_region_rms_after=1.082 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.616 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.688 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.929 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.929 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.591 arcsec matched=1552 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits N_match=1552 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.008 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.652 n_q1=472 n_q2=287 n_q3=479 n_q4=314 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.692 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.xV0Zar2BRu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=210, bad_region=0, passed=1761 Got 1761 stars (including 1549 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1761 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1516 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1512 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1512 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1512 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1760 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1516 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1512 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1760 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1512 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1760 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Excluding outliers - 1512 stars left (next iteration limit 1663) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1512 robust_rms=10.678 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.605 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.605 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1512 robust_rms=0.820 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.586 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.952 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1512 robust_rms=0.669 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.067 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.715 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1512 robust_rms_before=1.498 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.580 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.669 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.968 worst_region_rms_after=1.067 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.521 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.715 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.968 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.968 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.580 arcsec matched=1512 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits N_match=1512 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.043 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.602 n_q1=449 n_q2=276 n_q3=463 n_q4=324 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.821 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.322 ref2=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.248 new1=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits sigma_overall=0.596 worst_q_ratio=1.692 new2=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits sigma_overall=0.573 worst_q_ratio=1.821 reference average sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.285 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286_astrometric_residuals.png (4910 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329_astrometric_residuals.png (1552 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330_astrometric_residuals.png (1512 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits Image size: 944.9'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:52:38.890 +54:00:47.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09 Second-epoch image center 09:52:38.890 +54:00:47.81 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0614 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Image size: 944.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:52:37.617 +54:00:15.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09 Second-epoch image center 09:52:37.617 +54:00:15.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0597 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:52:38.890 +54:00:47.81 Second-epoch second image center 09:52:37.617 +54:00:15.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00947 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pgJDDZiPQN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qIUVeas7Nu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xVhPm0kw6s Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y5yTx9Zoih Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 43398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec +47.6475 to +59.3560 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec 47.6475 to 59.3560 deg Loaded 6260 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3921 out of 4423 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4423 out of 43398 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.812300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.812300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.95 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 43398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec +47.6475 to +59.3560 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec 47.6475 to 59.3560 deg Loaded 6260 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3921 out of 4423 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4423 out of 43398 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 43456 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.7302 to 163.6373 deg, Dec +47.6703 to +59.3417 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.7302 to 163.6373 deg, Dec 47.6703 to 59.3417 deg Loaded 6244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3916 out of 4420 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4420 out of 43456 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 2.1 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.9 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 15.8 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 13.8 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits 13.8 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.pgJDDZiPQN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=2121, bad_region=10, passed=43375 Got 43375 stars (including 41171 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43375 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43375 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43375 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43375 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5405) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1115 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1125 n_q4=1351 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.qIUVeas7Nu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=2172, bad_region=13, passed=43430 Got 43430 stars (including 41162 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43430 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43430 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43430 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43430 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1106 n_q2=1334 n_q3=1128 n_q4=1344 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.xVhPm0kw6s (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=426, bad_region=1, passed=12738 Got 12738 stars (including 12292 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12738 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12738 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12738 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12738 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=9.951 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.974 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.974 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.855 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.577 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.001 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.713 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.093 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.767 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4896 robust_rms_before=1.495 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.590 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.713 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.840 worst_region_rms_after=1.093 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.528 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.767 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.840 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.840 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.590 arcsec matched=4896 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.837 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=1492 n_q2=881 n_q3=1536 n_q4=987 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.431 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Y5yTx9Zoih (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=334, bad_region=1, passed=12741 Got 12741 stars (including 12385 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12741 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12741 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12741 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12741 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=9.854 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.499 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.499 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.841 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.482 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.030 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.712 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.004 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.747 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=1.495 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.584 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.712 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.849 worst_region_rms_after=1.004 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.540 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.747 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.849 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.849 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.584 arcsec matched=4897 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.845 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.629 n_q1=1511 n_q2=870 n_q3=1514 n_q4=1002 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.458 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 09:55:25.27 +57:04:29.3: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 09:39:03.89 +52:19:13.2: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 09:59:37.65 +56:47:40.8: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 09:39:03.89 +52:19:13.2: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 09:59:37.65 +56:47:40.8: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 09:55:25.27 +57:04:29.3: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:39:03.89 +52:19:13.2: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6922 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:55:25.27 +57:04:29.3: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9191 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:59:37.65 +56:47:40.8: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7343 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52981_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 The candidate 52981_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 27.36562    2461310.86562    12.99    09:55:25.16 +57:04:29.0   4914 5049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 27.36623    2461310.86623    12.86    09:55:25.39 +57:04:29.6   4916 5055   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53031_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 The candidate 53031_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 27.36623    2461310.86623    12.44    09:08:58.96 +49:18:54.6   0631 0431   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits **** FOUND 09:08:59.06 +49:18:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53053_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 The candidate 53053_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 27.36623    2461310.86623    12.49    09:29:07.20 +50:00:38.0   2643 0750   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits **** FOUND 09:29:07.20 +50:00:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53072_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 The candidate 53072_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 27.36623    2461310.86623    12.55    09:38:28.70 +49:52:16.7   3552 0662   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits **** FOUND 09:38:28.80 +49:52:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53076_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 The candidate 53076_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 27.36623    2461310.86623    12.48    10:12:37.03 +58:32:58.7   6206 6082   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits **** FOUND 10:12:36.92 +58:33:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53093_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 The candidate 53093_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 27.36562    2461310.86562    12.78    09:39:03.94 +52:19:13.1   3598 2136   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 27.36623    2461310.86623    12.63    09:39:03.83 +52:19:13.2   3599 2142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53096_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 The candidate 53096_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 27.36562    2461310.86562    12.74    09:59:37.68 +56:47:41.3   5271 4907   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0329.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 27.36623    2461310.86623    12.73    09:59:37.62 +56:47:40.3   5272 4912   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53099_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 The candidate 53099_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 27.36623    2461310.86623    12.84    09:38:31.07 +55:52:37.0   3538 4282   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits **** FOUND 09:38:31.07 +55:52:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08161_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 The candidate 08161_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 27.36623    2461310.86623    12.99    09:19:31.41 +57:17:27.0   1980 5183   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-27_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_040628_TTUQ1b1x1_1735953_VXHn7884/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-27_03-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits **** FOUND 09:19:31.37 +57:17:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461310.86562037 -observatory V36 13:32:04.14 -11:01:15.8 Mercury (-0.1mag) 14:11:07.57 -20:19:40.0 Venus (-4.8mag) 08:06:09.67 +21:15:03.4 Mars (1.1mag) 09:24:42.34 +15:49:18.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:46:28.88 +02:02:52.6 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:13.21 +21:00:50.3 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:11:45.12 -00:16:29.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:30.95 -23:42:53.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 00:38:24.38 +07:43:24.3 Moon (-12.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 27 07:23 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461310.86562037: 09:24:37.03 +15:49:47.7 Io (6.0mag) 09:24:53.21 +15:48:21.9 Europa (6.2mag) 09:24:58.82 +15:47:52.0 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:24:43.65 +15:49:12.8 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:23:28.10 +16:11:13.6 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:24:42.92 +15:49:16.3 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:22:42.38 +16:07:05.5 Elara (17.6mag) 09:27:54.23 +15:12:36.4 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:24:19.52 +16:12:40.0 Carme (18.9mag) 00:46:15.12 +02:02:45.9 Titan (8.3mag) 00:46:33.36 +02:02:39.4 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:45:53.37 +02:01:45.6 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:46:39.98 +02:02:13.2 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:44:57.31 +01:51:06.2 Phoebe (16.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 27 07:23 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461310.86562037: 00:59:36.36 +18:05:24.3 JWST 14:47:27.64 +52:27:24.4 Chandra 12:19:43.91 -61:48:01.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 27 07:23 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461310.86562037 -observatory V36 03:47:29.52 +20:01:25.0 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:13:32.91 -33:48:42.9 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:32:55.34 -71:29:44.6 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:44.27 +34:14:47.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:06:19.33 +47:44:25.8 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 21:58:59.26 +25:58:46.6 17.6mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:23:30.56 +25:38:06.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 11:07:41.19 +26:36:53.3 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 10:00:52.38 +05:07:27.0 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:11.21 -17:23:36.6 15.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:53:55.88 +34:20:28.1 16.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:10:34.75 +15:08:14.8 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:26:05.62 +42:12:57.7 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:02:16.25 +47:42:27.0 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:43:50.19 -13:21:54.8 14.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 11:51:43.15 +17:09:11.0 16.5mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:37:19.52 -01:32:34.1 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:46:41.48 +69:50:12.5 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:50:56.78 +44:56:13.9 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:32:11.99 +12:57:14.0 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:43:45.88 -34:13:25.3 14.0mag 10P/Tempel 01:50:25.28 +39:36:27.9 17.2mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:01:45.23 -07:01:42.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:48:58.10 -11:16:58.1 17.9mag 63P/Wild 07:15:05.36 +17:28:06.4 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:11:34.49 +14:51:54.1 16.9mag 88P/Howell 06:47:53.27 +35:53:23.1 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:27:55.29 +18:56:57.4 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:11:40.96 +16:27:25.1 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:32:27.11 -28:00:41.5 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos 06:39:12.42 +19:54:24.2 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 00:07:05.20 -09:45:26.7 13.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:46:00.35 +05:19:11.4 13.1mag 169P/NEAT 03:33:07.75 +06:22:27.5 14.6mag 220P/McNaught 05:37:26.07 +41:56:30.6 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 15:39:56.12 -02:26:47.9 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski 09:44:27.34 +15:51:14.8 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 27 07:23 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 27 07:23 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Sep 27 07:23 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 06:25:33.313 -20:11:11.96 AT 2026aaut 2026-08-30.77 19.31 06:14:32.572 -24:42:19.36 AT 2026aaus 2026-09-04.79 19.93 06:10:08.738 -43:00:39.69 AT 2026aaur 2026-09-04.79 19.91 04:32:40.620 -40:57:11.51 AT 2026aauq 2026-09-04.72 19.78 04:16:08.060 -02:15:01.22 AT 2026aaup 2026-08-30.70 19.14 21:05:07.063 -18:02:34.69 AT 2026aauo 2026-08-30.59 19.75 23:45:38.204 -16:12:16.04 AT 2026aaun 2026-09-04.50 20.04 01:06:51.439 -11:55:59.53 AT 2026aaum 2026-09-04.57 20.03 22:55:49.384 -49:52:26.66 AT 2026aaul 2026-09-04.59 19.79 02:06:18.906 -16:24:37.27 AT 2026aauk 2026-09-03.73 19.72 01:45:01.907 -48:19:49.51 AT 2026aauj 2026-08-07.73 20.23 02:57:38.158 -36:56:04.66 AT 2026aaui 2026-08-22.76 20.46 02:11:30.245 -27:58:31.40 AT 2026aauh 2026-09-04.65 20.17 04:40:34.354 -44:14:37.62 AT 2026aaug 2026-08-27.77 19.45 01:43:40.711 -45:30:00.49 AT 2026aauf 2026-09-04.63 20.28 01:55:59.163 -14:46:35.57 AT 2026aaue 2026-09-03.74 19.86 23:46:22.482 -55:45:47.47 AT 2026aaud 2026-09-04.64 19.73 02:51:42.071 -40:00:46.34 AT 2026aauc 2026-09-04.66 20.14 04:00:56.503 -31:21:32.44 AT 2026aaub 2026-09-04.71 19.87 05:25:35.891 -32:38:44.36 AT 2026aaua 2026-09-04.75 19.59 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 27 07:23 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 99 C - WARNING