######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 942713 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 942713 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

renamed 'UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 440.9575
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 445.9569
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 6653.4840
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1653.8581
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 6595.9952
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1649.5861
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 15.0887
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-26T23:07:53.0663606' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-27T04:07:53.0663606' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61310.1721419678 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-27T04:08:02.9697583' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61310.1722565857 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 205.713216032537 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.999552903361 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 17.0413888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 334.753055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.3764115159172 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29522 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29522 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 11.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits :)
Spent 0.510562 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-26T23:08:40.6045371' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-27T04:08:40.6045371' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61310.172692176 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-27T04:08:50.5119567' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61310.1728068404 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 205.713216084755 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9995529455875 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 16.9705555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 334.818055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.389763945259 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29522 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29522 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 11.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits :)
Spent 0.519700 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461310.67225771
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:58.617 +61:59:37.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:58.617 +61:59:37.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0251 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:55.963 +61:59:32.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:55.963 +61:59:32.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0221 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:42:58.617 +61:59:37.96
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:55.963 +61:59:32.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00543 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s08TOxzpCQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uA5Z25NVEY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KOURCen0x7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8GK3zlSF6S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.660400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.660400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec +55.8887 to +67.2580 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec 55.8887 to 67.2580 deg
Loaded 6076 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3951 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 6522 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.4 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
14.3 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
14.3 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.s08TOxzpCQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, bad_region=0, passed=6503
Got 6503 stars (including 6118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1153 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uA5Z25NVEY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, bad_region=0, passed=6522
Got 6522 stars (including 6118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1286 n_q3=1172 n_q4=1150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KOURCen0x7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=257, bad_region=0, passed=1928
Got 1928 stars (including 1670 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1622 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1620 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1620 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1620 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1622 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1620 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1620 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 1620 stars left (next iteration limit 1782)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1620 robust_rms=12.806 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.330 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.330 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1620 robust_rms=0.758 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.020 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.883 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1620 robust_rms=0.525 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.790 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.534 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1620 robust_rms_before=1.177 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.444 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.525 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.637 worst_region_rms_after=0.790 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.166 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.534
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.637 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.637 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.444 arcsec matched=1620
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits N_match=1620 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.649 n_q1=445 n_q2=366 n_q3=451 n_q4=358 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.420
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8GK3zlSF6S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=256, bad_region=0, passed=1972
Got 1972 stars (including 1715 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1972 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1665 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1663 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1663 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1664 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1662 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1662 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 1662 stars left (next iteration limit 1829)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1662 robust_rms=12.984 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.205 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.205 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1662 robust_rms=0.722 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.958 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.825 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1662 robust_rms=0.525 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.708 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.503 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1662 robust_rms_before=1.135 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.525 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.562 worst_region_rms_after=0.708 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.180 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.503
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.562 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.562 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.419 arcsec matched=1662
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits N_match=1662 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.572 n_q1=472 n_q2=372 n_q3=454 n_q4=364 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.374
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.153
ref2=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.123
new1=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits sigma_overall=0.457 worst_q_ratio=1.420
new2=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.374
reference average sigma_overall=0.3795 worst_q_ratio=1.138
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180_astrometric_residuals.png (4884 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083_astrometric_residuals.png (1620 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084_astrometric_residuals.png (1662 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:58.617 +61:59:37.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:58.617 +61:59:37.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0251 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:55.963 +61:59:32.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:55.963 +61:59:32.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0221 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:42:58.617 +61:59:37.96
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:55.963 +61:59:32.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00543 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zFwVJyM63R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xRLBAK0huB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KM8JV1WCOK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1auyhtksLi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg
Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.540000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.540000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg
Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 33636 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec +55.8888 to +67.2587 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec 55.8888 to 67.2587 deg
Loaded 6169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3802 out of 4121 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4121 out of 33636 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 31 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.2 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.0 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
2.0 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
14.2 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
14.2 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zFwVJyM63R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1409, bad_region=1, passed=33795
Got 33795 stars (including 32344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=1267 n_q2=1311 n_q3=1124 n_q4=1178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xRLBAK0huB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=1410, bad_region=0, passed=33603
Got 33603 stars (including 32157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33603 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1315 n_q3=1126 n_q4=1168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KM8JV1WCOK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=588, bad_region=2, passed=14059
Got 14059 stars (including 13447 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14059 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=12.200 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.243 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.243 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.782 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.000 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.908 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.556 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.803 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.576 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=1.192 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.444 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.556 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.612 worst_region_rms_after=0.803 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.208 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.576
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.612 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.612 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.444 arcsec matched=4875
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.584 n_q1=1446 n_q2=1129 n_q3=1332 n_q4=968 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.323
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1auyhtksLi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=502, bad_region=2, passed=13870
Got 13870 stars (including 13335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13870 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=12.256 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.428 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.428 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.774 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.029 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.932 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.569 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.785 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.576 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=1.189 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.437 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.569 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.547 worst_region_rms_after=0.785 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.285 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.576
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.547 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.547 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.437 arcsec matched=4875
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.555 n_q1=1437 n_q2=1135 n_q3=1332 n_q4=971 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:41:29.56 +58:56:24.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:55:35.83 +65:26:11.7: 11.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:24:48.19 +62:57:10.8: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:55:35.83 +65:26:11.7: 11.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:41:29.56 +58:56:24.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:41:29.56 +58:56:24.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:55:35.83 +65:26:11.7: ref_mag=11.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4167 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:24:48.19 +62:57:10.8: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:24:48.19 +62:57:10.8: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0183 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52249_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52249_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 27.17226 | 2461310.67226 | 12.49 | 12:41:29.39 +58:56:22.6 | 9458 4784 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 12.31 | 12:41:29.73 +58:56:25.7 | 9454 4783 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52250_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52250_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 12.78 | 14:30:48.05 +62:45:36.7 | 1559 2215 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
**** FOUND 14:30:48.13 +62:45:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52251_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52251_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 12.76 | 14:34:36.38 +56:20:14.2 | 0266 5921 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
**** FOUND 14:34:36.42 +56:20:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52252_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52252_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 12.24 | 14:26:57.87 +58:09:03.9 | 1160 4995 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
**** FOUND 14:26:57.93 +58:09:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52253_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52253_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 11.40 | 14:21:55.12 +62:15:58.1 | 2096 2649 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
**** FOUND 14:21:55.17 +62:15:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52254_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52254_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 27.17226 | 2461310.67226 | 11.45 | 13:55:35.82 +65:26:11.8 | 4140 1056 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 11.38 | 13:55:35.84 +65:26:11.6 | 4137 1054 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52296_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52296_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 10.82 | 14:45:48.60 +60:28:46.9 | 0124 3246 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52297_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52297_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 10.75 | 14:32:49.93 +57:46:26.7 | 0641 5106 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52314_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52314_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 10.44 | 13:01:56.63 +58:41:04.3 | 7869 5142 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52364_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52364_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 11.66 | 13:41:10.44 +66:21:03.8 | 5070 0580 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52374_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52374_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 11.97 | 14:28:26.80 +64:53:18.6 | 2026 1004 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52386_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52386_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 11.65 | 12:46:34.48 +64:08:46.3 | 8582 1727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52387_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52387_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 11.71 | 13:07:29.93 +65:47:19.6 | 7134 0898 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52398_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52398_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 12.14 | 14:15:48.92 +56:40:25.7 | 1861 6061 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
**** FOUND 14:15:48.88 +56:40:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52404_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52404_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 11.94 | 13:34:03.40 +58:20:26.8 | 5342 5422 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52412_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52412_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 12.28 | 13:52:20.17 +64:09:59.1 | 4262 1839 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52459_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52459_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 12.82 | 14:17:02.57 +59:37:51.5 | 2118 4280 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
**** FOUND 14:17:02.69 +59:37:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52497_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52497_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 12.57 | 13:29:59.59 +64:31:24.8 | 5727 1708 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52548_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52548_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 27.17226 | 2461310.67226 | 13.02 | 14:24:48.09 +62:57:10.7 | 1994 2202 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-07-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 13.01 | 14:24:48.29 +62:57:10.8 | 1990 2200 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52559_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52559_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 12.78 | 13:51:23.78 +59:00:25.2 | 4015 4935 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52590_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52590_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 12.90 | 14:55:26.75 +65:31:21.1 | 0477 0121 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52643_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52643_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 12.75 | 12:39:57.33 +63:16:05.7 | 9112 2176 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52663_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52663_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 13.05 | 13:42:04.34 +64:48:52.0 | 4957 1504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52715_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52715_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 13.31 | 13:46:16.24 +67:05:28.6 | 4798 0111 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52751_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52751_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 13.66 | 14:17:06.39 +63:47:55.3 | 2609 1812 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
**** FOUND 14:17:06.39 +63:47:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52775_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52775_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 13.58 | 13:38:44.53 +64:25:25.5 | 5158 1751 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52802_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 13.74 | 13:52:24.21 +60:34:32.4 | 4035 3987 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52803_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52803_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 13.51 | 14:15:07.97 +59:45:01.1 | 2275 4236 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52814_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 52814_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 13.53 | 13:12:01.80 +58:14:05.6 | 7090 5469 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04915_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 04915_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 12.73 | 12:41:43.73 +65:07:54.4 | 8801 1083 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03084_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084
The candidate 03084_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 27.17281 | 2461310.67281 | 9.62 | 12:37:46.02 +65:33:20.6 | 9006 0782 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232541_TTUQ1b1x1_3430359_rFCqpbLw/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-26_23-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits |
**** FOUND 12:37:45.98 +65:33:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461310.67225771 -observatory V36
13:31:04.44 -10:53:59.3 Mercury (-0.1mag)
14:10:57.79 -20:17:44.0 Venus (-4.8mag)
08:05:40.55 +21:16:15.7 Mars (1.1mag)
09:24:33.77 +15:49:56.5 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:46:32.24 +02:03:14.2 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:13.88 +21:00:51.8 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:11:46.32 -00:16:21.6 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:31.41 -23:42:52.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
00:32:30.33 +06:28:52.7 Moon (-12.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 27 03:16 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461310.67225771:
09:24:29.29 +15:50:20.9 Io (6.0mag)
09:24:43.62 +15:49:04.9 Europa (6.2mag)
09:24:49.33 +15:48:35.0 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:24:33.06 +15:50:01.2 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:23:18.80 +16:11:50.7 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:24:31.45 +15:50:08.6 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:22:33.40 +16:07:39.6 Elara (17.6mag)
09:27:46.21 +15:13:15.5 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:24:11.81 +16:13:14.5 Carme (18.9mag)
00:46:18.20 +02:03:09.7 Titan (8.3mag)
00:46:36.50 +02:02:58.2 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:45:56.98 +02:02:09.6 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:46:42.72 +02:02:34.1 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:45:00.82 +01:51:28.5 Phoebe (16.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 27 03:17 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461310.67225771:
00:59:00.55 +17:57:46.0 JWST
12:46:35.51 +53:41:33.1 Chandra
10:06:22.68 -56:06:12.1 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 27 03:17 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461310.67225771 -observatory V36
03:47:28.56 +20:01:08.7 17.2mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:13:24.86 -33:48:59.0 14.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:32:48.63 -71:29:00.2 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:44.42 +34:14:27.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:06:19.75 +47:43:20.2 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
21:59:06.68 +26:00:26.5 17.6mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:23:24.03 +25:38:16.7 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
11:07:30.82 +26:37:10.0 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
10:00:45.64 +05:07:30.1 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:10.93 -17:22:37.1 15.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:53:48.08 +34:19:28.6 16.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:10:31.62 +15:08:18.9 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:26:07.06 +42:13:35.5 13.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:02:27.81 +47:43:38.0 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:43:46.99 -13:21:41.7 14.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
11:51:22.64 +17:10:08.4 16.5mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:37:08.55 -01:31:35.6 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:45:57.54 +69:53:22.9 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:51:08.08 +44:57:16.4 17.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:32:00.77 +12:56:13.3 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:43:35.69 -34:15:00.5 14.0mag 10P/Tempel
01:50:08.90 +39:36:00.8 17.2mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:01:37.27 -07:00:47.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:48:34.56 -11:13:30.1 17.9mag 63P/Wild
07:14:46.54 +17:29:14.5 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:11:41.91 +14:52:10.7 16.9mag 88P/Howell
06:47:11.35 +35:49:25.6 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:27:24.77 +19:00:42.4 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:11:16.06 +16:30:02.1 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:31:59.36 -27:57:03.1 17.7mag 124P/Mrkos
06:39:01.40 +19:54:51.8 15.7mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
00:09:12.30 -09:55:00.8 13.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:45:37.26 +05:22:35.3 13.1mag 169P/NEAT
03:33:07.88 +06:23:51.9 14.6mag 220P/McNaught
05:37:01.09 +41:53:31.2 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
15:39:46.65 -02:25:34.4 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski
09:44:18.07 +15:51:47.6 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 27 03:17 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 27 03:16 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Sep 27 03:16 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
06:14:32.572 -24:42:19.36 AT 2026aaus 2026-09-04.79 19.93
06:10:08.738 -43:00:39.69 AT 2026aaur 2026-09-04.79 19.91
04:32:40.620 -40:57:11.51 AT 2026aauq 2026-09-04.72 19.78
04:16:08.060 -02:15:01.22 AT 2026aaup 2026-08-30.70 19.14
21:05:07.063 -18:02:34.69 AT 2026aauo 2026-08-30.59 19.75
23:45:38.204 -16:12:16.04 AT 2026aaun 2026-09-04.50 20.04
01:06:51.439 -11:55:59.53 AT 2026aaum 2026-09-04.57 20.03
22:55:49.384 -49:52:26.66 AT 2026aaul 2026-09-04.59 19.79
02:06:18.906 -16:24:37.27 AT 2026aauk 2026-09-03.73 19.72
01:45:01.907 -48:19:49.51 AT 2026aauj 2026-08-07.73 20.23
02:57:38.158 -36:56:04.66 AT 2026aaui 2026-08-22.76 20.46
02:11:30.245 -27:58:31.40 AT 2026aauh 2026-09-04.65 20.17
04:40:34.354 -44:14:37.62 AT 2026aaug 2026-08-27.77 19.45
01:43:40.711 -45:30:00.49 AT 2026aauf 2026-09-04.63 20.28
01:55:59.163 -14:46:35.57 AT 2026aaue 2026-09-03.74 19.86
23:46:22.482 -55:45:47.47 AT 2026aaud 2026-09-04.64 19.73
02:51:42.071 -40:00:46.34 AT 2026aauc 2026-09-04.66 20.14
04:00:56.503 -31:21:32.44 AT 2026aaub 2026-09-04.71 19.87
05:25:35.891 -32:38:44.36 AT 2026aaua 2026-09-04.75 19.59
05:38:05.780 -29:07:38.11 AT 2026aatz 2026-09-04.77 19.45
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 27 03:16 tns_transients_list.txt