NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-11-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits
Field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.china-vo.org
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.china-vo.org)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-11-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-11-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-11-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 894348 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 894348 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits_preview.png'
Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits

renamed 'Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits_preview.png'
Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1654.6390 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.5033 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1448.1695 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 520.5907 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1446.2694 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 520.3942 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.875218 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-21T04:56:18.9907797' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-21T09:56:18.9907797' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61304.4141086806 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-21T09:56:28.8937106' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61304.4142232984 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 26.6633764278393 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9997795544852 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 34.8091666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 203.963611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.74833205694298 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 46 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29544 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29544 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 290.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/d_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits :) Spent 0.538876 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/d_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-21T04:57:07.5407103' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-21T09:57:07.5407103' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61304.414670602 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-21T09:57:17.4425866' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61304.4147852082 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 26.6633763793159 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9997795513109 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 34.7413888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 204.179166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.75129561370601 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 46 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29544 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29544 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 290.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/d_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits :) Spent 0.539442 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/d_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits


fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461304.91422442 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:46:42.365 -17:58:41.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 Second-epoch image center 01:46:42.365 -17:58:41.62 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0221 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:46:43.049 -17:58:08.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 Second-epoch image center 01:46:43.049 -17:58:08.46 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0316 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 01:46:42.365 -17:58:41.62 Second-epoch second image center 01:46:43.049 -17:58:08.46 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00960 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XrSwndlI0f Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pDfplx7BqU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iYBsBAS1eI Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vofXkMckXS Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg Loaded 4115 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2743 out of 2866 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2866 out of 3748 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg Loaded 4115 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2743 out of 2866 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2866 out of 3748 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 4329 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3267 to 35.1802 deg, Dec -23.3270 to -12.4424 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3267 to 35.1802 deg, Dec -23.3270 to -12.4424 deg Loaded 4183 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3033 out of 3123 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3123 out of 4329 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (aperture=5.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 2.1 pix Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.9 mag. Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 15.2 mag. Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.XrSwndlI0f (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=374, bad_region=0, passed=3748 Got 3748 stars (including 3370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3308 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3308 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3748 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3308 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3748 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3748 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 3308 stars left (next iteration limit 3638) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=3308 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=748 n_q2=870 n_q3=779 n_q4=911 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.pDfplx7BqU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=326, bad_region=0, passed=4329 Got 4329 stars (including 3994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4329 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4329 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4329 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4329 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 3908 stars left (next iteration limit 4298) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits N_match=3908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=929 n_q2=998 n_q3=973 n_q4=1008 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.iYBsBAS1eI (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=306, bad_region=0, passed=4292 Got 4292 stars (including 3979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4292 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4292 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4292 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4292 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 3896 stars left (next iteration limit 4285) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3896 robust_rms=13.959 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.047 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.047 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3896 robust_rms=0.543 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.623 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.623 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3896 robust_rms=0.362 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.385 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.324 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3896 robust_rms_before=1.124 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.362 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.331 worst_region_rms_after=0.385 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.156 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.324 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.331 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.331 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.310 arcsec matched=3896 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits N_match=3896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=996 n_q2=911 n_q3=1052 n_q4=937 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.vofXkMckXS (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=312, bad_region=0, passed=4246 Got 4246 stars (including 3928 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4246 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3845 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4246 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4246 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4246 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 3846 stars left (next iteration limit 4229) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3846 robust_rms=13.913 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.099 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.099 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3846 robust_rms=0.573 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.672 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.672 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3846 robust_rms=0.381 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.422 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.366 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3846 robust_rms_before=1.136 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.338 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.381 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.387 worst_region_rms_after=0.422 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.172 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.366 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.387 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.387 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.338 arcsec matched=3846 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits N_match=3846 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=972 n_q2=901 n_q3=1045 n_q4=928 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.206 ref2=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits sigma_overall=0.261 worst_q_ratio=1.327 new1=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.083 new2=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.103 reference average sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.2665 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028_astrometric_residuals.png (3308 matched stars from wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086_astrometric_residuals.png (3908 matched stars from wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304_astrometric_residuals.png (3896 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305_astrometric_residuals.png (3846 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00889_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 00889_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    10.24    02:15:59.73 -20:31:09.8   0540 4571   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 02:15:59.73 -20:31:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:46:42.365 -17:58:41.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 Second-epoch image center 01:46:42.365 -17:58:41.62 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0221 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:46:43.049 -17:58:08.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 Second-epoch image center 01:46:43.049 -17:58:08.46 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0316 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 01:46:42.365 -17:58:41.62 Second-epoch second image center 01:46:43.049 -17:58:08.46 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00960 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.acVSqL41VA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LtY0FJgfsO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M7Cu4GjDWg Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.39NGJGDlpz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 21033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg Loaded 4142 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3196 out of 3400 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3400 out of 21033 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.737300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.737300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 21033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg Loaded 4142 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3196 out of 3400 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3400 out of 21033 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 23371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3056 to 35.3091 deg, Dec -23.3269 to -12.4103 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3056 to 35.3091 deg, Dec -23.3269 to -12.4103 deg Loaded 4230 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3215 out of 3388 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3388 out of 23371 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 2.0 pix Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 15.3 mag. Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.acVSqL41VA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=795, bad_region=1, passed=21024 Got 21024 stars (including 20191 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21024 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21024 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21024 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21024 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5353) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=1143 n_q2=1260 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.LtY0FJgfsO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=721, bad_region=23, passed=23358 Got 23358 stars (including 22574 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23358 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.245 n_q1=1257 n_q2=1241 n_q3=1215 n_q4=1158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.M7Cu4GjDWg (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=733, bad_region=40, passed=23847 Got 23847 stars (including 23035 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23847 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23847 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23847 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23847 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4859 stars left (next iteration limit 5344) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=13.863 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.515 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.515 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=0.559 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.660 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.660 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.392 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.339 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4859 robust_rms_before=1.125 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.314 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.373 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.347 worst_region_rms_after=0.392 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.166 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.339 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.347 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.347 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.314 arcsec matched=4859 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits N_match=4859 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=1263 n_q2=1178 n_q3=1258 n_q4=1160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.39NGJGDlpz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=741, bad_region=40, passed=23941 Got 23941 stars (including 23123 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23941 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23941 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23941 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23941 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=13.896 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.342 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.342 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.585 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.676 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.676 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.382 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.418 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.374 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4864 robust_rms_before=1.136 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.337 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.382 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.391 worst_region_rms_after=0.418 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.179 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.374 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.391 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.391 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.337 arcsec matched=4864 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1262 n_q2=1190 n_q3=1255 n_q4=1157 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:39:27.32 -14:24:12.7: 13.79 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 02:19:09.45 -14:31:34.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 02:15:25.79 -15:56:52.5: 14.15 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:41:53.72 -13:59:21.0: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 02:19:18.98 -15:32:57.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:15:44.11 -19:16:41.2: 14.27 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:31:43.32 -13:55:01.8: 13.47 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:54:58.21 -13:22:14.8: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:21:47.78 -22:29:50.0: 14.48 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:58:37.40 -23:06:06.5: 14.48 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 02:19:09.45 -14:31:34.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:09.45 -14:31:34.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 02:19:18.98 -15:32:57.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:18.98 -15:32:57.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:15:44.11 -19:16:41.2: 14.28 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:39:27.32 -14:24:12.7: 14.01 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:41:53.72 -13:59:21.0: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:21:47.78 -22:29:50.0: 14.29 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 02:15:25.79 -15:56:52.5: 14.37 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:54:58.21 -13:22:14.8: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:39:27.32 -14:24:12.7: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1925 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:15:44.11 -19:16:41.2: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1423 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:31:43.32 -13:55:01.8: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:58:37.40 -23:06:06.5: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:41:53.72 -13:59:21.0: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7959 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:15:25.79 -15:56:52.5: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1056 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:47.78 -22:29:50.0: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0949 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:54:58.21 -13:22:14.8: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7134 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:31:43.32 -13:55:01.8: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5450 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:58:37.40 -23:06:06.5: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2262 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:14:09.34 -22:02:31.5: 14.48 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:18:26.48 -18:45:05.0: 14.34 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:14:09.34 -22:02:31.5: 14.53 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:14:09.34 -22:02:31.5: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1896 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 02:15:01.83 -14:30:51.6: 14.31 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 02:03:48.41 -13:34:42.9: 14.80 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:18:26.48 -18:45:05.0: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:26.48 -18:45:05.0: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3507 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 02:03:48.41 -13:34:42.9: 14.93 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 02:15:01.83 -14:30:51.6: 14.61 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:03:48.41 -13:34:42.9: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4114 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:15:01.83 -14:30:51.6: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3803 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33557_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 33557_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.41422    2461304.91422    13.55    01:31:43.32 -13:55:02.2   7132 0901   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    13.54    01:31:43.32 -13:55:01.5   7133 0906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33769_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 33769_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.41422    2461304.91422    12.80    01:41:53.72 -13:59:20.9   5639 0839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    12.79    01:41:53.71 -13:59:21.1   5640 0845   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34003_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 34003_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.41422    2461304.91422    13.75    01:54:58.21 -13:22:14.4   3746 0352   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    13.69    01:54:58.20 -13:22:15.1   3747 0357   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34096_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 34096_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.41422    2461304.91422    14.07    01:15:44.10 -19:16:42.0   9159 4345   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    14.27    01:15:44.12 -19:16:40.5   9161 4350   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34101_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 34101_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.41422    2461304.91422    14.10    02:15:25.92 -15:56:52.6   0682 1791   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    14.12    02:15:25.65 -15:56:52.3   0684 1796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34106_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 34106_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.41422    2461304.91422    14.09    01:21:47.79 -22:29:49.2   8104 6204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    14.10    01:21:47.76 -22:29:50.9   8105 6210   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34131_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 34131_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.41422    2461304.91422    14.20    01:58:37.43 -23:06:06.6   2943 6200   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    14.26    01:58:37.36 -23:06:06.5   2945 6205   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34145_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 34145_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.41422    2461304.91422    14.19    01:39:27.29 -14:24:12.1   5978 1113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    14.19    01:39:27.34 -14:24:13.2   5979 1119   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34169_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 34169_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.41422    2461304.91422    14.27    02:19:09.45 -14:31:33.6   0144 0908   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    14.29    02:19:09.45 -14:31:34.8   0146 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34177_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 34177_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.41422    2461304.91422    14.29    02:19:19.00 -15:32:56.9   0111 1533   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    14.41    02:19:18.95 -15:32:57.6   0112 1538   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34179_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 34179_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.41422    2461304.91422    14.21    01:14:09.27 -22:02:31.9   9214 6047   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    14.17    01:14:09.40 -22:02:31.1   9215 6053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34189_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 34189_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    14.12    02:11:32.29 -20:02:19.6   1189 4291   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits **** FOUND 02:11:32.19 -20:02:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34207_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 34207_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.41422    2461304.91422    14.30    01:18:26.50 -18:45:05.4   8800 3986   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    14.42    01:18:26.46 -18:45:04.6   8801 3991   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34210_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 34210_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.41422    2461304.91422    14.36    02:15:01.74 -14:30:51.5   0760 0919   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    14.40    02:15:01.92 -14:30:51.7   0761 0925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34216_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 The candidate 34216_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.41422    2461304.91422    14.36    02:03:48.42 -13:34:43.1   2439 0414   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-56-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0304.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.41479    2461304.91479    14.48    02:03:48.40 -13:34:42.6   2441 0419   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_223249_TTUQ1b1x1_3321552_QeoQfUI6/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0305.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cet-11-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461304.91422442 -observatory V36 13:00:50.92 -07:05:14.8 Mercury (-0.3mag) 14:04:42.79 -19:03:24.1 Venus (-4.8mag) 07:51:08.36 +21:51:04.5 Mars (1.2mag) 09:20:15.89 +16:09:04.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:48:08.60 +02:13:54.9 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:30.41 +21:01:33.3 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:12:21.38 -00:12:30.7 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:46.00 -23:42:12.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 19:50:54.63 -24:07:40.5 Moon (-11.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 27 01:39 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461304.91422442: 09:20:20.23 +16:08:42.8 Io (6.0mag) 09:20:13.27 +16:09:19.9 Europa (6.2mag) 09:20:27.96 +16:08:01.6 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:19:54.58 +16:10:54.5 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:18:40.22 +16:30:14.7 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:20:19.75 +16:08:46.4 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:18:03.39 +16:24:53.3 Elara (17.6mag) 09:23:43.06 +15:33:14.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:20:19.19 +16:30:47.0 Carme (18.9mag) 00:48:13.28 +02:14:08.5 Titan (8.3mag) 00:48:04.93 +02:13:38.6 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:47:44.29 +02:14:04.5 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:47:55.94 +02:13:31.5 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:46:41.86 +02:02:30.4 Phoebe (16.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 27 01:39 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461304.91422442: 00:05:32.51 +14:12:48.8 JWST 19:41:36.23 -14:37:32.7 Chandra 12:48:06.45 -62:15:07.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 27 01:39 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461304.91422442 -observatory V36 03:46:27.80 +19:52:23.9 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:09:40.66 -33:56:09.3 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:29:19.83 -71:07:33.0 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:42.06 +34:04:46.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:05:01.68 +47:12:34.2 16.4mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:02:55.19 +26:49:11.9 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:19:59.58 +25:43:43.3 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 11:02:22.40 +26:46:12.7 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:57:23.12 +05:09:13.6 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:17.37 -16:52:46.9 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:49:47.07 +33:51:43.1 16.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:09:06.61 +15:10:42.5 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:27:14.68 +42:31:30.6 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:08:31.39 +48:16:34.8 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:41:56.95 -13:15:23.9 14.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 11:41:24.45 +17:38:27.6 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:31:50.13 -01:02:39.9 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:24:55.00 +71:18:39.9 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:56:19.05 +45:25:29.2 17.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:26:31.77 +12:26:41.1 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:38:09.74 -34:52:45.1 13.8mag 10P/Tempel 01:41:21.71 +39:13:34.6 17.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:57:42.53 -06:33:21.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:36:59.38 -09:29:10.2 17.8mag 63P/Wild 07:05:10.86 +18:02:42.7 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:14:42.00 +14:59:05.5 16.8mag 88P/Howell 06:26:38.73 +33:50:34.3 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:12:02.77 +20:49:58.9 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:58:55.27 +17:47:34.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:18:29.11 -26:06:22.5 17.6mag 124P/Mrkos 06:33:19.16 +20:08:40.8 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 01:06:14.94 -13:46:36.8 14.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:36:19.68 +07:11:49.8 12.7mag 169P/NEAT 03:32:18.99 +07:04:44.5 14.6mag 220P/McNaught 05:23:59.64 +40:24:28.3 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 15:35:14.10 -01:48:35.5 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski 09:39:40.19 +16:08:27.0 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 27 01:39 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 27 01:39 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Sep 27 01:39 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 06:14:32.572 -24:42:19.36 AT 2026aaus 2026-09-04.79 19.93 06:10:08.738 -43:00:39.69 AT 2026aaur 2026-09-04.79 19.91 04:32:40.620 -40:57:11.51 AT 2026aauq 2026-09-04.72 19.78 04:16:08.060 -02:15:01.22 AT 2026aaup 2026-08-30.70 19.14 21:05:07.063 -18:02:34.69 AT 2026aauo 2026-08-30.59 19.75 23:45:38.204 -16:12:16.04 AT 2026aaun 2026-09-04.50 20.04 01:06:51.439 -11:55:59.53 AT 2026aaum 2026-09-04.57 20.03 22:55:49.384 -49:52:26.66 AT 2026aaul 2026-09-04.59 19.79 02:06:18.906 -16:24:37.27 AT 2026aauk 2026-09-03.73 19.72 01:45:01.907 -48:19:49.51 AT 2026aauj 2026-08-07.73 20.23 02:57:38.158 -36:56:04.66 AT 2026aaui 2026-08-22.76 20.46 02:11:30.245 -27:58:31.40 AT 2026aauh 2026-09-04.65 20.17 04:40:34.354 -44:14:37.62 AT 2026aaug 2026-08-27.77 19.45 01:43:40.711 -45:30:00.49 AT 2026aauf 2026-09-04.63 20.28 01:55:59.163 -14:46:35.57 AT 2026aaue 2026-09-03.74 19.86 23:46:22.482 -55:45:47.47 AT 2026aaud 2026-09-04.64 19.73 02:51:42.071 -40:00:46.34 AT 2026aauc 2026-09-04.66 20.14 04:00:56.503 -31:21:32.44 AT 2026aaub 2026-09-04.71 19.87 05:25:35.891 -32:38:44.36 AT 2026aaua 2026-09-04.75 19.59 05:38:05.780 -29:07:38.11 AT 2026aatz 2026-09-04.77 19.45 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 27 01:39 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C