NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-09-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 695660 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 695660 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits

renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 449.0147 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 524.3424 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1295.0129 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 538.2014 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1313.6365 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 540.9446 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.88412 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-21T06:24:53.3273298' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-21T11:24:53.3273298' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61304.4756172108 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-21T11:25:03.2329893' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61304.475731852 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.998225607613 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9998700452921 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 33.4569444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 53.6063888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.80989878978882 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 68.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 7.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.600608 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits :) Spent 0.553876 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-21T06:25:52.2557326' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-21T11:25:52.2557326' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61304.4762992477 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-21T11:26:02.1633662' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61304.4764139238 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.998225513164 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9998700897557 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 33.6244444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 53.6636111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.8019845344677 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 68.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 7.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.600608 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits :) Spent 0.538690 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits


fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461304.97573295 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:27.105 +46:00:06.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35 Second-epoch image center 09:36:27.105 +46:00:06.28 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0767 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:29.389 +45:59:25.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35 Second-epoch image center 09:36:29.389 +45:59:25.30 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0841 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:27.105 +46:00:06.28 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:29.389 +45:59:25.30 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01316 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NzFUpWFdW0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kEmP2OrG1l Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kCFkVa3RtR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6wIVmOIZIY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3113 to 155.8121 deg, Dec +39.8601 to +51.4110 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3113 to 155.8121 deg, Dec 39.8601 to 51.4110 deg Loaded 5371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3775 out of 3982 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3982 out of 8167 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.906500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.906500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3113 to 155.8121 deg, Dec +39.8601 to +51.4110 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3113 to 155.8121 deg, Dec 39.8601 to 51.4110 deg Loaded 5371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3775 out of 3982 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3982 out of 8167 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3113 to 155.8120 deg, Dec +39.8857 to +51.4193 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3113 to 155.8120 deg, Dec 39.8857 to 51.4193 deg Loaded 5368 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3781 out of 3990 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3990 out of 8217 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 15.7 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 15.2 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 15.2 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.NzFUpWFdW0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=568, bad_region=0, passed=8167 Got 8167 stars (including 7592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8167 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8167 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8167 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1234 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1311 n_q4=1168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.333 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.kEmP2OrG1l (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, bad_region=0, passed=8217 Got 8217 stars (including 7647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8217 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8217 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8217 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1221 n_q2=1194 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.286 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.kCFkVa3RtR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=325, bad_region=0, passed=6578 Got 6578 stars (including 6247 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6578 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6578 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6578 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6578 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4915 stars left (next iteration limit 5405) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=13.338 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.298 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.298 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=0.492 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.671 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.671 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=0.316 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.371 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.371 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4915 robust_rms_before=1.088 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.251 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.316 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.342 worst_region_rms_after=0.371 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.256 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.371 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.342 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.342 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.251 arcsec matched=4915 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=4915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.235 n_q1=1275 n_q2=1120 n_q3=1410 n_q4=1110 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.026 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.6wIVmOIZIY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, bad_region=0, passed=6505 Got 6505 stars (including 6159 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6505 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6505 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6505 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6505 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5404) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=13.296 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.280 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.280 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.457 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.749 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.749 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.292 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.334 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.334 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4912 robust_rms_before=1.107 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.261 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.292 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.339 worst_region_rms_after=0.334 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.274 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.334 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.339 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.261 arcsec matched=4912 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1277 n_q2=1107 n_q3=1415 n_q4=1113 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.333 ref2=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits sigma_overall=0.300 worst_q_ratio=1.286 new1=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.026 new2=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits sigma_overall=0.269 worst_q_ratio=1.077 reference average sigma_overall=0.3095 worst_q_ratio=1.3095 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_astrometric_residuals.png (4915 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 WARNING: the installed astorb.dat is only 24 bytes, far below the 30000000 bytes expected - it is incomplete and will be re-downloaded ######### Updating astorb.dat ######### ### download command ### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi curl --connect-timeout 10 --retry 1 --retry-delay 30 --speed-limit 100 --speed-time 30 --max-time 3600 --insecure --continue-at - --output astorb_dat_new.gz https://kirx.net/~kirx/vast_catalogs/astorb.dat.gz % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108.2M 0 507.7k 0 0 508.1k 0 03:38 03:38 508.2k 17 108.2M 17 18.66M 0 0 9.32M 0 00:11 00:02 00:09 9.32M 40 108.2M 40 43.75M 0 0 14.57M 0 00:07 00:03 00:04 14.58M 62 108.2M 62 67.24M 0 0 16.80M 0 00:06 00:04 00:02 16.80M 83 108.2M 83 90.78M 0 0 18.14M 0 00:05 00:05 18.14M 100 108.2M 100 108.2M 0 0 18.91M 0 00:05 00:05 18.14M 100 108.2M 100 108.2M 0 0 18.91M 0 00:05 00:05 18.14M 100 108.2M 100 108.2M 0 0 18.91M 0 00:05 00:05 18.14M TMP_OUTPUT=astorb_dat_new ### UNPACK_COMMAND ### We are currently at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi Will run the unpack command: gunzip astorb_dat_new.gz Unpack complete Moved astorb_dat_new to astorb.dat Successfully updated astorb.dat Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 08:55:28.19 +44:13:03.0: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:32:24.78 +44:15:51.9: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 08:55:28.19 +44:13:03.0: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:32:24.78 +44:15:51.9: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:55:28.19 +44:13:03.0: ref_mag=11.45 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5704 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:32:24.78 +44:15:51.9: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3160 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20516_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 20516_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    10.66    09:08:47.91 +42:09:22.1   1813 0837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits **** FOUND 09:08:47.90 +42:09:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20617_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 20617_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.47573    2461304.97573    11.58    08:55:28.17 +44:13:02.7   0399 2149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    11.56    08:55:28.21 +44:13:03.3   0395 2156   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20749_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 20749_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.47573    2461304.97573    12.28    09:32:24.80 +44:15:51.7   4413 2129   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    12.35    09:32:24.77 +44:15:52.1   4408 2136   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:27.105 +46:00:06.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35 Second-epoch image center 09:36:27.105 +46:00:06.28 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0767 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:29.389 +45:59:25.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35 Second-epoch image center 09:36:29.389 +45:59:25.30 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0841 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:27.105 +46:00:06.28 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:29.389 +45:59:25.30 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01316 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dYUecrZ5uE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.45WlMDU3dh Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nwQiReeQp9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4S8MjHC8xe Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1869 to 155.9247 deg, Dec +39.8064 to +51.4126 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1869 to 155.9247 deg, Dec 39.8064 to 51.4126 deg Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3552 out of 3993 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3993 out of 43830 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.804300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.804300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1869 to 155.9247 deg, Dec +39.8064 to +51.4126 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1869 to 155.9247 deg, Dec 39.8064 to 51.4126 deg Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3552 out of 3993 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3993 out of 43830 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=4.9) Read 43644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.2439 to 155.9246 deg, Dec +39.8187 to +51.4195 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.2439 to 155.9246 deg, Dec 39.8187 to 51.4195 deg Loaded 5438 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3552 out of 3999 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3999 out of 43644 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 2.0 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.9 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 15.9 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 15.3 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 15.3 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.dYUecrZ5uE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2151, bad_region=1, passed=43808 Got 43808 stars (including 41579 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43808 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43808 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43808 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43808 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1219 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1313 n_q4=1180 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.328 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.45WlMDU3dh (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2132, bad_region=2, passed=43630 Got 43630 stars (including 41413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43630 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43630 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43630 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43630 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.243 n_q1=1212 n_q2=1198 n_q3=1311 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.nwQiReeQp9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1156, bad_region=40, passed=32751 Got 32751 stars (including 31522 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32751 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32751 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32751 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32751 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5404) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=13.289 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.265 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.265 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.493 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.663 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.663 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.316 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.374 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.374 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4913 robust_rms_before=1.082 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.256 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.316 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.341 worst_region_rms_after=0.374 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.251 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.374 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.341 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.256 arcsec matched=4913 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.245 n_q1=1290 n_q2=1112 n_q3=1403 n_q4=1108 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.052 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.4S8MjHC8xe (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1476, bad_region=40, passed=33212 Got 33212 stars (including 31642 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33212 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33212 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33212 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33212 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5404) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=13.279 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.562 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.562 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.776 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.776 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.337 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.337 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4913 robust_rms_before=1.101 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.262 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.345 worst_region_rms_after=0.337 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.266 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.337 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.345 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.262 arcsec matched=4913 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1287 n_q2=1103 n_q3=1405 n_q4=1118 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:33:43.16 +47:30:50.3: 14.09 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:00:07.01 +42:15:42.6: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:40:45.12 +41:49:47.2: 14.35 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:14:49.47 +46:38:17.5: 14.05 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:42:56.11 +48:50:03.1: 14.79 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:06:38.23 +41:38:04.1: 14.79 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:52:01.81 +47:41:10.4: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:14:49.47 +46:38:17.5: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:00:07.01 +42:15:42.6: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:42:56.11 +48:50:03.1: 14.79 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:40:45.12 +41:49:47.2: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:33:43.16 +47:30:50.3: 14.02 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:14:49.47 +46:38:17.5: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1453 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:07.01 +42:15:42.6: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2435 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:06:38.23 +41:38:04.1: 14.63 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:42:56.11 +48:50:03.1: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6468 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:40:45.12 +41:49:47.2: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4504 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:33:43.16 +47:30:50.3: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9187 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:06:38.23 +41:38:04.1: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5036 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:53:06.58 +43:21:33.2: 15.69 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:52:01.81 +47:41:10.4: 14.47 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:52:01.81 +47:41:10.4: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5603 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:53:06.58 +43:21:33.2: 15.52 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.59 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:53:06.58 +43:21:33.2: ref_mag=15.59 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9607 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52858_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 52858_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.47573    2461304.97573    14.56    09:42:56.13 +48:50:03.0   5335 4942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    14.78    09:42:56.10 +48:50:03.2   5331 4948   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52859_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 52859_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.47573    2461304.97573    14.62    09:06:38.22 +41:38:03.8   1560 0518   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    14.43    09:06:38.23 +41:38:04.5   1556 0525   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52860_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 52860_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.47573    2461304.97573    14.45    09:40:45.06 +41:49:47.8   5412 0712   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    14.45    09:40:45.18 +41:49:46.5   5407 0719   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52864_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 52864_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.47573    2461304.97573    13.18    10:00:06.96 +42:15:42.3   7550 1182   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    13.32    10:00:07.05 +42:15:43.0   7546 1188   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53504_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 53504_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    13.31    09:05:24.30 +48:33:41.4   1594 4728   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits **** FOUND 09:05:24.32 +48:33:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53637_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 53637_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    13.59    08:56:24.38 +45:45:51.3   0565 3088   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits **** FOUND 08:56:24.41 +45:45:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53920_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 53920_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    13.69    10:05:53.85 +45:37:27.2   7888 3291   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits **** FOUND 10:05:53.83 +45:37:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53968_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 53968_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.47573    2461304.97573    13.86    09:33:43.18 +47:30:51.5   4461 4090   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    13.99    09:33:43.15 +47:30:49.0   4457 4096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54014_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 54014_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    13.86    09:44:57.68 +43:14:48.6   5808 1609   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits **** FOUND 09:44:57.67 +43:14:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54151_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 54151_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.47573    2461304.97573    14.15    09:14:49.48 +46:38:17.3   2531 3529   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    14.14    09:14:49.46 +46:38:17.7   2527 3536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54188_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 54188_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    14.15    09:22:31.52 +45:00:53.9   3337 2558   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits **** FOUND 09:22:31.54 +45:00:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54205_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 54205_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    14.21    08:55:33.94 +41:40:16.3   0288 0604   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits **** FOUND 08:55:34.20 +41:40:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54252_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 54252_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    13.96    09:39:41.64 +42:44:53.5   5252 1266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits **** FOUND 09:39:41.63 +42:44:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54709_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 54709_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.47573    2461304.97573    14.56    09:52:01.71 +47:41:10.4   6306 4336   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    14.56    09:52:01.91 +47:41:10.5   6302 4342   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54821_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 54821_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.47573    2461304.97573    14.86    09:53:06.44 +43:21:32.5   6697 1753   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-24-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    15.13    09:53:06.73 +43:21:33.8   6693 1760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07744_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 The candidate 07744_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 21.47641    2461304.97641    10.84    09:08:47.91 +42:09:22.2   1813 0837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-26_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_222200_TTUQ1b1x1_2277511_4A12M5zi/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_06-25-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits **** FOUND 09:08:47.91 +42:09:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461304.97573295 -observatory V36 13:01:10.92 -07:07:48.3 Mercury (-0.3mag) 14:04:48.46 -19:04:20.8 Venus (-4.8mag) 07:51:17.74 +21:50:43.9 Mars (1.2mag) 09:20:18.70 +16:08:52.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:48:07.57 +02:13:48.1 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:30.26 +21:01:32.9 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:12:21.00 -00:12:33.1 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:45.82 -23:42:12.7 Pluto (14.5mag) 19:54:36.66 -23:49:48.7 Moon (-11.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 27 00:00 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461304.97573295: 09:20:21.79 +16:08:36.9 Io (6.0mag) 09:20:15.08 +16:09:12.8 Europa (6.2mag) 09:20:30.13 +16:07:52.6 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:19:57.00 +16:10:44.2 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:18:43.23 +16:30:03.1 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:20:22.98 +16:08:32.0 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:18:06.32 +16:24:42.3 Elara (17.6mag) 09:23:45.72 +15:33:01.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:20:21.72 +16:30:35.7 Carme (18.9mag) 00:48:11.97 +02:14:02.2 Titan (8.3mag) 00:48:04.36 +02:13:31.0 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:47:43.12 +02:13:56.9 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:47:55.10 +02:13:24.2 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:46:40.78 +02:02:23.4 Phoebe (16.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 27 00:00 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461304.97573295: 00:05:52.17 +14:14:27.5 JWST 20:19:46.65 -29:41:21.8 Chandra 13:42:22.94 -62:16:52.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 27 00:00 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461304.97573295 -observatory V36 03:46:28.62 +19:52:30.3 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:09:42.93 -33:56:04.5 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:29:22.15 -71:07:46.7 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:42.14 +34:04:52.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:05:02.89 +47:12:57.3 16.4mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:02:52.64 +26:48:41.0 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:20:01.85 +25:43:39.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 11:02:25.73 +26:46:06.6 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:57:25.32 +05:09:12.4 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:17.21 -16:53:06.1 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:49:49.76 +33:52:00.4 16.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:09:07.48 +15:10:40.7 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:27:13.75 +42:31:18.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:08:27.30 +48:16:14.4 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:41:58.23 -13:15:28.0 14.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 11:41:30.79 +17:38:09.7 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:31:53.51 -01:02:58.4 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:25:08.25 +71:17:48.7 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:56:15.85 +45:25:13.2 17.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:26:35.30 +12:26:59.8 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:38:13.02 -34:52:23.6 13.8mag 10P/Tempel 01:41:27.02 +39:13:54.1 17.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:57:45.05 -06:33:39.0 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:37:06.85 -09:30:17.8 17.8mag 63P/Wild 07:05:17.14 +18:02:22.2 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:14:40.29 +14:59:02.2 16.8mag 88P/Howell 06:26:51.62 +33:51:53.3 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:12:12.77 +20:48:51.3 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:59:03.26 +17:46:45.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:18:37.74 -26:07:34.9 17.6mag 124P/Mrkos 06:33:22.92 +20:08:32.4 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 01:05:42.09 -13:44:40.5 14.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:36:24.32 +07:10:34.6 12.7mag 169P/NEAT 03:32:19.77 +07:04:19.3 14.6mag 220P/McNaught 05:24:08.12 +40:25:28.0 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 15:35:16.98 -01:48:59.4 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski 09:39:43.21 +16:08:16.3 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 27 00:00 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 27 00:00 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Sep 27 00:00 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 06:14:32.572 -24:42:19.36 AT 2026aaus 2026-09-04.79 19.93 06:10:08.738 -43:00:39.69 AT 2026aaur 2026-09-04.79 19.91 04:32:40.620 -40:57:11.51 AT 2026aauq 2026-09-04.72 19.78 04:16:08.060 -02:15:01.22 AT 2026aaup 2026-08-30.70 19.14 21:05:07.063 -18:02:34.69 AT 2026aauo 2026-08-30.59 19.75 23:45:38.204 -16:12:16.04 AT 2026aaun 2026-09-04.50 20.04 01:06:51.439 -11:55:59.53 AT 2026aaum 2026-09-04.57 20.03 22:55:49.384 -49:52:26.66 AT 2026aaul 2026-09-04.59 19.79 02:06:18.906 -16:24:37.27 AT 2026aauk 2026-09-03.73 19.72 01:45:01.907 -48:19:49.51 AT 2026aauj 2026-08-07.73 20.23 02:57:38.158 -36:56:04.66 AT 2026aaui 2026-08-22.76 20.46 02:11:30.245 -27:58:31.40 AT 2026aauh 2026-09-04.65 20.17 04:40:34.354 -44:14:37.62 AT 2026aaug 2026-08-27.77 19.45 01:43:40.711 -45:30:00.49 AT 2026aauf 2026-09-04.63 20.28 01:55:59.163 -14:46:35.57 AT 2026aaue 2026-09-03.74 19.86 23:46:22.482 -55:45:47.47 AT 2026aaud 2026-09-04.64 19.73 02:51:42.071 -40:00:46.34 AT 2026aauc 2026-09-04.66 20.14 04:00:56.503 -31:21:32.44 AT 2026aaub 2026-09-04.71 19.87 05:25:35.891 -32:38:44.36 AT 2026aaua 2026-09-04.75 19.59 05:38:05.780 -29:07:38.11 AT 2026aatz 2026-09-04.77 19.45 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 27 00:00 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 85 C