NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-05-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    11.35    23:54:25.88 -07:44:13.3   5719 1888   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    11.34    23:54:25.83 -07:44:12.9   5715 1893   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 21.3934  2461304.8934  11.35  23:54:25.85 -07:44:13.1
 85.44932 -66.36695 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
106 Dione                   -1     -0       1  11.5     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:25.85 -07:44:13.1:  15.31 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:25.85 -07:44:13.1:  15.34 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    11.88    23:40:57.16 -13:55:31.5   7448 5759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    11.91    23:40:57.09 -13:55:31.8   7444 5765   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 21.3934  2461304.8934  11.89  23:40:57.13 -13:55:31.7
 68.17841 -68.91292 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
118 Peitho                  -0      0       0  11.9     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:40:57.13 -13:55:31.7:  15.24 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:40:57.13 -13:55:31.7:  15.28 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    12.17    00:06:47.82 -05:26:07.9   3957 0384   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    12.17    00:06:47.80 -05:26:08.6   3952 0390   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 21.3934  2461304.8934  12.17  00:06:47.81 -05:26:08.3
 94.84367 -65.84277 galactic  Psc  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
217 Eudora                  -0      0       0  12.0     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:47.81 -05:26:08.3:  15.44 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:47.81 -05:26:08.3:  15.49 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    13.59    00:04:42.25 -11:10:56.1   4068 3863   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    13.53    00:04:42.24 -11:10:56.3   4063 3868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 21.3934  2461304.8934  13.56  00:04:42.24 -11:10:56.2
 86.12238 -70.63611 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1133 Lugduna                 -0      0       0  13.4    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:04:42.24 -11:10:56.2:  15.51 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:04:42.24 -11:10:56.2:  15.56 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 4

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q1b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 12135 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 12135 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits

renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1290.8213 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 523.6024 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1290.9125 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 522.7952 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.68643 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-21T04:25:51.0830369' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-21T09:25:51.0830369' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61304.3929523495 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-21T09:26:00.9851549' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61304.3930669562 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999743742284 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99949044089554 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 32.4808333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 227.997777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.85775260470736 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29544 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29544 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 66.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 298.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.0004 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits :) Spent 0.743046 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-21T04:26:41.6074422' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-21T09:26:41.6074422' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61304.3935371181 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-21T09:26:51.5135582' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61304.3936517709 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999743717318 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99949044156634 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 32.3511111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 228.188055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.86434353030735 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29544 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29544 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 66.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 298.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.0004 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits :) Spent 0.544368 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461304.89306809 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:06.582 -10:00:08.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:06.582 -10:00:08.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0252 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:04.685 -09:59:34.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:04.685 -09:59:34.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0195 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:06.582 -10:00:08.01 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:04.685 -09:59:34.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01211 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ww3g9XNeRi Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3Tkep8RtIk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sEGx7FwlXy Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HRUkciIWWd Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.82 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.82
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.1) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.6 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.3 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.8 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.Ww3g9XNeRi (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=0, passed=4374 Got 4374 stars (including 4092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3991 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0777, gap 8.0777 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 3991 stars left (next iteration limit 4390) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3991 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1080 n_q2=969 n_q3=999 n_q4=943 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.3Tkep8RtIk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=0, passed=4358 Got 4358 stars (including 4088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3988 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0776, gap 8.0776 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 3988 stars left (next iteration limit 4386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3988 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1022 n_q2=971 n_q3=1079 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.sEGx7FwlXy (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=331, bad_region=0, passed=5052 Got 5052 stars (including 4710 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5052 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6380 through 0 to 8.1975, gap 8.1975 to 351.6380 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4594 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4587 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4587 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4587 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5052 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6375 through 0 to 8.1981, gap 8.1981 to 351.6375 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4594 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4588 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5052 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4588 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5052 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4588 stars left (next iteration limit 5045) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4588 robust_rms=12.299 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.973 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4588 robust_rms=0.507 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.549 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4588 robust_rms=0.321 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.366 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4588 robust_rms_before=1.121 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.288 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.321 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.312 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.366 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.312 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits N_match=4588 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=1072 n_q2=1151 n_q3=1158 n_q4=1207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.HRUkciIWWd (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=333, bad_region=0, passed=5020 Got 5020 stars (including 4679 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5020 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6380 through 0 to 8.1599, gap 8.1599 to 351.6380 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4562 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4559 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4559 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4559 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5020 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6377 through 0 to 8.1604, gap 8.1604 to 351.6377 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4562 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4559 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5020 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4559 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5020 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4559 stars left (next iteration limit 5014) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4559 robust_rms=12.167 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.727 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4559 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.527 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4559 robust_rms=0.349 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.387 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4559 robust_rms_before=1.097 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.349 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.347 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.387 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.347 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits N_match=4559 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1082 n_q2=1154 n_q3=1140 n_q4=1183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.109 ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.078 new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits sigma_overall=0.295 worst_q_ratio=1.083 new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits sigma_overall=0.325 worst_q_ratio=1.100 reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.0935 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3991 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3988 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272_astrometric_residuals.png (4588 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273_astrometric_residuals.png (4559 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:25.85 -07:44:13.1: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:37.62 -07:49:20.8: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:37.62 -07:49:20.8: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:25.85 -07:44:13.1: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:37.62 -07:49:20.8: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8702 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20304.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20304_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 Preparing report for the candidate 20304_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20335_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 20335_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    11.87    00:14:37.61 -07:49:20.8   2706 1760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    11.87    00:14:37.62 -07:49:20.8   2701 1766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    10.20    00:02:07.40 -14:40:32.4   4315 5997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits **** FOUND 00:02:07.38 -14:40:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    10.77    00:13:45.93 -07:48:35.3   2830 1765   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits **** FOUND 00:13:45.93 -07:48:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 23:54:25.85 -07:44:13.1 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:06.582 -10:00:08.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:06.582 -10:00:08.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0252 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:04.685 -09:59:34.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:04.685 -09:59:34.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0195 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:06.582 -10:00:08.01 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:04.685 -09:59:34.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01211 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m9O87TCATi Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.chKOKE6IWB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.803UFTFNA4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K8h19SwmiR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.388800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.388800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.95 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.95
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.3) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 41 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.2 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 15.0 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits 15.4 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.m9O87TCATi (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=913, bad_region=0, passed=22729 Got 22729 stars (including 21779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22729 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0982, gap 8.0982 to 351.9463 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.chKOKE6IWB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=0, passed=23408 Got 23408 stars (including 22542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0899, gap 8.0899 to 351.9465 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.803UFTFNA4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=997, bad_region=39, passed=28356 Got 28356 stars (including 27271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28356 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6055 through 0 to 8.2158, gap 8.2158 to 351.6055 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28356 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6050 through 0 to 8.2163, gap 8.2163 to 351.6050 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28356 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28356 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5348) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=11.424 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.734 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.537 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=0.323 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.366 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4862 robust_rms_before=1.129 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.288 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.323 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.314 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.366 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.314 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1214 n_q2=1272 n_q3=1169 n_q4=1207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.K8h19SwmiR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1003, bad_region=40, passed=28685 Got 28685 stars (including 27586 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28685 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6000 through 0 to 8.1987, gap 8.1987 to 351.6000 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28685 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5997 through 0 to 8.1993, gap 8.1993 to 351.5997 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28685 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28685 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5348) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=11.327 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.753 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=0.474 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.524 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=0.347 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.382 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4862 robust_rms_before=1.110 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.311 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.347 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.345 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.382 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.345 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1197 n_q2=1274 n_q3=1174 n_q4=1217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:17:28.30 -10:23:33.1: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:56.46 -14:40:50.8: 13.17 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:24.61 -06:00:20.0: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:40:57.13 -13:55:31.7: 15.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:19.22 -12:45:01.0: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:07.03 -06:55:56.8: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:30:00.24 -09:52:27.9: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:41.50 -06:46:10.3: 14.04 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:36.27 -07:55:57.7: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:47.81 -05:26:08.3: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:36.27 -07:55:57.7: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:24.61 -06:00:20.0: 13.82 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:41.50 -06:46:10.3: 13.89 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:40:57.13 -13:55:31.7: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:30:00.24 -09:52:27.9: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:36.27 -07:55:57.7: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6835 delta=-0.77 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:24.61 -06:00:20.0: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2112 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:56.46 -14:40:50.8: 13.27 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:17:28.30 -10:23:33.1: 13.64 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:41.50 -06:46:10.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1872 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:56.46 -14:40:50.8: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2718 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:00.24 -09:52:27.9: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8105 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:19.22 -12:45:01.0: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:28.30 -10:23:33.1: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1551 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:19.22 -12:45:01.0: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7243 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:07.03 -06:55:56.8: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:07.03 -06:55:56.8: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7646 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:47.81 -05:26:08.3: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:45.77 -05:52:34.6: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:48.5: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.95 -06:31:08.1: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:51:01.60 -05:38:20.0: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:36.12 -10:20:03.3: 13.93 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:04:42.24 -11:10:56.2: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:34.45 -05:21:35.3: 13.73 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:58.31 -08:47:08.6: 13.35 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:48.5: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.95 -06:31:08.1: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:45.77 -05:52:34.6: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:51:01.60 -05:38:20.0: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:36.12 -10:20:03.3: 13.98 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:48.5: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2788 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.95 -06:31:08.1: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3929 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:34.45 -05:21:35.3: 13.62 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:45.77 -05:52:34.6: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5547 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:01.60 -05:38:20.0: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4321 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:36.12 -10:20:03.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9151 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:34.45 -05:21:35.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0943 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:04:42.24 -11:10:56.2: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:58.31 -08:47:08.6: 13.57 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:58.31 -08:47:08.6: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9920 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:09:28.87 -08:29:47.5: 13.74 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:04.65 -05:20:02.0: 14.18 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:36.80 -14:52:39.0: 14.14 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:14.18 -04:49:06.7: 14.49 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:18.81 -09:31:10.1: 13.84 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:29.27 -07:57:24.4: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.33 -09:01:10.9: 13.70 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:14.18 -04:49:06.7: 14.38 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:29.27 -07:57:24.4: 13.81 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:36.80 -14:52:39.0: 14.28 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:09:28.87 -08:29:47.5: 13.97 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:04.65 -05:20:02.0: 14.51 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:14.18 -04:49:06.7: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3847 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:29.27 -07:57:24.4: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2443 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:18.81 -09:31:10.1: 13.76 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:36.80 -14:52:39.0: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9322 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:28.87 -08:29:47.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0747 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:04.65 -05:20:02.0: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3957 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:18.81 -09:31:10.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0132 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.33 -09:01:10.9: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.33 -09:01:10.9: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0823 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:59.37 -08:18:31.9: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:39:31.71 -05:40:45.4: 14.58 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:53.87 -10:28:23.5: 14.46 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:30:42.96 -13:59:25.8: 14.09 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:36:11.96 -07:52:05.4: 14.70 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:28:38.62 -13:42:39.4: 14.13 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:04.11 -12:51:52.2: 14.42 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:53.87 -10:28:23.5: 14.49 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:53.87 -10:28:23.5: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3850 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:39:31.71 -05:40:45.4: 14.34 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:30:42.96 -13:59:25.8: 14.45 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:28:38.62 -13:42:39.4: 14.27 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:59.37 -08:18:31.9: 14.40 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:36:11.96 -07:52:05.4: 14.76 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:31.71 -05:40:45.4: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4017 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:42.96 -13:59:25.8: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0673 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:59.37 -08:18:31.9: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2874 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:38.62 -13:42:39.4: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9824 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:11.96 -07:52:05.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4210 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:04.11 -12:51:52.2: 14.51 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:04.11 -12:51:52.2: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3901 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:28:56.46 -10:05:41.3: 15.15 +/- 0.30 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:18.97 -14:40:18.0: 14.58 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:22:28.11 -13:43:49.4: 14.70 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:25:50.90 -14:34:52.5: 14.77 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:48.85 -13:17:41.0: 14.50 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:28:56.46 -10:05:41.3: 14.82 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:18.97 -14:40:18.0: 14.34 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.18 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:22:28.11 -13:43:49.4: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:56.46 -10:05:41.3: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.4463 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:18.97 -14:40:18.0: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2603 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:25:50.90 -14:34:52.5: 14.57 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:28.11 -13:43:49.4: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3200 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:50.90 -14:34:52.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.2844 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:48.85 -13:17:41.0: 14.90 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:48.85 -13:17:41.0: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3696 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32546.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32555.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32896.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32411_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32411_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.15    00:17:28.30 -10:23:33.1   2203 3288   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.16    00:17:28.30 -10:23:33.2   2198 3293   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32412_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32412_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.30    23:42:24.60 -06:00:20.0   7596 0963   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.14    23:42:24.61 -06:00:20.1   7591 0968   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32415_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32415_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.19    23:33:41.52 -06:46:10.3   8879 1520   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.19    23:33:41.49 -06:46:10.3   8874 1525   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32418_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32418_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    13.71    00:14:19.20 -12:45:00.8   2598 4732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    13.74    00:14:19.23 -12:45:01.2   2593 4738   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32420_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32420_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    13.30    00:26:56.38 -14:40:50.4   0672 5833   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    13.25    00:26:56.54 -14:40:51.2   0667 5839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32421_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32421_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    12.81    00:30:00.26 -09:52:28.3   0335 2892   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    12.81    00:30:00.22 -09:52:27.5   0330 2897   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32422_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32422_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    12.83    00:14:07.02 -06:55:57.2   2809 1227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    12.71    00:14:07.05 -06:55:56.4   2804 1232   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32423_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32423_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    12.69    23:43:36.26 -07:55:58.0   7327 2115   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    12.68    23:43:36.27 -07:55:57.5   7322 2121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32500_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32500_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    11.37    23:54:25.84 -07:44:13.0   5714 1893   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits **** FOUND 23:54:25.86 -07:44:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32546_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 Preparing report for the candidate 32546_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32555_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 Preparing report for the candidate 32555_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32611_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32611_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    12.55    23:59:45.77 -05:52:34.3   4996 0715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    12.55    23:59:45.77 -05:52:34.9   4991 0721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32620_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32620_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    12.54    00:05:10.84 -05:41:48.2   4185 0563   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits **** FOUND 00:05:10.85 -05:41:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32741_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32741_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    13.27    23:48:06.71 -07:36:48.7   6667 1876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    13.29    23:48:06.68 -07:36:48.2   6662 1881   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32758_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32758_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    13.34    23:52:48.95 -06:31:07.7   6010 1170   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    13.45    23:52:48.94 -06:31:08.4   6005 1175   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32778_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32778_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    13.43    23:51:01.58 -05:38:19.9   6316 0655   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    13.44    23:51:01.63 -05:38:20.1   6310 0660   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32896_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 Preparing report for the candidate 32896_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32999_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 32999_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    13.91    23:31:36.14 -10:20:02.9   9014 3704   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    13.92    23:31:36.10 -10:20:03.8   9009 3709   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33020_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33020_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.05    00:29:34.42 -05:21:35.3   0507 0144   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.15    00:29:34.48 -05:21:35.3   0501 0149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33024_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33024_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.01    23:35:58.32 -08:47:08.3   8433 2714   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    13.97    23:35:58.29 -08:47:08.8   8428 2720   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33059_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33059_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.02    23:56:18.84 -09:31:12.4   5369 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.01    23:56:18.79 -09:31:07.7   5364 2946   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33065_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33065_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.08    00:09:28.90 -08:29:47.6   3453 2209   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.07    00:09:28.84 -08:29:47.4   3448 2214   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33067_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33067_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    13.87    00:26:36.84 -14:52:38.5   0715 5955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.02    00:26:36.76 -14:52:39.5   0710 5961   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33105_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33105_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.28    23:31:04.65 -05:20:02.1   9354 0674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.61    23:31:04.65 -05:20:02.0   9348 0680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33106_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33106_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.22    23:35:29.31 -07:57:24.3   8547 2219   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.28    23:35:29.23 -07:57:24.4   8542 2224   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33117_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33117_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.31    23:35:14.16 -04:49:06.2   8744 0315   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.49    23:35:14.20 -04:49:07.2   8739 0321   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33122_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33122_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.15    00:00:47.35 -09:01:11.1   4725 2599   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.04    00:00:47.30 -09:01:10.8   4720 2604   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33123_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33123_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    13.99    00:28:38.64 -13:42:39.2   0444 5233   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    13.98    00:28:38.59 -13:42:39.5   0439 5238   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33124_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33124_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.38    23:39:31.72 -05:40:45.2   8048 0795   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.45    23:39:31.70 -05:40:45.6   8043 0800   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33172_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33172_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.06    00:30:42.95 -13:59:26.1   0126 5395   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.07    00:30:42.97 -13:59:25.6   0121 5400   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33176_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33176_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.28    23:43:59.36 -08:18:32.3   7253 2338   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.29    23:43:59.38 -08:18:31.5   7248 2343   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33186_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33186_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.31    23:36:11.96 -07:52:05.4   8444 2157   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.59    23:36:11.96 -07:52:05.3   8439 2163   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33254_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33254_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.34    23:35:53.89 -10:28:22.6   8362 3734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.44    23:35:53.84 -10:28:24.5   8357 3740   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33292_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33292_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.36    23:43:04.11 -12:51:52.1   7184 5092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.45    23:43:04.12 -12:51:52.3   7179 5097   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33314_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33314_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.42    00:28:56.38 -10:05:41.9   0491 3032   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.50    00:28:56.55 -10:05:40.8   0486 3038   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33324_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33324_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.25    00:22:28.01 -13:43:47.9   1363 5275   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.43    00:22:28.22 -13:43:51.0   1358 5281   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33345_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33345_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.26    00:29:19.04 -14:40:18.3   0318 5818   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.26    00:29:18.90 -14:40:17.7   0313 5823   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33374_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33374_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.36    23:48:48.85 -13:17:40.2   6320 5287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.39    23:48:48.85 -13:17:41.7   6315 5292   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33379_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 33379_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 21.39307    2461304.89307    14.27    00:25:50.89 -14:34:53.5   0837 5777   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-25-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    14.31    00:25:50.92 -14:34:51.5   0832 5783   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    10.30    00:02:07.40 -14:40:32.8   4315 5997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits **** FOUND 00:02:07.38 -14:40:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21120_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 The candidate 21120_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 21.39365    2461304.89365    10.82    00:13:45.93 -07:48:35.3   2830 1765   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-21_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042742_TTUQ1b1x1_2658821_fPvayi0S/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-21_04-26-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits **** FOUND 00:13:45.93 -07:48:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 23:54:25.85 -07:44:13.1 23:40:57.13 -13:55:31.7 00:06:47.81 -05:26:08.3 00:04:42.24 -11:10:56.2 ########### Completed Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 23:54:25.85 -07:44:13.1 23:40:57.13 -13:55:31.7 00:06:47.81 -05:26:08.3 00:04:42.24 -11:10:56.2 ################################################################################### 23:54:25.85 -07:44:13.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:40:57.13 -13:55:31.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:06:47.81 -05:26:08.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:04:42.24 -11:10:56.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461304.89306809 -observatory V36 13:00:44.03 -07:04:22.0 Mercury (-0.3mag) 14:04:40.82 -19:03:04.8 Venus (-4.8mag) 07:51:05.12 +21:51:11.5 Mars (1.2mag) 09:20:14.92 +16:09:09.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:48:08.96 +02:13:57.2 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:30.46 +21:01:33.4 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:12:21.52 -00:12:29.8 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:46.06 -23:42:12.1 Pluto (14.5mag) 19:49:44.08 -24:14:01.0 Moon (-11.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 21 04:31 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461304.89306809: 09:20:19.65 +16:08:45.0 Io (6.0mag) 09:20:12.65 +16:09:22.3 Europa (6.2mag) 09:20:27.20 +16:08:04.7 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:19:53.75 +16:10:58.0 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:18:39.18 +16:30:18.6 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:20:18.39 +16:08:52.5 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:18:02.38 +16:24:57.1 Elara (17.6mag) 09:23:42.14 +15:33:19.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:20:18.31 +16:30:50.9 Carme (18.9mag) 00:48:13.73 +02:14:10.7 Titan (8.3mag) 00:48:05.14 +02:13:41.2 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:47:44.70 +02:14:07.1 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:47:56.24 +02:13:34.0 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:46:42.23 +02:02:32.8 Phoebe (16.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 21 04:31 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461304.89306809: 00:05:26.92 +14:12:08.2 JWST 19:33:13.97 -10:52:27.4 Chandra 12:30:03.18 -62:01:30.4 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 21 04:31 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461304.89306809 -observatory V36 03:46:27.49 +19:52:21.6 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:09:39.87 -33:56:10.9 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:29:19.00 -71:07:28.1 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:42.04 +34:04:44.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:05:01.19 +47:12:26.2 16.4mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:02:56.07 +26:49:22.7 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:19:58.81 +25:43:44.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 11:02:21.25 +26:46:14.9 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:57:22.38 +05:09:14.1 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:17.42 -16:52:40.4 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:49:46.15 +33:51:37.0 16.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:09:06.33 +15:10:43.1 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:27:15.01 +42:31:34.5 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:08:32.81 +48:16:41.8 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:41:56.51 -13:15:22.4 14.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 11:41:22.27 +17:38:33.7 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:31:48.98 -01:02:33.6 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:24:50.41 +71:18:57.3 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:56:20.15 +45:25:35.0 17.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:26:30.54 +12:26:34.6 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:38:09.49 -34:52:55.7 13.8mag 10P/Tempel 01:41:21.93 +39:13:37.0 17.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:57:41.67 -06:33:15.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:36:56.81 -09:28:47.0 17.8mag 63P/Wild 07:05:08.72 +18:02:49.8 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:14:42.59 +14:59:06.6 16.8mag 88P/Howell 06:26:35.70 +33:50:08.6 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:11:59.28 +20:50:22.4 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:58:52.51 +17:47:51.3 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:18:26.14 -26:05:57.6 17.6mag 124P/Mrkos 06:33:17.87 +20:08:43.7 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 01:06:26.29 -13:47:16.8 14.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:36:18.07 +07:12:15.7 12.7mag 169P/NEAT 03:32:18.70 +07:04:53.1 14.6mag 220P/McNaught 05:23:56.91 +40:24:07.7 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 15:35:13.14 -01:48:27.3 18.0mag 391P/Kowalski 09:39:39.14 +16:08:30.7 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 21 04:31 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 21 04:31 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 21 04:31 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 18:37:01.440 +34:07:08.01 AT 2026aaid 2026-08-29.73 20.3 18:20:42.240 +36:32:22.01 AT 2026aaic 2026-08-29.73 20.25 18:22:14.640 +40:00:51.94 AT 2026aaib 2026-08-29.73 20.32 18:27:15.460 +42:18:52.04 AT 2026aaia 2026-08-29.72 20.64 18:21:59.150 +41:20:47.10 AT 2026aahz 2026-08-29.72 21.17 00:25:39.480 +42:47:23.08 AT 2026aahy 2026-08-26.72 20.4 01:04:53.450 +39:52:15.46 AT 2026aahx 2026-08-20.72 20.84 00:44:00.810 +43:14:46.59 AT 2026aahw 2026-08-20.72 21.08 22:51:34.110 +15:44:03.01 AT 2026aahv 2026-08-20.71 21.05 21:59:13.640 +10:22:20.47 AT 2026aahu 2026-08-19.62 21.45 22:12:02.290 +18:37:03.36 AT 2026aaht 2026-08-19.61 21.65 21:53:47.780 +17:31:23.29 AT 2026aahs 2026-08-19.61 20.93 22:21:10.910 +25:13:03.64 AT 2026aahr 2026-08-19.60 20.95 23:09:04.550 +23:33:02.89 AT 2026aahq 2026-08-18.73 21.24 23:54:21.700 +42:26:44.49 AT 2026aahp 2026-08-18.73 20.9 23:16:00.720 +40:22:41.13 AT 2026aaho 2026-08-18.72 20.65 17:32:19.490 +27:38:27.97 AT 2026aahn 2026-08-17.71 21.76 17:11:45.550 +22:13:10.66 AT 2026aahm 2026-08-17.71 21.23 17:07:03.110 +22:46:10.65 AT 2026aahl 2026-08-16.63 21.63 17:32:14.940 +21:27:26.95 AT 2026aahk 2026-08-16.63 21.52 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 21 04:31 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 96 C - WARNING