######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-10-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-10-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 188674 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 188674 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits_preview.png'
UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits

renamed 'UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits_preview.png'
UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 431.5825
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 529.1146
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1727.5719
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 480.9137
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1720.5485
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 479.3762
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.00288
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.3799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T05:46:38.0674790' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T10:46:38.0674790' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.4490517015 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T10:46:47.9709953' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.4491663193 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 161.996446735661 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 45.9995551937336 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.8452777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 44.2938888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.84817252301295 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.3799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.3799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 71.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits :)
Spent 0.653682 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T05:47:19.7059441' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T10:47:19.7059441' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.4495336227 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T10:47:29.6100191' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.4496482639 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 161.996446690364 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 45.999555235271 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9472222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 44.3636111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.82329154823695 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.5 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 71.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits :)
Spent 0.653935 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits

fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.94916744
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:04.299 +46:03:02.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34
Second-epoch image center 10:48:04.299 +46:03:02.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0500 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:06.258 +46:02:43.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34
Second-epoch image center 10:48:06.258 +46:02:43.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0464 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:48:04.299 +46:03:02.39
Second-epoch second image center 10:48:06.258 +46:02:43.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00763 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l5f9sutc7U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZUEMLS2u11
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wXOQKpaqNU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DLy3HLKSCW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.3878 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.3878 deg
Loaded 4562 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3121 out of 3300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3300 out of 6977 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.924200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.924200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.3878 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.3878 deg
Loaded 4562 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3121 out of 3300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3300 out of 6977 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6367 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.7463 to 174.3149 deg, Dec +40.3417 to +51.2581 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.7463 to 174.3149 deg, Dec 40.3417 to 51.2581 deg
Loaded 4272 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3192 out of 3282 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3282 out of 6367 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
2.4 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
14.2 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
14.2 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.l5f9sutc7U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=476, bad_region=1600, passed=6977
Got 6977 stars (including 5031 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4824 stars left (next iteration limit 5306)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=4824 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1486 n_q2=875 n_q3=1621 n_q4=842 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZUEMLS2u11 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, bad_region=1639, passed=6367
Got 6367 stars (including 4435 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6367 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4292 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4289 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4289 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4291 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4288 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4288 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4288 stars left (next iteration limit 4717)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=4288 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=1338 n_q2=864 n_q3=1337 n_q4=749 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wXOQKpaqNU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=6, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=159, bad_region=487, passed=2736
Got 2736 stars (including 2111 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2736 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2054 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2054 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2054 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2334 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2056 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2055 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2334 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2055 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2334 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 2055 stars left (next iteration limit 2259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2055 robust_rms=5.952 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.127 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2055 robust_rms=0.494 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.540 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2055 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.407 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2055 robust_rms_before=1.637 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.374 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.389 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.386 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.407
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.386 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits N_match=2055 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=694 n_q2=332 n_q3=708 n_q4=321 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.044
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DLy3HLKSCW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=198, bad_region=488, passed=2787
Got 2787 stars (including 2122 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2787 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2062 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2062 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2062 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2064 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2063 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2063 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 2063 stars left (next iteration limit 2268)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2063 robust_rms=5.899 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.621 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2063 robust_rms=0.469 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.507 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2063 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.377 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2063 robust_rms_before=1.603 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.363 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.377 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.377
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.377 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits N_match=2063 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=697 n_q2=337 n_q3=707 n_q4=322 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.004
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.125
ref2=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.083
new1=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.044
new2=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.004
reference average sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.104
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300_astrometric_residuals.png (4824 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183_astrometric_residuals.png (4288 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562_astrometric_residuals.png (2055 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563_astrometric_residuals.png (2063 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:04.299 +46:03:02.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34
Second-epoch image center 10:48:04.299 +46:03:02.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0500 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:06.258 +46:02:43.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34
Second-epoch image center 10:48:06.258 +46:02:43.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0464 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:48:04.299 +46:03:02.39
Second-epoch second image center 10:48:06.258 +46:02:43.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00763 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iljDuC2OTF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X8zEqUnlRP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RDRGV9MaWT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nAz2jLVNjc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.4075 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.4075 deg
Loaded 4576 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2959 out of 3310 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3310 out of 34182 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.810500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.810500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.04
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.77
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.77
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.4075 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.4075 deg
Loaded 4576 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2959 out of 3310 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3310 out of 34182 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 30481 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.6960 to 174.3149 deg, Dec +40.3147 to +51.2657 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.6960 to 174.3149 deg, Dec 40.3147 to 51.2657 deg
Loaded 4300 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3058 out of 3292 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3292 out of 30481 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 63 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
2.2 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
14.4 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
14.4 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.iljDuC2OTF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1513, bad_region=6370, passed=34166
Got 34166 stars (including 26567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34166 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4826 stars left (next iteration limit 5308)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=4826 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1477 n_q2=852 n_q3=1645 n_q4=852 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.X8zEqUnlRP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1294, bad_region=5941, passed=30466
Got 30466 stars (including 23568 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30466 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4808 stars left (next iteration limit 5289)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=4808 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=1523 n_q2=964 n_q3=1455 n_q4=866 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RDRGV9MaWT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=617, bad_region=1906, passed=16044
Got 16044 stars (including 13630 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16044 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4802 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=5.688 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.670 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=0.544 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=0.434 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.497 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4802 robust_rms_before=1.655 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.413 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.434 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.431 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.497
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.431 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits N_match=4802 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=1571 n_q2=690 n_q3=1772 n_q4=769 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nAz2jLVNjc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=544, bad_region=2016, passed=16102
Got 16102 stars (including 13674 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16102 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4806 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=5.667 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.880 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=0.518 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.536 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=0.416 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.434 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4801 robust_rms_before=1.632 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.402 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.416 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.417 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.434
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.417 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1570 n_q2=697 n_q3=1761 n_q4=773 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.021
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:21:13.19 +44:33:52.6: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:20:34.09 +46:35:21.7: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:16:31.94 +45:24:38.8: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:21:13.19 +44:33:52.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:20:34.09 +46:35:21.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:21:13.19 +44:33:52.6: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1832 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:34.09 +46:35:21.7: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1695 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:41:04.06 +48:35:11.4: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:16:31.94 +45:24:38.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:31.94 +45:24:38.8: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2977 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:41:04.06 +48:35:11.4: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:04.06 +48:35:11.4: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2406 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56748_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56748_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.55 | 10:16:14.25 +43:47:16.0 | 1272 2092 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56751_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56751_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.19 | 10:21:05.33 +47:33:29.1 | 2065 4304 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56752_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56752_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 19.44917 | 2461302.94917 | 13.17 | 10:21:13.21 +44:33:52.3 | 1875 2495 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.19 | 10:21:13.16 +44:33:52.9 | 1872 2498 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56753_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56753_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 19.44917 | 2461302.94917 | 13.17 | 10:20:34.11 +46:35:21.1 | 1947 3723 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.17 | 10:20:34.08 +46:35:22.3 | 1944 3726 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56755_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56755_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.01 | 10:59:42.58 +50:10:40.9 | 5987 5687 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
**** FOUND 10:59:42.57 +50:10:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56766_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56766_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 9.98 | 11:11:42.30 +43:53:56.0 | 7319 1924 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56768_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56768_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 10.35 | 10:39:21.70 +46:02:59.5 | 3875 3235 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56771_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56771_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 10.64 | 10:13:01.68 +44:22:26.2 | 0970 2491 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56774_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56774_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 10.39 | 11:09:44.61 +43:17:24.6 | 7119 1546 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56781_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56781_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 11.12 | 10:14:52.71 +41:34:51.6 | 0940 0773 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56782_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56782_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 10.77 | 11:09:56.52 +44:28:31.9 | 7113 2265 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
**** FOUND 11:09:56.48 +44:28:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56793_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56793_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 11.41 | 10:41:14.92 +44:21:28.5 | 4020 2204 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56798_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56798_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 11.64 | 10:11:44.27 +43:02:01.1 | 0711 1700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56805_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56805_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 11.88 | 10:12:13.67 +46:47:53.4 | 1093 3964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56806_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56806_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 11.81 | 10:11:53.45 +48:26:53.5 | 1201 4964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56815_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56815_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 12.11 | 10:09:54.87 +44:15:04.2 | 0620 2464 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56827_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56827_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 12.45 | 10:15:00.04 +49:25:02.6 | 1592 5505 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56843_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56843_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 12.61 | 10:22:08.66 +41:31:51.0 | 1764 0650 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
**** FOUND 10:22:08.67 +41:31:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56856_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56856_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 12.58 | 10:26:48.43 +49:47:03.9 | 2777 5588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56862_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56862_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 12.94 | 10:16:50.46 +49:29:11.6 | 1779 5522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56869_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56869_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 12.83 | 10:34:23.44 +45:28:43.1 | 3330 2923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56871_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56871_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 12.88 | 10:22:43.60 +42:02:23.5 | 1865 0953 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56876_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56876_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 12.74 | 11:04:06.86 +44:09:31.0 | 6488 2053 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56888_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56888_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.12 | 10:21:47.88 +48:00:45.6 | 2168 4570 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56894_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56894_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 19.44917 | 2461302.94917 | 13.24 | 10:16:31.93 +45:24:39.0 | 1435 3064 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.38 | 10:16:31.95 +45:24:38.7 | 1432 3067 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56897_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56897_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.15 | 10:16:34.67 +49:53:13.4 | 1784 5768 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56911_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56911_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.31 | 10:20:54.26 +47:37:44.3 | 2051 4349 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56916_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56916_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.22 | 10:38:01.45 +42:04:33.4 | 3587 0841 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56927_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56927_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.22 | 10:40:36.17 +50:04:40.2 | 4133 5663 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56941_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56941_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.25 | 10:27:52.88 +42:58:48.6 | 2500 1469 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
**** FOUND 10:27:52.86 +42:58:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56946_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56946_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 19.44917 | 2461302.94917 | 13.24 | 10:41:04.06 +48:35:12.2 | 4135 4754 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0562.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.24 | 10:41:04.05 +48:35:10.5 | 4132 4757 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56954_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56954_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.15 | 10:24:38.68 +41:57:27.4 | 2076 0882 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56977_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56977_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 12.99 | 11:07:56.74 +42:22:16.3 | 6939 0981 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56983_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56983_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.20 | 10:43:52.78 +46:12:45.6 | 4351 3311 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
**** FOUND 10:43:52.77 +46:12:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56988_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56988_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.01 | 10:56:20.76 +42:01:23.4 | 5642 0750 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
**** FOUND 10:56:20.78 +42:01:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56997_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 56997_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.25 | 10:18:35.59 +43:56:41.3 | 1542 2156 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57010_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57010_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.42 | 10:23:36.22 +46:15:12.4 | 2238 3489 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57020_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57020_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 12.88 | 11:09:29.76 +49:37:00.0 | 6950 5374 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57029_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57029_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.52 | 10:22:01.01 +48:46:19.0 | 2241 5026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57044_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57044_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.12 | 11:08:33.97 +45:36:19.4 | 6941 2942 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57056_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57056_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.26 | 11:08:36.61 +42:40:30.0 | 7007 1168 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57059_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57059_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.68 | 10:12:11.65 +48:05:33.6 | 1201 4745 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57073_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57073_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.44 | 11:01:08.93 +46:28:44.6 | 6151 3449 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57074_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57074_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.83 | 10:16:52.39 +46:25:42.6 | 1547 3676 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57075_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57075_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.47 | 10:25:04.79 +46:55:00.7 | 2433 3873 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57077_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57077_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.81 | 10:20:19.24 +49:34:31.5 | 2128 5532 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57078_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57078_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.82 | 10:09:54.62 +44:57:13.9 | 0684 2888 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57084_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57084_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.76 | 10:43:57.91 +48:56:08.5 | 4430 4955 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57085_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57085_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.55 | 10:35:38.36 +50:05:23.6 | 3652 5700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57086_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57086_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.86 | 10:25:44.66 +43:50:50.2 | 2316 2015 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57089_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57089_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.70 | 10:39:31.56 +45:24:05.0 | 3870 2843 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57105_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57105_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 14.15 | 10:14:58.31 +49:06:15.3 | 1564 5316 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57111_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57111_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.26 | 10:43:10.48 +43:14:42.1 | 4197 1522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57115_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57115_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.81 | 10:34:14.59 +41:47:46.1 | 3150 0697 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57130_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57130_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.97 | 10:10:21.56 +47:22:47.5 | 0951 4343 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57165_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57165_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.35 | 11:04:27.75 +42:09:24.1 | 6552 0840 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57170_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57170_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 14.03 | 10:13:11.15 +47:18:44.8 | 1236 4260 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57180_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57180_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.95 | 11:10:56.38 +42:37:02.8 | 7268 1143 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57182_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57182_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 14.18 | 10:13:49.44 +47:01:10.3 | 1277 4074 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57197_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57197_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 13.93 | 10:22:03.67 +45:48:47.4 | 2047 3241 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57199_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57199_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 14.12 | 11:07:05.99 +48:16:57.7 | 6738 4555 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57203_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57203_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 14.10 | 10:37:50.38 +46:29:03.4 | 3732 3506 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57216_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563
The candidate 57216_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.44965 | 2461302.94965 | 14.10 | 10:40:09.11 +49:36:33.4 | 4074 5381 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_054934_TTUQ2b1x1_4135069_ogtvYoTA/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_05-47-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0563.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.94916744 -observatory V36
12:50:09.87 -05:42:28.3 Mercury (-0.3mag)
14:01:44.12 -18:32:22.2 Venus (-4.8mag)
07:46:05.59 +22:02:04.8 Mars (1.2mag)
09:18:45.52 +16:15:42.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:48:40.62 +02:17:30.5 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:13:34.47 +21:01:43.4 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:12:33.29 -00:11:11.9 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:51.77 -23:41:55.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
18:09:17.82 -27:55:37.8 Moon (-10.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 19 05:51 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.94916744:
09:18:52.52 +16:15:07.4 Io (6.0mag)
09:18:46.63 +16:15:37.3 Europa (6.2mag)
09:18:56.39 +16:14:48.4 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:18:41.55 +16:16:03.2 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:17:03.40 +16:36:27.8 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:18:49.82 +16:15:22.4 Thebe (16.5mag)
09:16:29.18 +16:30:50.1 Elara (17.7mag)
09:22:17.19 +15:40:14.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:18:57.44 +16:36:52.2 Carme (18.9mag)
00:48:51.94 +02:17:24.6 Titan (8.3mag)
00:48:39.60 +02:17:34.2 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:48:21.24 +02:18:05.5 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:48:24.47 +02:17:26.6 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:47:15.60 +02:06:14.2 Phoebe (16.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 19 05:52 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.94916744:
23:47:33.86 +12:38:17.6 JWST
15:02:05.32 +52:12:28.3 Chandra
13:14:28.91 -62:23:39.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 19 05:52 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.94916744 -observatory V36
03:45:55.14 +19:48:50.2 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:08:31.52 -33:58:32.7 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:28:03.97 -71:00:22.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:16:38.21 +34:01:31.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
05:03:59.62 +47:00:33.1 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:04:17.54 +27:05:28.6 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:18:44.89 +25:45:41.3 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
11:00:36.13 +26:49:36.2 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:56:12.44 +05:09:52.1 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:27:25.40 -16:42:34.0 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:48:19.57 +33:42:49.0 16.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:08:40.50 +15:11:42.5 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:27:49.28 +42:37:31.2 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:10:45.15 +48:26:56.8 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:41:13.12 -13:13:16.3 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:14:50.89 +16:02:07.9 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:38:03.64 +17:48:03.2 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:30:03.94 -00:52:50.4 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:18:06.75 +71:44:54.2 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:57:55.71 +45:33:35.3 17.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:24:39.95 +12:16:49.6 17.6mag A/2026 E1
22:36:23.70 -35:01:40.6 13.7mag 10P/Tempel
01:38:22.34 +39:01:22.1 17.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
11:56:22.45 -06:24:05.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:33:02.12 -08:53:07.0 17.8mag 63P/Wild
07:01:46.50 +18:13:40.8 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:15:28.38 +15:00:35.8 16.8mag 88P/Howell
06:19:44.85 +33:08:42.8 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
08:06:39.50 +21:25:51.0 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:54:39.95 +18:13:47.3 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
13:13:56.66 -25:27:45.6 17.6mag 124P/Mrkos
06:31:15.78 +20:13:12.2 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
01:22:45.97 -14:42:26.9 14.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:34:08.91 +07:53:31.7 12.6mag 169P/NEAT
03:31:43.14 +07:17:57.5 14.6mag 220P/McNaught
05:19:18.43 +39:52:43.9 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
09:03:22.54 +34:17:29.8 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:33:44.60 -01:35:47.2 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:38:03.46 +16:14:15.1 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 19 05:51 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 19 05:51 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 19 05:51 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:45:20.862 -05:19:19.97 AT 2026aacc 2026-08-23.15 19.4444
15:56:38.169 +18:42:01.63 SN 2026aacb 2026-08-29.18 19.5538
20:55:37.041 -01:27:15.88 AT 2026aaca 2026-08-30.60 19.51
14:43:57.052 -18:28:53.81 SN 2026aabz 2026-08-30.23 18.705
13:37:12.730 -32:27:40.17 AT 2026aaby 2026-08-30.72 18.545
06:50:17.864 +20:05:46.74 AT 2026aabx 2026-08-30.61 17.869
05:36:22.321 -31:19:59.16 AT 2026aabw 2026-08-30.79 18.65
17:26:25.715 +35:28:47.48 AT 2026aabv 2026-08-30.35 18.678
03:41:51.198 -40:54:09.63 AT 2026aabu 2026-08-22.78 20.13
15:50:13.320 -33:32:57.31 AT 2026aabt 2026-08-29.37 19.72
01:18:28.460 -27:05:47.26 SN 2026aabs 2026-08-27.78 19.28
22:23:15.798 -29:48:02.93 AT 2026aabr 2026-08-30.57 19.11
23:23:45.523 -29:23:36.22 SN 2026aabq 2026-08-23.58 19.7
22:48:33.213 -45:12:00.11 AT 2026aabp 2026-08-30.61 18.75
00:44:54.260 +41:33:10.49 AT 2026aabo 2026-08-29.40 18.5784
01:36:46.683 +30:41:53.77 AT 2026aabn 2026-08-28.69 20.82
01:39:53.640 +34:03:40.40 AT 2026aabm 2026-08-26.73 20.83
00:25:36.720 +41:26:16.16 AT 2026aabl 2026-08-26.72 20.57
00:06:22.110 +41:47:11.52 AT 2026aabk 2026-08-23.72 21.3
16:34:18.591 +32:50:04.19 AT 2026aabj 2026-08-23.59 21.08
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 19 05:51 tns_transients_list.txt