NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-10-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
Field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-10-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-10-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-10-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 191287 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 191287 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits_preview.png'
UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits

renamed 'UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits_preview.png'
UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 431.5825 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 529.1146 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1839.5094 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 520.9355 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1831.5114 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 520.2768 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.26224 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T05:46:13.0384913' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T10:46:13.0384913' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.448762014 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T10:46:22.9431328' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.4488766552 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 161.996445872367 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 46.0001107489663 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.7855555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 44.2522222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.8629028447657 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29537 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29537 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 71.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/d_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits :) Spent 0.531104 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/d_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T05:46:57.4323768' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T10:46:57.4323768' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.4492758336 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T10:47:07.3335104' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.4493904281 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 161.99644582491 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 46.0001107924844 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.8922222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 44.3255555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.83667409461647 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29537 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29537 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 71.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/d_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits :) Spent 0.534694 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/d_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits


fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.94887775 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits Image size: 945.2'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:04.121 +46:00:38.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 Second-epoch image center 10:48:04.121 +46:00:38.83 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0124 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Image size: 945.1'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:05.530 +46:00:17.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 Second-epoch image center 10:48:05.530 +46:00:17.84 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0128 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:48:04.121 +46:00:38.83 Second-epoch second image center 10:48:05.530 +46:00:17.84 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00711 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PDVmPxctYO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e1tTXveugj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ppoRSr6c8T Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rTSJ4BZ9dL Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.3878 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.3878 deg Loaded 4562 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3121 out of 3300 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3300 out of 6977 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.930600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.930600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.3878 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.3878 deg Loaded 4562 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3121 out of 3300 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3300 out of 6977 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 6367 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.7463 to 174.3149 deg, Dec +40.3417 to +51.2581 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.7463 to 174.3149 deg, Dec 40.3417 to 51.2581 deg Loaded 4272 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3192 out of 3282 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3282 out of 6367 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 2.4 pix UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 14.2 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits 14.2 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.PDVmPxctYO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=476, bad_region=0, passed=6977 Got 6977 stars (including 6493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=1167 n_q2=1200 n_q3=1294 n_q4=1191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.e1tTXveugj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, bad_region=0, passed=6367 Got 6367 stars (including 6003 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6367 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6367 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6367 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6367 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5340) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=1162 n_q2=1340 n_q3=1157 n_q4=1195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.ppoRSr6c8T (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=173, bad_region=0, passed=2872 Got 2872 stars (including 2693 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2872 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2612 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2611 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2611 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2611 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2872 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2612 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2611 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2872 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2611 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2872 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 2611 stars left (next iteration limit 2872) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2611 robust_rms=9.565 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.281 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2611 robust_rms=0.471 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.881 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2611 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.530 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2611 robust_rms_before=1.667 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.329 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.443 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.530 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.443 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits N_match=2611 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=699 n_q2=539 n_q3=774 n_q4=599 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.340 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.rTSJ4BZ9dL (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=181, bad_region=0, passed=2902 Got 2902 stars (including 2718 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2902 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2641 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2640 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2640 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2642 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2641 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2641 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 2641 stars left (next iteration limit 2904) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2641 robust_rms=9.593 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.130 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2641 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.758 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2641 robust_rms=0.356 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.447 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2641 robust_rms_before=1.681 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.324 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.356 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.415 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.447 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.415 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits N_match=2641 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=723 n_q2=533 n_q3=776 n_q4=609 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.188 ref2=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits sigma_overall=0.408 worst_q_ratio=1.100 new1=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.340 new2=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits sigma_overall=0.346 worst_q_ratio=1.236 reference average sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.144 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300_astrometric_residuals.png (4852 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183_astrometric_residuals.png (4854 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498_astrometric_residuals.png (2611 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499_astrometric_residuals.png (2641 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits Image size: 945.2'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:04.121 +46:00:38.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 Second-epoch image center 10:48:04.121 +46:00:38.83 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0124 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Image size: 945.1'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:05.530 +46:00:17.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 Second-epoch image center 10:48:05.530 +46:00:17.84 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0128 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:48:04.121 +46:00:38.83 Second-epoch second image center 10:48:05.530 +46:00:17.84 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00711 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dAn2hC2O7r Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sjriTWOtfa Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qn6hY0QN7M Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits &> /tmp/tmp.75E9chumUx Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.4075 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.4075 deg Loaded 4576 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2959 out of 3310 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3310 out of 34182 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.821100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.821100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.73 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.4075 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.4075 deg Loaded 4576 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2959 out of 3310 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3310 out of 34182 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 30481 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.6960 to 174.3149 deg, Dec +40.3147 to +51.2657 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.6960 to 174.3149 deg, Dec 40.3147 to 51.2657 deg Loaded 4300 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3058 out of 3292 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3292 out of 30481 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 113 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 2.2 pix UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 14.4 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits 14.4 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.dAn2hC2O7r (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1513, bad_region=9, passed=34161 Got 34161 stars (including 32570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34161 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4851 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5336) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=1144 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1293 n_q4=1215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.sjriTWOtfa (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1294, bad_region=0, passed=30460 Got 30460 stars (including 29132 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4849 stars left (next iteration limit 5335) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=4849 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1174 n_q2=1335 n_q3=1141 n_q4=1199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Qn6hY0QN7M (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=411, bad_region=26, passed=16817 Got 16817 stars (including 16362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16817 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16817 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16817 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16817 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4840 stars left (next iteration limit 5322) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4840 robust_rms=8.880 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.614 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4840 robust_rms=0.496 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.908 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4840 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.567 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4840 robust_rms_before=1.664 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.439 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.567 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.439 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits N_match=4840 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=1359 n_q2=894 n_q3=1514 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.75E9chumUx (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=560, bad_region=30, passed=17088 Got 17088 stars (including 16463 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17088 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4832 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17088 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17088 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17088 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4831 stars left (next iteration limit 5314) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=8.802 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.097 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.615 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.481 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4831 robust_rms_before=1.698 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.347 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.418 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.481 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.418 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits N_match=4831 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=1350 n_q2=903 n_q3=1510 n_q4=1068 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:21:13.18 +44:33:53.2: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:09:28.60 +46:26:28.9: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:21:13.18 +44:33:53.2: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 11:09:28.60 +46:26:28.9: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:21:13.18 +44:33:53.2: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2530 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:28.60 +46:26:28.9: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7353 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:43:52.82 +46:12:45.7: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:43:52.82 +46:12:45.7: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:43:52.82 +46:12:45.7: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2525 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:17:44.52 +44:22:11.6: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:17:44.52 +44:22:11.6: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:44.52 +44:22:11.6: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9524 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52141_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52141_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.44888    2461302.94888    13.74    11:09:28.60 +46:26:28.2   6982 3660   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.73    11:09:28.60 +46:26:29.6   6980 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52147_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52147_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.31    10:20:34.01 +46:35:22.5   1920 3504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits **** FOUND 10:20:34.00 +46:35:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52148_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52148_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.44888    2461302.94888    13.25    10:21:13.14 +44:33:53.6   1957 2276   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.26    10:21:13.22 +44:33:52.7   1954 2279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52187_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52187_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    10.54    10:07:18.62 +49:06:57.0   0641 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52189_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52189_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    10.53    10:03:43.28 +46:00:06.8   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52191_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52191_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    10.33    10:32:40.46 +50:08:11.9   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52218_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52218_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    10.71    11:09:56.48 +44:28:31.5   7174 2494   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits **** FOUND 11:09:56.47 +44:28:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52234_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52234_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    11.03    10:49:17.58 +41:38:43.1   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52255_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52255_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    11.59    10:44:17.96 +50:30:18.7   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52261_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52261_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    11.47    10:55:55.05 +43:25:41.2   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52265_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52265_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    11.65    10:55:02.28 +49:37:40.1   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52276_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52276_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.07    10:09:00.93 +40:55:57.4   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52277_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52277_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    11.70    10:48:45.76 +43:10:57.7   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52280_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52280_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.11    10:14:34.64 +43:17:58.6   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52293_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52293_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    11.89    10:46:39.97 +40:54:00.8   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52302_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52302_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    11.66    11:17:50.20 +42:34:34.9   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52333_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52333_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    11.90    11:22:38.68 +43:28:31.7   8631 2097   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits **** FOUND 11:22:38.71 +43:28:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52335_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52335_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.01    11:13:08.12 +45:46:17.6   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52337_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52337_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.23    11:16:46.05 +49:26:50.0   7470 5567   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits **** FOUND 11:16:46.05 +49:26:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52339_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52339_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.41    10:41:15.60 +48:57:09.5   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52355_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52355_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.15    10:03:32.49 +49:55:54.8   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52357_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52357_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.04    10:08:24.52 +49:40:54.9   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52370_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52370_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.01    10:03:43.39 +48:30:06.4   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52373_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52373_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.83    10:04:49.80 +48:02:54.3   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52378_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52378_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.74    10:39:06.62 +49:02:36.2   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52382_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52382_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.85    10:19:29.28 +42:29:20.6   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52384_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52384_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.72    10:37:29.98 +42:41:44.8   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52387_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52387_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.92    10:13:43.38 +41:06:20.5   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52391_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52391_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.07    10:09:23.38 +46:06:52.7   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52392_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52392_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.16    11:22:40.16 +41:46:54.2   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52399_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52399_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.13    10:05:26.82 +46:52:06.1   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52401_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52401_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.27    11:27:02.83 +43:28:07.9   9112 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52405_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52405_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.10    10:15:53.16 +45:25:08.8   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52409_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52409_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.96    10:38:09.73 +47:54:37.0   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52422_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52422_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.28    10:05:59.57 +44:14:32.7   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52424_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52424_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.21    11:25:08.86 +41:24:18.0   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52426_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52426_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.92    10:54:12.66 +49:52:55.6   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52428_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52428_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.11    10:13:24.67 +44:28:46.1   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52450_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52450_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.17    10:35:45.49 +50:42:57.8   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52466_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52466_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.63    11:31:02.99 +48:46:55.1   8943 5424   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits **** FOUND 11:31:03.00 +48:46:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52474_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52474_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.06    10:32:37.66 +42:01:28.2   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52477_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52477_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.40    10:04:19.41 +46:05:51.7   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52478_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52478_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.21    10:21:22.49 +41:16:56.6   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52482_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52482_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.31    10:27:52.79 +42:58:47.7   2665 1312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits **** FOUND 10:27:52.80 +42:58:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52483_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52483_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.55    10:18:44.48 +48:55:00.6   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52484_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52484_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.71    11:20:39.60 +45:00:35.1   8270 2978   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits **** FOUND 11:20:39.54 +45:00:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52485_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52485_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.88    11:32:14.52 +49:52:19.4   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52487_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52487_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.33    10:23:50.23 +47:48:55.5   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52489_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52489_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.10    10:50:44.28 +43:34:11.9   5158 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52497_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52497_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.44888    2461302.94888    13.16    10:43:52.81 +46:12:46.2   4348 3294   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.40    10:43:52.83 +46:12:45.3   4345 3297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52499_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52499_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.59    10:06:38.33 +42:52:44.6   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52501_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52501_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.32    10:11:50.23 +42:54:08.2   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52505_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52505_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.86    11:21:40.27 +42:53:10.1   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52506_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52506_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.40    10:14:35.66 +42:33:21.7   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52507_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52507_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.45    10:19:26.36 +50:04:09.9   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52518_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52518_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.38    10:16:12.39 +50:13:48.2   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52527_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52527_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.45    10:59:58.42 +48:36:21.7   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52531_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52531_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.58    10:12:50.02 +46:31:16.6   1110 3496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52535_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52535_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.62    11:29:24.61 +45:36:06.2   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52538_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52538_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.66    10:09:24.26 +48:17:29.7   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52543_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52543_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    12.99    10:56:20.87 +42:01:24.0   5843 0866   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits **** FOUND 10:56:20.82 +42:01:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52544_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52544_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.67    10:05:54.02 +45:37:26.7   0339 2999   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits **** FOUND 10:05:53.95 +45:37:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52559_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52559_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.48    10:10:19.80 +42:58:44.0   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52566_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52566_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.60    10:34:11.18 +50:32:35.5   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52567_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52567_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.64    10:29:17.25 +50:56:31.7   2831 6124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52568_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52568_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.06    11:11:21.83 +42:51:39.3   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52572_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52572_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.33    11:16:57.62 +42:59:56.5   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52585_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52585_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.17    10:54:27.53 +41:04:18.0   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52592_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52592_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.17    11:24:54.59 +49:40:08.2   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52597_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52597_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.14    10:12:55.49 +49:23:53.5   1212 5239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52600_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52600_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.57    10:46:47.91 +51:04:55.2   4494 6248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52601_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52601_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.26    10:54:39.81 +43:20:00.4   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52608_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52608_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.24    11:29:58.73 +46:35:59.1   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52624_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52624_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.18    11:21:37.64 +47:09:40.7   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52630_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52630_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.32    11:11:21.35 +43:14:59.2   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52655_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52655_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.89    10:15:54.04 +48:11:47.6   1476 4494   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52661_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52661_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.23    11:34:29.58 +49:36:25.4   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52671_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52671_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.00    11:27:41.42 +43:40:25.2   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52680_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52680_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.94    10:20:33.61 +49:16:51.1   1967 5132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52689_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52689_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.85    10:13:17.34 +44:19:53.3   1087 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52691_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52691_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.94    10:26:53.17 +50:15:39.9   2598 5712   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52694_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52694_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.56    10:07:58.46 +50:04:14.2   0747 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52719_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52719_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.44888    2461302.94888    13.91    10:17:44.50 +44:22:12.3   1576 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.01    10:17:44.55 +44:22:10.8   1573 2172   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52726_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52726_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.68    10:39:17.68 +45:08:42.8   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52727_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52727_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.96    10:21:39.35 +45:39:44.0   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52740_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52740_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.69    10:04:52.61 +43:57:24.5   0147 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52742_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52742_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.08    10:36:26.50 +41:10:53.0   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52747_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52747_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.23    10:27:46.67 +43:31:18.8   2656 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52754_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52754_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.70    10:34:33.99 +46:53:17.6   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52788_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52788_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.20    10:22:04.58 +47:57:32.4   2098 4327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52814_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52814_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.42    10:32:31.94 +47:49:18.0   3157 4234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52850_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52850_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.02    10:28:14.76 +47:14:37.8   2721 3885   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52857_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52857_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.92    11:06:43.49 +44:51:38.8   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52859_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52859_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.05    10:32:46.44 +44:08:52.9   3200 2021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52860_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52860_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.93    10:07:19.40 +44:19:39.2   0434 2202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52884_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52884_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.03    10:14:17.12 +41:32:35.4   1108 0468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52885_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52885_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.11    10:29:29.35 +47:55:51.0   2849 4299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52887_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52887_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.02    10:43:37.99 +47:17:16.1   4292 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52890_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52890_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.25    10:22:37.85 +48:45:23.0   2165 4808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52892_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52892_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.20    10:31:49.24 +48:23:32.9   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52894_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52894_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.33    11:28:55.62 +45:21:28.3   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52903_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52903_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.88    10:34:05.92 +44:19:01.6   3342 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52906_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52906_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.74    11:21:11.59 +46:38:02.8   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52911_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52911_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.95    10:39:17.39 +45:56:12.8   3873 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52913_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52913_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.08    10:53:43.49 +45:48:10.2   5384 3114   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52918_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52918_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.77    11:13:53.66 +43:05:41.6   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52922_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52922_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.21    10:28:33.13 +49:07:09.6   2757 5018   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52923_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52923_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.45    10:08:59.15 +43:19:54.4   0575 1586   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52924_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52924_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.36    10:29:15.16 +45:53:48.7   2822 3073   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52930_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52930_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.95    10:49:13.32 +47:01:21.3   4870 3813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52931_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 52931_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    14.35    10:48:38.52 +44:56:20.5   4883 2559   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50047_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 50047_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.29    10:23:02.94 +47:25:46.7   2190 4005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits **** FOUND 10:23:02.94 +47:25:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24299_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 The candidate 24299_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 19.44939    2461302.94939    13.73    10:22:03.03 +46:51:41.5   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_054744_TTUQ1b1x1_3972128_HUjFw3Lr/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_05-46-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-10-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.94887775 -observatory V36 12:50:09.77 -05:42:27.5 Mercury (-0.3mag) 14:01:44.09 -18:32:21.9 Venus (-4.8mag) 07:46:05.55 +22:02:04.9 Mars (1.2mag) 09:18:45.51 +16:15:43.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:48:40.63 +02:17:30.6 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:34.47 +21:01:43.4 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:12:33.29 -00:11:11.9 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:51.77 -23:41:55.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 18:09:16.61 -27:55:39.9 Moon (-10.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 19 05:48 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.94887775: 09:18:52.51 +16:15:07.5 Io (6.0mag) 09:18:46.61 +16:15:37.4 Europa (6.2mag) 09:18:56.37 +16:14:48.5 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:18:41.54 +16:16:03.2 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:17:03.39 +16:36:27.8 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:18:49.81 +16:15:22.5 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:16:29.17 +16:30:50.2 Elara (17.7mag) 09:22:17.17 +15:40:14.8 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:18:57.43 +16:36:52.2 Carme (18.9mag) 00:48:51.95 +02:17:24.6 Titan (8.3mag) 00:48:39.61 +02:17:34.2 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:48:21.25 +02:18:05.6 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:48:24.48 +02:17:26.6 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:47:15.60 +02:06:14.3 Phoebe (16.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 19 05:49 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.94887775: 23:47:33.76 +12:38:17.0 JWST 15:01:57.55 +52:12:38.9 Chandra 13:14:13.54 -62:23:38.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 19 05:48 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.94887775 -observatory V36 03:45:55.14 +19:48:50.2 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:08:31.51 -33:58:32.7 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:28:03.95 -71:00:22.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:38.21 +34:01:30.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:03:59.61 +47:00:33.0 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:04:17.55 +27:05:28.7 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:18:44.88 +25:45:41.3 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 11:00:36.11 +26:49:36.2 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:56:12.43 +05:09:52.1 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:25.40 -16:42:33.9 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:48:19.56 +33:42:48.9 16.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:08:40.50 +15:11:42.5 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:27:49.28 +42:37:31.2 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:10:45.17 +48:26:56.9 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:41:13.12 -13:13:16.3 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:14:50.89 +16:02:08.1 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:38:03.61 +17:48:03.3 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:30:03.93 -00:52:50.3 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:18:06.69 +71:44:54.4 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:57:55.72 +45:33:35.4 17.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:24:39.93 +12:16:49.5 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:36:23.69 -35:01:40.7 13.7mag 10P/Tempel 01:38:22.31 +39:01:22.0 17.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:56:22.43 -06:24:05.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:33:02.09 -08:53:06.7 17.8mag 63P/Wild 07:01:46.47 +18:13:40.9 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:15:28.39 +15:00:35.8 16.8mag 88P/Howell 06:19:44.79 +33:08:42.4 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:06:39.45 +21:25:51.3 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:54:39.91 +18:13:47.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:13:56.62 -25:27:45.3 17.6mag 124P/Mrkos 06:31:15.76 +20:13:12.2 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 01:22:46.11 -14:42:27.4 14.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:34:08.89 +07:53:32.1 12.6mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:43.14 +07:17:57.6 14.6mag 220P/McNaught 05:19:18.39 +39:52:43.6 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 09:03:22.49 +34:17:30.0 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:33:44.59 -01:35:47.1 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:38:03.45 +16:14:15.1 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 19 05:48 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 19 05:48 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 19 05:48 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:45:20.862 -05:19:19.97 AT 2026aacc 2026-08-23.15 19.4444 15:56:38.169 +18:42:01.63 SN 2026aacb 2026-08-29.18 19.5538 20:55:37.041 -01:27:15.88 AT 2026aaca 2026-08-30.60 19.51 14:43:57.052 -18:28:53.81 SN 2026aabz 2026-08-30.23 18.705 13:37:12.730 -32:27:40.17 AT 2026aaby 2026-08-30.72 18.545 06:50:17.864 +20:05:46.74 AT 2026aabx 2026-08-30.61 17.869 05:36:22.321 -31:19:59.16 AT 2026aabw 2026-08-30.79 18.65 17:26:25.715 +35:28:47.48 AT 2026aabv 2026-08-30.35 18.678 03:41:51.198 -40:54:09.63 AT 2026aabu 2026-08-22.78 20.13 15:50:13.320 -33:32:57.31 AT 2026aabt 2026-08-29.37 19.72 01:18:28.460 -27:05:47.26 SN 2026aabs 2026-08-27.78 19.28 22:23:15.798 -29:48:02.93 AT 2026aabr 2026-08-30.57 19.11 23:23:45.523 -29:23:36.22 SN 2026aabq 2026-08-23.58 19.7 22:48:33.213 -45:12:00.11 AT 2026aabp 2026-08-30.61 18.75 00:44:54.260 +41:33:10.49 AT 2026aabo 2026-08-29.40 18.5784 01:36:46.683 +30:41:53.77 AT 2026aabn 2026-08-28.69 20.82 01:39:53.640 +34:03:40.40 AT 2026aabm 2026-08-26.73 20.83 00:25:36.720 +41:26:16.16 AT 2026aabl 2026-08-26.72 20.57 00:06:22.110 +41:47:11.52 AT 2026aabk 2026-08-23.72 21.3 16:34:18.591 +32:50:04.19 AT 2026aabj 2026-08-23.59 21.08 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 19 05:48 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 96 C - WARNING