This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.4158 2461302.9158 10.52 05:34:33.44 -05:22:11.8
208.90641 -19.53428 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.1" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" [H97b] 25
Type: TTS/ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.120 I Y 0.050 I 2.280000000000
ATTENTION: measured mag 10.52 is 4.5 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 15.07 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:34:33.44 -05:22:11.8: 13.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:34:33.44 -05:22:11.8: 13.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.4158* 05 34 33.44 -05 22 11.8 10.5 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
[H97b] 25,2461302.9158,10.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
[H97b] 25 20260919.4158 10.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.4158 2461302.9158 12.84 05:03:25.23 -13:06:58.8
212.95320 -29.80434 galactic Lep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.183 Istria -0 -0 0 12.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:03:25.23 -13:06:58.8: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:03:25.23 -13:06:58.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.9158,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.4158 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.70038179 18.01.2026 04:48:22.987 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
First image: 2461058.70038179 18.01.2026 04:48:22.987 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Last image: 2461302.91613735 19.09.2026 09:59:04.267 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 19
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10398
Objects passed selection criteria: 10386
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9493.75
Average stars matched: 9268 (97.6221 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236100 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 05:01:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.70038179 18.01.2026 04:48:22.987 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
First image: 2461058.70038179 18.01.2026 04:48:22.987 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Last image: 2461302.91613735 19.09.2026 09:59:04.267 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 60
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 63780
Objects passed selection criteria: 63633
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 58420.5
Average stars matched: 56128.8 (96.0771 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 282176 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 05:02:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.91555667
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:45.579 -09:58:53.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39
Second-epoch image center 05:08:45.579 -09:58:53.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0541 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:46.417 -09:58:22.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39
Second-epoch image center 05:08:46.417 -09:58:22.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0613 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:45.579 -09:58:53.99
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:46.417 -09:58:22.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00938 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Avbmcefx7t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BEopSUmXB4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6SNfY2IqBW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o8XX68xDtM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1320 to 85.3599 deg, Dec -15.3183 to -4.5790 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1320 to 85.3599 deg, Dec -15.3183 to -4.5790 deg
Loaded 8249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6415 out of 6782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6782 out of 10760 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1320 to 85.3599 deg, Dec -15.3183 to -4.5790 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1320 to 85.3599 deg, Dec -15.3183 to -4.5790 deg
Loaded 8249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6415 out of 6782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6782 out of 10760 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 10560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1304 to 85.3494 deg, Dec -15.3101 to -4.5585 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1304 to 85.3494 deg, Dec -15.3101 to -4.5585 deg
Loaded 8259 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6348 out of 6710 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6710 out of 10560 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.0 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
2.4 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
2.4 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
15.2 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Avbmcefx7t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=939, bad_region=0, passed=10760
Got 10760 stars (including 9804 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10760 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.245 n_q1=1330 n_q2=1245 n_q3=1260 n_q4=1057 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.276
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BEopSUmXB4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=913, bad_region=0, passed=10560
Got 10560 stars (including 9639 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10560 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1318 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1268 n_q4=1063 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.508
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6SNfY2IqBW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=614, bad_region=0, passed=8427
Got 8427 stars (including 7801 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8427 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=9.991 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.971 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.387 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.412 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.272 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.293 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.830 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.272 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.276 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.293
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.276 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1075 n_q2=1215 n_q3=1255 n_q4=1335 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.o8XX68xDtM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=612, bad_region=0, passed=8451
Got 8451 stars (including 7830 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8451 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=10.024 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.028 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.420 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.268 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.288 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4877 robust_rms_before=0.869 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.267 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.268 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.287 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.288
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.287 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=1070 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1250 n_q4=1336 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits sigma_overall=0.284 worst_q_ratio=1.276
ref2=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.508
new1=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.043
new2=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.073
reference average sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.392
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467_astrometric_residuals.png (4877 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:34:33.44 -05:22:11.8: 13.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:34:38.85 -05:24:20.3: 11.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:27:43.00 -08:18:05.3: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:10:14.98 -08:03:02.4: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:07:28.47 -08:40:52.3: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:25:21.34 -09:26:38.4: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:34:38.85 -05:24:20.3: 11.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:34:33.44 -05:22:11.8: 13.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:38.85 -05:24:20.3: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=10.8649 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:34:33.44 -05:22:11.8: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=10.5196 delta=2.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:27:43.00 -08:18:05.3: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:10:14.98 -08:03:02.4: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:25:21.34 -09:26:38.4: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:07:28.47 -08:40:52.3: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:43.00 -08:18:05.3: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1317 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:14.98 -08:03:02.4: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9511 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:21.34 -09:26:38.4: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0362 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:28.47 -08:40:52.3: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8580 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20595.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20519_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20519_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:26.31 -05:25:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20595_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
Preparing report for the candidate 20595_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20623_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20623_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:43.62 -05:18:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20629_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20629_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20648_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20648_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20655_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20655_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:43.76 -08:15:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20663_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20663_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:19.71 -05:27:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20666_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20666_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:32.36 -05:31:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20669_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20669_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:28.94 -05:23:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20673_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20673_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:43.00 -05:13:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20771_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20771_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20772_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20772_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20792_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20792_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20802_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20802_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20827_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20827_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20844_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20844_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06426_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 06426_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:20.71 -10:37:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20016_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20016_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:43.55 -14:23:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10563_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 10563_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:36.43 -14:48:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:34:33.44 -05:22:11.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:45.579 -09:58:53.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39
Second-epoch image center 05:08:45.579 -09:58:53.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0541 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:46.417 -09:58:22.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39
Second-epoch image center 05:08:46.417 -09:58:22.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0613 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:45.579 -09:58:53.99
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:46.417 -09:58:22.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00938 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8uS8uUBqti
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zW5uoU4vVm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AgQDLjV9Is
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QbWZrKgl7q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 65142 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1235 to 85.3642 deg, Dec -15.3210 to -4.5615 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1235 to 85.3642 deg, Dec -15.3210 to -4.5615 deg
Loaded 8277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6072 out of 7032 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7032 out of 65142 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.728850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.728850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 65142 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1235 to 85.3642 deg, Dec -15.3210 to -4.5615 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1235 to 85.3642 deg, Dec -15.3210 to -4.5615 deg
Loaded 8277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6072 out of 7032 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7032 out of 65142 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 68251 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1182 to 85.3598 deg, Dec -15.3134 to -4.5306 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1182 to 85.3598 deg, Dec -15.3134 to -4.5306 deg
Loaded 8288 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6083 out of 7030 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7030 out of 68251 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 57 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
1.8 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
2.3 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
2.3 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
15.4 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8uS8uUBqti (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=4033, bad_region=3, passed=65128
Got 65128 stars (including 61014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1291 n_q2=1207 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1114 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zW5uoU4vVm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=3880, bad_region=3, passed=68218
Got 68218 stars (including 64240 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68218 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1296 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1268 n_q4=1102 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.465
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.AgQDLjV9Is (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2216, bad_region=17, passed=50776
Got 50776 stars (including 48482 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=10.017 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.876 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.387 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.412 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.266 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.286 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=0.809 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.262 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.266 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.275 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.286
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.275 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1112 n_q2=1211 n_q3=1234 n_q4=1322 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.050
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QbWZrKgl7q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2219, bad_region=20, passed=50877
Got 50877 stars (including 48573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50877 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=10.071 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.268 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.428 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.264 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.288 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4877 robust_rms_before=0.842 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.259 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.264 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.276 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.288
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.276 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=1110 n_q2=1220 n_q3=1223 n_q4=1324 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-58-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_045944_TTUQ1b1x1_1065950_BzsI3orx/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:43:18.30 -09:32:57.3: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:06:28.82 -14:15:50.9: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:00:17.86 -13:50:17.4: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:01:30.91 -05:31:02.4: 11.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:50:40.41 -10:11:50.8: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:03:25.23 -13:06:58.8: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:43:18.30 -09:32:57.3: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:06:28.82 -14:15:50.9: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:01:30.91 -05:31:02.4: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:00:17.86 -13:50:17.4: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:50:40.41 -10:11:50.8: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:30.91 -05:31:02.4: ref_mag=11.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3730 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:40.41 -10:11:50.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2578 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:28.82 -14:15:50.9: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1584 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:17.86 -13:50:17.4: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6421 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:18.30 -09:32:57.3: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4252 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:04:52.26 -11:43:34.8: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:29:00.09 -11:24:13.0: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:23:40.19 -08:16:42.7: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:03:25.23 -13:06:58.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:04:52.26 -11:43:34.8: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:29:00.09 -11:24:13.0: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:52.26 -11:43:34.8: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8954 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:23:40.19 -08:16:42.7: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:00.09 -11:24:13.0: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8829 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:40.19 -08:16:42.7: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0963 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:49:14.10 -09:00:36.7: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:24:24.19 -10:22:09.2: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:14:54.50 -07:40:37.9: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:07:29.61 -08:40:26.6: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:49:14.10 -09:00:36.7: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:24:24.19 -10:22:09.2: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:24.19 -10:22:09.2: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3004 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:14.10 -09:00:36.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5261 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:14:54.50 -07:40:37.9: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:54.50 -07:40:37.9: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5954 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:02:11.84 -11:06:15.6: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:29:50.83 -09:57:21.8: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:07:29.61 -08:40:26.6: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:29.61 -08:40:26.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5608 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:40:24.67 -11:46:01.5: 13.70 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:02:11.84 -11:06:15.6: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:11.84 -11:06:15.6: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6219 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:11:07.75 -09:23:24.2: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:29:50.83 -09:57:21.8: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:50.83 -09:57:21.8: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7415 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:33:04.29 -05:19:41.2: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:40:24.67 -11:46:01.5: 13.97 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:11:07.75 -09:23:24.2: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:44:48.58 -09:39:06.1: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:10:43.30 -10:06:57.0: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:33:04.29 -05:19:41.2: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:37:10.71 -06:35:27.3: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:59:34.49 -06:21:01.7: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:04.29 -05:19:41.2: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9315 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:07.75 -09:23:24.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9016 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:24.67 -11:46:01.5: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8327 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:55:42.78 -06:39:32.2: 14.42 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:45:36.27 -10:10:00.5: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:10:43.30 -10:06:57.0: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:37:10.71 -06:35:27.3: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:59:34.49 -06:21:01.7: 14.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:44:48.58 -09:39:06.1: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:43.30 -10:06:57.0: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9043 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:10.71 -06:35:27.3: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9717 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:59:34.49 -06:21:01.7: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3665 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:48.58 -09:39:06.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9998 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:55:42.78 -06:39:32.2: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:42.78 -06:39:32.2: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3686 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:45:36.27 -10:10:00.5: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:04:14.97 -09:03:20.7: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:36.27 -10:10:00.5: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5025 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:39:09.88 -10:39:16.4: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:42:27.48 -11:55:25.4: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:04:14.97 -09:03:20.7: 14.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:39:09.88 -10:39:16.4: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:14.97 -09:03:20.7: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7232 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:09.88 -10:39:16.4: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6576 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:42:27.48 -11:55:25.4: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:27.48 -11:55:25.4: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4940 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82611.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82062_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82062_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82072_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82072_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:04.13 -07:03:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82073_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82073_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:07.59 -09:05:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82074_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82074_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82085_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82085_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:32.66 -08:49:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82086_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82086_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82088_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82088_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:37.49 -06:51:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82089_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82089_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82091_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82091_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:48.14 -08:56:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82092_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82092_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82364_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82364_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:27.02 -05:13:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82378_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82378_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:11.94 -05:24:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82541_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82541_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82587_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82587_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:46.08 -08:24:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82611_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
Preparing report for the candidate 82611_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82640_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82640_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82674_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82674_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82752_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82752_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:45.90 -05:58:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82762_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82762_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82766_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82766_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:22.78 -10:39:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82834_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82834_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82869_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82869_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:53.92 -06:06:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82915_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82915_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82947_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82947_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:02.96 -05:30:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82963_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82963_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82977_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82977_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:31.13 -08:45:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82988_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82988_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:57.72 -07:03:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82989_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82989_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:46.06 -08:38:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82995_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 82995_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83005_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83005_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83019_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83019_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:50.91 -06:42:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83029_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83029_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:58.96 -14:27:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83079_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83079_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83081_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83081_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:44.39 -10:16:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83121_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83121_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83147_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83147_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:37.83 -05:41:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83173_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83173_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83190_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83190_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83250_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83250_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:44.01 -07:51:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83251_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83251_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:39.30 -12:13:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83264_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83264_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:04.85 -11:35:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83265_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83265_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:47.49 -08:09:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83287_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83287_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:38.68 -08:21:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83292_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83292_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83307_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83307_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83339_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83339_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83355_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83355_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:00.79 -11:37:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83478_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83478_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83596_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83596_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83610_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83610_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83620_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83620_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83677_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83677_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83707_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83707_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83756_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 83756_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:32.97 -06:18:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53894_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 53894_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:56.51 -13:04:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39103_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 39103_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:20.70 -10:37:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43440_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 43440_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks