This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3923 2461302.8923 12.05 02:29:54.68 -01:40:42.3
169.93208 -55.29548 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.505 Cava 0 0 0 12.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:29:54.68 -01:40:42.3: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:29:54.68 -01:40:42.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3923* 02 29 54.68 -01 40 42.3 12.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8923,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3923 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3923 2461302.8923 12.47 02:17:56.54 -03:26:21.2
167.78832 -58.56199 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.360 Carlova -0 -0 0 12.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:17:56.54 -03:26:21.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:17:56.54 -03:26:21.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3923* 02 17 56.54 -03 26 21.2 12.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8923,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3923 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3923 2461302.8923 12.44 03:04:58.03 +01:24:40.1
176.73353 -47.02920 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.129 Antigone -0 0 0 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 03:04:58.03 +01:24:40.1: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 03:04:58.03 +01:24:40.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3923* 03 04 58.03 +01 24 40.1 12.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8923,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3923 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3923 2461302.8923 12.59 02:29:16.94 +00:44:23.3
167.08186 -53.52825 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.622 Esther -0 -0 0 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:29:16.94 +00:44:23.3: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:29:16.94 +00:44:23.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3923* 02 29 16.94 +00 44 23.3 12.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8923,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3923 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3923 2461302.8923 14.38 02:21:25.11 -06:46:06.2
173.40813 -60.49125 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.891 Gunhild 0 0 0 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:21:25.11 -06:46:06.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:21:25.11 -06:46:06.2: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3923* 02 21 25.11 -06 46 06.2 14.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8923,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3923 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.64292808 09.01.2026 03:25:38.986 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
First image: 2461049.64292808 09.01.2026 03:25:38.986 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Last image: 2461302.89259745 19.09.2026 09:25:10.420 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6695
Objects passed selection criteria: 6692
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6367
Average stars matched: 6178 (97.0316 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232776 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 04:27:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.64292808 09.01.2026 03:25:38.986 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
First image: 2461049.64292808 09.01.2026 03:25:38.986 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Last image: 2461302.89259745 19.09.2026 09:25:10.420 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 37
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 34443
Objects passed selection criteria: 34370
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 32657.5
Average stars matched: 31574.5 (96.6838 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 257424 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 04:28:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.89196559
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:17.849 -02:00:16.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:31.446 -01:59:10.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:17.849 -02:00:16.62
Second-epoch image center 02:34:31.446 -01:59:10.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0596 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:28.716 -01:59:27.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:17.849 -02:00:16.62
Second-epoch image center 02:34:28.716 -01:59:27.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0472 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:34:31.446 -01:59:10.13
Second-epoch second image center 02:34:28.716 -01:59:27.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01239 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bbK4i8Kyyx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TBxC4EXPCH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bFMyFPTP1T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jAVtvvqYm8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits and wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits and wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits and wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.6680 to 46.5230 deg, Dec -7.3087 to +3.3180 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.6680 to 46.5230 deg, Dec -7.3087 to 3.3180 deg
Loaded 4175 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3371 out of 3568 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3568 out of 6487 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.896100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.896100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.6680 to 46.5230 deg, Dec -7.3087 to +3.3180 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.6680 to 46.5230 deg, Dec -7.3087 to 3.3180 deg
Loaded 4175 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3371 out of 3568 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3568 out of 6487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 6467 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.6622 to 46.5229 deg, Dec -7.3144 to +3.3098 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.6622 to 46.5229 deg, Dec -7.3144 to 3.3098 deg
Loaded 4174 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3349 out of 3556 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3556 out of 6467 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
2.0 pix Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.bbK4i8Kyyx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=509, bad_region=0, passed=6487
Got 6487 stars (including 5966 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1325 n_q2=1207 n_q3=1198 n_q4=1146 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.438
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -region wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TBxC4EXPCH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=518, bad_region=0, passed=6467
Got 6467 stars (including 5936 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6467 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1208 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.409
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits -region wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bFMyFPTP1T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=414, bad_region=0, passed=6376
Got 6376 stars (including 5951 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6376 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6376 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6376 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6376 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=11.043 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.393 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.391 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.267 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.276 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=1.008 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.273 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.267 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.290 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.276
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.290 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1192 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1280 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jAVtvvqYm8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=414, bad_region=0, passed=6364
Got 6364 stars (including 5941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6364 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=11.087 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.349 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.416 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.288 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=1.012 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.282 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.298 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.288
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.298 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=1194 n_q2=1163 n_q3=1240 n_q4=1278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.438
ref2=Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.409
new1=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.082
new2=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.071
reference average sigma_overall=0.3095 worst_q_ratio=1.4235
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097_astrometric_residuals.png (4876 matched stars from wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098_astrometric_residuals.png (4876 matched stars from wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434_astrometric_residuals.png (4876 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:37:19.32 -00:35:55.1: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:35:43.66 -02:54:02.2: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 03:03:26.78 -04:57:25.4: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:40:40.61 -01:51:48.1: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:29:54.68 -01:40:42.3: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:34:30.25 -02:48:08.6: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:33:55.57 -03:24:01.6: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:29:54.68 -01:40:42.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:33:55.57 -03:24:01.6: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:37:19.32 -00:35:55.1: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:35:43.66 -02:54:02.2: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:34:30.25 -02:48:08.6: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 03:03:26.78 -04:57:25.4: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:40:40.61 -01:51:48.1: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:37:19.32 -00:35:55.1: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2339 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:33:55.57 -03:24:01.6: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2029 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:35:43.66 -02:54:02.2: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2397 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:34:30.25 -02:48:08.6: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9980 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:26.78 -04:57:25.4: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2616 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:40:40.61 -01:51:48.1: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2310 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20460.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20312_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20312_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20322_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20322_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:28.47 -02:57:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20456_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20456_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20460_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 20460_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20477_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20477_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20481_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20481_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20482_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20482_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20486_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20486_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
02:29:54.68 -01:40:42.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:17.849 -02:00:16.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:31.446 -01:59:10.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:17.849 -02:00:16.62
Second-epoch image center 02:34:31.446 -01:59:10.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0596 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:28.716 -01:59:27.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:17.849 -02:00:16.62
Second-epoch image center 02:34:28.716 -01:59:27.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0472 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:34:31.446 -01:59:10.13
Second-epoch second image center 02:34:28.716 -01:59:27.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01239 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lBXeD6glan
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xdrgTLDVqM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5ugXBzzXxO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dybijZRuP9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits and wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits and wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits and wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34731 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.6680 to 46.5317 deg, Dec -7.3105 to +3.3218 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.6680 to 46.5317 deg, Dec -7.3105 to 3.3218 deg
Loaded 4180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3259 out of 3624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3624 out of 34731 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.794800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.794800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34731 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.6680 to 46.5317 deg, Dec -7.3105 to +3.3218 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.6680 to 46.5317 deg, Dec -7.3105 to 3.3218 deg
Loaded 4180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3259 out of 3624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3624 out of 34731 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 34698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.6560 to 46.5229 deg, Dec -7.3181 to +3.3098 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.6560 to 46.5229 deg, Dec -7.3181 to 3.3098 deg
Loaded 4177 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3247 out of 3624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3624 out of 34698 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 36 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
1.9 pix Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
15.5 mag. Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lBXeD6glan (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1492, bad_region=2, passed=34715
Got 34715 stars (including 33157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34715 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1307 n_q2=1219 n_q3=1195 n_q4=1162 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.374
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -region wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xdrgTLDVqM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1502, bad_region=1, passed=34688
Got 34688 stars (including 33135 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34688 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1309 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1192 n_q4=1157 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.366
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits -region wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5ugXBzzXxO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1255, bad_region=31, passed=31047
Got 31047 stars (including 29719 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=10.934 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.096 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.387 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.262 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.274 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4877 robust_rms_before=0.997 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.266 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.262 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.283 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.274
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.283 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=1192 n_q2=1163 n_q3=1265 n_q4=1257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dybijZRuP9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1212, bad_region=32, passed=31183
Got 31183 stars (including 29894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31183 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=10.908 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.151 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.414 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.279 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=1.003 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.281 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.289 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.279
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.289 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1207 n_q2=1160 n_q3=1251 n_q4=1258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-24-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_042559_TTUQ1b1x1_3758196_Jjywownq/wcs_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:49:26.66 +00:30:12.6: 14.55 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:18:09.67 -03:08:57.6: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:10:08.37 -02:37:05.9: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:08:01.40 -01:53:53.7: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:44:03.07 -04:48:55.3: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:32:02.34 -01:47:47.1: 14.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 03:04:58.03 +01:24:40.1: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:17:56.54 -03:26:21.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:29:16.94 +00:44:23.3: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:18:09.67 -03:08:57.6: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:49:26.66 +00:30:12.6: 14.89 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:32:02.34 -01:47:47.1: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:08:01.40 -01:53:53.7: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:44:03.07 -04:48:55.3: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:10:08.37 -02:37:05.9: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:18:09.67 -03:08:57.6: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3785 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:49:26.66 +00:30:12.6: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6068 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:32:02.34 -01:47:47.1: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6435 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:01.40 -01:53:53.7: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3336 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:44:03.07 -04:48:55.3: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7246 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:08.37 -02:37:05.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6463 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:17:56.54 -03:26:21.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:29:16.94 +00:44:23.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 03:04:58.03 +01:24:40.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:15:40.60 -05:26:57.2: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:21:25.11 -06:46:06.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:15:40.60 -05:26:57.2: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:17:06.47 -00:30:06.8: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:15:40.60 -05:26:57.2: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0986 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:18:46.99 -01:31:56.7: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:26:58.88 +02:25:06.4: 14.42 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:18:53.81 +01:05:32.2: 15.10 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:05:54.13 -02:35:53.4: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:21:25.11 -06:46:06.2: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:17:06.47 -00:30:06.8: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:17:06.47 -00:30:06.8: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1364 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:26:58.88 +02:25:06.4: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:05:54.13 -02:35:53.4: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:18:53.81 +01:05:32.2: 15.58 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:18:46.99 -01:31:56.7: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:26:58.88 +02:25:06.4: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5191 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:18:53.81 +01:05:32.2: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7439 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:05:54.13 -02:35:53.4: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5965 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:18:46.99 -01:31:56.7: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5061 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:08:22.63 -01:41:28.6: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:08:22.63 -01:41:28.6: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:22.63 -01:41:28.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8381 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:19:00.79 +01:15:05.0: 15.46 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:07:33.72 +01:59:09.9: 15.32 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:06:19.18 -02:40:38.2: 15.14 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:32:32.53 -00:54:26.2: 14.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:19:56.24 -02:29:20.1: 14.89 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:19:00.79 +01:15:05.0: 15.42 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:00.79 +01:15:05.0: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8427 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:19:56.24 -02:29:20.1: 15.36 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:32:32.53 -00:54:26.2: 14.93 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:06:19.18 -02:40:38.2: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:07:33.72 +01:59:09.9: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:56.24 -02:29:20.1: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9388 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:32:32.53 -00:54:26.2: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7717 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:19.18 -02:40:38.2: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9099 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:07:33.72 +01:59:09.9: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9116 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:39:07.31 +02:02:21.4: 15.36 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:39:07.31 +02:02:21.4: 15.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:39:07.31 +02:02:21.4: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8119 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:14:33.30 -03:54:36.8: 14.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:13:17.20 +02:20:24.1: 15.38 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-25-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits at 02:10:18.98 -02:32:40.6: 15.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:14:33.30 -03:54:36.8: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:14:33.30 -03:54:36.8: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8661 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:13:17.20 +02:20:24.1: 15.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-26-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits at 02:10:18.98 -02:32:40.6: 15.66 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:13:17.20 +02:20:24.1: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8132 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:18.98 -02:32:40.6: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8885 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52537.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52568.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52574.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53116.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52329_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52329_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52330_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52330_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52332_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52332_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52334_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52334_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52339_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52339_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52340_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52340_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52342_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52342_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:06:38.62 -04:15:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52343_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52343_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:48:38.48 -02:03:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52353_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:28.46 -02:57:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52493_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52493_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:29:54.67 -01:40:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52537_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 52537_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52568_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 52568_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52574_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 52574_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52873_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52873_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:33.43 -00:35:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52942_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52942_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:04:36.29 +02:10:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52959_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52959_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52963_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:48.90 -03:02:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53038_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53038_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53071_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53071_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:08.30 -03:03:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53083_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53083_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:46:48.00 -04:33:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53102_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53102_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:49:10.50 -02:35:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53116_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 53116_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53212_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53212_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53224_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53224_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53257_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53257_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53278_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53278_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53283_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53283_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53324_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53324_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53327_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53327_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53344_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53344_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53348_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53348_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53354_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53354_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53365_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53365_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53369_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53369_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53370_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53370_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53376_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 53376_fd_Cet-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
