This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3851 2461302.8851 12.46 03:04:58.16 +01:24:42.6
176.73335 -47.02833 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.129 Antigone 0 0 0 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:04:58.16 +01:24:42.6: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:04:58.16 +01:24:42.6: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3851* 03 04 58.16 +01 24 42.6 12.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8851,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3851 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3851 2461302.8851 12.55 03:04:35.84 +03:00:35.6
174.98853 -45.96999 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.221 Eos 0 -0 0 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:04:35.84 +03:00:35.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:04:35.84 +03:00:35.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3851* 03 04 35.84 +03 00 35.6 12.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8851,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3851 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3851 2461302.8851 13.29 03:16:26.52 +02:48:02.1
178.11384 -43.99377 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.464 Megaira -0 -1 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:16:26.52 +02:48:02.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:16:26.52 +02:48:02.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3851* 03 16 26.52 +02 48 02.1 13.3 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8851,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3851 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3851 2461302.8851 13.79 03:18:27.90 +10:16:13.4
171.58518 -38.33947 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.619 Triberga -0 0 0 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:18:27.90 +10:16:13.4: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:18:27.90 +10:16:13.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3851* 03 18 27.90 +10 16 13.4 13.8 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8851,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3851 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3851* 03 31 40.23 +07 18 17.8 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8851,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3851 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
First image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Last image: 2461302.88544972 19.09.2026 09:14:52.856 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6843
Objects passed selection criteria: 6840
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6521.25
Average stars matched: 6381 (97.8493 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 04:16:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
First image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Last image: 2461302.88544972 19.09.2026 09:14:52.856 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 49
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 38578
Objects passed selection criteria: 38496
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 36777
Average stars matched: 35783.2 (97.2979 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 262248 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 04:17:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.88472931
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:26:03.428 +06:00:07.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:26:03.428 +06:00:07.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0753 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:26:06.651 +06:00:38.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:26:06.651 +06:00:38.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0905 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:26:03.428 +06:00:07.62
Second-epoch second image center 03:26:06.651 +06:00:38.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01580 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cud4Piy9vX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QecrSz9VXF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZnBVfyCbG5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xFplPCsliK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2623 deg
Loaded 4344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3518 out of 3704 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3704 out of 6894 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2623 deg
Loaded 4344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3518 out of 3704 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3704 out of 6894 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6511 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4391 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6696 to +11.2487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4391 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6696 to 11.2487 deg
Loaded 4348 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3541 out of 3691 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3691 out of 6511 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
2.1 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
15.3 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Cud4Piy9vX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=524, bad_region=0, passed=6894
Got 6894 stars (including 6363 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1258 n_q2=1017 n_q3=1321 n_q4=1279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.316
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QecrSz9VXF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=474, bad_region=1, passed=6511
Got 6511 stars (including 6031 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6511 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1260 n_q2=1041 n_q3=1292 n_q4=1287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZnBVfyCbG5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=416, bad_region=1, passed=6439
Got 6439 stars (including 6015 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6439 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.4 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6439 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.4 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6439 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6439 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=11.917 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.537 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.387 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.256 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.269 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=1.003 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.257 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.256 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.265 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.269
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.265 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1293 n_q3=1019 n_q4=1252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.035
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xFplPCsliK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=434, bad_region=0, passed=6399
Got 6399 stars (including 5960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6399 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.4 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.4 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=11.929 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.577 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.398 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.265 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.277 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=1.008 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.276 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.265 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.286 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.277
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.286 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1324 n_q2=1294 n_q3=1017 n_q4=1251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.316
ref2=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.290 worst_q_ratio=1.274
new1=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits sigma_overall=0.268 worst_q_ratio=1.035
new2=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.078
reference average sigma_overall=0.2865 worst_q_ratio=1.295
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:28:59.89 +05:26:58.8: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:28:59.89 +05:26:58.8: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:59.89 +05:26:58.8: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3716 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20294_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 20294_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:41.23 +09:22:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20336_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 20336_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:26:03.428 +06:00:07.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:26:03.428 +06:00:07.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0753 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:26:06.651 +06:00:38.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:26:06.651 +06:00:38.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0905 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:26:03.428 +06:00:07.62
Second-epoch second image center 03:26:06.651 +06:00:38.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01580 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xNhn6j5tlL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NKwBamTLIv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mG5GOGNJOU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bxh8WszDDU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2698 deg
Loaded 4347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3388 out of 3752 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3752 out of 40138 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.819500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.819500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 40138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2698 deg
Loaded 4347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3388 out of 3752 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3752 out of 40138 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 36794 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4364 to 59.4140 deg, Dec +0.6695 to +11.2585 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4364 to 59.4140 deg, Dec 0.6695 to 11.2585 deg
Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3421 out of 3757 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3757 out of 36794 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 44 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
2.0 pix Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xNhn6j5tlL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1702, bad_region=4, passed=40128
Got 40128 stars (including 38357 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1018 n_q3=1335 n_q4=1283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NKwBamTLIv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1580, bad_region=2, passed=36779
Got 36779 stars (including 35146 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1241 n_q2=1030 n_q3=1302 n_q4=1308 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mG5GOGNJOU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1312, bad_region=32, passed=35482
Got 35482 stars (including 34084 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35482 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=11.536 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.403 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.382 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.251 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.266 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4884 robust_rms_before=0.988 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.254 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.251 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.265 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.266
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.265 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=1326 n_q2=1307 n_q3=1019 n_q4=1232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.037
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Bxh8WszDDU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1332, bad_region=36, passed=35704
Got 35704 stars (including 34282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35704 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=11.416 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.396 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.393 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.259 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.271 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4883 robust_rms_before=0.992 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.259 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.281 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.271
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.281 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1345 n_q2=1298 n_q3=1015 n_q4=1225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_041529_TTUQ1b1x1_3322446_6cEaGWEa/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:07:52.32 +03:04:38.4: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:30:36.28 +04:54:13.4: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:31:52.48 +04:17:47.4: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:04:58.16 +01:24:42.6: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:50:08.21 +09:59:51.7: 14.42 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:04:35.84 +03:00:35.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:14:21.29 +10:20:54.1: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:01:53.28 +02:15:18.9: 14.66 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:06:38.85 +05:58:51.5: 14.99 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:01:53.28 +02:15:18.9: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:30:36.28 +04:54:13.4: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:31:52.48 +04:17:47.4: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:50:08.21 +09:59:51.7: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:04:35.84 +03:00:35.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:04:58.16 +01:24:42.6: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:14:21.29 +10:20:54.1: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:07:52.32 +03:04:38.4: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:06:38.85 +05:58:51.5: 14.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:01:53.28 +02:15:18.9: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7922 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:36.28 +04:54:13.4: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0413 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:52.48 +04:17:47.4: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5452 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:21.29 +10:20:54.1: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1906 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:08.21 +09:59:51.7: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4983 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:38.85 +05:58:51.5: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9305 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:52.32 +03:04:38.4: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7959 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:16:26.52 +02:48:02.1: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:16:26.52 +02:48:02.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:53:11.63 +06:32:58.4: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:00:26.29 +04:43:57.5: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:32:36.86 +03:56:37.3: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:18:27.90 +10:16:13.4: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:42:29.30 +03:56:44.8: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:48:18.02 +08:47:53.9: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:42:29.30 +03:56:44.8: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:18:27.90 +10:16:13.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:53:11.63 +06:32:58.4: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:00:26.29 +04:43:57.5: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:32:36.86 +03:56:37.3: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:48:18.02 +08:47:53.9: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:29.30 +03:56:44.8: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4567 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:11.63 +06:32:58.4: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4389 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:36.86 +03:56:37.3: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1531 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:00:26.29 +04:43:57.5: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1104 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:18.02 +08:47:53.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8534 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:59:25.20 +06:24:25.0: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:57:38.23 +05:09:54.1: 14.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:54:51.31 +09:21:42.2: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:35:49.27 +01:12:58.0: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:59:01.28 +03:04:43.7: 14.88 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:59:25.20 +06:24:25.0: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:54:51.31 +09:21:42.2: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:57:38.23 +05:09:54.1: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:35:49.27 +01:12:58.0: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:59:25.20 +06:24:25.0: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7976 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:51.31 +09:21:42.2: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2161 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:38.23 +05:09:54.1: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7408 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:49.27 +01:12:58.0: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3491 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:59:01.28 +03:04:43.7: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:59:01.28 +03:04:43.7: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9268 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:56:38.41 +09:39:15.0: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:55:39.63 +04:30:45.8: 15.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:58:11.64 +04:44:47.1: 15.19 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:05:59.83 +04:11:42.2: 15.29 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:54:41.87 +03:46:10.7: 15.43 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:56:38.41 +09:39:15.0: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:56:38.41 +09:39:15.0: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8378 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:13:19.09 +04:44:37.9: 15.02 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:55:39.63 +04:30:45.8: 15.21 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:58:11.64 +04:44:47.1: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:05:59.83 +04:11:42.2: 15.55 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:55:39.63 +04:30:45.8: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9676 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:54:41.87 +03:46:10.7: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:59.83 +04:11:42.2: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9490 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:58:11.64 +04:44:47.1: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9431 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:54:41.87 +03:46:10.7: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9890 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:13:19.09 +04:44:37.9: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:19.09 +04:44:37.9: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8931 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:01:52.75 +07:59:46.9: 15.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:01:10.64 +06:10:43.3: 15.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:57:52.93 +04:04:10.5: 15.45 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:02:07.43 +07:41:24.3: 15.28 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:09:22.50 +10:03:19.2: 15.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:01:52.75 +07:59:46.9: 15.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:01:52.75 +07:59:46.9: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9730 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:01:10.64 +06:10:43.3: 15.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:01:10.64 +06:10:43.3: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9783 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:57:52.93 +04:04:10.5: 15.23 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:09:22.50 +10:03:19.2: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:02:07.43 +07:41:24.3: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:52.93 +04:04:10.5: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.9749 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:22.50 +10:03:19.2: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9350 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:03:33.84 +03:29:48.3: 15.37 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:07.43 +07:41:24.3: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0500 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:03:33.84 +03:29:48.3: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:33.84 +03:29:48.3: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8649 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:00:37.72 +10:20:14.1: 15.50 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:08:16.74 +04:47:43.1: 15.36 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:10:58.05 +06:16:08.5: 15.36 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:30:39.19 +03:29:05.7: 15.12 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:53:15.76 +10:24:44.8: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:00:37.72 +10:20:14.1: 15.14 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:00:37.72 +10:20:14.1: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9279 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:08:16.74 +04:47:43.1: 15.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:53:15.76 +10:24:44.8: 15.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:16.74 +04:47:43.1: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0051 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:10:58.05 +06:16:08.5: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:30:39.19 +03:29:05.7: 15.58 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:15.76 +10:24:44.8: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9248 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:58.05 +06:16:08.5: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0738 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:39.19 +03:29:05.7: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9483 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:37:49.60 +08:12:21.0: 15.25 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:37:49.60 +08:12:21.0: 15.62 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:49.60 +08:12:21.0: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0701 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:37:12.07 +03:59:44.6: 15.16 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:37:12.07 +03:59:44.6: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:12.07 +03:59:44.6: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9932 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51590.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51593.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51762.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51911.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51408_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 51408_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51409_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 51409_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51416_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 51416_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51424_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 51424_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51425_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 51425_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51426_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 51426_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51427_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 51427_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51590_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 51590_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51593_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 51593_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51674_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 51674_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:19.98 +05:01:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51739_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 51739_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:47.30 +09:11:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51762_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 51762_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51818_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 51818_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51827_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 51827_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51911_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 51911_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51961_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 51961_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51984_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 51984_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52064_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
Preparing report for the candidate 52064_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52069_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52069_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52129_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52129_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:32.87 +08:47:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52184_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52184_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52196_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52196_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52276_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52276_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52280_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52280_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52346_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52346_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52360_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52360_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52362_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52362_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52374_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52374_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52382_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52382_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52395_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52395_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52411_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52411_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52426_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52426_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52451_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52451_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52469_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52469_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52471_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52471_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52474_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52474_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52475_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52475_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52488_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52488_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52491_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52491_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52493_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52493_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52509_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52509_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52513_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52513_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52546_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52546_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425
The candidate 52602_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-14-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425 did not pass the final checks
