This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3782* 00 48 40.69 +02 17 36.9 7.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8782,7.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3782 7.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3782* 00 48 53.25 +02 17 33.1 8.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8782,8.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3782 8.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3782 2461302.8782 8.77 00:27:56.03 +08:22:09.9
112.99764 -54.04835 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.192 Nausikaa 0 1 1 8.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:27:56.03 +08:22:09.9: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:27:56.03 +08:22:09.9: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8782,8.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3782 8.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3782* 00 48 22.60 +02 18 14.5 10.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8782,10.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3782 10.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3782* 00 48 40.69 +02 17 36.8 7.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8782,7.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3782 7.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3782* 00 48 53.25 +02 17 32.9 8.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8782,8.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3782 8.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3782* 00 48 22.59 +02 18 14.1 10.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8782,10.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3782 10.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3782 2461302.8782 12.96 01:05:00.00 +10:47:50.9
128.33818 -51.93186 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.510 Mabella -0 -0 0 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:05:00.00 +10:47:50.9: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:05:00.00 +10:47:50.9: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8782,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3782 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3782 2461302.8782 13.13 01:14:59.08 +03:48:46.0
134.24003 -58.54103 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.58 Concordia 0 0 0 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:14:59.08 +03:48:46.0: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:14:59.08 +03:48:46.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8782,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3782 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3782 2461302.8782 13.45 00:26:39.41 +08:05:19.4
112.38830 -54.27493 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.577 Rhea -0 -0 0 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:26:39.41 +08:05:19.4: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:26:39.41 +08:05:19.4: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8782,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3782 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3782 2461302.8782 13.95 01:01:41.96 +01:05:43.8
128.34276 -61.66840 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1132 Hollandia 0 -0 0 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:01:41.96 +01:05:43.8: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:01:41.96 +01:05:43.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3782* 01 01 41.96 +01 05 43.8 13.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8782,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3782 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3782 2461302.8782 14.05 01:20:58.82 +02:03:54.5
137.79722 -59.95121 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.522 Helga 0 -0 0 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:20:58.82 +02:03:54.5: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:20:58.82 +02:03:54.5: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3782* 01 20 58.82 +02 03 54.5 14.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8782,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3782 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3782 2461302.8782 14.57 01:11:39.47 +08:22:13.7
131.49496 -54.16475 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2251 Tikhov -0 1 1 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:11:39.47 +08:22:13.7: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:11:39.47 +08:22:13.7: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8782,14.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3782 14.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
First image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Last image: 2461302.87854083 19.09.2026 09:04:55.928 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6141
Objects passed selection criteria: 6140
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5818.5
Average stars matched: 5581.75 (95.9311 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232328 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 04:06:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
First image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Last image: 2461302.87854083 19.09.2026 09:04:55.928 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 219
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33586
Objects passed selection criteria: 33476
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31757.5
Average stars matched: 29458 (92.7592 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 254876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 04:07:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.87794816
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:09.609 +05:59:37.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:09.609 +05:59:37.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0698 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:09.668 +06:00:08.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:09.668 +06:00:08.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0694 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:09.609 +05:59:37.59
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:09.668 +06:00:08.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00869 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Syx40H9nub
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9Je7qphNQK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P8Tmwc8yXr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1x744AJuEn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec +0.6752 to +11.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec 0.6752 to 11.2667 deg
Loaded 4455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3613 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 5718 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.625400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.625400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec +0.6752 to +11.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec 0.6752 to 11.2667 deg
Loaded 4455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3613 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 5718 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8902 to 20.7787 deg, Dec +0.7135 to +11.2815 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8902 to 20.7787 deg, Dec 0.7135 to 11.2815 deg
Loaded 4441 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3584 out of 3667 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3667 out of 5640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
2.3 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
15.1 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Syx40H9nub (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5718
Got 5718 stars (including 5395 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=1254 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9Je7qphNQK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5640
Got 5640 stars (including 5317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1252 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.P8Tmwc8yXr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=412, bad_region=0, passed=6031
Got 6031 stars (including 5612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=10.999 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.619 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.616 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.429 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4913 robust_rms_before=1.041 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.420 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.429
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.420 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=1179 n_q2=1170 n_q3=1306 n_q4=1258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1x744AJuEn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=413, bad_region=0, passed=6018
Got 6018 stars (including 5599 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6018 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=11.033 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.615 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.522 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.627 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.425 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4909 robust_rms_before=1.033 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.420 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.425
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.420 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1173 n_q2=1181 n_q3=1298 n_q4=1257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.093
new1=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.116
new2=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.146
reference average sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.1055
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414_astrometric_residuals.png (4913 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_040529_TTUQ1b1x1_2634717_89fkoK5U/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:07:08.31 +05:12:40.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:48:30.85 +05:48:31.8: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:53:38.70 +06:06:31.7: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:27:56.03 +08:22:09.9: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:48:30.85 +05:48:31.8: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:27:56.03 +08:22:09.9: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:53:38.70 +06:06:31.7: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:07:08.31 +05:12:40.0: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:30.85 +05:48:31.8: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0992 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:38.70 +06:06:31.7: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0407 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:08.31 +05:12:40.0: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0252 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20202.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20192_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 20192_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20199_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 20199_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20202_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 20202_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20238_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 20238_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20356_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20356_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20366_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20366_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32517_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32517_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32518_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32518_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32519_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32519_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32520_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32520_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32521_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32521_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32522_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32522_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32523_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32523_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32524_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32524_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:22.70 +05:29:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32525_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32525_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32526_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32526_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32527_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32527_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32528_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32528_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32530_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32530_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32533_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32533_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32536_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32536_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32538_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32538_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32539_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32539_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32540_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32540_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:49.35 +00:53:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32541_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32541_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32543_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32543_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:21:32.82 +09:14:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32544_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32544_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32545_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32545_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32546_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32546_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32547_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32547_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32548_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32548_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32549_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32549_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32550_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 32550_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32557_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 32557_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32560_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32560_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:27:56.03 +08:22:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32600_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 32600_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32742_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32742_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32751_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32751_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32780_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32780_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32805_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32805_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32829_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32829_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:11.56 +00:50:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32859_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 32859_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32911_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 32911_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32972_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 32972_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33015_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 33015_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33142_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33142_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33175_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33175_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33190_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33190_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33212_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 33212_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33235_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33235_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33248_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33248_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33249_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 33249_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33250_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33250_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33251_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33251_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33288_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33288_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33302_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33302_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33311_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33311_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33315_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33315_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33316_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33316_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33328_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33328_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33347_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33347_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33356_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33356_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33368_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33368_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33378_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33378_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33380_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33380_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33386_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33386_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33396_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33396_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33399_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33399_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:15.90 +01:23:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33401_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33401_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33402_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33402_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33408_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33408_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33409_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33409_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33410_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33410_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33416_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33416_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33421_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33421_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33422_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33422_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33426_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33426_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33429_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33429_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:47:36.06 +09:46:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33431_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33431_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33432_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33432_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:54.05 +01:26:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33434_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33434_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33439_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33439_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33441_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33441_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33445_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33445_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33448_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33448_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33450_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33450_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33459_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33459_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33467_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33467_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33471_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33471_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33473_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33473_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33474_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33474_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33481_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33481_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33486_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33486_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33492_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33492_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33493_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33493_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33496_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33496_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33497_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33497_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33498_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33498_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33510_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33510_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33513_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33513_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33514_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33514_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33515_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33515_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:18.10 +00:58:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33517_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33517_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33518_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33518_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33525_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33525_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33527_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33527_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33530_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33530_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33531_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33531_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33537_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33537_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33542_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33542_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33549_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33549_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33554_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33554_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33555_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33555_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33556_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33556_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33557_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33557_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33562_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33562_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33565_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33565_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33566_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33566_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33568_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33568_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33573_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33573_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33574_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33574_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33576_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33576_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33584_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33584_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:36.77 +00:51:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33587_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33587_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33588_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33588_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33591_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33591_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33593_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33593_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33597_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33597_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:19.79 +00:49:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33602_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33602_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33606_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33606_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33608_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33608_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33610_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33610_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33612_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33612_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33613_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33613_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33615_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33615_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33619_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33619_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33621_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33621_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33626_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33626_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33628_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33628_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33631_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33631_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33637_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33637_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33639_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33639_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33641_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33641_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33642_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33642_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33643_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33643_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33645_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33645_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33648_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33648_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33651_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33651_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33655_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33655_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33658_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33658_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33659_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33659_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33664_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33664_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33669_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33669_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33672_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33672_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33673_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33673_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33675_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33675_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33685_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33685_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33686_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33686_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33688_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33688_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33689_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33689_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33691_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33691_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33693_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33693_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33696_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33696_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33697_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33697_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33698_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33698_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33699_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33699_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33702_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33702_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33703_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33703_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:34.96 +00:56:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33705_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 33705_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33709_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33709_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33710_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33710_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:50.26 +01:05:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33715_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33715_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33716_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33716_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33721_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33721_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33728_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33728_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33738_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33738_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33742_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33742_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33745_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33745_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33746_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33746_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33751_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33751_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:31.13 +00:54:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33767_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33767_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33769_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33769_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33773_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33773_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33775_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33775_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33791_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33791_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33798_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33798_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33815_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33815_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33829_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33829_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33867_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33867_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33880_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33880_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33893_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33893_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33903_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33903_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33924_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33924_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33954_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33954_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33963_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 33963_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34006_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 34006_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19903_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 19903_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
