This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3754 2461302.8754 13.48 04:05:03.11 +17:55:18.0
174.63467 -24.95228 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -1 -0 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:05:03.11 +17:55:18.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:05:03.11 +17:55:18.0: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3754* 04 05 03.11 +17 55 18.0 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8754,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3754 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3754 2461302.8754 14.52 03:59:31.61 +15:00:00.2
176.03148 -27.90627 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.742 Edisona -1 -1 2 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:59:31.61 +15:00:00.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:59:31.61 +15:00:00.2: 15.55 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.25
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3754* 03 59 31.61 +15 00 00.2 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8754,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3754 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3754 2461302.8754 14.64 04:21:11.10 +17:40:42.8
177.61269 -22.23925 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1171 Rusthawelia -0 -0 0 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:11.10 +17:40:42.8: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:11.10 +17:40:42.8: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3754* 04 21 11.10 +17 40 42.8 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8754,14.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3754 14.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3754 2461302.8754 14.76 03:57:18.92 +11:56:50.8
178.21285 -30.35121 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.655 Briseis -1 -0 1 14.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:18.92 +11:56:50.8: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:18.92 +11:56:50.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3754* 03 57 18.92 +11 56 50.8 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8754,14.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3754 14.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3754 2461302.8754 13.93 03:55:14.07 +16:23:56.1
174.07892 -27.70358 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.443 Photographica 0 -2 2 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:55:14.07 +16:23:56.1: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:55:14.07 +16:23:56.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3754* 03 55 14.07 +16 23 56.1 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8754,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3754 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461302.87589082 19.09.2026 09:01:06.967 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8848
Objects passed selection criteria: 8842
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8377.75
Average stars matched: 8241.25 (98.3707 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235276 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 04:03:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461302.87589082 19.09.2026 09:01:06.967 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 59007
Objects passed selection criteria: 58875
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 55266.8
Average stars matched: 53634 (97.0457 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 277264 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 04:04:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.87489757
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:40.290 +14:00:03.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.290 +14:00:03.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0022 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:43.620 +14:00:35.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:43.620 +14:00:35.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0184 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:40.290 +14:00:03.02
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:43.620 +14:00:35.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01619 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VDggIvISZK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4iot8bU8RR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bwpbsGfKGK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K1S4KqU6s3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec +8.6216 to +19.2870 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec 8.6216 to 19.2870 deg
Loaded 4407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3650 out of 8488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.VDggIvISZK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=0, passed=9344
Got 9344 stars (including 8597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1309 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1429 n_q4=1041 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4iot8bU8RR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1, passed=8488
Got 8488 stars (including 7793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1282 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1405 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.472
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bwpbsGfKGK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=543, bad_region=0, passed=7979
Got 7979 stars (including 7423 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7979 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=11.976 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.297 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.430 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.303 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4877 robust_rms_before=1.242 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.305 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.303
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.305 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1061 n_q2=1389 n_q3=1135 n_q4=1292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.K1S4KqU6s3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=531, bad_region=0, passed=7954
Got 7954 stars (including 7407 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7954 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=12.217 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.335 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.447 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.470 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.300 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.315 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=1.255 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.314 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.300 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.323 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.315
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.323 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=1059 n_q2=1386 n_q3=1140 n_q4=1290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.050
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.263
ref2=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.472
new1=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.071
new2=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.050
reference average sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.3675
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410_astrometric_residuals.png (4877 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-59-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040144_TTUQ1b1x1_2456464_HYtYtUkP/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:51.58 +10:00:51.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:37:10.35 +12:12:46.7: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:57.82 +15:19:04.4: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:38.74 +11:19:32.0: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:31.61 +16:29:05.8: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:57.82 +15:19:04.4: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:51.58 +10:00:51.7: 9.85 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:38.74 +11:19:32.0: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:37:10.35 +12:12:46.7: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:31.61 +16:29:05.8: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:51.58 +10:00:51.7: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.41 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.74 +11:19:32.0: ref_mag=11.41 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7533 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:10.35 +12:12:46.7: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3727 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:57.82 +15:19:04.4: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3952 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:31.61 +16:29:05.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3904 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20182_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 20182_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:23.49 +10:56:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20183_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 20183_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20184_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 20184_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20403_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 20403_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20410_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 20410_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20413_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 20413_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:27.21 +16:33:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04086_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 04086_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.97 +14:32:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.71 +09:56:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75647_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75647_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75649_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75649_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75654_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75654_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75655_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75655_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75656_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75656_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75657_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75657_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75660_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75660_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75661_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75661_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75663_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75663_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75666_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75666_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75675_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75675_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75676_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75676_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:02.66 +16:54:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75677_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75677_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75678_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75678_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75680_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75680_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75681_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75681_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75685_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75685_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75686_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75686_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75687_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75687_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75688_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75688_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75689_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75689_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75691_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75691_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75692_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75692_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75944_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 75944_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:12.02 +13:30:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76037_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76037_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76059_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76059_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.88 +18:26:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76166_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76166_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:42.05 +10:53:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76181_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76181_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:59.62 +14:06:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76200_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 76200_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76284_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76284_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76427_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76427_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76498_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76498_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76502_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76502_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76516_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76516_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76520_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76520_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76543_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76543_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76620_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76620_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:34.21 +17:20:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76641_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76641_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76645_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76645_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76673_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76673_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76754_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76754_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76767_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76767_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76792_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 76792_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76830_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76830_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76850_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76850_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76863_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76863_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76866_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76866_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76896_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76896_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76908_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76908_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:58.29 +10:13:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76941_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 76941_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76962_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 76962_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77011_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77011_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:26.61 +09:55:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77050_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 77050_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77055_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77055_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77060_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77060_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77100_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77100_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77125_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77125_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77152_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77152_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77156_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77156_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77161_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77161_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77193_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77193_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77202_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77202_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77215_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77215_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77220_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77220_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77223_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77223_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77224_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77224_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77225_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77225_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77230_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77230_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77246_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77246_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77254_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77254_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77261_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77261_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77263_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77263_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77264_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77264_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77268_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77268_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77269_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77269_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77285_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77285_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77288_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77288_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77289_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77289_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77296_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77296_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77302_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77302_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77312_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77312_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77316_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77316_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77321_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77321_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77322_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77322_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77338_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77338_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77339_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77339_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77345_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77345_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77353_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77353_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77362_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77362_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77366_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77366_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77387_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77387_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77388_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77388_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77396_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77396_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77406_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77406_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77422_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77422_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77487_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 77487_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.72 +09:56:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:18.51 +11:10:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17062_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 17062_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 03602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.46 +18:37:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_04-01-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
