NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Tau-05-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.36454    2461302.86454    13.70    03:18:27.72 +10:16:22.4   2550 0969   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.64    03:18:27.70 +10:16:21.7   2550 0970   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 19.3648  2461302.8648  13.67  03:18:27.71 +10:16:22.1
171.58236 -38.33823 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
619 Triberga                -0     -0       1  13.8    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:27.71 +10:16:22.1:  16.13 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:27.71 +10:16:22.1:  16.12 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.36454    2461302.86454    14.20    03:50:21.91 +17:07:13.0   7273 5091   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.20    03:50:21.97 +17:07:13.5   7273 5093   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 19.3648  2461302.8648  14.20  03:50:21.94 +17:07:13.3
172.57426 -28.03465 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
131 Vala                    -0      1       1  14.6    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:50:21.94 +17:07:13.3:  16.07 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:50:21.94 +17:07:13.3:  16.09 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 2

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits
Field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 241911 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 241911 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits_preview.png'
Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits

renamed 'Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits_preview.png'
Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 561.0491 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 523.9986 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1085.7112 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 502.9259 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1086.3214 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 502.4570 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.93514 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T03:44:46.3675167' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T08:44:46.3675167' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.3644255442 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T08:44:56.2709313' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.364540162 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 53.3310456012621 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9996899401406 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 59.2469444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 123.383333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.16315846869886 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '03 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20459 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20459 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 28.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 15.50124 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/d_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits :) Spent 0.539167 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/d_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T03:45:27.2208126' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T08:45:27.2208126' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.3648983794 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T08:45:37.1218663' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.3650129745 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 53.3310455348681 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9996899259234 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 59.3688888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 123.616666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.16169351515203 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '03 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20459 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20459 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 28.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 15.50124 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/d_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits :) Spent 0.518649 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/d_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits


fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.86454128 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:20.018 +13:59:59.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 Second-epoch image center 03:33:20.018 +13:59:59.19 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0021 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:20.211 +13:59:49.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 Second-epoch image center 03:33:20.211 +13:59:49.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0014 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 03:33:20.018 +13:59:59.19 Second-epoch second image center 03:33:20.211 +13:59:49.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00284 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RFRDdiInW3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZEgCXte4Ub Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y48EaDh19P Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HBMh4CtuMY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950750 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950750 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec +8.6182 to +19.2791 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec 8.6182 to 19.2791 deg Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3736 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 7722 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 2.0 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 15.5 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.RFRDdiInW3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=551, bad_region=1716, passed=7716 Got 7716 stars (including 5573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1724 n_q2=1005 n_q3=1514 n_q4=651 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.261 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.ZEgCXte4Ub (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, bad_region=1716, passed=7722 Got 7722 stars (including 5589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1731 n_q2=1006 n_q3=1513 n_q4=648 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Y48EaDh19P (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=407, bad_region=1743, passed=6768 Got 6768 stars (including 4699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6768 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4597 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4587 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4588 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4587 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5385 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4596 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4587 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5385 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4587 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5385 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4587 stars left (next iteration limit 5045) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4587 robust_rms=7.297 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.556 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4587 robust_rms=0.455 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.574 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4587 robust_rms=0.337 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.363 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4587 robust_rms_before=1.025 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.342 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.337 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.369 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.363 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.369 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits N_match=4587 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.359 n_q1=1167 n_q2=773 n_q3=1660 n_q4=987 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.038 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.HBMh4CtuMY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=402, bad_region=1747, passed=6759 Got 6759 stars (including 4688 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6759 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4593 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4586 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4586 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4586 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5379 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4593 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4586 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5379 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4586 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5379 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4586 stars left (next iteration limit 5044) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4586 robust_rms=7.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.128 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4586 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.574 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4586 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.367 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4586 robust_rms_before=1.035 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.351 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.372 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.367 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.372 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits N_match=4586 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=1163 n_q2=776 n_q3=1662 n_q4=985 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.261 ref2=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.264 new1=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.038 new2=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.077 reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.2625 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137_astrometric_residuals.png (4894 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440_astrometric_residuals.png (4587 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441_astrometric_residuals.png (4586 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:21:42.81 +16:16:51.8: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:21:42.81 +16:16:51.8: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:42.81 +16:16:51.8: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3645 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20314_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 20314_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.36454    2461302.86454    12.38    03:21:42.79 +16:16:51.8   3113 4601   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    12.35    03:21:42.83 +16:16:51.8   3112 4602   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:20.018 +13:59:59.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 Second-epoch image center 03:33:20.018 +13:59:59.19 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0021 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:20.211 +13:59:49.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 Second-epoch image center 03:33:20.211 +13:59:49.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0014 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 03:33:20.018 +13:59:59.19 Second-epoch second image center 03:33:20.211 +13:59:49.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00284 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lFAZMmFvZt Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YBIDbX26dT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q1sx55BfxG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MGnO3OcqqA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.817800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.817800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.10 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 48560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec +8.6183 to +19.2794 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec 8.6183 to 19.2794 deg Loaded 4358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3320 out of 3753 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3753 out of 48560 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=4.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 56 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 1.9 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 2.1 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits 2.1 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 15.7 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 15.4 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits 15.4 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.lFAZMmFvZt (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2222, bad_region=8835, passed=48571 Got 48571 stars (including 37859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48571 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1704 n_q2=988 n_q3=1521 n_q4=680 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.YBIDbX26dT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2192, bad_region=8846, passed=48544 Got 48544 stars (including 37859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48544 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5379) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=1699 n_q2=994 n_q3=1515 n_q4=683 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.q1sx55BfxG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1703, bad_region=8143, passed=40203 Got 40203 stars (including 30803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40203 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34043 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34043 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34043 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=7.162 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.240 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.441 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.544 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.333 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.353 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=0.998 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.333 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.369 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.353 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.369 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=1292 n_q2=810 n_q3=1698 n_q4=1075 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.042 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.MGnO3OcqqA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1727, bad_region=8152, passed=40239 Got 40239 stars (including 30791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40239 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34054 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34054 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34054 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=7.069 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.724 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.457 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.567 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.342 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.371 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4882 robust_rms_before=1.002 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.351 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.342 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.381 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.371 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.381 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=1293 n_q2=801 n_q3=1713 n_q4=1075 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:32:32.73 +15:13:12.0: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:35:24.27 +17:58:22.5: 15.00 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:23:22.85 +13:38:11.5: 14.99 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:29.73 +13:36:50.9: 14.88 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:45:33.56 +12:52:25.0: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:27.71 +10:16:22.1: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:29.73 +13:36:50.9: 14.75 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:23:22.85 +13:38:11.5: 15.01 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:35:24.27 +17:58:22.5: 15.12 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:45:33.56 +12:52:25.0: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:32:32.73 +15:13:12.0: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:22.85 +13:38:11.5: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8616 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:29.73 +13:36:50.9: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.9822 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:24.27 +17:58:22.5: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9353 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:33.56 +12:52:25.0: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5211 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:32.73 +15:13:12.0: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7180 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:27.71 +10:16:22.1: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:50:21.94 +17:07:13.3: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:42:40.33 +15:09:56.3: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:18.74 +10:38:19.3: 14.55 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:50:21.94 +17:07:13.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:31:49.52 +15:08:04.5: 15.09 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:42:40.33 +15:09:56.3: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:40.33 +15:09:56.3: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3943 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:18.74 +10:38:19.3: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:18.74 +10:38:19.3: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5941 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:42:54.23 +15:02:02.4: 15.14 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:26:48.91 +17:32:15.8: 15.59 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:16:42.00 +10:41:39.3: 15.56 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:31:49.52 +15:08:04.5: 14.94 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:49.52 +15:08:04.5: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8663 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:42:54.23 +15:02:02.4: 15.24 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:26:48.91 +17:32:15.8: 15.61 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.60 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:16:42.00 +10:41:39.3: 15.53 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:54.23 +15:02:02.4: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0439 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:48.91 +17:32:15.8: ref_mag=15.60 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0388 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:42.00 +10:41:39.3: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0862 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56104.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57473.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52898_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 52898_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.36454    2461302.86454    15.02    03:35:24.28 +17:58:21.2   5107 5598   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.87    03:35:24.26 +17:58:23.7   5107 5600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52901_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 52901_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.36454    2461302.86454    14.98    03:34:29.74 +13:36:51.5   4958 2961   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.99    03:34:29.71 +13:36:50.3   4957 2962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52903_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 52903_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.36454    2461302.86454    14.84    03:23:22.79 +13:38:10.5   3325 2995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.88    03:23:22.91 +13:38:12.4   3325 2997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52907_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 52907_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.36454    2461302.86454    14.67    03:45:33.57 +12:52:24.9   6586 2511   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.43    03:45:33.56 +12:52:25.2   6586 2512   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52909_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 52909_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.39    03:28:15.47 +17:35:41.7   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52912_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 52912_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.81    03:28:01.91 +18:05:24.5   4045 5683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits **** FOUND 03:28:01.92 +18:05:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52913_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 52913_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.36454    2461302.86454    12.84    03:32:32.66 +15:13:12.0   4680 3933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    12.63    03:32:32.80 +15:13:11.9   4680 3935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53248_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 53248_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    10.77    03:50:28.07 +11:53:49.7   7319 1924   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53277_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 53277_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    10.90    03:27:05.83 +14:02:44.3   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53626_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 53626_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    11.74    03:47:51.72 +10:20:58.6   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53778_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 53778_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    12.00    03:28:10.98 +12:20:37.5   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55388_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 55388_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.21    03:19:15.77 +17:53:17.6   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55554_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 55554_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.45    03:36:02.16 +16:29:19.6   5193 4699   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits **** FOUND 03:36:02.14 +16:29:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55819_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 55819_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.56    03:15:15.17 +16:11:08.4   2168 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55846_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 55846_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.65    03:37:56.99 +16:24:58.0   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56066_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 56066_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.61    03:49:06.03 +11:16:36.9   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56104_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 Preparing report for the candidate 56104_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56183_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 56183_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.70    03:48:09.69 +17:35:23.0   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56200_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 56200_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.70    03:44:53.07 +12:06:56.9   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56341_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 56341_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.88    03:25:24.63 +10:05:16.9   3587 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56359_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 56359_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.65    03:23:25.45 +13:30:52.9   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56606_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 56606_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.92    03:15:19.43 +10:06:47.7   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56715_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 56715_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.78    03:48:19.64 +10:39:22.7   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56779_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 56779_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.80    03:47:59.02 +13:34:48.8   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56877_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 56877_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.98    03:28:38.48 +18:03:36.0   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56899_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 56899_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.03    03:15:55.51 +14:24:30.6   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57135_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 57135_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.94    03:29:26.33 +11:13:16.6   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57242_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 57242_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.09    03:42:37.73 +14:25:26.8   6151 3449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57259_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 57259_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.28    03:46:40.29 +16:14:44.6   6738 4555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57459_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 57459_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.13    03:27:06.19 +13:23:49.3   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57473_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 Preparing report for the candidate 57473_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57509_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 57509_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.36    03:34:39.15 +14:17:14.1   4983 3369   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57570_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 57570_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.03    03:45:16.25 +10:07:08.0   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57613_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 57613_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.12    03:22:30.48 +09:50:29.2   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57903_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 57903_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.55    03:16:42.95 +11:58:56.1   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57971_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 57971_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.94    03:15:40.20 +16:56:20.5   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58044_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 58044_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.36454    2461302.86454    14.40    03:42:40.33 +15:09:57.1   6157 3896   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.39    03:42:40.32 +15:09:55.5   6157 3897   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58306_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 58306_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.50    03:43:31.70 +14:59:08.4   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58641_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 58641_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.36454    2461302.86454    14.58    03:34:18.71 +10:38:19.3   4918 1160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.62    03:34:18.76 +10:38:19.3   4918 1162   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58723_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 58723_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.61    03:17:03.82 +11:59:50.7   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58852_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 58852_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.61    03:42:58.62 +13:42:46.0   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58976_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 58976_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.36    03:23:40.91 +10:12:06.8   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58991_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 58991_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.32    03:44:17.75 +13:42:49.0   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59254_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 59254_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.92    03:16:03.50 +16:38:21.8   2293 4842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59332_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 59332_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.64    03:22:25.36 +10:03:39.7   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59409_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 59409_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.80    03:20:16.49 +14:28:52.0   2879 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59471_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 59471_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.62    03:47:03.15 +16:24:58.6   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59730_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 59730_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.51    03:32:30.41 +16:39:40.8   4682 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59863_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 59863_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.72    03:42:25.86 +15:40:44.3   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 59866_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 59866_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.36454    2461302.86454    14.88    03:31:49.49 +15:08:04.6   4575 3883   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.85    03:31:49.55 +15:08:04.4   4574 3884   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60007_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 60007_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    15.07    03:26:57.35 +17:28:47.3   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60158_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 60158_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    14.76    03:43:40.81 +15:07:33.7   6304 3874   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60203_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 60203_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.36454    2461302.86454    15.03    03:26:48.93 +17:32:14.8   3866 5348   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    15.04    03:26:48.88 +17:32:16.8   3865 5350   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60243_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 60243_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.36454    2461302.86454    15.09    03:16:42.06 +10:41:39.2   2293 1230   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    15.08    03:16:41.94 +10:41:39.5   2292 1232   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60266_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 60266_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.36454    2461302.86454    15.05    03:42:54.23 +15:02:01.9   6191 3816   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-44-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0440.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    15.04    03:42:54.23 +15:02:02.8   6191 3818   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 37088_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 The candidate 37088_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 19.36501    2461302.86501    13.60    03:33:21.67 +10:25:05.6   4775 1029   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_035937_TTUQ2b1x1_2407121_WHzHmvwu/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-45-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0441.fits **** FOUND 03:33:21.65 +10:25:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 03:18:27.71 +10:16:22.1 03:50:21.94 +17:07:13.3 ########### Completed Tau-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 03:18:27.71 +10:16:22.1 03:50:21.94 +17:07:13.3 ################################################################################### 03:18:27.71 +10:16:22.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 03:50:21.94 +17:07:13.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.86454128 -observatory V36 12:49:41.81 -05:38:51.3 Mercury (-0.3mag) 14:01:35.25 -18:30:58.0 Venus (-4.8mag) 07:45:52.53 +22:02:31.8 Mars (1.2mag) 09:18:41.58 +16:15:60.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:48:42.02 +02:17:39.8 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:34.64 +21:01:43.7 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:12:33.81 -00:11:08.5 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:52.03 -23:41:54.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 18:03:41.73 -28:07:56.1 Moon (-10.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 19 04:01 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.86454128: 09:18:48.94 +16:15:22.8 Io (6.0mag) 09:18:41.22 +16:16:02.1 Europa (6.2mag) 09:18:51.51 +16:15:10.5 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:18:38.51 +16:16:15.7 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:16:59.21 +16:36:43.6 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:18:44.99 +16:15:43.8 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:16:25.09 +16:31:05.3 Elara (17.7mag) 09:22:13.45 +15:40:32.8 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:18:53.89 +16:37:07.8 Carme (18.9mag) 00:48:53.48 +02:17:32.9 Titan (8.3mag) 00:48:41.67 +02:17:42.7 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:48:22.86 +02:18:15.9 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:48:25.84 +02:17:36.7 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:47:17.07 +02:06:23.8 Phoebe (16.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 19 04:02 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.86454128: 23:47:11.76 +12:35:17.1 JWST 14:19:28.33 +53:00:46.5 Chandra 12:02:37.09 -61:28:55.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 19 04:01 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.86454128 -observatory V36 03:45:53.74 +19:48:40.5 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:08:28.58 -33:58:39.3 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:28:00.67 -71:00:03.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:38.03 +34:01:22.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:03:57.09 +46:59:58.2 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:04:21.15 +27:06:10.6 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:18:41.64 +25:45:46.1 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 11:00:31.51 +26:49:44.9 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:56:09.36 +05:09:53.8 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:25.75 -16:42:07.6 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:48:15.74 +33:42:25.9 16.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:08:39.37 +15:11:45.3 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:27:50.85 +42:37:47.2 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:10:51.01 +48:27:23.5 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:41:11.21 -13:13:10.7 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:14:50.01 +16:03:12.7 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:37:54.98 +17:48:27.7 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:29:59.36 -00:52:25.1 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:17:49.14 +71:46:01.4 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:57:59.88 +45:33:55.1 17.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:24:35.09 +12:16:24.1 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:36:19.42 -35:02:04.0 13.7mag 10P/Tempel 01:38:15.03 +39:00:48.3 17.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:56:18.97 -06:23:41.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:32:51.83 -08:51:33.4 17.8mag 63P/Wild 07:01:37.66 +18:14:08.3 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:15:30.37 +15:00:39.0 16.8mag 88P/Howell 06:19:27.19 +33:06:52.3 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:06:25.51 +21:27:21.8 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:54:28.88 +18:14:54.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:13:44.87 -25:26:05.1 17.6mag 124P/Mrkos 06:31:10.44 +20:13:23.4 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 01:23:26.88 -14:44:37.4 14.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:34:03.98 +07:55:22.4 12.6mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:41.62 +07:18:30.9 14.6mag 220P/McNaught 05:19:06.41 +39:51:19.4 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 09:03:09.87 +34:18:07.1 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:33:40.73 -01:35:14.0 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:37:59.26 +16:14:29.9 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 19 04:01 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 19 04:01 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 19 04:01 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:45:20.862 -05:19:19.97 AT 2026aacc 2026-08-23.15 19.4444 15:56:38.169 +18:42:01.63 SN 2026aacb 2026-08-29.18 19.5538 20:55:37.041 -01:27:15.88 AT 2026aaca 2026-08-30.60 19.51 14:43:57.052 -18:28:53.81 SN 2026aabz 2026-08-30.23 18.705 13:37:12.730 -32:27:40.17 AT 2026aaby 2026-08-30.72 18.545 06:50:17.864 +20:05:46.74 AT 2026aabx 2026-08-30.61 17.869 05:36:22.321 -31:19:59.16 AT 2026aabw 2026-08-30.79 18.65 17:26:25.715 +35:28:47.48 AT 2026aabv 2026-08-30.35 18.678 03:41:51.198 -40:54:09.63 AT 2026aabu 2026-08-22.78 20.13 15:50:13.320 -33:32:57.31 AT 2026aabt 2026-08-29.37 19.72 01:18:28.460 -27:05:47.26 SN 2026aabs 2026-08-27.78 19.28 22:23:15.798 -29:48:02.93 AT 2026aabr 2026-08-30.57 19.11 23:23:45.523 -29:23:36.22 SN 2026aabq 2026-08-23.58 19.7 22:48:33.213 -45:12:00.11 AT 2026aabp 2026-08-30.61 18.75 00:44:54.260 +41:33:10.49 AT 2026aabo 2026-08-29.40 18.5784 01:36:46.683 +30:41:53.77 AT 2026aabn 2026-08-28.69 20.82 01:39:53.640 +34:03:40.40 AT 2026aabm 2026-08-26.73 20.83 00:25:36.720 +41:26:16.16 AT 2026aabl 2026-08-26.72 20.57 00:06:22.110 +41:47:11.52 AT 2026aabk 2026-08-23.72 21.3 16:34:18.591 +32:50:04.19 AT 2026aabj 2026-08-23.59 21.08 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 19 04:01 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 64 C