fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 19.37123 | 2461302.87123 | 11.78 | 07:42:53.75 +31:11:55.2 | 2607 4020 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.37170 | 2461302.87170 | 11.75 | 07:42:53.77 +31:11:54.9 | 2606 4023 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3715 2461302.8715 11.77 07:42:53.76 +31:11:55.0
188.76585 23.93485 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
89 Julia 0 0 0 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:42:53.76 +31:11:55.0: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:42:53.76 +31:11:55.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference image | 2026 03 20.16451 | 2461119.66451 | 14.68 | 07:43:15.23 +29:28:16.5 | 7007 3531 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits |
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 19.37123 | 2461302.87123 | 13.15 | 07:43:14.74 +29:28:33.7 | 2589 2976 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.37170 | 2461302.87170 | 13.15 | 07:43:14.84 +29:28:32.0 | 2588 2979 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3715 2461302.8715 13.15 07:43:14.79 +29:28:32.8
190.57475 23.45501 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
141 Lumen 1 -1 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:43:14.79 +29:28:32.8: 15.73 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:43:14.79 +29:28:32.8: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.73 +/- 0.25
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Gem-02-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Gem-02-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing Gem-02-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 244796 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 244796 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits_preview.png'
Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
renamed 'Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits_preview.png'
Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 516.5709 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 634.3629 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1585.4739 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 525.0528 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1580.1535 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 525.5518 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.06923 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T03:54:24.2604187' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T08:54:24.2604187' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.3711141204 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T08:54:34.1638028' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.3712287382 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 119.99598192703 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9996702932411 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.7855555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 64.2388888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.63052417321121 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 61.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 32.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.00104 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/d_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits :) Spent 0.487551 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/d_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T03:55:05.2819529' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T08:55:05.2819529' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.3715889007 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T08:55:15.1870704' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.371703553 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 119.9959818523 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9996703096694 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.9169444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 64.3183333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.60210398199925 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 61.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 32.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.00104 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/d_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits :) Spent 0.483317 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/d_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.87122986 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits Image size: 940.5'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:59:55.861 +29:59:07.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89 Second-epoch image center 07:59:55.861 +29:59:07.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0634 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Image size: 940.4'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:59:56.452 +29:58:48.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89 Second-epoch image center 07:59:56.452 +29:58:48.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0659 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 07:59:55.861 +29:59:07.80 Second-epoch second image center 07:59:56.452 +29:58:48.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00567 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NdBGZ4EUxA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zg7N0yfQ9u Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ouMCBQK5yN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qJZh4yiMn8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3033 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3033 deg Loaded 9471 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7174 out of 7671 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7671 out of 14578 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.914800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.914800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3033 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6187 to 129.5943 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3033 deg Loaded 9471 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7174 out of 7671 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7671 out of 14578 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6179 to 129.5933 deg, Dec +24.4235 to +35.3042 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6179 to 129.5933 deg, Dec 24.4235 to 35.3042 deg Loaded 9472 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7195 out of 7687 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7687 out of 14611 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 2.3 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 2.2 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 2.2 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.NdBGZ4EUxA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1032, bad_region=4309, passed=14578 Got 14578 stars (including 9556 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11099 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11099 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11099 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5409) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=1419 n_q2=1048 n_q3=1415 n_q4=1035 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135 The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.zg7N0yfQ9u (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1022, bad_region=4298, passed=14611 Got 14611 stars (including 9609 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11135 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11135 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11135 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1429 n_q2=1049 n_q3=1407 n_q4=1033 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.121 The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.ouMCBQK5yN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=351, bad_region=873, passed=6427 Got 6427 stars (including 5225 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6427 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5751 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5751 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5751 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5354) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=5.881 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.972 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.521 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.457 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4866 robust_rms_before=1.242 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.390 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.412 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.457 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.412 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1768 n_q2=664 n_q3=1730 n_q4=704 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.qJZh4yiMn8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, bad_region=879, passed=6482 Got 6482 stars (including 5263 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6482 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013061 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010449 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5804 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5804 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5804 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5357) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=5.950 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.364 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.547 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.434 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.455 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=1.226 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.409 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.434 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.434 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.455 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.434 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=1755 n_q2=679 n_q3=1728 n_q4=708 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.135 ref2=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.121 new1=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.097 new2=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits sigma_overall=0.422 worst_q_ratio=1.092 reference average sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.128 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124_astrometric_residuals.png (4917 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448_astrometric_residuals.png (4866 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449_astrometric_residuals.png (4870 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21092_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 21092_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 07:45:27.66 +30:46:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21861_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 21861_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 10.33 07:45:27.66 +30:46:39.5 2924 3749 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:56:56.08 +31:10:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits Image size: 940.5'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:59:55.861 +29:59:07.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89 Second-epoch image center 07:59:55.861 +29:59:07.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0634 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Image size: 940.4'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:59:56.452 +29:58:48.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:08.083 +30:01:51.89 Second-epoch image center 07:59:56.452 +29:58:48.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0659 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 07:59:55.861 +29:59:07.80 Second-epoch second image center 07:59:56.452 +29:58:48.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00567 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B8TFC5PukJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rVOiTKcLBz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zS817Gls4G Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hX4DtfpydM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_ Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 11.28 07:56:56.06 +31:10:00.8 4418 3922 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits .fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3078 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3078 deg Loaded 9497 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6453 out of 7790 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7790 out of 84052 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.12 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.66 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec +24.4211 to +35.3078 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6080 to 129.6441 deg, Dec 24.4211 to 35.3078 deg Loaded 9497 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6453 out of 7790 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7790 out of 84052 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=4.9) Read 84140 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6079 to 129.6139 deg, Dec +24.4235 to +35.3111 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6079 to 129.6139 deg, Dec 24.4235 to 35.3111 deg Loaded 9490 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6470 out of 7805 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7805 out of 84140 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 2.1 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 15.7 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.B8TFC5PukJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=6475, bad_region=21994, passed=84020 Got 84020 stars (including 57346 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84020 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67367 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67367 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67367 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=1467 n_q2=1076 n_q3=1368 n_q4=1012 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133 The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.rVOiTKcLBz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=6514, bad_region=21982, passed=84110 Got 84110 stars (including 57428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84110 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67461 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67461 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67461 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1468 n_q2=1084 n_q3=1364 n_q4=1007 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105 The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.zS817Gls4G (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1645, bad_region=3891, passed=42662 Got 42662 stars (including 37233 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42662 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4859 stars left (next iteration limit 5344) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=5.535 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.666 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.524 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=0.417 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.461 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4859 robust_rms_before=1.241 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.385 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.417 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.407 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.461 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.407 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits N_match=4859 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1785 n_q2=631 n_q3=1719 n_q4=724 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.hX4DtfpydM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1677, bad_region=3899, passed=43029 Got 43029 stars (including 37540 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43029 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013061 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010449 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4863 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40158 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40158 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40158 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5348) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=5.685 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.519 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.551 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=0.433 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.448 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4862 robust_rms_before=1.232 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.405 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.433 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.425 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.448 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.425 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=1775 n_q2=646 n_q3=1716 n_q4=725 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:54:35.21 +28:23:38.5: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:42:53.76 +31:11:55.0: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:15:44.97 +31:46:25.4: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:54:35.21 +28:23:38.5: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:54:35.21 +28:23:38.5: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.3346 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:42:53.76 +31:11:55.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:15:44.97 +31:46:25.4: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:15:44.97 +31:46:25.4: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4010 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:44:33.66 +27:11:58.8: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:44:33.66 +27:11:58.8: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:44:33.66 +27:11:58.8: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4250 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:43:14.79 +29:28:32.8: 15.73 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:43:14.79 +29:28:32.8: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.73 +/- 0.25 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:43:14.79 +29:28:32.8: ref_mag=15.73 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=13.1513 delta=2.58 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100778.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45834.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98804_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 98804_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 09 19.37123 2461302.87123 14.28 07:54:35.15 +28:23:38.6 4056 2254 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98812_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 98812_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 14.41 07:54:35.27 +28:23:38.4 4055 2257 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:42:50.09 +33:24:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98814_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 98814_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.80 07:42:50.17 +33:24:30.1 2679 5362 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:39:46.07 +30:45:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98816_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 98816_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.57 07:39:46.05 +30:45:06.8 2181 3779 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:52:49.38 +29:44:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98817_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 98817_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.49 07:52:49.34 +29:44:11.6 3854 3076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:48:52.93 +25:41:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98818_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 98818_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.51 07:48:52.97 +25:41:48.9 3217 0651 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:42:55.28 +27:35:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98819_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 98819_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.33 07:42:55.31 +27:35:40.2 2474 1843 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 08:20:12.00 +31:29:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98820_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 98820_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.12 08:20:12.00 +31:29:34.9 7422 4113 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 08:10:16.86 +28:49:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98821_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 98821_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.20 08:10:16.87 +28:49:13.3 6138 2480 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:45:11.20 +25:40:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98823_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 98823_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.21 07:45:11.18 +25:40:38.5 2712 0662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 08:14:29.74 +27:17:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 99337_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 99337_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 12.13 08:14:29.82 +27:17:26.4 6703 1556 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 99401_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 99401_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 10.05 08:19:07.01 +27:53:04.2 7319 1924 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 100107_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 100107_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 10.39 07:52:56.27 +30:00:03.2 3875 3235 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 100309_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 100309_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 11.07 08:16:12.18 +26:20:26.7 6939 0981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:56:56.08 +31:10:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 100394_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 100394_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 11.39 07:56:56.07 +31:10:01.1 4419 3922 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 100778_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 Preparing report for the candidate 100778_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 101431_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 101431_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 11.47 07:54:20.14 +28:18:16.1 4020 2204 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:43:57.67 +25:46:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 102788_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 102788_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 12.06 07:43:57.70 +25:46:39.9 2547 0732 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.37123 2461302.87123 12.37 08:15:44.98 +31:46:25.1 6846 4268 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103269_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 103269_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 12.44 08:15:44.95 +31:46:25.6 6845 4271 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:56:12.73 +29:49:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103301_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 103301_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 12.72 07:56:12.74 +29:49:10.2 4299 3111 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:53:25.48 +26:44:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103486_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 103486_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 12.62 07:53:25.48 +26:44:40.6 3862 1264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:42:50.76 +34:00:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103916_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 103916_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 12.92 07:42:50.79 +34:00:35.9 2703 5728 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:41:26.95 +29:02:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 104231_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 104231_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 12.95 07:41:26.95 +29:02:48.1 2334 2734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 08:14:34.92 +26:43:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 104367_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 104367_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 12.81 08:14:34.86 +26:43:05.3 6717 1209 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 104496_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 104496_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 12.76 08:12:54.79 +28:06:46.6 6488 2053 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:49:54.74 +27:26:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 104708_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 104708_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.06 07:49:54.78 +27:26:03.4 3408 1700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 105066_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 105066_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 12.92 07:43:30.03 +33:47:18.8 2777 5588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 105376_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 105376_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.14 07:51:31.44 +26:01:58.6 3587 0841 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:47:32.56 +33:27:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 105482_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 105482_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.42 07:47:32.65 +33:27:00.8 3276 5352 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 105846_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 105846_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.30 07:39:14.93 +32:03:01.4 2168 4570 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 08:16:55.84 +30:20:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 105853_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 105853_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.04 08:16:55.87 +30:20:13.1 7008 3404 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 105993_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 105993_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.35 07:48:53.45 +29:26:50.5 3330 2923 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.37123 2461302.87123 13.37 07:44:33.69 +27:11:59.0 2682 1588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 105994_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 105994_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.49 07:44:33.63 +27:11:58.5 2680 1592 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:46:57.02 +26:00:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 106016_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 106016_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.17 07:46:56.98 +26:00:36.3 2964 0853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 106018_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 106018_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.36 08:05:00.44 +32:24:44.7 5470 4654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 08:07:05.92 +27:04:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 107001_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 107001_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.16 08:07:05.88 +27:04:16.1 5708 1423 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:53:12.09 +27:54:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 107233_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 107233_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.52 07:53:12.09 +27:54:04.9 3860 1965 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:40:22.74 +28:48:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 107494_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 107494_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.78 07:40:22.74 +28:48:29.2 2182 2598 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 08:20:02.32 +28:27:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 107591_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 107591_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.33 08:20:02.42 +28:27:15.1 7436 2272 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:48:42.84 +30:53:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 107596_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 107596_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.51 07:48:42.85 +30:53:34.3 3349 3797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:56:13.95 +29:49:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 107649_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 107649_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.38 07:56:14.04 +29:49:28.5 4302 3114 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 08:03:06.83 +27:56:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 108164_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 108164_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.66 08:03:06.86 +27:56:46.4 5181 1959 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 08:03:54.99 +28:01:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 108219_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 108219_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.57 08:03:55.00 +28:01:00.4 5289 2000 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 108246_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 108246_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.17 08:17:35.14 +27:16:00.5 7119 1546 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:58:06.07 +33:23:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 108509_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 108509_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.46 07:58:06.04 +33:23:12.5 4607 5260 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 108567_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 108567_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.50 08:10:22.00 +30:25:25.9 6151 3449 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:43:28.40 +25:39:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 108731_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 108731_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.84 07:43:28.26 +25:39:05.2 2476 0658 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 108764_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 108764_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.85 07:40:27.46 +25:58:53.1 2076 0882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 109480_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 109480_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.20 08:16:43.21 +26:38:49.4 7007 1168 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 08:03:48.02 +27:46:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 109494_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 109494_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.84 08:03:48.01 +27:46:23.2 5271 1853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 109515_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 109515_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.32 08:16:39.52 +33:35:15.2 6950 5374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 109602_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 109602_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.84 07:56:46.48 +32:52:30.3 4430 4955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 110663_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 110663_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.74 07:54:13.94 +34:01:27.5 4133 5663 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 08:09:48.73 +28:07:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 111076_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 111076_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.77 08:09:48.83 +28:07:52.1 6075 2063 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 08:05:40.67 +27:30:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 111308_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 111308_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.78 08:05:40.67 +27:30:22.9 5520 1688 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 111410_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 111410_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.94 07:40:20.81 +30:16:49.8 2238 3489 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 111536_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 111536_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 13.93 07:53:01.06 +29:21:08.2 3870 2843 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 111629_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 111629_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 14.53 07:50:23.70 +34:03:06.8 3652 5700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 111662_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 111662_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 14.29 07:39:34.45 +32:48:26.6 2241 5026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 111717_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 111717_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 14.20 08:18:38.43 +26:36:01.0 7268 1143 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 The candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 14.17 07:41:38.59 +30:56:01.2 2433 3873 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits **** FOUND 07:45:27.66 +30:46:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 45834_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 Preparing report for the candidate 45834_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 07:42:53.76 +31:11:55.0 07:43:14.79 +29:28:32.8 ########### Completed Gem-02-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 07:42:53.76 +31:11:55.0 07:43:14.79 +29:28:32.8 ################################################################################### 07:42:53.76 +31:11:55.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 07:43:14.79 +29:28:32.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.87122986 -observatory V36 12:49:44.03 -05:39:08.5 Mercury (-0.3mag) 14:01:35.96 -18:31:04.6 Venus (-4.8mag) 07:45:53.56 +22:02:29.7 Mars (1.2mag) 09:18:41.90 +16:15:58.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:48:41.91 +02:17:39.0 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:34.63 +21:01:43.7 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:12:33.77 -00:11:08.8 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:52.01 -23:41:54.9 Pluto (14.5mag) 18:04:06.72 -28:06:51.8 Moon (-10.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 19 03:59 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.87122986: 09:18:49.24 +16:15:21.5 Io (6.0mag) 09:18:41.64 +16:16:00.1 Europa (6.2mag) 09:18:51.90 +16:15:08.7 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:18:38.75 +16:16:14.7 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:16:59.54 +16:36:42.3 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:18:45.44 +16:15:41.8 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:16:25.42 +16:31:04.1 Elara (17.7mag) 09:22:13.75 +15:40:31.4 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:18:54.17 +16:37:06.5 Carme (18.9mag) 00:48:53.36 +02:17:32.2 Titan (8.3mag) 00:48:41.51 +02:17:42.1 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:48:22.73 +02:18:15.1 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:48:25.73 +02:17:35.9 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:47:16.95 +02:06:23.1 Phoebe (16.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 19 04:00 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.87122986: 23:47:13.10 +12:35:33.0 JWST 14:23:13.28 +52:57:28.2 Chandra 12:08:00.75 -61:36:35.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 19 03:59 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.87122986 -observatory V36 03:45:53.85 +19:48:41.3 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:08:28.81 -33:58:38.8 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:28:00.93 -71:00:05.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:38.04 +34:01:23.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:03:57.30 +47:00:01.0 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:04:20.87 +27:06:07.3 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:18:41.90 +25:45:45.8 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 11:00:31.88 +26:49:44.2 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:56:09.61 +05:09:53.7 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:25.73 -16:42:09.7 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:48:16.04 +33:42:27.7 16.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:08:39.46 +15:11:45.0 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:27:50.72 +42:37:45.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:10:50.54 +48:27:21.4 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:41:11.37 -13:13:11.1 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:14:50.09 +16:03:07.5 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:37:55.66 +17:48:25.8 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:29:59.72 -00:52:27.1 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:17:50.53 +71:45:56.1 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:57:59.55 +45:33:53.6 17.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:24:35.47 +12:16:26.2 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:36:19.75 -35:02:02.2 13.7mag 10P/Tempel 01:38:15.60 +39:00:51.0 17.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:56:19.25 -06:23:43.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:32:52.65 -08:51:40.8 17.8mag 63P/Wild 07:01:38.36 +18:14:06.1 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:15:30.22 +15:00:38.8 16.8mag 88P/Howell 06:19:28.59 +33:07:01.0 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:06:26.62 +21:27:14.7 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:54:29.75 +18:14:49.1 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:13:45.80 -25:26:13.0 17.6mag 124P/Mrkos 06:31:10.86 +20:13:22.5 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 01:23:23.65 -14:44:27.2 14.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:34:04.38 +07:55:13.6 12.6mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:41.74 +07:18:28.3 14.6mag 220P/McNaught 05:19:07.37 +39:51:26.1 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 09:03:10.87 +34:18:04.2 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:33:41.04 -01:35:16.6 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:37:59.60 +16:14:28.8 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 19 03:59 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 19 03:59 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 19 03:59 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:45:20.862 -05:19:19.97 AT 2026aacc 2026-08-23.15 19.4444 15:56:38.169 +18:42:01.63 SN 2026aacb 2026-08-29.18 19.5538 20:55:37.041 -01:27:15.88 AT 2026aaca 2026-08-30.60 19.51 14:43:57.052 -18:28:53.81 SN 2026aabz 2026-08-30.23 18.705 13:37:12.730 -32:27:40.17 AT 2026aaby 2026-08-30.72 18.545 06:50:17.864 +20:05:46.74 AT 2026aabx 2026-08-30.61 17.869 05:36:22.321 -31:19:59.16 AT 2026aabw 2026-08-30.79 18.65 17:26:25.715 +35:28:47.48 AT 2026aabv 2026-08-30.35 18.678 03:41:51.198 -40:54:09.63 AT 2026aabu 2026-08-22.78 20.13 15:50:13.320 -33:32:57.31 AT 2026aabt 2026-08-29.37 19.72 01:18:28.460 -27:05:47.26 SN 2026aabs 2026-08-27.78 19.28 22:23:15.798 -29:48:02.93 AT 2026aabr 2026-08-30.57 19.11 23:23:45.523 -29:23:36.22 SN 2026aabq 2026-08-23.58 19.7 22:48:33.213 -45:12:00.11 AT 2026aabp 2026-08-30.61 18.75 00:44:54.260 +41:33:10.49 AT 2026aabo 2026-08-29.40 18.5784 01:36:46.683 +30:41:53.77 AT 2026aabn 2026-08-28.69 20.82 01:39:53.640 +34:03:40.40 AT 2026aabm 2026-08-26.73 20.83 00:25:36.720 +41:26:16.16 AT 2026aabl 2026-08-26.72 20.57 00:06:22.110 +41:47:11.52 AT 2026aabk 2026-08-23.72 21.3 16:34:18.591 +32:50:04.19 AT 2026aabj 2026-08-23.59 21.08 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 19 03:59 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 09 19.37170 2461302.87170 10.57 07:45:27.65 +30:46:39.5 2924 3749 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_035735_TTUQ2b1x1_2308077_ju8ZFvp5/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-55-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0449.fits
