This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3708 2461302.8708 11.40 02:15:25.86 +12:20:05.5
152.94568 -45.58548 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.46 Hestia 0 -0 0 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:15:25.86 +12:20:05.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:15:25.86 +12:20:05.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3708* 02 15 25.86 +12 20 05.5 11.4 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8708,11.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3708 11.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3708 2461302.8708 12.20 01:40:22.71 +09:44:45.0
142.43095 -51.26358 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.124 Alkeste 0 0 0 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:40:22.71 +09:44:45.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:40:22.71 +09:44:45.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8708,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3708 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3708 2461302.8708 12.70 01:37:24.79 +16:11:17.6
138.71000 -45.27037 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.212 Medea -0 1 1 12.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:37:24.79 +16:11:17.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:37:24.79 +16:11:17.6: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8708,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3708 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3708 2461302.8708 13.53 01:50:04.69 +13:29:42.7
144.06584 -46.95609 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.147 Protogeneia -0 -0 0 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:50:04.69 +13:29:42.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:50:04.69 +13:29:42.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3708* 01 50 04.69 +13 29 42.7 13.5 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8708,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3708 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3708 2461302.8708 13.69 01:39:29.44 +16:42:41.1
139.20101 -44.63703 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1317 Silvretta -0 -0 0 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:39:29.44 +16:42:41.1: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:39:29.44 +16:42:41.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8708,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3708 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3708 2461302.8708 13.64 01:35:23.07 +15:02:45.9
138.43932 -46.49819 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.517 Edith -0 0 0 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:35:23.07 +15:02:45.9: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:35:23.07 +15:02:45.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8708,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3708 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3708 2461302.8708 13.69 01:50:45.20 +09:33:34.6
146.35819 -50.59448 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.167 Urda 0 -0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:50:45.20 +09:33:34.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:50:45.20 +09:33:34.6: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8708,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3708 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3708 2461302.8708 13.88 01:48:27.80 +15:43:14.4
142.50913 -44.97242 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1572 Posnania 0 -1 1 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:48:27.80 +15:43:14.4: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:48:27.80 +15:43:14.4: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3708* 01 48 27.80 +15 43 14.4 13.9 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8708,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3708 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3708 2461302.8708 14.15 02:03:50.79 +10:28:27.4
150.38957 -48.49916 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.401 Ottilia -0 0 0 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:03:50.79 +10:28:27.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:03:50.79 +10:28:27.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8708,14.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3708 14.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3708 2461302.8708 14.85 01:55:38.93 +12:38:33.5
146.37018 -47.28587 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2675 Tolkien 0 0 0 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:55:38.93 +12:38:33.5: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:55:38.93 +12:38:33.5: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3708* 01 55 38.93 +12 38 33.5 14.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8708,14.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3708 14.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
First image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Last image: 2461302.87116822 19.09.2026 08:54:18.934 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7479
Objects passed selection criteria: 7474
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7109
Average stars matched: 6963.75 (97.9568 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233560 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 03:57:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
First image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Last image: 2461302.87116822 19.09.2026 08:54:18.934 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 133
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41517
Objects passed selection criteria: 41377
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39693.5
Average stars matched: 38093.8 (95.9697 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 261872 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 03:58:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.87040800
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:24.046 +14:00:24.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31
Second-epoch image center 01:46:24.046 +14:00:24.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0641 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:21.444 +14:00:25.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31
Second-epoch image center 01:46:21.444 +14:00:25.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0746 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:46:24.046 +14:00:24.62
Second-epoch second image center 01:46:21.444 +14:00:25.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01052 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IpEsrffIHf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ajvvYINnkN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gF7xkYzmtT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7RkkzvPmbw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec +8.6498 to +19.2740 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec 8.6498 to 19.2740 deg
Loaded 4730 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3851 out of 4065 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4065 out of 7679 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec +8.6498 to +19.2740 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec 8.6498 to 19.2740 deg
Loaded 4730 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3851 out of 4065 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4065 out of 7679 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6762 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.4566 to 34.9567 deg, Dec +8.6053 to +19.2739 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.4566 to 34.9567 deg, Dec 8.6053 to 19.2739 deg
Loaded 4732 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3812 out of 4016 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4016 out of 6762 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
2.0 pix Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.IpEsrffIHf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, bad_region=0, passed=7679
Got 7679 stars (including 7121 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7679 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.217 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.200 n_q1=1261 n_q2=1216 n_q3=1199 n_q4=1197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.365
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits -region wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ajvvYINnkN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=519, bad_region=0, passed=6762
Got 6762 stars (including 6236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6762 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.239 n_q1=1250 n_q2=1227 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.449
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -region wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gF7xkYzmtT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=543, bad_region=1, passed=7108
Got 7108 stars (including 6554 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7108 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=10.959 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.972 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.632 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=1.115 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.400 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.394
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.400 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1330 n_q2=1172 n_q3=1217 n_q4=1150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7RkkzvPmbw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=542, bad_region=0, passed=7075
Got 7075 stars (including 6520 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7075 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=10.865 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.044 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.531 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.617 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.354 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.419 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=1.146 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.354 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.421 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.419
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.421 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1336 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1212 n_q4=1160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits sigma_overall=0.237 worst_q_ratio=1.365
ref2=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.449
new1=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.167
new2=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.097
reference average sigma_overall=0.2655 worst_q_ratio=1.407
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.21 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139_astrometric_residuals.png (4878 matched stars from wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404_astrometric_residuals.png (4869 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-53-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_035459_TTUQ1b1x1_2182250_EIfCZNyk/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:40:22.71 +09:44:45.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:14:03.94 +12:47:10.5: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:00:54.48 +16:20:10.5: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:15:25.86 +12:20:05.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:12:20.95 +13:11:40.9: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:15:13.55 +10:16:02.4: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:52:16.01 +15:47:07.9: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:15:25.86 +12:20:05.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:15:13.55 +10:16:02.4: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:40:22.71 +09:44:45.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:12:20.95 +13:11:40.9: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:14:03.94 +12:47:10.5: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:52:16.01 +15:47:07.9: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:00:54.48 +16:20:10.5: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:15:13.55 +10:16:02.4: ref_mag=11.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7070 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:12:20.95 +13:11:40.9: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4399 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:14:03.94 +12:47:10.5: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3702 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:52:16.01 +15:47:07.9: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4096 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:00:54.48 +16:20:10.5: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4634 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20165.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20232.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20094_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20094_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20165_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 20165_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20232_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 20232_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20245_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20245_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:10:13.51 +11:31:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20246_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20246_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20250_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20250_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20259_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20259_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20262_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20262_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51701_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51701_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51705_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51705_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51706_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51706_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51711_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51711_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51712_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51712_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51714_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51714_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51715_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51715_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51717_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51717_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51719_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51719_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51722_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51722_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51727_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51727_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51729_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51729_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51734_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51734_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51735_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51735_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51737_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51737_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:45:28.90 +17:08:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51738_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51738_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51739_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51739_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51740_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51740_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51742_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51742_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:03.42 +10:55:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51743_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51743_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51816_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51816_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:15:25.86 +12:20:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51886_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 51886_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:40:22.71 +09:44:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51966_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 51966_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52144_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 52144_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52156_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52156_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:47:13.24 +17:54:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52201_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 52201_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52204_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 52204_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52208_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 52208_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52216_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52216_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:43:50.01 +14:26:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52226_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52226_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:39:44.51 +16:26:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52260_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 52260_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 52353_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52506_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52506_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:56.41 +16:36:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52593_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52593_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52594_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52594_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52595_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52595_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52610_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52610_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52613_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52613_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52617_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52637_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52637_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52655_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52655_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52663_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 52663_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52675_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52675_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52692_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52692_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52728_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52728_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52733_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52733_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52749_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52749_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52750_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52750_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52764_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52764_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52767_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52767_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52768_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52768_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52771_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52771_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52773_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52773_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52776_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52776_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52793_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52793_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52807_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52807_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52813_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52813_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52819_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52819_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52820_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52820_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52832_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52832_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52842_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52842_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52848_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52848_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52850_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52850_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52858_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52861_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52861_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52867_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52867_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52868_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52868_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52872_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52872_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52878_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52878_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52881_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52881_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52882_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52882_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52888_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52888_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52889_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52889_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52900_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52900_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52903_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52903_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52906_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52906_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52910_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52910_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52920_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52920_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52922_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52922_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52925_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52925_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52929_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52929_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52933_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52933_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52936_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52936_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52940_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52940_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52946_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52946_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52947_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52947_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52953_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52953_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52959_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52959_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52968_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52968_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52976_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52976_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52977_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52977_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52980_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52980_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52985_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52985_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52989_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52989_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52991_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52991_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52993_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52993_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52994_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52997_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52997_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52998_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52998_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53004_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53004_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53008_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53008_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53020_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53020_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53021_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53021_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53023_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53023_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53026_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53026_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53041_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53041_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53047_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53047_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53053_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53053_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53066_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53066_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53078_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53078_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53079_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53079_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53097_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53097_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53104_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53104_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50598_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 50598_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29370_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 29370_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-54-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
