This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8595,6.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3595 6.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3595 2461302.8595 8.88 06:54:01.61 +23:03:23.9
192.44174 10.82630 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres -0 -0 0 8.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:54:01.61 +23:03:23.9: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:54:01.61 +23:03:23.9: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8595,8.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3595 8.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3595 2461302.8595 11.05 07:38:16.40 +21:17:01.7
198.38096 19.50023 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe 0 -0 0 11.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:16.40 +21:17:01.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:38:16.40 +21:17:01.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8595,11.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3595 11.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8595,6.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3595 6.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3595 2461302.8595 11.88 07:34:30.71 +22:54:23.0
196.43894 19.30849 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 0 -0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:30.71 +22:54:23.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:34:30.71 +22:54:23.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8595,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3595 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3595 2461302.8595 13.05 07:46:50.88 +23:37:43.7
196.83488 22.20875 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate 0 -1 1 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:46:50.88 +23:37:43.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:46:50.88 +23:37:43.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8595,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3595 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3595 2461302.8595 13.83 07:36:12.57 +23:52:54.3
195.63213 20.03366 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.579 Sidonia 0 1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:12.57 +23:52:54.3: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:36:12.57 +23:52:54.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8595,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3595 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3595 2461302.8595 13.43 07:02:38.54 +21:22:59.7
194.84544 11.93212 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.322 Phaeo -1 3 3 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:38.54 +21:22:59.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:02:38.54 +21:22:59.7: 15.57 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.26
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8595,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3595 13.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461302.85987417 19.09.2026 08:38:03.128 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22155
Objects passed selection criteria: 22078
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17524.8
Average stars matched: 17111.8 (97.6433 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 250708 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 03:42:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461302.85987417 19.09.2026 08:38:03.128 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 201
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 39 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 140436
Objects passed selection criteria: 140020
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 110732
Average stars matched: 106728 (96.3843 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 539620 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 03:44:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.85910520
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:07.191 +21:59:07.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:07.191 +21:59:07.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Image size: 944.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:04.875 +21:59:42.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:04.875 +21:59:42.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0062 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:07.191 +21:59:07.98
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:04.875 +21:59:42.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01303 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RYNQiOfQIH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2h4L5Tf0pm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rtgty4QzmQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tYi6wnGusO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.8 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
2.8 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.RYNQiOfQIH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=1, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=904 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2h4L5Tf0pm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=1, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 21095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=895 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1061 n_q4=1499 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rtgty4QzmQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=612, bad_region=0, passed=11714
Got 11714 stars (including 11086 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11714 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=6.695 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=24.497 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.452 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.198 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.333 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.455 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4799 robust_rms_before=1.324 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.355 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.333 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.479 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.455
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.479 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1602 n_q2=809 n_q3=1575 n_q4=813 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tYi6wnGusO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=632, bad_region=0, passed=11765
Got 11765 stars (including 11125 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11765 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4802 stars left (next iteration limit 5278)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=6.754 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=23.565 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=0.443 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.820 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.519 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4802 robust_rms_before=1.229 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.480 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.519
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.480 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits N_match=4802 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1602 n_q2=815 n_q3=1565 n_q4=820 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.183
ref2=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.299
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.215
reference average sigma_overall=0.4065 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4811 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391_astrometric_residuals.png (4802 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.39 +23:01:31.1: 11.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:54:01.61 +23:03:23.9: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:50.64 +20:58:42.8: 10.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.1: 10.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.80 +22:47:45.2: 10.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:16.40 +21:17:01.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.39 +23:01:31.1: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:50.64 +20:58:42.8: 10.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.1: 10.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.2: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.80 +22:47:45.2: 10.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:54:01.61 +23:03:23.9: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.77 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.39 +23:01:31.1: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2521 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:50.64 +20:58:42.8: ref_mag=10.77 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9580 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.1: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.5706 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.80 +22:47:45.2: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1127 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:38:16.40 +21:17:01.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31368.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31511.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31358_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 31358_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31368_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 31368_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31369_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 31369_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.08 +25:59:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31375_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 31375_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31425_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 31425_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31433_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 31433_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.06 +20:02:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31448_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 31448_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31460_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 31460_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.44 +24:13:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 31469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31478_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 31478_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 31508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.91 +22:56:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 31511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31537_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 31537_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.57 +22:51:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31561_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 31561_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:24.47 +22:16:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21308_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 21308_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:24.54 +17:53:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:54:01.61 +23:03:23.9
07:38:16.40 +21:17:01.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:07.191 +21:59:07.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:07.191 +21:59:07.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Image size: 944.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:04.875 +21:59:42.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:04.875 +21:59:42.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0062 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:07.191 +21:59:07.98
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:04.875 +21:59:42.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01303 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mbgvDtZE6c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nmgxOR8ndx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.phl2RV5hiN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AMaKhke571
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 193 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mbgvDtZE6c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, bad_region=3, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=951 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nmgxOR8ndx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=17785, bad_region=5, passed=153538
Got 153538 stars (including 135488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=940 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1093 n_q4=1447 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.phl2RV5hiN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=4048, bad_region=13, passed=69863
Got 69863 stars (including 65662 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69863 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=6.808 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=23.137 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.208 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=0.334 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.450 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4793 robust_rms_before=1.326 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.346 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.334 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.459 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.450
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.459 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=1570 n_q2=804 n_q3=1580 n_q4=839 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.AMaKhke571 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4170, bad_region=15, passed=71000
Got 71000 stars (including 66714 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71000 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70990 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70990 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70990 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4790 stars left (next iteration limit 5269)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=6.876 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=22.470 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.445 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.826 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.520 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4790 robust_rms_before=1.234 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.347 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.457 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.520
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.457 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits N_match=4790 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1565 n_q2=807 n_q3=1580 n_q4=838 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.298
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0390.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_034015_TTUQ1b1x1_1125303_8ylNOXYV/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:41.59 +19:46:44.2: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:23.27 +23:12:38.0: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:28.65 +23:40:17.6: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:30.71 +18:53:33.6: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:56.46 +22:10:42.5: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:26.66 +23:01:36.4: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:51:22.61 +22:49:03.6: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:51:22.61 +22:49:03.6: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:36:26.66 +23:01:36.4: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:10:30.71 +18:53:33.6: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:53:56.46 +22:10:42.5: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:28.65 +23:40:17.6: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:23.27 +23:12:38.0: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:41.59 +19:46:44.2: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:22.61 +22:49:03.6: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7001 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:30.71 +18:53:33.6: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3998 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:26.66 +23:01:36.4: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7656 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:56.46 +22:10:42.5: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7934 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:23.27 +23:12:38.0: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7507 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:41.59 +19:46:44.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4779 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:28.65 +23:40:17.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5362 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:06.35 +24:26:56.1: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:06.35 +24:26:56.1: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:48.95 +23:58:10.4: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:06.35 +24:26:56.1: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5570 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.94 +20:54:37.9: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:04.80 +19:49:26.1: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:48.70 +21:43:40.9: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:48.95 +23:58:10.4: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:48.95 +23:58:10.4: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4149 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.94 +20:54:37.9: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.94 +20:54:37.9: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1268 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:04.80 +19:49:26.1: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:04.80 +19:49:26.1: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9798 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:48.70 +21:43:40.9: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:48.70 +21:43:40.9: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1822 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:29.95 +27:10:50.8: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:29.95 +27:10:50.8: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:29.95 +27:10:50.8: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6858 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.85 +22:54:53.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:30.71 +22:54:23.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:57.55 +22:31:30.7: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:27.14 +26:25:33.5: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.85 +22:54:53.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.85 +22:54:53.3: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.84 +22:50:50.8: 10.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:34:30.71 +22:54:23.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:57.55 +22:31:30.7: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:57.55 +22:31:30.7: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3896 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:27.14 +26:25:33.5: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:27.14 +26:25:33.5: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4508 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.84 +22:50:50.8: 10.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:25.9: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.73 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.84 +22:50:50.8: ref_mag=10.73 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.4814 delta=-1.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:25.9: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:25.9: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4377 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:37.38 +21:43:08.2: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:35.45 +25:22:47.6: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:37.38 +21:43:08.2: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:37.38 +21:43:08.2: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9247 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:35.45 +25:22:47.6: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:35.45 +25:22:47.6: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0012 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:15.34 +24:11:33.1: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:11.34 +18:48:54.9: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:52.17 +23:32:20.0: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:26.74 +23:15:06.9: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:15.34 +24:11:33.1: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:15.34 +24:11:33.1: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1057 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:11.34 +18:48:54.9: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:11.34 +18:48:54.9: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2850 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:51:06.99 +20:55:06.4: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:53:52.17 +23:32:20.0: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:26.74 +23:15:06.9: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:52.17 +23:32:20.0: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5303 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:26.74 +23:15:06.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4236 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:51:06.99 +20:55:06.4: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:06.99 +20:55:06.4: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4387 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:28.20 +23:00:16.0: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:46:50.88 +23:37:43.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:03:28.20 +23:00:16.0: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:28.20 +23:00:16.0: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4350 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.61 +22:49:43.0: 12.84 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:46:50.88 +23:37:43.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.61 +22:49:43.0: 12.94 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.61 +22:49:43.0: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.4279 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:00.82 +20:13:24.6: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:00.82 +20:13:24.6: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:00.82 +20:13:24.6: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2227 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:05.77 +20:55:32.9: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:00:13.16 +25:45:29.6: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:58.70 +26:08:07.7: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:58:22.14 +22:15:11.0: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:05.77 +20:55:32.9: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:05.77 +20:55:32.9: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6907 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:00:13.16 +25:45:29.6: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:13.16 +25:45:29.6: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7182 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:58:22.14 +22:15:11.0: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:33:58.70 +26:08:07.7: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:22.14 +22:15:11.0: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7816 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:58.70 +26:08:07.7: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6034 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:12.57 +23:52:54.3: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:01.60 +22:59:22.4: 11.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:36:12.57 +23:52:54.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:01.60 +22:59:22.4: 11.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:01.60 +22:59:22.4: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3010 delta=-2.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:38.54 +21:22:59.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:02:38.54 +21:22:59.7: 15.57 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:02:38.54 +21:22:59.7: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=13.4182 delta=2.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175852.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176579.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out177059.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80057.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175435_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175435_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.29 +23:00:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175448_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175448_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175453_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175453_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.15 +21:13:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175455_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175455_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175456_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175456_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:37.57 +23:35:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175457_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175457_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175461_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175461_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175466_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175466_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175467_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175467_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:51.61 +17:33:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175470_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175470_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:50.81 +21:39:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:44.61 +20:07:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:00.39 +23:33:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.30 +19:58:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:32.85 +22:54:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175486_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175486_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:29.65 +22:51:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175487_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175487_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:04.88 +20:58:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:07.69 +18:14:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:42.87 +18:23:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175495_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175495_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:56.65 +22:46:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:56.15 +18:43:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:14.85 +18:59:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:17.91 +22:18:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175502_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175502_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:51.38 +18:23:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175503_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175503_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:34.85 +20:54:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:31.07 +20:09:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:54.04 +20:45:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.62 +17:49:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.89 +26:11:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175513_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175513_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.79 +24:28:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175514_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175514_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.53 +21:02:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:32.97 +24:41:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175516_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175516_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:11.58 +22:11:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175517_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175517_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.20 +19:25:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175518_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175518_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.08 +19:40:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175520_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175520_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:01.29 +25:15:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175521_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175521_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:00.10 +19:41:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175523_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175523_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.74 +21:35:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175524_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175524_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.83 +20:04:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175528_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175528_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.08 +23:55:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175529_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175529_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:27.74 +19:32:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 175531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175539_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175539_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:01.61 +23:03:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175673_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175673_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.91 +22:56:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175683_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175683_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:16.40 +21:17:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175700_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175700_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.57 +22:51:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175756_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175756_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.66 +19:12:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175761_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175761_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.55 +22:52:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175766_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175766_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.22 +24:07:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175767_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175767_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175795_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175795_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.15 +22:38:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175852_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 175852_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175855_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175855_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.38 +22:56:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175857_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175857_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:52.15 +26:07:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175880_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175880_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.73 +25:46:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175889_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175889_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.93 +19:13:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175890_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175890_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175933_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175933_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175953_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175953_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175983_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175983_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:33.03 +22:42:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175984_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175984_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.11 +23:37:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175992_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 175992_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.39 +26:03:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176004_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176004_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.90 +20:58:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176035_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176035_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.55 +25:29:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176038_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176038_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:02.92 +23:25:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176054_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176054_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176059_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176059_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:01.17 +26:51:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176063_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176063_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.35 +25:56:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176069_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176069_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:19.05 +25:55:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176080_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176080_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.99 +23:02:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176099_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176099_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.52 +22:23:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176104_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176104_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.84 +22:57:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176113_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176113_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:36.97 +17:45:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176127_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176127_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.89 +22:42:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176145_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176145_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176161_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176161_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.88 +23:26:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176174_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176174_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176181_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176181_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.51 +21:18:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176193_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176193_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.37 +21:47:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176205_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176205_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.72 +24:40:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176207_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176207_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.15 +22:52:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176220_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176220_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.12 +22:10:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176232_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176232_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.80 +18:51:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176239_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176239_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:19.27 +22:04:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176261_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176261_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.11 +22:43:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176276_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176276_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.73 +23:56:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176293_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176293_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.32 +24:16:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176298_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176298_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.18 +22:57:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176307_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176307_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:21.50 +23:00:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176335_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176335_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.89 +22:49:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176343_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176343_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.39 +23:05:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176379_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176379_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.43 +20:30:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176414_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176414_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.03 +25:18:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176422_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176422_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.30 +24:32:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176426_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176426_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:25.06 +26:03:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:55.98 +27:08:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176457_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176457_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176459_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176459_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.17 +24:08:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.62 +26:19:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176470_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176470_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.31 +21:31:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.52 +21:56:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176495_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176495_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.62 +22:49:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.14 +22:57:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:31.52 +24:54:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176509_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176509_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:16.94 +26:37:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:33.14 +23:13:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.50 +19:28:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176528_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176528_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:16.92 +24:56:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:55.44 +20:35:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176535_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176535_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.69 +20:31:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176537_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176537_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:36.11 +20:45:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.14 +22:50:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176542_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176542_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:22.62 +24:42:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176548_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176548_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176549_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176549_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.31 +18:07:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176563_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176563_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.65 +25:50:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176569_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176569_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:10.33 +23:40:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176579_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 176579_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176582_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176582_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:55.07 +24:28:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176585_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176585_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:30.73 +26:54:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176588_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176588_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.01 +20:06:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176590_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176590_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.15 +22:51:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176591_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176591_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:29.26 +22:51:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176603_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176603_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176605_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176605_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:17.00 +22:39:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176610_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176610_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176613_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176613_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:43.01 +26:00:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176621_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176621_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:06.73 +21:00:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176638_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176638_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:28.62 +19:21:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176659_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176659_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:31.10 +19:14:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176664_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176664_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.03 +20:26:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176672_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176672_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:47.94 +25:23:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176675_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176675_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176689_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176689_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:48.06 +21:24:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176694_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176694_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.73 +21:27:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176718_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176718_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:01.09 +23:54:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176725_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176725_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176728_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176728_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.69 +25:49:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176759_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176759_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.70 +19:56:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176760_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176760_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:45.57 +21:44:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176772_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176772_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.45 +20:05:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176779_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176779_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.54 +20:26:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176783_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176783_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.53 +24:54:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176789_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176789_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:11.91 +22:12:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176795_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176795_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:17.18 +24:22:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176797_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176797_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.10 +22:57:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176811_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176811_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:55.69 +26:26:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176812_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176812_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.08 +21:35:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176822_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176822_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:35.85 +24:19:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176823_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176823_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.61 +20:00:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176856_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176856_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176857_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176857_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.71 +21:21:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176868_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176868_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.94 +22:52:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176870_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176870_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:41.49 +22:55:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176874_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176874_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176895_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176895_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176903_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176903_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176909_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176909_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:49.45 +17:39:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176913_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176913_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:28.55 +23:06:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176926_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176926_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.49 +25:10:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176930_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176930_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.80 +22:50:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176948_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176948_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:28.10 +25:27:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176981_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 176981_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:59.32 +22:48:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177002_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 177002_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:34.91 +22:52:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177034_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 177034_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.65 +23:02:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177037_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 177037_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:33.81 +24:10:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177038_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 177038_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:05.13 +22:57:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177040_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 177040_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:55.86 +23:00:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177059_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 177059_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177065_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 177065_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.48 +24:13:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 05356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:32.75 +26:47:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.40 +26:47:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.07 +25:59:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80057_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
Preparing report for the candidate 80057_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29595_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 29595_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:21.42 +18:06:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.07 +20:02:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148925_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 148925_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:36.50 +17:01:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116684_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 116684_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:24.54 +17:53:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126593_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391
The candidate 126593_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-38-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0391 did not pass the final checks
