This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 11.06 07:38:16.25 +21:17:02.5
198.38051 19.49977 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe 0 0 0 11.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:16.25 +21:17:02.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:38:16.25 +21:17:02.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,11.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 11.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 11.91 07:34:30.58 +22:54:23.8
196.43853 19.30811 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 0 0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:30.58 +22:54:23.8: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:34:30.58 +22:54:23.8: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,11.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 11.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 13.48 07:19:26.20 +18:07:00.6
199.57801 14.17423 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo -1 -0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:26.20 +18:07:00.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:19:26.20 +18:07:00.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3582 2461302.8582 13.82 07:36:12.49 +23:52:54.0
195.63209 20.03335 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.579 Sidonia 0 1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:12.49 +23:52:54.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:36:12.49 +23:52:54.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8582,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3582 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461302.85848149 19.09.2026 08:36:02.801 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17789
Objects passed selection criteria: 17711
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12059.8
Average stars matched: 10939.5 (90.7108 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 242300 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 03:39:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461302.85848149 19.09.2026 08:36:02.801 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 142
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 122619
Objects passed selection criteria: 122254
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 88751.8
Average stars matched: 79701.5 (89.8027 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 574960 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 03:41:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.85793890
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:09.035 +21:59:38.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:09.035 +21:59:38.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:12.174 +21:59:37.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:12.174 +21:59:37.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0327 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:09.035 +21:59:38.11
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:12.174 +21:59:37.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01213 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A5ChidFYeF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4XC1NJhPvf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rbPuUCVd5o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hyOpORSzUV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.A5ChidFYeF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=7924, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 14270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4839 stars left (next iteration limit 5322)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4839 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1308 n_q2=959 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1064 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4XC1NJhPvf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=7854, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 14073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5317)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1295 n_q2=958 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rbPuUCVd5o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=645, bad_region=1249, passed=9844
Got 9844 stars (including 8002 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9844 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=5.742 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.245 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.567 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.580 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.464 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.485 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=1.413 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.493 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.464 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.524 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.485
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.524 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1805 n_q2=670 n_q3=1666 n_q4=638 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hyOpORSzUV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=641, bad_region=1254, passed=9933
Got 9933 stars (including 8090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9933 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4774 stars left (next iteration limit 5254)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=5.771 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.777 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.577 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.609 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.459 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.485 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4774 robust_rms_before=1.358 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.501 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.459 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.540 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.485
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:12.237 +21:59:36.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 9933 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky998055.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.358 -> 0.459 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4774 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4613 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4613 pairs (4774 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4613 robust_rms=5.670 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.646 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4613 robust_rms=0.569 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.600 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4613 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.480 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4613 robust_rms_before=0.455 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.455 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.454 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.478 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.480
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.480 vs 0.478 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4613 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4613 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits N_match=4613 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1733 n_q2=633 n_q3=1622 n_q4=625 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.224
ref2=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.281
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits sigma_overall=0.501 worst_q_ratio=1.100
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits sigma_overall=0.468 worst_q_ratio=1.086
reference average sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.2525
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4839 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4834 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431_astrometric_residuals.png (4613 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.2: 11.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:16.25 +21:17:02.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.78 +22:47:45.2: 10.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:42.9: 10.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.37 +22:51:40.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:42.9: 10.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.37 +22:51:40.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.37 +22:51:40.2: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.2: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.78 +22:47:45.2: 10.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:38:16.25 +21:17:02.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:42.9: ref_mag=10.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.6349 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.78 +22:47:45.2: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1538 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.2: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3400 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33047.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31052_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 31052_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.11 +25:59:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31127_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 31127_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31915_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 31915_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32632_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 32632_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33033_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 33033_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33047_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 33047_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33231_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 33231_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.91 +22:56:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33716_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 33716_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.56 +22:51:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:38:16.25 +21:17:02.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:09.035 +21:59:38.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:09.035 +21:59:38.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:12.237 +21:59:36.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:12.237 +21:59:36.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0330 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:09.035 +21:59:38.11
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:12.237 +21:59:36.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01238 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3BcNAoGAds
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9hHM3KV2Q4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nU0mfxaJOd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits &> /tmp/tmp.On5tZQVPuG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.772750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.772750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 128 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3BcNAoGAds (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, bad_region=41121, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 98315 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1345 n_q2=911 n_q3=1579 n_q4=1018 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9hHM3KV2Q4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=43, blended=17785, bad_region=41723, passed=153562
Got 153562 stars (including 99663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1334 n_q2=911 n_q3=1578 n_q4=1030 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nU0mfxaJOd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4355, bad_region=6650, passed=74311
Got 74311 stars (including 63439 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74311 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4770 stars left (next iteration limit 5247)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=5.746 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.653 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.570 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.583 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.460 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.487 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4770 robust_rms_before=1.426 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.476 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.460 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.534 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.487
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.534 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits N_match=4770 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=1799 n_q2=687 n_q3=1615 n_q4=669 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.On5tZQVPuG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4394, bad_region=6612, passed=73975
Got 73975 stars (including 63115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4813 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4767 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=5.792 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.300 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.575 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.614 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.482 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4767 robust_rms_before=0.460 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.461 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.484 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.482
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.484 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits N_match=4767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=1797 n_q2=689 n_q3=1612 n_q4=669 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-35-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_033732_TTUQ2b1x1_977602_uWNoe083/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:33.95 +25:05:22.7: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:41.45 +19:46:44.3: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:05.69 +23:08:44.2: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:08.81 +20:04:44.4: 14.72 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:29.70 +19:28:18.8: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:53.71 +25:02:27.3: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:27.31 +24:58:51.4: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:39.90 +18:49:29.1: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:28.58 +23:40:17.3: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:08.81 +20:04:44.4: 14.83 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:40:53.71 +25:02:27.3: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:33.95 +25:05:22.7: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:16:29.70 +19:28:18.8: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:05.69 +23:08:44.2: 13.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:41.45 +19:46:44.3: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:22:27.31 +24:58:51.4: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:53.71 +25:02:27.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9525 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:08.81 +20:04:44.4: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1275 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:05.69 +23:08:44.2: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4865 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:41.45 +19:46:44.3: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6942 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:29.70 +19:28:18.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6632 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:33.95 +25:05:22.7: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6200 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:27.31 +24:58:51.4: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2091 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:40:39.90 +18:49:29.1: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:28.58 +23:40:17.3: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:28.58 +23:40:17.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5650 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:39.90 +18:49:29.1: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1438 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:39.19 +21:29:20.0: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:14.95 +18:59:01.3: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.22 +19:41:49.0: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:26.00 +20:54:37.7: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.22 +19:41:49.0: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:14.95 +18:59:01.3: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:18:39.19 +21:29:20.0: 13.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:26.00 +20:54:37.7: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:14.95 +18:59:01.3: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8817 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.22 +19:41:49.0: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7419 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:39.19 +21:29:20.0: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3217 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:26.00 +20:54:37.7: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1415 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:30.58 +22:54:23.8: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:51.0: 10.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.6: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.10 +19:24:26.5: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:34:30.58 +22:54:23.8: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:51.0: 10.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:40.15 +23:05:33.2: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.81 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:51.0: ref_mag=10.81 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.5592 delta=-1.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:46.74 +23:15:29.4: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.10 +19:24:26.5: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.10 +19:24:26.5: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4611 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:41:40.15 +23:05:33.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:40.15 +23:05:33.2: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4876 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:40:46.74 +23:15:29.4: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:46.74 +23:15:29.4: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5663 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.64 +22:49:42.8: 12.90 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:01.03 +20:13:25.4: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.64 +22:49:42.8: 12.98 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.29 +22:51:11.5: 13.71 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.64 +22:49:42.8: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.4349 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:43.90 +18:19:29.6: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:01.03 +20:13:25.4: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:01.03 +20:13:25.4: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3078 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.29 +22:51:11.5: 13.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:04.11 +18:36:02.9: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.29 +22:51:11.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=13.5214 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:26.20 +18:07:00.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:33:43.90 +18:19:29.6: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:43.90 +18:19:29.6: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2652 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:28.63 +19:21:20.8: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:30:04.11 +18:36:02.9: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:19:26.20 +18:07:00.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:04.11 +18:36:02.9: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2053 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:27.85 +24:22:23.6: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:28.63 +19:21:20.8: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:28.63 +19:21:20.8: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5248 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:01.39 +20:28:59.3: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:31:27.85 +24:22:23.6: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:27.85 +24:22:23.6: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6219 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:22.01 +25:44:36.7: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:58.59 +26:08:07.4: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:01.39 +20:28:59.3: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:01.39 +20:28:59.3: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6404 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:24:22.01 +25:44:36.7: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:22.01 +25:44:36.7: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7019 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:38.09 +19:51:29.9: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:33:58.59 +26:08:07.4: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:01.63 +22:59:22.1: 11.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:58.59 +26:08:07.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5451 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:36:12.49 +23:52:54.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:15:38.09 +19:51:29.9: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:38.09 +19:51:29.9: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8996 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:01.63 +22:59:22.1: 11.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:01.63 +22:59:22.1: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1003 delta=-2.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:23.43 +25:40:32.4: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:08.29 +22:46:26.6: 13.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:41.37 +22:55:55.1: 13.59 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:36:12.49 +23:52:54.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:31:23.43 +25:40:32.4: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:08.29 +22:46:26.6: 13.66 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:23.43 +25:40:32.4: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7274 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:08.29 +22:46:26.6: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=14.1165 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:41.37 +22:55:55.1: 13.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:41.37 +22:55:55.1: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=14.0405 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:16.22 +23:55:45.1: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:43.38 +23:28:23.1: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:16.22 +23:55:45.1: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:00.69 +23:01:53.8: 13.11 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:16.22 +23:55:45.1: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8203 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:16:43.38 +23:28:23.1: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:43.38 +23:28:23.1: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9777 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:00.69 +23:01:53.8: 13.08 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:00.69 +23:01:53.8: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.2982 delta=-1.20 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176368.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out187961.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192382.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171763_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171763_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171767_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171767_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171768_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171768_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171777_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171777_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.22 +23:00:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171781_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171781_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:06.20 +25:56:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171784_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171784_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171785_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171785_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171788_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171788_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:45.55 +17:55:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171792_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171792_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171795_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171795_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171796_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171796_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171799_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171799_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:22.51 +24:00:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171806_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171806_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:50.58 +21:18:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171809_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171809_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.29 +19:58:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171811_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171811_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171816_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171816_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171818_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171818_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171819_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171819_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171820_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171820_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.67 +24:28:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171821_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171821_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:32.93 +24:41:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171822_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171822_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:45.94 +20:57:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171823_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 171823_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.21 +19:25:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173946_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 173946_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:16.24 +21:17:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174156_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 174156_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174606_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 174606_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.55 +22:51:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175700_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 175700_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175731_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 175731_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.21 +24:07:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175963_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 175963_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.15 +22:38:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175976_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 175976_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.55 +22:52:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176368_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 176368_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177069_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 177069_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.38 +22:56:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178400_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 178400_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.89 +23:02:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178514_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 178514_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178949_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 178949_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.33 +25:56:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179155_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 179155_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:56.31 +24:55:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179405_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 179405_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179575_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 179575_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.92 +22:42:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179709_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 179709_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.81 +22:57:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179940_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 179940_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180416_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 180416_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.10 +22:10:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180467_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 180467_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180612_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 180612_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.46 +21:18:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181273_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 181273_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.40 +18:39:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181442_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 181442_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.76 +23:56:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181502_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 181502_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.31 +21:47:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182149_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 182149_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:45.74 +23:15:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 182521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.80 +18:51:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182912_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 182912_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.10 +22:57:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182918_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 182918_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.50 +20:30:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182975_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 182975_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.10 +22:52:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183416_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 183416_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.11 +22:43:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183621_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 183621_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.36 +21:31:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183824_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 183824_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:20.31 +24:26:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184008_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 184008_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:15.38 +24:11:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184087_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 184087_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.44 +19:28:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184831_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 184831_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.31 +24:32:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185151_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 185151_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.14 +22:57:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185189_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 185189_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:36.56 +19:19:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185340_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 185340_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.99 +20:06:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185503_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 185503_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185624_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 185624_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:26.81 +19:37:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185641_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 185641_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.88 +22:49:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185699_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 185699_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.65 +20:31:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185989_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 185989_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.55 +24:54:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186086_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 186086_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186657_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 186657_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.64 +21:27:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186699_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 186699_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.07 +22:50:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186741_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 186741_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:17.06 +24:22:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186769_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 186769_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186978_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 186978_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.40 +20:05:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187218_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 187218_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.56 +19:03:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187381_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 187381_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.15 +24:08:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187497_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 187497_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:40.98 +22:08:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 187633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.58 +22:49:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187695_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 187695_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187706_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 187706_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:17.05 +22:39:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187961_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 187961_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188033_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 188033_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:01.03 +23:54:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188097_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 188097_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188171_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 188171_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.64 +20:00:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188374_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 188374_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:26.53 +21:00:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188600_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 188600_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188630_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 188630_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.78 +22:50:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189251_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 189251_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.23 +22:57:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189509_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 189509_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:48.16 +25:23:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189516_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 189516_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189564_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 189564_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.61 +21:21:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189616_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 189616_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:43.09 +26:00:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189762_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 189762_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.11 +22:51:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189803_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 189803_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:51.63 +24:24:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189842_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 189842_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189844_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 189844_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189985_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 189985_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.65 +19:56:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190198_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 190198_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:38.78 +24:17:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190776_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 190776_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191263_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 191263_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:18.93 +18:19:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191817_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 191817_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:59.38 +22:48:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191854_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 191854_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.67 +20:49:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191871_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 191871_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191966_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 191966_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.61 +19:09:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191994_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 191994_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192142_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 192142_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.57 +25:10:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192251_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 192251_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.58 +20:16:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192382_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 192382_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192470_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 192470_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192552_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 192552_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192655_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 192655_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 192802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:22.88 +18:10:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192915_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 192915_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:55.80 +23:00:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193007_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 193007_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.75 +20:49:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193921_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 193921_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:59.93 +20:18:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194076_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 194076_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194087_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 194087_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194105_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 194105_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:58.64 +23:31:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194411_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 194411_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.69 +22:51:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194419_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 194419_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194532_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 194532_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.04 +21:35:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194548_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 194548_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:08.38 +23:02:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194641_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 194641_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.75 +22:47:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194866_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 194866_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:50.51 +22:57:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194977_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 194977_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:22.88 +19:59:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195162_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 195162_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:50.17 +19:50:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195189_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 195189_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:34.90 +22:52:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195256_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 195256_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:30.67 +22:58:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:21.43 +18:06:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 163170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.69 +24:13:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_03-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0431 did not pass the final checks
