This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 04 13 34.08 +21 01 41.3 7.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,7.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 7.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 04 13 34.09 +21 01 41.5 7.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,7.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 7.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3557 2461302.8557 12.50 03:40:43.75 +21:20:56.0
167.43850 -26.54318 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -0 1 12.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:43.75 +21:20:56.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:43.75 +21:20:56.0: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 03 40 43.75 +21 20 56.0 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,12.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 12.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3557 2461302.8557 12.86 03:30:41.55 +18:28:00.0
167.61278 -30.26446 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.72 Feronia -0 -0 0 12.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:41.55 +18:28:00.0: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:41.55 +18:28:00.0: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 03 30 41.55 +18 28 00.0 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,12.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 12.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3557 2461302.8557 13.29 04:05:02.63 +17:55:16.2
174.63365 -24.95402 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -0 -1 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:02.63 +17:55:16.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:02.63 +17:55:16.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 04 05 02.63 +17 55 16.2 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3557 2461302.8557 13.34 04:09:14.38 +22:45:27.9
171.53660 -20.92538 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix 0 -0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:14.38 +22:45:27.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:14.38 +22:45:27.9: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 04 09 14.38 +22 45 27.9 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3557 2461302.8557 13.64 03:09:16.82 +25:26:52.6
158.22136 -27.81899 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.188 Menippe -0 -1 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:09:16.82 +25:26:52.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:09:16.82 +25:26:52.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 03 09 16.82 +25 26 52.6 13.6 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3557 2461302.8557 14.06 03:12:30.76 +22:06:03.8
161.13434 -30.11134 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.514 Armida -0 -0 0 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:12:30.76 +22:06:03.8: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:12:30.76 +22:06:03.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 03 12 30.76 +22 06 03.8 14.1 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3557 2461302.8557 14.24 03:50:21.89 +17:07:11.2
172.57457 -28.03520 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala 0 -1 1 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:21.89 +17:07:11.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:21.89 +17:07:11.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 03 50 21.89 +17 07 11.2 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,14.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 14.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3557 2461302.8557 14.28 03:28:30.02 +23:08:01.8
163.73096 -27.03234 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.830 Petropolitana -0 -0 0 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:30.02 +23:08:01.8: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:30.02 +23:08:01.8: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 03 28 30.02 +23 08 01.8 14.3 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3557 2461302.8557 14.44 03:28:16.31 +19:15:41.0
166.51041 -30.03885 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -1 -1 1 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:16.31 +19:15:41.0: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:16.31 +19:15:41.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 03 28 16.31 +19 15 41.0 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,14.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 14.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3557 2461302.8557 14.56 03:48:12.25 +21:47:05.8
168.53049 -25.04522 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.859 Bouzareah 0 -1 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:12.25 +21:47:05.8: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:12.25 +21:47:05.8: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 03 48 12.25 +21 47 05.8 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 14.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3557 2461302.8557 14.59 03:40:50.25 +26:49:26.0
163.49394 -22.40829 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.613 Ginevra -1 -0 1 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:50.25 +26:49:26.0: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:50.25 +26:49:26.0: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 03 40 50.25 +26 49 26.0 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3557 2461302.8557 14.65 03:19:00.94 +23:11:34.9
161.75758 -28.33717 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.640 Brambilla 0 -0 0 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:19:00.94 +23:11:34.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:19:00.94 +23:11:34.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 03 19 00.94 +23 11 34.9 14.7 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,14.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 14.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.3557 2461302.8557 15.14 03:45:01.11 +23:51:55.1
166.38839 -24.01126 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.228 Agathe 0 0 0 15.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:01.11 +23:51:55.1: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:01.11 +23:51:55.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 19.3557* 03 45 01.11 +23 51 55.1 15.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461302.8557,15.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260919.3557 15.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461302.85595242 19.09.2026 08:32:24.289 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11773
Objects passed selection criteria: 11767
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11226.5
Average stars matched: 10902.5 (97.114 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236908 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 03:40:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461302.85595242 19.09.2026 08:32:24.289 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 124
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.10
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 68787
Objects passed selection criteria: 68633
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 64635
Average stars matched: 62563 (96.7943 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 496668 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 19 03:41:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.85535286
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:41.656 +21:59:34.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:41.656 +21:59:34.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0328 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:39.202 +21:59:41.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:39.202 +21:59:41.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0231 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:41.656 +21:59:34.08
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:39.202 +21:59:41.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00973 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HDUYIryptV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PDyqJoaBSb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K7lhkJpZwW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YLCnNgTotn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.HDUYIryptV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=0, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 10422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1548 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1071 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PDyqJoaBSb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=0, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 10408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1546 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1073 n_q4=1081 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.K7lhkJpZwW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=630, bad_region=0, passed=11248
Got 11248 stars (including 10608 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11248 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=9.354 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.462 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.312 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.320 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.290 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4919 robust_rms_before=1.306 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.324 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.290
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:41.681 +21:59:32.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11248 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky999300.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.306 -> 0.252 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4919 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4740 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4740 pairs (4919 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4740 robust_rms=9.175 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4740 robust_rms=0.310 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.316 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4740 robust_rms=0.251 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.289 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4740 robust_rms_before=0.251 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.251 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.251 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.288 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.289
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.289 vs 0.288 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4740 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4740 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits N_match=4740 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1067 n_q2=1000 n_q3=1205 n_q4=1468 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YLCnNgTotn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=628, bad_region=0, passed=11258
Got 11258 stars (including 10617 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=9.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.718 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.332 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.338 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.288 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4918 robust_rms_before=1.303 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.286 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.327 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.288
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:39.226 +21:59:40.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11258 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky999309.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.303 -> 0.255 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4918 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4732 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4732 pairs (4918 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4732 robust_rms=9.146 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.513 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4732 robust_rms=0.329 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4732 robust_rms=0.254 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.282 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4732 robust_rms_before=0.253 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.253 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.254 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.284 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.282
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:39.226 +21:59:40.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11258 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1000088.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.253 -> 0.254 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits N_match=4732 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=1064 n_q2=1000 n_q3=1204 n_q4=1464 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.338
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.214
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits sigma_overall=0.267 worst_q_ratio=1.189
reference average sigma_overall=0.3005 worst_q_ratio=1.308
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384_astrometric_residuals.png (4740 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.20 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385_astrometric_residuals.png (4732 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.21 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:55.07 +23:27:15.9: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.9: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:27.96 +20:05:27.5: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:02.84 +21:42:45.1: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:54.02 +22:37:07.6: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:20.45 +20:11:23.7: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:34.29 +17:48:02.9: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:27.96 +20:05:27.5: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:55.07 +23:27:15.9: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.9: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.9: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:27.96 +20:05:27.5: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3302 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:55.07 +23:27:15.9: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4221 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.9: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3903 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.9: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4002 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:02.84 +21:42:45.1: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:54.02 +22:37:07.6: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:02.84 +21:42:45.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4506 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:20.45 +20:11:23.7: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:34.29 +17:48:02.9: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:54.02 +22:37:07.6: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4618 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:20.45 +20:11:23.7: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4834 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:34.29 +17:48:02.9: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4903 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20584_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 20584_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20630_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20630_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:09.79 +24:29:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20647_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20647_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.60 +24:42:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20718_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20718_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:05.51 +18:34:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20725_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20725_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:00.83 +21:22:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20732_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20732_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20744_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20744_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20746_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20746_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20756_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20756_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20757_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20757_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:21.07 +18:01:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20762_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20762_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20765_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20765_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20776_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20776_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:40.86 +23:09:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 20786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:41.681 +21:59:32.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:41.681 +21:59:32.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0329 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:39.226 +21:59:40.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:39.226 +21:59:40.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0232 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:41.681 +21:59:32.60
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:39.226 +21:59:40.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00973 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mevJT66Mt6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1fT6iyQKrh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u0N3U88Okq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B4j4dpQKYk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 71492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6157 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4359 out of 5185 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5185 out of 71492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 118 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mevJT66Mt6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4312, bad_region=7, passed=71155
Got 71155 stars (including 66715 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4932 stars left (next iteration limit 5425)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.223 n_q1=1490 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1113 n_q4=1106 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1fT6iyQKrh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4374, bad_region=8, passed=71475
Got 71475 stars (including 66975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71475 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4928 stars left (next iteration limit 5420)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1490 n_q2=1228 n_q3=1108 n_q4=1102 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.318
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.u0N3U88Okq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2982, bad_region=36, passed=58607
Got 58607 stars (including 55502 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58607 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4923 robust_rms=9.474 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.642 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4923 robust_rms=0.319 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.332 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4923 robust_rms=0.249 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.298 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4923 robust_rms_before=0.250 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.264 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.249 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.296 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.298
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.296 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=1119 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1271 n_q4=1487 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.B4j4dpQKYk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=3032, bad_region=41, passed=58914
Got 58914 stars (including 55754 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58914 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4923 robust_rms=9.508 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.894 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4923 robust_rms=0.337 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.346 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4923 robust_rms=0.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.284 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4923 robust_rms_before=0.253 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.272 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.282 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.284
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.282 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1116 n_q2=1043 n_q3=1270 n_q4=1494 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0384.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_033414_TTUQ1b1x1_868934_M63YHaTk/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:08:41.02 +24:47:43.7: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:58:00.74 +22:59:31.4: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:46.48 +22:43:43.3: 14.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:53:42.36 +23:40:06.8: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:48.98 +26:02:55.6: 14.75 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:55.97 +18:01:15.3: 14.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:10:33.56 +19:22:06.9: 14.76 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:42.25 +23:16:58.2: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:36.16 +26:18:03.8: 14.54 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:15:18.82 +26:22:55.8: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:08:41.02 +24:47:43.7: 15.50 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:48.98 +26:02:55.6: 14.75 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:10:33.56 +19:22:06.9: 14.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:36.16 +26:18:03.8: 14.52 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:46.48 +22:43:43.3: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:53:42.36 +23:40:06.8: 15.20 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:55.97 +18:01:15.3: 14.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:08:41.02 +24:47:43.7: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=15.0508 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:58:00.74 +22:59:31.4: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:42.25 +23:16:58.2: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:48.98 +26:02:55.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7441 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:36.16 +26:18:03.8: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6620 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:33.56 +19:22:06.9: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5770 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:46.48 +22:43:43.3: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4811 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:55.97 +18:01:15.3: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6636 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:42.36 +23:40:06.8: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9625 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:00.74 +22:59:31.4: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5241 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:42.25 +23:16:58.2: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5075 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:15:18.82 +26:22:55.8: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:18.82 +26:22:55.8: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4777 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:26.43 +22:20:37.7: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:30.07 +24:28:11.7: 14.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:07:41.25 +19:35:19.2: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:10:03.95 +24:18:49.0: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:38:45.59 +17:44:10.4: 14.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:34.16 +27:09:55.7: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:15:33.54 +26:04:48.6: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:26.43 +22:20:37.7: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:30.07 +24:28:11.7: 14.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:38:45.59 +17:44:10.4: 14.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:15:33.54 +26:04:48.6: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:26.43 +22:20:37.7: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.3918 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:07:41.25 +19:35:19.2: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:30.07 +24:28:11.7: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5111 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:45.59 +17:44:10.4: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3362 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:34.16 +27:09:55.7: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:33.54 +26:04:48.6: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3310 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:41.25 +19:35:19.2: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2418 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:10:03.95 +24:18:49.0: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:34.16 +27:09:55.7: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1161 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:03.95 +24:18:49.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7833 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:54.43 +23:50:01.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:10:20.38 +26:05:52.8: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:54.43 +23:50:01.2: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:54.43 +23:50:01.2: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3620 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:16:45.21 +26:22:07.0: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:41.55 +18:28:00.0: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:16:44.86 +26:19:53.0: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:43.75 +21:20:56.0: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:10:20.38 +26:05:52.8: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:20.38 +26:05:52.8: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4969 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:36:51.45 +23:11:59.3: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:24.24 +22:45:54.9: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:16:45.21 +26:22:07.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:45.21 +26:22:07.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:41.55 +18:28:00.0: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:16:44.86 +26:19:53.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:44.86 +26:19:53.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:43.75 +21:20:56.0: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:50.28 +24:29:29.2: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:36:51.45 +23:11:59.3: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:36:51.45 +23:11:59.3: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3440 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:24.24 +22:45:54.9: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:24.24 +22:45:54.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2844 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:02.63 +17:55:16.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:50.28 +24:29:29.2: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:50.28 +24:29:29.2: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3432 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:14.38 +22:45:27.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:09:16.82 +25:26:52.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:02.63 +17:55:16.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:14.38 +22:45:27.9: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:09:16.82 +25:26:52.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:17:57.82 +21:36:15.8: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:12:30.76 +22:06:03.8: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:15.05 +24:34:48.6: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:41:16.02 +26:35:48.2: 14.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:17:57.82 +21:36:15.8: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:12:30.76 +22:06:03.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:57.82 +21:36:15.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8977 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:01.01 +24:42:46.3: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:15.05 +24:34:48.6: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:15.05 +24:34:48.6: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8850 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:41:16.02 +26:35:48.2: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:16.02 +26:35:48.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1549 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:01.01 +24:42:46.3: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:01.01 +24:42:46.3: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9598 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:17:11.71 +19:18:46.2: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:49.33 +25:53:23.3: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:17:37.24 +24:35:15.7: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:17:11.71 +19:18:46.2: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:11.71 +19:18:46.2: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1258 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:49.33 +25:53:23.3: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:49.33 +25:53:23.3: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1896 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:17:37.24 +24:35:15.7: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:37.24 +24:35:15.7: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2271 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:43.18 +25:03:03.3: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:23.97 +19:48:43.8: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:07.17 +21:12:57.1: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:43.18 +25:03:03.3: 14.52 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:43.18 +25:03:03.3: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3624 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:21.89 +17:07:11.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:23.97 +19:48:43.8: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:23.97 +19:48:43.8: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2612 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:07.17 +21:12:57.1: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:07.17 +21:12:57.1: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2448 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:21.89 +17:07:11.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:30.02 +23:08:01.8: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:59:46.34 +26:26:03.6: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:58:41.83 +23:51:21.4: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:30.02 +23:08:01.8: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:59:46.34 +26:26:03.6: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:46.34 +26:26:03.6: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3178 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:58:41.83 +23:51:21.4: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:41.83 +23:51:21.4: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3265 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:54.05 +23:52:37.6: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:16.31 +19:15:41.0: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:54.05 +23:52:37.6: 14.33 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:54.05 +23:52:37.6: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4410 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:16.31 +19:15:41.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:12.25 +21:47:05.8: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:12.25 +21:47:05.8: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:18:19.69 +24:34:21.0: 14.68 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:18:19.69 +24:34:21.0: 14.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:19.69 +24:34:21.0: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3632 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:50.25 +26:49:26.0: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:18:51.62 +21:22:29.2: 15.04 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:14:26.05 +20:20:57.9: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:18.92 +24:24:41.6: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:50.25 +26:49:26.0: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:18:51.62 +21:22:29.2: 14.88 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:14:26.05 +20:20:57.9: 14.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:18.92 +24:24:41.6: 14.66 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:26.05 +20:20:57.9: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7199 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:51.62 +21:22:29.2: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7676 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:18.92 +24:24:41.6: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6149 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:19:00.94 +23:11:34.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:10:36.87 +24:51:33.2: 15.61 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:29.51 +25:34:20.1: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:16:20.86 +18:09:31.4: 14.80 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:09:17.35 +21:14:43.7: 14.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:53.07 +20:23:30.6: 15.13 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:29.04 +24:43:07.0: 15.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:11:41.71 +22:14:18.7: 15.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:09:37.62 +23:35:14.7: 15.19 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:29.51 +25:34:20.1: 14.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:19:00.94 +23:11:34.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:10:36.87 +24:51:33.2: 15.23 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:29.51 +25:34:20.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8093 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:09:17.35 +21:14:43.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:36.87 +24:51:33.2: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9412 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:17.35 +21:14:43.7: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9173 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:11:41.71 +22:14:18.7: 15.18 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:16:20.86 +18:09:31.4: 15.09 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:29.04 +24:43:07.0: 15.27 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:09:37.62 +23:35:14.7: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:53.07 +20:23:30.6: 15.11 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:41.71 +22:14:18.7: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9027 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:20.86 +18:09:31.4: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6546 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:29.04 +24:43:07.0: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9948 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:37.62 +23:35:14.7: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9791 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:53.07 +20:23:30.6: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9556 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:10:40.47 +19:02:31.5: 15.36 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:10:00.23 +18:37:32.7: 15.19 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:05.62 +23:45:25.7: 15.19 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:09:28.21 +26:25:27.0: 15.29 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:00:55.63 +25:09:59.0: 15.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:19:24.95 +19:28:56.6: 15.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:12:08.03 +24:07:39.4: 15.47 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:22.95 +26:31:59.2: 15.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:10:40.47 +19:02:31.5: 15.28 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:00:55.63 +25:09:59.0: 15.23 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:09:28.21 +26:25:27.0: 15.25 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:40.47 +19:02:31.5: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8256 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:55.63 +25:09:59.0: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9221 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:28.21 +26:25:27.0: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0639 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:05.62 +23:45:25.7: 15.43 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:12:08.03 +24:07:39.4: 15.21 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:10:00.23 +18:37:32.7: 15.28 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:19:24.95 +19:28:56.6: 15.16 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:22.95 +26:31:59.2: 15.65 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:00.23 +18:37:32.7: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9768 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:08.03 +24:07:39.4: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9788 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:05.62 +23:45:25.7: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8379 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:19:24.95 +19:28:56.6: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1147 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:22.95 +26:31:59.2: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0212 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:15:07.05 +25:02:55.1: 15.05 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:22:34.97 +20:47:24.2: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:20:25.82 +22:23:40.3: 15.61 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:22:15.74 +24:10:36.7: 15.44 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:53.72 +22:55:28.5: 15.11 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:20:55.48 +23:11:17.6: 15.33 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:12:17.50 +20:48:59.7: 15.10 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:12:41.64 +19:26:21.5: 15.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:20:55.48 +23:11:17.6: 15.65 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:22:15.74 +24:10:36.7: 15.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:12:17.50 +20:48:59.7: 15.31 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:22:34.97 +20:47:24.2: 15.55 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:20:25.82 +22:23:40.3: 15.62 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:53.72 +22:55:28.5: 15.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:15:07.05 +25:02:55.1: 15.33 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.62 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:17.50 +20:48:59.7: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8451 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:34.97 +20:47:24.2: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0681 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:55.48 +23:11:17.6: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0786 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:15.74 +24:10:36.7: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1213 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:25.82 +22:23:40.3: ref_mag=15.62 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1208 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:53.72 +22:55:28.5: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9249 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:07.05 +25:02:55.1: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0980 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:12:41.64 +19:26:21.5: 15.45 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:41.64 +19:26:21.5: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9895 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:20:56.32 +23:22:33.7: 15.47 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:59.30 +20:40:12.4: 15.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:52.99 +25:28:02.7: 15.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:15:14.62 +20:35:01.8: 15.55 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:23.76 +23:37:16.4: 16.11 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:18:56.86 +20:04:49.5: 15.42 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:10:40.63 +18:39:23.3: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:00.69 +22:25:24.7: 15.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:23.76 +23:37:16.4: 15.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.65 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:18:56.86 +20:04:49.5: 15.51 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:20:56.32 +23:22:33.7: 15.10 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:59.30 +20:40:12.4: 15.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:10:40.63 +18:39:23.3: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:23.76 +23:37:16.4: ref_mag=15.65 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1726 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:15:14.62 +20:35:01.8: 15.41 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:52.99 +25:28:02.7: 15.36 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:56.32 +23:22:33.7: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8791 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:59.30 +20:40:12.4: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9900 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:56.86 +20:04:49.5: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9869 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:40.63 +18:39:23.3: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9407 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:14.62 +20:35:01.8: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1491 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:52.99 +25:28:02.7: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1113 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:00.69 +22:25:24.7: 15.62 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:00.69 +22:25:24.7: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1756 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:07.08 +22:36:37.0: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:58.60 +21:22:01.3: 15.24 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:01.11 +23:51:55.1: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:05.66 +19:14:14.8: 15.60 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:54.44 +23:21:17.3: 14.96 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:07.08 +22:36:37.0: 14.88 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:07.08 +22:36:37.0: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8611 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:58.60 +21:22:01.3: 15.13 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:54.44 +23:21:17.3: 15.04 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:01.11 +23:51:55.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:05.66 +19:14:14.8: 15.41 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.49 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:05.66 +19:14:14.8: ref_mag=15.49 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0339 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:58.60 +21:22:01.3: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0526 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:54.44 +23:21:17.3: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9707 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87137.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87213.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87360.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87365.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87386.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87532.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87733.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87747.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87876.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87890.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87940.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87979.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88377.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86907_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86907_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86910_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86910_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86916_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86916_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86918_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86918_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86919_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86919_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86920_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86920_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86921_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86921_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86923_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86923_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86925_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86925_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86926_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86926_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86927_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86927_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86929_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86929_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86931_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86931_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86932_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86932_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86934_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86934_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86937_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86937_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86940_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86940_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:56.84 +25:06:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86941_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86941_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:54.56 +18:15:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86944_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86944_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86946_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86946_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86949_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 86949_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86996_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 86996_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:09.79 +24:29:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87016_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87016_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.60 +24:42:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87036_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87036_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:23.17 +24:32:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87114_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87114_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87115_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87115_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87120_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87120_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87137_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 87137_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87185_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87185_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87213_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 87213_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87261_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87261_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:02.55 +24:51:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87281_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87281_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:43.00 +18:12:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87303_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87303_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:22.95 +26:10:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87309_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87309_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87310_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87310_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:56.19 +23:09:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87314_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87314_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87328_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87328_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:12.53 +26:35:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87335_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87335_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87358_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87358_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:11.46 +25:53:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87360_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 87360_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87365_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 87365_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87379_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87379_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:18:15.28 +24:03:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87386_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 87386_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87387_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87387_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:23.78 +18:13:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87399_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87399_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:42.11 +26:21:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87406_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87406_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:22:37.42 +24:53:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87478_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87478_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:20.67 +24:45:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87483_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87483_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:28.02 +23:53:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87528_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87528_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87532_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 87532_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87543_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87543_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:52.24 +18:47:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87553_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87553_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87579_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87579_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:52.52 +25:19:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87603_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87603_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87640_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87640_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87658_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87658_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87671_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87671_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87676_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87676_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87680_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87680_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:18.11 +26:26:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87723_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87723_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87724_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87724_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87725_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87725_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87733_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 87733_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87735_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87735_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:26:47.07 +23:41:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87747_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 87747_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87783_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87783_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87798_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87798_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87812_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87812_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87876_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 87876_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87890_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 87890_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87902_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87902_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87940_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 87940_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87960_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87960_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87968_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87968_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87977_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 87977_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87979_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 87979_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88034_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88034_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88056_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88056_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88063_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88063_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88072_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88072_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88086_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88086_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88094_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88094_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88097_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88097_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88108_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88108_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88110_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88110_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88112_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88112_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88135_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88135_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88141_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88141_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88164_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88164_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88181_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88181_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88187_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88187_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88201_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88201_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88209_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88209_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88219_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88219_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88236_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88236_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88240_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88240_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88241_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88241_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88244_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88244_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88256_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88256_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88259_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88259_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88271_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88271_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88276_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88276_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88280_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88280_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88281_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88281_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88303_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88303_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88305_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88305_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88308_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88308_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88310_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88310_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88331_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88331_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88335_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88335_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88345_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88345_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88377_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
Preparing report for the candidate 88377_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88378_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88378_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88403_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 88403_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55322_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 55322_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:05.51 +18:34:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 08199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:34.40 +26:16:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62441_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 62441_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49116_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385
The candidate 49116_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_03-32-24_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0385 did not pass the final checks
