fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 19.29750 | 2461302.79750 | 14.58 | 13:05:36.13 +73:57:56.2 | 7268 1143 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.29819 | 2461302.79819 | 14.58 | 13:05:34.80 +73:57:50.9 | 7269 1143 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2978 2461302.7978 14.58 13:05:35.47 +73:57:53.6
121.59349 43.12656 galactic UMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.6" and 1.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:05:35.47 +73:57:53.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:05:35.47 +73:57:53.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:05:35.47 +73:57:53.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cam-05-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cam-05-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing Cam-05-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 295430 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 295430 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
renamed 'Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 575.4353 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 517.8945 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1235.7260 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 456.7564 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1234.5583 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 457.2340 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.14746 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T02:08:13.9228728' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T07:08:13.9228728' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.2973833564 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T07:08:23.8237985' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.2974979514 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.995914712548 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.5000378651956 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.115 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 0.719444444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.75772898350163 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 56.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 10.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/d_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits :) Spent 0.703474 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/d_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T02:09:13.6649585' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T07:09:13.6649585' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.298074815 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T07:09:23.5672022' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.2981894328 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.995914692956 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.5000379452737 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.1177777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 0.778333333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.75738820198339 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 56.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 10.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/d_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits :) Spent 0.650615 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/d_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.79749910 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits Image size: 937.0'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:01:06.201 +77:32:09.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 12:01:06.201 +77:32:09.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0705 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Image size: 937.0'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:01:03.844 +77:32:07.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 12:01:03.844 +77:32:07.49 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0684 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:01:06.201 +77:32:09.73 Second-epoch second image center 12:01:03.844 +77:32:07.49 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00221 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Oyh695b4Nm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.guf8p0u245 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4PPT3rOskX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XhXxn70jhk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.856250 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.856250 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec +70.5552 to +82.7628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec 70.5552 to 82.7628 deg Loaded 10553 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3846 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3846 out of 9444 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=6.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 2.3 pix Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 15.3 mag. Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.Oyh695b4Nm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=2248, passed=8935 Got 8935 stars (including 6153 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7122 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7122 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7122 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1387 n_q2=891 n_q3=1706 n_q4=923 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.275 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.guf8p0u245 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, bad_region=2150, passed=9444 Got 9444 stars (including 6846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7750 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7750 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7750 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5392) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1425 n_q2=914 n_q3=1671 n_q4=893 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.4PPT3rOskX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=337, bad_region=1441, passed=6298 Got 6298 stars (including 4592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6298 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4510 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4509 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4509 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4509 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5143 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4510 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4510 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5143 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4510 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5143 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4510 stars left (next iteration limit 4959) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4510 robust_rms=6.932 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.219 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4510 robust_rms=0.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.463 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4510 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.373 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4510 robust_rms_before=0.809 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.348 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.369 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.373 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.369 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits N_match=4510 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1282 n_q2=796 n_q3=1597 n_q4=835 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.035 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.XhXxn70jhk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=349, bad_region=1445, passed=6284 Got 6284 stars (including 4561 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6284 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4481 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4481 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4481 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4481 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5121 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4481 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4481 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5121 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4481 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5121 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4481 stars left (next iteration limit 4929) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4481 robust_rms=6.894 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.211 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4481 robust_rms=0.453 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.545 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4481 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.384 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4481 robust_rms_before=0.827 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.370 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.373 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.384 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.373 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits N_match=4481 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=1274 n_q2=789 n_q3=1572 n_q4=846 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.044 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.275 ref2=Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.062 new1=fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.035 new2=fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.044 reference average sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.1685 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (4903 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340_astrometric_residuals.png (4510 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341_astrometric_residuals.png (4481 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits Image size: 937.0'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:01:06.201 +77:32:09.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 12:01:06.201 +77:32:09.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0705 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Image size: 937.0'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:01:03.844 +77:32:07.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 12:01:03.844 +77:32:07.49 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0684 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:01:06.201 +77:32:09.73 Second-epoch second image center 12:01:03.844 +77:32:07.49 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00221 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4vBDqD5wWE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OnEwIQY75z Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wbH2Ud6yCl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WrgJjKOT3h Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.726050 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.726050 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.11 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=4.6) Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec +70.4537 to +82.7794 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec 70.4537 to 82.7794 deg Loaded 10790 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3498 out of 3909 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3909 out of 48477 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 91 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 2.2 pix Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 15.5 mag. Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.4vBDqD5wWE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2563, bad_region=10197, passed=51546 Got 51546 stars (including 39295 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51546 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43522 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43522 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43522 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1383 n_q2=893 n_q3=1694 n_q4=938 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.OnEwIQY75z (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2481, bad_region=10008, passed=48460 Got 48460 stars (including 36451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40718 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40718 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40718 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5395) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1429 n_q2=934 n_q3=1639 n_q4=904 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.wbH2Ud6yCl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1282, bad_region=6712, passed=35685 Got 35685 stars (including 28027 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35685 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.2 to 82.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30529 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.2 to 82.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30529 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30529 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=6.710 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.151 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.409 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.456 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.359 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.364 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4904 robust_rms_before=0.809 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.359 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.354 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.364 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.354 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=1377 n_q2=818 n_q3=1774 n_q4=935 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.WrgJjKOT3h (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1333, bad_region=6703, passed=35882 Got 35882 stars (including 28180 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35882 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30730 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30730 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30730 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=6.596 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.174 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.541 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.368 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.385 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=0.824 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.349 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.368 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.357 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.385 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.357 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=1359 n_q2=830 n_q3=1772 n_q4=944 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:27:20.19 +80:01:24.2: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:27:02.39 +79:37:53.0: 10.55 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:49:12.24 +78:09:48.0: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:49:12.24 +78:09:48.0: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:27:02.39 +79:37:53.0: 10.44 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:27:20.19 +80:01:24.2: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.49 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:02.39 +79:37:53.0: ref_mag=10.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8081 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:20.19 +80:01:24.2: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4753 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:49:12.24 +78:09:48.0: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6286 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:42:29.50 +78:21:58.9: 14.53 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:12:31.77 +80:18:50.4: 15.31 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:05:35.47 +73:57:53.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:32:51.43 +77:16:31.9: 15.18 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:42:29.50 +78:21:58.9: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:42:29.50 +78:21:58.9: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4698 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:12:31.77 +80:18:50.4: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:05:35.47 +73:57:53.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:12:31.77 +80:18:50.4: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7229 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:32:51.43 +77:16:31.9: 15.35 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:32:51.43 +77:16:31.9: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6933 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68343.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67768_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67768_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 09 19.29750 2461302.79750 14.54 11:27:20.21 +80:01:24.2 4068 4841 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67769_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67769_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.43 11:27:20.16 +80:01:24.2 4069 4841 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.29750 2461302.79750 14.63 10:49:12.25 +78:09:48.2 2675 4129 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67777_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67777_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.63 10:49:12.24 +78:09:47.9 2676 4129 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 12:04:48.43 +81:25:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67781_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67781_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.75 12:04:48.86 +81:25:18.3 5108 5525 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 12:10:09.43 +73:56:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67785_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67785_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.18 12:10:09.34 +73:56:51.0 4953 1007 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 10:45:10.26 +78:29:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67786_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67786_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 12.78 10:45:10.28 +78:29:20.3 2642 4359 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.29750 2461302.79750 10.82 11:27:02.42 +79:37:53.0 4003 4613 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67798_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67798_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 10.79 11:27:02.36 +79:37:53.0 4004 4613 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67801_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67801_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 10.42 13:10:24.36 +75:12:49.4 7319 1924 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67805_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67805_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 10.60 11:33:21.88 +77:21:39.6 3875 3235 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67811_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67811_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 10.71 10:26:43.44 +74:30:26.0 0970 2491 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67844_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67844_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 10.83 13:03:41.29 +74:39:32.1 7119 1546 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67853_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67853_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 11.65 11:43:09.36 +75:43:57.5 4020 2204 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67862_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67862_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 11.46 10:43:42.54 +71:58:06.0 0940 0773 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67871_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67871_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 11.90 10:30:15.05 +73:10:00.2 0711 1700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67881_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67881_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 12.19 10:19:42.65 +74:11:22.5 0620 2464 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67908_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67908_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 12.45 09:54:44.17 +79:14:31.7 1592 5505 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 13:11:43.42 +80:27:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67920_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67920_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 12.79 13:11:43.44 +80:27:49.8 6730 5048 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 13:10:14.25 +80:00:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67938_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67938_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 12.82 13:10:14.67 +80:00:32.8 6747 4770 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67949_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67949_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 12.67 12:59:31.32 +74:04:20.8 7007 1168 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67983_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 67983_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 12.96 12:49:25.90 +75:37:36.5 6488 2053 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68024_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68024_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.07 10:30:07.17 +80:24:24.2 2777 5588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68025_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68025_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.31 10:28:09.29 +78:27:11.9 2168 4570 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68029_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68029_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.45 12:21:22.67 +80:00:48.6 5470 4654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 12:33:29.25 +75:11:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68038_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68038_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.30 12:33:29.27 +75:11:26.2 5900 1747 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 10:57:14.91 +74:22:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68044_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68044_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.38 10:57:14.79 +74:22:23.8 2070 1896 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 10:40:36.62 +74:52:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68048_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68048_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.39 10:40:36.69 +74:52:59.3 1575 2443 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 10:59:45.67 +79:39:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68053_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68053_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.39 10:59:45.66 +79:39:33.7 3301 4852 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68059_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68059_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.52 13:28:04.63 +79:53:30.0 7224 4812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68062_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68062_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.26 10:09:32.63 +76:41:32.8 1093 3964 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68064_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68064_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.40 11:38:50.77 +73:23:23.1 3587 0841 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68068_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68068_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.22 09:59:41.92 +79:26:44.5 1779 5522 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 09:45:13.78 +78:08:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68071_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68071_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.70 09:45:13.64 +78:08:58.2 0956 5156 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 11:39:18.10 +75:02:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68075_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68075_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.57 11:39:18.21 +75:02:02.9 3798 1816 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68100_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68100_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.26 11:20:04.13 +76:38:24.0 3330 2923 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 12:32:00.42 +74:50:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68117_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68117_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.31 12:32:00.38 +74:50:12.2 5850 1531 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 12:49:00.15 +79:12:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68120_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68120_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.72 12:49:00.26 +79:12:00.9 6245 4199 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68123_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68123_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.65 13:23:22.47 +80:54:13.0 6950 5374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68129_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68129_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.69 10:28:14.41 +78:02:27.3 2051 4349 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68131_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68131_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.79 12:43:32.38 +77:58:43.6 6151 3449 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 10:55:47.38 +77:05:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68141_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68141_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.69 10:55:47.39 +77:05:44.9 2626 3451 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68142_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68142_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.73 09:54:36.45 +79:46:37.2 1784 5768 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68147_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68147_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.58 13:05:24.68 +76:58:46.4 6941 2942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68148_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68148_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.90 13:08:23.24 +79:39:46.8 6738 4555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68150_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68150_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.89 10:42:53.69 +74:25:55.7 1542 2156 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 10:43:14.02 +77:23:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68155_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68155_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.92 10:43:13.95 +77:23:42.7 2310 3782 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 12:34:34.56 +76:02:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68156_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68156_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.79 12:34:34.66 +76:02:07.8 5920 2259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 11:10:34.01 +80:57:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68157_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68157_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.05 11:10:33.64 +80:57:26.9 3822 5502 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68158_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68158_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.53 12:57:16.52 +73:47:01.0 6939 0981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68170_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68170_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.72 11:21:22.21 +81:21:37.2 4133 5663 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 12:20:08.35 +79:11:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68171_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68171_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.15 12:20:08.45 +79:11:37.9 5428 4159 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68186_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68186_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.54 11:00:39.00 +72:48:25.5 1865 0953 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 11:15:45.50 +78:15:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68187_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68187_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.01 11:15:45.42 +78:15:58.6 3469 3905 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68189_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68189_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.79 10:24:47.16 +76:40:09.8 1547 3676 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68190_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68190_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.07 10:22:48.59 +79:10:07.0 2241 5026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68196_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68196_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.63 11:05:35.38 +72:48:46.1 2076 0882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68204_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68204_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.26 11:01:00.86 +81:10:19.0 3652 5700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 11:15:30.14 +75:07:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68206_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68206_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.01 11:15:30.47 +75:07:34.6 2911 2091 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 12:36:28.01 +79:13:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68212_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68212_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.20 12:36:28.30 +79:13:32.6 5890 4186 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68214_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68214_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.24 10:45:28.75 +77:36:54.4 2433 3873 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68220_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68220_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.74 11:50:30.17 +74:39:55.8 4197 1522 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68226_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68226_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.10 09:59:07.11 +77:51:16.2 1201 4745 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 12:34:27.15 +75:39:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68228_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68228_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.02 12:34:27.14 +75:39:12.2 5925 2028 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68235_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68235_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.24 10:09:55.56 +79:46:57.0 2128 5532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68237_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68237_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.20 12:48:47.42 +78:31:09.4 6282 3789 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68240_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68240_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.85 11:36:14.01 +81:22:40.8 4464 5593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68242_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68242_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.91 10:44:54.00 +76:54:16.9 2238 3489 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 13:03:05.95 +76:29:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68259_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68259_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.02 13:03:05.99 +76:29:42.9 6911 2640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits **** FOUND 11:35:38.22 +81:16:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68261_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68261_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.28 11:35:38.10 +81:16:44.2 4438 5537 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68262_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68262_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.28 11:35:40.15 +76:43:27.6 3870 2843 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68270_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68270_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.07 11:01:51.73 +74:41:54.5 2316 2015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68284_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68284_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.28 10:12:17.52 +77:00:28.8 1278 4074 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68287_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68287_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 13.90 11:32:41.53 +73:25:16.5 3330 0914 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68291_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68291_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.09 12:49:49.26 +77:13:59.6 6397 3020 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68301_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68301_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.21 10:15:41.11 +74:50:24.0 0684 2888 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68302_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68302_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.29 10:00:02.49 +77:04:43.6 0951 4343 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.29750 2461302.79750 14.51 09:42:29.59 +78:21:59.7 0972 5313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68308_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68308_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.44 09:42:29.42 +78:21:58.1 0973 5312 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68310_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68310_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.15 10:37:40.60 +74:08:57.9 1272 2092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68313_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68313_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.28 11:27:11.10 +77:44:38.4 3732 3506 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68316_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68316_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.79 12:44:40.39 +79:14:06.0 6121 4208 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68325_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68325_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.89 12:50:54.20 +81:25:27.6 6148 5544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68330_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68330_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.38 10:08:18.07 +77:13:41.6 1236 4260 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68331_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68331_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.59 11:22:07.11 +80:53:12.3 4074 5381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.29750 2461302.79750 14.60 13:12:31.34 +80:18:48.9 6767 4963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68343_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 Preparing report for the candidate 68343_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68347_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68347_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 15.00 13:12:32.21 +80:18:51.8 6769 4964 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.29750 2461302.79750 14.69 10:32:51.54 +77:16:31.3 1966 3869 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-08-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68349_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68349_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.70 10:32:51.31 +77:16:32.5 1967 3869 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68360_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68360_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.31 09:57:48.89 +78:57:52.5 1564 5316 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68370_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68370_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.33 10:42:54.27 +76:24:06.2 2047 3241 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68378_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68378_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.38 11:28:52.84 +73:13:06.1 3140 0831 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68380_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68380_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.71 10:21:50.08 +77:08:41.3 1601 3977 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68402_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68402_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.62 12:44:02.52 +77:15:43.3 6203 3019 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68404_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 The candidate 68404_fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.95 12:49:49.02 +78:39:19.4 6304 3874 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 21s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 13:05:35.47 +73:57:53.6 ########### Completed Cam-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 13:05:35.47 +73:57:53.6 ################################################################################### 13:05:35.47 +73:57:53.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 13:05:35.47 +73:57:53.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 13:05:35.47 +73:57:53.6 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 13:05:35.47 +73:57:53.6 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.79749910 -observatory V36 12:49:19.55 -05:35:59.4 Mercury (-0.3mag) 14:01:28.22 -18:29:52.3 Venus (-4.8mag) 07:45:42.11 +22:02:53.2 Mars (1.2mag) 09:18:38.45 +16:16:13.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:48:43.13 +02:17:47.1 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:34.76 +21:01:43.9 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:12:34.22 -00:11:05.8 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:52.25 -23:41:54.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 17:59:48.86 -28:19:06.6 Moon (-10.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 19 02:17 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.79749910: 09:18:45.69 +16:15:37.1 Io (6.0mag) 09:18:36.93 +16:16:21.6 Europa (6.2mag) 09:18:47.59 +16:15:28.2 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:18:36.09 +16:16:25.6 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:16:55.87 +16:36:56.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:18:40.04 +16:16:06.2 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:16:21.84 +16:31:17.4 Elara (17.7mag) 09:22:10.47 +15:40:47.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:18:51.06 +16:37:20.2 Carme (18.9mag) 00:48:54.70 +02:17:39.5 Titan (8.3mag) 00:48:43.30 +02:17:49.4 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:48:24.14 +02:18:24.0 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:48:26.94 +02:17:44.7 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:47:18.23 +02:06:31.5 Phoebe (16.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 19 02:17 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.79749910: 23:47:00.40 +12:32:19.1 JWST 13:37:36.23 +53:21:41.5 Chandra 11:12:03.42 -59:47:59.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 19 02:17 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.79749910 -observatory V36 03:45:52.59 +19:48:32.5 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:08:26.28 -33:58:44.7 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:27:58.03 -70:59:49.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:37.87 +34:01:15.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:03:54.87 +46:59:29.3 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:04:24.03 +27:06:43.8 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:18:39.04 +25:45:50.0 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 11:00:27.85 +26:49:51.9 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:56:06.92 +05:09:55.1 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:26.05 -16:41:46.8 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:48:12.68 +33:42:07.6 16.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:08:38.49 +15:11:47.5 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:27:52.13 +42:37:59.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:10:55.68 +48:27:44.6 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:41:09.68 -13:13:06.2 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:14:49.29 +16:04:03.9 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:37:48.11 +17:48:47.2 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:29:55.72 -00:52:05.0 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:17:35.33 +71:46:54.9 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:58:03.17 +45:34:10.5 17.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:24:31.23 +12:16:04.0 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:36:16.18 -35:02:21.4 13.7mag 10P/Tempel 01:38:09.24 +39:00:19.8 17.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:56:16.21 -06:23:22.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:32:43.67 -08:50:19.3 17.8mag 63P/Wild 07:01:30.61 +18:14:30.0 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:15:31.92 +15:00:41.3 16.8mag 88P/Howell 06:19:13.11 +33:05:24.4 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:06:14.36 +21:28:33.8 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:54:20.08 +18:15:47.8 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:13:35.53 -25:24:45.6 17.6mag 124P/Mrkos 06:31:06.18 +20:13:32.1 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 01:23:59.17 -14:46:19.4 14.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:33:59.98 +07:56:50.4 12.6mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:40.37 +07:18:57.2 14.6mag 220P/McNaught 05:18:56.78 +39:50:11.8 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 09:02:59.78 +34:18:36.7 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:33:37.68 -01:34:47.7 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:37:55.92 +16:14:41.8 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 19 02:17 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 19 02:17 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 19 02:17 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:45:20.862 -05:19:19.97 AT 2026aacc 2026-08-23.15 19.4444 15:56:38.169 +18:42:01.63 SN 2026aacb 2026-08-29.18 19.5538 20:55:37.041 -01:27:15.88 AT 2026aaca 2026-08-30.60 19.51 14:43:57.052 -18:28:53.81 SN 2026aabz 2026-08-30.23 18.705 13:37:12.730 -32:27:40.17 AT 2026aaby 2026-08-30.72 18.545 06:50:17.864 +20:05:46.74 AT 2026aabx 2026-08-30.61 17.869 05:36:22.321 -31:19:59.16 AT 2026aabw 2026-08-30.79 18.65 17:26:25.715 +35:28:47.48 AT 2026aabv 2026-08-30.35 18.678 03:41:51.198 -40:54:09.63 AT 2026aabu 2026-08-22.78 20.13 15:50:13.320 -33:32:57.31 AT 2026aabt 2026-08-29.37 19.72 01:18:28.460 -27:05:47.26 SN 2026aabs 2026-08-27.78 19.28 22:23:15.798 -29:48:02.93 AT 2026aabr 2026-08-30.57 19.11 23:23:45.523 -29:23:36.22 SN 2026aabq 2026-08-23.58 19.7 22:48:33.213 -45:12:00.11 AT 2026aabp 2026-08-30.61 18.75 00:44:54.260 +41:33:10.49 AT 2026aabo 2026-08-29.40 18.5784 01:36:46.683 +30:41:53.77 AT 2026aabn 2026-08-28.69 20.82 01:39:53.640 +34:03:40.40 AT 2026aabm 2026-08-26.73 20.83 00:25:36.720 +41:26:16.16 AT 2026aabl 2026-08-26.72 20.57 00:06:22.110 +41:47:11.52 AT 2026aabk 2026-08-23.72 21.3 16:34:18.591 +32:50:04.19 AT 2026aabj 2026-08-23.59 21.08 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 19 02:17 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.29819 2461302.79819 14.86 13:13:38.58 +76:26:53.8 7285 2681 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_021335_TTUQ2b1x1_3013670_PN68JdV2/fd_Cam-05-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_02-09-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0341.fits
