NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-10-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
Field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-10-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-10-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 317023 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 317023 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits_preview.png'
Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits

renamed 'Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits_preview.png'
Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1164.6233 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 463.0200 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1883.3303 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 529.9437 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1883.1868 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 529.9170 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.61712 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T01:18:20.5210869' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T06:18:20.5210869' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.2627375117 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T06:18:30.4211174' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.2628520951 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 13.3316265968873 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9998137457175 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 34.0125 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 153.589444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.78396919645683 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20453 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20453 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 55.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 9.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.900632 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits :) Spent 0.714559 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T01:19:02.3572858' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T06:19:02.3572858' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.2632217244 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T06:19:12.2616287' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.2633363539 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 13.3316265593102 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9998137431467 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 34.0772222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 153.775277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.78100721659505 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20453 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20453 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 55.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 9.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.900632 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits :) Spent 0.666683 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits


fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.76285325 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:34.216 -17:59:49.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:34.216 -17:59:49.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0625 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:34.676 -18:00:13.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:34.676 -18:00:13.24 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0632 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:53:34.216 -17:59:49.31 Second-epoch second image center 00:53:34.676 -18:00:13.24 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00689 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wshBVZkNtA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZJgkEr3JoG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QJzWji7uT6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h0nFLmLATq Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.879650 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.879650 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=5.9) Read 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg Loaded 4161 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2348 out of 2396 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2396 out of 4144 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=5.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 2.1 pix Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 2.3 pix fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits 2.3 pix fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 14.9 mag. Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.wshBVZkNtA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, bad_region=1038, passed=4470 Got 4470 stars (including 3173 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3120 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3118 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3645 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3120 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3645 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3645 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 3118 stars left (next iteration limit 3429) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=3118 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=970 n_q2=588 n_q3=960 n_q4=600 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.ZJgkEr3JoG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=259, bad_region=948, passed=4144 Got 4144 stars (including 2986 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2932 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3382 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3382 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3382 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 2935 stars left (next iteration limit 3225) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=2935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=910 n_q2=554 n_q3=908 n_q4=563 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.QJzWji7uT6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=237, bad_region=807, passed=3531 Got 3531 stars (including 2540 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3531 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2494 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2492 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2492 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2492 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2874 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2495 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2493 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2874 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2493 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2874 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 2493 stars left (next iteration limit 2741) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2493 robust_rms=6.759 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.636 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2493 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.646 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2493 robust_rms=0.342 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.394 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2493 robust_rms_before=1.033 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.342 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.367 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.394 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.367 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits N_match=2493 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=794 n_q2=443 n_q3=819 n_q4=437 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.h0nFLmLATq (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=228, bad_region=805, passed=3546 Got 3546 stars (including 2563 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3546 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2519 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2517 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2517 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2517 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2520 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2518 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2518 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 2518 stars left (next iteration limit 2768) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2518 robust_rms=6.769 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.339 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2518 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.535 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2518 robust_rms=0.314 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.344 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2518 robust_rms_before=0.971 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.301 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.314 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.324 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.344 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.324 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits N_match=2518 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=805 n_q2=445 n_q3=828 n_q4=440 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.228 ref2=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.141 new1=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits sigma_overall=0.344 worst_q_ratio=1.137 new2=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.127 reference average sigma_overall=0.2775 worst_q_ratio=1.1845 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (3118 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (2935 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296_astrometric_residuals.png (2493 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297_astrometric_residuals.png (2518 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:34.216 -17:59:49.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:34.216 -17:59:49.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0625 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:34.676 -18:00:13.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:34.676 -18:00:13.24 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0632 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:53:34.216 -17:59:49.31 Second-epoch second image center 00:53:34.676 -18:00:13.24 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00689 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eE3PrpgQXQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vspsLrlWkR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gLRpAD06W2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.94uB8qgUrD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.766400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.766400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=4.7) Read 21682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg Loaded 4192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2550 out of 2661 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2661 out of 21682 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 24 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 15.1 mag. Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.eE3PrpgQXQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=893, bad_region=4833, passed=24282 Got 24282 stars (including 18732 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24282 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20545 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20545 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20545 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1559 n_q2=934 n_q3=1493 n_q4=894 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.vspsLrlWkR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=669, bad_region=3901, passed=21676 Got 21676 stars (including 17202 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21676 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18628 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18628 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18628 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5357) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1587 n_q2=945 n_q3=1469 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.gLRpAD06W2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=599, bad_region=3313, passed=19284 Got 19284 stars (including 15490 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19284 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4863 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16772 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16772 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16772 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5349) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=6.591 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.618 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.515 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.649 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.378 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.423 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4865 robust_rms_before=1.024 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.378 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.395 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.423 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.395 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=1534 n_q2=837 n_q3=1591 n_q4=903 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.94uB8qgUrD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=609, bad_region=3296, passed=19119 Got 19119 stars (including 15333 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19119 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16636 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16636 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16636 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5355) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=6.628 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.124 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.557 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.388 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=0.970 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.338 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.367 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.388 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.367 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=1529 n_q2=835 n_q3=1601 n_q4=904 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:35:23.89 -15:20:37.1: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:00:29.99 -19:24:26.7: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:47:05.12 -19:45:29.5: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:43:42.23 -19:45:39.2: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:35:45.95 -21:13:35.1: 14.97 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:38:11.80 -19:38:40.8: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:42:14.84 -18:55:23.2: 15.25 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:48:39.09 -21:48:09.3: 14.94 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:35:55.56 -19:07:10.6: 14.95 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:00:29.99 -19:24:26.7: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:35:23.89 -15:20:37.1: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:00:29.99 -19:24:26.7: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5185 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:23.89 -15:20:37.1: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8779 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:43:42.23 -19:45:39.2: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:47:05.12 -19:45:29.5: 13.92 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:35:45.95 -21:13:35.1: 15.16 +/- 0.29 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:42.23 -19:45:39.2: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3356 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:45.95 -21:13:35.1: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4540 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:47:05.12 -19:45:29.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9051 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:38:11.80 -19:38:40.8: 14.61 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:38:11.80 -19:38:40.8: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5060 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:37:13.80 -19:26:55.2: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:42:14.84 -18:55:23.2: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:14.84 -18:55:23.2: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6224 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:48:39.09 -21:48:09.3: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:39.09 -21:48:09.3: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4841 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:35:55.56 -19:07:10.6: 14.76 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:55.56 -19:07:10.6: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6266 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:37:13.80 -19:26:55.2: 15.18 +/- 0.28 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:37:13.80 -19:26:55.2: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6005 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30737_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 30737_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.26285    2461302.76285    13.80    00:35:23.99 -15:20:37.2   2140 4786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    13.99    00:35:23.80 -15:20:37.1   2138 4790   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30976_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 30976_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    10.69    01:11:23.60 -20:01:49.9   7319 1924   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31002_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 31002_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    10.82    00:47:13.02 -17:56:18.3   3875 3235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31262_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 31262_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    11.65    00:43:24.72 -18:26:55.4   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32839_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 32839_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.26285    2461302.76285    13.52    01:00:30.05 -19:24:27.4   5773 2333   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    13.52    01:00:29.93 -19:24:26.0   5771 2338   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32927_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 32927_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    13.69    00:45:06.97 -21:53:16.1   3587 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33148_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 33148_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    13.77    01:10:10.58 -15:16:25.1   7224 4812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33502_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 33502_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    13.91    00:35:34.03 -15:42:20.0   2168 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33661_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 33661_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    13.96    00:58:12.21 -15:34:52.8   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33709_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 33709_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    14.01    01:08:12.70 -14:21:33.2   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33804_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 33804_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    14.21    01:05:33.40 -19:51:19.0   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33890_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 33890_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.26285    2461302.76285    14.13    00:47:05.16 -19:45:29.2   3861 2131   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    13.78    00:47:05.08 -19:45:29.8   3860 2135   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34217_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 34217_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.26285    2461302.76285    14.32    00:43:42.23 -19:45:39.2   3379 2126   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    14.35    00:43:42.23 -19:45:39.3   3378 2130   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34362_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 34362_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    14.28    01:02:44.51 -14:06:06.0   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34418_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 34418_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    14.27    01:03:01.36 -17:33:32.1   6151 3449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34433_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 34433_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    14.43    00:51:03.51 -15:05:41.0   4430 4955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34512_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 34512_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.26285    2461302.76285    14.51    00:38:11.75 -19:38:40.7   2592 2185   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    14.50    00:38:11.84 -19:38:41.0   2591 2189   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34545_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 34545_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.26285    2461302.76285    14.52    00:35:46.01 -21:13:35.4   2261 1217   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    14.41    00:35:45.89 -21:13:34.9   2260 1221   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34550_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 34550_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    14.56    00:34:44.32 -16:03:59.8   2051 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34559_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 34559_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.26285    2461302.76285    14.56    00:48:39.09 -21:48:10.2   4085 0892   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    14.43    00:48:39.08 -21:48:08.3   4084 0896   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34590_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 34590_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.26285    2461302.76285    14.63    00:42:14.87 -18:55:23.0   3167 2630   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    14.61    00:42:14.80 -18:55:23.5   3165 2634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34593_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 34593_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.26285    2461302.76285    14.64    00:35:55.53 -19:07:10.7   2261 2497   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    14.61    00:35:55.58 -19:07:10.6   2260 2501   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34596_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 34596_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 19.26285    2461302.76285    14.60    00:37:13.75 -19:26:55.3   2451 2301   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    14.60    00:37:13.84 -19:26:55.1   2450 2305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34618_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 The candidate 34618_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 19.26334    2461302.76334    14.77    01:09:20.64 -21:17:25.8   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_012337_TTUQ2b1x1_756545_KpdPlncU/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-09-19_01-19-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cet-10-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.76285325 -observatory V36 12:49:08.05 -05:34:30.6 Mercury (-0.3mag) 14:01:24.61 -18:29:18.6 Venus (-4.8mag) 07:45:36.71 +22:03:04.2 Mars (1.2mag) 09:18:36.83 +16:16:20.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:48:43.70 +02:17:50.9 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:34.83 +21:01:44.0 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:12:34.44 -00:11:04.4 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:52.36 -23:41:53.9 Pluto (14.5mag) 17:58:01.69 -28:24:54.1 Moon (-10.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 19 01:28 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.76285325: 09:18:43.86 +16:15:45.2 Io (6.0mag) 09:18:34.72 +16:16:31.6 Europa (6.2mag) 09:18:45.55 +16:15:37.4 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:18:34.83 +16:16:30.8 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:16:54.14 +16:37:02.7 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:18:37.35 +16:16:18.4 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:16:20.15 +16:31:23.7 Elara (17.7mag) 09:22:08.93 +15:40:54.5 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:18:49.59 +16:37:26.6 Carme (18.9mag) 00:48:55.32 +02:17:42.8 Titan (8.3mag) 00:48:44.14 +02:17:52.8 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:48:24.80 +02:18:28.3 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:48:27.50 +02:17:48.8 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:47:18.84 +02:06:35.4 Phoebe (16.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 19 01:28 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.76285325: 23:46:55.12 +12:30:33.3 JWST 13:12:28.98 +53:17:40.5 Chandra 10:48:34.39 -58:42:11.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 19 01:28 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.76285325 -observatory V36 03:45:51.98 +19:48:28.3 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:08:25.10 -33:58:47.5 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:27:56.66 -70:59:41.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:37.79 +34:01:12.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:03:53.64 +46:59:14.1 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:04:25.52 +27:07:01.0 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:18:37.69 +25:45:52.0 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 11:00:25.95 +26:49:55.6 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:56:05.65 +05:09:55.8 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:26.21 -16:41:36.1 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:48:11.09 +33:41:58.2 16.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:08:38.03 +15:11:48.6 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:27:52.81 +42:38:06.5 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:10:58.11 +48:27:55.4 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:41:08.87 -13:13:03.9 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:14:48.90 +16:04:30.4 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:37:44.55 +17:48:57.4 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:29:53.84 -00:51:54.6 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:17:28.25 +71:47:22.6 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:58:04.85 +45:34:18.3 17.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:24:29.23 +12:15:53.7 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:36:14.54 -35:02:29.8 13.7mag 10P/Tempel 01:38:06.23 +39:00:04.6 17.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:56:14.79 -06:23:12.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:32:39.45 -08:49:41.1 17.8mag 63P/Wild 07:01:26.95 +18:14:41.2 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:15:32.70 +15:00:42.4 16.8mag 88P/Howell 06:19:05.80 +33:04:38.9 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:06:08.58 +21:29:11.0 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:54:15.53 +18:16:15.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:13:30.70 -25:24:04.6 17.6mag 124P/Mrkos 06:31:03.96 +20:13:36.7 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 01:24:15.80 -14:47:11.7 14.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:33:57.89 +07:57:36.1 12.6mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:39.69 +07:19:10.8 14.6mag 220P/McNaught 05:18:51.76 +39:49:36.8 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 09:02:54.55 +34:18:52.1 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:33:36.11 -01:34:34.1 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:37:54.19 +16:14:47.9 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 19 01:28 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 19 01:28 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 19 01:28 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:45:20.862 -05:19:19.97 AT 2026aacc 2026-08-23.15 19.4444 15:56:38.169 +18:42:01.63 SN 2026aacb 2026-08-29.18 19.5538 20:55:37.041 -01:27:15.88 AT 2026aaca 2026-08-30.60 19.51 14:43:57.052 -18:28:53.81 SN 2026aabz 2026-08-30.23 18.705 13:37:12.730 -32:27:40.17 AT 2026aaby 2026-08-30.72 18.545 06:50:17.864 +20:05:46.74 AT 2026aabx 2026-08-30.61 17.869 05:36:22.321 -31:19:59.16 AT 2026aabw 2026-08-30.79 18.65 17:26:25.715 +35:28:47.48 AT 2026aabv 2026-08-30.35 18.678 03:41:51.198 -40:54:09.63 AT 2026aabu 2026-08-22.78 20.13 15:50:13.320 -33:32:57.31 AT 2026aabt 2026-08-29.37 19.72 01:18:28.460 -27:05:47.26 SN 2026aabs 2026-08-27.78 19.28 22:23:15.798 -29:48:02.93 AT 2026aabr 2026-08-30.57 19.11 23:23:45.523 -29:23:36.22 SN 2026aabq 2026-08-23.58 19.7 22:48:33.213 -45:12:00.11 AT 2026aabp 2026-08-30.61 18.75 00:44:54.260 +41:33:10.49 AT 2026aabo 2026-08-29.40 18.5784 01:36:46.683 +30:41:53.77 AT 2026aabn 2026-08-28.69 20.82 01:39:53.640 +34:03:40.40 AT 2026aabm 2026-08-26.73 20.83 00:25:36.720 +41:26:16.16 AT 2026aabl 2026-08-26.72 20.57 00:06:22.110 +41:47:11.52 AT 2026aabk 2026-08-23.72 21.3 16:34:18.591 +32:50:04.19 AT 2026aabj 2026-08-23.59 21.08 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 19 01:28 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C