fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 19.25628 | 2461302.75628 | 13.38 | 00:50:30.73 -12:59:05.4 | 4222 6145 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 19.25703 | 2461302.75703 | 13.27 | 00:50:30.69 -12:59:05.4 | 4215 6151 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 19.2567 2461302.7567 13.32 00:50:30.71 -12:59:05.4
122.00871 -75.85492 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
893 Leopoldina 0 -0 0 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:50:30.71 -12:59:05.4: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:50:30.71 -12:59:05.4: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cet-10-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cet-10-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Cet-10-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 324578 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 324578 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits_preview.png'
Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
renamed 'Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits_preview.png'
Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1164.6233 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 463.0200 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2011.6222 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 583.6364 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2010.4857 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 583.8284 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.72727 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T01:08:52.5679560' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T06:08:52.5679560' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.2561639701 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T06:09:02.4678315' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.256278553 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 13.3316269376792 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9995359992002 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 33.0980555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 151.114166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.8271440176296 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29541 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29541 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 54.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 17.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.00072 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits :) Spent 0.793036 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-19T01:09:57.6070984' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-19T06:09:57.6070984' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61302.2569167479 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-19T06:10:07.5119271' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61302.2570313774 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 13.3316268785934 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9995359951582 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 33.2080555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 151.398333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.82181608248994 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29541 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29541 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 54.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 17.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.00072 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits :) Spent 0.713302 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461302.75627971 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:12.569 -17:55:02.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:12.569 -17:55:02.85 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0962 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:15.425 -17:55:42.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:15.425 -17:55:42.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0832 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:53:12.569 -17:55:02.85 Second-epoch second image center 00:53:15.425 -17:55:42.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01571 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3XmJq3cmhZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5YHI9KUGvf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t0IQ2gGSyK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NDvRlthPmX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.886450 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.886450 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg Loaded 4161 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2348 out of 2396 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2396 out of 4144 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 2.1 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 14.9 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.3XmJq3cmhZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, bad_region=0, passed=4470 Got 4470 stars (including 4148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4069 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4067 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4069 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4067 stars left (next iteration limit 4473) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4067 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=970 n_q2=1070 n_q3=960 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.5YHI9KUGvf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=259, bad_region=1, passed=4144 Got 4144 stars (including 3880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3804 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 3803 stars left (next iteration limit 4180) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=3803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=909 n_q2=1014 n_q3=908 n_q4=972 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.t0IQ2gGSyK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=210, bad_region=0, passed=3860 Got 3860 stars (including 3645 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3860 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.4 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3579 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3577 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3860 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.4 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3579 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3860 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3860 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 3577 stars left (next iteration limit 3934) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3577 robust_rms=11.035 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.183 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3577 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.391 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3577 robust_rms=0.266 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.290 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3577 robust_rms_before=1.040 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.262 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.266 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.288 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.290 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.288 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits N_match=3577 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=945 n_q2=850 n_q3=931 n_q4=851 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.NDvRlthPmX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=216, bad_region=0, passed=3900 Got 3900 stars (including 3681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3900 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3612 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3610 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3610 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3610 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3900 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3613 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3611 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3900 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3611 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3900 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 3611 stars left (next iteration limit 3971) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3611 robust_rms=11.015 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.106 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3611 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.392 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3611 robust_rms=0.281 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.312 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3611 robust_rms_before=1.044 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.281 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.288 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.312 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.288 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits N_match=3611 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=960 n_q2=866 n_q3=931 n_q4=854 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.044 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.242 ref2=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.079 new1=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits sigma_overall=0.274 worst_q_ratio=1.076 new2=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.044 reference average sigma_overall=0.2825 worst_q_ratio=1.1605 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (4067 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (3803 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252_astrometric_residuals.png (3577 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (3611 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20025_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 20025_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 00:22:30.96 -18:32:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:12.569 -17:55:02.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:12.569 -17:55:02.85 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0962 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:53:15.425 -17:55:42.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 Second-epoch image center 00:53:15.425 -17:55:42.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0832 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:53:12.569 -17:55:02.85 Second-epoch second image center 00:53:15.425 -17:55:42.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01571 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.waRq7N5KlG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k5xhmuaCDR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pPytULyusG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2dcxC8pak9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_ Discovery image 3 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 10.99 00:22:30.96 -18:32:45.0 0405 2475 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits .fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.777200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.777200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 21682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg Loaded 4192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2550 out of 2661 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2661 out of 21682 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 22 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 2.0 pix Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 2.4 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 2.4 pix fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 15.0 mag. Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.waRq7N5KlG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=893, bad_region=1, passed=24280 Got 24280 stars (including 23344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24280 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1223 n_q2=1268 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.k5xhmuaCDR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=669, bad_region=24, passed=21674 Got 21674 stars (including 20941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21674 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5381) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1253 n_q2=1274 n_q3=1187 n_q4=1177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.pPytULyusG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=559, bad_region=7, passed=19832 Got 19832 stars (including 19243 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19832 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.4 to -12.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19832 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.4 to -12.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19832 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19832 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=10.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.947 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.400 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.413 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.316 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=1.041 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.278 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.304 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.316 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.304 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1228 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1321 n_q4=1200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.2dcxC8pak9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=588, bad_region=10, passed=19953 Got 19953 stars (including 19338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19953 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.4 to -12.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.4 to -12.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=10.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.903 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.426 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.327 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=1.044 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.308 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.327 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.308 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1228 n_q2=1148 n_q3=1316 n_q4=1198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.052 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:49:20.99 -19:06:32.9: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:47:05.04 -19:45:30.1: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:50:30.71 -12:59:05.4: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:35:23.93 -15:20:37.4: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:25:30.06 -13:59:59.2: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:22:48.94 -18:49:27.9: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:46:26.77 -17:01:35.9: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:43:42.27 -19:45:40.7: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:36:31.22 -20:49:37.4: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:31:05.74 -18:34:25.0: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:50:30.71 -12:59:05.4: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:25:30.06 -13:59:59.2: 15.10 +/- 0.30 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:22:48.94 -18:49:27.9: 15.08 +/- 0.30 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:36:31.22 -20:49:37.4: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:43:42.27 -19:45:40.7: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:35:23.93 -15:20:37.4: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:47:05.04 -19:45:30.1: 13.90 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:48.94 -18:49:27.9: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2846 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:30.06 -13:59:59.2: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5301 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:31:05.74 -18:34:25.0: 14.69 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:49:20.99 -19:06:32.9: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:31.22 -20:49:37.4: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1921 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:42.27 -19:45:40.7: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2668 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:23.93 -15:20:37.4: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8615 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:47:05.04 -19:45:30.1: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8908 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:05.74 -18:34:25.0: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5613 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:49:20.99 -19:06:32.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4302 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:46:26.77 -17:01:35.9: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:46:26.77 -17:01:35.9: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0124 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:35:56.04 -19:12:10.6: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:21:42.24 -18:13:06.4: 15.00 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:24:08.58 -16:19:58.6: 14.89 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:32:02.89 -20:26:14.5: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:31:35.32 -17:53:24.4: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:32:59.09 -21:36:20.4: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:27:52.09 -13:57:59.1: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:27:30.87 -19:20:58.9: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:47:40.28 -14:45:22.9: 15.21 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:35:56.04 -19:12:10.6: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:21:42.24 -18:13:06.4: 15.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:56.04 -19:12:10.6: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6004 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:32:02.89 -20:26:14.5: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:24:08.58 -16:19:58.6: 15.03 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.23 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:31:35.32 -17:53:24.4: 15.02 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:27:30.87 -19:20:58.9: 14.64 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:42.24 -18:13:06.4: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=14.4326 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:27:52.09 -13:57:59.1: 14.62 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:02.89 -20:26:14.5: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4297 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:32:59.09 -21:36:20.4: 14.70 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:35.32 -17:53:24.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4767 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:08.58 -16:19:58.6: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5736 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:30.87 -19:20:58.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4961 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:47:40.28 -14:45:22.9: 15.13 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:52.09 -13:57:59.1: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5317 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:59.09 -21:36:20.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4190 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:47:40.28 -14:45:22.9: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5416 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:42:21.02 -20:14:01.5: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:36:03.77 -18:47:49.4: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:09:15.26 -17:17:20.8: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:36:03.77 -18:47:49.4: 15.31 +/- 0.33 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:09:15.26 -17:17:20.8: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:03.77 -18:47:49.4: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5544 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:09:15.26 -17:17:20.8: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5398 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:42:21.02 -20:14:01.5: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:21.02 -20:14:01.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6074 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31188.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30807_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 30807_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 13.93 00:35:23.86 -15:20:37.5 2112 4568 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30808_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 30808_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 13.81 00:35:23.99 -15:20:37.3 2105 4574 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 13.26 00:36:31.26 -20:49:37.5 2539 1278 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31188_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 Preparing report for the candidate 31188_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31335_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31335_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 13.14 00:36:31.17 -20:49:37.3 2532 1284 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 13.80 00:47:04.99 -19:45:31.4 3986 2035 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31380_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31380_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.02 00:47:05.08 -19:45:28.9 3979 2041 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 13.96 00:46:26.80 -17:01:36.4 3787 3670 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31457_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31457_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.08 00:46:26.74 -17:01:35.3 3780 3676 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.23 00:22:48.99 -18:49:27.4 0473 2305 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31523_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31523_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.37 00:22:48.89 -18:49:28.5 0465 2311 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.34 00:49:20.99 -19:06:32.8 4282 2446 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31526_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31526_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.56 00:49:20.99 -19:06:32.9 4275 2452 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.46 00:25:30.05 -13:59:57.7 0581 5264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31527_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31527_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.63 00:25:30.06 -14:00:00.8 0574 5269 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.33 00:43:42.28 -19:45:40.4 3508 2000 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31529_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31529_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.23 00:43:42.27 -19:45:41.1 3501 2006 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.53 00:31:05.75 -18:34:26.2 1654 2569 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31539_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31539_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.65 00:31:05.73 -18:34:23.8 1646 2576 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.51 00:24:08.60 -16:19:59.1 0519 3830 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31541_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31541_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.69 00:24:08.56 -16:19:58.1 0511 3837 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.44 00:32:02.91 -20:26:13.1 1886 1458 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31545_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31545_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.42 00:32:02.87 -20:26:15.9 1879 1463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.43 00:21:42.22 -18:13:06.2 0275 2655 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31550_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31550_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.43 00:21:42.25 -18:13:06.6 0267 2661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.51 00:35:56.02 -19:12:10.6 2378 2250 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31563_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31563_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.89 00:35:56.06 -19:12:10.6 2371 2256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.48 00:31:35.35 -17:53:25.3 1689 2988 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31564_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31564_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.47 00:31:35.29 -17:53:23.5 1682 2994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.51 00:27:30.82 -19:20:59.9 1181 2054 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31573_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31573_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.49 00:27:30.92 -19:20:58.0 1174 2060 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.57 00:27:52.22 -13:57:59.3 0931 5313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31574_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31574_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.50 00:27:51.97 -13:57:58.9 0923 5319 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.45 00:32:59.22 -21:36:21.7 2079 0763 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31576_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31576_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.40 00:32:58.96 -21:36:19.2 2071 0770 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.55 00:47:40.26 -14:45:22.6 3874 5048 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31587_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31587_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.54 00:47:40.30 -14:45:23.2 3867 5054 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.56 00:36:03.78 -18:47:48.7 2377 2496 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31596_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31596_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.55 00:36:03.77 -18:47:50.1 2370 2502 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.55 01:09:15.21 -17:17:20.3 7074 3682 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31618_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 31618_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.53 01:09:15.31 -17:17:21.3 7067 3688 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Discovery image 1 2026 09 19.25628 2461302.75628 14.62 00:42:20.96 -20:14:02.0 3336 1702 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-08-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 00:50:30.71 -12:59:05.4 ########### Completed Cet-10-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 00:50:30.71 -12:59:05.4 ################################################################################### 00:50:30.71 -12:59:05.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.75627971 -observatory V36 12:49:05.87 -05:34:13.7 Mercury (-0.3mag) 14:01:23.93 -18:29:12.2 Venus (-4.8mag) 07:45:35.68 +22:03:06.3 Mars (1.2mag) 09:18:36.52 +16:16:21.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:48:43.81 +02:17:51.6 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:34.84 +21:01:44.1 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:12:34.48 -00:11:04.2 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:52.38 -23:41:53.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 17:57:42.38 -28:25:58.7 Moon (-10.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 19 01:11 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.75627971: 09:18:43.51 +16:15:46.8 Io (6.0mag) 09:18:34.30 +16:16:33.5 Europa (6.2mag) 09:18:45.17 +16:15:39.1 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:18:34.59 +16:16:31.7 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:16:53.81 +16:37:03.9 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:18:36.84 +16:16:20.7 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:16:19.83 +16:31:24.9 Elara (17.7mag) 09:22:08.63 +15:40:55.9 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:18:49.31 +16:37:27.8 Carme (18.9mag) 00:48:55.44 +02:17:43.5 Titan (8.3mag) 00:48:44.29 +02:17:53.4 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:48:24.93 +02:18:29.1 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:48:27.61 +02:17:49.6 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:47:18.95 +02:06:36.1 Phoebe (16.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 19 01:12 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461302.75627971: 23:46:54.08 +12:30:12.1 JWST 13:07:24.77 +53:15:08.1 Chandra 10:44:19.36 -58:28:54.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 19 01:11 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461302.75627971 -observatory V36 03:45:51.86 +19:48:27.5 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:08:24.88 -33:58:48.0 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:27:56.40 -70:59:39.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:37.77 +34:01:11.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:03:53.40 +46:59:11.2 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:04:25.81 +27:07:04.2 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:18:37.43 +25:45:52.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 11:00:25.59 +26:49:56.3 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:56:05.41 +05:09:55.9 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:26.24 -16:41:34.1 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:48:10.78 +33:41:56.5 16.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:08:37.95 +15:11:48.9 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:27:52.94 +42:38:07.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:10:58.57 +48:27:57.5 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:41:08.72 -13:13:03.5 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:14:48.83 +16:04:35.4 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:37:43.88 +17:48:59.3 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:29:53.49 -00:51:52.7 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:17:26.91 +71:47:27.8 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:58:05.17 +45:34:19.7 17.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:24:28.85 +12:15:51.7 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:36:14.23 -35:02:31.4 13.7mag 10P/Tempel 01:38:05.65 +39:00:01.6 17.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:56:14.52 -06:23:10.9 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:32:38.65 -08:49:33.8 17.8mag 63P/Wild 07:01:26.25 +18:14:43.4 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:15:32.84 +15:00:42.6 16.8mag 88P/Howell 06:19:04.41 +33:04:30.3 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:06:07.48 +21:29:18.1 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:54:14.67 +18:16:20.6 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:13:29.79 -25:23:56.8 17.6mag 124P/Mrkos 06:31:03.54 +20:13:37.5 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 01:24:18.95 -14:47:21.5 14.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:33:57.50 +07:57:44.8 12.6mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:39.56 +07:19:13.4 14.6mag 220P/McNaught 05:18:50.80 +39:49:30.2 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 09:02:53.56 +34:18:55.0 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:33:35.81 -01:34:31.5 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:37:53.87 +16:14:49.1 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 19 01:11 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 19 01:11 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 19 01:11 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:45:20.862 -05:19:19.97 AT 2026aacc 2026-08-23.15 19.4444 15:56:38.169 +18:42:01.63 SN 2026aacb 2026-08-29.18 19.5538 20:55:37.041 -01:27:15.88 AT 2026aaca 2026-08-30.60 19.51 14:43:57.052 -18:28:53.81 SN 2026aabz 2026-08-30.23 18.705 13:37:12.730 -32:27:40.17 AT 2026aaby 2026-08-30.72 18.545 06:50:17.864 +20:05:46.74 AT 2026aabx 2026-08-30.61 17.869 05:36:22.321 -31:19:59.16 AT 2026aabw 2026-08-30.79 18.65 17:26:25.715 +35:28:47.48 AT 2026aabv 2026-08-30.35 18.678 03:41:51.198 -40:54:09.63 AT 2026aabu 2026-08-22.78 20.13 15:50:13.320 -33:32:57.31 AT 2026aabt 2026-08-29.37 19.72 01:18:28.460 -27:05:47.26 SN 2026aabs 2026-08-27.78 19.28 22:23:15.798 -29:48:02.93 AT 2026aabr 2026-08-30.57 19.11 23:23:45.523 -29:23:36.22 SN 2026aabq 2026-08-23.58 19.7 22:48:33.213 -45:12:00.11 AT 2026aabp 2026-08-30.61 18.75 00:44:54.260 +41:33:10.49 AT 2026aabo 2026-08-29.40 18.5784 01:36:46.683 +30:41:53.77 AT 2026aabn 2026-08-28.69 20.82 01:39:53.640 +34:03:40.40 AT 2026aabm 2026-08-26.73 20.83 00:25:36.720 +41:26:16.16 AT 2026aabl 2026-08-26.72 20.57 00:06:22.110 +41:47:11.52 AT 2026aabk 2026-08-23.72 21.3 16:34:18.591 +32:50:04.19 AT 2026aabj 2026-08-23.59 21.08 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 19 01:11 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 2 2026 09 19.25703 2461302.75703 14.59 00:42:21.07 -20:14:01.0 3329 1708 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-19_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_011044_TTUQ1b1x1_2511238_xp68lqCq/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-09-19_01-09-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
