This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4506 2461301.9506 10.57 05:34:30.39 -05:21:54.0
208.89565 -19.54333 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.9" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" [H97b] 3063
Type: TTS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.060 I Y 0.370 I
ATTENTION: measured mag 10.57 is 5.1 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 15.69 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:34:30.39 -05:21:54.0: 13.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:34:30.39 -05:21:54.0: 13.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.4506* 05 34 30.39 -05 21 54.0 10.6 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
[H97b] 3063,2461301.9506,10.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
[H97b] 3063 20260918.4506 10.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4506 2461301.9506 11.73 05:34:33.83 -05:21:19.4
208.89341 -19.52625 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.7" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX21" V1979 Ori
Type: INSB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.910 I Y 0.040 I M1.5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:34:33.83 -05:21:19.4: 13.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:34:33.83 -05:21:19.4: 14.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.4506* 05 34 33.83 -05 21 19.4 11.7 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1979 Ori,2461301.9506,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1979 Ori 20260918.4506 11.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4506 2461301.9506 12.87 05:01:53.31 -12:54:10.3
212.55295 -30.05832 galactic Lep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.183 Istria -0 0 1 12.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:01:53.31 -12:54:10.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:01:53.31 -12:54:10.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.9506,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.4506 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.70038179 18.01.2026 04:48:22.987 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
First image: 2461058.70038179 18.01.2026 04:48:22.987 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Last image: 2461301.95089556 18.09.2026 10:49:07.376 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 25
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10895
Objects passed selection criteria: 10890
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10303.5
Average stars matched: 10009.8 (97.149 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236188 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 05:52:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.70038179 18.01.2026 04:48:22.987 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
First image: 2461058.70038179 18.01.2026 04:48:22.987 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Last image: 2461301.95089556 18.09.2026 10:49:07.376 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 65
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 64296
Objects passed selection criteria: 64155
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59465
Average stars matched: 57012.5 (95.8757 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 282760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 05:54:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461301.95033351
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:36.074 -09:59:55.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39
Second-epoch image center 05:08:36.074 -09:59:55.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0115 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:33.519 -10:00:21.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39
Second-epoch image center 05:08:33.519 -10:00:21.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0011 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:36.074 -09:59:55.94
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:33.519 -10:00:21.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01259 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bhWTJQl9Vr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VWoCBN16qB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits &> /tmp/tmp.feNVgO3CNk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q5rHqWirJL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1320 to 85.3599 deg, Dec -15.3183 to -4.5790 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1320 to 85.3599 deg, Dec -15.3183 to -4.5790 deg
Loaded 8249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6415 out of 6782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6782 out of 10760 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1320 to 85.3599 deg, Dec -15.3183 to -4.5790 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1320 to 85.3599 deg, Dec -15.3183 to -4.5790 deg
Loaded 8249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6415 out of 6782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6782 out of 10760 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 10560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1304 to 85.3494 deg, Dec -15.3101 to -4.5585 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1304 to 85.3494 deg, Dec -15.3101 to -4.5585 deg
Loaded 8259 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6348 out of 6710 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6710 out of 10560 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 25 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.0 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
2.7 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
2.7 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
15.2 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.bhWTJQl9Vr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=939, bad_region=0, passed=10760
Got 10760 stars (including 9804 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10760 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.245 n_q1=1330 n_q2=1245 n_q3=1260 n_q4=1057 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.276
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VWoCBN16qB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=913, bad_region=0, passed=10560
Got 10560 stars (including 9639 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10560 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1318 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1268 n_q4=1063 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.508
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.feNVgO3CNk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=648, bad_region=1, passed=10111
Got 10111 stars (including 9453 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10111 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=9.736 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.740 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.358 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.304 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.775 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.255 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.301 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.304
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.301 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.228 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1066 n_q2=1207 n_q3=1262 n_q4=1345 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.q5rHqWirJL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=649, bad_region=0, passed=10062
Got 10062 stars (including 9395 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10062 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=9.766 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.657 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.390 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.269 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.306 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=0.781 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.269 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.269 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.313 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.306
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.313 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=1067 n_q2=1217 n_q3=1263 n_q4=1332 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits sigma_overall=0.284 worst_q_ratio=1.276
ref2=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.508
new1=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits sigma_overall=0.260 worst_q_ratio=1.188
new2=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits sigma_overall=0.278 worst_q_ratio=1.142
reference average sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.392
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496_astrometric_residuals.png (4879 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:34:30.39 -05:21:54.0: 13.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:07:28.48 -08:40:52.2: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:34:33.83 -05:21:19.4: 13.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:10:14.96 -08:03:02.6: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:12:09.79 -09:24:34.5: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:16:48.76 -09:15:58.8: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:16:48.74 -05:10:12.5: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:12:54.93 -10:07:04.5: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:11:35.25 -08:59:12.5: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:07:28.48 -08:40:52.2: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:34:30.39 -05:21:54.0: 13.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:34:33.83 -05:21:19.4: 14.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:17:24.67 -09:28:57.0: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:28.48 -08:40:52.2: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8968 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:10:14.96 -08:03:02.6: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:14.96 -08:03:02.6: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9578 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:16:48.76 -09:15:58.8: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:12:09.79 -09:24:34.5: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:48.76 -09:15:58.8: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9915 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:16:48.74 -05:10:12.5: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:09.79 -09:24:34.5: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0075 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:12:54.93 -10:07:04.5: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:48.74 -05:10:12.5: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1115 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:11:35.25 -08:59:12.5: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:54.93 -10:07:04.5: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0934 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:35.25 -08:59:12.5: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1029 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:17:24.67 -09:28:57.0: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:24.67 -09:28:57.0: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1525 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:11:53.01 -09:53:24.3: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:14:10.86 -08:44:53.0: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:15:08.28 -12:13:57.4: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:29:32.21 -07:37:31.3: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:11:53.01 -09:53:24.3: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:53.01 -09:53:24.3: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1607 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:14:10.86 -08:44:53.0: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:15:08.28 -12:13:57.4: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:10.86 -08:44:53.0: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1393 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:29:32.21 -07:37:31.3: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:08.28 -12:13:57.4: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1434 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:32.21 -07:37:31.3: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1766 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20604.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20758.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20522_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20522_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:26.30 -05:25:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20604_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
Preparing report for the candidate 20604_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20631_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20631_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:43.63 -05:18:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20637_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20637_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:38.75 -05:24:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20654_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20654_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:43.67 -08:15:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20665_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20665_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:19.66 -05:27:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20677_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20677_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:43.08 -05:13:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20737_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20737_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20758_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
Preparing report for the candidate 20758_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20785_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20785_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20798_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20798_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20813_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20813_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20816_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20816_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20839_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20839_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20842_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20842_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20845_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20845_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20849_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20849_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:56.49 -13:04:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20850_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20850_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20851_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20851_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20852_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20852_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20862_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20862_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20865_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20865_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06426_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 06426_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:20.72 -10:37:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20016_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 20016_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:43.53 -14:23:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10563_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 10563_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:36.41 -14:48:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 16s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:34:30.39 -05:21:54.0
05:34:33.83 -05:21:19.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:36.074 -09:59:55.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39
Second-epoch image center 05:08:36.074 -09:59:55.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0115 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:33.519 -10:00:21.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39
Second-epoch image center 05:08:33.519 -10:00:21.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0011 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:36.074 -09:59:55.94
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:33.519 -10:00:21.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01259 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1lpYPxopFS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XRPTbamFrh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uGqkW5oM97
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GpL36bU9kU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 65142 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1235 to 85.3642 deg, Dec -15.3210 to -4.5615 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1235 to 85.3642 deg, Dec -15.3210 to -4.5615 deg
Loaded 8277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6072 out of 7032 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7032 out of 65142 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.728850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.728850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 65142 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1235 to 85.3642 deg, Dec -15.3210 to -4.5615 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1235 to 85.3642 deg, Dec -15.3210 to -4.5615 deg
Loaded 8277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6072 out of 7032 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7032 out of 65142 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 68251 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1182 to 85.3598 deg, Dec -15.3134 to -4.5306 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1182 to 85.3598 deg, Dec -15.3134 to -4.5306 deg
Loaded 8288 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6083 out of 7030 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7030 out of 68251 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
1.8 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
2.5 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
2.5 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
15.4 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1lpYPxopFS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=4033, bad_region=3, passed=65128
Got 65128 stars (including 61014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1291 n_q2=1207 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1114 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XRPTbamFrh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=3880, bad_region=3, passed=68218
Got 68218 stars (including 64240 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68218 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1296 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1268 n_q4=1102 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.465
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uGqkW5oM97 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2884, bad_region=27, passed=53031
Got 53031 stars (including 50038 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=9.875 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.700 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.358 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.294 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=0.757 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.251 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.295 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.294
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.295 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1094 n_q2=1196 n_q3=1255 n_q4=1336 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GpL36bU9kU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2609, bad_region=29, passed=53058
Got 53058 stars (including 50341 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53058 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=9.909 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.827 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.368 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.384 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.265 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.304 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=0.769 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.265 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.308 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.304
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.308 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1085 n_q2=1196 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1338 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0495.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_055023_TTUQ1b1x1_1530266_1rS2r4tb/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:50:08.83 -04:57:23.8: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:11:22.62 -09:57:33.8: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:43:35.00 -11:32:44.0: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:41:32.31 -06:12:53.0: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:35:46.67 -05:22:26.6: 12.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:29:00.14 -11:24:14.2: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:50:08.83 -04:57:23.8: 15.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:41:32.31 -06:12:53.0: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:11:22.62 -09:57:33.8: 14.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:08.83 -04:57:23.8: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5369 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:32.31 -06:12:53.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4722 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:22.62 -09:57:33.8: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5527 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:43:35.00 -11:32:44.0: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:35.00 -11:32:44.0: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2949 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:01:53.31 -12:54:10.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:24:24.17 -10:22:09.3: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:29:00.14 -11:24:14.2: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:00.14 -11:24:14.2: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6944 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:35:46.67 -05:22:26.6: 13.02 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:46.67 -05:22:26.6: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.6053 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:01:53.31 -12:54:10.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:24:24.17 -10:22:09.3: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:24.17 -10:22:09.3: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2089 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:13:51.08 -06:44:10.1: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:07:29.58 -08:40:25.8: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:29:50.76 -09:57:20.7: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:33:04.36 -05:19:41.7: 13.88 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:26:40.51 -09:24:06.2: 14.01 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:54:03.15 -09:53:58.5: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:07:29.58 -08:40:25.8: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:29:50.76 -09:57:20.7: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:29.58 -08:40:25.8: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6018 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:13:51.08 -06:44:10.1: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:50.76 -09:57:20.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7265 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:51.08 -06:44:10.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4649 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:35:06.13 -05:45:31.8: 15.09 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:16:53.53 -05:29:05.7: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:33:04.36 -05:19:41.7: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:26:40.51 -09:24:06.2: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:04.36 -05:19:41.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7767 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:40.51 -09:24:06.2: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8844 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:54:03.15 -09:53:58.5: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:03.15 -09:53:58.5: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1493 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:35:06.13 -05:45:31.8: 14.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:35:06.13 -05:45:31.8: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.0809 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:16:53.53 -05:29:05.7: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:53.53 -05:29:05.7: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9905 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:34:48.24 -05:37:23.1: 14.29 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:36:29.91 -05:20:07.5: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:44:16.99 -05:12:42.4: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:38:58.06 -10:06:03.9: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:57:05.61 -08:50:18.4: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:46:05.16 -07:01:08.1: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:34:48.24 -05:37:23.1: 14.41 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:48.24 -05:37:23.1: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1755 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:53:03.37 -05:31:05.7: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:36:29.91 -05:20:07.5: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:29.91 -05:20:07.5: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4180 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:42:27.78 -06:47:50.8: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:44:16.99 -05:12:42.4: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:38:58.06 -10:06:03.9: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:16.99 -05:12:42.4: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5840 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:58.06 -10:06:03.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3340 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:57:05.61 -08:50:18.4: 14.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:46:05.16 -07:01:08.1: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:05.61 -08:50:18.4: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5145 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:05.16 -07:01:08.1: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6788 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:53:03.37 -05:31:05.7: 15.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:03.37 -05:31:05.7: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6431 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:42:27.78 -06:47:50.8: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:27.78 -06:47:50.8: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6331 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:30:15.21 -05:50:18.3: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:38:57.67 -11:47:14.8: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:48:23.66 -10:23:29.6: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:46:38.44 -07:15:44.9: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:39:15.84 -08:15:03.7: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:49:02.40 -06:31:27.5: 15.06 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:30:15.21 -05:50:18.3: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:15.21 -05:50:18.3: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5905 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:55:51.59 -07:50:27.9: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:38:57.67 -11:47:14.8: 15.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:57.67 -11:47:14.8: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5987 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:51:42.51 -10:12:37.9: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:48:23.66 -10:23:29.6: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:23.66 -10:23:29.6: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6760 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:46:38.44 -07:15:44.9: 15.28 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:38.44 -07:15:44.9: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6949 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:39:15.84 -08:15:03.7: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:49:02.40 -06:31:27.5: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:15.84 -08:15:03.7: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6220 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:02.40 -06:31:27.5: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8253 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:55:51.59 -07:50:27.9: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:51.59 -07:50:27.9: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7032 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:51:42.51 -10:12:37.9: 15.40 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:42.51 -10:12:37.9: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7282 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:11:53.48 -08:14:27.6: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:11:53.48 -08:14:27.6: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:53.48 -08:14:27.6: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7773 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out83514.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82666.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82068_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82068_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82077_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82077_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82078_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82078_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82079_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82079_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82080_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82080_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:21.91 -09:27:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82086_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82086_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82090_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82090_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:04.09 -07:03:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82093_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82093_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:23.38 -08:47:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82098_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82098_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:18.29 -13:50:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82099_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82099_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:37.50 -06:51:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82100_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82100_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:27.74 -07:59:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82102_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82102_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:05.67 -07:54:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82105_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82105_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:35.25 -15:13:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82565_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82565_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82592_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82592_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:46.09 -08:24:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82607_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82607_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82666_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
Preparing report for the candidate 82666_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82740_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82740_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:45.87 -05:58:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82747_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82747_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:22.80 -10:39:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82794_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82794_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82856_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82856_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:53.85 -06:06:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82907_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82907_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:02.97 -05:30:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82952_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 82952_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83050_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83050_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:37.77 -05:41:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83071_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83071_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83134_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83134_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83237_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83237_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:08.81 -10:20:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83259_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83259_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:38.69 -08:21:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83306_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83306_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83437_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83437_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83450_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83450_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:00.58 -11:37:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83489_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83489_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:44.06 -07:51:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83509_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83509_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83514_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83514_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:06.13 -05:45:31.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.684 3017246071978064512 083.77564725543 -05.75867489014 14.3144 13.3660 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.684#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83541_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83541_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83613_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83613_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:39.26 -12:13:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83677_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83677_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:57.36 -10:01:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83682_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83682_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83748_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83748_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:12.75 -11:30:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83788_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83788_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:32.98 -06:18:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83812_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83812_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83847_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83847_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83896_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83896_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83950_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83950_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83982_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83982_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83985_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83985_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83990_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 83990_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84008_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 84008_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84013_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 84013_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84015_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 84015_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84026_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 84026_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84049_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 84049_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84060_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 84060_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84070_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 84070_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84111_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 84111_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84126_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 84126_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53894_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 53894_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:56.48 -13:04:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39103_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 39103_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:20.72 -10:37:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43440_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496
The candidate 43440_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-49-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0496 did not pass the final checks