This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4340 2461301.9340 10.80 05:17:03.20 +00:16:15.3
201.41443 -20.73774 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J051703+0016.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.810 V Y 0.350 V 2452294.20000 81.000000000000 M5/6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:17:03.20 +00:16:15.3: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:17:03.20 +00:16:15.3: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.4340* 05 17 03.20 +00 16 15.3 10.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J051703+0016.2,2461301.9340,10.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J051703+0016.2 20260918.4340 10.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4340 2461301.9340 14.27 05:06:13.12 -04:08:08.1
204.19814 -25.22996 galactic Eri Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" AQ Eri
Type: UGSU
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.500 V 17.800 V 0.060940000000 pec(UG)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:06:13.12 -04:08:08.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:06:13.12 -04:08:08.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.4340* 05 06 13.12 -04 08 08.1 14.3 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AQ Eri,2461301.9340,14.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AQ Eri 20260918.4340 14.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4340 2461301.9340 13.47 05:12:43.24 -01:28:36.9
202.49078 -22.53414 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J051243.28-012836.0
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.600 V 15.170 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:12:43.24 -01:28:36.9: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:12:43.24 -01:28:36.9: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.4340* 05 12 43.24 -01 28 36.9 13.5 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J051243.28-012836.0,2461301.9340,13.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J051243.28-012836.0 20260918.4340 13.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68062513 09.01.2026 04:19:56.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
First image: 2461049.68062513 09.01.2026 04:19:56.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Last image: 2461301.93429885 18.09.2026 10:25:13.421 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14842
Objects passed selection criteria: 14832
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14049
Average stars matched: 13602.2 (96.8201 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240432 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 05:30:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68062513 09.01.2026 04:19:56.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
First image: 2461049.68062513 09.01.2026 04:19:56.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Last image: 2461301.93429885 18.09.2026 10:25:13.421 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 80
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 84143
Objects passed selection criteria: 83950
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 77385.8
Average stars matched: 75013.2 (96.9342 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 578720 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 05:32:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461301.93361105
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:40.804 -01:58:40.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:38.592 -02:01:12.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:40.804 -01:58:40.82
Second-epoch image center 05:08:38.592 -02:01:12.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0433 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:37.660 -02:00:39.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:40.804 -01:58:40.82
Second-epoch image center 05:08:37.660 -02:00:39.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0356 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:38.592 -02:01:12.96
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:37.660 -02:00:39.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00997 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SFT9LGo465
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JVtI2Zzatn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p1fdlJMaIl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X9aJqXALQh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14462 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2579 to 85.1125 deg, Dec -7.2867 to +3.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2579 to 85.1125 deg, Dec -7.2867 to 3.3458 deg
Loaded 9341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7410 out of 7991 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7991 out of 14462 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.914450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.914450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14462 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2579 to 85.1125 deg, Dec -7.2867 to +3.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2579 to 85.1125 deg, Dec -7.2867 to 3.3458 deg
Loaded 9341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7410 out of 7991 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7991 out of 14462 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 14502 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2668 to 85.1125 deg, Dec -7.2839 to +3.3517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2668 to 85.1125 deg, Dec -7.2839 to 3.3517 deg
Loaded 9336 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7412 out of 7981 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7981 out of 14502 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
2.1 pix Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
15.3 mag. Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.SFT9LGo465 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1502, bad_region=0, passed=14462
Got 14462 stars (including 12945 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14462 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4840 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits N_match=4840 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1034 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1067 n_q4=1572 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.416
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JVtI2Zzatn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1458, bad_region=0, passed=14500
Got 14500 stars (including 13020 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14500 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4840 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits N_match=4840 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1037 n_q2=1174 n_q3=1068 n_q4=1561 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.333
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.p1fdlJMaIl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=988, bad_region=0, passed=13831
Got 13831 stars (including 12825 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13831 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13831 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13831 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13831 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4841 stars left (next iteration limit 5325)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=9.580 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.138 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.363 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.325 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4841 robust_rms_before=0.770 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.267 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.331 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.325
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.331 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits N_match=4841 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1095 n_q2=1145 n_q3=1086 n_q4=1515 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.X9aJqXALQh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=981, bad_region=0, passed=13807
Got 13807 stars (including 12814 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13807 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4839 stars left (next iteration limit 5322)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4839 robust_rms=9.492 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.249 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4839 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.379 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4839 robust_rms=0.267 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.317 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4839 robust_rms_before=0.790 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.282 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.267 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.336 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.317
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.336 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits N_match=4839 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=1094 n_q2=1148 n_q3=1087 n_q4=1510 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits sigma_overall=0.300 worst_q_ratio=1.416
ref2=Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.333
new1=fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.203
new2=fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits sigma_overall=0.292 worst_q_ratio=1.176
reference average sigma_overall=0.2945 worst_q_ratio=1.3745
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149_astrometric_residuals.png (4840 matched stars from wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150_astrometric_residuals.png (4840 matched stars from wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (4841 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474_astrometric_residuals.png (4839 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:05:26.15 -01:24:38.3: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:05:16.32 -02:39:31.2: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:56:57.88 -02:42:53.7: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:11:36.51 -02:22:48.2: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:04:17.15 -02:42:20.8: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:39:16.90 -03:14:48.5: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:10:19.82 -02:33:17.6: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:22:47.23 -00:29:14.4: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:55:50.28 -03:18:20.5: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:35:03.31 -04:49:22.2: 12.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:04:17.15 -02:42:20.8: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:10:19.82 -02:33:17.6: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:05:26.15 -01:24:38.3: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:39:16.90 -03:14:48.5: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:11:36.51 -02:22:48.2: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:05:16.32 -02:39:31.2: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:56:57.88 -02:42:53.7: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:17.15 -02:42:20.8: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1119 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:19.82 -02:33:17.6: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1469 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:26.15 -01:24:38.3: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2236 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:16.90 -03:14:48.5: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1866 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:16.32 -02:39:31.2: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0061 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:36.51 -02:22:48.2: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0856 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:57.88 -02:42:53.7: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0625 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:55:50.28 -03:18:20.5: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:50.28 -03:18:20.5: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2428 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:35:03.31 -04:49:22.2: 12.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:03.31 -04:49:22.2: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2475 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:22:47.23 -00:29:14.4: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:47.23 -00:29:14.4: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2022 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:17:03.20 +00:16:15.3: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:17:03.20 +00:16:15.3: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:17:03.20 +00:16:15.3: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8036 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09624.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20880_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20880_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:26.35 -05:25:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20888_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20888_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:31.11 -05:25:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20981_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 20981_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:34.57 -02:22:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21167_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 21167_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21179_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 21179_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21193_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 21193_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21199_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 21199_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21203_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 21203_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21213_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 21213_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21225_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 21225_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21227_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 21227_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21229_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 21229_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21257_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 21257_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09624_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
Preparing report for the candidate 09624_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02874_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 02874_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:00.70 -04:41:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ori-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:17:03.20 +00:16:15.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:40.804 -01:58:40.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:38.592 -02:01:12.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:40.804 -01:58:40.82
Second-epoch image center 05:08:38.592 -02:01:12.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0433 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:37.660 -02:00:39.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:40.804 -01:58:40.82
Second-epoch image center 05:08:37.660 -02:00:39.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0356 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:38.592 -02:01:12.96
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:37.660 -02:00:39.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00997 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.04Z63BIWY2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.soGMnR7CJi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tpaHrae4Kn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oDOxYqMSyD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 88009 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2553 to 85.1209 deg, Dec -7.2903 to +3.3492 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2553 to 85.1209 deg, Dec -7.2903 to 3.3492 deg
Loaded 9351 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6693 out of 8153 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8153 out of 88009 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.793300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.793300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 88009 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2553 to 85.1209 deg, Dec -7.2903 to +3.3492 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2553 to 85.1209 deg, Dec -7.2903 to 3.3492 deg
Loaded 9351 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6693 out of 8153 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8153 out of 88009 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 87280 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2650 to 85.1364 deg, Dec -7.2838 to +3.3548 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2650 to 85.1364 deg, Dec -7.2838 to 3.3548 deg
Loaded 9349 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6671 out of 8129 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8129 out of 87280 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 76 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
1.9 pix Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.7 pix fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
2.7 pix fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
15.5 mag. Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.04Z63BIWY2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=34, blended=6760, bad_region=5, passed=87975
Got 87975 stars (including 81061 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4846 stars left (next iteration limit 5330)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits N_match=4846 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1049 n_q2=1179 n_q3=1077 n_q4=1541 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.334
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.soGMnR7CJi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=6799, bad_region=6, passed=87254
Got 87254 stars (including 80312 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1069 n_q2=1191 n_q3=1069 n_q4=1515 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.334
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tpaHrae4Kn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4330, bad_region=32, passed=67955
Got 67955 stars (including 63502 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67955 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4841 stars left (next iteration limit 5325)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=10.141 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.417 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.335 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.372 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.256 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4841 robust_rms_before=0.758 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.256 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.345 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.329
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.345 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits N_match=4841 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1107 n_q2=1137 n_q3=1100 n_q4=1497 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.oDOxYqMSyD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=4351, bad_region=36, passed=68505
Got 68505 stars (including 64038 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68505 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=10.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.297 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=0.351 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=0.265 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.321 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4838 robust_rms_before=0.778 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.283 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.265 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.344 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.321
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.344 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1108 n_q2=1131 n_q3=1102 n_q4=1497 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-24-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0473.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052820_TTUQ1b1x1_225551_62OREAD5/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:34:23.48 +02:10:59.3: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:36:48.57 +02:17:52.9: 15.18 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:40:02.84 +02:23:55.7: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:22:15.60 +00:24:19.2: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:48:14.66 +01:46:15.8: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:59:18.42 -00:16:39.2: 14.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:20:34.74 -00:53:08.2: 15.28 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:11:33.06 -00:49:13.5: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:28:50.35 -02:05:44.9: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:20:34.74 -00:53:08.2: 15.55 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:22:15.60 +00:24:19.2: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:11:33.06 -00:49:13.5: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:59:18.42 -00:16:39.2: 14.98 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:48:14.66 +01:46:15.8: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:34:23.48 +02:10:59.3: 14.59 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:28:50.35 -02:05:44.9: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:40:02.84 +02:23:55.7: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:36:48.57 +02:17:52.9: 14.80 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:34.74 -00:53:08.2: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7876 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:59:18.42 -00:16:39.2: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5876 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:33.06 -00:49:13.5: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1130 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:15.60 +00:24:19.2: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9912 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:50.35 -02:05:44.9: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1691 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:14.66 +01:46:15.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1625 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:02.84 +02:23:55.7: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3463 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:23.48 +02:10:59.3: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6147 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:48.57 +02:17:52.9: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7032 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:30:10.54 -04:29:26.2: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:30:10.54 -04:29:26.2: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:10.54 -04:29:26.2: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5361 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:14:20.93 +01:51:51.4: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:38:55.78 +00:31:33.6: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:33:24.41 +00:36:14.5: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:59:23.71 +01:07:48.0: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:34:55.80 -00:48:32.2: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:14:20.93 +01:51:51.4: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:20.93 +01:51:51.4: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6052 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:20:56.03 -06:23:29.5: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:23:16.82 -03:06:30.9: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:35:09.11 -03:41:44.2: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:35:21.71 -05:34:49.0: 14.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:35:48.96 -00:58:20.3: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:38:55.78 +00:31:33.6: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:33:24.41 +00:36:14.5: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:59:23.71 +01:07:48.0: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:24.41 +00:36:14.5: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4592 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:55.78 +00:31:33.6: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5663 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:34:55.80 -00:48:32.2: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:59:23.71 +01:07:48.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7111 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:55.80 -00:48:32.2: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1222 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:20:56.03 -06:23:29.5: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:56.03 -06:23:29.5: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6957 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:23:16.82 -03:06:30.9: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:35:21.71 -05:34:49.0: 13.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:35:09.11 -03:41:44.2: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:35:48.96 -00:58:20.3: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:16.82 -03:06:30.9: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6687 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:21.71 -05:34:49.0: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5974 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:09.11 -03:41:44.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8014 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:48.96 -00:58:20.3: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8489 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:34:10.68 +00:25:35.9: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:10:37.36 +00:45:57.1: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:58:49.17 -00:13:31.4: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:23:00.59 +01:16:53.5: 14.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:30:30.77 +00:38:36.8: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:34:10.68 +00:25:35.9: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:10.68 +00:25:35.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0026 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:14:58.24 -00:18:16.2: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:16:39.59 +01:23:22.2: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:53:20.44 -03:49:02.7: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:39:55.56 -04:06:53.9: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:10:37.36 +00:45:57.1: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:37.36 +00:45:57.1: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9859 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:23:00.59 +01:16:53.5: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:58:49.17 -00:13:31.4: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:30:30.77 +00:38:36.8: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:00.59 +01:16:53.5: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0077 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:49.17 -00:13:31.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0782 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:30.77 +00:38:36.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9261 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:53:20.44 -03:49:02.7: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:14:58.24 -00:18:16.2: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:16:39.59 +01:23:22.2: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:39:55.56 -04:06:53.9: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:20.44 -03:49:02.7: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1221 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:58.24 -00:18:16.2: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0383 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:39.59 +01:23:22.2: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1699 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:55.56 -04:06:53.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9901 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:08:52.19 -01:14:52.4: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:13:23.42 -04:39:23.6: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:19:37.12 -04:52:44.8: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:15:15.81 +01:50:55.7: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:56:54.39 +01:32:08.2: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:08:52.19 -01:14:52.4: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:52.19 -01:14:52.4: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0828 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:13:23.42 -04:39:23.6: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:23.42 -04:39:23.6: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0619 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:41:37.51 -05:30:11.0: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:06:13.12 -04:08:08.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:20:29.75 -03:59:20.6: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:25:15.31 +02:29:18.1: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:19:37.12 -04:52:44.8: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:15:15.81 +01:50:55.7: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:56:54.39 +01:32:08.2: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:37.12 -04:52:44.8: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8678 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:15.81 +01:50:55.7: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0937 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:54.39 +01:32:08.2: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2291 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:06:13.12 -04:08:08.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:41:37.51 -05:30:11.0: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:25:15.31 +02:29:18.1: 14.34 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:20:29.75 -03:59:20.6: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:37.51 -05:30:11.0: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2006 delta=-1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:29.75 -03:59:20.6: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1042 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:15.31 +02:29:18.1: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4261 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:49:49.79 -02:28:36.5: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:31:00.59 +02:09:15.6: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:34:08.53 -01:31:33.0: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:32:33.56 -01:50:17.8: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:25:00.93 +00:56:05.4: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:21:40.80 +02:01:34.4: 15.56 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:49:49.79 -02:28:36.5: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:49.79 -02:28:36.5: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6433 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:31:00.59 +02:09:15.6: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:00.59 +02:09:15.6: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4845 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:34:08.53 -01:31:33.0: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:08.53 -01:31:33.0: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5622 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:14:45.06 +02:02:21.3: 15.11 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:34:56.62 -00:49:55.9: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:27:53.26 +01:25:51.6: 15.36 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:32:33.56 -01:50:17.8: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:25:00.93 +00:56:05.4: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:21:40.80 +02:01:34.4: 15.40 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:33.56 -01:50:17.8: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6222 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:00.93 +00:56:05.4: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7798 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:21:40.80 +02:01:34.4: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7680 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:27:53.26 +01:25:51.6: 15.55 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:14:45.06 +02:02:21.3: 15.14 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:34:56.62 -00:49:55.9: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:53.26 +01:25:51.6: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8392 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:45.06 +02:02:21.3: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7084 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:56.62 -00:49:55.9: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4120 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:32:11.43 -01:23:59.7: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:39:52.40 -00:04:50.8: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:02:25.72 +00:48:52.1: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:32:11.43 -01:23:59.7: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:11.43 -01:23:59.7: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7461 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:12:43.24 -01:28:36.9: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:39:52.40 -00:04:50.8: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:02:25.72 +00:48:52.1: 14.85 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:52.40 -00:04:50.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7100 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:25.72 +00:48:52.1: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8075 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:12:43.24 -01:28:36.9: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:12:43.24 -01:28:36.9: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4694 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106092.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43724.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104441_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104441_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104443_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104443_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104446_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104446_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104454_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104454_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104460_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104460_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:42.60 +01:41:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104464_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104464_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104469_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104469_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104472_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104472_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104473_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104473_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104481_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104481_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104484_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104484_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:05.94 -05:10:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104488_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104488_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104489_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104489_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104596_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104596_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:34.59 -02:22:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104646_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104646_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:22.80 -02:25:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104912_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104912_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.25 +02:02:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104997_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 104997_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:27.77 +01:56:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105024_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105024_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:56.50 -00:33:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105113_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105113_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:45.97 -02:04:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105140_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105140_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:53.85 -06:06:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105158_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105158_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:43.10 +00:29:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105230_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105230_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105255_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105255_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:55.74 -06:15:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105280_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105280_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:58.21 +01:36:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105388_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105388_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105449_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105449_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105459_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105459_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:48.90 +01:46:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105493_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105493_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105512_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105512_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105614_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105614_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105632_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105632_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105654_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105654_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105732_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105732_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105781_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105781_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105812_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105812_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105816_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105816_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105820_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105820_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105832_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105832_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105849_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105849_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105859_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105859_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:51.59 +01:10:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105862_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105862_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105884_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105884_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105900_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105900_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105901_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105901_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105902_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105902_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:29.03 +01:56:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105908_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105908_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105961_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105961_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105981_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105981_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105992_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 105992_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106013_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106013_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106063_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106063_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:51.99 +02:06:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106089_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106089_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106092_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
Preparing report for the candidate 106092_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106104_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106104_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106184_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106184_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:25.99 +01:58:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106270_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106270_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106311_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106311_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:08.30 +02:23:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106389_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106389_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106399_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106399_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106427_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106427_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106435_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106435_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106443_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106443_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106459_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106459_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106478_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106478_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106482_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106482_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106511_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106511_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106528_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106528_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106531_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106531_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106557_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 106557_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82812_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 82812_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:03.20 +00:16:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03578_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 03578_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:15.69 -06:36:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43724_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
Preparing report for the candidate 43724_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02395_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 02395_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:24.05 -06:55:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15970_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 15970_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:00.69 -04:41:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56090_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 56090_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80600_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474
The candidate 80600_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_05-25-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474 did not pass the final checks