This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4102 2461301.9102 13.36 04:04:36.60 +17:54:55.6
174.56091 -25.03362 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -0 -0 0 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:04:36.60 +17:54:55.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:04:36.60 +17:54:55.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.4102* 04 04 36.60 +17 54 55.6 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.9102,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.4102 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4102 2461301.9102 14.54 04:20:36.05 +17:40:19.0
177.52070 -22.34953 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1171 Rusthawelia -0 -1 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:20:36.05 +17:40:19.0: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:20:36.05 +17:40:19.0: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.4102* 04 20 36.05 +17 40 19.0 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.9102,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.4102 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4102 2461301.9102 14.62 03:59:19.64 +14:58:13.2
176.01938 -27.96187 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.742 Edisona -1 -0 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:59:19.64 +14:58:13.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:59:19.64 +14:58:13.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.4102* 03 59 19.64 +14 58 13.2 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.9102,14.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.4102 14.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.4102 2461301.9102 14.71 03:57:01.27 +11:58:35.2
178.13232 -30.38572 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.655 Briseis -1 -0 1 14.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:01.27 +11:58:35.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:01.27 +11:58:35.2: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.4102* 03 57 01.27 +11 58 35.2 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.9102,14.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.4102 14.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461301.91052764 18.09.2026 09:50:59.588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 20
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9668
Objects passed selection criteria: 9664
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9114
Average stars matched: 8828.75 (96.8702 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235996 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 04:54:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461301.91052764 18.09.2026 09:50:59.588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 88
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 58747
Objects passed selection criteria: 58595
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 54954.2
Average stars matched: 53275.5 (96.9452 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 277256 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 04:55:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461301.90984442
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:40.818 +13:59:51.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.818 +13:59:51.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0045 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:44.040 +13:59:46.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:44.040 +13:59:46.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0173 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:40.818 +13:59:51.31
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:44.040 +13:59:46.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01311 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VCKPk1QjTt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gltPgqqeD8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits &> /tmp/tmp.udA1x3zsGB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7SPiMquJt9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec +8.6216 to +19.2870 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec 8.6216 to 19.2870 deg
Loaded 4407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3650 out of 8488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 20 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.VCKPk1QjTt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=0, passed=9344
Got 9344 stars (including 8597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1309 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1429 n_q4=1041 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gltPgqqeD8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1, passed=8488
Got 8488 stars (including 7793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1282 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1405 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.472
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.udA1x3zsGB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=508, bad_region=0, passed=9415
Got 9415 stars (including 8895 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=11.844 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.724 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.271 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.327 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=1.240 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.288 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.271 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.339 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.327
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.339 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1064 n_q2=1372 n_q3=1154 n_q4=1285 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7SPiMquJt9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=513, bad_region=0, passed=9473
Got 9473 stars (including 8948 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=11.920 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.961 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.401 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.332 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4872 robust_rms_before=1.265 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.299 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.350 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.332
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.350 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=1067 n_q2=1369 n_q3=1148 n_q4=1288 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.263
ref2=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.472
new1=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.158
new2=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.179
reference average sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.3675
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438_astrometric_residuals.png (4872 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:47:46.11 +11:13:30.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:31.09 +15:35:14.7: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:30:18.46 +14:34:59.7: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:37:10.36 +12:12:47.1: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:31.61 +16:29:05.7: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:38.71 +11:19:31.5: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:35.66 +15:49:48.5: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:33:50.13 +13:06:46.2: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:57.80 +15:19:05.0: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:11.70 +13:18:26.9: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:47:46.11 +11:13:30.8: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:35.66 +15:49:48.5: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:38.71 +11:19:31.5: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:37:10.36 +12:12:47.1: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:11.70 +13:18:26.9: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:31.61 +16:29:05.7: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:31.09 +15:35:14.7: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:33:50.13 +13:06:46.2: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:30:18.46 +14:34:59.7: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.46 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:57.80 +15:19:05.0: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.71 +11:19:31.5: ref_mag=11.46 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8211 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:10.36 +12:12:47.1: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3770 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:35.66 +15:49:48.5: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4529 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:46.11 +11:13:30.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4745 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:31.09 +15:35:14.7: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1788 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:31.61 +16:29:05.7: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3591 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:11.70 +13:18:26.9: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2347 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:50.13 +13:06:46.2: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4313 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:18.46 +14:34:59.7: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4556 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:57.80 +15:19:05.0: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3926 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:57.45 +14:22:48.4: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:31.46 +13:55:47.9: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:19:17.47 +11:38:50.9: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:34.76 +16:34:00.3: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:22:15.73 +14:20:52.3: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:57.45 +14:22:48.4: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:31.46 +13:55:47.9: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:19:17.47 +11:38:50.9: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:22:15.73 +14:20:52.3: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:34.76 +16:34:00.3: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:57.45 +14:22:48.4: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4792 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:15.73 +14:20:52.3: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4902 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:17.47 +11:38:50.9: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5023 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:31.46 +13:55:47.9: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4813 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:34.76 +16:34:00.3: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4897 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20180_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20180_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20372_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20372_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20383_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20383_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20401_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20401_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20405_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20405_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20407_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20407_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20419_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20419_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20423_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20423_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20425_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20425_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20427_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20427_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20429_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20429_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20433_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20433_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20434_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20434_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20435_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20435_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20436_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20436_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20437_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 20437_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:00.07 +12:20:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04086_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 04086_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.96 +14:32:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:27.21 +16:33:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.69 +09:56:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.27 +17:32:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:40.818 +13:59:51.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.818 +13:59:51.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0045 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:44.040 +13:59:46.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:44.040 +13:59:46.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0173 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:40.818 +13:59:51.31
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:44.040 +13:59:46.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01311 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FEtlsIIh4R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o00ntnljJ2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aofLOs7ngR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits &> /tmp/tmp.REUgQ9qPpb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec +8.6064 to +19.2869 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec 8.6064 to 19.2869 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3131 out of 3673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3673 out of 58309 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 75 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
1.8 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FEtlsIIh4R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3506, bad_region=5, passed=62251
Got 62251 stars (including 58597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1302 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1432 n_q4=1060 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.o00ntnljJ2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3080, bad_region=5, passed=58299
Got 58299 stars (including 55093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58299 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.235 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1129 n_q3=1416 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.486
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aofLOs7ngR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=2390, bad_region=42, passed=50248
Got 50248 stars (including 47728 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50248 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=12.994 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.459 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.387 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.272 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.338 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=1.229 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.283 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.272 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.326 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.338
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.326 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1084 n_q2=1363 n_q3=1143 n_q4=1284 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.REUgQ9qPpb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2413, bad_region=45, passed=50746
Got 50746 stars (including 48203 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50746 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=12.882 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.508 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.381 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.406 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.338 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=1.254 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.299 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.341 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.338
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.341 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1086 n_q2=1367 n_q3=1145 n_q4=1281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045218_TTUQ1b1x1_2592318_nlUwHubP/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:59:09.63 +13:13:07.8: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:52.23 +14:39:27.9: 14.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:44.55 +12:30:33.8: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:10:07.14 +09:49:03.0: 14.66 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:06:10.08 +14:48:37.7: 14.97 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:37.81 +13:31:18.4: 14.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:15:41.68 +18:37:41.1: 15.58 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:52.14 +12:20:44.6: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:20:39.23 +14:38:38.3: 15.01 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:21.44 +11:48:38.1: 15.19 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:06:10.08 +14:48:37.7: 14.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:59:09.63 +13:13:07.8: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:52.23 +14:39:27.9: 15.38 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:44.55 +12:30:33.8: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:15:41.68 +18:37:41.1: 15.73 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:37.81 +13:31:18.4: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:52.14 +12:20:44.6: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:20:39.23 +14:38:38.3: 14.95 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:21.44 +11:48:38.1: 15.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:10:07.14 +09:49:03.0: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.64 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:52.23 +14:39:27.9: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9134 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:10.08 +14:48:37.7: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8393 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:44.55 +12:30:33.8: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9702 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:09.63 +13:13:07.8: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2588 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:41.68 +18:37:41.1: ref_mag=15.64 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1759 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:52.14 +12:20:44.6: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3468 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:37.81 +13:31:18.4: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0863 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:21.44 +11:48:38.1: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1176 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:39.23 +14:38:38.3: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7709 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:07.14 +09:49:03.0: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4771 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:31.39 +14:25:59.4: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:28.33 +18:01:06.7: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:35.52 +17:25:28.7: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:38.78 +11:19:32.7: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:04:36.60 +17:54:55.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:39:11.27 +17:52:55.8: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:51:49.07 +13:37:43.3: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:55:02.29 +14:08:57.0: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:31.39 +14:25:59.4: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:31.39 +14:25:59.4: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8099 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:39:11.27 +17:52:55.8: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:28.33 +18:01:06.7: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:04:36.60 +17:54:55.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:35.52 +17:25:28.7: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:38.78 +11:19:32.7: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:28.33 +18:01:06.7: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9054 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:11.27 +17:52:55.8: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7220 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:35.52 +17:25:28.7: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5366 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.78 +11:19:32.7: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8075 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:33.30 +13:55:03.0: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:32:52.24 +18:55:04.3: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:51:49.07 +13:37:43.3: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:49.07 +13:37:43.3: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7833 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:55:02.29 +14:08:57.0: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:02.29 +14:08:57.0: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1947 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:32:52.24 +18:55:04.3: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:33.30 +13:55:03.0: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:52.24 +18:55:04.3: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4816 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:33.30 +13:55:03.0: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4077 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:20:36.05 +17:40:19.0: 16.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:40:59.13 +18:07:08.8: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:59:19.64 +14:58:13.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:01:42.22 +14:07:24.9: 15.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:01.27 +11:58:35.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:00:19.80 +14:53:06.7: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:23:38.02 +17:02:41.0: 14.72 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:20:36.05 +17:40:19.0: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:40:59.13 +18:07:08.8: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:59:19.64 +14:58:13.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:59.13 +18:07:08.8: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4376 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:01:42.22 +14:07:24.9: 15.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:01.27 +11:58:35.2: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:42.22 +14:07:24.9: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8210 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:20.67 +15:14:05.3: 15.29 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:53.85 +13:04:22.3: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:00:19.80 +14:53:06.7: 15.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:19.80 +14:53:06.7: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7663 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:23:38.02 +17:02:41.0: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:38.02 +17:02:41.0: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7417 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:53.85 +13:04:22.3: 15.40 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:20.67 +15:14:05.3: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:53.85 +13:04:22.3: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8938 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:20.67 +15:14:05.3: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8318 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:59:54.44 +18:22:20.8: 15.45 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:55:36.62 +16:08:16.6: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:01:08.84 +18:49:51.5: 15.38 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:03.59 +18:46:27.4: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:59:54.44 +18:22:20.8: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:55:36.62 +16:08:16.6: 15.34 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:54.44 +18:22:20.8: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0002 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:36.62 +16:08:16.6: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9510 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:55:48.29 +14:13:31.6: 15.14 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:29.51 +17:56:06.5: 15.27 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:01:08.84 +18:49:51.5: 15.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:08.84 +18:49:51.5: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0474 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:03.59 +18:46:27.4: 15.14 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:03.59 +18:46:27.4: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0111 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:55:48.29 +14:13:31.6: 15.19 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:29.51 +17:56:06.5: 15.37 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:48.29 +14:13:31.6: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8601 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:29.51 +17:56:06.5: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9625 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:43.43 +16:22:07.1: 15.48 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:34:36.91 +10:42:43.1: 15.34 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:07:47.86 +10:27:34.5: 15.49 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:59:08.01 +15:18:05.4: 15.46 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:43.43 +16:22:07.1: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:34:36.91 +10:42:43.1: 15.46 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:43.43 +16:22:07.1: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8607 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:36.91 +10:42:43.1: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8876 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:06:53.86 +18:23:55.4: 15.61 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:07:47.86 +10:27:34.5: 15.36 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:47.86 +10:27:34.5: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9477 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:59:08.01 +15:18:05.4: 15.34 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:08.01 +15:18:05.4: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0217 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:59:20.06 +14:29:20.9: 15.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:06:53.86 +18:23:55.4: 15.45 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:53.86 +18:23:55.4: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0848 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:40.56 +16:06:05.3: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:54:58.40 +14:58:21.7: 15.53 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:59:20.06 +14:29:20.9: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:20.06 +14:29:20.9: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9863 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:59:41.95 +14:23:41.0: 15.48 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:04:01.23 +13:20:44.1: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:54:58.40 +14:58:21.7: 15.25 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:40.56 +16:06:05.3: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:58.40 +14:58:21.7: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1542 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:40.56 +16:06:05.3: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8748 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:02.79 +15:11:23.7: 15.46 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:59:41.95 +14:23:41.0: 15.37 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:41.95 +14:23:41.0: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0052 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:04:01.23 +13:20:44.1: 15.20 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:01.23 +13:20:44.1: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8456 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:09.07 +13:22:52.4: 15.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:02.79 +15:11:23.7: 15.36 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:02.79 +15:11:23.7: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1120 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:06:55.63 +10:47:35.0: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:11:08.96 +13:28:08.1: 15.04 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:09.07 +13:22:52.4: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:09.07 +13:22:52.4: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0066 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:00:29.70 +14:45:29.7: 15.58 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:55:02.22 +15:01:40.1: 15.47 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:06:55.63 +10:47:35.0: 15.29 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:11:08.96 +13:28:08.1: 15.03 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:55.63 +10:47:35.0: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9919 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:08.96 +13:28:08.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9396 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:36.70 +15:10:54.4: 15.50 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:00:29.70 +14:45:29.7: 15.36 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:55:02.22 +15:01:40.1: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:29.70 +14:45:29.7: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1772 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:02.22 +15:01:40.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0859 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:34:31.41 +18:25:48.8: 15.49 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:36.70 +15:10:54.4: 15.35 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:36.70 +15:10:54.4: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0843 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:11:13.82 +16:25:41.5: 15.57 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:00:37.00 +15:55:34.0: 15.40 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:34:31.41 +18:25:48.8: 15.51 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:31.41 +18:25:48.8: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0672 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:05:47.54 +16:13:07.5: 15.47 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:39:48.22 +18:00:29.1: 15.48 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:11:13.82 +16:25:41.5: 15.54 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:00:37.00 +15:55:34.0: 15.53 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.56 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:13.82 +16:25:41.5: ref_mag=15.56 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1716 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:37.00 +15:55:34.0: ref_mag=15.45 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.2171 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:42.88 +14:10:30.6: 15.30 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:39:48.22 +18:00:29.1: 15.52 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:05:47.54 +16:13:07.5: 15.36 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:48.22 +18:00:29.1: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0089 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:47.54 +16:13:07.5: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0630 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:46.10 +16:39:48.2: 15.66 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:42.88 +14:10:30.6: 15.29 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:42.88 +14:10:30.6: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0631 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:34:28.07 +15:53:54.5: 15.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:41:38.82 +15:21:53.6: 15.39 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:46.10 +16:39:48.2: 15.55 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.60 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:46.10 +16:39:48.2: ref_mag=15.60 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.2197 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:18:22.63 +12:50:40.8: 15.20 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:45.10 +09:04:04.1: 15.30 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:34:28.07 +15:53:54.5: 15.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:41:38.82 +15:21:53.6: 15.66 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:28.07 +15:53:54.5: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1933 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.49 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:38.82 +15:21:53.6: ref_mag=15.49 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1109 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:44:09.61 +12:51:18.7: 15.91 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:18:22.63 +12:50:40.8: 15.63 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:45.10 +09:04:04.1: 15.28 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:22.63 +12:50:40.8: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0414 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:45.10 +09:04:04.1: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9704 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:44:09.61 +12:51:18.7: 15.90 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.90 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:09.61 +12:51:18.7: ref_mag=15.90 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=15.2037 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76152.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76915.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76980.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76982.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75635_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 75635_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75640_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 75640_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75644_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 75644_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75647_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 75647_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75649_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 75649_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75657_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 75657_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75658_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 75658_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75660_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 75660_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75661_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 75661_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75662_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 75662_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75664_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 75664_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76011_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76011_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.86 +18:26:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76152_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
Preparing report for the candidate 76152_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76153_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76153_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76172_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76172_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:42.03 +10:53:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:59.67 +14:06:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76306_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76306_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76377_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76377_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76397_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76397_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76434_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76434_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76482_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76482_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76592_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76592_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:34.27 +17:20:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76664_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76664_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:58.31 +10:13:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76751_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76751_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76871_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76871_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76885_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76885_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76915_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
Preparing report for the candidate 76915_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76973_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 76973_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76980_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
Preparing report for the candidate 76980_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76982_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
Preparing report for the candidate 76982_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77064_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77064_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77112_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77112_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77123_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77123_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77128_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77128_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77139_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77139_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77164_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77164_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77170_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77170_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77171_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77171_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77195_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77195_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77207_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77207_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77227_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77227_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77232_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77232_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77240_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77240_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77241_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77241_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77259_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77259_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77266_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77266_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77270_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77270_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77285_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77285_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77289_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77289_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77301_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77301_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77308_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77308_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77311_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77311_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77325_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77325_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77327_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77327_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77339_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77339_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77350_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77350_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77357_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77357_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77370_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77370_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77379_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77379_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77394_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77394_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77420_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77420_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77421_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77421_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77434_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77434_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77446_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77446_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77454_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77454_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77458_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77458_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77523_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77523_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77527_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77527_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77529_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77529_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77588_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 77588_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:18.47 +11:10:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 03602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.39 +18:37:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.27 +17:32:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438
The candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-50-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0438 did not pass the final checks