This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3989* 04 13 36.06 +21 01 46.3 7.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8989,7.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3989 7.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3989 2461301.8989 11.57 05:03:19.09 +24:33:26.0
178.35856 -10.27471 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 0 0 1 11.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:03:19.09 +24:33:26.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:03:19.09 +24:33:26.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3989* 05 03 19.09 +24 33 26.0 11.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8989,11.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3989 11.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3989 2461301.8989 12.41 04:51:10.43 +25:38:17.5
175.78757 -11.81101 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -0 -0 0 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:10.43 +25:38:17.5: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:10.43 +25:38:17.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3989* 04 51 10.43 +25 38 17.5 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8989,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3989 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3989* 04 13 36.07 +21 01 46.5 7.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8989,7.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3989 7.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3989 2461301.8989 13.32 04:04:36.24 +17:54:53.9
174.56022 -25.03499 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -1 -1 2 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:04:36.24 +17:54:53.9: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:04:36.24 +17:54:53.9: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3989* 04 04 36.24 +17 54 53.9 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8989,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3989 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3989 2461301.8989 13.45 04:08:53.74 +22:42:36.5
171.51489 -21.01564 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix -0 -0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:53.74 +22:42:36.5: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:53.74 +22:42:36.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3989* 04 08 53.74 +22 42 36.5 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8989,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3989 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3989 2461301.8989 13.52 04:38:45.36 +23:31:51.0
175.65911 -15.33139 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata 0 -1 1 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:45.36 +23:31:51.0: 16.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:45.36 +23:31:51.0: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3989* 04 38 45.36 +23 31 51.0 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8989,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3989 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3989 2461301.8989 13.56 05:02:52.13 +23:01:13.3
179.55858 -11.26606 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -0 0 0 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:02:52.13 +23:01:13.3: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:02:52.13 +23:01:13.3: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3989* 05 02 52.13 +23 01 13.3 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8989,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3989 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3989 2461301.8989 13.65 04:44:53.32 +19:27:00.3
179.90472 -16.75964 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina -0 -1 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:53.32 +19:27:00.3: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:53.32 +19:27:00.3: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3989* 04 44 53.32 +19 27 00.3 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8989,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3989 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3989 2461301.8989 13.89 04:25:32.30 +24:59:27.9
172.46789 -16.67209 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia -0 -1 1 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:32.30 +24:59:27.9: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:32.30 +24:59:27.9: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3989* 04 25 32.30 +24 59 27.9 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8989,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3989 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3989 2461301.8989 14.31 04:12:15.60 +22:38:43.9
172.13515 -20.49599 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.162 Laurentia -1 -0 1 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:12:15.60 +22:38:43.9: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:12:15.60 +22:38:43.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3989* 04 12 15.60 +22 38 43.9 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8989,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3989 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3989 2461301.8989 14.45 04:49:40.65 +25:16:16.6
175.86904 -12.30331 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia -0 -0 0 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:49:40.65 +25:16:16.6: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:49:40.65 +25:16:16.6: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3989* 04 49 40.65 +25 16 16.6 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8989,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3989 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3989 2461301.8989 14.47 04:20:35.60 +17:40:18.4
177.51958 -22.35100 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1171 Rusthawelia -1 -1 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:35.60 +17:40:18.4: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:35.60 +17:40:18.4: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3989* 04 20 35.60 +17 40 18.4 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8989,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3989 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.3989 2461301.8989 14.90 04:48:47.25 +20:58:21.6
179.23107 -15.10578 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.940 Kordula -0 -0 0 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:47.25 +20:58:21.6: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:47.25 +20:58:21.6: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.3989* 04 48 47.25 +20 58 21.6 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.8989,14.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.3989 14.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461301.89926358 18.09.2026 09:34:46.373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 35
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12357
Objects passed selection criteria: 12352
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11744.8
Average stars matched: 11356.8 (96.6964 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 238444 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 04:37:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461301.89926358 18.09.2026 09:34:46.373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 169
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 80540
Objects passed selection criteria: 80395
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 75410
Average stars matched: 73262 (97.1516 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 487856 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 04:38:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461301.89857380
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:57.283 +21:59:58.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:57.283 +21:59:58.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0077 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:54.934 +22:00:30.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:54.934 +22:00:30.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0153 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:57.283 +21:59:58.87
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:54.934 +22:00:30.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01257 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J6VU2exvCK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TakRA9PMIv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ToTJHcGGrM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4SN14KxX79
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.997400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.997400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 34 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.J6VU2exvCK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=0, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 10942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1283 n_q2=1077 n_q3=1448 n_q4=1036 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TakRA9PMIv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=0, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 10166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1107 n_q3=1409 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ToTJHcGGrM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=696, bad_region=0, passed=12100
Got 12100 stars (including 11389 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=12.614 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.295 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=0.381 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.413 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4838 robust_rms=0.303 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.351 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4838 robust_rms_before=1.091 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.303 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.400 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.351
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:57.330 +21:59:57.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 12100 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1409602.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.091 -> 0.303 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4838 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4655 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4655 pairs (4838 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4655 robust_rms=12.522 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.426 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4655 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.409 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4655 robust_rms=0.301 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.341 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4655 robust_rms_before=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.301 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.340 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.341
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.341 vs 0.340 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4655 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4655 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits N_match=4655 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=1037 n_q2=1293 n_q3=1048 n_q4=1277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4SN14KxX79 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=701, bad_region=1, passed=12159
Got 12159 stars (including 11440 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12159 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5319)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=12.796 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.333 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=0.381 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.420 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4836 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.357 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4836 robust_rms_before=1.094 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.412 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.357
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:54.978 +22:00:29.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 12159 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1409593.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.094 -> 0.298 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4836 pairs from the initial matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4653 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4653 pairs (4836 from the initial matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4653 robust_rms=12.653 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.590 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4653 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.415 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4653 robust_rms=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.350 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4653 robust_rms_before=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.345 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.350
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-quadrant 0.350 vs 0.345 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the second refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the first refit solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4653 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4653 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits N_match=4653 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=1031 n_q2=1291 n_q3=1050 n_q4=1281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.209
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.251
ref2=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.297
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.191
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.209
reference average sigma_overall=0.3275 worst_q_ratio=1.274
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419_astrometric_residuals.png (4655 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420_astrometric_residuals.png (4653 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-33-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_043533_TTUQ1b1x1_1390117_2gZS4uP3/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:59.49 +23:14:28.0: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:10.43 +25:38:17.5: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:44.30 +21:57:42.9: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:03:19.09 +24:33:26.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:43:53.26 +25:20:19.3: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:06.52 +21:14:32.9: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:11.77 +21:37:59.7: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:13.74 +21:11:51.1: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:43:53.26 +25:20:19.3: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:44.30 +21:57:42.9: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:03:19.09 +24:33:26.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:59.49 +23:14:28.0: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:10.43 +25:38:17.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:24.01 +17:53:04.3: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:53.26 +25:20:19.3: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4346 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:44.30 +21:57:42.9: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4030 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:59.49 +23:14:28.0: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5009 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:06.52 +21:14:32.9: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:06.52 +21:14:32.9: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4747 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:11.77 +21:37:59.7: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:13.74 +21:11:51.1: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:11.77 +21:37:59.7: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4838 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:13.74 +21:11:51.1: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4992 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:24.01 +17:53:04.3: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:24.01 +17:53:04.3: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5006 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:58:36.39 +22:59:50.2: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:33.64 +22:12:43.8: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:00.00 +23:58:09.6: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:52.02 +22:50:29.6: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:06.89 +21:51:25.2: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.6: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:58:36.39 +22:59:50.2: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:36.39 +22:59:50.2: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4284 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:00.00 +23:58:09.6: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:33.64 +22:12:43.8: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:00.00 +23:58:09.6: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5249 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:33.64 +22:12:43.8: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4798 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:15.07 +20:48:48.1: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:52.02 +22:50:29.6: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:52.02 +22:50:29.6: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5437 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:06.89 +21:51:25.2: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.6: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:06.89 +21:51:25.2: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5743 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:22.6: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5023 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:50.48 +22:34:37.2: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:15.07 +20:48:48.1: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:15.07 +20:48:48.1: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5490 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:55.55 +19:03:01.8: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:28.78 +23:49:06.4: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:24.79 +22:49:12.9: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:49.42 +20:34:00.2: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:53.33 +22:06:36.5: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:03.70 +21:55:13.8: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:50.48 +22:34:37.2: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:50.48 +22:34:37.2: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5364 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:55.55 +19:03:01.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:55.55 +19:03:01.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5047 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:28.78 +23:49:06.4: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:24.79 +22:49:12.9: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:24.79 +22:49:12.9: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5823 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:28.78 +23:49:06.4: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5855 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:42.18 +19:19:08.8: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:53.33 +22:06:36.5: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:49.42 +20:34:00.2: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:03.70 +21:55:13.8: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:53.33 +22:06:36.5: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5873 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:49.42 +20:34:00.2: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5819 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:03.70 +21:55:13.8: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5936 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:03:01.92 +24:47:26.6: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:42.18 +19:19:08.8: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:42.18 +19:19:08.8: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5348 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:10:33.33 +24:48:33.9: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:03:01.92 +24:47:26.6: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:01.92 +24:47:26.6: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5283 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:10:33.33 +24:48:33.9: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:33.33 +24:48:33.9: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5387 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20458.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20550.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20368_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:07.88 +26:06:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20369_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20369_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:06.07 +22:54:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20370_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20370_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.81 +24:18:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20372_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
Preparing report for the candidate 20372_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
Preparing report for the candidate 20458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20545_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20545_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20548_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20548_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:01.02 +21:09:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20550_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
Preparing report for the candidate 20550_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20551_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20551_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20553_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20553_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20557_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20557_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:54.19 +22:35:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20560_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20560_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20567_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20567_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20568_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20568_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20570_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20570_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20574_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20574_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20578_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20578_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20581_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20581_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20582_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20582_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20583_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20583_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20591_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20591_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20596_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20596_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20597_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20597_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20600_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20600_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20605_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20605_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20607_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20607_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20613_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20613_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20614_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20614_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20618_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20618_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20619_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20619_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20620_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20620_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20625_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 20625_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.45 +20:15:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101206_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101206_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101211_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101211_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101212_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101212_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101214_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101214_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101215_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101215_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101222_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101222_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101223_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101223_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101229_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101229_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101231_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101231_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101235_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101235_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101236_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101236_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101237_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101237_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101245_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101245_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101246_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101246_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:02.09 +24:43:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101250_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101250_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101251_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101251_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.76 +23:12:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101253_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101253_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:09.13 +17:33:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101256_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101256_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101257_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101257_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101258_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101258_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101259_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101259_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101261_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101261_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:52.74 +26:43:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101262_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101262_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:44.36 +25:22:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101267_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101267_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:55.89 +23:38:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101268_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101268_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:31.38 +22:04:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101269_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101269_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101270_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101270_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101272_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101272_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.82 +24:18:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101274_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
Preparing report for the candidate 101274_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101359_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101359_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:19.11 +24:33:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:10.43 +25:38:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101467_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101467_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101532_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101532_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:29.15 +22:48:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101560_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101560_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.40 +22:42:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101614_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101614_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101664_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101664_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.60 +22:56:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101667_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
Preparing report for the candidate 101667_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101686_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101686_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:24.30 +18:37:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101698_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
Preparing report for the candidate 101698_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101774_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
Preparing report for the candidate 101774_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101779_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101779_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.08 +21:45:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101785_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101785_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.88 +21:31:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101800_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101800_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:14.45 +24:06:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101804_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101804_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101819_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101819_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:33.77 +25:48:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101866_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101866_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:08.40 +20:28:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101885_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 101885_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.40 +24:25:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101888_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
Preparing report for the candidate 101888_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101919_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
Preparing report for the candidate 101919_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101932_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
Preparing report for the candidate 101932_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102032_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102032_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:03.68 +20:29:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102079_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102079_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102115_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102115_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102116_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102116_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102130_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102130_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102139_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102139_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:44.47 +21:50:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102159_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
Preparing report for the candidate 102159_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102164_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102164_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102187_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102187_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:44.81 +24:28:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102203_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102203_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102219_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102219_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102267_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102267_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102279_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102279_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:50.77 +23:37:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102281_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102281_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:38.96 +23:58:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102295_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102295_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102322_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102322_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:18.05 +23:45:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102323_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102323_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102324_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102324_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102327_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102327_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102328_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102328_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102344_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102344_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102383_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102383_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102395_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102395_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102401_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
Preparing report for the candidate 102401_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102417_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102417_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102421_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102421_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102447_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102447_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102463_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102463_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102464_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102464_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102479_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
Preparing report for the candidate 102479_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102486_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102486_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102522_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102522_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102542_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102542_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102543_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102543_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102561_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102561_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102568_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102568_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102609_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102609_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102639_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102639_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102648_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102648_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102665_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102665_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102669_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102669_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102672_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102672_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102703_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102703_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102714_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102714_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102716_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102716_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102726_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102726_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102727_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102727_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.10 +22:53:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102744_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102744_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102752_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102752_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102760_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102760_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102786_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102786_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102796_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102796_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102806_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102806_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102811_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102811_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102813_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102813_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102819_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102819_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102821_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102821_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102829_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102829_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102853_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102853_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102854_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
Preparing report for the candidate 102854_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102856_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102856_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102860_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102860_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102874_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102874_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102886_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102886_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102895_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102895_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102902_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102902_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102903_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102903_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102907_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102907_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102911_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102911_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102912_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102912_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102922_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102922_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102934_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102934_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102950_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102950_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102951_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102951_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102953_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102953_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102958_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102958_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102962_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102962_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102986_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102986_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102996_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 102996_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103000_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103000_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103004_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103004_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103013_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103013_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103017_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103017_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103027_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103027_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103028_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103028_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103047_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103047_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103055_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103055_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103056_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103056_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103061_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103061_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103064_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103064_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103065_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103065_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103067_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103067_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103074_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103074_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103079_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103079_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103080_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103080_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103093_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103093_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103101_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103101_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103136_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103136_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103174_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103174_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103192_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103192_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103208_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 103208_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:34.92 +20:26:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.51 +18:37:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53022_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 53022_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:39.84 +20:57:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64223_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 64223_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:16.01 +20:38:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.45 +20:15:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420
The candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_04-34-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420 did not pass the final checks
