NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-05-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    14.78    10:40:36.82 +81:26:37.3   2904 5762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.86    10:40:35.60 +81:26:31.4   2904 5761   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 18.3296  2461301.8296  14.82  10:40:36.21 +81:26:34.3
128.51187  34.21745 galactic  Cam  Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.5" and 0.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 10:40:36.21 +81:26:34.3 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:40:36.21 +81:26:34.3:  15.99 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:40:36.21 +81:26:34.3:  15.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cam-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    14.72    13:50:41.29 +79:31:13.5   7623 5287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.77    13:50:38.80 +79:31:10.5   7623 5287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 18.3296  2461301.8296  14.74  13:50:40.05 +79:31:12.0
119.58527  37.22044 galactic  Cam  Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.4" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 13:50:40.05 +79:31:12.0 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:50:40.05 +79:31:12.0:  15.86 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:50:40.05 +79:31:12.0:  15.92 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cam-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    14.56    12:47:46.23 +73:08:17.9   7029 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.56    12:47:44.19 +73:08:17.0   7029 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 09 18.3296  2461301.8296  14.56  12:47:45.21 +73:08:17.4
123.30325  43.98743 galactic  Dra  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.9" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 12:47:45.21 +73:08:17.4 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:47:45.21 +73:08:17.4:  15.99 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:47:45.21 +73:08:17.4:  16.04 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cam-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 3

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 584320 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 584320 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits

renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 575.4353 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 517.8945 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1274.8304 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 493.9433 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1274.9788 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 493.2844 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.21542 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 23.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-18T02:54:04.1858550' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-18T07:54:04.1858550' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61301.3292151042 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-18T07:54:14.0855823' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61301.3293296876 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.995927638026 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4996485922154 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.4113888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 3.16388888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.7218677636654 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29536 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29536 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 59.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits :) Spent 0.746202 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 23.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-18T02:54:48.4203937' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-18T07:54:48.4203937' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61301.3297270834 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-18T07:54:58.3241047' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61301.329841713 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.995927638722 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4996486506479 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.42 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 3.20611111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.72084076148144 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29536 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29536 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 59.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits :) Spent 0.800815 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461301.82933084 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:22.828 +77:30:38.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 11:59:22.828 +77:30:38.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0342 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:21.223 +77:30:36.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 11:59:21.223 +77:30:36.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0355 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:59:22.828 +77:30:38.01 Second-epoch second image center 11:59:21.223 +77:30:36.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00153 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00153 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B05DbNSOor Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YAkMNn12XF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits &> /tmp/tmp.POzGHVVQAp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H3kTEF0hap Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.862250 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.862250 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec +70.5552 to +82.7628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec 70.5552 to 82.7628 deg Loaded 10553 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3846 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3846 out of 9444 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 2.3 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 15.4 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.B05DbNSOor (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=0, passed=8935 Got 8935 stars (including 8237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1059 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1313 n_q4=1330 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.YAkMNn12XF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, bad_region=0, passed=9444 Got 9444 stars (including 8840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5384) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.POzGHVVQAp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, bad_region=0, passed=7001 Got 7001 stars (including 6663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7001 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7001 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7001 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7001 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=10.770 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.738 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.428 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.307 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=0.908 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.262 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.285 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.307 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.285 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.243 n_q1=1120 n_q2=1051 n_q3=1482 n_q4=1244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.H3kTEF0hap (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=333, bad_region=0, passed=6994 Got 6994 stars (including 6654 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6994 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6994 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6994 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6994 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=11.046 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.597 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.456 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.306 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=0.936 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.266 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.281 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.306 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.281 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1133 n_q2=1037 n_q3=1478 n_q4=1250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.080 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.299 ref2=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.150 new1=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits sigma_overall=0.264 worst_q_ratio=1.093 new2=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.080 reference average sigma_overall=0.3375 worst_q_ratio=1.2245 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:22.828 +77:30:38.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 11:59:22.828 +77:30:38.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0342 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:21.223 +77:30:36.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 11:59:21.223 +77:30:36.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0355 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:59:22.828 +77:30:38.01 Second-epoch second image center 11:59:21.223 +77:30:36.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00153 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00153 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UKDoIhbhOB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3oSowLXBke Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K26ASomj78 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits &> /tmp/tmp.72699toNFH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.749000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.749000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec +70.4537 to +82.7794 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec 70.4537 to 82.7794 deg Loaded 10790 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3498 out of 3909 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3909 out of 48477 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 175 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 2.2 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 15.5 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.UKDoIhbhOB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2563, bad_region=1, passed=51537 Got 51537 stars (including 48894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51537 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1055 n_q2=1197 n_q3=1288 n_q4=1356 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.3oSowLXBke (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2481, bad_region=0, passed=48460 Got 48460 stars (including 45910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5376) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1139 n_q2=1198 n_q3=1281 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.K26ASomj78 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1218, bad_region=34, passed=37048 Got 37048 stars (including 35741 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37048 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37048 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37048 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37048 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5384) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=10.606 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.918 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.408 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.430 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.313 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4896 robust_rms_before=0.907 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.263 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.285 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.313 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.285 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1133 n_q2=1054 n_q3=1468 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.72699toNFH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1270, bad_region=31, passed=37234 Got 37234 stars (including 35884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37234 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37234 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37234 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37234 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5383) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=10.801 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.035 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=0.426 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.455 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.308 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4895 robust_rms_before=0.934 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.263 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.288 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.308 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.288 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1130 n_q2=1054 n_q3=1464 n_q4=1247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:41:07.39 +77:52:45.9: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:27:02.45 +79:37:53.5: 10.52 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:27:02.45 +79:37:53.5: 10.43 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:41:07.39 +77:52:45.9: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.48 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:02.45 +79:37:53.5: ref_mag=10.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7741 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:07.39 +77:52:45.9: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5800 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:00:26.73 +77:42:08.8: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:00:26.73 +77:42:08.8: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:26.73 +77:42:08.8: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8095 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:33:38.68 +78:12:47.3: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:33:38.68 +78:12:47.3: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:33:38.68 +78:12:47.3: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3894 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:32:00.37 +74:50:12.3: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:32:00.37 +74:50:12.3: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:00.37 +74:50:12.3: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4076 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:15:30.29 +75:07:33.6: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:15:30.29 +75:07:33.6: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:15:30.29 +75:07:33.6: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9330 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:36:28.25 +79:13:32.6: 14.10 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:27:11.87 +76:12:23.1: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:36:28.25 +79:13:32.6: 13.97 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:36:28.25 +79:13:32.6: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0599 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:27:11.87 +76:12:23.1: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:27:11.87 +76:12:23.1: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0049 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:34:26.94 +75:39:10.8: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:16:34.07 +76:09:09.0: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:34:26.94 +75:39:10.8: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:34:26.94 +75:39:10.8: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1291 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:16:34.07 +76:09:09.0: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:16:34.07 +76:09:09.0: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2018 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:40:36.21 +81:26:34.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:33:59.99 +81:11:16.4: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:32:23.58 +77:23:04.8: 15.42 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:50:40.05 +79:31:12.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:51:56.81 +78:53:34.5: 15.03 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:40:36.21 +81:26:34.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:33:59.99 +81:11:16.4: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:33:59.99 +81:11:16.4: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6625 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:25:50.95 +77:09:49.2: 15.29 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:47:45.21 +73:08:17.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:32:23.58 +77:23:04.8: 14.94 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:32:23.58 +77:23:04.8: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8086 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:50:40.05 +79:31:12.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:51:56.81 +78:53:34.5: 15.09 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:51:56.81 +78:53:34.5: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8404 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:25:50.95 +77:09:49.2: 15.40 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:25:50.95 +77:09:49.2: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7169 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:55:52.57 +79:18:26.8: 14.68 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:47:45.21 +73:08:17.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:55:52.57 +79:18:26.8: 14.54 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:55:52.57 +79:18:26.8: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8031 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70293.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70331.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70355.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 30s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69541_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69541_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    14.62    10:41:07.21 +77:52:45.3   2325 3688   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.55    10:41:07.56 +77:52:46.5   2326 3688   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69551_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69551_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.18    12:32:02.79 +82:09:58.3   5299 6084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 12:32:02.90 +82:09:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69553_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69553_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.02    10:51:47.26 +78:21:39.2   2721 3885   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69557_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69557_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.08    10:38:34.48 +76:32:59.1   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69563_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69563_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.14    11:45:34.67 +81:51:52.1   4348 5808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 11:45:34.51 +81:51:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69565_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69565_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    10.86    11:27:02.39 +79:37:53.8   3842 4480   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    10.71    11:27:02.51 +79:37:53.2   3842 4480   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69596_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69596_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    10.67    09:31:54.93 +78:52:41.2   0641 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69597_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69597_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    10.61    09:47:21.56 +75:49:01.2   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69617_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69617_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    11.07    11:23:23.10 +79:18:40.8   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69634_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69634_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    11.30    12:02:24.78 +73:08:51.9   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69636_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69636_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    11.54    12:25:32.19 +81:20:44.2   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69647_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69647_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    11.59    13:27:49.27 +73:34:06.5   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69660_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69660_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    11.95    10:51:32.87 +73:27:26.5   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69669_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69669_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.03    12:01:11.03 +74:41:11.9   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69670_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69670_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.01    11:44:53.70 +74:19:35.0   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69674_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69674_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.22    11:53:01.72 +82:35:05.6   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69682_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69682_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.13    13:17:09.13 +73:26:33.9   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69683_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69683_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.22    10:29:24.40 +73:56:00.5   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69686_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69686_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.13    11:55:46.17 +72:24:02.3   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69719_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69719_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.57    12:21:05.93 +74:53:16.1   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69729_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69729_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.80    11:32:24.83 +80:24:15.9   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69735_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69735_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    12.80    11:00:26.64 +77:42:08.7   2901 3440   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.82    11:00:26.82 +77:42:08.9   2902 3440   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69736_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69736_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.68    11:59:35.07 +76:47:56.7   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69739_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69739_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.76    12:33:48.05 +76:38:36.1   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69745_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69745_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.79    10:15:02.43 +75:17:22.0   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69747_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69747_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.11    11:30:53.40 +81:59:43.4   4039 5898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69753_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69753_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.90    11:23:45.47 +80:27:21.5   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69766_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69766_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.88    13:38:41.87 +77:03:30.2   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69767_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69767_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.17    09:34:42.28 +77:44:34.1   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69788_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69788_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.96    10:44:39.31 +73:22:27.0   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69789_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69789_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.10    10:26:43.64 +72:56:02.6   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69793_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69793_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.89    13:43:35.22 +73:50:41.0   9112 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69797_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69797_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.19    10:35:09.29 +71:46:20.7   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69800_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69800_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    12.96    14:00:56.31 +75:41:48.7   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69801_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69801_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.13    09:33:51.16 +77:17:50.5   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69803_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69803_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.09    09:27:30.79 +78:03:18.4   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69813_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69813_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.33    10:01:38.21 +76:18:18.4   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69818_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69818_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.36    09:45:50.16 +76:43:44.7   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69825_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69825_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.31    11:02:36.33 +82:01:10.7   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69831_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69831_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.45    10:59:45.76 +79:39:34.1   3112 4601   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 10:59:45.77 +79:39:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69833_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69833_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    13.49    09:33:38.74 +78:12:47.9   0465 4738   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.32    09:33:38.62 +78:12:46.6   0466 4737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69837_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69837_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.29    10:03:33.52 +74:20:31.3   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69843_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69843_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.31    10:21:17.77 +75:00:09.7   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69847_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69847_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.39    10:23:23.35 +76:01:54.6   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69858_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69858_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.53    09:48:16.61 +75:56:49.9   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69861_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69861_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.30    11:19:10.78 +73:20:41.5   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69864_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69864_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.67    10:52:52.25 +81:20:46.5   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69872_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69872_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.40    13:01:31.95 +73:58:02.9   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69876_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69876_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.36    13:46:07.77 +74:00:06.3   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69878_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69878_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.54    10:57:15.17 +74:22:22.1   2383 1495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 10:57:15.08 +74:22:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69879_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69879_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.62    10:34:23.54 +78:43:31.9   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69887_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69887_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.46    14:09:01.23 +76:34:26.9   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69889_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69889_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.45    10:20:10.83 +73:24:10.4   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69891_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69891_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.51    10:40:36.69 +74:52:58.9   1808 1952   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 10:40:36.67 +74:52:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69906_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69906_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.42    13:16:22.33 +73:53:22.7   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69907_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69907_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.41    12:15:17.17 +72:32:56.2   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69911_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69911_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.83    09:45:44.02 +78:18:06.3   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69918_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69918_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    13.49    12:32:00.22 +74:50:12.3   6154 1750   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.36    12:32:00.53 +74:50:12.2   6155 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69920_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69920_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.46    12:06:45.64 +75:04:12.1   5158 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69924_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69924_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.74    14:20:24.45 +79:41:46.0   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69927_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69927_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.68    13:49:16.54 +77:37:47.0   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69931_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69931_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.79    10:08:38.89 +76:53:59.6   1110 3496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69933_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69933_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.77    12:44:36.42 +79:57:50.0   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69938_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69938_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.33    10:52:47.06 +72:16:08.5   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69939_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69939_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.80    10:09:53.34 +79:29:37.9   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69940_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69940_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.85    10:55:47.14 +77:05:43.7   2677 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 10:55:47.34 +77:05:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69941_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69941_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.90    10:32:17.15 +73:13:02.7   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69945_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69945_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.93    10:56:44.42 +81:47:50.8   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69946_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69946_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.51    10:24:10.99 +73:24:39.0   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69949_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69949_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.79    14:21:13.73 +80:05:37.0   8112 6041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69952_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69952_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.38    12:17:32.52 +74:48:24.6   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69953_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69953_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.97    11:10:33.89 +80:57:25.9   3519 5324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69954_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69954_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.74    12:49:00.60 +79:11:59.7   6113 4437   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 12:49:00.39 +79:11:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69959_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69959_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.80    14:13:00.78 +79:31:14.0   8143 5629   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 14:13:01.06 +79:31:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69968_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69968_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.97    12:20:08.60 +79:11:40.8   5316 4266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 12:20:08.42 +79:11:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69970_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69970_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.78    12:54:34.06 +76:04:56.5   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69980_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69980_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.67    13:17:05.45 +72:56:24.8   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69990_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69990_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.62    13:02:37.41 +74:20:56.0   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69993_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69993_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.77    13:08:47.78 +74:06:16.4   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69994_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69994_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    13.92    11:15:30.37 +75:07:33.8   3176 1824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.95    11:15:30.21 +75:07:33.5   3176 1824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69997_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 69997_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.21    09:46:29.73 +79:33:02.4   1212 5239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70002_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70002_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.98    11:15:45.49 +78:15:59.3   3432 3697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 11:15:45.13 +78:15:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70004_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70004_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.93    10:21:40.29 +74:51:18.4   1087 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70005_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70005_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.95    11:13:54.15 +78:12:51.9   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70006_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70006_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.92    14:07:55.53 +79:15:00.8   8121 5412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70013_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70013_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.77    13:44:38.91 +77:09:40.2   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70014_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70014_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.73    13:03:16.14 +72:51:06.6   7740 0929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70016_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70016_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.90    13:16:32.48 +81:51:33.6   6247 6179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70023_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70023_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.22    10:06:17.77 +78:39:01.7   1476 4494   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70025_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70025_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.20    12:03:35.19 +73:38:32.0   5099 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70027_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70027_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.75    12:34:34.83 +76:02:08.0   6107 2478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 12:34:34.78 +76:02:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70030_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70030_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.87    13:47:29.78 +77:14:07.7   8233 4043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70031_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70031_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.26    12:23:48.64 +75:51:17.7   5739 2299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 12:23:48.63 +75:51:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70035_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70035_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.80    11:30:03.16 +72:34:54.9   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70041_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70041_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.85    13:43:16.41 +77:23:30.6   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70045_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70045_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    14.01    13:27:11.98 +76:12:22.6   7885 3167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.00    13:27:11.75 +76:12:23.6   7885 3168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70050_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70050_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.20    10:13:08.60 +79:56:28.6   1967 5132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70053_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70053_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    14.09    12:36:28.55 +79:13:31.7   5765 4366   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.03    12:36:27.96 +79:13:33.6   5765 4367   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70054_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70054_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.11    10:15:21.55 +73:39:50.0   0575 1586   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70056_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70056_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.97    14:32:26.49 +80:00:25.1   8376 6190   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70063_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70063_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.11    10:13:06.52 +77:21:01.5   1358 3687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70066_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70066_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.24    10:27:45.19 +78:46:33.8   2098 4327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70078_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70078_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.39    10:52:48.74 +79:04:40.7   2849 4299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70084_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70084_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.13    10:24:18.61 +79:33:46.7   2165 4808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70086_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70086_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.38    13:51:59.52 +75:26:28.6   8924 3185   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70087_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70087_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.11    12:04:49.54 +75:20:16.8   5070 1906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 12:04:49.65 +75:20:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70089_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70089_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.13    13:20:10.89 +78:48:24.4   7039 4510   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70090_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70090_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.15    13:44:57.47 +79:48:32.5   7401 5361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70099_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70099_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.24    12:13:37.42 +78:24:56.6   5188 3776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 12:13:37.31 +78:24:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70104_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70104_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.27    13:07:09.00 +76:15:28.5   7203 2925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70108_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70108_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.02    13:20:02.02 +72:41:36.6   8483 1103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70110_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70110_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.13    11:15:26.19 +75:27:19.3   3200 2021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70115_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70115_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    14.13    12:34:26.87 +75:39:09.7   6148 2251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.12    12:34:27.02 +75:39:11.8   6149 2251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70117_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70117_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.24    12:55:23.84 +73:26:52.2   7298 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70125_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70125_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.08    11:18:50.26 +75:39:18.5   3342 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70126_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70126_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.32    10:33:57.54 +77:43:27.1   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70128_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70128_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.15    12:01:00.03 +76:26:38.5   4883 2559   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70129_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70129_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.57    11:27:42.94 +73:23:35.5   3564 0732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70139_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70139_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.35    11:03:48.19 +79:04:34.6   3157 4234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70140_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70140_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    14.20    12:16:33.95 +76:09:08.7   5451 2438   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.20    12:16:34.18 +76:09:09.3   5452 2438   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70149_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70149_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.13    11:43:49.97 +78:46:20.7   4292 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70153_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70153_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.07    10:06:25.81 +74:30:18.8   0434 2202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70156_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70156_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.55    10:03:24.95 +79:39:25.6   1657 5082   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70161_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70161_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.92    14:00:37.39 +76:23:32.3   8892 3843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70171_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70171_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.46    10:35:03.17 +72:13:22.5   1108 0468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70179_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70179_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.47    13:43:16.73 +80:18:36.2   7216 5605   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70194_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70194_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.42    13:30:51.13 +78:13:36.0   7477 4324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70196_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70196_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.43    14:05:34.82 +78:48:11.5   8218 5150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70197_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70197_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.10    14:17:53.89 +80:13:10.2   7996 6048   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70199_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70199_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.30    13:50:14.48 +74:09:08.3   9265 2475   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70204_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70204_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.05    13:03:06.41 +76:29:41.5   7020 3012   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 13:03:06.28 +76:29:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70216_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70216_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.26    10:43:03.26 +80:11:40.1   2757 5018   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70220_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70220_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.20    11:46:51.91 +73:47:47.1   4389 0947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70222_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70222_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.15    10:58:51.83 +79:36:47.1   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70226_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70226_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.63    10:54:29.30 +74:24:47.0   2278 1542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70230_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70230_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.52    11:31:21.04 +77:22:07.8   3873 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70231_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70231_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.69    11:43:36.47 +75:16:29.2   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70232_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70232_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.70    11:32:24.47 +81:03:39.8   4038 5331   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70236_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70236_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.08    12:39:22.26 +73:54:12.5   6567 1262   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70241_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70241_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.19    10:15:55.46 +77:28:53.9   1475 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70252_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70252_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.66    12:03:12.76 +78:31:38.1   4870 3813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70268_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70268_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.51    13:20:19.45 +80:51:09.3   6560 5649   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70273_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70273_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.36    11:03:10.59 +74:41:37.8   2656 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70277_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70277_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.65    10:23:36.29 +72:42:41.2   0704 0915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70279_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70279_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.32    14:15:04.94 +76:57:09.6   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70282_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70282_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.65    11:35:38.83 +81:16:44.2   4120 5459   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 11:35:38.69 +81:16:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70290_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70290_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.65    10:39:32.69 +73:25:11.7   1516 1111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70293_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 Preparing report for the candidate 70293_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70295_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70295_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    14.71    10:33:59.53 +81:11:16.1   2714 5658   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.62    10:34:00.45 +81:11:16.8   2715 5658   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70303_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70303_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.56    12:13:22.88 +77:44:07.1   5228 3369   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70306_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70306_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.36    13:47:54.17 +74:43:34.1   9005 2730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70309_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70309_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.49    13:23:36.51 +77:04:18.9   7555 3593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70312_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70312_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.30    13:37:04.03 +77:25:58.6   7869 3983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70315_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70315_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.39    11:21:47.53 +81:48:01.5   3836 5797   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70319_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70319_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.68    12:45:37.00 +80:24:28.7   5838 5117   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits **** FOUND 12:45:37.01 +80:24:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70320_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70320_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.48    13:06:45.82 +78:58:20.7   6638 4460   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70328_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70328_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    14.76    10:32:23.26 +77:23:05.3   1966 3485   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.88    10:32:23.89 +77:23:04.3   1967 3484   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70329_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70329_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.62    11:27:55.79 +77:55:52.8   3787 3458   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70331_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 Preparing report for the candidate 70331_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70335_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70335_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.54    11:18:54.59 +79:56:07.3   3644 4684   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70347_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70347_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.56    12:24:34.23 +80:17:54.0   5331 4941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70349_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70349_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    14.85    11:51:57.02 +78:53:34.6   4527 4016   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.82    11:51:56.60 +78:53:34.3   4528 4016   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70352_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70352_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    14.71    13:25:50.49 +77:09:50.0   7601 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.73    13:25:51.41 +77:09:48.4   7602 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70353_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70353_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.76    12:39:39.65 +76:25:32.7   6234 2746   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70354_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70354_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.43    13:26:13.56 +76:52:23.4   7686 3520   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70355_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 Preparing report for the candidate 70355_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70356_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70356_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.43    10:45:17.52 +74:07:05.4   1867 1456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70366_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70366_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.81    12:02:00.21 +77:17:26.5   4884 3069   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70368_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70368_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.25    14:03:19.32 +76:54:04.9   8802 4153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70371_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70371_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 09 18.32933    2461301.82933    14.80    11:55:51.96 +79:18:25.9   4630 4269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0323.fits Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.81    11:55:53.17 +79:18:27.7   4632 4269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70382_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70382_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    15.01    11:00:13.86 +77:04:44.1   2822 3073   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70398_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70398_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.36    12:17:10.03 +77:16:54.9   5384 3114   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70403_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 70403_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    14.63    12:04:53.32 +77:42:46.6   4959 3329   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66226_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 66226_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.59    10:11:43.00 +73:05:50.7   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21925_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 The candidate 21925_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 09 18.32984    2461301.82984    13.82    11:32:36.88 +76:34:47.8   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_025533_TTUQ1b1x1_443136_c5Xt1uio/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_02-54-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0324.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 34s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 10:40:36.21 +81:26:34.3 13:50:40.05 +79:31:12.0 12:47:45.21 +73:08:17.4 ########### Completed Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 10:40:36.21 +81:26:34.3 13:50:40.05 +79:31:12.0 12:47:45.21 +73:08:17.4 ################################################################################### 10:40:36.21 +81:26:34.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 13:50:40.05 +79:31:12.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 12:47:45.21 +73:08:17.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 10:40:36.21 +81:26:34.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 12:47:45.21 +73:08:17.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 13:50:40.05 +79:31:12.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 10:40:36.21 +81:26:34.3 -- not a known variable star 12:47:45.21 +73:08:17.4 -- not a known variable star 13:50:40.05 +79:31:12.0 -- not a known variable star Found 3 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 3 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 10:40:36.21 +81:26:34.3 12:47:45.21 +73:08:17.4 13:50:40.05 +79:31:12.0 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461301.82933084 -observatory V36 12:43:58.91 -04:54:21.0 Mercury (-0.3mag) 13:59:51.08 -18:13:32.1 Venus (-4.8mag) 07:43:11.96 +22:08:07.2 Mars (1.2mag) 09:17:53.48 +16:19:30.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:48:58.68 +02:19:32.4 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:13:36.44 +21:01:48.1 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:12:40.06 -00:10:27.1 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:55.24 -23:41:45.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 17:08:11.53 -28:10:46.8 Moon (-10.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 18 02:56 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461301.82933084: 09:17:49.05 +16:19:54.2 Io (6.0mag) 09:17:45.17 +16:20:14.6 Europa (6.2mag) 09:17:49.64 +16:19:52.9 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:18:01.26 +16:18:51.2 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:16:07.86 +16:39:59.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:17:52.57 +16:19:35.9 Thebe (16.5mag) 09:15:35.04 +16:34:13.9 Elara (17.7mag) 09:21:27.61 +15:44:16.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:18:10.33 +16:40:21.2 Carme (18.9mag) 00:49:10.83 +02:19:14.1 Titan (8.3mag) 00:49:03.17 +02:19:19.4 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:48:42.29 +02:20:21.6 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:48:43.13 +02:19:39.5 Hyperion (14.3mag) 00:47:34.65 +02:08:21.0 Phoebe (16.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 18 02:57 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461301.82933084: 23:38:04.12 +11:42:56.8 JWST 18:22:46.48 +20:53:24.6 Chandra 06:28:32.50 +16:56:10.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 18 02:56 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461301.82933084 -observatory V36 03:45:34.10 +19:46:40.5 17.3mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:07:53.78 -33:59:54.8 14.5mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:27:19.74 -70:56:19.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:16:35.37 +33:59:39.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 05:03:17.20 +46:53:18.3 16.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:05:05.45 +27:14:39.6 17.5mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:18:01.24 +25:46:49.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:59:35.31 +26:51:35.7 17.1mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:55:31.82 +05:10:14.4 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:27:31.28 -16:36:44.4 15.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:47:28.53 +33:37:51.5 15.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:08:26.27 +15:12:19.3 18.0mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:28:11.58 +42:40:54.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:12:03.48 +48:32:38.2 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:40:46.83 -13:12:04.6 15.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:14:38.44 +16:16:24.9 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:36:09.86 +17:53:29.6 16.6mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:29:03.94 -00:47:15.3 16.7mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:14:19.40 +71:59:18.5 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:58:48.67 +45:37:51.7 17.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:23:36.28 +12:11:14.4 17.6mag A/2026 E1 22:35:24.21 -35:05:49.3 13.6mag 10P/Tempel 01:36:39.35 +38:53:22.1 17.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 11:55:36.78 -06:18:49.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 12:30:46.80 -08:32:28.2 17.8mag 63P/Wild 06:59:48.37 +18:19:48.1 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:15:51.51 +15:01:15.0 16.8mag 88P/Howell 06:15:49.81 +32:44:31.9 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 08:03:33.41 +21:45:55.2 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:52:13.84 +18:28:38.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 13:11:22.16 -25:05:34.2 17.6mag 124P/Mrkos 06:30:04.09 +20:15:43.0 15.8mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 01:31:27.80 -15:09:39.1 14.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 09:33:10.68 +08:18:34.6 12.5mag 169P/NEAT 03:31:18.69 +07:25:17.4 14.6mag 220P/McNaught 05:16:35.38 +39:34:16.6 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 09:00:34.40 +34:25:50.4 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:32:54.33 -01:28:27.0 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:37:07.93 +16:17:34.4 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Sep 18 02:56 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 18 02:56 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 18 02:56 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:13:19.490 +17:00:24.97 AT 2026zud 2026-08-10.71 20.48 00:21:00.990 +44:37:13.24 AT 2026zuc 2026-08-08.73 21.05 23:36:38.870 +35:27:45.75 AT 2026zub 2026-08-08.72 21.58 16:12:46.730 +35:52:51.05 AT 2026zua 2026-08-06.66 21.15 16:21:55.120 +33:34:30.72 AT 2026ztz 2026-07-30.70 20.99 00:07:50.530 +34:47:54.45 AT 2026zty 2026-07-22.75 20.79 15:29:46.440 +49:16:21.79 AT 2026ztx 2026-07-17.72 20.75 01:13:17.440 -00:46:57.82 AT 2026ztw 2026-08-21.85 22.62 23:39:45.630 +02:14:11.23 AT 2026ztv 2026-08-21.76 21.96 01:11:24.280 -00:53:49.91 AT 2026ztu 2026-08-20.87 22.9 00:00:20.520 +02:13:22.36 AT 2026ztt 2026-08-20.76 22.13 02:07:01.070 +02:19:51.17 AT 2026zts 2026-08-19.90 22.6 23:21:03.710 +02:33:46.65 AT 2026ztr 2026-08-18.75 22.61 02:09:42.020 +06:04:07.32 AT 2026ztq 2026-08-17.90 22.57 01:48:49.310 -00:49:41.07 AT 2026ztp 2026-08-17.86 22.78 23:46:19.220 +05:36:55.63 AT 2026zto 2026-08-16.76 21.56 02:13:40.640 -01:03:52.18 AT 2026ztn 2026-08-14.90 22.82 02:10:05.480 +01:50:53.37 AT 2026ztm 2026-08-14.89 22.74 02:01:32.470 +03:33:31.10 AT 2026ztl 2026-08-14.89 22.82 01:35:45.000 -00:43:17.91 AT 2026ztk 2026-08-14.88 22.86 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Sep 18 02:56 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 96 C - WARNING