This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7862,8.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2862 8.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2862 2461301.7862 11.76 23:46:47.82 -02:56:25.2
87.57422 -61.29292 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -0 -0 0 11.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:46:47.82 -02:56:25.2: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:46:47.82 -02:56:25.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7862,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2862 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2862 2461301.7862 12.07 00:08:42.90 -04:49:53.9
96.50117 -65.48713 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.217 Eudora -0 -0 0 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:08:42.90 -04:49:53.9: 15.11 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:08:42.90 -04:49:53.9: 15.49 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.18
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7862,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2862 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7862,8.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2862 8.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2862 2461301.7862 13.12 23:35:14.55 -01:38:31.8
84.10237 -58.64664 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun 0 -0 0 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:35:14.55 -01:38:31.8: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:35:14.55 -01:38:31.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7862,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2862 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2862 2461301.7862 13.38 23:35:18.02 -04:08:47.0
81.26966 -60.70289 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.799 Gudula -0 0 0 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:35:18.02 -04:08:47.0: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:35:18.02 -04:08:47.0: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7862,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2862 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2862 2461301.7862 13.45 00:14:07.76 +01:28:20.8
104.01188 -60.02168 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.551 Ortrud -1 0 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:14:07.76 +01:28:20.8: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:14:07.76 +01:28:20.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7862,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2862 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2862 2461301.7862 13.90 23:55:30.70 -03:33:40.3
90.96054 -62.90801 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.864 Aase 0 -0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:30.70 -03:33:40.3: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:30.70 -03:33:40.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7862,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2862 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2862 2461301.7862 13.95 23:34:25.93 -00:01:11.1
85.46323 -57.18003 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.440 Theodora -0 -1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:25.93 -00:01:11.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:25.93 -00:01:11.1: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7862,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2862 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2862 2461301.7862 14.22 23:51:56.93 -03:14:50.0
89.59685 -62.20500 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.223 Rosa -0 -1 1 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:51:56.93 -03:14:50.0: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:51:56.93 -03:14:50.0: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7862,14.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2862 14.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461301.78639686 18.09.2026 06:52:14.689 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4594
Objects passed selection criteria: 4594
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4444
Average stars matched: 4287.75 (96.484 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231796 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 02:18:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461301.78639686 18.09.2026 06:52:14.689 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 169
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25078
Objects passed selection criteria: 24990
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24369
Average stars matched: 23194.5 (95.1804 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 250536 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 02:20:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461301.78595065
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.670 -01:59:43.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.670 -01:59:43.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0101 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.753 -01:59:25.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:58.753 -01:59:25.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0161 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.670 -01:59:43.19
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:58.753 -01:59:25.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00627 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dizMTwHXEg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cf8MzTYSt9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gyqQOga2Om
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pJ7Wi95q5e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.632850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.632850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=6.3)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5464 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to +3.2771 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to 3.2771 deg
Loaded 113493 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3322 out of 3420 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3420 out of 5464 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.1 mag. Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.dizMTwHXEg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=1203, passed=5537
Got 5537 stars (including 4070 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1391 through 0 to 7.8851, gap 7.8851 to 352.1391
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1393 through 0 to 7.8851, gap 7.8851 to 352.1393
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 3972 stars left (next iteration limit 4369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=3972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=1263 n_q2=686 n_q3=1324 n_q4=699 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Cf8MzTYSt9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=1178, passed=5461
Got 5461 stars (including 4010 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1355 through 0 to 7.8705, gap 7.8705 to 352.1355
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1357 through 0 to 7.8705, gap 7.8705 to 352.1357
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 3913 stars left (next iteration limit 4305)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=3913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=1258 n_q2=678 n_q3=1296 n_q4=681 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gyqQOga2Om (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=356, bad_region=1264, passed=5907
Got 5907 stars (including 4365 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5907 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1419 through 0 to 7.8708, gap 7.8708 to 352.1419
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4261 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4252 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4252 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1421 through 0 to 7.8709, gap 7.8709 to 352.1421
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4261 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4253 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4253 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4253 stars left (next iteration limit 4677)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4253 robust_rms=6.942 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.657 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4253 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.493 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4253 robust_rms=0.294 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.303 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4253 robust_rms_before=0.908 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.294 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.299 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.303
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.299 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits N_match=4253 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=1390 n_q2=767 n_q3=1353 n_q4=743 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pJ7Wi95q5e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=352, bad_region=1268, passed=5899
Got 5899 stars (including 4350 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5899 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1384 through 0 to 7.8679, gap 7.8679 to 352.1384
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4246 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4239 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4239 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1386 through 0 to 7.8681, gap 7.8681 to 352.1386
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4246 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4239 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4239 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4239 stars left (next iteration limit 4662)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4239 robust_rms=6.930 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.316 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4239 robust_rms=0.366 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.455 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4239 robust_rms=0.294 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.315 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4239 robust_rms_before=0.890 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.282 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.294 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.302 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.315
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.302 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits N_match=4239 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=1384 n_q2=759 n_q3=1345 n_q4=751 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.153
ref2=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.142
new1=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits sigma_overall=0.297 worst_q_ratio=1.072
new2=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits sigma_overall=0.290 worst_q_ratio=1.072
reference average sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.1475
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999_astrometric_residuals.png (3972 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000_astrometric_residuals.png (3913 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324_astrometric_residuals.png (4253 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325_astrometric_residuals.png (4239 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:08:42.90 -04:49:53.9: 15.11 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:46:47.82 -02:56:25.2: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:41:11.94 +00:47:09.9: 10.67 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:16.63 -02:28:32.6: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:08:42.90 -04:49:53.9: 15.49 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:16.63 -02:28:32.6: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:16.63 -02:28:32.6: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0808 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:08:42.90 -04:49:53.9: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=12.0715 delta=3.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:41:11.94 +00:47:09.9: 10.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:46:47.82 -02:56:25.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.66 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:11.94 +00:47:09.9: ref_mag=10.66 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0509 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20229.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20231.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20223_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 20223_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20224_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 20224_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20229_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 20229_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20230_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 20230_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:51:14.95 -02:45:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20231_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 20231_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20233_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 20233_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:46:47.82 -02:56:25.2
00:08:42.90 -04:49:53.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.670 -01:59:43.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.670 -01:59:43.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0101 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.753 -01:59:25.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:58.753 -01:59:25.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0161 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.670 -01:59:43.19
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:58.753 -01:59:25.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00627 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lCNkwkgZ2S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oEs8Pg5pDu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HYIIOVQhE3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n84VBGdv6f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 29281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to +3.2741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to 3.2741 deg
Loaded 113505 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3329 out of 3554 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3554 out of 29281 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.525300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.525300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 29281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to +3.2741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to 3.2741 deg
Loaded 113505 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3329 out of 3554 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3554 out of 29281 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=5.0)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 30046 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1258 to 7.8769 deg, Dec -7.2751 to +3.2772 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1258 to 7.8769 deg, Dec -7.2751 to 3.2772 deg
Loaded 113502 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3314 out of 3546 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3546 out of 30046 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 84 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.1 pix Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lCNkwkgZ2S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1084, bad_region=5467, passed=29269
Got 29269 stars (including 22908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29269 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1384 through 0 to 7.8963, gap 7.8963 to 352.1384
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1387 through 0 to 7.8963, gap 7.8963 to 352.1387
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=1560 n_q2=873 n_q3=1533 n_q4=884 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.oEs8Pg5pDu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1265, bad_region=5561, passed=30034
Got 30034 stars (including 23398 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30034 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1258 through 0 to 7.8769, gap 7.8769 to 352.1258
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1262 through 0 to 7.8769, gap 7.8769 to 352.1262
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=1568 n_q2=872 n_q3=1544 n_q4=870 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HYIIOVQhE3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1156, bad_region=5148, passed=30124
Got 30124 stars (including 24058 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30124 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1409 through 0 to 7.8758, gap 7.8758 to 352.1409
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1410 through 0 to 7.8759, gap 7.8759 to 352.1410
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=6.813 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.637 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.498 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.312 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4850 robust_rms_before=0.900 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.289 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.305 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.312
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.305 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1562 n_q2=839 n_q3=1568 n_q4=881 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.n84VBGdv6f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1149, bad_region=5173, passed=30046
Got 30046 stars (including 23969 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30046 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1379 through 0 to 7.8793, gap 7.8793 to 352.1379
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1381 through 0 to 7.8794, gap 7.8794 to 352.1381
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=6.801 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.702 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.371 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.452 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.309 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4852 robust_rms_before=0.884 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.303 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.309
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.303 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1565 n_q2=848 n_q3=1566 n_q4=873 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-51-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_020815_TTUQ2b1x1_1412045_fkH9yvvo/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:38:24.46 +01:55:17.3: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:35:14.55 -01:38:31.8: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:47:44.00 +02:02:26.7: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:28.09 +00:59:06.7: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:35:18.02 -04:08:47.0: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:14:07.76 +01:28:20.8: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:38:24.46 +01:55:17.3: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:14:07.76 +01:28:20.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:47:44.00 +02:02:26.7: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:35:18.02 -04:08:47.0: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:35:14.55 -01:38:31.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:28.09 +00:59:06.7: 14.08 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:24.46 +01:55:17.3: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5762 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:44.00 +02:02:26.7: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3779 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:28.09 +00:59:06.7: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3174 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:56:27.60 -00:35:54.2: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:56:27.60 -00:35:54.2: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:27.60 -00:35:54.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5580 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:53:00.26 -00:17:38.1: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:30.70 -03:33:40.3: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:25.93 -00:01:11.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:53:00.26 -00:17:38.1: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:53:00.26 -00:17:38.1: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9063 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:30.70 -03:33:40.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:25.93 -00:01:11.1: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:00:36.98 +00:12:02.4: 14.19 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:00:36.98 +00:12:02.4: 13.98 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:51:56.93 -03:14:50.0: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:36.98 +00:12:02.4: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2479 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:51:56.93 -03:14:50.0: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:27.93 +01:40:47.2: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:32.91 -02:27:59.3: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:27.93 +01:40:47.2: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:33:02.66 +01:48:15.5: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:27.93 +01:40:47.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3482 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:32.91 -02:27:59.3: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:32.91 -02:27:59.3: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4144 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:33:02.66 +01:48:15.5: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:02.66 +01:48:15.5: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6396 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:46:39.25 -03:07:53.5: 14.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:36:35.59 +02:04:15.5: 15.25 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:38:34.03 -03:24:10.4: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:46:39.25 -03:07:53.5: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:46:39.25 -03:07:53.5: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5277 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:36:35.59 +02:04:15.5: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:35.59 +02:04:15.5: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7392 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:38:34.03 -03:24:10.4: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:34.03 -03:24:10.4: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6029 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:42:13.57 +01:39:23.1: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:42:13.57 +01:39:23.1: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:13.57 +01:39:23.1: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6913 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:40:28.34 +02:07:08.8: 14.35 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:59:54.81 -00:15:40.6: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:40:28.34 +02:07:08.8: 14.28 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:59:54.81 -00:15:40.6: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:28.34 +02:07:08.8: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5557 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:54.81 -00:15:40.6: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4907 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:33:28.86 -01:59:01.9: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:38.86 +00:52:07.8: 15.34 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:33:28.86 -01:59:01.9: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:28.86 -01:59:01.9: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6928 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:38.86 +00:52:07.8: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:38.86 +00:52:07.8: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7707 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:57:20.43 -06:06:32.2: 14.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:40:04.78 +01:13:50.0: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:40:04.78 +01:13:50.0: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:57:20.43 -06:06:32.2: 14.39 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:20.43 -06:06:32.2: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3919 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:04.78 +01:13:50.0: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7450 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:40:59.16 +01:33:23.3: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:40:59.16 +01:33:23.3: 15.27 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:59.16 +01:33:23.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7819 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:54:39.43 -01:59:03.3: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:54:39.43 -01:59:03.3: 15.16 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:39.43 -01:59:03.3: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6649 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:45.89 -00:13:56.5: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:36:55.11 +00:06:00.0: 15.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:45.89 -00:13:56.5: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:45.89 -00:13:56.5: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6554 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:36:55.11 +00:06:00.0: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:55.11 +00:06:00.0: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7198 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32362.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32373.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32374.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32409.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32422.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32459.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 13s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32331_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32331_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32333_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 32333_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32337_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32337_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32338_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32338_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32341_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32341_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:46:47.82 -02:56:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32343_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32343_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32344_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32344_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32345_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32346_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32346_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:08:42.90 -04:49:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32349_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32349_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32353_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32353_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32356_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32356_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32357_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32357_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32362_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 32362_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32367_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32367_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32371_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32371_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32373_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 32373_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32374_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 32374_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32375_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32375_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32377_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32377_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32378_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32378_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32382_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32382_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32384_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32384_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32388_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32388_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32390_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32390_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32391_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32391_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32393_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32393_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32401_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32401_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32403_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32403_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32409_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 32409_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32410_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32410_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32412_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32412_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32422_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 32422_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32424_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32424_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32428_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32428_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32429_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32429_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32431_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32431_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32435_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32435_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32438_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32438_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32440_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32440_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32441_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32441_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32442_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32442_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32443_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32443_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32444_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32444_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32445_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32445_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32449_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32449_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32451_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32451_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32453_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32453_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32457_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32457_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32458_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32458_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32459_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
Preparing report for the candidate 32459_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32461_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32461_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32462_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32462_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:42:02.87 -04:31:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32463_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32463_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32467_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32467_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32470_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32470_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32472_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32472_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32479_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32479_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32486_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32486_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32487_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32487_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32492_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32492_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32496_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32496_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32502_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32502_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32505_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32505_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32507_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32507_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32515_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32515_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32519_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32519_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32520_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32520_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32523_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32523_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32524_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32524_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32527_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32527_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32532_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32532_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32535_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32535_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32538_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32538_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32539_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32539_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32540_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32540_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32542_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32542_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32544_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32544_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32547_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32547_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32548_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32548_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:26.59 -05:32:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32549_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32549_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32557_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 32557_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31109_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 31109_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03133_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325
The candidate 03133_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-09-18_01-52-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0325 did not pass the final checks
