This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2889 2461301.7889 12.12 05:26:36.05 +29:31:29.3
177.26829 -3.17902 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia 1 0 1 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:26:36.05 +29:31:29.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:26:36.05 +29:31:29.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7889,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2889 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2889 2461301.7889 12.92 06:08:27.51 +26:18:02.4
184.81851 3.05467 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 3.9 pix This object is listed in spacecraft.txt 1502.8" XMM-NewtonThe object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J060827.42+261802.5
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.100 V 14.280 V 2457344.93400 23.812000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:27.51 +26:18:02.4: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:27.51 +26:18:02.4: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J060827.42+261802.5,2461301.7889,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J060827.42+261802.5 20260918.2889 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2889 2461301.7889 13.08 05:57:52.72 +26:05:02.4
183.83984 0.88141 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 3.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J055752.67+260500.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.300 g Y 0.360 g 2458592.61100 635.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:57:52.72 +26:05:02.4: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:52.72 +26:05:02.4: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2889* 05 57 52.72 +26 05 02.4 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J055752.67+260500.8,2461301.7889,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J055752.67+260500.8 20260918.2889 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2889 2461301.7889 13.14 05:44:50.07 +25:55:21.0
182.48085 -1.72042 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 3.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ZTF J054449.83+255518.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.850 r Y 0.335 r 2458380.52940 64.517644500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:50.07 +25:55:21.0: 14.53 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:50.07 +25:55:21.0: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2889* 05 44 50.07 +25 55 21.0 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J054449.83+255518.1,2461301.7889,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J054449.83+255518.1 20260918.2889 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2889 2461301.7889 12.70 06:16:02.42 +25:38:31.9
186.21323 4.23786 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 4.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" 2MASS J06160241+2538311
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.375 r Y 0.807 r 2458517.39910 108.091876100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:16:02.42 +25:38:31.9: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:02.42 +25:38:31.9: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
2MASS J06160241+2538311,2461301.7889,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
2MASS J06160241+2538311 20260918.2889 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2889 2461301.7889 13.33 05:58:58.18 +26:48:43.0
183.33090 1.45642 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 4.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J055858.10+264844.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.734 r Y 0.681 r 2458412.82900 314.817606000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:58:58.18 +26:48:43.0: 14.48 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:58.18 +26:48:43.0: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2889* 05 58 58.18 +26 48 43.0 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J055858.10+264844.0,2461301.7889,13.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J055858.10+264844.0 20260918.2889 13.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2889 2461301.7889 13.24 05:37:27.74 +28:39:31.8
179.29103 -1.66385 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 4.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-V J053727.47+283933.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.400 V 16.100 V 2457361.00000 222.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:37:27.74 +28:39:31.8: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:37:27.74 +28:39:31.8: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053727.47+283933.8,2461301.7889,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053727.47+283933.8 20260918.2889 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2889 2461301.7889 13.24 05:46:09.41 +29:08:33.4
179.88482 0.20765 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 3.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J054609.34+290833.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.640 g Y 0.500 g 2459250.62500 30.900000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:09.41 +29:08:33.4: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:09.41 +29:08:33.4: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J054609.34+290833.8,2461301.7889,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J054609.34+290833.8 20260918.2889 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2889 2461301.7889 12.96 05:51:59.05 +27:29:22.8
181.96216 0.45589 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 4.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" CG Tau
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.400 pg 19.000 : pg 2426224.00000 320.000000000000 M10
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:51:59.05 +27:29:22.8: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:51:59.05 +27:29:22.8: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 18.2889* 05 51 59.05 +27 29 22.8 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CG Tau,2461301.7889,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CG Tau 20260918.2889 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2889 2461301.7889 13.06 06:09:14.01 +29:08:52.5
182.39960 4.57498 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 3.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J060913.88+290852.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.440 g Y 0.290 g 2459173.01200 494.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:09:14.01 +29:08:52.5: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:14.01 +29:08:52.5: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J060913.88+290852.3,2461301.7889,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J060913.88+290852.3 20260918.2889 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 18.2889 2461301.7889 13.49 05:57:34.60 +32:28:31.6
178.26263 4.01417 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.984 Gretia -3 1 3 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:57:34.60 +32:28:31.6: 14.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:34.60 +32:28:31.6: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461301.7889,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260918.2889 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461301.78919225 18.09.2026 06:56:16.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 25
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25352
Objects passed selection criteria: 25274
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20695.8
Average stars matched: 20155.2 (97.3884 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 02:39:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461301.78919225 18.09.2026 06:56:16.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 339
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 87 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 194077
Objects passed selection criteria: 193576
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 148900
Average stars matched: 143614 (96.4501 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 588700 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Sep 11 14:55:52 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-210-g97d43bca
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Sep 18 02:41:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461301.78866212
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:56.483 +29:57:14.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:56.483 +29:57:14.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0461 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:54.720 +29:57:14.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:54.720 +29:57:14.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0485 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:56.483 +29:57:14.32
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:54.720 +29:57:14.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00636 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JbjcIXzzIT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bXdtwI3mpT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HIKlkKFpOn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nAIDx8sQHR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg
Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13641 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 23 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.3 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.JbjcIXzzIT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1003 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bXdtwI3mpT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HIKlkKFpOn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=744, bad_region=0, passed=14411
Got 14411 stars (including 13654 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14411 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4798 stars left (next iteration limit 5276)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4798 robust_rms=7.604 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.478 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4798 robust_rms=0.558 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.942 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4798 robust_rms=0.441 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.679 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4798 robust_rms_before=1.540 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.463 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.441 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.598 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.679
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.598 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits N_match=4798 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=1199 n_q2=943 n_q3=1671 n_q4=985 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nAIDx8sQHR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=759, bad_region=1, passed=14522
Got 14522 stars (including 13746 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4798 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4798 robust_rms=7.636 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.554 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4798 robust_rms=0.585 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.885 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4798 robust_rms=0.433 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.653 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4798 robust_rms_before=1.515 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.457 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.433 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.577 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.653
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.577 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits N_match=4798 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.453 n_q1=1199 n_q2=950 n_q3=1671 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.363
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.304
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.242
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.315
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.363
reference average sigma_overall=0.4535 worst_q_ratio=1.273
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4793 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269_astrometric_residuals.png (4798 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270_astrometric_residuals.png (4798 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:26:20.97 +31:53:06.7: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:14.61 +32:31:06.0: 11.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:37:41.66 +32:30:46.0: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:14.61 +32:31:06.0: 11.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:26:20.97 +31:53:06.7: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:37:41.66 +32:30:46.0: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:20.97 +31:53:06.7: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2211 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:14.61 +32:31:06.0: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.0879 delta=0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:41.66 +32:30:46.0: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1102 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31900_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 31900_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31903_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 31903_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:07.39 +32:33:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31904_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 31904_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:08.71 +32:31:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31905_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 31905_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:17.85 +32:31:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32001_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 32001_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32026_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 32026_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.32 +32:03:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32031_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 32031_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.70 +28:29:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32047_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 32047_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.71 +29:51:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32057_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 32057_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.37 +32:13:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32127_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 32127_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07385_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 07385_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:09.16 +32:18:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18059_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 18059_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.29 +27:45:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30950_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 30950_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:30.94 +31:25:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06883_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 06883_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:08.38 +32:33:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15512_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 15512_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:33.04 +29:09:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.08 +28:29:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11944_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 11944_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:08.89 +30:22:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 25384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.91 +25:25:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23892_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 23892_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.70 +25:49:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.73 +31:24:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13666_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 13666_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:04.39 +29:55:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16931_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 16931_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.03 +28:36:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18860_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 18860_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:00.98 +27:45:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:56.483 +29:57:14.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:56.483 +29:57:14.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0461 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:54.720 +29:57:14.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:54.720 +29:57:14.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0485 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:56.483 +29:57:14.32
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:54.720 +29:57:14.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00636 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mldxIAW3dk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ibcbMmAHKG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CPxsx1NdLC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sgfMInPP7E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec +24.3244 to +35.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec 24.3244 to 35.3140 deg
Loaded 17179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 14295 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14295 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 312 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mldxIAW3dk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1028 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ibcbMmAHKG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1364 n_q3=1217 n_q4=1159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CPxsx1NdLC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=6992, bad_region=23, passed=86429
Got 86429 stars (including 79339 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86429 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5263)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=7.774 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.393 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=0.563 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.934 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=0.442 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.686 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4786 robust_rms_before=1.533 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.467 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.442 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.648 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.686
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.648 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits N_match=4786 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.429 n_q1=1202 n_q2=909 n_q3=1698 n_q4=977 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sgfMInPP7E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=7183, bad_region=24, passed=87354
Got 87354 stars (including 80062 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87354 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4785 stars left (next iteration limit 5261)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=7.795 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.879 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=0.587 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.941 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=0.440 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.678 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4785 robust_rms_before=1.509 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.464 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.440 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.619 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.678
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.619 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits N_match=4785 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.465 n_q1=1203 n_q2=907 n_q3=1689 n_q4=986 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-55-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-18_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_015703_TTUQ1b1x1_3374521_TC66VE8a/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:26:05.70 +28:07:33.9: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:13.80 +33:38:38.4: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:30:49.20 +26:42:56.9: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:50.71 +32:30:27.4: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:47:08.62 +30:25:57.7: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:57:48.12 +32:38:28.3: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:05:29.09 +25:21:18.9: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:28.42 +34:25:39.9: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:13.80 +33:38:38.4: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:30:49.20 +26:42:56.9: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:48.12 +32:38:28.3: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:29.09 +25:21:18.9: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:50.71 +32:30:27.4: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:28.42 +34:25:39.9: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:26:05.70 +28:07:33.9: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:47:08.62 +30:25:57.7: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:13.80 +33:38:38.4: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7427 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:49.20 +26:42:56.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9235 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:50.71 +32:30:27.4: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4817 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:48.12 +32:38:28.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6744 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:05.70 +28:07:33.9: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1044 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:28.42 +34:25:39.9: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6949 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:29.09 +25:21:18.9: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9646 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:08.62 +30:25:57.7: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3843 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:25:05.00 +32:40:31.7: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:34:31.00 +27:49:05.2: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:25:05.00 +32:40:31.7: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:05.00 +32:40:31.7: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6631 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:26:00.84 +31:01:18.2: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:30.94 +26:14:04.9: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:23:15.44 +27:43:59.6: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:30:00.36 +33:25:04.9: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:30:04.97 +33:28:54.6: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:27:59.04 +33:22:59.0: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:34:31.00 +27:49:05.2: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:31.00 +27:49:05.2: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3345 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:15.44 +27:43:59.6: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:30:00.36 +33:25:04.9: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:30:04.97 +33:28:54.6: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:30.94 +26:14:04.9: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:26:00.84 +31:01:18.2: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:27:59.04 +33:22:59.0: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:15.44 +27:43:59.6: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7636 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:00.36 +33:25:04.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4419 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:00.84 +31:01:18.2: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5428 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:04.97 +33:28:54.6: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3849 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:30.94 +26:14:04.9: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3936 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:59.04 +33:22:59.0: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4767 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:14.58 +27:23:07.7: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:11.86 +26:16:28.7: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:14.58 +27:23:07.7: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:14.58 +27:23:07.7: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5769 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:36:11.54 +31:54:36.3: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:11.86 +26:16:28.7: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:26:36.05 +29:31:29.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:11.86 +26:16:28.7: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6553 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:36:11.54 +31:54:36.3: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:11.54 +31:54:36.3: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5965 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:25:15.96 +24:28:17.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:26:36.05 +29:31:29.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:15.96 +24:28:17.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:15.96 +24:28:17.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:23:36.49 +24:29:49.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:23:52.26 +34:20:46.9: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:36.49 +24:29:49.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:36.49 +24:29:49.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:23:52.26 +34:20:46.9: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:52.26 +34:20:46.9: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2441 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:27:13.19 +34:25:20.4: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:27:13.19 +34:25:20.4: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:13.19 +34:25:20.4: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2618 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:25:59.88 +28:37:32.7: 13.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:25:59.88 +28:37:32.7: 13.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:59.88 +28:37:32.7: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1931 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:19.45 +33:51:25.1: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:48:04.84 +30:32:10.4: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:49:41.69 +34:39:41.1: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:19.45 +33:51:25.1: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:48:07.09 +30:36:23.3: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:19.45 +33:51:25.1: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4406 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:48:04.84 +30:32:10.4: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:04.84 +30:32:10.4: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1671 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:49:41.69 +34:39:41.1: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:48:07.09 +30:36:23.3: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:41.69 +34:39:41.1: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3677 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:07.09 +30:36:23.3: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2618 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:01.54 +27:35:20.1: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:40:22.88 +32:34:57.3: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:01:27.08 +29:36:13.0: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:01.54 +27:35:20.1: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:01.54 +27:35:20.1: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9070 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:40:22.88 +32:34:57.3: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:22.88 +32:34:57.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3973 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:27.08 +29:36:13.0: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:27.08 +29:36:13.0: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2581 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:00.86 +34:10:25.7: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:00.86 +34:10:25.7: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:00.86 +34:10:25.7: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4295 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:06.19 +32:08:03.5: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:06.19 +32:08:03.5: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:06.19 +32:08:03.5: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5805 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:54:39.82 +33:39:59.3: 15.81 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:39.82 +33:39:59.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.81 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:54:39.82 +33:39:59.3: ref_mag=15.81 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=13.8636 delta=1.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:27.51 +26:18:02.4: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:27.51 +26:18:02.4: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:08:27.51 +26:18:02.4: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9202 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:57:52.72 +26:05:02.4: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:52.72 +26:05:02.4: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:57:52.72 +26:05:02.4: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0685 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:05.66 +24:35:38.9: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:05.66 +24:35:38.9: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:05.66 +24:35:38.9: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6420 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:50.07 +25:55:21.0: 14.53 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:50.07 +25:55:21.0: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:44:50.07 +25:55:21.0: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1186 delta=1.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:16:02.42 +25:38:31.9: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:02.42 +25:38:31.9: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:16:02.42 +25:38:31.9: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6646 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:55:18.18 +32:11:57.9: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:55:18.18 +32:11:57.9: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:18.18 +32:11:57.9: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6072 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:59:52.33 +30:48:45.4: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:52.33 +30:48:45.4: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:52.33 +30:48:45.4: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6002 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:58:58.18 +26:48:43.0: 14.48 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:58.18 +26:48:43.0: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:58:58.18 +26:48:43.0: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3224 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:19.90 +25:15:04.0: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:19.90 +25:15:04.0: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:19.90 +25:15:04.0: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1319 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:37:27.74 +28:39:31.8: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:09.41 +29:08:33.4: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:37:27.74 +28:39:31.8: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:37:27.74 +28:39:31.8: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2363 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:09.41 +29:08:33.4: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:46:09.41 +29:08:33.4: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2403 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:51:59.05 +27:29:22.8: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:09:14.01 +29:08:52.5: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:51:59.05 +27:29:22.8: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:51:59.05 +27:29:22.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9536 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:14.01 +29:08:52.5: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:09:14.01 +29:08:52.5: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0631 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:57.53 +28:17:19.0: 10.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:57:34.60 +32:28:31.6: 14.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:57.53 +28:17:19.0: 10.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.61 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:57.53 +28:17:19.0: ref_mag=10.61 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7376 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:34.60 +32:28:31.6: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:57:34.60 +32:28:31.6: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4930 delta=1.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:30:59.69 +27:27:08.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:59.69 +27:27:08.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:59.69 +27:27:08.8: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out243549.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out121364.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out123407.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133303.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159080.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out170265.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172224.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176728.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out181488.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190478.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242478.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54327.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242155_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242155_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242159_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242159_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242166_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242166_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242167_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242167_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242178_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242178_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242181_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242181_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242184_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242184_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242185_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242185_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242188_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242188_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242192_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242192_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:29.30 +30:21:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:03.66 +28:40:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242196_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242196_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:50.27 +30:31:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242197_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242197_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242199_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242199_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242201_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242201_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242202_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242202_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242204_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242204_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:12.50 +30:49:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242207_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242207_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242211_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242211_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:11.62 +27:55:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242212_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242212_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242214_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242214_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242216_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242216_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242218_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242218_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:26.10 +34:29:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242219_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242219_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:06.06 +25:42:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242221_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242221_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242222_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242222_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:42.73 +26:40:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242224_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242224_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:03.13 +34:11:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242228_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242228_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:21.08 +34:19:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242230_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242230_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:49.46 +33:56:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242231_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242231_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242232_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242232_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.80 +28:49:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242234_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242234_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:09.71 +34:19:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242235_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242235_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242236_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242236_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:59.64 +34:57:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242283_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242283_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242360_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242360_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.29 +32:03:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242368_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242368_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242373_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242373_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242376_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242376_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.68 +28:29:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242387_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242387_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242477_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242477_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.55 +26:13:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242478_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 242478_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242490_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242490_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.83 +34:55:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242497_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242497_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.26 +28:37:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242504_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242504_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.58 +27:35:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.68 +34:23:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242543_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242543_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242546_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242546_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:17.73 +30:10:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242553_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242553_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242574_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242574_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.87 +25:55:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242583_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242583_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242639_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242639_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.46 +31:10:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242640_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242640_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242650_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242650_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.54 +32:41:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242652_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242652_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242673_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242673_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:16.65 +32:45:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242686_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242686_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:15.65 +31:22:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242714_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242714_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.99 +25:05:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242719_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242719_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242741_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242741_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:09.82 +24:55:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242742_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242742_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:23.53 +31:49:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242796_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242796_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242800_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242800_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:57.07 +26:41:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242809_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242809_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.15 +32:48:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242818_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242818_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:18.81 +29:32:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242826_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242826_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:47.22 +29:10:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242829_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242829_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:00.10 +34:55:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242843_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242843_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242844_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242844_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:12.03 +29:29:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242846_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242846_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:35.22 +32:16:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242847_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242847_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.17 +33:06:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242848_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242848_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:49.16 +33:17:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242854_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242854_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:15.43 +32:06:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242861_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242861_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.74 +30:30:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242874_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242874_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242903_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242903_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:33.11 +32:52:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242906_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242906_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:51.90 +29:43:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242913_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242913_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:45.48 +27:47:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242914_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242914_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:49.32 +32:38:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242918_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242918_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242920_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242920_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242924_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242924_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:32.57 +30:42:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242925_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242925_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:07.10 +34:56:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242937_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242937_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242951_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242951_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242952_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242952_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:53.12 +28:27:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242956_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242956_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:03.70 +34:26:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242962_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242962_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:52.21 +34:52:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242965_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242965_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:47.01 +32:30:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242968_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242968_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:24.93 +31:04:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242975_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242975_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242981_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242981_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.80 +31:57:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242987_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 242987_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:38.51 +25:01:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243002_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243002_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:43.62 +32:59:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243007_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243007_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:07.21 +28:15:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243014_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243014_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:38.95 +34:28:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243025_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243025_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243033_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243033_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.40 +25:25:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243034_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243034_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243039_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243039_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.37 +25:47:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243046_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243046_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243049_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243049_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243057_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243057_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243063_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243063_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243064_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243064_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:32.88 +34:52:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243067_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243067_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:49.37 +30:55:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243073_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243073_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.68 +33:48:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243080_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243080_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:03.94 +33:02:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243081_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243081_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:50.83 +30:45:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243090_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243090_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:50.94 +33:20:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:38.30 +32:48:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243116_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243116_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:32.90 +32:17:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243118_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243118_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:03.86 +32:12:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243123_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243123_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:19.94 +31:18:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243125_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243125_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:29.18 +32:15:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243129_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243129_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243130_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243130_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243131_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243131_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:16.08 +34:30:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243134_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243134_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:50.10 +31:16:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243135_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243135_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:57.70 +32:02:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243139_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243139_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:12.71 +34:06:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243149_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243149_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:22.86 +31:57:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243158_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243158_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243159_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243159_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243171_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243171_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:57.58 +34:53:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243172_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243172_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:56.77 +29:14:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243180_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243180_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243184_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243184_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:55.06 +32:40:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243199_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243199_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:02.27 +27:09:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243203_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243203_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:13.42 +32:16:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243222_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243222_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243239_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243239_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243242_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243242_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:31.71 +33:12:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243252_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243252_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:41.04 +29:59:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243260_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243260_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243261_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243261_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243264_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243264_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.45 +27:03:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243280_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243280_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243286_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243286_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:20.38 +31:33:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243287_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243287_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:49.89 +31:50:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243291_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243291_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:13.61 +32:04:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243310_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243310_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:40.20 +32:48:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243316_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243316_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243339_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243339_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243340_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243340_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:59.87 +32:02:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243350_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243350_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:36.69 +27:09:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243356_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243356_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243357_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243357_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:08.33 +33:38:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243368_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243368_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243371_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243371_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:19.50 +32:39:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243377_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243377_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243383_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243383_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243402_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243402_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:18.52 +30:03:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243408_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243408_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:29.77 +34:14:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243410_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243410_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243411_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243411_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.69 +26:22:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243412_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243412_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243420_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243420_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243437_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243437_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243455_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243455_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:16.14 +33:26:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243457_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243457_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243464_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243464_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:27.15 +33:05:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243467_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243467_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243479_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243479_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:52.23 +31:12:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243485_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243485_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243510_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243510_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243527_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243527_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243533_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243533_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243539_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243539_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243549_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243549_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:39.82 +33:39:59.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.141 3451413660116544768 088.66553592248 +33.66647774569 13.0932 10.9828 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.141#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243562_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243562_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243577_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243577_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243587_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243587_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243595_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243595_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243610_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243610_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243617_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243617_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243620_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243620_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243629_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243629_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243635_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243635_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243637_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243637_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243638_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243638_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243642_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243642_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243644_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243644_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243646_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243646_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243648_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243648_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243654_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243654_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243655_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243655_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243658_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243658_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243660_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243660_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243668_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 243668_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167626_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 167626_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.67 +25:57:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 116475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:22.24 +29:29:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117937_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 117937_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:22.32 +29:30:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186034_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 186034_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:20.03 +26:31:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43251_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 43251_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:08.02 +32:56:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181488_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 181488_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 144103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:41.94 +28:18:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207689_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 207689_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:54.58 +25:01:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146772_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 146772_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:36.46 +27:56:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 173004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:45.03 +25:51:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153246_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 153246_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:00.86 +27:45:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107968_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 107968_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:08.59 +29:48:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176728_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 176728_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 70434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:37.29 +31:42:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:32.81 +29:09:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 92068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:04.16 +30:40:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189546_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 189546_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:47.19 +26:45:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97622_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 97622_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:11.15 +30:08:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173612_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 173612_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:38.15 +25:51:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76582_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 76582_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:50.29 +31:16:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204070_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 204070_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169250_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 169250_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:04.53 +25:40:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91853_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 91853_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:08.87 +30:22:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.35 +32:13:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198853_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 198853_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:34.63 +27:15:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.71 +29:51:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:40.01 +32:01:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:22.96 +34:38:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196073_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 196073_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:13.30 +26:58:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172224_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 172224_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 34292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:25.26 +33:26:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119656_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 119656_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:50.45 +29:13:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24946_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 24946_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.02 +33:54:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62719_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 62719_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:59.96 +31:33:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08724_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 08724_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:23.47 +34:45:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.57 +25:40:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170265_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 170265_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146439_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 146439_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:45.14 +28:01:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 131773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:55.01 +28:34:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175224_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 175224_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:34.93 +26:03:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 137801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:03.98 +28:27:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162313_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 162313_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:08.33 +27:19:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141098_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 141098_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:30.36 +28:19:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14794_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 14794_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:04.02 +34:25:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.17 +27:36:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206328_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 206328_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 142517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:19.30 +28:15:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230172_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 230172_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:43.30 +29:06:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:40.02 +28:00:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 153284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:15.19 +27:47:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.79 +34:35:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 60257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.49 +29:32:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113818_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 113818_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:37.23 +29:27:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206471_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 206471_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.84 +25:01:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:01.64 +30:45:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177101_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 177101_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:38.86 +26:09:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125354_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 125354_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:10.85 +29:04:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88141_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 88141_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190478_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 190478_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 174517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.24 +25:59:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81129_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 81129_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:09.42 +31:08:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:38.45 +31:03:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43459_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 43459_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:28.58 +32:53:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 135068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:20.94 +28:36:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166881_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 166881_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 28544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:23.55 +33:45:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204588_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 204588_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.23 +24:59:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157556_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 157556_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:39.62 +27:33:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.05 +28:29:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62099_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 62099_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:39.10 +31:50:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 81801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:31.26 +31:05:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133303_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 133303_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:30.91 +31:25:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123407_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 123407_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 67384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:40.23 +31:50:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 179530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:09.33 +25:59:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.39 +27:23:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124884_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 124884_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:05.58 +28:56:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101740_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 101740_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:39.28 +30:11:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:12.75 +30:56:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 186103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:13.09 +26:34:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105842_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 105842_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:13.66 +29:53:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178641_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 178641_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:52.80 +25:57:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.04 +28:36:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44640_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 44640_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:02.04 +32:58:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183260_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 183260_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:40.19 +26:28:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84829_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 84829_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:40.47 +30:55:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 145773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:51.71 +28:08:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.27 +27:45:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51841_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 51841_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:08.36 +32:33:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159080_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 159080_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:52.18 +29:02:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203366_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 203366_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.34 +24:55:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149793_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 149793_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.69 +27:55:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.11 +32:03:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121364_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 121364_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209361_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 209361_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:11.21 +25:11:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.91 +25:25:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:16.98 +31:35:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114879_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 114879_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:49.60 +29:22:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108247_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 108247_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:04.41 +29:55:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33936_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 33936_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:27.88 +33:18:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.21 +27:29:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55107_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 55107_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:09.16 +32:18:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134202_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 134202_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162930_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 162930_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:33.66 +25:25:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69742_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 69742_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:28.24 +31:40:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170803_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 170803_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.68 +25:49:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54327_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
Preparing report for the candidate 54327_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21035_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 21035_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.73 +31:24:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16497_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 16497_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:08.35 +34:19:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13713_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 13713_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:23.29 +34:27:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156085_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 156085_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90173_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270
The candidate 90173_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-18_01-56-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0270 did not pass the final checks
